Saturday, 9 August 2014
‘Enemies’ using internet to attack Islam, warns Jakim
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 8 — Federal Islamic authorities today joined the call for online attacks against Islam to be punished severely, following recent complaints that authorities were…
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 8 — Federal Islamic authorities today joined the call for online attacks against Islam to be punished severely, following recent complaints that authorities were not vigorously pursuing non-Muslims for such activities.
Telling Muslims they were duty-bound to defend Islam against threats and insults proliferating on the Internet, the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim) said these actions were against religion and the law, and urged for a crackdown against such cyber-attacks.
In its weekly Friday sermon, Jakim alleged of numerous cases where social media and communications technology have been used to demean Islam, belittle Malay sensitivities and insult the Malay Rulers.
“The actions of these groups pushes the limits of Muslims’ patience. With all sorts of insults before this, we no longer want any rude and uncivilised statements or actions by any party to pass without stiff action and maximum punishment under existing laws,” read the sermon, posted on Jakim’s website.
“Stiff and prompt action by the authorities is necessary so that this is not repeated and serves as a lesson to all to not play with fire and go overboard,” it added.
The sermon called on all Muslims to take up the role and responsibility of standing up to the challenge posed by Islam’s cyber-enemies, using “whatever reasonable means” including social media to protect the position of Muslims, especially in Malaysia.
It also urged Muslims not to be taken by the provocation they came across online, stressing the need for each and every Muslim to have a deep understanding of Islam while building their spiritual fortitude, knowledge, intellect, political maturity and unity among the faithful.
Jakim’s message comes amid a backdrop of recent complaints against the police, the Attorney-General’s Chambers, and the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) over perceived inaction against alleged non-Muslim attacks against Islam.
Detractors such as Umno Youth and the Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia daily have accused the agencies of “selective action”, contrasting the prosecution of a Malay road bully and Muslim preacher against the case of a Facebook user who remains at large despite a derogatory remark aimed at Muslims.
All three agencies have denied the allegations of bias towards non-Muslims, explaining that the complexities involved in each investigation precluded the use of one to benchmark the level of action in another.
Labels:
Islam Discrimination,
Multimedia
Iraq’s Yazidis hide on mountain as ISIS advances
BAGHDAD: After fleeing from Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria militants, thousands of ethnic Yazidis stranded on a mountain were hoping that Iraqi government planes would drop food to…
BAGHDAD: After fleeing from Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria militants, thousands of ethnic Yazidis stranded on a mountain were hoping that Iraqi government planes would drop food to save them.
The supplies never came. All they could do was pray for help.
Just a week ago, Yazidis living in their ancient homeland of Sinjar in northern Iraq felt protected by Kurdish peshmerga forces. Followers of an ancient religion derived from Zoroastrianism, the Yazidis are themselves Kurds.
The peshmerga – “those who confront death” – had acquired reputations as fierce warriors who once took on Saddam Hussein’s troops. But they gave way before the Sunni militants, who had seized tanks and armored personnel carriers from the Iraqi military when they swept through the north in June.
Iraq’s U.S.-trained and funded army crumbled, leaving the Kurds and Shiite militias to fight back against Sunni militants, who were gaining momentum after launching a weekend offensive. ISIS said it has now captured Iraq’s biggest dam, a military base and 15 towns.
The Yazidis appear to be paying the heaviest humanitarian price for the ambitions of ISIS, which has declared a caliphate in parts of Iraq and Syria and has threatened to march on Baghdad.
“Most of the families were stopped by Islamic State militants while they were leaving and the militants killed men. Some were beheaded,” said Abu Ali, 38, who was hiding with tens of thousands of others on Sinjar Mountain.
“One of the saddest stories was one of our relatives. They beheaded all his 15 family members in front of him and then took him with them.”
Yazidi women were hauled away for forced marriages, or perhaps slavery, as in other towns. “Some were taken to Syria,” Abu Ali said.
Many of Yazidi villages were destroyed years earlier when Saddam Hussein’s troops tried to crush the Kurds. Some were abducted by his security agents. Now they are on the defensive again.
Witnesses reached by telephone said about 100 babies died from thirst in mountains infested by snakes and scorpions. But coming down from the mountains and returning to Sinjar is a risky option.
In other places they have captured, Islamic State militants have imposed their radical view of Islam – women must wear a full-face veil, Shiite mosques must be dynamited, “infidels” eliminated.
Minorities have little chance of surviving unless they conform.
Nareen Shammo, a Yazidi activist, said families who stayed behind in Sinjar were forced to convert to Islam. “Five hundred women were kidnapped. Some of them were sold in an auction at low prices and others were forced to marry militants,” Shammo said.
Amnesty International said panic was gripping northern Iraq.
“Many members of minorities are even fleeing areas where there seems to be no imminent danger of an ISIS attack as they are so traumatized by their recent displacement,” said Donatella Rovera, Amnesty International’s senior crisis response adviser, who is currently in northern Iraq.
Thousands of Iraqis, predominantly Yazidis, have fled to the Turkish border to escape ISIS fighters, local officials said.
Some of the thousands of people trapped by ISIS militants on Sinjar mountain have been rescued in the past 24 hours, a spokesman for the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said Thursday.
“We’re just receiving the information right now. We’ve just heard that people over the last 24 hours have been extracted and the U.N. is mobilizing resources to ensure that these people are assisted on arrival,” David Swanson said by phone from Iraq.
“This is a tragedy of immense proportions, impacting the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.”
Another Yazidi, who asked not to be identified, said he and his family spend their time under a tree to escape the punishing sun.
“We heard that there were planes which dropped some help, but we didn’t get anything,” he said.
Unable to return to Sinjar and fearful the rough mountain conditions could soon kill them, Yazidis were clinging to stories of heroics unrelated to realities on the ground.
“We heard that there is a person called Qasin Shasho who was in the mountainous areas, gathered his supporters and started to fight the Islamic State with the coordination of some young men. They forced the Islamic State to return back,” said the Yazidi who asked to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals.
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on August 08, 2014, on page 8.
Labels:
ISIS
Khalid’s claims of injustice absurd, laughable, says PKR vice-president - TMI
Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim’s claims of injustice have been described by a PKR lawmaker as absurd and laughable.Padang Serai MP N.Surendran (pic) said the charges against Khalid were…
Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim’s claims of injustice have been described by a PKR lawmaker as absurd and laughable.Padang Serai MP N.Surendran (pic) said the charges against Khalid were clearly stated in the show cause letter issued to him.
"Instead of replying to the charges against him, Khalid has decided to write lengthy letters to defy the PKR disciplinary board," Surendran said.
This morning, the embattled Selangor Menteri Bbesar made public a three-page reply in which he claimed that the PKR disciplinary board had rushed through the disciplinary proceedings against him.
"Khalid is claiming the action taken against him has been rushed and he has not been given sufficient time to respond to the charges," Surendran said.
"Yet, Khalid is able to find the time to promptly send long and combative replies to the party's disciplinary board.”
