Friday, 24 January 2014
Morocco amends controversial rape marriage law
The parliament of Morocco has unanimously amended an article of the penal code that allowed rapists of underage girls to avoid prosecution by marrying their victims.
The move follows intensive lobbying by activists for better protection of young rape victims. The amendment has been welcomed by rights groups.
Article 475 of the penal code generated unprecedented public criticism.
It was first proposed by Morocco's Islamist-led government a year ago.
But the issue came to public prominence in 2012 when 16-year-old Amina Filali killed herself after being forced to marry her rapist.
The case shocked many people in Morocco, received extensive media coverage and sparked protests in the capital Rabat and other cities.
Article 475 provides for a prison term of one to five years for anyone who "abducts or deceives" a minor "without violence, threat or fraud, or attempts to do so".
But the second clause of the article specifies that when the victim marries the perpetrator, "he can no longer be prosecuted except by persons empowered to demand the annulment of the marriage and then only after the annulment has been proclaimed". This effectively prevents prosecutors from independently pursuing rape charges.
In conservative rural parts of Morocco, an unmarried girl or woman who has lost her virginity - even through rape - is considered to have dishonoured her family and no longer suitable for marriage. Some families believe that marrying the rapist addresses these problems.
While welcoming the move, rights groups say that much still needs to be done to promote gender equality, protect women and outlaw child marriage in the North African country.
"It's a very important step. But it's not enough," Fatima Maghnaoui, who heads a group supporting women victims of violence, told the AFP news agency.
"We are campaigning for a complete overhaul of the penal code for women."
Analysis
Although women activists are pleased about the amendment - and
it shows the Islamist-led government is slowly starting to listen to
them - some say there is still much room for improvement as the law does
not necessarily protect women from violence or put an emphasis on the
seriousness of rape.Rights groups say one in four women in Morocco is a victim of violence. The most vulnerable live in the countryside where only about 20% of women are literate and attitudes are more conservative. In such areas, child marriages and forced marriages after rape have been a common practice for centuries.
Women's rights groups now want new laws to reflect the spirit of the 2011 constitution. World leaders praised it, saying Morocco was a role model for democracy in the Arab world. It states that men and women should be treated equally, yet also included Article 475.
Moderate Muslim nation of Nigeria: Protesters throw stones, demand gays be executed
Thousands of protesters threw stones into the Shariah court in a north
Nigerian city Wednesday, urging the speedy convictions and executions of
11 men arrested for belonging to gay organizations.
Security officials fired into the air to disperse protesters in Bauchi city so the accused men could be safely returned to the prison. Judge El-Yakubu Aliyu closed the court abruptly.
Nigeria — Death penalty for men and whipping and/or imprisonment for women in 12 northern Nigerian states. Up to 14 years in jail in the rest of the country. 51 million in aid.
Security officials fired into the air to disperse protesters in Bauchi city so the accused men could be safely returned to the prison. Judge El-Yakubu Aliyu closed the court abruptly.
Nigeria — Death penalty for men and whipping and/or imprisonment for women in 12 northern Nigerian states. Up to 14 years in jail in the rest of the country. 51 million in aid.
Labels:
LGBT
As rakyat struggle, elite live in lap of luxury, says Ku Li
In an apparent dig at Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's frequent trips abroad, the former finance minister said the current capitalist system practised in Malaysia advocates a relationship between business and politics which then gives rise to corruption.
“What is unacceptable is the feeling that certain segments of the community are being hard done by the prevailing economic difficulties while a select few wallow in luxury as if there is no tomorrow,” he said.
"Financial pilferage as a result of corruption or political lobbying increases costs unnecessarily. In all likelihood, the costs will be borne by consumers.”
The Kelantan prince, affectionately known as Ku Li, said a strict implementation and management of Malaysia's economy under the Islamic system would eliminate this possibility.
"It is heartening and reassuring to note that Islamic economics and finance advocate efficiency, effectiveness, transparency, sharing and selflessness," Ku Li said.
He was speaking at a book launch organised by the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS) and Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn Bhd.
Also present at the launch was Prince Mohammed Al-Malek Feisal of Saudi Arabia, who is reportedly an ardent proponent of Syariah-compliant Islamic banking and finance system.
"The Islamic economic system is neither capitalistic nor socialistic in nature. It is a system which has been provided by the Quran," Ku Li said.
He said it was an ethical system which operated on the basis of shared risks and profits to the lender and borrower.
Pointing out the difference between the Islamic and conventional banking systems, Ku Li said the former chanelled wealth from the rich to the poor in the form of sadaqah and zakat.
"Under the conventional banking system, interest channels away wealth from the poor to the rich," he said.
"Islam views life as a compact whole and economics is one of its most important components. The Islamic economic system is balanced and everything has its place."
Ku Li said the system stood for simplicity, modesty, charity, mutual help and cooperation. It denounced miserliness, greed, extravagance and unnecessary wastage.
He cited the Pilgrims Management and Fund Board of Malaysia, or Tabung Haji, as an example of a successful system.
The brainchild of economist Royal Professor Ungku Aziz Ungku Abdul Hamid, Tabung Haji began with a total deposit of US$15,400 with an initial membership of 1,281 in 1963.
Last year, 8.2 million Tabung Haji members had deposits in excess of US$10 million (RM33 million). – January 23, 2014.
Labels:
Ku Li
MIC: No thanks MCA, we've faith in the AG
It was an act of brotherhood.
Irked by what it perceived to be unwarranted delay on the part of the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) in prosecuting the man accused of assaulting a fellow BN party leader, MCA Youth sought to help.
However,
the offer to prosecute the assault case of Deputy Education Minister II
P Kamalanathan was today shot down by MIC itself and the MCA Youth
legal bureau found itself being labelled “presumptuous”.
Instead, MIC’s legal adviser Selva Mookiah, in a statement, expressed full confidence in the AGC following a discussion on the case with AG Abdul Gani Patail (right) today.
“Having had the benefit of discussing the matter with Tan Sri Attorney-General today, I reiterate my confidence with the AGC in evaluating the investigation papers taking into consideration all evidence including but not limited to the eyewitness statements and medical report.
“....whilst I appreciate the MCA Youth bureau's support, but it is rather presumptuous of them to offer to prosecute without ever being privy to the investigation papers,” he said.
He further assured that Abdul Gani is giving “equally serious attention” to Kamalanathan’s case as he would any criminal report, and will decide on a course of action accordingly.
Kamalanathan had ealier this month lodged a police report claiming that Hulu Selangor Umno Youth assistant secretary Muhammad Rizuan Suhaimi had punched him in the former’s office on Jan 12.
However, with no action by the AGC despite receiving the investigation papers from the police, MCA Youth legal bureau chief Choo Wei Sern yesterday volunteered the party’s lawyers to be appointed as prosecutors on a pro bono basis to help with the case.
Choo had stated that such delays would reduce public confidence in the AGC.
Irked by what it perceived to be unwarranted delay on the part of the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) in prosecuting the man accused of assaulting a fellow BN party leader, MCA Youth sought to help.
Instead, MIC’s legal adviser Selva Mookiah, in a statement, expressed full confidence in the AGC following a discussion on the case with AG Abdul Gani Patail (right) today.
“Having had the benefit of discussing the matter with Tan Sri Attorney-General today, I reiterate my confidence with the AGC in evaluating the investigation papers taking into consideration all evidence including but not limited to the eyewitness statements and medical report.
“....whilst I appreciate the MCA Youth bureau's support, but it is rather presumptuous of them to offer to prosecute without ever being privy to the investigation papers,” he said.
He further assured that Abdul Gani is giving “equally serious attention” to Kamalanathan’s case as he would any criminal report, and will decide on a course of action accordingly.
Kamalanathan had ealier this month lodged a police report claiming that Hulu Selangor Umno Youth assistant secretary Muhammad Rizuan Suhaimi had punched him in the former’s office on Jan 12.
However, with no action by the AGC despite receiving the investigation papers from the police, MCA Youth legal bureau chief Choo Wei Sern yesterday volunteered the party’s lawyers to be appointed as prosecutors on a pro bono basis to help with the case.
Choo had stated that such delays would reduce public confidence in the AGC.
Labels:
AG chamber,
MCA,
MIC
Riza dropped from Oscar nominations
Buying over the rights and financing a film does not actually qualify one as a producer.
At least not according to Hollywood's premier motion picture body the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
In what the industry views as a "rare move", the Academy yesterday dropped prime minister Najib Abdul Razak's stepson Riza Aziz from the Oscars nominations list for best picture nominee Wolf of Wall Street.
Instead,
in the list of producers nominated for the US$100 million film are
director Martin Scorcese, lead actor Leonardo DiCaprio, Riza's business
partner Joey McFarland and Scorsese's partner Emma Tillinger Koskoff.
The list of nominated producers for the 'Wolf of Wall Street' was finalised by the Academy yesterday, a week after the other nominations were announced.
This marks a departure from the Producers Guild Association, that nominated Riza as producer but not Scorsese and DiCaprio, for the controversial film about debauchery in the world of finance.
According to entertainment website Deadline Hollywood,
DiCaprio had worked to get the film to screen as producer for six years
and had roped in Riza and McFarland's fledgling production company Red
Granite Pictures, that fully financed the venture.
Red Granite then purchased the rights from Warner Bros and was caught in a legal battle with the original producer Alexandra Milchan for compensation. The matter has been resolved out of court.
Responding to the Academy's announcement, Red Granite, in a media statement, said it will not contest the decision and that Riza is honoured to have been part of the project.
Riza is the son of Najib's wife Rosmah Mansor from her first marriage.
The movie has been banned in Malaysia, and his financing of the film has drawn scorn from right-wing Malay supremacists Perkasa.
