R Mohana Rani is powering ahead to secure the release of her husband and five others detained under the EO.
EXCLUSIVE
The
text message that R Mohana Rani received on the night of June 24 read
like a tired storyline. Police had intercepted and detained a busload of
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) activists travelling from Sungai Petani
to Penang.
On board were her husband and Sungai Siput MP, Dr Michael Jeyakumar
Devaraj, and their 18-year-old son, Raveen Veerasenan. But Rani – as she
prefers to be called – barely raised an eyebrow.
For the co-founder and deputy secretary-general of PSM, years of
enduring the customary police harassment that accompanies activism had
whittled down her fears and trained her to wait out these storms that
would predictably pass within a day.
“I was running a three-day leadership programme in Kuala Lumpur at
the time which I didn’t bother cancelling,” Rani, 56, recounted. “I’m
quite used to police arrests by now so I wasn’t worried. I even slept
soundly that night!”
But when she awoke at 4am the familiar plot had taken on an ominous
twist. A new text message from Jeyakumar’s personal assistant read that
police had discovered communist-related material in the bus.
The group would be remanded for seven days under charges of waging
war against the King. It was then that Rani felt the first flicker of
concern.
“It had become something else all together,” she said. “It was the
charge that shook us. No doubt it was outlandish but when the government
uses a charge like that you know that they are up to something.”
Rani cancelled the programme and made arrangements to return to Ipoh.
But she had one last duty to fulfil before making her way to her
family.
The detainees had been heading to Penang to promote PSM’s “Udahlah
tu… Bersaralah BN” (Enough already – retire now BN) campaign over the
weekend. The show had to go on.
“Things shouldn’t come to standstill just because of the arrests,”
Rani said. “So we attended the Sungai Siput programme where we addressed
a very good turnout.”
Yet none of the PSM speakers on that day could ignore the invisible
cloud of anxiety that hovered overhead. Rani’s thoughts turned
constantly to her only child.
When the seven-day remand period ended on July 2, PSM members
assembled at all the holding stations and Rani stationed herself at the
Butterworth Sessions Court.
Spirits lifted as Raveen, another teenager and a 55-year-old woman were soon released. But then the bombshell dropped.
The 21 detainees had their remand period extended for another three
days and the remaining six, including Jeyakumar, were re-arrested under
the Emergency Ordinance (EO) 1969.
“We were very disappointed at the extension of the remand period,” Rani said. “But it was the EO that came as a huge shock.”
Since the arrests Rani has been granted access to her husband three times for 15 minutes at a time.
The past two weeks have been hard on her but the steely calmness of her voice betrays no sign of it.
As an activist she is more comfortable paying attention to others
than drawing it to herself, and this was evident in her startled pause
when asked how she was holding up.
“I’m all right,” she assured. “It’s a hectic time but I’m not the
only one going through it. Many people are working around the clock to
pressure the government into securing their release.”
She paused again, then admitted: “It’s been a difficult time. And not
just emotionally. Each member of a family has a certain role and when
one member isn’t around another has to step up. But I’ve had tremendous
support from family and friends so I’m OK.”
Of anger, frustration and hope
Now a hint of frustration crept into her voice as she described the
entire incident as “senseless” and “a waste of time” that could be spent
on tackling more worthy issues.
“We’ve had to work harder than usual every single day since the
government and police have put up a wall where information is
concerned,” she said. “They have kept us completely in the dark. And the
police have treated us very badly.”
“This whole thing is something laughable that unfortunately can’t be
laughed off. And what infuriates me is how the government is using its
might to subdue the people while saying that the people’s voice
matters.”
But
Rani, a former secondary school English teacher, isn’t fuelled by anger
and frustration alone. She also has a firm grip on hope.
A hope that never led her to question the worthiness of her chosen
path. And a hope that further intensified when the Bersih 2.0 rally took
place against all odds.
“There is a great public resistance today,” she noted. “If you look
back at all the Internal Security Act (ISA) arrests, you’ll see that the
climate of fear was greater then than it is now. People are now
prepared to confront and challenge the government.”
“What makes it worthwhile at the end of the day is that people are
seeing the system for what it is and the people in power for who they
are. Their true colours are being revealed and everyone can see the
faces behind the masks.”
The veteran activist
Rani is a fusion of fire and ice. The same voice that ignites with
passion when speaking of injustices can just as easily slip into cool
detachment when touching on personal emotions. The latter is attributed
to her being an activism veteran.
“If I had never been exposed to such situations before I would
probably be having a different experience now,” she stated. “But we’ve
been in the game long enough to know that the government can use
draconian laws against the people.”
“We’re under no illusions and that makes us tougher. We’re not
sitting in a corner mourning or moping. Neither are the six. Their
spirits are very strong although Kumar is still physically weak.”
Rani confessed, however, to fearing for her husband’s life when he
was admitted to the National Heart Institute (IJN) for heart
palpitations.
“The heart is not a very hardy organ and you never know how serious a
heart ailment is,” she said. “But I also fear for the other five
because they’re being submitted to the mental torture of having to
answer the same questions over and over again.”
“There is nothing more that the police can extract from them. We’ve
done everything in the open. The police are holding them for political
reasons; it has nothing to do with national security.”
Communism and the younger generation
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Nazri Aziz, however, would
disagree. Two days ago, he insisted that the EO was necessary because
communism was still alive in the country as proven by PSM. Rani
vehemently shot down this reasoning.
“For a political detainee there can be no crime worse than waging war
against the King,” she pointed out. “Yet the six were released unconditionally
after the remand period. A re-arrest should therefore be for a lesser
crime and it certainly shouldn’t warrant the EO.”
Rani also pointed out that the police had no choice but to use
communism as a scapegoat and rebutted Nazri’s remark that the communist
ideology would infilterate the younger generation.
“The younger generation doesn’t even share the same sentiment about
May 13,” she said. “It has no significance to them like it has to the
generation that lived through it.”
“Similarly with the communist ideology. And PSM is not a communist
party. We have always looked up to those who have sacrificed for the
nation regardless of their ideology.”
‘Kumar is a good man’
The six, who are now hailed as the EO6 or PSM6, will have their
habeas corpus applications heard tomorrow. In the meantime, nightly
candlelight vigils have been held for them and over 500 police reports
have been lodged against their detention.
Even the medical profession made a rare public stand, with the
Federation of Private Medical Practitioner’s Association calling for
Jeyakumar’s immediate release.
“I respect the doctors who are openly supporting him,” Rani
acknowledged. “Kumar has been a good doctor and has a stellar
reputation. I’m glad that doctors in private practices are willing to
defend one of their own and not be cowed by pressure from the
government.”
The online media has also been peppered by letters from Jeyakumar’s
friends and colleagues who have unabashedly praised him as a “sincere”,
“humble”, “courageous” and “principled” man.
Rani, on the other hand, responds with a startled pause when asked to
describe her husband. Then she quietly said, “He is a good person. All
of what is written about him is true.”