Tuesday, 28 January 2014
Sweden: Muslims parents arrested for “smacking” son over prayer
by Rachel Banning-Lover - telegraph.co.uk
Thousands of Malaysians are backing a campaign for the release of a Muslim couple after they were arrested in Sweden for allegedly smacking their 12-year-old son’s hand when he refused to pray.
Azizul Raheem Awalludin, who is the Stockholm director of the Malaysian tourist board, has been on remand for over a month with his teacher wife Shalwati Nurshal, and anger back home has erupted over both their detainment without charge, and that their four children were placed with non-Muslim foster parents.
A Facebook page, Bring Shal and Family Home, has amassed more than 14,000 followers in five days as the Malaysian media reports that the oldest child, Aisyah, is uncomfortable about living in a house where non-halal food is served and a dog is kept.
“Although they do not feed us non-halal food, we share the crockery and utensils used for non-halal food,” she said.
“We have to fend for ourselves. Every day we have to take the public transport such as the bus or train in cold weather. We don’t have enough warm clothing.”
The teenager also complained about the Swedish authorities stopping the children from seeing relatives who had flown into look after them.
The detained couple have requested the Swedish Social Services to let their children be temporarily cared for by a Muslim family at the Malaysian embassy in Sweden until their case is resolved, according to Free Malaysia Today newspaper.
Rohani Abdul Karim, Malaysia’s Minister for Families told Malaysian media that the Government was doing all it could to resolve the case through diplomatic channels: “We believe there was no child abuse involved.”
“It was probably a misunderstanding about the parents educating their children religiously and instilling good Muslim values in them from a young age.”
Swedish authorities, who were alerted about the incident by the boy’s school, are continuing to investigate the parents.
Sweden has strict laws banning all physical punishment of children, and many internet users have questioned how the family were ignorant of these protection laws – when it is believed they had lived in the country three years.
Sweden’s laws has surprised many in Malaysia though, where parents smacking their children is widely accepted as normal.
Philip Golingai, a columnist in the Kuala Lumpur newspaper The Star, reminisced about being beaten by the rotan, a cane, during his childhood in the 1980s: “Some of my schoolmates had it worse. Their parents hit them with broomsticks, feather dusters, clothes hangers, belts and irons.”
Azizul Raheem Awalludin, who is the Stockholm director of the Malaysian tourist board, has been on remand for over a month with his teacher wife Shalwati Nurshal, and anger back home has erupted over both their detainment without charge, and that their four children were placed with non-Muslim foster parents.
A Facebook page, Bring Shal and Family Home, has amassed more than 14,000 followers in five days as the Malaysian media reports that the oldest child, Aisyah, is uncomfortable about living in a house where non-halal food is served and a dog is kept.
“Although they do not feed us non-halal food, we share the crockery and utensils used for non-halal food,” she said.
“We have to fend for ourselves. Every day we have to take the public transport such as the bus or train in cold weather. We don’t have enough warm clothing.”
The teenager also complained about the Swedish authorities stopping the children from seeing relatives who had flown into look after them.
The detained couple have requested the Swedish Social Services to let their children be temporarily cared for by a Muslim family at the Malaysian embassy in Sweden until their case is resolved, according to Free Malaysia Today newspaper.
Rohani Abdul Karim, Malaysia’s Minister for Families told Malaysian media that the Government was doing all it could to resolve the case through diplomatic channels: “We believe there was no child abuse involved.”
“It was probably a misunderstanding about the parents educating their children religiously and instilling good Muslim values in them from a young age.”
Swedish authorities, who were alerted about the incident by the boy’s school, are continuing to investigate the parents.
Sweden has strict laws banning all physical punishment of children, and many internet users have questioned how the family were ignorant of these protection laws – when it is believed they had lived in the country three years.
Sweden’s laws has surprised many in Malaysia though, where parents smacking their children is widely accepted as normal.
Philip Golingai, a columnist in the Kuala Lumpur newspaper The Star, reminisced about being beaten by the rotan, a cane, during his childhood in the 1980s: “Some of my schoolmates had it worse. Their parents hit them with broomsticks, feather dusters, clothes hangers, belts and irons.”
Labels:
Islam Discrimination
World Cup: 185 Nepalese died in Qatar last year, official records say
Death toll likely to rise as new cases revealed, sparking fresh wave of concern over treatment of migrants
By Owen Gibson - Gulfnews
London: The extent of the risks faced by migrant construction workers building the infrastructure for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar has been laid bare by official documents revealing 185 Nepalese men died last year alone.
The 2013 death toll, which is expected to rise further as new cases come to light, is likely to spark a fresh wave of concern over the treatment of migrant workers in Qatar and increase the pressure on Fifa to force meaningful change.
According to the documents the total number of verified deaths among workers from Nepal, just one of several countries that supply hundreds of thousands of migrant workers to the gas rich state, is now at least 382 in two years alone. At least 36 of those deaths were registered in the weeks following the global outcry that followed the Guardian’s original revelations in September.
The revelations forced Fifa president Sepp Blatter to promise football would not “turn a blind eye” to the issue following a stormy executive committee meeting. The Qatar ministry of labour hired law firm DLA Piper to conduct an urgent review and Hassan Al Thawadi, chief executive of the World Cup organising committee, said the findings would be treated with utmost seriousness, vowing the tournament would not be built “on the blood of innocents”. The DLA Piper report is expected to be published in the coming weeks.
The Nepalese make up around one sixth of Qatar’s 2 million population of migrant workers, with verified figures for the 2013 death rates among those from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and elsewhere yet to emerge.
The Nepalese organisation working with the families of dead workers to repatriate their bodies and campaign for adequate compensation from the companies that employed them under the kafala sponsorship system said on Friday that Fifa should do more.
The overall death toll is expected to rise still further, with the Pravasi Nepali Co-ordination Committee (PNCC), which has cross checked the figures from official sources in Doha against death certificates and passports, still receiving new cases on a regular basis. The Guardian has seen evidence of at least a further eight cases, which would take the 2013 total to 193.
The PNCC called on Fifa’s sponsors to reconsider their relationship with world football’s governing body, which awarded the World Cup to Qatar in December 2010.
“Fifa and the government of Qatar promised the world that they would take action to ensure the safety of workers building the stadiums and infrastructure for the 2022 World Cup. This horrendous roll-call of the dead gives the lie to those reassurances,” said a spokesman for the PNCC.
“These were young or otherwise able-bodied men, with their futures in front of them, families at home and everything to live for. Many have been literally worked to death. Some have met with even more sinister ends. All have been betrayed by Fifa.”
London: The extent of the risks faced by migrant construction workers building the infrastructure for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar has been laid bare by official documents revealing 185 Nepalese men died last year alone.
The 2013 death toll, which is expected to rise further as new cases come to light, is likely to spark a fresh wave of concern over the treatment of migrant workers in Qatar and increase the pressure on Fifa to force meaningful change.
According to the documents the total number of verified deaths among workers from Nepal, just one of several countries that supply hundreds of thousands of migrant workers to the gas rich state, is now at least 382 in two years alone. At least 36 of those deaths were registered in the weeks following the global outcry that followed the Guardian’s original revelations in September.
The revelations forced Fifa president Sepp Blatter to promise football would not “turn a blind eye” to the issue following a stormy executive committee meeting. The Qatar ministry of labour hired law firm DLA Piper to conduct an urgent review and Hassan Al Thawadi, chief executive of the World Cup organising committee, said the findings would be treated with utmost seriousness, vowing the tournament would not be built “on the blood of innocents”. The DLA Piper report is expected to be published in the coming weeks.
The Nepalese make up around one sixth of Qatar’s 2 million population of migrant workers, with verified figures for the 2013 death rates among those from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and elsewhere yet to emerge.
The Nepalese organisation working with the families of dead workers to repatriate their bodies and campaign for adequate compensation from the companies that employed them under the kafala sponsorship system said on Friday that Fifa should do more.
The overall death toll is expected to rise still further, with the Pravasi Nepali Co-ordination Committee (PNCC), which has cross checked the figures from official sources in Doha against death certificates and passports, still receiving new cases on a regular basis. The Guardian has seen evidence of at least a further eight cases, which would take the 2013 total to 193.
The PNCC called on Fifa’s sponsors to reconsider their relationship with world football’s governing body, which awarded the World Cup to Qatar in December 2010.
“Fifa and the government of Qatar promised the world that they would take action to ensure the safety of workers building the stadiums and infrastructure for the 2022 World Cup. This horrendous roll-call of the dead gives the lie to those reassurances,” said a spokesman for the PNCC.
“These were young or otherwise able-bodied men, with their futures in front of them, families at home and everything to live for. Many have been literally worked to death. Some have met with even more sinister ends. All have been betrayed by Fifa.”
Labels:
World Cup 2014
Change of MB needs Sultan’s accord and Pakatan endorsement
"An MB's appointment must have the consensus of all three parties (in Pakatan Rakyat). The MB candidate must be chosen and agreed upon by the parties.
"They must also inform the sultan and get his consent. There are a lot of procedures," he told reporters after attending the launching of a book on the maps of Malaya and Borneo in Kuala Lumpur today.
Khalid dismissed talk that Kajang assemblyman Lee Chin Cheh’s sudden resignation was part of a plan to remove him
“No such thing," he said, dismissing claims that Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim will be contesting the Kajang seat in the imminent by-election, to replace him.
"There have been no discussions on this," he said, although adding that he “would not be surprised” if there was an attempted coup against him.
Khalid said any move to remove him must be done with a consensus of the three Pakatan parties – DAP, PAS and PKR.
"It can be done only if all three parties sit together to decide so. There must be a discussion, and right now there has been none as yet," he stressed.
Earlier today, the popular second term MB declared that he was still the state administrator and that he was "not going anywa,y" admidst speculation that he was quitting.
Abdul Khalid also said there had been no discussion with PKR supremo Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim on the latter replacing him as menteri besar.
He said he had not received any word from the Selangor palace on any change to the menteri besar's post, stressing that the palace had to be informed of a critical change to the state's administration.
"I strongly deny these rumours and I hope that the media is more careful in its speculation. Do your research first. There is a process that has to be done first, if change is to take place.
"I have spoken to him (Anwar), but our discussions were on other matters. This (Abdul Khalid's resignation) did not crop up," the Selangor MB said, while distributing oranges in Klang today.
Abdul Khalid was refuting a report in The Star today that he would be resigning this Wednesday to make way for Anwar.
Quoting party sources, the report said a special by-election would be held in Selangor to enable Anwar, an MP from Penang, to contest for a seat in the state assembly, so that he can hold the post of menteri besar.
The report came on the heels of a vigorous effort by some people in PKR to remove Abdul Khalid, a popular figure in his state, as menteri besar.
Several PKR leaders are pushing to remove Abdul Khalid from the post after state party chief Azmin Ali was dropped from state developer PKNS's board of directors.
Khalid has denied any wrongdoing in that decision, saying it was done by the firm, not the state executive council which decides on appointments.
The second-term Abdul Khalid was the top choice for the post, although his PKR only won 14 state seats, while their Pakatan Rakyat (PR) allies DAP and PAS won 15 seats each in the 56-seat assembly.
Abdul Khalid stressed that there had not been any discussion between him and the Sultan of Selangor regarding his post as menteri besar.
"If I want to do anything, I must first get the advice from the Sultan. I cannot leave out that institution.
"There have been discussions on development in Selangor, but not on this (his resignation)."
He also brushed off moves from certain party members to remove him, saying that their demands were similar to the calls for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to resign.
"They can make demands, but you have to go through a process first," he said, referring to the need to get the consent of the Sultan of Selangor to replace the menteri besar. - January 27, 2014.