Hollywood disdain
Meanwhile, whistleblower Sarawak Report as part of its expose on Riza cited “Hollywood insiders” as saying that the decision to dump Riza follow industry concerns over financiers “attempting to claim producer credits for films they bankrolled but did not make”.
“They are greener than green,” one “experienced producer” told Sarawak Report of Riza and McFarland, whom the portal reported previously acted as party planned for Malaysian wheeler dealer Jho Low (right).
“They are financiers, but have also taken producer credits. The producer credits have gone to Riza, Joey and some other producers, but the actual work is being done by people working for Red Granite and the other producers,” another unnamed “senior Hollywood producer” is quoted as saying.
Those in the know credit Milchan as the main driver for the film, having procured the rights to the Jordan Belfort (the jailed financier played by DiCaprio) story and commissioned the script before the project was taken up by Warner Bros.
Insiders say it was her who roped in DiCaprio and Scorsese, despite the Red Granite duo claiming to have done so in media reports, citing their friendship with the Hollywood heartthrob.
They also claim that that Milchan “came back and took over” after Warner Bros dropped the film and then sold it to Red Granite.
“It's common knowledge. That is what producers do, but Red Granite just bought over a done deal. They aren't what I would call producers, they are financiers and money men,” one insider said.
Industry
professionals told the website that while the film cost US$100 million,
publicity and marketing would have cost an additional US$35-40 million.
The film has grossed US$80 million so far, the insiders said, but producers only get a fraction of the takings.
“The threatre keeps 60 percent and the studio 40 percent, then there are all the payments before the producers get anything back,” one Hollywood professional is quoted as saying.
Deep pockets
Insiders also revealed that the film was not “pre-sold” for three months after it started production, and everything was on Red Granite's expense.
Sarawak Report noted that the new kids on the block's deep pockets have also set tongues wagging, with seasoned professionals questioning the rookies' ability to raise so much funds.
It also reported that there is speculation that Riza was cut by the Academy over comments by "close friends" in Malaysian media which could be viewed as anti-semitic.
The Malaysian Gazette,
a portal run by a journalist close to Riza's mother Rosmah Mansor,
quoted these “close friends” as saying that Riza should be celebrated
for “breaking the monopoly of Jews in Hollywood”.
Riza, it reported, has never made any overt statements of bigotry but such sentiments by Riza's “close friends” and his failure to “disown” the remakrs have “appalled the liberal and egalitarian community in Hollywood”.
“Many of Hollywood’s high flyers are indeed rightfully proud of being Americans of Jewish heritage.
“However, America is passionately committed to success through merit, unlike in Malaysia, where it is increasingly complained that only certain well-connected families can expect to monopolise money-making opportunities.”
Sarawak Report had earlier exposed that Riza had purchased a US$17.5 million ((RM58.21 million mansion) in Hollywood, after purchasing a US$33.5 million (RM110 million) apartment in New York in 2010.
It reported that Riza, 36, worked with HSBC Bank in London for three years before making his Hollywood bid.
At least not according to Hollywood's premier motion picture body the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
In what the industry views as a "rare move", the Academy yesterday dropped prime minister Najib Abdul Razak's stepson Riza Aziz from the Oscars nominations list for best picture nominee Wolf of Wall Street.
The list of nominated producers for the 'Wolf of Wall Street' was finalised by the Academy yesterday, a week after the other nominations were announced.
This marks a departure from the Producers Guild Association, that nominated Riza as producer but not Scorsese and DiCaprio, for the controversial film about debauchery in the world of finance.
Red Granite then purchased the rights from Warner Bros and was caught in a legal battle with the original producer Alexandra Milchan for compensation. The matter has been resolved out of court.
Responding to the Academy's announcement, Red Granite, in a media statement, said it will not contest the decision and that Riza is honoured to have been part of the project.
Riza is the son of Najib's wife Rosmah Mansor from her first marriage.
The movie has been banned in Malaysia, and his financing of the film has drawn scorn from right-wing Malay supremacists Perkasa.
Hollywood disdain
Meanwhile, whistleblower Sarawak Report as part of its expose on Riza cited “Hollywood insiders” as saying that the decision to dump Riza follow industry concerns over financiers “attempting to claim producer credits for films they bankrolled but did not make”.
“They are financiers, but have also taken producer credits. The producer credits have gone to Riza, Joey and some other producers, but the actual work is being done by people working for Red Granite and the other producers,” another unnamed “senior Hollywood producer” is quoted as saying.
Those in the know credit Milchan as the main driver for the film, having procured the rights to the Jordan Belfort (the jailed financier played by DiCaprio) story and commissioned the script before the project was taken up by Warner Bros.
Insiders say it was her who roped in DiCaprio and Scorsese, despite the Red Granite duo claiming to have done so in media reports, citing their friendship with the Hollywood heartthrob.
They also claim that that Milchan “came back and took over” after Warner Bros dropped the film and then sold it to Red Granite.
“It's common knowledge. That is what producers do, but Red Granite just bought over a done deal. They aren't what I would call producers, they are financiers and money men,” one insider said.
The film has grossed US$80 million so far, the insiders said, but producers only get a fraction of the takings.
“The threatre keeps 60 percent and the studio 40 percent, then there are all the payments before the producers get anything back,” one Hollywood professional is quoted as saying.
Deep pockets
Insiders also revealed that the film was not “pre-sold” for three months after it started production, and everything was on Red Granite's expense.
Sarawak Report noted that the new kids on the block's deep pockets have also set tongues wagging, with seasoned professionals questioning the rookies' ability to raise so much funds.
It also reported that there is speculation that Riza was cut by the Academy over comments by "close friends" in Malaysian media which could be viewed as anti-semitic.
Riza, it reported, has never made any overt statements of bigotry but such sentiments by Riza's “close friends” and his failure to “disown” the remakrs have “appalled the liberal and egalitarian community in Hollywood”.
“Many of Hollywood’s high flyers are indeed rightfully proud of being Americans of Jewish heritage.
“However, America is passionately committed to success through merit, unlike in Malaysia, where it is increasingly complained that only certain well-connected families can expect to monopolise money-making opportunities.”
Sarawak Report had earlier exposed that Riza had purchased a US$17.5 million ((RM58.21 million mansion) in Hollywood, after purchasing a US$33.5 million (RM110 million) apartment in New York in 2010.
It reported that Riza, 36, worked with HSBC Bank in London for three years before making his Hollywood bid.
Labels:
Rosmah
'Consumer goods will be pricier due to toll hike'
The Federation of Malaysian
Manufacturers (FMM) has warned that an increase in tolled road charges
will raise prices of consumer goods.
In a press release today, FMM said that a survey among its members
revealed that higher toll charges would result in an increase in the
price of raw materials.
"Given the recent increase in electricity rates, the proposed toll hikes
would definitely put pressure on inflation and FMM foresees that these
increases would dampen domestic consumption and affect export
competitiveness.
"FMM strongly urges the toll concessionaires to review their decision to
increase the toll rates and the government to intervene to prevent any
further increase in the cost of doing business in Malaysia," said FMM.
FMM did not state the number of respondents involved, but specified that
68 percent of its members are SMEs operating in the Klang Valley.
The group said that all respondents agreed that transportation providers
will increase their fees if toll charges were increased, coupled with
an increase in travelling claims of their marketing staff.
Forty-six percent of respondents believe that the price of transportantion will go up by 2 to 10 percent, while 18 percent of respondents said 11 to 20 percent and 15 percent of respondents said 25 to 30 percent.
No alternatives
Forty-six percent of respondents believe that the price of transportantion will go up by 2 to 10 percent, while 18 percent of respondents said 11 to 20 percent and 15 percent of respondents said 25 to 30 percent.
No alternatives
Lebuhraya Damansara Puchong (LDP) is the most frequently used highway
among the respondents, followed by the Guthrie Corridor Expressway,
Kajang Dispersal Link Expressway (Silk), Sungai Besi Expressway
(Besraya) and Sistem Penyuraian Trafik KL Barat (Sprint).
"A total of 64 percent of the respondents informed that they or their
transporters do not have alternative routes to deliver goods to points
of destination," said the group.
Highway toll charges were supposed to increase on Jan 1, but nothing has been heard of since.
Tolled road operators generally have an agreement with the federal
government which allowed them to periodically increase charges.
Should Putrajaya stop them from increasing the charges, compensation -
either through subsidies or extension of concession period - would be
arranged.
The Najib-administration is currently under pressure to keep the prices
of essential goods down while reigning in on a budget deficit.
Since the 13th general election in May last year, Putrajaya has
abolished sugar subsidies and reduced fuel subsidies, while increasing
electricity tariffs to reduce public spending.
Labels:
price hike
Stop being wishy washy on CSMU, Subra
From P Waythamoorthy,
Hindraf is disappointed with the lackluster attitude and indecisiveness of the health minister S Subramaniam in handling the re-accreditation of Crimea State Medical University (CSMU).
It is clear that both MMC and the health ministry are indulging in the passing the buck game between them with contradictory statements without having the ability to be transparent in addressing the issue.
On Sept 23, 2013, Subra’s deputy confirmed in Parliament that there are two MMC officers currently under investigation by the MACC for corruption and power abuse.
Lately, it has surfaced through local media that apparently there are two different reports by the MMC in their evaluation for re-accreditation of CSMU.
From the above, there is an obvious concern on the murky direction of MMC, its operations as well as its role as an independent governing body for the medical profession.
The health minister must make an assertive and firm decision as Section 8 of the Medical Ac 1971 gives him the authority to re-recognise the university instead of dragging the matter any further.
Approximately 1,500 Malaysian students have graduated from CSMU since 1997 until it was derecognised in 2005.