Surendran said the tone and manner of Khalid's replies indicated that the Selangor menteri besar had no intention of submitting to PKR's disciplinary process.
Surendran, who is PKR vice-president, said Khalid's attempts to portray himself as a victim of injustice were ridiculous and laughable.
"It is Khalid's actions which are injuring his own party and contributed to the present turmoil within Pakatan Rakyat," Surendran said.
"Khalid's refusal to accede to the party's wishes and resign from his position is indefensible. He should be subjected to disciplinary action," he added.
But instead of replying to the charges, Khalid chose to write lengthy letters to defy the board and party, questioning the disciplinary board's integrity, Surendran said.
Earlier today, Khalid claimed that state administration issues were beyond the purview of the PKR disciplinary board.
He posted on the Selangorku website a three-page reply addressed to PKR disciplinary board chairman Datuk Dr Tan Kee Kwong.
Khalid said in the show cause letter he had received from the party, he had been asked to give a detailed explanation on five issues.
The issues are the water restructuring deal in Selangor, the MB's new allowance, tax increase on business licences, the proposed Kidex expressway and the Bank Islam issue.
"The five additional issues which have been raised have been discussed by the state government committee which has the executive power to administer Selangor," Khalid said.
"The PKR disciplinary board only has the authority to decide on any transgressions related to the party and not state administrative issues," he said.
Khalid also said the show cause letter PKR had issued to him was "defective" as it lacked specifics for him to reply.
"When a notice is issued, it is a main consideration for the notice to clearly and specifically state the accusations against me by stating the relevant clauses as prescribed in the party's constitution, as well as clauses of punishments that could be taken against me.
"Such specifics have to be listed down but unfortunately the notice dated August 5 is defective without any relevant evidence for me to reply," he said.
Khalid, who is facing tremendous pressure from PKR to step down, also poured scorn on the engineered Kajang Move which he claimed, was unfair towards him.
Instead, he said the Kajang Move was a "directive" to him without giving him due consideration to his responsibilities as the menteri besar.
"I should be given the opportunity to answer charges which are specific instead of vague as stated in the show cause letter," Khalid said.
"Moreover, I find the actions of the party disciplinary board to be extremely suspicious," he added.
"It is also unreasonable for me to have to explain five additional issues given the short period of time that has been allocated."
Khalid accused the disciplinary board of going against Article 3 of the PKR Constitution which states "Justice for All".
"I am very concerned and worried at the hasty manner in which the disciplinary proceedings have been rushed through."
Khalid compared his situation with the sodomy conviction of PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, which had raised eyebrows.
"The speedy manner in which the Court of Appeal found Anwar guilty of sodomy charges has also caused a lot of concern," he said.
"Therefore, we cannot give the perception that PKR is also acting in the same manner as the appellate court," Khalid said.
Khalid also said he could not attend the party disciplinary hearing today due to his commitments as Selangor menteri besar, and proposed that the hearing be postponed to August 15 at 3pm.
Court: 'Zero tolerance' on custodial deaths - Malaysiakini
The Court of Appeal said today there
should be zero tolerance of custodial deaths and is recommending that
independent public inquiries be held on all such cases.
The appellate court…
The appellate court…
The Court of Appeal said today there
should be zero tolerance of custodial deaths and is recommending that
independent public inquiries be held on all such cases.
The appellate court said this when allowing the reduction in the quantum of damages, including waiving of a false imprisonment claim, in relation to the death of A Kugan in police custody five years ago.
With this, Kugan's family is awarded RM701,700 in exemplary damages including tort of public misfeasance (abuse of power).
The summary judgment of the decision was read out by Court of Appeal judge David Wong Dak Wah.
The other judges who were favourable to maintaining most of the damages were Justice Mohd Arif Mohd Yusof and Justice Mah Weng Kwai.
Justice Mohd Arif led the three-member bench.
Justice Wong, in describing this as a difficult case as the law had yet to be developed especially in cases of public misfeasance, said custodial deaths cannot and should not happen in this country.
“There should be zero tolerance to any custodial death in all remand centres in the country. And should custodial death happen, a public independent inquiry must be initiated commensurate with the right of the family of the deceased to know when there is some doubt as to the cause of death.”
Kugan's mother Indra Nallathamby, 44 (right),
named the then Selangor police chief Khalid Abu Bakar (now
inspector-general of police), police constable Navindran Vivekanandan,
the then Subang Jaya police chief Zainal Rashid Abu Bakar (now
deceased), as well as the then inspector-general of police and the
government as defendants.
No ombudsman system
Justice Wong noted that since the country does not have an ombudsman system, as recommended by the royal commission of inquiry, the court would have to take up the role.
An
ombudsman, as imposed in some parliamentary democracies, is a public
advocate with a significant degree of independence, who will be
responsible in looking at the interests of the public in investigating
mal-administration and violation of rights.
“In Malaysia, we do not have an ombudsman or an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) for police reform.
“In this case, the intention of Kugan’s family is clear and that is to hold the defendants responsible and accountable for their unlawful action as public officers.
“It is not just a case of merely being compensated, it is more and that is to ensure that the public officials who are supposed to be guardians of the constitution are brought to task and that such unlawful actions should not happen again.
“Remand prisoners are innocent until convicted in a court of law and are entitled to their basic human rights,” Justice Wong said in reading out the judgment.
Why false imprisonment claim was not allowed
In ruling out the claim for false imprisonment, Justice Wong said that while the judge at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur ruled that this was the case, the appellate court decided otherwise.
He said the remand of Kugan was the consequence of a judicial act, being an order given by a magistrate on Jan 15, 2009.
“Unless and until this remand is set aside by way of a criminal appeal or revision by the High Court, that remand remains lawful. It is undisputed that no such application to the High Court had been made by the plaintiff (Kugan's mother) to declare the remand order as unlawful.
“We are of the view that a separate suit, by way of criminal revision, should have been commenced and not through this civil suit. It is our respective view the abuses which the deceased endured do not and cannot give rise to a cause of action of false imprisonment.
“Accordingly, we find that the tort of false imprisonment is not available to the plaintiff as there is a valid remand,” the judgment states.
Hence, for this reason, the Court of Appeal did not allow the false imprisonment claim of RM100,000 that the High Court also awarded.
Constable Navindran's liability reduced
The court said there is merits to the appeal by Navindran, the police constable charged with injuring Kugan, as the trial judge also found there were other policemen involved in beating up Kugan.
Wong
said despite those findings, the trial judge (Justice VT Singham) did
not take this into consideration when determining the liability of
Navindran (right).
“This failure warrants us to allow the appeal in part only, in that we also find him responsible partly for the death of the deceased. The degree of responsibility, in our view, should be reduced to 45 percent and our reason is that the defendant is not alone in this tragedy.
“By the defendant's admission, other police officers, by virtue of their involvement, had been assigned to desk duties as a form of punishment,” he said.
In agreeing to give the tort of public misfeasance, the court ruled there were violations to Kugan's right in terms of right to liberty and equality before the law.
The full judgment will be out on Monday.