Labels:
Selangor
‘Rights, Not Mercy’ Hindraf begging for Umno's mercy
For the past 56 years Indian Malaysians were systematically marginalised and kicked out from mainstream programmes by the Umno-led government. The sweet promises of PM Najib Abdul Razak and his team managed to conquer the heart of the Hindraf movement which had shaken up the Umno government in the 12th general election.
Persatuan Hindraf Malaysia, which had stood vigilant and been a loud voice of Indian Malaysians against the atrocities of Umno, became a voice for voiceless and defenceless people. Najib promised to accept a six-point demand, a special ministry under the Prime Minister’s Department, and a figure of RM 4.5 billion yearly had been mentioned.
Today, eight months after the signing of the MOU and after 56 years of waiting and drama of elections, the Indian Malaysian community has been left in the lurch. Not a single point has been implemented.
Before this, PM Najib had asked forgiveness in three different events, two were in front of Indian Malaysian crowds to get their valuable votes. In the MOU with Persatuan Hindraf Malaysia, a unit was promised to take care of Indian affairs, but till today no unit has been formed.
In the speech of the association’s leader P Waythamoorthy at the events, the crowd was told that Najib promised over 600 government contracts, but none were delivered. Waythamoorthy was appointed as a deputy minister under the Prime Minister’s Office. He was paid approximately RM20,000 a month, with a government car and a driver, but till today what his role is in the PM’s Office is still a question mark for all Malaysians.
‘Janji ditepati’?
There are programmes which PM Najib and Waythamoorthy could have done without any financial involvement. These are to avoid temple and Indian burial ground demolition, to approve birth certificates and identity cards for thousands of stateless Indians, to convert all Tamil schools to fully government-aided schools and stopping the displacement of Indian settlements.
During these eight months, several temples been demolished, including an ancient Bujang Valley temple in Kedah, the problems of stateless Indian Malaysians were not settled (lately an Indian Malaysian student drank poison due to not being allowed to register in a secondary school), Kg Railway in Sentul was demolished, the Bukit Jalil estate is awaiting demolition and a few Indian Malaysian settlements have been demolished by Najib’s government.
The whole MOU with Persatuan Hindraf Malaysia was breached and Indian Malaysians regarded it as toilet paper.
Persatuan Hindraf Malaysia, be honest with the public. Did you table the same demands with Pakatan as you had with Barisan Nasional?
The association intentionally dropped many demands towards Barisan Nasional, whereas they were demanding extra seats from Pakatan in the 13th general election. This shows that the association had a political agenda but then cheated the Indian community by saying Persatuan Hindraf Malaysia is an apolitical movement.
PM Najib gave hot capati and Waythamoorthy brought disappointment for the whole Indian Malaysian community. Najib’s hot capati is regarded as ‘hangat hangat tahi ayam’, but Waythamoorthy the self-claimed Indian Malaysian representative sold the community’s dignity to Barisan Nasional.
Today, Persatuan Hindraf Malaysia is no longer voicing out for the voiceless Indian Malaysians. They are just depending on the mercy of Umno. Once in a while they give press statements as an eyewash.
I challenge Waythamoorthy to tell the truth to the public and walk out of BN because these eight months you didn’t achieve anything. PM Najib should understand that the signing of the MOU with you will not bring back poor Indians to BN. This is your last chance, our curse will haunt BN and their marginalising laws forever.
Labels:
Hindraf
MIC man quits pending RM5mil case appeal
“I hope the president will accept my resignation as he had been bombarded by the media because of this issue; despite this being a civil case and personal matter which has nothing to do with MIC or Barisan Nasional, the president was made the victim, which is not fair.
“This is my own decision and I had not been forced or asked to resign,” he told a press conference at the MIC headquarters in Kuala Lumpur.
The High Court ordered Ramanan to return to Dr Mahadevan, RM5.5 million which he was alleged to have fraudulently received while ‘assisting’ the specialist to pursue a claim four years ago.
Judicial Commissioner Lee Heng Cheong in his judgment, said he concurred with counsel Lavinia Kumaraendran and Cassandra Lee who were representing Dr Mahadevan, that Ramanan had misled the plaintiff into transferring the money into his personal account on May 19, 2010.
Ramanan said he filed an appeal against the court’s decision this morning.
Asked whether he would withdraw his decision to step down should the court of appeal rule in his favour, Ramanan said: “I leave this matter to the president and MIC members to decide.”
- Bernama
Labels:
MIC
Kisah Datuk Seri Guruji
(FMT) Selain daripada watak Datuk Guluji, nampaknya ada individu lain yang seolah-olah menggunakan modus operandi sama.
COMMENT
Salah satu isu hangat dalam kalangan kaum India sejak sekitar sedekad lalu adalah mengenai ajaran sesat yang disebarkan secara amat terancang dan amat licik oleh individu yang dipercayai menggunakan ilmu pukau.
Saya menulis makalah bertajuk “Kisah Datuk Guluji” (FMT, 2 Disember 2013) dan “Lagi kisah Datuk Guluji” (FMT, 25 Januari 2014) berdasarkan maklumat yang disampaikan sejumlah individu yang pernah menjadi mangsa seorang penipu yang bertopengkan “guruji” iaitu guru agama Hindu.
Susulan daripada itu, surat pembaca turut disiarkan di FMT pada 6, 7, 10 dan 26 Disember 2013. Ramai juga yang menghubungi saya secara peribadi untuk berkongsi pengalaman sedih menjadi mangsa beberapa orang guruji.
Ternyata “Datuk Guluji” yang didedahkan menerusi makalah saya bukan satu-satunya individu yang menggunakan agama sebagai senjata dan alat untuk menipu orang dan mengaut keuntungan.
Pendedahan besar-besaran mengenai seorang individu bernama Balakrishnan Vellasamy atau “Datuk Seri Guruji” dilakukan secara amat berani oleh akhbar Tamil Malar pada pertengahan Disember 2013.
Susulan daripada pendedahan berani itu, pejabat akhbar berkenaan dilaporkan diserang sekumpulan penyokong tegar Balakrishnan. Saya kurang berpeluang mengikuti kisah itu kerana berada di Hat Yai, Thailand bersama-sama Kughan Nadarajah bagi “Kunjungan Kebudayaan Kavyan” (17-20 Disember 2013).
Makalah bertajuk “Kisah mangsa ‘guruji’ dibukukan” (FMT, 28 Disember 2013) pula ditulis berdasarkan pelbagai maklumat tambahan yang diterima serta pengalaman membaca buku yang ditulis seorang bekas mangsa seorang guruji.
Salah satu persoalan yang timbul adalah mengapa Malaysia Hindu Sangam (MHS) tidak kelihatan mengambil sebarang tindakan tegas membendung pelbagai ajaran sesat yang disebarkan beberapa individu dengan memanipulasi nama agama (istilah dalam konteks Bahasa Sanskrit, bukan Bahasa Malaysia).
Sehingga kini, saya masih menerima pelbagai aduan dan maklumat daripada orang ramai berhubung isu ajaran sesat ini. Ramai juga yang mempersoalkan kredibiliti MHS sedangkan ia badan tertinggi dalam soal agama Hindu di negara ini.
Maka, apabila berpelung bertemu bekas presiden MHS, Datuk A Vaithilingam di kediaman beliau di Petaling Jaya, baru-baru ini, saya tidak melepaskan peluang meminta pandangan beliau berhubung isu hangat ini.
Perbualan kami menggunakan Bahasa Tamil dan berikut adalah transkrip yang saya tulis berdasarkan rakaman sebahagian perbualan itu. Sekiranya timbul sebarang kekeliruan, harap maklum bahawa terjemahan saya mungkin sahaja tidak seratus peratus menggambarkan kata-kata sebenar dalam bahasa asal.
Uthaya: MHS sekarang dilihat diam dalam isu penyebaran ajaran sesat oleh pelbagai guruji yang
muncul bagaikan cendawan selepas hujan. Apakah semasa Datuk menjadi presiden MHS (Oktober 1996 – Ogos 2009) pernah timbul isu seperti ini?
Vaithilingam: Saya antara individu yang paling awal mengeluarkan kenyataan menentang ajaran yang disebarkan itu.
Sebenarnya, pada sekitar tahun 1997, seorang individu dari Johor datang bertemu saya selaku presiden MHS dan mengadu telah menyerahkan wang sehingga RM3,000 kepada Balakrishnan.
Mangsa itu mengatakan bahawa apa-apa yang dijanjikan oleh Balakrishnan tidak menjadi kenyataan dan dia mahu wang dikembalikan. Guruji itu tidak mahu memulangkan wang dan mangsa membawa kes ke mahkamah.
Ini adalah kisah lama; sebelum Balakrishnan menjadi “Datuk Seri Guruji” yang kaya-raya dan berpengaruh besar seperti sekarang. Pada masa itu, dia masih menunggang basikal dari tempat ke tempat untuk menyebarkan ajarannya di Johor.
Sekitar dua tahun kemudian, saya mendapat tahu bahawa Balakrishnan telah menghubungi mangsa tadi dan merayu kes ditarik balik. Wang RM3,000 dipulangkan dan kes ditutup begitu sahaja.
Saya lalu membiarkan sahaja kes itu kerana dianggap sudah selesai. Akan tetapi, pada sekitar tahun 2002, aduan kembali diterima oleh MHS daripada beberapa orang.
Mangsa membuat laporan kepada kami bahawa mereka perlu membayar RM730 untuk menyertai suatu kursus motivasi keagamaan anjuran guruji itu.
Hasil maklumat yang diterima, kursus besar-besaran nampaknya diadakan di Pusat Dagangan Dunia Putra (PWTC), Kuala Lumpur dan agen-agen kepada Balakrishnan membawa peserta dari seluruh negara.
Apakah tindakan Datuk dan MHS apabila menerima laporan pada kali ini?
Sebagai individu yang memegang jawatan presiden MHS (1996-2009), saya mengadakan sesi perbincangan khas dengan pakar-pakar dari majlis penasihat kami.
Perbincangan khas juga diadakan di Dewan Soma, Wisma Tun Sambanthan, Kuala Lumpur bagi membuka ruang kepada masyarakat berkongsi maklumat, mengemukakan kemusykilan dan mendapatkan penjelasan.
Balakrishnan pula menghantar sekitar 200 ahli kumpulannya ke majlis itu sebagai peserta. MHS menerima kehadiran mereka dengan tangan terbuka. Kami tidak sangka mereka akan menimbulkan kekecohan.
Sebelum sesi pertemuan, saya ada mengeluarkan kenyataan media menyelar tindakan Balakrishnan mengenakan bayaran RM730 kepada para pengikut. Pada pendirian saya, seorang swami, mahaguru, sittar atau guruji tidak akan menetapkan bayaran seperti itu.
Hasil siasatan dan maklumat yang diterima, Balakrishnan mengendalikan sesi ceramah motivasi selama sehari dengan menggunakan khidmat sekumpulan penceramah dan pakar motivasi.
Balakrishnan sendiri hanya muncul sekitar 15 minit dengan memakai kot dan tali leher. Guruji itu akan membaca mantera tertentu dan para hadirin dilaporkan bagaikan dipukau.
Selepas sesi khas 15 minit itu, Balakrishnan akan berangkat pergi. Baki sesi dikendalikan orang lain. Maka timbul persoalan di mana orang ramai tertanya-tanya apakah itu cara sebenar seorang guruji menyampaikan ilmu kepada para pengikutnya.