Many of these students were from struggling and middle class families who were able to pursue their medical education in the said university due to its affordable tuition fees.
The said university was derecognised in 2005 although former Health Minister Liow Tiong Lai told parliament on Aug 12, 2009 that there were no quality issues with CSMU.
For the last eight years the university has been fighting an uphill task in obtaining re-accreditation in futility.
The least the ministry could do is award the university a probationary accreditation subject to an undertaking by the university to comply with the ministry’s requirement.
This is so that in the interim, students can start enrolling with them and pursue their medical studies with affordable fees.
The writer is chairman of Hindraf
Hindraf is disappointed with the lackluster attitude and indecisiveness of the health minister S Subramaniam in handling the re-accreditation of Crimea State Medical University (CSMU).
It is clear that both MMC and the health ministry are indulging in the passing the buck game between them with contradictory statements without having the ability to be transparent in addressing the issue.
On Sept 23, 2013, Subra’s deputy confirmed in Parliament that there are two MMC officers currently under investigation by the MACC for corruption and power abuse.
Lately, it has surfaced through local media that apparently there are two different reports by the MMC in their evaluation for re-accreditation of CSMU.
From the above, there is an obvious concern on the murky direction of MMC, its operations as well as its role as an independent governing body for the medical profession.
The health minister must make an assertive and firm decision as Section 8 of the Medical Ac 1971 gives him the authority to re-recognise the university instead of dragging the matter any further.
Approximately 1,500 Malaysian students have graduated from CSMU since 1997 until it was derecognised in 2005.
Many of these students were from struggling and middle class families who were able to pursue their medical education in the said university due to its affordable tuition fees.
The said university was derecognised in 2005 although former Health Minister Liow Tiong Lai told parliament on Aug 12, 2009 that there were no quality issues with CSMU.
For the last eight years the university has been fighting an uphill task in obtaining re-accreditation in futility.
The least the ministry could do is award the university a probationary accreditation subject to an undertaking by the university to comply with the ministry’s requirement.
This is so that in the interim, students can start enrolling with them and pursue their medical studies with affordable fees.
The writer is chairman of Hindraf
Labels:
Hindraf
Court says MIC man got RM5.5m by fraud
The party's new treasurer-general, R Ramanan, is ordered to return the money to ex-government psychiatrist M Mahadevan.
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court today ordered recently appointed MIC treasurer-general R Ramanan to return RM5.5 million to renowned psychiatrist Dr M Mahadevan, ruling that it was fraudulently received.
Judicial commissioner Lee Heng Cheong said Ramanan had misrepresented himself to Dr Mahadevan, resulting in the latter transferring the money into his personal account on May 19, 2010.
Lee also ruled that Ramanan had failed to prove that the money was for a township development project in Sungai Petani on a piece of land belonging to Dr Mahadevan.
The judge ordered Ramanan to pay the money within 14 days from today. Counsel for the defendant sought a stay and Lee ordered them to file a formal application by Monday.
Dr Mahadevan, 85, is a former chief government psychiatrist and founder of the Malaysian Psychiatric Association. He was in court when the judgment was delivered.
According to court documents, the plaintiff had filed a claim of RM26.6 million to the Defence Ministry for its use of his land as a firing range between 1968 and 1988.
In May 2010, Ramanan told Dr Mahadevan that he could help him secure the claim if he paid a sum of RM6.5 million. They subsequently agreed on reducing the amount to RM5.5 million.
In his statement of claim, Dr Mahadevan included a letter dated April 2010, furnished by the defendant, who claimed that it was from the Defence Ministry. The letter purportedly showed that the ministry had approved payment of the claim.
The plaintiff called nine witnesses, including four officers of the ministry and a handwriting expert. The witnesses testified that such a letter did not exist.
There were six witnesses for Ramanan, including himself and his father.
Dr Mahadevan was represented by Lavinia Kumaraendran and Cassandra Lee, while the defendant was represented by Harjit Singh and Mahendra Maheson.
Judicial commissioner Lee Heng Cheong said Ramanan had misrepresented himself to Dr Mahadevan, resulting in the latter transferring the money into his personal account on May 19, 2010.
Lee also ruled that Ramanan had failed to prove that the money was for a township development project in Sungai Petani on a piece of land belonging to Dr Mahadevan.
The judge ordered Ramanan to pay the money within 14 days from today. Counsel for the defendant sought a stay and Lee ordered them to file a formal application by Monday.
Dr Mahadevan, 85, is a former chief government psychiatrist and founder of the Malaysian Psychiatric Association. He was in court when the judgment was delivered.
According to court documents, the plaintiff had filed a claim of RM26.6 million to the Defence Ministry for its use of his land as a firing range between 1968 and 1988.
In May 2010, Ramanan told Dr Mahadevan that he could help him secure the claim if he paid a sum of RM6.5 million. They subsequently agreed on reducing the amount to RM5.5 million.
In his statement of claim, Dr Mahadevan included a letter dated April 2010, furnished by the defendant, who claimed that it was from the Defence Ministry. The letter purportedly showed that the ministry had approved payment of the claim.
The plaintiff called nine witnesses, including four officers of the ministry and a handwriting expert. The witnesses testified that such a letter did not exist.
There were six witnesses for Ramanan, including himself and his father.
Dr Mahadevan was represented by Lavinia Kumaraendran and Cassandra Lee, while the defendant was represented by Harjit Singh and Mahendra Maheson.
Labels:
MIC
Umno board to decide on Kamalanathan assault incident
The Umno member who punched Deputy Education Minister II P Kamalanthan has replied to the show-cause letter and it is up to the disciplinary board take action.
KUALA LUMPUR: The Umno disciplinary board will soon take action on the party member who assaulted Deputy Education Minister II P Kamalanathan during an event in Bukit Beruntung on Jan 12.
Umno secretary-general Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said Hulu Selangor division youth assistant secretary Muhammad Rizuan Suhaimi had replied to the show-cause letter issued to him a week ago.
“I have forwarded his reply to the disciplinary board. It is up to the disciplinary board to take action.
“I asked him to reply to the show-cause letter within 14 days,” he said in a press statement today.
In the Jan 12 incident in Bukit Beruntung, Kamalanathan was punched after the deputy minister ignored Muhammad Rizuan’s request to transfer his relative to Selangor.
Tengku Adnan also said 10 show-cause letters would be sent to Pahang Umno Youth leaders who held a press conference to express their disappointment with Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin.
The Pahang Youth leaders were dissatisifed with Khairy’s appointment of Pekan Division Youth chief Shahruddin Ahmad as the state Youth chief.
Tengku Adnan said it was unbecoming of the youth leaders to behave in such a manner.
“They should have discussed with Khairy first, instead of speaking out at a press conference.
“Khairy had the right to appoint Shahruddin as the state Youth chief,” said Tengku Adnan.
He said he had also spoken to Kedah Menteri Besar Mukhriz Mahathir for coming out with statements regarding the party.
“Instead of coming out with statements, Mukhriz should voice it out to us or even meet the Prime Minister or his deputy to discuss any issues,” he added.
Umno secretary-general Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said Hulu Selangor division youth assistant secretary Muhammad Rizuan Suhaimi had replied to the show-cause letter issued to him a week ago.
“I have forwarded his reply to the disciplinary board. It is up to the disciplinary board to take action.
“I asked him to reply to the show-cause letter within 14 days,” he said in a press statement today.
In the Jan 12 incident in Bukit Beruntung, Kamalanathan was punched after the deputy minister ignored Muhammad Rizuan’s request to transfer his relative to Selangor.
Tengku Adnan also said 10 show-cause letters would be sent to Pahang Umno Youth leaders who held a press conference to express their disappointment with Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin.
The Pahang Youth leaders were dissatisifed with Khairy’s appointment of Pekan Division Youth chief Shahruddin Ahmad as the state Youth chief.
Tengku Adnan said it was unbecoming of the youth leaders to behave in such a manner.
“They should have discussed with Khairy first, instead of speaking out at a press conference.
“Khairy had the right to appoint Shahruddin as the state Youth chief,” said Tengku Adnan.
He said he had also spoken to Kedah Menteri Besar Mukhriz Mahathir for coming out with statements regarding the party.
“Instead of coming out with statements, Mukhriz should voice it out to us or even meet the Prime Minister or his deputy to discuss any issues,” he added.
Cabinet stands by ‘Allah’ in Malay Bibles but…
...the 10-point solution cannot supersede state law, says Youth and Sports Minister Khairy Jamaluddin.
PETALING JAYA: Amid the re-ignited furore over the ‘Allah’ row, the Cabinet still stands by its commitment to the 10-point solution allowing Malay and Iban bibles to use the word ‘Allah’ and the import of the bibles into the country.
Youth and Sports Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said the issue of over 300 Malay and Iban language Bibles being seized by the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) earlier this month was a state matter and the federal government would not intervene.
“Our (Cabinet) position is clear. The federal government is committed to the 10-point solution.
“But the 10-point solution can’t supersede the state enactment of religious issues,” Khairy was quoted by Bernama as telling reporters after speaking at the 16th Malaysia Strategic Outlook Conference 2014 in Kuala Lumpur today.
He also reportedly blamed Selangor for reigniting the decades-long debate with Jais’s raid on the Bible of Society of Malaysia (BSM) earlier this month, which saw two of the society’s leaders arrested and released later that same evening.
Khairy, who is the Umno Youth chief, added the Selangor government should resolve that issue first before any dialogue was held between Pakatan Rakyat and BN.
“That issue has to be resolved first before any dialogue between BN and Pakatan. There’s nothing that we can do,” Khairy was quoted as saying by a news portal.
Khairy was referring to Anwar’s invitation yesterday for bipartisan talks between the two coalitions on economic and racial issues plaguing the country.