Indra was represented by R Sivarasa and L Bani Prakash, while senior federal counsel Azizan Md Arshad appeared for the police and government, while Ramesh Sivakumar appeared for Navindran.
The appellate court said this when allowing the reduction in the quantum of damages, including waiving of a false imprisonment claim, in relation to the death of A Kugan in police custody five years ago.
With this, Kugan's family is awarded RM701,700 in exemplary damages including tort of public misfeasance (abuse of power).The summary judgment of the decision was read out by Court of Appeal judge David Wong Dak Wah.
The other judges who were favourable to maintaining most of the damages were Justice Mohd Arif Mohd Yusof and Justice Mah Weng Kwai.
Justice Mohd Arif led the three-member bench.
Justice Wong, in describing this as a difficult case as the law had yet to be developed especially in cases of public misfeasance, said custodial deaths cannot and should not happen in this country.
“There should be zero tolerance to any custodial death in all remand centres in the country. And should custodial death happen, a public independent inquiry must be initiated commensurate with the right of the family of the deceased to know when there is some doubt as to the cause of death.”
Kugan's mother Indra Nallathamby, 44 (right),
named the then Selangor police chief Khalid Abu Bakar (now
inspector-general of police), police constable Navindran Vivekanandan,
the then Subang Jaya police chief Zainal Rashid Abu Bakar (now
deceased), as well as the then inspector-general of police and the
government as defendants.No ombudsman system
Justice Wong noted that since the country does not have an ombudsman system, as recommended by the royal commission of inquiry, the court would have to take up the role.
An
ombudsman, as imposed in some parliamentary democracies, is a public
advocate with a significant degree of independence, who will be
responsible in looking at the interests of the public in investigating
mal-administration and violation of rights.“In Malaysia, we do not have an ombudsman or an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) for police reform.
“In this case, the intention of Kugan’s family is clear and that is to hold the defendants responsible and accountable for their unlawful action as public officers.
“It is not just a case of merely being compensated, it is more and that is to ensure that the public officials who are supposed to be guardians of the constitution are brought to task and that such unlawful actions should not happen again.
“Remand prisoners are innocent until convicted in a court of law and are entitled to their basic human rights,” Justice Wong said in reading out the judgment.
Why false imprisonment claim was not allowed
In ruling out the claim for false imprisonment, Justice Wong said that while the judge at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur ruled that this was the case, the appellate court decided otherwise.
He said the remand of Kugan was the consequence of a judicial act, being an order given by a magistrate on Jan 15, 2009.
“Unless and until this remand is set aside by way of a criminal appeal or revision by the High Court, that remand remains lawful. It is undisputed that no such application to the High Court had been made by the plaintiff (Kugan's mother) to declare the remand order as unlawful.
“We are of the view that a separate suit, by way of criminal revision, should have been commenced and not through this civil suit. It is our respective view the abuses which the deceased endured do not and cannot give rise to a cause of action of false imprisonment.
“Accordingly, we find that the tort of false imprisonment is not available to the plaintiff as there is a valid remand,” the judgment states.
Hence, for this reason, the Court of Appeal did not allow the false imprisonment claim of RM100,000 that the High Court also awarded.
Constable Navindran's liability reduced
The court said there is merits to the appeal by Navindran, the police constable charged with injuring Kugan, as the trial judge also found there were other policemen involved in beating up Kugan.
Wong
said despite those findings, the trial judge (Justice VT Singham) did
not take this into consideration when determining the liability of
Navindran (right).“This failure warrants us to allow the appeal in part only, in that we also find him responsible partly for the death of the deceased. The degree of responsibility, in our view, should be reduced to 45 percent and our reason is that the defendant is not alone in this tragedy.
“By the defendant's admission, other police officers, by virtue of their involvement, had been assigned to desk duties as a form of punishment,” he said.
In agreeing to give the tort of public misfeasance, the court ruled there were violations to Kugan's right in terms of right to liberty and equality before the law.
The full judgment will be out on Monday.
Indra was represented by R Sivarasa and L Bani Prakash, while senior federal counsel Azizan Md Arshad appeared for the police and government, while Ramesh Sivakumar appeared for Navindran.
Labels:
killing Indians by police,
Kugan
Hands off massage parlours, sultan tells Jais - Malaysiakini
Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah
today told the Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais) to stop
focusing on raiding massage parlours.
In
his speech to the Jais staff today, Sultan Sharafuddin…
In
his speech to the Jais staff today, Sultan Sharafuddin…
Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah
today told the Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais) to stop
focusing on raiding massage parlours.
In
his speech to the Jais staff today, Sultan Sharafuddin said the
department should only take action within its job scope and not infringe
on the job scope of the local authorities.
"Taking action against massage parlours (rumah-rumah urut) is the responsibility of the local authorites," he said at the Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah building today.
He added that this was also important so as to avoid criticism of Jais for focusing on trivial matters.
'Emphasise apostasy instead'
He pointed out that Jais should instead give emphasis on issues of apostasy, deviations from the teachings and political speeches in mosques and suraus that he said can affect the sanctity of Islam.
Stressing further, the sultan said Jais, similarly, should emphasise the understanding of Sunni Islam since it is the "main core of belief of the Muslims in the country".
"The failure of Muslims to understand Sunni Islam will give way to deviant teachings," he said.
The sultan then urged both Majlis Agama Islam Selangor (Mais) and Jais to remain as "neutral institutions".
He had earlier commented on several politicians who had taken advantage in using issues related to Islam, by questioning the actions of Mais and Jais as part of their political agenda.
"I want Mais and Jais to avoid getting involved in any party's political agenda," he stressed.
In
his speech to the Jais staff today, Sultan Sharafuddin said the
department should only take action within its job scope and not infringe
on the job scope of the local authorities."Taking action against massage parlours (rumah-rumah urut) is the responsibility of the local authorites," he said at the Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah building today.
He added that this was also important so as to avoid criticism of Jais for focusing on trivial matters.
'Emphasise apostasy instead'
He pointed out that Jais should instead give emphasis on issues of apostasy, deviations from the teachings and political speeches in mosques and suraus that he said can affect the sanctity of Islam.
Stressing further, the sultan said Jais, similarly, should emphasise the understanding of Sunni Islam since it is the "main core of belief of the Muslims in the country".
"The failure of Muslims to understand Sunni Islam will give way to deviant teachings," he said.
The sultan then urged both Majlis Agama Islam Selangor (Mais) and Jais to remain as "neutral institutions".
He had earlier commented on several politicians who had taken advantage in using issues related to Islam, by questioning the actions of Mais and Jais as part of their political agenda.
"I want Mais and Jais to avoid getting involved in any party's political agenda," he stressed.
Labels:
Muslim Authority,
Selangor
Only three Gaza protesters outside KL McDonald's
Only three activists were seen protesting at two McDonald's outlets in Kuala Lumpur today amidst calls for a national boycott over the Israeli-Gaza conflict.
At…
Only three activists were seen protesting at two McDonald's outlets in Kuala Lumpur today amidst calls for a national boycott over the Israeli-Gaza conflict.