Maklumat yang diterima daripada sumber tertentu mendedahkan bahawa Balakrishnan pernah pergi ke Indonesia dan mempelajari ilmu pukau yang sangat berkesan. Tentu sahaja perbuatan seperti ini – jika benar – adalah bertentangan dengan ajaran Hindu.
Khabarnya sebagaimana dalam kes Datuk Guluji, peserta kursus Datuk Seri Guruji juga dikenakan bayaran tanpa resit. Apa komen Datuk?
Satu lagi kelemahan dan masalah etika yang dilihat secara nyata pada Balakrishnan adalah bahawa peserta dan pengikut yang membayar RM730 seorang tidak diberikan apa-apa resit atau pengesahan penerimaan bayaran.
Hasil siasatan juga mendapati bahawa syarikat Rajayoga Power Transcendental (RPT) yang digunakan untuk menjalankan kegiatan itu adalah milik Balakrishnan dan isterinya. Ia sebuah perniagaan yang berdaftar dengan Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM).
Anehnya, tiada resit dikeluarkan bagi bayaran yang diterima oleh syarikat perniagaan itu daripada “pelanggan”. Bayangkan bahawa setiap sesi dihadiri seribu orang. Jumlah wang tunai terkumpul dalam satu sesi adalah RM730,000 tanpa sebarang resit dan bukti bayaran diterima.
Katakanlah kos bersih mengendalikan keseluruhan sesi itu di PWTC adalah RM230,000. Maknanya, Balakrishnan mendapat keuntungan bersih tanpa resit dan tanpa dikenakan cukai sekitar RM500,000 bagi setiap sesi yang dikendalikan!
Pada masa sekarang, dia bukan sahaja mengendalikan sesi yang sama seperti itu di beberapa tempat di Malaysia, tetapi juga di Tamil Nadu, India. Khabarnya sudah ada pejabat di London dan Australia. Apa yang pasti, Balakrishnan yang dahulu menunggang basikal kini sudah menjadi jutawan melalui cara ini.
Berbalik kepada sesi taklimat di Dewan Soma, Datuk ada menyebut tentang kekecohan. …
Semasa sesi penerangan di Dewan Soma pada sekitar tahun 2002, lebih kurang 200 pengikut tegar Balakrishnan memang membuat kecoh dan marah-marah. Saya secara tegas mengatakan bahawa apa yang dilakukan oleh Balakrishnan adalah seratus peratus penipuan terancang.
Setiausaha MHS pada waktu itu juga menjawab pelbagai pertanyaan dengan berani berdasarkan fakta. Pengikut Balakrishnan yang hadir pada sesi itu nyaris-nyaris mahu memukulnya kerana tidak sanggup guruji mereka dikritik oleh sesiapa. Mereka seolah-olah dipukau dan tidak mampu berfikir secara rasional.
Pihak MHS dan beberapa orang kuat Balakrishnan berjaya meredakan keadaan. Kalaulah pada hari itu berlaku kekecohan yang tidak dapat dikawal atau jika setiausaha MHS dibelasah pengikut Balakrishnan, tentu kes telah menjadi besar.
Malah, secara retrospektif, kalaulah sesuatu yang di luar kawalan telah berlaku di Dewan Soma pada hari itu (sekitar 2002), tentu tindakan mengikut undang-undang sudah diambil ke atas Balakrishnan sebelum dia sempat menjadi jutawan yang berkuasa dan berpengaruh besar seperti sekarang.
Mungkin sahaja RPT tidak akan ada pada hari ini dan tidak akan ada mangsa yang menderita. Tentu ramai yang telah terselamat sebelum menjadi umpama kambing yang merelakan dirinya dikorbankan.
COMMENT
Saya menulis makalah bertajuk “Kisah Datuk Guluji” (FMT, 2 Disember 2013) dan “Lagi kisah Datuk Guluji” (FMT, 25 Januari 2014) berdasarkan maklumat yang disampaikan sejumlah individu yang pernah menjadi mangsa seorang penipu yang bertopengkan “guruji” iaitu guru agama Hindu.
Susulan daripada itu, surat pembaca turut disiarkan di FMT pada 6, 7, 10 dan 26 Disember 2013. Ramai juga yang menghubungi saya secara peribadi untuk berkongsi pengalaman sedih menjadi mangsa beberapa orang guruji.
Ternyata “Datuk Guluji” yang didedahkan menerusi makalah saya bukan satu-satunya individu yang menggunakan agama sebagai senjata dan alat untuk menipu orang dan mengaut keuntungan.
Pendedahan besar-besaran mengenai seorang individu bernama Balakrishnan Vellasamy atau “Datuk Seri Guruji” dilakukan secara amat berani oleh akhbar Tamil Malar pada pertengahan Disember 2013.
Susulan daripada pendedahan berani itu, pejabat akhbar berkenaan dilaporkan diserang sekumpulan penyokong tegar Balakrishnan. Saya kurang berpeluang mengikuti kisah itu kerana berada di Hat Yai, Thailand bersama-sama Kughan Nadarajah bagi “Kunjungan Kebudayaan Kavyan” (17-20 Disember 2013).
Makalah bertajuk “Kisah mangsa ‘guruji’ dibukukan” (FMT, 28 Disember 2013) pula ditulis berdasarkan pelbagai maklumat tambahan yang diterima serta pengalaman membaca buku yang ditulis seorang bekas mangsa seorang guruji.
Salah satu persoalan yang timbul adalah mengapa Malaysia Hindu Sangam (MHS) tidak kelihatan mengambil sebarang tindakan tegas membendung pelbagai ajaran sesat yang disebarkan beberapa individu dengan memanipulasi nama agama (istilah dalam konteks Bahasa Sanskrit, bukan Bahasa Malaysia).
Sehingga kini, saya masih menerima pelbagai aduan dan maklumat daripada orang ramai berhubung isu ajaran sesat ini. Ramai juga yang mempersoalkan kredibiliti MHS sedangkan ia badan tertinggi dalam soal agama Hindu di negara ini.
Maka, apabila berpelung bertemu bekas presiden MHS, Datuk A Vaithilingam di kediaman beliau di Petaling Jaya, baru-baru ini, saya tidak melepaskan peluang meminta pandangan beliau berhubung isu hangat ini.
Perbualan kami menggunakan Bahasa Tamil dan berikut adalah transkrip yang saya tulis berdasarkan rakaman sebahagian perbualan itu. Sekiranya timbul sebarang kekeliruan, harap maklum bahawa terjemahan saya mungkin sahaja tidak seratus peratus menggambarkan kata-kata sebenar dalam bahasa asal.
Vaithilingam: Saya antara individu yang paling awal mengeluarkan kenyataan menentang ajaran yang disebarkan itu.
Sebenarnya, pada sekitar tahun 1997, seorang individu dari Johor datang bertemu saya selaku presiden MHS dan mengadu telah menyerahkan wang sehingga RM3,000 kepada Balakrishnan.
Mangsa itu mengatakan bahawa apa-apa yang dijanjikan oleh Balakrishnan tidak menjadi kenyataan dan dia mahu wang dikembalikan. Guruji itu tidak mahu memulangkan wang dan mangsa membawa kes ke mahkamah.
Ini adalah kisah lama; sebelum Balakrishnan menjadi “Datuk Seri Guruji” yang kaya-raya dan berpengaruh besar seperti sekarang. Pada masa itu, dia masih menunggang basikal dari tempat ke tempat untuk menyebarkan ajarannya di Johor.
Sekitar dua tahun kemudian, saya mendapat tahu bahawa Balakrishnan telah menghubungi mangsa tadi dan merayu kes ditarik balik. Wang RM3,000 dipulangkan dan kes ditutup begitu sahaja.
Saya lalu membiarkan sahaja kes itu kerana dianggap sudah selesai. Akan tetapi, pada sekitar tahun 2002, aduan kembali diterima oleh MHS daripada beberapa orang.
Mangsa membuat laporan kepada kami bahawa mereka perlu membayar RM730 untuk menyertai suatu kursus motivasi keagamaan anjuran guruji itu.
Hasil maklumat yang diterima, kursus besar-besaran nampaknya diadakan di Pusat Dagangan Dunia Putra (PWTC), Kuala Lumpur dan agen-agen kepada Balakrishnan membawa peserta dari seluruh negara.
Sebagai individu yang memegang jawatan presiden MHS (1996-2009), saya mengadakan sesi perbincangan khas dengan pakar-pakar dari majlis penasihat kami.
Perbincangan khas juga diadakan di Dewan Soma, Wisma Tun Sambanthan, Kuala Lumpur bagi membuka ruang kepada masyarakat berkongsi maklumat, mengemukakan kemusykilan dan mendapatkan penjelasan.
Balakrishnan pula menghantar sekitar 200 ahli kumpulannya ke majlis itu sebagai peserta. MHS menerima kehadiran mereka dengan tangan terbuka. Kami tidak sangka mereka akan menimbulkan kekecohan.
Sebelum sesi pertemuan, saya ada mengeluarkan kenyataan media menyelar tindakan Balakrishnan mengenakan bayaran RM730 kepada para pengikut. Pada pendirian saya, seorang swami, mahaguru, sittar atau guruji tidak akan menetapkan bayaran seperti itu.
Hasil siasatan dan maklumat yang diterima, Balakrishnan mengendalikan sesi ceramah motivasi selama sehari dengan menggunakan khidmat sekumpulan penceramah dan pakar motivasi.
Balakrishnan sendiri hanya muncul sekitar 15 minit dengan memakai kot dan tali leher. Guruji itu akan membaca mantera tertentu dan para hadirin dilaporkan bagaikan dipukau.
Selepas sesi khas 15 minit itu, Balakrishnan akan berangkat pergi. Baki sesi dikendalikan orang lain. Maka timbul persoalan di mana orang ramai tertanya-tanya apakah itu cara sebenar seorang guruji menyampaikan ilmu kepada para pengikutnya.
Maklumat yang diterima daripada sumber tertentu mendedahkan bahawa Balakrishnan pernah pergi ke Indonesia dan mempelajari ilmu pukau yang sangat berkesan. Tentu sahaja perbuatan seperti ini – jika benar – adalah bertentangan dengan ajaran Hindu.
Khabarnya sebagaimana dalam kes Datuk Guluji, peserta kursus Datuk Seri Guruji juga dikenakan bayaran tanpa resit. Apa komen Datuk?
Satu lagi kelemahan dan masalah etika yang dilihat secara nyata pada Balakrishnan adalah bahawa peserta dan pengikut yang membayar RM730 seorang tidak diberikan apa-apa resit atau pengesahan penerimaan bayaran.
Hasil siasatan juga mendapati bahawa syarikat Rajayoga Power Transcendental (RPT) yang digunakan untuk menjalankan kegiatan itu adalah milik Balakrishnan dan isterinya. Ia sebuah perniagaan yang berdaftar dengan Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM).
Anehnya, tiada resit dikeluarkan bagi bayaran yang diterima oleh syarikat perniagaan itu daripada “pelanggan”. Bayangkan bahawa setiap sesi dihadiri seribu orang. Jumlah wang tunai terkumpul dalam satu sesi adalah RM730,000 tanpa sebarang resit dan bukti bayaran diterima.
Katakanlah kos bersih mengendalikan keseluruhan sesi itu di PWTC adalah RM230,000. Maknanya, Balakrishnan mendapat keuntungan bersih tanpa resit dan tanpa dikenakan cukai sekitar RM500,000 bagi setiap sesi yang dikendalikan!
Pada masa sekarang, dia bukan sahaja mengendalikan sesi yang sama seperti itu di beberapa tempat di Malaysia, tetapi juga di Tamil Nadu, India. Khabarnya sudah ada pejabat di London dan Australia. Apa yang pasti, Balakrishnan yang dahulu menunggang basikal kini sudah menjadi jutawan melalui cara ini.