He added that the Cabinet had discussed the Allah issue in its meeting yesterday.
The 10-point-solution, announced by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Idris Jala in 2011, allows bibles in all languages to not only be imported into the country, but to be printed locally in the peninsula, Sabah and Sarawak.
However, the Malay edition of those bibles contain the word ‘Allah’, a word non-Muslims were prohibited from using in Selangor.
The Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah had also said last Sunday that several words including ‘Allah’ were the exclusive rights of Muslims, citing a 1986 decree by the National Fatwa council.
Youth and Sports Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said the issue of over 300 Malay and Iban language Bibles being seized by the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) earlier this month was a state matter and the federal government would not intervene.
“Our (Cabinet) position is clear. The federal government is committed to the 10-point solution.
“But the 10-point solution can’t supersede the state enactment of religious issues,” Khairy was quoted by Bernama as telling reporters after speaking at the 16th Malaysia Strategic Outlook Conference 2014 in Kuala Lumpur today.
He also reportedly blamed Selangor for reigniting the decades-long debate with Jais’s raid on the Bible of Society of Malaysia (BSM) earlier this month, which saw two of the society’s leaders arrested and released later that same evening.
Khairy, who is the Umno Youth chief, added the Selangor government should resolve that issue first before any dialogue was held between Pakatan Rakyat and BN.
“That issue has to be resolved first before any dialogue between BN and Pakatan. There’s nothing that we can do,” Khairy was quoted as saying by a news portal.
Khairy was referring to Anwar’s invitation yesterday for bipartisan talks between the two coalitions on economic and racial issues plaguing the country.
He added that the Cabinet had discussed the Allah issue in its meeting yesterday.
The 10-point-solution, announced by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Idris Jala in 2011, allows bibles in all languages to not only be imported into the country, but to be printed locally in the peninsula, Sabah and Sarawak.
However, the Malay edition of those bibles contain the word ‘Allah’, a word non-Muslims were prohibited from using in Selangor.
The Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah had also said last Sunday that several words including ‘Allah’ were the exclusive rights of Muslims, citing a 1986 decree by the National Fatwa council.
Labels:
Allah issue
Suggest Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat form a joint Summit secretariat comprising three representatives to decide on date, place and agenda of BN-PR Summit
The Barisan Nasional secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor told The Malaysian Insider that the proposal by Pakatan Rakyat leaders for a Barisan Nasional-Pakatan Rakyat Leaders’ Summit will be discussed by the Barisan Nasional Supreme Council meeting tomorrow.
I welcome the prompt response of the Barisan Nasional in convening its Supreme Council tomorrow and hope that the BN Supreme Council will give a positive response to the PR proposal for a summit of the leaders of both coalitions to assure Malaysians that there could not be another May 13 riots, although there are irresponsible and reckless elements seeking to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension to create the conditions for another May 13 in the country.
The proposal by the Pakatan Rakyat leaders from PKR, PAS and DAP stem from their love and patriotism to Malaysia and I hope that the Barisan Nasional leaders could be similarly motivated by their love and patriotism to Malaysia to give a positive response to hold the first BN-PR Leaders’ Summit in the nation’s history.
If the BN Supreme Council gives a positive response tomorrow, I suggest that BN and PR form a joint Summit secretariat comprising three representatives each to decide on the Summit’s date, place and agenda.
I am sure that all Malaysians look forward to the successful holding of the first BN-PR Leaders’ Summit.
PR leaders have proposed the agenda to assure Malaysians that there could not be another May 13. The Summit could also deal with the quintuplet of the national crisis in the country, national unity and nation building, economic, educational, security and the worsening corruption in the country.
(Media Conference Statement in Yong Peng after a Chinese New Year visit on Thursday, 23rd January 2014 at 5 pm)
I welcome the prompt response of the Barisan Nasional in convening its Supreme Council tomorrow and hope that the BN Supreme Council will give a positive response to the PR proposal for a summit of the leaders of both coalitions to assure Malaysians that there could not be another May 13 riots, although there are irresponsible and reckless elements seeking to incite racial and religious hatred, conflict and tension to create the conditions for another May 13 in the country.
The proposal by the Pakatan Rakyat leaders from PKR, PAS and DAP stem from their love and patriotism to Malaysia and I hope that the Barisan Nasional leaders could be similarly motivated by their love and patriotism to Malaysia to give a positive response to hold the first BN-PR Leaders’ Summit in the nation’s history.
If the BN Supreme Council gives a positive response tomorrow, I suggest that BN and PR form a joint Summit secretariat comprising three representatives each to decide on the Summit’s date, place and agenda.
I am sure that all Malaysians look forward to the successful holding of the first BN-PR Leaders’ Summit.
PR leaders have proposed the agenda to assure Malaysians that there could not be another May 13. The Summit could also deal with the quintuplet of the national crisis in the country, national unity and nation building, economic, educational, security and the worsening corruption in the country.
(Media Conference Statement in Yong Peng after a Chinese New Year visit on Thursday, 23rd January 2014 at 5 pm)
“Allah”: The PR’s failure
The Nut Graph
Shape of a Pocket by Jacqueline Ann Surin
Shape of a Pocket by Jacqueline Ann Surin
As published in The Nut Graph on 13 Jan 2014.
IT’S not hard at all to be disappointed and distressed by the Barisan Nasional (BN) federal government over the way the “Allah” issue has developed and been handled. And there is no doubt in my mind that the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais)
raid on the Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM) would not have occurred if
not for Putrajaya’s pivotal role in banning the word among non-Muslims.
It was the BN
federal government that first banned the Al-Kitab, or the
Malay-language Bible, nationwide in 1981. And then, in 1986, the BN
government banned the use of “Allah” and three other words – “solat”,
“Kaabah” and “Baitullah” – by non-Muslims.
Malay-speaking Christians in Malaysia have been using “Allah”
and Malay translations of the Bible have existed since the 16th
century. This neither created “confusion” among Muslims nor posed any
“threat” to Islam before the ban in the 1980s.
And
while all of that is true, it is equally disappointing and distressing
to see how poorly the Pakatan Rakyat (PR)-led Selangor government and
the coalition’s leadership are currently responding to the 2 Jan 2014
Jais raid. Even more troubling is the PR leadership’s failure in
demonstrating that it will and can uphold the constitutional rights of
minority non-Muslims in the state.
Worse than silence
Peace-loving Malaysians are justifiably outraged at Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s
silence over the Jais raid. Najib has remained silent and invisible for
far too long over numerous instances when bigoted voices have caused
unnecessary tensions between Malaysians of different faiths. Is Selangor
Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim’s response to the Jais raid any less disappointing?
It took Khalid, who is from Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), six days to make a statement about the unconstitutional
and illegal raid on BSM. This was despite Jais having no jurisdiction
over non-Muslims. There was also no evidence that the over 300 Malay and
Iban-language Bibles confiscated from a storeroom were being used to proselytise to Muslims, which is a crime according to Malaysian laws.
Shouldn’t
Khalid have instantly spoken out against the use of force and
aggression by a state apparatus against an entity that had not broken
the law and was not threatening the peace? According to BSM president
Lee Min Choon, Jais officers acted like “thugs”, repeatedly threatening
to break down the door, causing him to fear for his staff’s safety. Lee
added that the five Jais
officers who were eventually allowed to enter the BSM office started
ransacking and throwing around boxes that contained Bibles with no
regard for the Christian holy book.
Instead, Khalid’s administration first claimed ignorance of Jais’s actions, saying the religious department had not given the Selangor government prior notice. Then, two days after the raid, the Selangor exco responsible for religious affairs, Sallehen Mukhyi, urged the public to abide by the Selangor sultan’s
decree: “The state government takes the same position as the Selangor
sultan that all parties must respect Islam as the official religion
while non-Muslims may practise their respective beliefs according to the
federal constitution.”
Will Selangor uphold rights?
Sallehen,
on behalf of the Selangor government, shied away from stating whether
non-Muslims could use “Allah” in Selangor. Neither did the Selangor
government condemn Jais’s
actions. Indeed, Sallehen has since come out to say that Jais’s
actions, thuggish as they were, “was correct in terms of SOP (standard
operating procedure)”. The only concession is that the state government
has asked the religious department to revise its SOP. However, no time
frame was given for this to happen. Additionally, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council is now at odds with the state government over the government’s authority to review Jais’s SOP.
This
is vexing considering that this is the second time Jais has raided
premises belonging to Christians. In 2011, Jais also illegally raided Damansara Utama Methodist Church during a fund-raising dinner.
These
statements from the Selangor government demonstrate just how
emasculated and unclear the PR seems to be over the issue. The Selangor
sultan had decreed that non-Muslims in the state are barred from using
“Allah”. As has been pointed out, this decree is not legally binding and
is, thereby, unconstitutional. It is also problematic since the state anthem contains the word “Allah”.
And
while the ruler may be head of Islam in the state, he is not above the
constitution and does not have jurisdiction over non-Islamic matters
such as how Malay-speaking Christians choose to worship. And yet, when
asked about the Selangor government’s stand on the sultan’s decree, Khalid was reported to have said: “… We continue the Sultan’s decree.”
Additionally, it surely cannot have escaped the Selangor government that BSM had abided by the Cabinet’s 10-point agreement
over Malay-language Bibles. Not only that, BSM’s storage and
distribution of Malay and Iban-language Bibles for Christian use was
neither illegal nor a sign of disrespect to Islam as the official
religion.
And
yet, Khalid, who is a second-term menteri besar, said the state
government would advise non-Muslim religious leaders to abide by a
flawed Selangor Non-Islamic Religions (Control of Propagation Among Muslims) Enactment 1988, which Jais used to raid BSM. It is this enactment that bans the use of 35 words by non-Muslims in Selangor including “Allah”.