At the outlet in Bangsar, two activists there claimed "hundreds" of Gaza sympathisers were planning to stage a protest, but did not show up because of police presence.
“At
least two hundred protesters did not want to come too near to the
restaurant because of the five police who are guarding the scene,” said
one of the protesters Amrayy Ahman, who is a member of Jaringan Melayu
Malaysia (JMM).The duo put up five Israeli flags printed with "sila pijak bendera ini" (please step on this flag) and "pijak - [selfie] kaki - share di FB" on the floor as a form of protest.
Also present was JMM director Faizan Mohd Nor, who claimed to have organised the NGO's first protest in Terengganu before staging this second one.
"We
feel very angry, because they (McDonald's) have contributed to Israel,
so I urge all the residents in KL not to eat McD food, if possible."Many of our brothers in Palestine have been slaughtered, they (the Israelis) are one evil race. This (boycott) is the start of economic sanctions on them," Faizan said.
Asked if the boycott is going to affect the employees who are mostly Muslim Malaysians, Faizan opined that McDonald's is a giant company and therefore their workers will remain untouched.
Parking problems blamed
Explaining the low turnout of protester, he said it could be due to the traffic and lack of parking spaces around Bangsar's Jalan Telawi.
He also warned that there will be more protests to come in the near future.
In another McDonald's outlet near Masjid Jamek, Malaysiakini spotted a lone activist protesting this afternoon after Friday prayers.The activist, who only wished to be known as Saiful, said he is not affiliated to any party and has been going around protesting for the past week.
"I have been doing this protest alone for the past week, going to various outlets," he added.
Earlier today, Saiful had stormed into the McDonald's outlet in Masjid Jamek brandishing a Palestinian flag.
He told Malaysiakini that he intends to continue at other outlets like those in Kota Raya and Bukit Bintang.
Meant to 'educate'
Palestine sympathisers angry with recent bombings in Gaza have put the popular burger chain on the grill for allegedly chanelling funds to Israel.
The Israeli attacks that started on July 8 have left 1,886 Palestinians dead and countless others injured in a trail of destruction.
Saiful said he learned about the nationwide boycott online and wanted to enlighten fellow Malaysians on the current situation at Gaza by protesting.“It is everybody’s right if they want to eat (McDonald's products) or not. But they should be able to reason and decide not to support McDonald's which indirectly supports Israel.”
He also said he had no intention of harassing the outlets' staff or their operations but merely to make a stand and gather more support.
“I am doing this protest to educate Malaysians on the catastrophe at hand, at the same time invite them to join my noble cause,” added Saiful, who wore a bandana to cover his face.
Saiful also went around distributing leaflets to passers by calling to boycott other Israeli products and companies supporting Israel.
Among the brands spotted on the flyer were Coca Cola, IBM, Intel, Motorola and Nestle.
McD's staff the victims
Meanwhile, McDonald’s Malaysia in a statement today reiterated that the funding allegations were untrue and said they were sympathetic to Gaza's plight.
“We wish to state very clearly that McDonald’s Malaysia does not support nor condone the current conflict in the Middle East.
"Like all Malaysians, our utmost sympathies go out to the innocent victims in Gaza.”The fast food chain also made clear that they were not funding any of the forces in Israel and have fallen prey to misinformation.
“We wish to reiterate our stand that McDonald’s Malaysia does not channel any sales, profits or franchise fees from our restaurants to support any political causes or conflicts in any part of the world.”
“We have been consistent and transparent in communicating our position, but unfortunately the information that we share have been misinterpreted by certain parties.”
The conglomerate also lamented on the mistreatment of their employees and franchisees by fellow Malaysians due to the current conflict.
“Our employees who are practically all Malaysians have had to endure harassment, threats, and verbal abuse.
"Some of our restaurants have also been subjected to acts of vandalism. Our employees and franchisees have done nothing wrong, and it is grossly unfair that they should be targeted in such a way."
Cops tracing several Facebook account holders
Police are after several Facebook account holders who have posted seditious remarks on their pages.
KUALA LUMPUR: Police are tracing Facebook account holders responsible for posting seditious statements on their…
More ►
More ▼
Police are after several Facebook account holders who have posted seditious remarks on their pages.
KUALA LUMPUR: Police are tracing Facebook account holders responsible for posting seditious statements on their pages.
Among them are Facebook account holders using the names Vignamona VM, Kelvin Yip, Mohd Adam Asyiq bin Balasubramaniam and Persatuan Kongsi Gelap Melayu (Association of Malay Secret Societies). They are being sought by police to assist in their investigations.
Bukit Aman Criminal Investigation Department Director DCP Mohmad Salleh said action would be taken against them following numerous reports for posting seditious remarks, as well as statements containing elements of racism and religious insults.
“These irresponsible actions will affect the good relations among the people of various races in the country, if not curbed immediately,” he told reporters at Bukit Aman here today.
He advised the owners of the Facebook accounts concerned to surrender themselves to police to assist in the investigations.
▲
Among them are Facebook account holders using the names Vignamona VM, Kelvin Yip, Mohd Adam Asyiq bin Balasubramaniam and Persatuan Kongsi Gelap Melayu (Association of Malay Secret Societies). They are being sought by police to assist in their investigations.
Bukit Aman Criminal Investigation Department Director DCP Mohmad Salleh said action would be taken against them following numerous reports for posting seditious remarks, as well as statements containing elements of racism and religious insults.
“These irresponsible actions will affect the good relations among the people of various races in the country, if not curbed immediately,” he told reporters at Bukit Aman here today.
He advised the owners of the Facebook accounts concerned to surrender themselves to police to assist in the investigations.
Labels:
facebook
Stay out of politics, Sultan tells Jais and Mais
The Sultan of Selangor says Jais and Mais should uphold the sanctity of Islam and avoid being made the subject of political agendas.
In a message to staff of the…
More ►
More ▼
The Sultan of Selangor says Jais and Mais should uphold the sanctity of Islam and avoid being made the subject of political agendas.
In a message to staff of the Department of Islamic Affairs (Jais) today, the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah told department officials they should focus their efforts more on cases of “apostasy” rather then carrying out raids on massage parlours.
He said these raids were best left to the relevant authorities instead of Jais, who should instead focus on upholding and protecting the “core beliefs of the Muslims”, such as fostering the better understanding of Sunni Islam.
He cautioned the department that neglecting to do this would result in Muslims succumbing to “deviant teachings”.
He also said Jais should keep a close watch on political speeches in suraus and mosques, many of which affected the sanctity of Islam.
The Sultan said, “Jais should focus on more important cases that involved deviant teachings and apostasy as well as political speeches in mosques and suraus that threatened the sanctity of Islam, eroded the Muslim faith and caused unrest among Muslims.”
He stressed that he did not want to see the actions of the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais) and Jais exploited by opportunistic politicians, who would not think twice about trivialising the departments’ efforts and turning it into political issues.