Semasa sesi penerangan di Dewan Soma pada sekitar tahun 2002, lebih kurang 200 pengikut tegar Balakrishnan memang membuat kecoh dan marah-marah. Saya secara tegas mengatakan bahawa apa yang dilakukan oleh Balakrishnan adalah seratus peratus penipuan terancang.
Setiausaha MHS pada waktu itu juga menjawab pelbagai pertanyaan dengan berani berdasarkan fakta. Pengikut Balakrishnan yang hadir pada sesi itu nyaris-nyaris mahu memukulnya kerana tidak sanggup guruji mereka dikritik oleh sesiapa. Mereka seolah-olah dipukau dan tidak mampu berfikir secara rasional.
Pihak MHS dan beberapa orang kuat Balakrishnan berjaya meredakan keadaan. Kalaulah pada hari itu berlaku kekecohan yang tidak dapat dikawal atau jika setiausaha MHS dibelasah pengikut Balakrishnan, tentu kes telah menjadi besar.
Malah, secara retrospektif, kalaulah sesuatu yang di luar kawalan telah berlaku di Dewan Soma pada hari itu (sekitar 2002), tentu tindakan mengikut undang-undang sudah diambil ke atas Balakrishnan sebelum dia sempat menjadi jutawan yang berkuasa dan berpengaruh besar seperti sekarang.
Mungkin sahaja RPT tidak akan ada pada hari ini dan tidak akan ada mangsa yang menderita. Tentu ramai yang telah terselamat sebelum menjadi umpama kambing yang merelakan dirinya dikorbankan.
Labels:
Malaysian Indians
Kajang rep quits to pave way for Anwar?
(FMT) The plan to replace Selangor MB with Anwar gains momentum with Kajang rep stepping down.
UPDATED
PETALING JAYA: PKR’s Kajang state rep Lee Chin Cheh has resigned from the post with immediate effect, announced Selangor legislative assembly speaker Hannah Yeoh today.
She said Lee, a first-time state rep, submitted his resignation letter to the state assembly this morning. She added that he had not given reasons for his resignation.
Later in a statement issued through his party HQ, Lee said his decision was for the “common good and to strengthen Pakatan’s abilities to serve the people of Selangor”.
Party sources told FMT that Lee’s resignation will now enable PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim to contest in the ensuing by-election, and become the new Selangor Menteri Besar if he wins the by-election.
As reported by FMT on Saturday, this could be the party’s plan to solve the long-standing power struggle between incumbent MB Khalid Ibrahim and his nemesis Azmin Ali, who is the state PKR chief.
While no PKR leader had confirmed the plan, the fact that Lee tendered his resignation showed that the plan was well underway.
Sources told FMT that senior leaders in the party have agreed to it. PAS is also said to have approved Anwar as the new MB.
However the question remains if the Sultan of Selangor would approve it. Khalid’s office meanwhile told FMT earlier today that he was not resigning from his post.
Lee, 43, could not be contacted for comment at press time.
Anwar meanwhile will be holding a press conference tomorrow and is expected to touch on the issue.
Other sources are also speculating that either Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli or PKR secretary general Saifuddin Nasution could be picked by the party to be the candidate for Kajang, and then subsequently to assume the MB’s post.
UPDATED
She said Lee, a first-time state rep, submitted his resignation letter to the state assembly this morning. She added that he had not given reasons for his resignation.
Later in a statement issued through his party HQ, Lee said his decision was for the “common good and to strengthen Pakatan’s abilities to serve the people of Selangor”.
Party sources told FMT that Lee’s resignation will now enable PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim to contest in the ensuing by-election, and become the new Selangor Menteri Besar if he wins the by-election.
As reported by FMT on Saturday, this could be the party’s plan to solve the long-standing power struggle between incumbent MB Khalid Ibrahim and his nemesis Azmin Ali, who is the state PKR chief.
While no PKR leader had confirmed the plan, the fact that Lee tendered his resignation showed that the plan was well underway.
Sources told FMT that senior leaders in the party have agreed to it. PAS is also said to have approved Anwar as the new MB.
However the question remains if the Sultan of Selangor would approve it. Khalid’s office meanwhile told FMT earlier today that he was not resigning from his post.
Lee, 43, could not be contacted for comment at press time.
Anwar meanwhile will be holding a press conference tomorrow and is expected to touch on the issue.
Other sources are also speculating that either Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli or PKR secretary general Saifuddin Nasution could be picked by the party to be the candidate for Kajang, and then subsequently to assume the MB’s post.
Labels:
By Election-14
Why BN’s losing support – by Dr M
(FMT) The former PM blames liberalism, saying it goes against “fair sharing” of power and wealth.
PETALING JAYA: Support for the Barisan Nasional (BN) started going downhill after the 2004 election, when it began bowing to popular demand to adopt a more liberal attitude in politics and economics, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad said today.
“In other words, the idea of fair sharing of political power and economic wealth between the different races was terminated,” he wrote in a blog article.
“But in the 2008 elections it was manifestly clear that the BN had lost popularity instead. It scored less than two-thirds for the first time since 1969, gaining only 140 of the 222 seats.
“The pro-sharing Malays were dismayed but despite changing their leader, they found that the trend towards liberalisation remained.
“The belief of the new leadership was that Chinese support would come back if the sharing policies of the NEP were not implemented. Despite obviously rejecting the sharing principle, support for the BN did not return.”
He said DAP dangled before the Chinese the possibility of having both political and economic dominance and this was deemed possible because the Malays had split into three parties and each one of them needed Chinese support in order to win.
“The Chinese had the deciding vote and were in a position to give victory only to those who believe in throwing out the sharing concept.
“The slogan coined ‘Ini kalilah’ was used to indicate that political power could be wrested from the BN and the opposition would form the next government. This opposition government would discard the sharing principle.
“Many non-Malay supporters of the BN component parties were convinced that by withdrawing their support the BN would lose and so would the idea of sharing political and economic power between the races.”
Dr Mahathir said BN managed to scrape through with a reduced majority principally through the support of Malays and other indigenous peoples.
He said race relations in Malaysia were now “tense as never before” and he blamed liberalisation and a weakened government.
“The people show no respect for the government,” he added.
“Malaysians by and large are not violent people. But for how long can Malaysia remain stable in the face of persistent violation of the good understanding and the sharing of power between the races.
“Malaysian, be they Malays, Chinese, Indians or natives of Sabah and Sarawak, must banish from their minds the idea of racial dominance. This country must be shared and shared fair by all the races.”
Dr Mahathir said Malaysia was multiracial in the true sense of the word with Malaysians retaining their identification with their countries of origin or where their forebears came from.
“In no other country with a large number of citizens of foreign origin do we see this retention of previous identities,” he said.
“In other words, the idea of fair sharing of political power and economic wealth between the different races was terminated,” he wrote in a blog article.
“But in the 2008 elections it was manifestly clear that the BN had lost popularity instead. It scored less than two-thirds for the first time since 1969, gaining only 140 of the 222 seats.
“The pro-sharing Malays were dismayed but despite changing their leader, they found that the trend towards liberalisation remained.
“The belief of the new leadership was that Chinese support would come back if the sharing policies of the NEP were not implemented. Despite obviously rejecting the sharing principle, support for the BN did not return.”
He said DAP dangled before the Chinese the possibility of having both political and economic dominance and this was deemed possible because the Malays had split into three parties and each one of them needed Chinese support in order to win.
“The Chinese had the deciding vote and were in a position to give victory only to those who believe in throwing out the sharing concept.
“The slogan coined ‘Ini kalilah’ was used to indicate that political power could be wrested from the BN and the opposition would form the next government. This opposition government would discard the sharing principle.
“Many non-Malay supporters of the BN component parties were convinced that by withdrawing their support the BN would lose and so would the idea of sharing political and economic power between the races.”
Dr Mahathir said BN managed to scrape through with a reduced majority principally through the support of Malays and other indigenous peoples.
He said race relations in Malaysia were now “tense as never before” and he blamed liberalisation and a weakened government.
“The people show no respect for the government,” he added.
“Malaysians by and large are not violent people. But for how long can Malaysia remain stable in the face of persistent violation of the good understanding and the sharing of power between the races.
“Malaysian, be they Malays, Chinese, Indians or natives of Sabah and Sarawak, must banish from their minds the idea of racial dominance. This country must be shared and shared fair by all the races.”
Dr Mahathir said Malaysia was multiracial in the true sense of the word with Malaysians retaining their identification with their countries of origin or where their forebears came from.
“In no other country with a large number of citizens of foreign origin do we see this retention of previous identities,” he said.
Labels:
BN,
Tun.Mahathir
Khalid: I will resign if coalition’s leadership reaches consensus
However, he said to date there were no discussions by them on the matter.
“I can concede if the opposition coalition wants to replace me, but there have been no discussions on the matter till now,” he told reporters after attending the launching of the book “Maps of Malaya and Borneo: Discovery, Statehood and Progress” here today.
The book was launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
He was commenting on rumours that he was resigning as mentri besar to make way for opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to replace him, following speculation that Anwar will be contesting in the Kajang state seat.
Kajang state seat incumbent Lee Chin Cheh resigned as state assemblyman today.
Commenting on Lee’s resignation, Abdul Khalid said the matter was no surprise as he had heard of such talk.
“I am not at all surprised with Lee’s action as I have heard of it before,” he said.
The opposition coalition in Selangor is made up of the DAP, Parti Keadilan Rakyat and PAS,
Anwar, Khalid and Lee are from PKR.
Labels:
Selangor
Zaid: If Najib goes, who will be next PM?
(WikiSabah) - Known for his expertise in exterminating political careers, it is rumoured that Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s dagger is now pointed at Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.
Speculation is rife that there is a concerted effort spearheaded by the former premier to oust the current premier.
But former law minister Zaid Ibrahim questioned who would then succeed Najib?
“Those who want Najib to step down do not tell us who they want to succeed him. Some have touted the idea of a Ruling Council, presumably headed by Dr M,” he said in his blog.
“That would be ridiculous! Just because crazy Thai demonstrators are asking for the People’s Council to replace an elected PM, that does not mean we should follow their lead,” he added.
Zaid also shot down the possibility of Umno vice-president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi taking over the leadership reins.
“If Ahmad Zahid were to succeed Najib, do you really think we will be better off? Only if you want half the country to wear military uniforms, patrolling and monitoring the other half with armed weapons.
“It’s not enough for him that we have 300,000 Rela members – now he wants Syariah enforcement militias as well,” he added.
Weak reasons to demand Najib’s head
Zaid, a former Umno member, said Mahathir’s supporters have offered a reasoning that is “weak, even contrived at best” for Najib to step down.
“They say Najib has failed because the prices of goods and services have gone up, but we can expect this to happen when subsidies are cut. And subsidies have to be cut to reduce the deficit in the country’s accounts, which in turn has come from the government spending more than it received in revenue. This is a cumulative effect of many years of unsound economic management, and Najib is not solely to blame for this.
“The former prime minister’s fan club members also point to the more than 50,000 unemployed graduates in Malaysia as proof of Najib’s failure, but we have had this many (or more) unemployed or unemployable graduates since 1995.
“This is thanks to our insistence on wanting more Malays in the universities, regardless of the circumstances. We have given our schoolchildren innumerable As to please parents, but these students had to end up in universities somewhere. Umno likes to build universities all over the country and they can’t be left vacant. This is not Najib’s fault either,” he added.
Zaid also pointed out that Dr M’s supporters also castigate Najib for traveling in private jets.