“…
We will advise maybe to not use these Bibles in Selangor, but to be
used elsewhere,” Khalid was quoted as saying. This provides yet another
dilemma. When it is proven that the confiscated Bibles have abided by
the cabinet’s 10-point agreement with Christians, will Khalid still
insist that these holy books cannot be used in the state?
How
are minority faith groups supposed to “practise their respective
beliefs according to the federal constitution” if their very
constitutional right to do so is being threatened and forcibly snatched
away by a department under the Selangor government? And how can
Christians in Selangor trust the PR government when the menteri besar is
advising them not to use their Malay-language Bible in the state?
None
of these remarks thus far illustrate that that the current Selangor
government will have the courage to uphold non-Muslim rights to
“practise their respective beliefs”. Instead, the state’s official
response has demonstrated a lack of understanding about what that
constitutional right means. It has also shown a clear lack of commitment
to speaking out against any decree or action that may threaten that
constitutional right.
What’s the difference?
The
PR keeps promising citizens it’s different from the BN, and that’s why
we should vote for them. And yet in this particular instance, is the PR
really any different from the BN?
First, the Selangor government has displayed a lacking in both clarity and courage. And then, PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim poured cold water on a proposal by three DAP
assemblypersons to amend the Selangor Non-Islamic Religions (Control of
Propagation Among Muslims) Enactment. The trio suggested a win-win
situation – amending the enactment so that it could not be used to
restrict anyone from practising their faith while ensuring that Muslims
are protected from proselytisation.
Instead
of supporting the trio’s initiative and leadership, Anwar was more
interested in ticking the trio off. Not only that, he received PAS’s support for doing so. Furthermore, PAS Shah Alam Member of Parliament Khalid Samad told the three assemblypersons not to “interfere in Islamic affairs”.
We
already know that the Najib administration will only act in Umno’s
narrow ethnocentric interest. And that means continuing to suffer
Najib’s silence and inaction when clear leadership is most needed. The
recent Jais raid proves that it’s not much different with the PR,
especially with PKR and PAS.
These
politicians, who want us to vote them into federal government, aren’t
ready to be courageous, principled leaders when it is their turn to
demonstrate leadership. Apparently, like the BN, we can expect them to
act in ways that are politically expedient. How disappointing when what
is most needed now is clear, courageous and committed leadership in the
public’s interest.
Jacqueline Ann Surin thinks it’s disingenuous of the PR
to blame the “Allah” issue on the BN. Why? Because the current Selangor
government isn’t willing to oppose an enactment and a royal edict that
expands on and supports the BN’s banning of the use of certain Arabic
words by non-Muslims. She regards the Muslims who turned up to support
Christians at Our Lady of Lourdes Church in Klang on 5 Jan 2014 as having more courage and integrity than either BN or PR politicians.
Labels:
Allah issue
Optimise Use Of ILKAs To Produce More Skilled Workers - Najib
He said the percentage of skilled workers in the country was still low, at 28 per cent last year, and as such various initiatives need to be taken to raise the figure.
"The ILKAs throughout the country have the capacity to train 200,000 people at any one time.
"Imagine, if the capacity of this 434 ILKAs can be optimised, we won't have to build new institutes and buildings but instead we can optimise assets already available in the public service system," he said at the Prime Minister's Golden Hand ceremony held at the Malaysia Agro Exposition Park in Serdang near here Thursday.
Also present were Human Resource Minister Datuk Seri Richard Riot Jaem and Works Minister Datuk Fadillah Yusof.
Najib said there were now 753 Private Skills Training Institutes (ILKS) authorised by the Skills Development Department to provide skills training nationwide.
"I believe ILKAs and ILKS play significant roles in assisting the government produce skilled manpower to meet the needs of industries and boost the country's competitive edge.
"Therefore, the programmes offered have to be modified in line with current developments to ensure marketability of graduates," he said.
He reminded both ILKAs and ILKS to cooperate holistically in raising the quality of skills training by optimising their facilities and expertise.
Najib also called on trainees to further their studies to internationally recognised institutions for better value in the employment market.
Recognising the need for skilled manpower, Najib said the government had allocated RM200 million in the 2014 Budget to upgrade and enforce double shifts at National Youth Skills Institutes as well as RM178 million to improve and maintain buildings and equipment at the Manpower Department Training Institutions in line with the latest technology.
Apart from that, he said Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Berhad also provided an allocation of RM400 million for registered companies to give employees upskilling and reskilling training.
"An allocation of RM330 million has also been channeled to the Skills Development Fund Corporation as loans for post-SPM youths take up skills training courses," he said.
Najib said the government had also created an initiative under the SkillsMalaysia InVITE programme with the aim of bringing in international students to undergo skills training in the country and currently, there were 2,119 international students taking up such programmes.
Meanwhile, Najib described skills competitions as an important agenda in mainstream skills training and platform to unearth talents, creativity and innovation among trainees and competent teaching staff.
He said the organising of the skills contests should be expanded and continued to support national skills manpower development for a competitive workforce.
"The skills competition profile in Malaysia should also be upgraded so that the agenda could be empowered to international level.
"I urge more private companies to give undivided support in sponsoring skills contests and employment opportunities to winners and participants especially at international level," he said.
Najib also expressed hope that national representatives in the Asean Skills Competition in Hanoi, Vietnam this year and the World Skills Competition in Sao Paolo next year would bring back honours for the country and prove Malaysian skills were of world class standard.
At the ceremony, Najib also announced additional incentives of RM10,000 for winners of the Prime Minister's Golden Hand Award for the MySkills category and the 2014 Malaysia Skills competition.
Labels:
Najib
Thursday, 23 January 2014
Stop Cow Slaughter in Bharat. Mammoth Protest against Morba Slaughterhouse by 25,000 Hindus.
STOP COW SLAUGHTER AND SLAUGHTER HOUSES IN BHARAT. VANDE GOMATARAM.
‘I will not leave Raigad till Morba slaughter-house is demolished !’ – Vow taken by Jain-Muni Pujya Vinamrasagarji Maharaj.
Mammoth protest against Morba slaughterhouse by 25,000 Hindus.
Pujya Muniji addressed a huge gathering of 25,000 Hindu people. Shiv Sena MP, Anant Gite, MLA from Mahad, Shri. Bharat sheth Gogavale, Shiv Sena Raigad District – President, Shri. Baban dada Patil, BJP’s Shri. Atul Bhatkhalkar, its Raigad District – President, Shri. Balasaheb Patil, ‘Morba slaughter-house Demolition Committee’s President, Shri. Vijayraj ji Khule, office – bearer, Shri. Anil Chopra and VHP’s Konkan regional President, advocate Deepak Gaikwad shared the dais with Maharaj.
Shri. Khule said on the occasion, “The stay order passed by District Collector and District Superintendent is only a short impediment; but the issue will be considered as ended only after demolition of slaughter-house. Guardian Minister, Sunil Tatkare has today told the reporters that slaughter-house would not be allowed to come up; but if he had made the same statement 8 days back, so much of manpower and money spent for organizing this protest march, could have been saved.
Advocate Deepak Gaikwad said that the company constructing slaughter-house has even deceived the Government. The Administration has done its job honestly; but the slaughter house has come up due to pressurization tactics used by politicians. There was a need to take prompt action against the slaughter-house by demolishing the same.
District Administration issues notice to slaughter-house under Section 45 !
The District Administration took note of agitation against Morba slaughter-house issuing a notice to this slaughter-house under Section 45; but this notice was not accepted; therefore, the Regional officer stuck its copy on the wall of slaughter-house doing ‘Panchanama’. The slaughter-house will have to present its side by 18th February.
Courtesy: HJS.
‘I will not leave Raigad till Morba slaughter-house is demolished !’ – Vow taken by Jain-Muni Pujya Vinamrasagarji Maharaj.
Mammoth protest against Morba slaughterhouse by 25,000 Hindus.
- Resolve to set up ‘Gou-raksha Samiti’ in every village in Raigad !
- Appeal to people to vote for such party that shows guts to demolish Morba slaughter-house !
- Total ‘Bandh’ observed in Raigad !
Pujya Muniji addressed a huge gathering of 25,000 Hindu people. Shiv Sena MP, Anant Gite, MLA from Mahad, Shri. Bharat sheth Gogavale, Shiv Sena Raigad District – President, Shri. Baban dada Patil, BJP’s Shri. Atul Bhatkhalkar, its Raigad District – President, Shri. Balasaheb Patil, ‘Morba slaughter-house Demolition Committee’s President, Shri. Vijayraj ji Khule, office – bearer, Shri. Anil Chopra and VHP’s Konkan regional President, advocate Deepak Gaikwad shared the dais with Maharaj.
Shri. Khule said on the occasion, “The stay order passed by District Collector and District Superintendent is only a short impediment; but the issue will be considered as ended only after demolition of slaughter-house. Guardian Minister, Sunil Tatkare has today told the reporters that slaughter-house would not be allowed to come up; but if he had made the same statement 8 days back, so much of manpower and money spent for organizing this protest march, could have been saved.
Advocate Deepak Gaikwad said that the company constructing slaughter-house has even deceived the Government. The Administration has done its job honestly; but the slaughter house has come up due to pressurization tactics used by politicians. There was a need to take prompt action against the slaughter-house by demolishing the same.
District Administration issues notice to slaughter-house under Section 45 !
The District Administration took note of agitation against Morba slaughter-house issuing a notice to this slaughter-house under Section 45; but this notice was not accepted; therefore, the Regional officer stuck its copy on the wall of slaughter-house doing ‘Panchanama’. The slaughter-house will have to present its side by 18th February.
Courtesy: HJS.