Both Jais and Mais should instead strive to be “neutral institutions” so as to avoid being part of any party’s political agenda.
▲
He said these raids were best left to the relevant authorities instead of Jais, who should instead focus on upholding and protecting the “core beliefs of the Muslims”, such as fostering the better understanding of Sunni Islam.
He cautioned the department that neglecting to do this would result in Muslims succumbing to “deviant teachings”.
He also said Jais should keep a close watch on political speeches in suraus and mosques, many of which affected the sanctity of Islam.
The Sultan said, “Jais should focus on more important cases that involved deviant teachings and apostasy as well as political speeches in mosques and suraus that threatened the sanctity of Islam, eroded the Muslim faith and caused unrest among Muslims.”
He stressed that he did not want to see the actions of the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais) and Jais exploited by opportunistic politicians, who would not think twice about trivialising the departments’ efforts and turning it into political issues.
Both Jais and Mais should instead strive to be “neutral institutions” so as to avoid being part of any party’s political agenda.
Labels:
Selangor
Anwar: Pakatan not bound by PAS ulama decision
He says they may not be fully aware of issues regarding Khalid.
PETALING JAYA: PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim today played down the PAS Religious Council’s decision to back Selangor Menteri…
More ►
More ▼
He says they may not be fully aware of issues regarding Khalid.
PETALING JAYA: PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim today played down the PAS Religious Council’s decision to back Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, saying Pakatan Rakyat was not bound by it.
“We respect their view, but it will not bind Pakatan Rakyat in its decision,” he said.
He added that there could be issues that members of the Council were not aware that needed to be explained to them.
He also appealed to PKR members to be sensitive to Khalid’s feelings when commenting on the issue.
“I admit that sometimes some PKR members have made sensitive comments,” he said. “But I now ask them to exercise some control and to concentrate on facts alone.”
▲
“We respect their view, but it will not bind Pakatan Rakyat in its decision,” he said.
He added that there could be issues that members of the Council were not aware that needed to be explained to them.
He also appealed to PKR members to be sensitive to Khalid’s feelings when commenting on the issue.
“I admit that sometimes some PKR members have made sensitive comments,” he said. “But I now ask them to exercise some control and to concentrate on facts alone.”
Gameplan – Get rid of Khalid
It had been quite a while since we last spoke, and I knew that he had been quite…
It had been quite a while since we last spoke, and I knew that he had been quite involved in PKR.
He asked if we could meet.
I told him that I was quite pressed for time given my Negara-Ku and ABU work, and asked if there was anything urgent.
He replied that he was quite exasperated with this whole Khalid fiasco and the goings-on in PKR for some time.
He started to pour out his heart, but I stopped him.
“What do you want me to do with whatever you are going to tell me?”, I asked.
If you believe what I am about to tell you, you can write about it and put it up on your blog.”, he replied.
“I know you well enough to trust you. This is what I will do. You write up whatever you want to tell me in a way that will not require me to do too much editing. After I have read it, if I think people have a right to know what you have written to me, I will publish it on my blog.”, I told Sivaji.
I received Sivaji’s story in the mail today.
It bore the same title as this post, and it appears below, with the minimal of editing.
__________________________________
By Sivaji
Was there a plan to remove Khalid long before the Kajang move?
Going by the revelations going around now it seems so.
But Khalid, it seems, was never in the loop of those plans.
So was he given (rather set up) to get the MBs position knowing he will get the job done and set the stage for the others to take over later?
From what has happened in the PKR elections, it seems that there was a plan to get him.
Sources have indicated that it was the top man in PKR who encouraged Khalid to contest Azmin.
Was this an attempt to show Malaysians that democracy is well and good in PKR?
We will never know.
When it dawned upon the leadership that Khalid was very much popular among the party members, Saifuddin was suddenly pushed into the race.
Most party members know this was an attempt to break Khalid’s votes.
It is very much a well known whisper amongst party members that the top man himself not only got Saifuddin to submit his nomination but phone calls were made to Division Heads to ensure votes were delivered for Saifuddin in the party elections.
Even with that Khalid has put up a good show against Azmin.
Without Saifuddin, Khalid would have won the Deputy President’s post by now.
And the Kajang move would have been buried.
Together with this was the conduct of the PKR election process.
After having much criticized the Election Commission, the PKR election Committee was no better.
There were insufficient election personnel in all the Divisions.
Ballot papers were insufficient in places where voter turnouts were larger than expected.
But more serious was the lack of independent observers, re-lections conducted without any valid reasons, voting locations in re-elections shifted to favour a particular candidate.
In Sungai Siput the incumbent Chairman and Committee were the counting agent. Ballot papers were marked by themselves. I saw this personally, gangsters from a particular camp were downstairs, so I could not do much.
In Pahang, Indian members were not encouraged to take part in the elections.
Why?
Many Indians favour Khalid. Just the funds given to temples and Tamil schools were good enough for the Indians to have Khalid as the party deputy president.
In Sabah, where there was large voter turnout favoring Khalid, the elections were disrupted and called off.
More frightening was what took place in Selangor.
Where Indians won the Ketua Cabang, elections were called off or some reason was given to call for re-election of completed elections.
At one time the results showed that 12 of the 22 Ketua Cabang had been won by Indian members. Where the winning candidate was known to favour Saifuddin or Azmin, there was no re-election.
Kuala Selangor was another issue together. They had to shame Khalid. They did that eventually
In Sepang, the Ketua Cabang was won by an Indian member. Haji Borhan, a close ally of Azmin, lost. Re-elections were called and the voting centre shifted to a place far from the first centre. The Indian candidate lost and Haji Borhan won the re-election.
In Puchong, in the first round, Khalid got the highest votes (861 against 22 for Azmin and 20 for Saifuddin). Re-elections have been called this Sunday.
What will happen?
We will never be able to tell. There will be no voting agents seated in the hall to object, only observors. This is the SOP for re-elections in PKR.
In Kuala Selangor, the elections were held again on June 22nd and the ballot boxes taken to Party headquarters. The counting took place on the 26th at 9pm.
The SOP for counting is either the votes for Ketua Cabang or the Timbalan President would be counted first or second vice versa.
The counting here started for Timbalan President and Khalid got 517 votes as against 440 for Azmin. Trends showed that if you win the Timbalan President votes, the Ketua Cabang aligned to the Timbalan President candidate will also win. Within 5 minutes there was a blackout. Later investigations showed there was a blackout indeed, but I still have my doubts from what I heard from the TNB.
The lights came on. The counting agents were told that the Ketua Cabang votes will be counted later. Protests were made but no effect. The votes for Pusat Wanita were counted. Meanwhile the vote trays for Ketua Cabang was hidden from view. One slight move by persons blocking the view showed a counting clerk holding a pencil. No action taken.
Votes were counted for Ketua Cabang and Khalid lost to Mike. 515 against 701.
There 370 empty ballot papers for Timbalan President post but there was only 120 empty ballot papers for Ketua Cabang. Those who did not know to vote for the Timbalan President suddenly knew how to vote for the Ketua Cabang.