However, he said this penchant for luxury living has been the lifestyle of all Malaysian prime ministers, except for the first three.
“Since then our PMs have all lived in style, going on holidays in private jets and sailing the high seas in their yachts (which they always claimed to belong to their friends). Najib is just following the trend, even if he has perhaps taken the matter of style a notch or two up. Still, it’s not sufficient grounds to remove him,” he added.
Zaid also dismissed the demand from this group for Najib to change as unrealistic and meaningless.
Zaid also dismissed the demand from this group for Najib to change as unrealistic and meaningless.
“What change can Najib possibly try to implement without upsetting Umno? Would Umno be happy if Najib were to remove the tolls, scrap APs and reduce cars prices? The same people asking for Najib’s removal would cry blue murder, and they would still demand his removal, this time for betraying the Malay race.
"Would they be happy if he woke up one morning and declared that the rule of law will be the order of the day? That the Official Secrets Act will be removed (except for matters of military and police intelligence)? That the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission will have the power to prosecute the corrupt without needing to get the blessing of the attorney-general? These same critics would not be happy," he added.
Zaid also denied that Najib's continued presence at the helm would put BN at risk of losing the next general election.
“This is again a remote possibility. BR1M3 is coming soon and Najib will be sure to have more of that before the next GE. His popularity will be restored.
"The wisdom of the saying ‘Melayu mudah lupa’ (The Malays forget easily) is not lost on our PM. Furthermore, the delineation exercise will somehow protect the present majority in Parliament and Najib will again win at the polls," he added.
Speculation is rife that there is a concerted effort spearheaded by the former premier to oust the current premier.
But former law minister Zaid Ibrahim questioned who would then succeed Najib?
“Those who want Najib to step down do not tell us who they want to succeed him. Some have touted the idea of a Ruling Council, presumably headed by Dr M,” he said in his blog.
“That would be ridiculous! Just because crazy Thai demonstrators are asking for the People’s Council to replace an elected PM, that does not mean we should follow their lead,” he added.
Zaid also shot down the possibility of Umno vice-president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi taking over the leadership reins.
“If Ahmad Zahid were to succeed Najib, do you really think we will be better off? Only if you want half the country to wear military uniforms, patrolling and monitoring the other half with armed weapons.
“It’s not enough for him that we have 300,000 Rela members – now he wants Syariah enforcement militias as well,” he added.
Weak reasons to demand Najib’s head
Zaid, a former Umno member, said Mahathir’s supporters have offered a reasoning that is “weak, even contrived at best” for Najib to step down.
“They say Najib has failed because the prices of goods and services have gone up, but we can expect this to happen when subsidies are cut. And subsidies have to be cut to reduce the deficit in the country’s accounts, which in turn has come from the government spending more than it received in revenue. This is a cumulative effect of many years of unsound economic management, and Najib is not solely to blame for this.
“The former prime minister’s fan club members also point to the more than 50,000 unemployed graduates in Malaysia as proof of Najib’s failure, but we have had this many (or more) unemployed or unemployable graduates since 1995.
“This is thanks to our insistence on wanting more Malays in the universities, regardless of the circumstances. We have given our schoolchildren innumerable As to please parents, but these students had to end up in universities somewhere. Umno likes to build universities all over the country and they can’t be left vacant. This is not Najib’s fault either,” he added.
Zaid also pointed out that Dr M’s supporters also castigate Najib for traveling in private jets.
However, he said this penchant for luxury living has been the lifestyle of all Malaysian prime ministers, except for the first three.
“Since then our PMs have all lived in style, going on holidays in private jets and sailing the high seas in their yachts (which they always claimed to belong to their friends). Najib is just following the trend, even if he has perhaps taken the matter of style a notch or two up. Still, it’s not sufficient grounds to remove him,” he added.
Zaid also dismissed the demand from this group for Najib to change as unrealistic and meaningless.
Zaid also dismissed the demand from this group for Najib to change as unrealistic and meaningless.
“What change can Najib possibly try to implement without upsetting Umno? Would Umno be happy if Najib were to remove the tolls, scrap APs and reduce cars prices? The same people asking for Najib’s removal would cry blue murder, and they would still demand his removal, this time for betraying the Malay race.
"Would they be happy if he woke up one morning and declared that the rule of law will be the order of the day? That the Official Secrets Act will be removed (except for matters of military and police intelligence)? That the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission will have the power to prosecute the corrupt without needing to get the blessing of the attorney-general? These same critics would not be happy," he added.
Zaid also denied that Najib's continued presence at the helm would put BN at risk of losing the next general election.
“This is again a remote possibility. BR1M3 is coming soon and Najib will be sure to have more of that before the next GE. His popularity will be restored.
"The wisdom of the saying ‘Melayu mudah lupa’ (The Malays forget easily) is not lost on our PM. Furthermore, the delineation exercise will somehow protect the present majority in Parliament and Najib will again win at the polls," he added.
Labels:
Najib,
Zaid Ibrahim
Playing with fire to spark riots with Allah banners
Churches
and Penang Umno have lodged reports over this provocative banner found
outside several churches in Penang. - Pic courtesy Anil Netto, January
27, 2014.
(TMI) Christians went for Sunday mass in Penang yesterday and found banners which read "Allah is Great, Jesus is the son of Allah" outside several churches, at a time when the mercury is rising over the use of the word "Allah" by non-Muslims.
In short, this was a most clumsy but dangerous attempt to spark riots between the majority Muslims and minority Christians in Malaysia.
Would any church display such banners openly when Islamic enforcement officers have seized Malay-language bibles containing the word Allah?
Yet, some people tried their luck at this in Penang over the weekend. No one knows who did it but it bears resemblance to orchestrated arson attacks on churches and the so-called reprisals against mosques in 2010.
But why are individuals and groups so brazenly lighting the fuse of religious and racial hatred?
Simple. Because they know that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is so weak and indecisive that he will stay silent on the sidelines.
Because they know that the police rarely, if ever, acts against individuals or groups aligned to the ruling coalition.
Remember the slap on the wrist for those arrested over the cow-head incident in Shah Alam in 2009? All they got was a paltry fine and a week in jail.
What do these groups expect to incite with their latest stunt? Angry Muslims and defensive Christians at war with each other over the banners? The Christians have been told not to react and leave it to the police.
Both Christians and Penang Umno have lodged reports, and now the police will have to investigate this stunt which makes all sides harden their stand on the word "Allah".
Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng rightly said yesterday that the banners were intended to increase tensions between Muslims and Christians, which spiked after the 2009 High Court ruling that allowed Catholic weekly Herald to use the word Allah in its Bahasa Malaysia section.
What happens now is up to the authorities and community leaders.
They have to take action and stop such people from causing more trouble in a country where people actually live in peace and harmony, if not for some who want Muslims and Christians to go to war for their own reasons.
It will be a sad day in Malaysia if we allow such people to continue committing such malicious and dangerous acts like what happened in Penang yesterday. - January 27, 2014.
Labels:
Allah issue
Call for an emergency Parliament during Chinese New Year period to address the “kangkung” crisis faced by the Prime Minister and the country, including attempts to incite racial and religious hatred to create another May 13
I call for an emergency meeting of Parliament during the Chinese New Year period to address the “kangkung” crisis faced by the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and the country, including blatant attempts by irresponsible and reckless elements to escalate the incitement of racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension to create the conditions for another May 13 racial riots in the country.
The throwing of two Molotov cocktails into the compound of the Church of the Assumption in Lebuh Farquhar, Penang, early this morning and the putting up of the provocative banner “Jesus is the son of Allah” without the knowledge of church authorities outside three churches in Penang yesterday by irresponsible and reckless elements out to escalate the incitement of racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension are the latest evidence of the existence of a treacherous conspiracy by a small group of traitors out to destabilize the country and cause a racial or religious conflagration.
The Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar could resort to the fairy tale that there was a conspiracy to topple the elected government on New Year’s Eve at Dataran Merdeka although there was no basis for such a wild allegation as there was only a peaceful gathering to protest price hikes.
Why is the IGP completely silent about the numerous attempts by reckless and irresponsible elements who are acting no different as traitors in the past few months out systematically to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension to create another May 13 in the country?
Is the IGP sleeping on his job? It is time that the IGP wake up and carry out his duty to the nation and the people to protect them from traitors who are prepared to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension to create another May 13 in the country.
Former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad said today that racial tensions are rising under a weak BN.
He is both right and wrong – right that the Barisan Nasional is weak and that is why the “kangkung” hullabaloo could resonate throughout the country and even become international news because of a rudderless, clueless and leaderless administration.
Wrong because a rudderless government is not caused by attempts by the Chinese to establish political and economic dominance over the Malays as repeatedly alleged by Mahathir.
In fact, if there is any single person who is responsible for the present state of affairs in Malaysia, it is Mahathir himself, who started even before the May 5 general elections last year to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tensions by for example alleging that I was contesting in Gelang Patah for the Chinese to confront the Malays and to destroy the power-sharing of Malays and Chinese in Malaysia – which were a sheer pack of lies.
The first step for Malaysia to restore normalcy is for irresponsible elements like Mahathir to stop their irresponsible inciting of racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension through lies and falsehoods.
I call for an emergency Parliament during Chinese New Year period to address the “kangkung” crisis faced by the Prime Minister and the country, including attempts to incite racial and religious hatred to create another May 13.
In 2008, former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah dissolved Parliament to hold the 12th general elections during the Chinese New Year period. If Parliament could be dissolved during the Chinese New Year period for a general elections to be held, there can be reason why an emergency meeting of Parliament cannot be held during the Chinese New Year period when the so many national issues are so imperative, urgent and pressing.
[Lim Kit Siang media Conference Statement after a Chinese New Year visit to Tangkak together with Johore DAP State Assemblymen Ee Chin Lee (Tangkak), Tan Hong Pin (Mengkibol) and Lim Eng Guan (Bekok) in Tangkak on Sunday, 26th January 2014 at 3 pm]
The throwing of two Molotov cocktails into the compound of the Church of the Assumption in Lebuh Farquhar, Penang, early this morning and the putting up of the provocative banner “Jesus is the son of Allah” without the knowledge of church authorities outside three churches in Penang yesterday by irresponsible and reckless elements out to escalate the incitement of racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension are the latest evidence of the existence of a treacherous conspiracy by a small group of traitors out to destabilize the country and cause a racial or religious conflagration.
The Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar could resort to the fairy tale that there was a conspiracy to topple the elected government on New Year’s Eve at Dataran Merdeka although there was no basis for such a wild allegation as there was only a peaceful gathering to protest price hikes.
Why is the IGP completely silent about the numerous attempts by reckless and irresponsible elements who are acting no different as traitors in the past few months out systematically to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension to create another May 13 in the country?
Is the IGP sleeping on his job? It is time that the IGP wake up and carry out his duty to the nation and the people to protect them from traitors who are prepared to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension to create another May 13 in the country.
Former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad said today that racial tensions are rising under a weak BN.
He is both right and wrong – right that the Barisan Nasional is weak and that is why the “kangkung” hullabaloo could resonate throughout the country and even become international news because of a rudderless, clueless and leaderless administration.
Wrong because a rudderless government is not caused by attempts by the Chinese to establish political and economic dominance over the Malays as repeatedly alleged by Mahathir.
In fact, if there is any single person who is responsible for the present state of affairs in Malaysia, it is Mahathir himself, who started even before the May 5 general elections last year to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tensions by for example alleging that I was contesting in Gelang Patah for the Chinese to confront the Malays and to destroy the power-sharing of Malays and Chinese in Malaysia – which were a sheer pack of lies.