Labels:
India
Free within days, the extremist plotting UK Mumbai-style attack: Fanatic who attended training camp with July 21 bombers will have controls lifted to protect human rights
- Unnamed plotter was put under a Terrorism Prevention Investigation Measure which includes a tag and strict curfew for the public's protection
- Order will be lifted under new rules to protect terror suspects' human rights
- Security Services say there's 'a real risk' he will seek to revive his plans to undertake attacks in the UK once the order is revoked
An Islamist fanatic will be freed from anti-terror controls within days despite being ‘determined’ to carry out a Mumbai-style attack in Britain.
The extremist attended a terror training camp in Cumbria with four of the five attempted suicide bombers involved in the London attacks of July 21, 2005.
He repeatedly tried to buy guns in what was suspected as a plot to carry out a mass-casualty attack in the UK, and has also travelled to Syria for ‘training’.
The plotter, known only as ‘CD’, was put under a Terrorism Prevention Investigation Measure (T-PIM) – including a tag and strict curfew – to protect the public in January 2012.
Security services believe the unnamed Islamic
fanatic will revive his plans to carry out an attack in the UK similar
to the one in the Chatrapathi Sivaji railway station in Mumbai in 2012
He has a number of associates in London ‘in connection with the attempted purchase of firearms’ and officials say that he would be able to quickly buy weapons.
But the order will be lifted on Sunday under rules introduced to protect the ‘human rights’ of terror suspects.
This is despite a judge ruling that the man has been trained in terrorism and that his ‘views and determination are unchanged’.
CD is one of six fanatics who are due to be released from their T-PIMS by the end of this month.
by blowing up seven transatlantic planes. Experts estimate the total bill for MI5 and the police to keep tabs on the six suspects once their T-PIM restrictions are lifted could reach £20million a year.
The cases will be raised in the Commons today by Labour’s shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper.
She has attacked her Tory counterpart, Theresa May, for axing Labour’s control order regime and replacing it with the weaker T-PIMS.
Miss Cooper said: ‘Her decision to weaken terror controls means suspects described by the courts as highly dangerous only a year ago will now face no restrictions.’
Home Office officials insist that, to comply with Labour’s Human Rights Act, there was no option but to weaken the rules.
Under the old control order regime, there was no fixed time limit on how long a suspect could be monitored.
But the orders were repeatedly challenged in the courts under the Human Rights Act, with terror suspects claiming their right to liberty, a fair trial and a family life had been infringed. These cases led to the introduction of T-PIMS, which have a two-year time limit.
Believing that a terror suspect remains determined to carry out an attack in the UK is not sufficient for an order to be renewed after two years. There must be new evidence.
Labour, which has obtained new court papers relating to the threat posed by CD and his fellow fanatics, said the T-PIMS regime had left ministers with their hands tied.
The court papers on CD, who is guaranteed lifelong anonymity to protect his rights, show he was identified by the Security Service as a leading figure in a network of Islamist extremists based in London.
In 2004, he attended meetings organised by the jailed fanatic Mohammed Hamid and has attended at least one of Hamid’s terrorist training camps in Cumbria.
In 2006, he had extremist training in Syria before returning to London in 2009, where he was ‘involved in planning a terrorist attack on the UK, probably involving firearms’.
When his T-PIM was renewed a year ago, the judge said: ‘There remains a network. His views and determination are unchanged.’ In November 2008, Islamic terrorists killed 164 people in 12 co-ordinated shooting and bombing attacks across Mumbai, India’s biggest city.
Last night, Security Minister James Brokenshire said: ‘The police and Security Service have been working for some time to put tailored plans in place to manage the risk posed by these individuals once their T-PIM restrictions are removed.’
18 dead in blast targeting pilgrims' buses in Mastung
Luggage (foreground) of pilgrims who
were traveling in the bus (background) before being attacked near
Mastung. PHOTO: BANARAS KHAN/EXPRESS
A suicide blast tore through two pilgrims’ buses on Tuesday evening near Dareen Garh area of Mastung, Balochistan, killing at least 18 and injuring over 40, reported Express News.
The two buses were part of a convoy carrying 103 pilgrims, including women and children, who were returning from Iran.
Police officer Faran Ali told The Express Tribune that at least 12 dead bodies and 13 injured were shifted to Quetta from Mastung. Ambulances were sent from Quetta to retrieve the dead bodies and injured and transferred to the Combined Military Hospital (CMH).
“I saw at least ten dead bodies and many injured lying in a pool of blood. The bus caught fire after the explosion,” said Arif, who sustained injuries in the attack.
Severe firing is reported to have taken place following the blast. Soon after the blast, security officials cordoned off the area.
An official of the bomb disposal squad confirmed that it was a suicide bomb attack.
“We have declared state of emergency at CMH, Provincial Sandeman Hospital and Bolan Medical Complex Teaching Hospital (BMC),” DIG police Quetta Mohammed Jaffar said.
A bomb disposal squad has also been summoned at the spot.
Majlis Wahdat-e-Muslimeen has declared three days of mourning for the victims of the blast.
Earlier, on January 1, a bomb blast targeted a passenger bus carrying Shia pilgrims from Taftan, a town in Balochistan bordering with Iran.
The blast had killed two people and left 31 injured.
Similarly, in October 2013, A car bomb hit a Frontier Corps (FC) van escorting a bus of Shia pilgrims in Dringarh, Mastung, killing two soldiers.
Frontier Corps and Balochistan Levies convoys were escorting five passenger buses of Shia pilgrims on the highway when they found a suspected car parked on the road.
“The buses were stopped from proceeding and two FC personnel got off and went near to search the car. As they got closer to the car, a huge explosion took place killing both on the spot,” Assistant Commissioner Mastung Shafqat Anwar told The Express Tribune.
After increasing number of attacks on Shia pilgrims, security on Quetta-Taftan highway was beefed up and the buses carrying Shia pilgrims were escorted by FC and Balochistan Levies personnel.
A large number of Shia pilgrims go to Iran to visit the sacred places through Quetta and most of them travel on passenger buses. Balochistan provincial government held a high level meeting to devise a security plan ahead of Muharam to foil any possible terrorism attempts in Quetta and national highways.
Pope tweets backing for huge US anti-abortion rally
Pope Francis has used Twitter to back an annual anti-abortion rally, the March for Life, which is
Pope
Francis is the head of the Catholic church and was named Time
Magazine's Person of the Year for 2013. - Reuters pic, January 22, 2014.expected to draw tens of thousands of activists to Washington on Wednesday.
"I join the March for Life in Washington with my prayers. May God help us respect all life, especially the most vulnerable," he said on his Twitter account in a message that was quickly re-tweeted thousands of times.
The Argentinian-born pontiff has some 11.5 million followers on his Twitter account in several languages, @pontifex.
The Washington rally is one of the key events of the pro-life movement in the United States, where abortion is one of the most polarising issues in politics.
Earlier this month, Francis called abortion "horrific", using some of the strongest language on the issue since his election last March.
Francis alarmed some conservatives last September with comments in an interview with a Jesuit magazine suggesting the Church should shake off an "obsession" with such divisive issues as abortion, contraception and homosexuality. - Reuters, January 22, 2014.
"I join the March for Life in Washington with my prayers. May God help us respect all life, especially the most vulnerable," he said on his Twitter account in a message that was quickly re-tweeted thousands of times.
The Argentinian-born pontiff has some 11.5 million followers on his Twitter account in several languages, @pontifex.
The Washington rally is one of the key events of the pro-life movement in the United States, where abortion is one of the most polarising issues in politics.
Earlier this month, Francis called abortion "horrific", using some of the strongest language on the issue since his election last March.
Francis alarmed some conservatives last September with comments in an interview with a Jesuit magazine suggesting the Church should shake off an "obsession" with such divisive issues as abortion, contraception and homosexuality. - Reuters, January 22, 2014.
New Beverly Hills attraction - 'Riza Villa'
This is an 11,500 sq ft mansion overlooking West Hollywood, sold to him for US$17.5 million (RM58.21 million) in September 2010.
The area is popular with star-gazing tourists in tour buses because of its high density of celebrity residents.
Sarawak Report said it visited the site to find that the original mansion has been demolished and that a new one is being built, complete with what looks to be a "very large" swimming pool being dug in the front yard.
The report states that the mansion is registered to a company named 912 North Hillcrest Road (BH) LLC in Delaware.
"However, the company which performs a private business and wealth management role for Mr Aziz - Nigro Karlin Segal Feldstein & Boino - confirmed the property is his," it reads.
Sarawak Report said Riza is currently staying in the penthouse of one of Hollywood's priciest apartment blocks.
"We visited the brand new, plush building, which advertises itself as Hollywood’s most sought- after address,” reads the report.
"The apartments come with full concierge service and expensive cars are lined up by the valet service outside.”
Source of funds
Sarawak Report had earlier questioned how Riza, who had a six-year stint as a banker in London before embarking in a movie-making career, could afford such luxuries and fund expensive movies.
Red Granite's lawyers have threatened to take legal action against Sarawak Report for allegedly insinuating that the film was funded through dubious means.
In an interview with Hollywood Reporter, Aziz said he had taken a break from banking in 2008 and travelled the world before becoming involved in showbiz.
He also said he has invested money in Red Granite and that he is backed by a group of investors "mainly from the Middle East and Asia".
Labels:
Rosmah
Mother refused child custody
A single mother of five claims welfare home Ti-Ratana in Desa Petaling, refuse to return her two biological daughters back.
Kuala Lumpur: A single mother of five cries foul and claims that welfare home Ti-Ratana in Desa Petaling is refusing to return her two biological daughters back into her custody.
Beramalah Devi, 40, in a press conference held at the KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (KLSCAH) today, said that she had made numerous attempts to reclaim her daughters from the welfare home.
