The 13th general election has elements fitting the hypothesis that
Pakatan Rakyat, or PKR in particular, is a foreign stooge working to
change the regime for the benefit of the United States of America.
However, whether PKR is indeed on the US payroll to do its bidding can only be confirmed by the party itself.
This is the argument put forth by blogger Ruhanie Ahmad (
left) at a forum in Universiti Malaya today that discussed the way forward for the BN and Pakatan after GE13.
According
to Ruhanie, who authors the socio-political blog Kuda Kepang,
geo-political readings would make US interference not entirely
surprising.
He told a packed lecture hall at the main campus in
Petaling Jaya that this was because the US has been sore with Malaysia
for blocking its control of the Malacca Straits.
"If they can control (the Malacca Straits), they can transport energy from the Middle East to East Asia.
"Control
of sources of energy and transportation routes will make the US the
ultimate superpower," said Ruhanie, who is a doctorate candidate in
geo-politics and security studies.
Malaysia's prime ministers
from Dr Mahathir Mohamad to Najib Abdul Razak have been clear that no
global superpower will have a stake in the maintenance of the straits.
This
makes Malaysia the last elusive jigsaw piece in the US bid to control
the Southeast Asia maritime channels, after successfully forging
agreements with the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia.
"I see
the 13th general election as the climax to an attempt by a superpower to
put its proxy against the ruling government. That is my initial
assumption. Is it true?" asked the former BN backbencher.
Ruhanie
said question marks over foreign influence also extended to NGOs such
as electoral reform group Bersih, which has admitted to receiving
funding from US sources.
He said that this argument was also put forward by "authentic" sources like socio-political portal
Global Research writer Tony Cartalucci, who said that Wall Street was disappointed that its "proxy" lost in the Malaysian election.
"For
the BN, this exection exposes two security problems - national security
and societal security - and this must be corrected by the BN as a
government's role is to safeguard security."
Hypothesis failed peer review?However,
Ruhanie's views were challenged by members of the audience, made up
largely of post-graduate students and doctorate candidates.
One
doctorate candidate from Akademi Tentera Malaysia Universiti Teknologi
Malaysia (ATMA-UTM) - who stood up during the question-and-answer
session - even went as far as saying that if he were Ruhanie's
supervisor, he would not give the former MP a passing mark.
"As a doctorate candidate, what framework did you use to come to that conclusion?
"The
Global Research
writer Cartalucci had also written that the Lahad Datu intruders were
part of the Free Syria army, which is absolutely absurd," the UTM
student said.
To this, Ruhanie replied that he did not make a conclusion, but merely raised a hypothesis for further study.
"My
hypothesis is based on the new classical realm... that everything that
happens in a country is a causal effect of something else that happens
outside the country," he said.
Another postgraduate student also
asked how was it that supporters of Bersih and Pakatan have to often
fork out their own expenses to attend events if the two groups were so
flushed with cash.
However, the former Parit Sulong MP did not respond to this.
To
another question, Ruhanie admitted that he had been very supportive of
Bersih in 2007, but "the objectives and perceptions were different
then".
"The first Bersih is not the same as the second and third
Bersih (rallies)," he said, admitting that he was also very critical of
the Abdullah administration, but that he was okay with the Najib
administration.
Also on the panel were Merdeka Centre director Ibrahim Suffian and Keevan Sivarajah (
left), who coordinated the Institute of Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas) election observation mission.
In response to Ruhanie, both started their presentations by admitting that they are foreign funded.
Ibrahim
said he received US$60,000 in foreign grants, while Keevan said the
entire election observation mission was funded by foreign missions and
most controversially, by the George Soros-funded Open Society Institute.
"We
wrote to the Pakatan and BN governments, as well as the Prime
Minister's Department for funding, but no one wrote back," Ibrahim said.
Although
not taking Ruhanie head on, Ibrahim said one needed to truly question
if funding of US$60,000 for Merdeka Centre and US$20,000 for Bersih was
as big a security threat as the thousands of foreigners flooding Sabah,
as was revealed to the royal commission of inquiry on illegal
immigrants.