Mahathir’s messy legacy

By Gregore Lopez - Free Malaysia Today,

COMMENT Southeast Asia has seen its fair share of authoritarian leaders. Malaysia’s Dr Mahathir Mohamad is one who still endures, albeit now on the sidelines. Ascending to the premiership of Malaysia in July 1981, and ruling until his forced retirement in October 2003, he reigned in impressive fashion.
Among the many titles that were bestowed on this poor boy from a Malaysian backwater were “respected Muslim”, “Third World leader”, and “spokesman for developing nations”.
Within the country, as overseas, he was both loathed and loved. In his quest to transform Malaysia into a “developed nation”, he used all possible means, both domestic and external, to achieve his grand vision. Seven years since his departure, what has been his legacy?
Mahathir gave Malaysia a new profile through his larger-than-life personality, ambition and action.
He developed the role of “Third World leader” when he took on Malaysia’s colonial masters through his “Buy British Last” policy. He regularly attacked the West while encouraging developing nations to work together through his frameworks of “Asian Values”, the “Look East Policy” and “South-South Cooperation”.
He weighed in on international issues such as the global environment, Antarctica and even what he termed a “New World Order”. He also stood up for the Islamic “ummah” by speaking out against its perceived opponents, and provided strong support for Palestinian and Bosnian Muslims in their struggles.
His actions in the region were more pragmatic. Mahathir — alongside other Asean leaders from Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand — saw Asean within the framework of regional security and as an expanding market for Malaysian goods and services. In ensuring regional security, Mahathir continued Malaysia’s longstanding hybrid form of neutrality.
Awkward tradition
Since independence, Malaysia has relied on Britain, Australia and New Zealand to underwrite its security but has concurrently endorsed the view that Asean should be free of big power influence. Mahathir continued this awkward tradition.
It has now been revealed that in 1984 Mahathir signed a secret defence agreement with the United States; an agreement which he deemed beneficial to Malaysia. It vastly expanded military cooperation between the two nations.
This revelation contradicts the vehement public statements that Mahathir made about not indulging
foreign, especially US, influence in Malaysia or the wider Asean region. This was classic Mahathirism: pragmatic to the point of hypocrisy.
To further strengthen Asean, both in regional security and economic terms, Mahathir encouraged the consolidation and expansion of the organisation. He strongly supported the Asean-UN International Conference on Cambodia that eventually led to a negotiated settlement between the warring sides.
Mahathir also played a key role in promoting the membership of Burma through the much-maligned policy termed “constructive engagement”. During the Mahathir era, Asean eventually came to include all 10 countries of the region.
With the end of the Cold War and the rise of China, Mahathir and Asean realised that a new platform was needed to ensure regional security and to contain China.
Damaged credibility
Mahathir therefore took an active role in the shaping of the Asean Regional Forum (ARF), Asean's post-Cold War regional security apparatus. The ARF brought together the regional powers and the United States in an effort to guarantee regional peace.
In expanding its markets and in response to the formation of the European Union (EU) and the North American Free Trade Association, Mahathir and Asean responded with another free trade agreement called the Asean Free Trade Agreement.
Notwithstanding these contributions, Mahathir’s legacy seems to be fading. This began with his treatment of Anwar Ibrahim, his able deputy whom he humiliated.
Mahathir’s credibility as an Islamic leader was damaged forever with that action. Malaysia celebrated his resignation by giving his replacement, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, the biggest-ever mandate for an incoming prime minister.
Furthermore, since his departure, the effects of his authoritarian rule are increasingly felt. The use of democratic institutions to protect corrupt leaders and to attack the opposition, the unprecedented rise of religious bigotry, and the weakening of the country’s economic fundamentals all point back to Mahathir’s years in charge.
On the regional front, Mahathir tried his best to keep Australia and the US out of the region to satisfy his own prejudices. While the US was too powerful to be ignored, Mahathir relished vetoing Australia’s involvement in Asean-related forums.
Since his departure, Australia has been granted its relevant membership and Malaysia is now more closely aligned to both Australia and the US than ever before.
While Mahathir held sway over domestic and global politics for 22 years as a courageous Third World leader, his departure was welcomed, not only by Malaysians but also by Malaysia’s neighbours. Malaysians now have the task of cleaning up the mess he left behind.
Gregore Lopez is currently pursuing a PhD in Economics at Australian National University and blogs at greglopez.wordpress.com. He also volunteers as the editor of the Malaysia section of New Mandala.