The first step for Malaysia to restore normalcy is for irresponsible elements like Mahathir to stop their irresponsible inciting of racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension through lies and falsehoods.
I call for an emergency Parliament during Chinese New Year period to address the “kangkung” crisis faced by the Prime Minister and the country, including attempts to incite racial and religious hatred to create another May 13.
In 2008, former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah dissolved Parliament to hold the 12th general elections during the Chinese New Year period. If Parliament could be dissolved during the Chinese New Year period for a general elections to be held, there can be reason why an emergency meeting of Parliament cannot be held during the Chinese New Year period when the so many national issues are so imperative, urgent and pressing.
[Lim Kit Siang media Conference Statement after a Chinese New Year visit to Tangkak together with Johore DAP State Assemblymen Ee Chin Lee (Tangkak), Tan Hong Pin (Mengkibol) and Lim Eng Guan (Bekok) in Tangkak on Sunday, 26th January 2014 at 3 pm]
Labels:
DAP
Shariah police conflicts with Constitution, experts warn
The Malaysian Insider
by MD IZWAN
by MD IZWAN
Putrajaya's
proposal for a Shariah police force is in conflict with the Federal
Constitution as Islam is a state matter and there would be authority
issues with the national police force, say constitutional experts.
Lawyer Syahredzan Johan stressed that religious authorities and the police are two separate enforcement agencies in Malaysia.
"Both
these bodies have different tasks and responsibilities. If combined, it
is bound to create an issue because of their fields of authority," he
told The Malaysian Insider.
Syahredzan said religious agencies were under their respective states while the police were answerable to Putrajaya.
"The
formation of the Shariah police unit cannot come to be because the
Federal Constitution is clear on the division of authority between the
state and Federal government."
He
said if the Shariah police unit is set up, the government is clearly
overstepping their authority and overriding the Federal Constitution.
Syahredzan
noted that another potential problem was whether the police officers
seconded to the religious authorities would come under the ambit of the
state or federal law.
"This is because both the state and federal governments have different sets of rules," Syahredzan said.
He
questioned the authority and powers which to be vested in the police's
Shariah unit, wondering how the police could have authority in Islamic
issues.
On
Saturday, Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim)
director-general Datuk Othman Mustafa said the setting up of the police
Shariah unit would be finalised soon.
He
said the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (Jakim), the Home
Ministry and police would be meeting soon to discuss the matter.
Constitutional
expert Dr Abdul Aziz Bari criticised Putrajaya's decision to set up the
unit, saying the police were supposed to uphold internal security and
public order.
"I
do not think that religion falls within the realm of the police. How is
the Shariah police unit supposed to be included in the Police Act?"
"The police should just concentrate on upholding public order and enforcing the law," Abdul Aziz told The Malaysian Insider.
He said the proposal to set up such a unit was an attempt to increase the burden and pressure of the police force.
"They
have not even properly executed their primary responsibilities and
already have a lot of work. Do they need more on their plate?"
Abdul Aziz said there was no need to look for additional tasks when the present chores had not been completed.
Syahredzan meanwhile questioned the legality of setting up the police Shariah unit as it had never been mentioned in Parliament.
"How can the Federal government just make a snap decision without at least discussing the matter in Parliament?"
He
expressed concern that this was Putrajaya's snap reaction to tackle the
Shia issue and human rights coalition Comango, or Coalition of
Malaysian NGOs in the UPR Process
Umno leaders have labeled both as potential threats to the sanctity of Islam in Malaysia.
Meanwhile,
legal expert Associate Professor Dr Azmi Sharom said the formation of a
police Shariah unit was not certain yet as many issues had yet to be
resolved.
"We have to ask ourselves, do we need or want a moral police unit?" he told The Malaysian Insider. - January 27, 2014.
Labels:
syariah
Najib Wants Action Against Provocative Acts Threatening Racial, Religious Harmony
KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 27 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wants the authorities to take action to prevent provocative acts like the hanging of offending banners in Penang over the "Allah" issue, which could sour race and religious relations in the country.
The prime minister said the government always prioritised unity and harmony and would do whatever it could to preserve this situation through law enforcement.
However, he reminded that whatever action taken should be based on the rule of law.
"I hope there won't be any undesirable reaction to the (offending banner) incident as it can worsen the situation.
"Let the relevant authorities take further action. In times like this, we should be calm and not act irrationally as this can be detrimental to the country," he said after launching the book, 'Maps of Malaya and Borneo: Discovery, Statehood and Progress', here, Monday.
Najib was commenting on the hanging of provocative banners in front of churches in a number of locations in Penang over the "Allah" issue, which has aroused religious sentiments and caused uneasiness among the state's multiracial community.
Asked whether the authorities had not acted strictly enough, he said: "Let them investigate and take action accordingly, as we don't know who were responsible for the provocative act.
"We can guess but it may be off-target. That is why I hope all quarters will remain calm and not react rashly in this matter."
The prime minister said the government always prioritised unity and harmony and would do whatever it could to preserve this situation through law enforcement.
However, he reminded that whatever action taken should be based on the rule of law.
"I hope there won't be any undesirable reaction to the (offending banner) incident as it can worsen the situation.
"Let the relevant authorities take further action. In times like this, we should be calm and not act irrationally as this can be detrimental to the country," he said after launching the book, 'Maps of Malaya and Borneo: Discovery, Statehood and Progress', here, Monday.
Najib was commenting on the hanging of provocative banners in front of churches in a number of locations in Penang over the "Allah" issue, which has aroused religious sentiments and caused uneasiness among the state's multiracial community.
Asked whether the authorities had not acted strictly enough, he said: "Let them investigate and take action accordingly, as we don't know who were responsible for the provocative act.
"We can guess but it may be off-target. That is why I hope all quarters will remain calm and not react rashly in this matter."
Monday, 27 January 2014
Let’s talk, says Anwar as he again offers to meet with Barisan over racial and religious issues
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has once again reiterated his call for a dialogue with Barisan Nasional to address raging racial and religious issues, three days after making the same overture to the ruling coalition.
The opposition leader is moved to extend the olive branch again after many Malaysians expressed concern over increased tension in the country resulting from several racial and religious issues lately.
In calling for a national consensus, the former finance minister said leaders from both sides of the political divide must put aside all partisan concerns and show real leadership in easing the tension and working towards ameliorating the situation.
"Indeed, the time has come for us to reach a national consensus on these crucial issues that impact the sub-stratum of our identity as a nation.
"I call on you, my fellow Malaysians to rise and let your voices be heard. Let your voice of mutual respect and goodwill, your voice of understanding and trust, and your voice of unity and integration prevail over these voices of hatred, rancour, hostility and destruction," he said in his special address to all Malaysians in Petaling Jaya today.
In describing his address as a message "conceived in love for the nation and not in hate against anyone", Anwar lamented that the situation is no longer "tenable" as in the last few months, a series of circumstances and developments are fast eroding the cohesiveness that is crucial to the Malaysian identity.
"We must turn the corner from the path of increasing polarisation to the path of greater integration. We must stop the race baiting, put an end to this disease of incitement to religious intolerance and hatred, and join our hands in unity and togetherness," he said.
He said it is morally incumbent on leaders, to go beyond partisan lines and come to a national consensus - which can also include issues like the country's economy, corruption and rising cost of living - on how to move the nation forward.
In the run-up to 2014, tensions flared again over the use of the Arabic word Allah by non-Muslims, with Muslim groups insisting the word is exclusive to Islam.
It culminated in the Selangor Islamic Religious Department’s (Jais) raid of the Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM) office in Petaling Jaya on January 2, and seizure of more than 300 copies of Bibles in Malay and Iban language. Two BSM officials were detained and their statements recorded.
Although international Islamic scholars have clarified that the term is not exclusive to Islam, state Islamic authorities in Malaysia have reacted negatively to reports of churches using the word Allah in services and literature catering to the Bahasa Malaysia-speaking Christian community.
However, critics have claimed that the entire controversy was an attempt to deflect attention from the country’s economic problems such as the rising cost of living due to price hikes and subsidy cuts. – January 26, 2014.
Hindu Elements in Indian Constitution.
Hindu Elements in Indian Constitution. The implication of Hindu Culture and Tradition in Indian Constitution.
The partition of India in 1947, made this
unique land of cultural unity divided into two pieces on the basis of
two nation theory, Hindu-Muslim basis which was undesirable to the
majority people. But, the communal minority Muslims procured their holy
land of Pakistan on the strength swords and the cunning politics in
connivance of the British who adopted ‘divide-&-rule’ policy.
Though least blood shedder and the
minimum trouble taker Muslim conspirators materialized their holy land
Pakistan even trough bloody direct action against the majority Hindus,
the largest contributors of freedom struggle, the Hindus did not get the
a Hindu India in return.
In contrary, the band of Muslim leaguers
stayed in India only to have more slice of bread from Hindu’s share.
The Muslims who did not leave this country showing their so-called
secular mentality at the time of partition, were not the patriot people,
one can misunderstand the reality. But, they took a risk to stay here
to form another movement of partition whenever it would be possible.
Kashmir to Kerala, Hyderabad to Muzaffarbad, we have sufficient
evidences to make it clear.
To strangulate the Hindu voice to raise a
demand of Hindu Rashtra in India, a long series of agents were present
in the Constitute Assembly and Drafting Committee for adopting a Non
Hindu texture of Indian Constitution.
God saved us as at least three true
nationalists were present in the Constitute Assembly and Drafting
Committee to adopt some deliberate actions in favour of the majority
people and Hindu Nature of this ancient land. Sardar Vallabh Bhai
Patel, Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar and Dr Shyama Prashad Mookerjee acted
fortunately in favour of the majority sentiments in this land, where the
Hindu sentiment was the most unwanted subject in Indian politics.
As Indian Constitution says the measures
of ‘prohibiting the slaughter of cows’ as to protect it as a tradition
of this land or otherwise adopting such provisions of ‘Rights’,
‘directive principals’ or other mechanism to rule this land, has been
derived from Hindu Values and put into it as to check the further
division to protect the statute and texture of the Bharatiyata of the
people of this land.
Then Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi tried
to please her communist friends and the international Russian lobby by
inserting ‘Socialist’ and evidently tried to please the communal forces
in Muslim and Christian community by inserting ‘Secular’, so that this
Constitution would be a powerless fallacy for any Hindu rights or
empowerment.
As told by me by late Pabitra Kumar
Ghosh, a veteran journalist in Bengali media that Smt. Gandhi then tried
to delete the pictures from the original copy of Indian Constitution as
provoked by the communists and the communalists but it could be
possible by relying the intelligence reports as it might be a great
retaliation as an aftermath from the patriotic forces.
Most of the students and concerned
readers do not know even the pictures illustrated in its original copy
of the hand written Constitution of India. Such books are also not
available in the market containing the pictures of Indian Constitution.
The calligraphy in the original constitution was done by Prem Behari
Narain Raizda. It was illuminated by Nandalal Bose and other artists,
published by Dehra Dun, and photolithographed at the Survey of India
Offices.
Every picture drawn in every Part of the
Constitution of India has its own relevance and significance. The Part I
of The Union and its Territory starts with the Seal of Mahanjadaro.
The seal emblems with the traditional Oxen worship in India. Part II,
Citizenship starts with the scene reflecting the Vedic Tradition of
Yajna tradition in India; Chapter III, Fundamental Rights starts with
the win of Truth and faith over the evil power by depicting the picture
of Lanka Vijay; Part IV, Directive Principles of State Policy reflects
of the knowledge of Gita as exhorted by Lord Krishan; Part V, The Union
depicts the picture of the Sangha established by Lord Buddha, Part VI,
The states in Part A.. shows the picture of Tirthankar Mahavir, picture
of Nataraj in Part XII and so on. One cannot deny the significance of
these pictures in relation of Indian culture and heritage in the context
of the philosophy of Indian Constitution.