Beramalah had left her daughters to the welfare home’s care in 2010, after her husband Tan Kok Cheong passed away and she was financially incapable of raising the two girls, Tham Ee Ching, 15 and Tham Yee Leng, 9 on her own.
After getting a better job and becoming financially stable, she approached the welfare home in Dec 2013 seeking custody. However, Ti-Ratana refused to allow her daughters to be with her, she alleged.
According to Beramalah’s lawyer M Visvanathan, she had lodged seven police reports against the welfare home but to date no action has been taken by the police authorities.
On Jan 20, a demand letter had been given to the welfare home demanding they release Beramalah’s daughters to her within 24 hours.
“I find the way Ti-Ratana is holding onto the children as unlawful and they must be returned back to the mother without any further delay,” said Visvanathan.
Visvanathan expressed his disappointment that a home being run based on Buddhist principles could be involved in such an act.
Beramalah claims that her two daughters have not been sent to school since beginning of the year and on January 21, she received a warning letter from the school regarding her daughter’s absence records.
Meanwhile when FMT contacted Ti-Ratana, it’s spokesperson Kelvin Ooi said that the matter had been referred to their lawyer and necessary steps have been taken.
An attempt to check with Ti-Ratana’s lawyer who declined to be named, refused to comment.
Malaysian Tamil Today, national secretary K Gunasekaran spoke to FMT after the press conference and advised that Beramalah be taken to meet with the respective police district chiefs for their views on the matter and to seek police co-operation on the seven police reports made earlier.
Beramalah Devi, 40, in a press conference held at the KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (KLSCAH) today, said that she had made numerous attempts to reclaim her daughters from the welfare home.
Beramalah had left her daughters to the welfare home’s care in 2010, after her husband Tan Kok Cheong passed away and she was financially incapable of raising the two girls, Tham Ee Ching, 15 and Tham Yee Leng, 9 on her own.
After getting a better job and becoming financially stable, she approached the welfare home in Dec 2013 seeking custody. However, Ti-Ratana refused to allow her daughters to be with her, she alleged.
According to Beramalah’s lawyer M Visvanathan, she had lodged seven police reports against the welfare home but to date no action has been taken by the police authorities.
On Jan 20, a demand letter had been given to the welfare home demanding they release Beramalah’s daughters to her within 24 hours.
“I find the way Ti-Ratana is holding onto the children as unlawful and they must be returned back to the mother without any further delay,” said Visvanathan.
Visvanathan expressed his disappointment that a home being run based on Buddhist principles could be involved in such an act.
Beramalah claims that her two daughters have not been sent to school since beginning of the year and on January 21, she received a warning letter from the school regarding her daughter’s absence records.
Meanwhile when FMT contacted Ti-Ratana, it’s spokesperson Kelvin Ooi said that the matter had been referred to their lawyer and necessary steps have been taken.
An attempt to check with Ti-Ratana’s lawyer who declined to be named, refused to comment.
Malaysian Tamil Today, national secretary K Gunasekaran spoke to FMT after the press conference and advised that Beramalah be taken to meet with the respective police district chiefs for their views on the matter and to seek police co-operation on the seven police reports made earlier.
Labels:
Malaysian Indians,
Women
Pakistani cleric slams “ignorant” Allah ruling
Pakistani Muslim cleric Younos AlGohar says the Court of Appeal ruling on the use of 'Allah' by non-Muslims implies that there is another creator.
PETALING JAYA: A Pakistani Muslim cleric Younos AlGohar said the Malaysian Appeals Court decision that the word ‘Allah’ is exclusively for Muslims, is syirik.
“The Malaysian court said, don’t use the word Allah. It is our God. Use your God’s name. This sentence is syirik,” said Younos, the co-founder of Messiah Foundation International in a 16:12 minute video recording by Alra TV.
“When you say this, you mean you believe that there is another God? Can you understand how ignorant and short sighted they are?
“It is deplorable and condemnable,” he said.
Younos who currently resides in Manchester, UK, gave his view of the Court of Appeal judgment prohibiting Catholic weekly, The Herald, from using the word Allah in reference to God in its Bahasa Malaysia section.
The decision was made in mid-October 2013 by three judges – Federal Court judge Mohamed Apandi Ali and Appeals Court judges Mohd Zawawi Salleh and Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim.
The unanimous decision was made by them on the grounds that the word Allah is not an integral part of the Malaysian Christian’s faith.
Zawawi said that usage of the word Allah would only serve to confuse the Christians as well as the Muslims due to the Trinity concept practiced in Christianity.
The judge had also said that Christian Bibles in the Indonesian, Middle Eastern and Malay languages had erred by using Allah when referring to God in the Bible.
Younos however said that the judgment only served to show that “Muslims today do not have any understanding of the Quran”.
“It is so clear that the word Allah can be used by any human being just because everyone is the creation of Allah.
“There is no other creator. So why must you ban people of other religion from using God’s name?” he said.
He criticised the three judges and the authorities as being “highly ignorant, shortsighted and prejudiced.”
Wrong mentality
In November 2013, Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah decreed that ‘Allah’ could not be used by non-Muslims in the state.
Recently, various states have also started to enforce respective state enactments barring non-Muslims from using ‘Allah’ and a list of other Arabic words deemed to be Islamic.
This led to more than 300 translated Malay and Iban bibles being seized by the Selangor Religious Department (Jais) from the Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM) premises on Jan 2, 2014.
Younos said the judgment is a form of “tyranny” and represents the wrong mentality of Muslims worldwide.
He added that the perception of some Muslims that Allah is equivalent to the Muslim god is untrue.
“Putting limitations on God to be God for Muslims is wrong.
“Arabic is not the Islamic language. Some people who are ignorant think that it is the language of paradise,” said the cleric.
He explained that the reason the Quran was revealed in Arabic was because it was the language that Prophet Muhammad understood.
“Allah is referred to as God to all mankind. This is personified in the term ‘Rabb al-Amin’ instead of Rabb al-Muslimin (God to Muslims),” he explained.
Not the first to condemn the judgment, Younos is joined by others, including the American Muslim theologian Reza Aslan who described the Malaysian court judgment as “a tragedy”.
An appeal has been filed against this judgment and the Federal Court is scheduled to hear the leave application next month.
“The Malaysian court said, don’t use the word Allah. It is our God. Use your God’s name. This sentence is syirik,” said Younos, the co-founder of Messiah Foundation International in a 16:12 minute video recording by Alra TV.
“When you say this, you mean you believe that there is another God? Can you understand how ignorant and short sighted they are?
“It is deplorable and condemnable,” he said.
Younos who currently resides in Manchester, UK, gave his view of the Court of Appeal judgment prohibiting Catholic weekly, The Herald, from using the word Allah in reference to God in its Bahasa Malaysia section.
The decision was made in mid-October 2013 by three judges – Federal Court judge Mohamed Apandi Ali and Appeals Court judges Mohd Zawawi Salleh and Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim.
The unanimous decision was made by them on the grounds that the word Allah is not an integral part of the Malaysian Christian’s faith.
Zawawi said that usage of the word Allah would only serve to confuse the Christians as well as the Muslims due to the Trinity concept practiced in Christianity.
The judge had also said that Christian Bibles in the Indonesian, Middle Eastern and Malay languages had erred by using Allah when referring to God in the Bible.
Younos however said that the judgment only served to show that “Muslims today do not have any understanding of the Quran”.
“It is so clear that the word Allah can be used by any human being just because everyone is the creation of Allah.
“There is no other creator. So why must you ban people of other religion from using God’s name?” he said.
He criticised the three judges and the authorities as being “highly ignorant, shortsighted and prejudiced.”
Wrong mentality
In November 2013, Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah decreed that ‘Allah’ could not be used by non-Muslims in the state.
Recently, various states have also started to enforce respective state enactments barring non-Muslims from using ‘Allah’ and a list of other Arabic words deemed to be Islamic.
This led to more than 300 translated Malay and Iban bibles being seized by the Selangor Religious Department (Jais) from the Bible Society of Malaysia (BSM) premises on Jan 2, 2014.
Younos said the judgment is a form of “tyranny” and represents the wrong mentality of Muslims worldwide.
He added that the perception of some Muslims that Allah is equivalent to the Muslim god is untrue.
“Putting limitations on God to be God for Muslims is wrong.
“Arabic is not the Islamic language. Some people who are ignorant think that it is the language of paradise,” said the cleric.
He explained that the reason the Quran was revealed in Arabic was because it was the language that Prophet Muhammad understood.
“Allah is referred to as God to all mankind. This is personified in the term ‘Rabb al-Amin’ instead of Rabb al-Muslimin (God to Muslims),” he explained.
Not the first to condemn the judgment, Younos is joined by others, including the American Muslim theologian Reza Aslan who described the Malaysian court judgment as “a tragedy”.
An appeal has been filed against this judgment and the Federal Court is scheduled to hear the leave application next month.
Labels:
Allah issue
MCA ready to prosecute Umno man
MCA Youth questions the delay by the AG in prosecuting the assailant who had punched the Deputy Education Minister.
UPDATED
PETALING JAYA: The MCA Youth’s legal bureau today expressed regret over the delay by the Attorney-General’s Chamber in prosecuting the assailant of Deputy Education Minister P Kamalanathan, and said the bureau was willing to do the job on behalf of the AG’s Chambers.
The bureau chief Choo Wei Sern said in a statement today that it has been almost a week since the Selangor police chief Mohd Shukri Dahlan said the police has submitted the investigation papers on the incident to the AG’s Chambers, but to no avail.
In the Jan 12 incident, a teacher who was also the Hulu Selangor Umno Youth official, threw a punch at Kamalanathan during an event in Bukit Beruntung. The Umno official was believed to be dissatisfied with the deputy minister as his request to transfer his relative to Selangor was ignored.