Complaints were submitted but no action taken on this.
The complaints have since gone to the ROS
Is there an attempt to get Khalid out this way?
All this failing, the present move by the PKR leadership is very much questionable as to the real reasons.
Is there an attempt to keep Azmin safe so that when all settles down he would become the MB replacing Wan Azizah?
Azmin is very quiet.
Was this the game plan all along to go for the State coffers eventually?
Labels:
Haris Ibrahim
Why are the Hindus so upset?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Okay, I know why the Hindus are upset. They are upset because of that Indian-Muslim preacher, Ustaz Shahul Hamid Seeni Mohd, who mocked Hinduism. And it seems a second video has now emerged on Youtube. But my question is: why are the Hindus upset?
The reason I ask this question is because this is the normal modus operandi of those of the Abrahamic faiths. Watch or listen to the talks and sermons of the world-renowned Muslim and Christian preachers and tell me what you see and hear. What you will see and hear would be hate-messages against the other faiths.
I personally know some of the Muslim preachers, have met a few of them, and a couple have even come to my house back when I was in Malaysia. However, I do not want to mention their names but you know who all these people are. Their speeches and sermons are full of hate.
You may think this is confined to just the Muslim preachers but this is not so. Even the more fiery Christian preachers are the same — maybe not in Malaysia, for obvious reasons, but for sure in countries like the United States, especially Middle America where they even whack Catholics and call them non-Christians.
Do you know there are some Americans who do not understand Catholicism and do not regard Catholics as Christians? They belong to individual churches and those not of their church, even if the other churches are non-Catholic Christian churches, are seen as deviant Christians.
They promote their religion, or their branch of their religion, by mocking and condemning those not of their religion or not of their branch or ‘church’, Muslim preachers included, of course. So what Ustaz Shahul did can be considered as normal and no Muslim would feel that this is wrong, just like the Christian audience would not get upset when their preachers do the same.
Unfortunately, the more than 1,000-year rivalry of the three branches of the Abrahamic faiths, plus the various sub-branches and sub-sub branches, has been reduced to condemning and mocking ‘the other side’. It is about you must hate those who are not with us.
You may not have noticed but this is how politics is played as well, not only in Malaysia but also all over the world. Why do you think there is so much killing in so many countries (worse, of course, in Muslim countries but not confined to just Muslim countries)? All the conflicts are about hate.
There does not appear to be any love left in this world. People no longer talk about what they love. They talk about what they hate. Love does not drive you. Hate does. You do things motivated by hate rather than by love.
Why do Malaysians want a change of government? Well, because we hate Barisan Nasional. We hate Umno. We hate the Malay government. We hate the New Economic Policy. We hate what we see as discrimination against the non-Malays. We hate Najib Tun Razak and his wife. And the list goes on and on.
Why does PKR want Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim ousted? Again, because we hate him for not doing things the way we want him to and for not listening to us and for not being a ‘team player’? Is that a crime? Well, it is if I hate it.
Malays are very politicised creatures. Even MCA President Ling Liong Sik personally told me so 30 years ago back in the 1980s. And this, said Ling, is why the Chinese lose out to the Malays when it comes to politics.
But that was 30 years ago. Today, since the last decade or so, the Chinese (and Indians as well) have learned how to also become political creatures and the 2008 general election is proof of that. Today, the Chinese and Indians are as good (or as bad) as the Malays when it comes to politics, a far cry from the pre-2004 era.
The problem is the Chinese and Indians, too, have been contaminated by the Malay political culture. And this political culture is the culture of hate (just like how their religious culture is, culture of hate anything not Islam).
Many do not agree with what I write. And that is quite normal and to be expected. But none of those who do not like what I write rebut what I say or respond to what I write point-by-point. Instead, they post hate comments as their response.
My articles can run into two or three pages or 2,000 words or more. That is a lot of pages and words. Why don’t they reply based on their own research? Why condemn the writer rather than counter what the writer writes with your own analysis or assessment of the situation?
Opinions are just that, opinions. I have my opinion and you have yours. You can disagree with my opinion but then offer us your opinion. To disagree with my opinion by calling me names, like most people do, is not considered debating.
That is what Malaysians have been reduced to. When you disagree you condemn and you mock. And that is how Muslim plus Christian preachers try to convince their audience that they are right and are telling you God’s truth. They condemn and mock the rival belief.
So Hindus should not get upset. This is how Muslim and Christian preachers market their religion. They condemn and mock the other religions. And this, too, is how politics is played in Malaysia. They condemn and mock their political rivals. And in some countries, when the condemning and mocking reaches a certain level, they take up arms and kill each other, most times killing innocent civilians and non-combatants who are not even involved in the war.
The Chinese and Indians are no better than the Malays. Everyone does it. Everyone propagates hate whether it is about religion or politics. And for countries like Malaysia where religion and politics come as a package it really does not matter. Condemning one is seen as condemning the other. And this is why Malaysia is very complicated although Malaysia is not the only country like this.
Sometimes we no longer even know whether all those killings in some countries are about politics or religion. The line between the two is not clear. One thing that is clear though: never mind whether it is about politics or religion, it is certainly about hate.
Do you really think that propagating your religious or political cause through the message of hate is not going to have any serious repercussions in the end? I will be 64 years old next month and in 1969 I was 19. So I was old enough to know what happened in 1969. And let me assure you of one thing. The hate in Malaysia today is far worse than it was in 1969.
What is a leader without his followers or supporters?
How does one become the head of a government? And when one does, does one forget the people who supported you and voted you into public office?Tan Sri Abdul…
How does one become the head of a government? And when one does, does one forget the people who supported you and voted you into public office?Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim (pic), the beleaguered incumbent Selangor Menteri Besar, believes that state government matters are separate from the party and he does not need to explain his actions to the party or rather, he is beyond the party's scrutiny.
So, who is he answerable to? To the state ruler? To the people who elected him directly in Port Klang or to the people who voted for his Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition or to those who had confidence in him as menteri besar?
When he was the prime minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had always stressed that he was only in that office because he was the Umno president. He owed his position as PM to his his party and that was why he had to take cognisance of the party's views in running the country.
Obviously, Khalid does not think the same way.
In a three-page reply addressed to the PKR disciplinary board chairman Datuk Dr Tan Kee Kwong, which was posted on the Selangorku website, Khalid said the board's show cause letter had asked him to give detailed explanations on five issues.
They include the water restructuring deal in Selangor, MB's new allowance, tax increase on business licenses, the proposed Kidex expressway and the Bank Islam out-of-court settlement issue.
"The five additional issues which have been raised were discussed by the state government committee which has the executive power to administer Selangor.
"The PKR disciplinary board only has the authority to decide on any transgressions related to the party and not state administrative issues," Khalid said in his reply, which his political secretary submitted to the party this morning.
This is where Khalid is wrong.
He is answerable to his party because he is the MB by virtue of the support and confidence of his party. The party leadership now has no confidence in him, hence the crisis enveloping the state government.