Only two contemporary Indian icons of
freedom struggle have been included in the Constitution. They are
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (two pics, one of Dandi March and other is
Noakhali Hindu Carnage visit) and Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose (one pic
of role of Netaji and Indian National Army in Indian Freedom Struggle).
Two controversial pictures of Muslims Akbar and Tipu Sultan are also
included in it. Akbar’s role to capsize the warrior Rajput power and
Tipu’s role for Hindu massacre are always debatable points in the Indian
history.
But, in no way the Hindu significance of
the Holy Indian Constitution can be denied. This generation and the next
must know it with full deliberation.
All the pictures preserved in the World Digital Library is reproduced here-under with due courtesy to the authority.
Picture Courtesy: World Digital Library.
Labels:
India
Yemeni held for forcing 8-year-old to marry
Yemen’s police arrested a local man after he forced his eight-year-old daughter to marry a 30-year-old man because of his wealth.
Newspapers said Afnan Al Shibani’s relatives, who were strongly opposed to the marriage, reported him to the police after they failed to dissuade him.
Police raided Al Shibani’s house in the southern town of Ibb and arrested him a few days before the wedding on Thursday. Police then handed the girl to her uncle.
Newspapers said the girl is just below eight years of age and is in the second class in the primary school in the province.
http://www.emirates247.com/news/region/yemeni-held-for-forcing-8-year-old-to-marry-2014-01-26-1.536078
Newspapers said Afnan Al Shibani’s relatives, who were strongly opposed to the marriage, reported him to the police after they failed to dissuade him.
Police raided Al Shibani’s house in the southern town of Ibb and arrested him a few days before the wedding on Thursday. Police then handed the girl to her uncle.
Newspapers said the girl is just below eight years of age and is in the second class in the primary school in the province.
http://www.emirates247.com/news/region/yemeni-held-for-forcing-8-year-old-to-marry-2014-01-26-1.536078
Labels:
Islam Discrimination
The shoes I walk in: Minorities blame growing discrimination for the loss of a feeling of fellowship
A speaker, M Prakash, said that there were 350 temples
and gurdwaras in Sindh but only five to 10 were owned by them.
KARACHI: In 1947, there were a 100 Parsi families living in Quetta. Today, there are only two.
“This figure alone tells the deplorable state of minorities in the country,” aptly concluded Justice (retd) Mehta Kailash Nath Kohli, the keynote speaker on the first day of a two-day workshop, ‘Status of Religious Minorities in Pakistan: Challenges and Response’, organised by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) at the Avari Towers on Saturday.
The judge, who hails from Quetta, spoke how his community members — the Hindus — are being abducted and kidnapped. “Since Pakistan’s inception, not a single law has been legislated in favour of religious minorities,” he added.
Human rights defenders from Palestine, France, Indonesia and Philippines gravely listened to the woes of the minorities.
The issue of land grabbing of the houses of worships and properties by the Evacuee Trust Property Board also became a part of the discussion. Lawyer Rochi Ram claimed that one-million acre land in Badin, Umerkot and Tharparkar was left behind by the Hindus but the land was no longer under the community’s ownership. “The government takes over the land and gives it on lease. Many burial places belong to the non-Muslims but we are not allowed to bury the bodies over there.”
A speaker, M Prakash, said that there were 350 temples and gurdwaras in Sindh but only five to 10 were owned by them. Minority members pointed out how discussions over the misuse of the blasphemy law have disappeared from the forefront. “We have forwarded recommendations to the government on how can we stop the misuse of this law,” said father Emmanuel Yousaf.
Another participant, Jaipal Chhabria, lamented that there was not a single Christian parliamentarian in Sindh Assembly. “Bilawal Bhutto dreams of having a Christian prime minster but his government did not to make the required amendments to allow minorities to hold important positions.”
He frowned that the media showed Hindus as opportunists. HRCP’s vice-chairperson Amarnath Motumal discussed how personal laws and marriage rights of their community were being completely ignored. “The courts do not recognise our rights. Even seven-year-old girls are being converted.”
Pushpa Kumari broke down into tears as she narrated the incident when a body of a 17-year-old girl was taken out from a graveyard because she was buried in a Muslim graveyard.
Carrying a bunch of newspapers dated last week, she said, “There are five cases of sexual harassment of Hindu women in Sindh, including the gang rape of a teenager.”
Kumari said that recently the government released 39 bonded labourers of the Hindu community, but asked would it take their responsibility. She narrated how in 1996, she was told to quit her job at the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission because their policy did not allow Hindus to work there.
A Sikh community member, Sardar Kalyan Singh, said that when they go to Peshawar or FATA, they have to pay Jizyah, which is sometimes Rs25,000, per person per year.
“Two days ago, a member of the Sikh community was killed because he refused to pay Jizya. When we spoke to the minister, he said that he is being forced to pay the same, so we should abide.”
A member of the Ahmadi community, Amir Mahmood, called for elimination of the anti-Ahmadi Ordinance.
Barkat Ali from the Hazara community said that he had lost his cousin in the recent attack on Hazara pilgrims. “We are left with no hope and we think the government is not serious about solving anything.”
Bigger picture: Foreign activists paint dismal picture
Foreign human rights defenders also shared the situation in their countries. Ihsan Ali Fauzi, a researcher at the Center for the Study of Religion and Demonstration in Indonesia, said that since 2006, discrimination and violence against Ahmadis, Biharis, Christians and Shias had increased.
Through his presentation, he shared that attacks on minorities have risen from 216 in 2010 to 244 in 2011. Fauzi said that the blasphemy law which came into existence in Indonesia in 2008, and the laws pertaining to seeking permission before building a house of worship led towards religious intolerance.
Present at the HRCP workshop, Palestinian Al-Haq’s general-director Shawan Jabarin, said that Pakistan’s government was not doing enough to tackle the human rights violations in the country.
“I feel that the government is not playing its part. The people here should be free from fear and enjoy freedom,” said Jabarin, who since 1987 has been fighting for the rights of his people back at home.
Jabarin, who also holds a Masters degree in International Human Rights Law, said that Al-Haq was founded in 1979 and is the first human rights organisation in the Middle East region. His organisation dealt with policies instead of isolated cases.
Jabarin is a firm believer of self-determination, and feels that people all over the world should be entitled to their right. “Back home, our people are not enjoying self-determination. They face property destruction and killings. We are struggling but one day we will get there. This is what we learn from history.”
Published in The Express Tribune, January 26th, 2014.
Labels:
Pakistan
Chinese ships patrol area contested by Malaysia
This latest act of aggression by China is a slap in the face of the Najib administration that has talked up China's benign intentions in Asean meetings as well as touted Malaysia's special ties with Beijing.
James Shoal is located about 80km from Sarawak, however, Beijing regards it as the southernmost part of the country's territory.
The Chinese vessels comprised an amphibious landing craft, the Changbaishan, and two destroyers, state news agency Xinhua said.
"During the ceremony held in the Zengmu Reef area, soldiers and officers aboard swore an oath of determination to safeguard the country's sovereignty and maritime interests," Xinhua said. Zengmu Reef is the Chinese term for James Shoal.
Xinhua said the fleet commander Jiang Weilie "urged soldiers and officers to always be prepared to fight, improve combat capabilities and lead the forces to help build the country into a maritime power".
China is in an increasingly angry dispute with its neighbours over claims to parts of the potentially oil and gas-rich South China Sea. China lays claim to almost the whole of the sea, which is criss-crossed by crucial shipping lanes.
Last March, Malaysia protested against the incursion of four Chinese ships in James Shoal. Chinese sailors fired guns in the air during the visit to the shoal.
In April, a Chinese maritime surveillance ship returned to James Shoal to leave behind steel markers to assert its claim.
China upset the Philippines and the United States this month when rules went into force demanding fishing boats seek permission to enter waters under the jurisdiction of China's southern province of Hainan, an area the provincial government says covers much of the South China Sea.
Vietnam, Taiwan, Brunei, Malaysia and the Philippines also claim other parts of the South China Sea. China has a separate dispute with Japan in the East China Sea. - January 26, 2014.
Former Johor sultanah appeals on 'divorce'
This follows lawyers acting for Tuanku Zanariah filing a notice of appeal today at the Johor Syariah Court of Appeal.
Six days ago the Syariah High Court refused to review a decision by the Syariah lower court that recognised the divorce.
This follows the Johor Syariah High Court ruling that it had to abide by the Johor fatwa committee's decision in 2010 that announced the divorce as valid, even though the application was made after the late Sultan Mahmud Iskandar passed away earlier that year.
The Johor Syariah High court also issued a gag order on those in the public gallery not to report the decision outside.
The notice of appeal today was filed by the firm of Kamar Ainiah Raziff & Zashidi. With this, the Johor High Court will have to prepare the written grounds of the decision it made on Jan 20 and following that the grounds of appeal will be filed.
The two were married on Aug 19, 1961. It was Mahmud Iskandar's second marriage.
Notified of divorce after sultan's death
Tuanku Zanariah's plight began in August last year when she received a letter from Johor mufti Mohd Tahrir Syamsuddin, along with three other documents including a divorce certificate dated Oct 8, 2010, that said the divorce took place on Jan 23, 2009.
The final document was from the Lower Syariah Court dated Sept 30, 2010 that affirmed the divorce.
Sultan Mahmud passed away on Jan 22, 2010.
Tuanku Zanariah claimed that the divorce is not valid and wants the Syariah lower court order to be set aside as she was not called for any divorce proceedings.
She wants the court to investigate whether her late husband's proclamation in Jan 2009 that was allegedly witnessed by Abdul Ghani and the Johor Royal Committee chairperson Tengku Osman Tunku Temenggong Ahmad, was valid, based on a statutory declaration they made.
"A person who passed away on Jan 22, 2010 does not have the legal capacity to initiate any court proceedings unless it is for the administration of its estate.
"Furthermore, during his lifetime the sultan had not filed for any divorce proceedings at any Johor syariah court against me,” she said in court documents challenging the divorce.
Her title as sultanah was also revoked.
Labels:
Rulers of Malaysia
Transferred: Teacher who fed grass to student
A primary school teacher in Sungkai, Perak who forced two students to consume grass as punishment has been transferred to another school.
Director-General of the Education Department Khair Mohamad Yusof said the teacher who shamed the students will be served with a warning letter for being excessive.
He said investigation by the Perak Education Department found that the action by the teacher had tarnished the good image of the Ministry of Education.
"As primary school students, they should be given guidance," he said in a statement today.
Khair said failing to complete school work is not a disciplinary offence but part of the teaching and learning process that should be addressed via continuous guidance.
In the incident at Khai Meng Chinese National Type School (SJKC) on Friday, an English language teacher had punished two students in year four for failing to complete their homework.
Action by the 26-year-old teacher caused the mothers of the two students to lodge police reports at Sungkai police station yesterday.
The issue prompted the Perak Welfare Department to provide counseling to the two students to help them regain their enthusiasm for school tomorrow.
– Bernama
Director-General of the Education Department Khair Mohamad Yusof said the teacher who shamed the students will be served with a warning letter for being excessive.
He said investigation by the Perak Education Department found that the action by the teacher had tarnished the good image of the Ministry of Education.
"As primary school students, they should be given guidance," he said in a statement today.
Khair said failing to complete school work is not a disciplinary offence but part of the teaching and learning process that should be addressed via continuous guidance.
In the incident at Khai Meng Chinese National Type School (SJKC) on Friday, an English language teacher had punished two students in year four for failing to complete their homework.
Action by the 26-year-old teacher caused the mothers of the two students to lodge police reports at Sungkai police station yesterday.
The issue prompted the Perak Welfare Department to provide counseling to the two students to help them regain their enthusiasm for school tomorrow.
– Bernama
Labels:
Education
Uthaya infected from 'unhygienic' conditions
Hindraf leader P Uthayakumar says he has
contracted scabies due to unhygienic conditions at the Kajang Prison,
and appeals to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and Home Minister Zahid
Hamidi to intervene in the matter.
He said the disease has afflicted several areas of his body - including his hands, legs, and buttocks - after being quarantined within the death row chambers for eight days from Jan 15, causing sleepless nights and bleeding from having scratched the infected skin.
“In the circumstances, I hereby urge your good selves to make a surprise visit to Kajang Prison.
“I would be more than happy to show your good selves the dirty blocks, the victims and the other prison abuses and shortcomings as per my complaints in the Official Request books,” he wrote in a letter to the duo, dated Jan 25.
The
letter was also sent to Prison Department director-general Zulkifli
Omar, and had been made available to media by his family.
In the letter, Uthayakumar (right) claimed that the scabies had afflicted some 30 percent of Kajang prisoners - naming several of them - and pointed out that the disease had also spread to the private parts of a prisoner at an adjacent cell.
“I dread thinking of Subramaniam (28) of Ayer Tawar, Perak who in 2006 died of septicaemia (blood poisoning) arising from scabies at the Air Molek Prison.
“On behalf of the family (of Subramaniam), I had filed a civil suit - but as usual - which was struck off. Now I myself do not want to be part of these statistics! Please Mr. Prime Minister, we are dealing with human lives here,” he pleaded.
Scabies is a disease characterised by intense itching and allergic reactions, caused by microscopic mites burrowing under the skin.
‘Why the eight-day quarantine?’
Uthayakumar, who had been sentenced to two-and-a-half years’ jail time for a conviction under the Sedition Act last June, was already afflicted by chronic diseases prior to his imprisonment.
These include diabetes, arthritis, and a prolapsed disc in his spine.
Uthayakumar also questioned the necessity of placing him under an eight-day quarantine, whereas Kajang Prison regulations - displayed at its entrance - stipulate only three days.
“If the smuggling-in of drugs and tobacco is the reason, why not a simple portable X-ray machine costing a mere RM8,000?” he said.
In addition, he noted that the prison conditions would have been better if the prison director and the prison doctor had inspected the prisons regularly, as stipulated by the same regulations.
“Almost all the prisoners had never seen the director or the doctor in their prison blocks, let alone ever having seen the director - (which is) pertinent because he is the prison’s CEO,” he said.
He claims that under Regulation 203, the prison director is supposed to inspect the prison at least once a day, and that the doctor is expected to make “periodic visits” under Regulation 236.
He said the disease has afflicted several areas of his body - including his hands, legs, and buttocks - after being quarantined within the death row chambers for eight days from Jan 15, causing sleepless nights and bleeding from having scratched the infected skin.
“In the circumstances, I hereby urge your good selves to make a surprise visit to Kajang Prison.
“I would be more than happy to show your good selves the dirty blocks, the victims and the other prison abuses and shortcomings as per my complaints in the Official Request books,” he wrote in a letter to the duo, dated Jan 25.
In the letter, Uthayakumar (right) claimed that the scabies had afflicted some 30 percent of Kajang prisoners - naming several of them - and pointed out that the disease had also spread to the private parts of a prisoner at an adjacent cell.
“I dread thinking of Subramaniam (28) of Ayer Tawar, Perak who in 2006 died of septicaemia (blood poisoning) arising from scabies at the Air Molek Prison.
“On behalf of the family (of Subramaniam), I had filed a civil suit - but as usual - which was struck off. Now I myself do not want to be part of these statistics! Please Mr. Prime Minister, we are dealing with human lives here,” he pleaded.
Scabies is a disease characterised by intense itching and allergic reactions, caused by microscopic mites burrowing under the skin.
‘Why the eight-day quarantine?’
Uthayakumar, who had been sentenced to two-and-a-half years’ jail time for a conviction under the Sedition Act last June, was already afflicted by chronic diseases prior to his imprisonment.
These include diabetes, arthritis, and a prolapsed disc in his spine.
Uthayakumar also questioned the necessity of placing him under an eight-day quarantine, whereas Kajang Prison regulations - displayed at its entrance - stipulate only three days.
“If the smuggling-in of drugs and tobacco is the reason, why not a simple portable X-ray machine costing a mere RM8,000?” he said.
In addition, he noted that the prison conditions would have been better if the prison director and the prison doctor had inspected the prisons regularly, as stipulated by the same regulations.
“Almost all the prisoners had never seen the director or the doctor in their prison blocks, let alone ever having seen the director - (which is) pertinent because he is the prison’s CEO,” he said.
He claims that under Regulation 203, the prison director is supposed to inspect the prison at least once a day, and that the doctor is expected to make “periodic visits” under Regulation 236.
Labels:
uthaya HRP
Perkasa mahu Sinar Harian batalkan debat Noh-Khalid Samad - FMT
Untuk kebaikan Islam tidak perlu debat di antara mereka
PETALING JAYA: Perkasa mahu Sinar Harian membatalkan debat antara Pengerusi Badan Perhubungan Umno Selangor, Datuk Seri Noh Omar dengan ahli parlimen Shah Alam, Khalid Samad.
Menurut Presiden Perkasa, Datuk Ibrahim Ali, untuk kebaikan Islam, tidak perlu debat antara mereka mengenai isu kalimah Allah daripada aspek undang-undang.
Katanya, debat ini akan banyak mudaratnya dan keburukan kepada Islam.
“Ianya tidak setakat undang-undang. ianya akan jadi debat politik kalimah Allah,” katanya kepada FMT.
Bekas ahli parlimen Pasir Mas itu menambah memang terbukti dengan langkah itu bahawa ahli politik dan akal fikiran tiada kena mengena dengn satu sama lain.
“Terus terang debat yang ingin dibuat itu menghina mahkamah, kerana kes ini masih dibicarakan di mahkamah tidak boleh dibincang atau diulas oleh mana-,mana pihak,” katanya.
Ibrahim berkata siapa yang menjadi penasihat kepada mereka berdua ini manakala akhbar Sinar Harian seperti biasa mendapat keuntungan dan perhatian lebih ut,a daripada Islam.
“Fikirlah sebelum banyak lagi kekeliruan sesama Islam dan bukan Islam bertepuk tangan,” katanya lagi yang menghantar sms dari Mekah.
Menurut Presiden Perkasa, Datuk Ibrahim Ali, untuk kebaikan Islam, tidak perlu debat antara mereka mengenai isu kalimah Allah daripada aspek undang-undang.
Katanya, debat ini akan banyak mudaratnya dan keburukan kepada Islam.
“Ianya tidak setakat undang-undang. ianya akan jadi debat politik kalimah Allah,” katanya kepada FMT.
Bekas ahli parlimen Pasir Mas itu menambah memang terbukti dengan langkah itu bahawa ahli politik dan akal fikiran tiada kena mengena dengn satu sama lain.
“Terus terang debat yang ingin dibuat itu menghina mahkamah, kerana kes ini masih dibicarakan di mahkamah tidak boleh dibincang atau diulas oleh mana-,mana pihak,” katanya.
Ibrahim berkata siapa yang menjadi penasihat kepada mereka berdua ini manakala akhbar Sinar Harian seperti biasa mendapat keuntungan dan perhatian lebih ut,a daripada Islam.
“Fikirlah sebelum banyak lagi kekeliruan sesama Islam dan bukan Islam bertepuk tangan,” katanya lagi yang menghantar sms dari Mekah.
Labels:
Allah issue,
Perkasa
‘Najib is capable, no need for Dr M’
A Sabah Umno leader says Najib can handle the nation's economy, and dismisses recent call for the return of Mahathir.
KOTA KINABALU: Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is capable of managing and handling the national economy well, said Sabah Umno deputy chief Salleh Said Keruak.
As such, he said the recent call by former information minister Zainuddin Maidin for former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to be appointed as Minister Mentor to tackle various issues affecting the country, particularly economy was inappropriate and unnecessary.
Although Zainuddin was entitled to his views, Salleh opined that Mahathir could aptly convey his advice to the government through appropriate channel, and it was not necessarily “by way of appointment as senior minister or Minister Mentor in the federal cabinet”.
“Our Prime Minister (Najib) is handling the economic situation very well albeit in a different approach…Mahathir’s era is different from Najib’s. Economic recipe might also not be the same.
“What is happening now is that the opposition is trying to manipulate or capitalise on various issues engulfing the country, including economy.
“There are also certain quarters (dissident leaders from within) expressing different views in tackling economic problems. We respect their views….but at the same time let us give Najib a chance to continue or carry out his reforms or economic policies.
“I believe Najib is genuinely sincere in wanting to get the reforms going in the larger interest of the nation and people, ” he said.
Salleh, who is also Sabah Legislative Assembly Speaker said this after launching the Dalamalee boutique at King Fisher Park, near here today.
Zainuddin was recently quoted as calling for a return of Mahathir to Putrajaya to help the Barisan Nasional federal government tackle raging racial, religious and economic issues.
Zainuddin said the proposal was not for Dr Mahathir, Malaysia’s longest-serving prime minister, to take over the stewardship of the country from Najib, but to help Najib face issues that are engulfing the country.
Salleh asserted that Najib inherited fundamental economic problems that needed to be resolved wholeheartedly for the good of the people and the country.
“I am confident, Insyallah, the people will support the government’s initiatives for the common good,” he said, urging the people to rallly behind Najib’s government.
As such, he said the recent call by former information minister Zainuddin Maidin for former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to be appointed as Minister Mentor to tackle various issues affecting the country, particularly economy was inappropriate and unnecessary.
Although Zainuddin was entitled to his views, Salleh opined that Mahathir could aptly convey his advice to the government through appropriate channel, and it was not necessarily “by way of appointment as senior minister or Minister Mentor in the federal cabinet”.
“Our Prime Minister (Najib) is handling the economic situation very well albeit in a different approach…Mahathir’s era is different from Najib’s. Economic recipe might also not be the same.
“What is happening now is that the opposition is trying to manipulate or capitalise on various issues engulfing the country, including economy.
“There are also certain quarters (dissident leaders from within) expressing different views in tackling economic problems. We respect their views….but at the same time let us give Najib a chance to continue or carry out his reforms or economic policies.
“I believe Najib is genuinely sincere in wanting to get the reforms going in the larger interest of the nation and people, ” he said.
Salleh, who is also Sabah Legislative Assembly Speaker said this after launching the Dalamalee boutique at King Fisher Park, near here today.
Zainuddin was recently quoted as calling for a return of Mahathir to Putrajaya to help the Barisan Nasional federal government tackle raging racial, religious and economic issues.
Zainuddin said the proposal was not for Dr Mahathir, Malaysia’s longest-serving prime minister, to take over the stewardship of the country from Najib, but to help Najib face issues that are engulfing the country.
Salleh asserted that Najib inherited fundamental economic problems that needed to be resolved wholeheartedly for the good of the people and the country.
“I am confident, Insyallah, the people will support the government’s initiatives for the common good,” he said, urging the people to rallly behind Najib’s government.
Labels:
Najib,
Tun.Mahathir
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