As a public official, he is also answerable to the voters and that is why he has to make public the out-of-court settlement with Bank Islam. If he had lost the case, Khalid could be a bankrupt and lose his Port Klang state seat and be out of the Selangor Menteri Besar's job in a flash.
He obviously does not view the situation that way. What would his options be if PKR goes ahead and sacks him? What would his options be if his executive councillors resign?
And, who put him where he is today? At the very least, he should listen to those who put him in public office, supported his job, and end this sorry spectacle of a leader ignoring his own people.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/what-is-a-leader-without-his-followers-or-supporters#sthash.oSrUOOzd.dpuf
Labels:
Selangor
Najib must personally speak up and explain why he had reneged on two specific promises of “no toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL” and whether future Prime Ministerial pledges are any more credible and believable!
By Lim Kit Siang
The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Abdul Wahid Omar, failed big time in Johor Bahru on Tuesday when he tried to explain the…
More ►
More ▼
The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Abdul Wahid Omar, failed big time in Johor Bahru on Tuesday when he tried to explain the…
By Lim Kit Siang
The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Abdul Wahid Omar, failed big time in Johor Bahru on Tuesday when he tried to explain the rationale for the astronomical, unconscionable and unjust 480% causeway toll hike at the Johor causeway from August 1.
All he could say was that the decision to increase the Johor causeway toll at the Customs, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) Complex at the Sultan Iskandar Building in JB was made after a two-year study following the government’s decision not to impose toll at the Eastern Dispersal Link (EDL).
Wahid said toll collection at the EDL by its concessionaire, Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB) was supposed to have started in 2012, and the government is paying the concessionaire RM11 million a month in compensation.
After a two-year study, it was decided that there was no requirement for the government to take over the EDL.
Wahid has not given any rationale or reason whatsoever to justify the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak breaking two public and solemn pledges to the people of Johor Bahru in 2012, viz “No toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL”!
What is the new discovery from the government’s two-year study which Najib and the authorities had not known about when the Prime Minister made the two pledges of “No toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL” in March and September 2012 respectively as to justify the reneging of these two solemn EDL pledges by Najib?
If there is nothing new in the two-year study which the government had not known or no good reason why it should not have known before the two EDL pledges were made by Najib, what then is the reason for the reneging of these two EDL pledges apart from the factors of sheer bad faith, insincerity, dishonesty and rank irresponsibility?
Will Najib admit that he was guilty of bad faith, insincerity, dishonesty and/or rank irresponsibility when he made the two EDL pledges in 2012 of “no toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL” – as Najib never meant to honour the two EDL pledges when he made them in 2012?
Wahib also failed abjectly to give any rationale for the astronomic, unconscionable and unjust causeway toll hike of 480%, the indecent haste for the imposition for the toll hikes in less than a week of their announcement and why there was no proper public consultation or feedback before the astronomical and unconscionable toll hike were imposed.
It is clear that only Najib can address these questions about the violation of the two Prime Ministerial pledges on the EDL in 2012, and Najib should not tarry any further but make a special trip to Johor Bahru to personally speak up and explain why he had reneged on his two specific promises of “No toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL”, and most important of all, whether any of his future Prime Ministerial pledges are credible and believable!
▲
The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Abdul Wahid Omar, failed big time in Johor Bahru on Tuesday when he tried to explain the rationale for the astronomical, unconscionable and unjust 480% causeway toll hike at the Johor causeway from August 1.
All he could say was that the decision to increase the Johor causeway toll at the Customs, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) Complex at the Sultan Iskandar Building in JB was made after a two-year study following the government’s decision not to impose toll at the Eastern Dispersal Link (EDL).
Wahid said toll collection at the EDL by its concessionaire, Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB) was supposed to have started in 2012, and the government is paying the concessionaire RM11 million a month in compensation.
After a two-year study, it was decided that there was no requirement for the government to take over the EDL.
Wahid has not given any rationale or reason whatsoever to justify the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak breaking two public and solemn pledges to the people of Johor Bahru in 2012, viz “No toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL”!
What is the new discovery from the government’s two-year study which Najib and the authorities had not known about when the Prime Minister made the two pledges of “No toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL” in March and September 2012 respectively as to justify the reneging of these two solemn EDL pledges by Najib?
If there is nothing new in the two-year study which the government had not known or no good reason why it should not have known before the two EDL pledges were made by Najib, what then is the reason for the reneging of these two EDL pledges apart from the factors of sheer bad faith, insincerity, dishonesty and rank irresponsibility?
Will Najib admit that he was guilty of bad faith, insincerity, dishonesty and/or rank irresponsibility when he made the two EDL pledges in 2012 of “no toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL” – as Najib never meant to honour the two EDL pledges when he made them in 2012?
Wahib also failed abjectly to give any rationale for the astronomic, unconscionable and unjust causeway toll hike of 480%, the indecent haste for the imposition for the toll hikes in less than a week of their announcement and why there was no proper public consultation or feedback before the astronomical and unconscionable toll hike were imposed.
It is clear that only Najib can address these questions about the violation of the two Prime Ministerial pledges on the EDL in 2012, and Najib should not tarry any further but make a special trip to Johor Bahru to personally speak up and explain why he had reneged on his two specific promises of “No toll charges for non-users of EDL” and “No toll for EDL”, and most important of all, whether any of his future Prime Ministerial pledges are credible and believable!
Labels:
DAP
Legal experts have differing views on his status as Selangor MB
PETALING JAYA: Will Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim still be Mentri Besar if he is sacked by PKR?
That’s a question that’s begging to be answered by even legal experts who…
PETALING JAYA: Will Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim still be Mentri Besar if he is sacked by PKR?
That’s a question that’s begging to be answered by even legal experts who have differing views.
International
Islamic University law lecturer Assoc Prof Dr Shamrahayu A. Aziz
believes Khalid’s position will not be affected but two others,
Universiti Malaya’s Prof Gurdial Singh Nijar and Dr Abdul Aziz Bari,
think Khalid must resign.
Dr
Shamrahayu said Khalid would still be Mentri Besar as the sacking from
PKR does not directly affect his position as a member of the state
assembly.
“In order to become an MB, a person only needs to be a member of the state assembly and must command the assembly’s confidence.
“If
PKR sacks Khalid, he will not automatically be disqualified from the MB
post as long as he still commands majority support of the assembly,”
she said.
She
also noted that Khalid had the option to request for a dissolution of
the state assembly from the Sultan of Selangor if he is faced with
expulsion from the party.
Gurdial
and Dr Abdul Aziz think otherwise, stressing that Khalid cannot remain
as the Selangor Mentri Besar if he is booted out from PKR.
Gurdial
said if that happens, Khalid must resign as the post of mentri besar
can only be filled by a person from the party that commands majority
support of the state legislative assembly.
“If
he no longer has the confidence of the majority, he must resign. He can
ask for a dissolution of the state legislative assembly, but according
to convention, this is not an option if the coalition in control still
has majority and can continue to rule,” he said.
Gurdial
said the loss of confidence against the Mentri Besar can either be
expressed through a vote of no confidence in the state assembly or by
other means including a letter signed by all of the assemblymen, orally
or via any other communication.
“The
most important thing is that the Sultan must be satisfied that the
majority no longer support the incumbent mentri besar,” he said.
Dr Abdul Aziz said that if PKR sacked Khalid, it was a sign that it had withdrawn support for him.
“If
PKR decides to disown him, he has no other choice but to resign. That
indicates he has lost part of his support from the state assembly,” he
said.
On Sunday, Khalid insisted that the majority of the state assembly still had confidence in him so he will not resign.
Later,
he received a show-cause letter by the PKR disciplinary committee on
Tuesday to explain why he had defied orders from the party leadership to
step down.
Labels:
Selangor
Najib: Government To Come Up With Restructuring Plan For MAS By end-August
KUALA
LUMPUR, Aug 8 (Bernama) -- The government and Khazanah Nasional Bhd
are in the final stages of completing a holistic restructuring plan for
Malaysian Airline System Bhd (MAS) and…KUALA
LUMPUR, Aug 8 (Bernama) -- The government and Khazanah Nasional Bhd
are in the final stages of completing a holistic restructuring plan for
Malaysian Airline System Bhd (MAS) and a detailed plan will be announced
by end-August, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.The government, through its strategic investment fund, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, today announced a formal process to take full ownership and de-list the airline from Bursa Malaysia.
"This is the first step needed to return our national carrier to profitability. It is a step I wholeheartedly support.
"MAS is part of Malaysia's history. It is a symbol of national pride, of our ambitions and our place in the world. So today we are making changes to ensure it is also part of Malaysia's future story," he said in a statement here Friday, in response to the proposed de-listing of MAS.
He believed that the national carrier must be renewed to create a genuinely strong and sustainable national carrier.
"This process of renewal will involve painful steps and sacrifices from all parties.
"My instruction and my commitment to all concerned is that the process will be carried out professionally, with proper principles of fairness, transparency and compassion," he said.
Najib also touched on the recent losses of MH370 and MH17, saying that seldom before has a company been subjected to two profound and extraordinary tragedies in such a short space of time.
He hoped that these twin tragedies would change the way the aviation industry operates, making global travel safer for all.
Kaji penutupan Facebook
Menteri Komunikasi dan Multimedia, Datuk Seri Ahmad Shabery Cheek…
Menteri Komunikasi dan Multimedia, Datuk Seri Ahmad Shabery Cheek berkata, kajian tersebut akan dilaksanakan dalam bentuk pungutan suara terhadap pelbagai lapisan peringkat masyarakat di negara ini.
“Saya nak dengar pandangan orang ramai kerana antara aduan paling besar kita terima adalah melalui Facebook. Sekiranya orang ramai berpendapat bahawa laman web itu perlu ditutup, kita bersedia untuk melihatnya.
“Kita melihat ia sebagai satu pendekatan yang radikal tetapi untuk menyekat Facebook itu (ketika ini adalah) tidak mungkin. Kita boleh mengadu kepada Facebook untuk menutup laman tertentu," katanya pada Majlis Penutup Mesyuarat Perwakilan Pergerakan Wanita UMNO Bahagian Cheras di sini hari ini.
Beliau mengulas beberapa kes penghinaan dilakukan penggunaan Facebook terhadap isu-isu sensitif rakyat negara ini termasuk melibatkan kaum dan agama.
Yang turut hadir, Setiausaha Badan Perhubungan UMNO Wilayah Persekutuan, Datuk Seri Syed Ali Al-Habshee.
Seramai 174 perwakilan Wanita UMNO dari bahagian tersebut hadir pada mesyuarat berkenaan.
Mengulas lanjut, Ahmad Shabery berkata, pungutan suara tersebut akan dilaksanakan bagi mengetahui kesan yang bakal diterima pengguna laman sosial berkenaan sekiranya ia ditutup.
“Tetapi apakah ini pilihan yang kita pilih? Perkara ini perlu kita kaji dan perlu mendapat pandangan orang ramai sebab kita mempunyai lebih kurang 15 juta akaun Facebook di negara kita," katanya.
Jelas beliau, Facebook turut menjadi platform bagi rakyat negara ini menjalankan perniagaan mereka di samping merapatkan hubungan silaturahim di dalam institusi kekeluargaan.
Katanya, pandangan orang ramai juga perlu memandangkan hanya 2,000 aduan diterima membabitkan Facebook berbanding jumlah akaun keseluruhannya iaitu kira-kira 15 juta.
“Jadi, apakah kerana 2,000 kita terpaksa menutup kesemuanya? Jadi kena tengok balik dalam soal ini," katanya. - UTUSAN ONLINE
Artikel Penuh: http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/Dalam_Negeri/20140809/dn_02/Kaji-penutupan-Facebook#ixzz39pOoDPf8
© Utusan Melayu (M) Bhd
Labels:
facebook
Man who killed maids beheaded in Saudi Arabia
Riyadh, Aug 8 (IANS) A man in Saudi Arabia has been beheaded on the court's orders for sexually assaulting and murdering two Asian housemaids in a sea port, a media…
More ►
More ▼
Riyadh, Aug 8 (IANS) A man in Saudi Arabia has been beheaded on the court's orders for sexually assaulting and murdering two Asian housemaids in a sea port, a media report said here Friday.
Awdah Salem, a Yemen national, was also found guilty of pouring acid onto the body of one of the victims and hiding the remains of both women at different locations. He was beheaded Thursday, Arab News reported.
He confessed to having persuaded one of the two maids to run away with him during Ramadan after which he killed her and threw the body into an abandoned well in Yanbu sea port in 2007.
A year later Salem lured another maid to elope with him to a deserted place. After having sex with her, he hit her on the head with a rock and buried the body on a beach in the Yanbu in 2008.
Police managed to track down the killer following months of investigation.
A statement issued by the Saudi interior ministry confirmed Thursday that the general court issued the verdict based on the extensive charges, described as "evil, gruesome, and inhumane".
"The court sentenced him to death as a deterrent for others and higher authorities have endorsed execution of the sentence, while the appeal court and the supreme court had earlier endorsed the punishment."
▲
Awdah Salem, a Yemen national, was also found guilty of pouring acid onto the body of one of the victims and hiding the remains of both women at different locations. He was beheaded Thursday, Arab News reported.
He confessed to having persuaded one of the two maids to run away with him during Ramadan after which he killed her and threw the body into an abandoned well in Yanbu sea port in 2007.
A year later Salem lured another maid to elope with him to a deserted place. After having sex with her, he hit her on the head with a rock and buried the body on a beach in the Yanbu in 2008.
Police managed to track down the killer following months of investigation.
A statement issued by the Saudi interior ministry confirmed Thursday that the general court issued the verdict based on the extensive charges, described as "evil, gruesome, and inhumane".
"The court sentenced him to death as a deterrent for others and higher authorities have endorsed execution of the sentence, while the appeal court and the supreme court had earlier endorsed the punishment."
Labels:
Middle East
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)