“The AG’s Chambers ought to realise that justice delayed is justice denied.
“More so, in a high profile case like this which involves a deputy minister, the delay by AG’s Chambers will seriously impede public confidence in the AG’s Chambers.
“The chambers is seen to be deliberately delaying taking any action or worse, refusing to take action against the suspect merely because of his political affiliation and background,” he said.
Choo said should the AG’s Chambers fail to act, then it might as well appoint MCA’s group of lawyers under the Criminal Procedure Code to act as prosecutors on a pro bono basis to ensure justice is upheld.
“We believe this is the right cause to fight for, and this must be the very same cause the attorney-general fights for and carry out,” he said.
MIC: Don’t put pressure on the AG Chambers
In a related development, MIC’s legal advisor Selva Mookiah said the AG Chambers should be allowed to undertake its duties without pressure or interference from any parties.
While he appreciated MCA’s concern on the matter, he nevertheless cautioned the Chinese-based party from turning the incident into a “us versus them” scenario.
“The due process of the law must be observed at all times. The AG Chambers will need to evaluate the investigation papers in accordance with their procedures.
“I am absolutely confident with the AG Chambers and its processes. At this juncture, it is MIC’s position that physical attack should never be condoned, no matter what the grievances are.
“We cannot allow mob rule and on the same token the alleged perpetrator should not be punished without a thorough investigation. Let the AG Chambers undertake its duties without pressure or interference,” he added in a statement.
UPDATED
The bureau chief Choo Wei Sern said in a statement today that it has been almost a week since the Selangor police chief Mohd Shukri Dahlan said the police has submitted the investigation papers on the incident to the AG’s Chambers, but to no avail.
In the Jan 12 incident, a teacher who was also the Hulu Selangor Umno Youth official, threw a punch at Kamalanathan during an event in Bukit Beruntung. The Umno official was believed to be dissatisfied with the deputy minister as his request to transfer his relative to Selangor was ignored.
“The AG’s Chambers ought to realise that justice delayed is justice denied.
“More so, in a high profile case like this which involves a deputy minister, the delay by AG’s Chambers will seriously impede public confidence in the AG’s Chambers.
“The chambers is seen to be deliberately delaying taking any action or worse, refusing to take action against the suspect merely because of his political affiliation and background,” he said.
Choo said should the AG’s Chambers fail to act, then it might as well appoint MCA’s group of lawyers under the Criminal Procedure Code to act as prosecutors on a pro bono basis to ensure justice is upheld.
“We believe this is the right cause to fight for, and this must be the very same cause the attorney-general fights for and carry out,” he said.
MIC: Don’t put pressure on the AG Chambers
In a related development, MIC’s legal advisor Selva Mookiah said the AG Chambers should be allowed to undertake its duties without pressure or interference from any parties.
While he appreciated MCA’s concern on the matter, he nevertheless cautioned the Chinese-based party from turning the incident into a “us versus them” scenario.
“The due process of the law must be observed at all times. The AG Chambers will need to evaluate the investigation papers in accordance with their procedures.
“I am absolutely confident with the AG Chambers and its processes. At this juncture, it is MIC’s position that physical attack should never be condoned, no matter what the grievances are.
“We cannot allow mob rule and on the same token the alleged perpetrator should not be punished without a thorough investigation. Let the AG Chambers undertake its duties without pressure or interference,” he added in a statement.
‘Don’t insult our King’
Umno and six NGOs lodge reports against Edmund Bon and a Facebook user for allegedly insulting the King.
KEPALA BATAS: The Umno division here and six other Malay organisations lodged seven police reports against lawyer Edmund Bon and a Facebook account holder for allegedly insulting the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and Malay rulers.
The complainants alleged that Bon and the unidentified administrator of Facebook page “Rejimen Anarki” had committed sedition by stating that non-Muslims were not bound by religious edicts (fatwa) issued by state rulers or the National Fatwa Council on issues concerning Islam.
Kepala Batas Umno division secretary Ahmad Darus, 44, led the NGOs in lodging the reports at 11am at the North Seberang Perai (SPU) district police station here.
The NGOs were Perkasa, Kelab Warisan (Keris), Malaysian Association for Youth Clubs (MAYC), Almuni 4B, SPU District Youth Council and Mimbar Permuafakatan Ibubapa Malaysia (Mapim) Penang.
They called on the police to investigate both Bon and the particular Facebook page administrator under the Sedition Act 1948 for instigating public hatred against Malay rulers.
They want the police to probe Bon’s intention in his press statement, which they had construed as disrespectful towards the King as the head of state as enshrined under the Federal Constitution.
“Police shall also probe to prevent any untoward incidents like racial tension and conflict,” said Ahmad.
Facebook user insulted Sultans

The complainants, with some 20 people, held a brief protest march outside the police station after lodging their reports.
They held placards which read: “Jangan Hina Raja Kami” (Don’t Insult Our King), “Kalimah Allah Hak Orang Islam” (The Word Allah Belongs To Muslims) and “Daulat Tuanku.”
Ahmad told newsmen later that statements issued by Bon and the Facebook page account holder incited Malaysians to hate and disrespect the King.
Bon had previously said that any fatwa by the religious councils does not apply to non-Muslims as it will violate their legal and religious right.
Ahmad alleged that Bon first released his press statement, which was subsequently posted in “Rejimen Anarki” Facebook page, on Jan 20.
A check on Facebook revealed that its administrator hailed from Skudai but is now residing in Senai, Johor.
Held for questioning
The administrator had posted a statement in his Facebook page today that he was picked up by the police at a restaurant and brought to a police station in Johor Bahru last night to record his statement.
At the police station, he said he was asked by the investigating officer on why he was so angry with the sultans.
“I said sultan is not god, sultan waste public money and live in luxury while lay public continue to live in poverty and being marginalised.
“Sultan sell people’s land while millions don’t have a home to live.
“Sultan receives VVIP and red carpet treatment, escorts, bodyguards etc for free while poor lay public continued to be marginalised, their land usurped, subsidies cut, their debts rising, mothers can’t buy milk for their children,” said the administrator in his posting.
He said the police then told him that “write down whatever is your dissatisfaction. After this, I don’t want to see your face again.”
The unknown administrator added in his posting that Article 10 of the Federal Constitution allowed freedom of speech and right to peaceful assembly in the country.
“People must realise that we have rights. Malaysia belongs to all of us, not to any individual or royal institution.
“If you were mistreated, you have to speak up. Is that wrong?” he asked in his posting.
The complainants alleged that Bon and the unidentified administrator of Facebook page “Rejimen Anarki” had committed sedition by stating that non-Muslims were not bound by religious edicts (fatwa) issued by state rulers or the National Fatwa Council on issues concerning Islam.
Kepala Batas Umno division secretary Ahmad Darus, 44, led the NGOs in lodging the reports at 11am at the North Seberang Perai (SPU) district police station here.
The NGOs were Perkasa, Kelab Warisan (Keris), Malaysian Association for Youth Clubs (MAYC), Almuni 4B, SPU District Youth Council and Mimbar Permuafakatan Ibubapa Malaysia (Mapim) Penang.
They called on the police to investigate both Bon and the particular Facebook page administrator under the Sedition Act 1948 for instigating public hatred against Malay rulers.
They want the police to probe Bon’s intention in his press statement, which they had construed as disrespectful towards the King as the head of state as enshrined under the Federal Constitution.
“Police shall also probe to prevent any untoward incidents like racial tension and conflict,” said Ahmad.
Facebook user insulted Sultans
The complainants, with some 20 people, held a brief protest march outside the police station after lodging their reports.
They held placards which read: “Jangan Hina Raja Kami” (Don’t Insult Our King), “Kalimah Allah Hak Orang Islam” (The Word Allah Belongs To Muslims) and “Daulat Tuanku.”
Ahmad told newsmen later that statements issued by Bon and the Facebook page account holder incited Malaysians to hate and disrespect the King.
Bon had previously said that any fatwa by the religious councils does not apply to non-Muslims as it will violate their legal and religious right.
Ahmad alleged that Bon first released his press statement, which was subsequently posted in “Rejimen Anarki” Facebook page, on Jan 20.
A check on Facebook revealed that its administrator hailed from Skudai but is now residing in Senai, Johor.
Held for questioning
The administrator had posted a statement in his Facebook page today that he was picked up by the police at a restaurant and brought to a police station in Johor Bahru last night to record his statement.
At the police station, he said he was asked by the investigating officer on why he was so angry with the sultans.
“I said sultan is not god, sultan waste public money and live in luxury while lay public continue to live in poverty and being marginalised.
“Sultan sell people’s land while millions don’t have a home to live.
“Sultan receives VVIP and red carpet treatment, escorts, bodyguards etc for free while poor lay public continued to be marginalised, their land usurped, subsidies cut, their debts rising, mothers can’t buy milk for their children,” said the administrator in his posting.
He said the police then told him that “write down whatever is your dissatisfaction. After this, I don’t want to see your face again.”
The unknown administrator added in his posting that Article 10 of the Federal Constitution allowed freedom of speech and right to peaceful assembly in the country.
“People must realise that we have rights. Malaysia belongs to all of us, not to any individual or royal institution.
“If you were mistreated, you have to speak up. Is that wrong?” he asked in his posting.
Labels:
Rulers of Malaysia,
umno
Agong is not the head of Islam, says constitutional law expert
Malaysia has no head of Islam and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is only the head of religion in his own home state and in states without rulers, said a constitutional law expert.
Former International Islamic University Malaysia academic Dr Abdul Aziz Bari (pic) said the more appropriate platform to represent the rulers on religious issues is the Conference of Rulers.
“It appears that not all the rulers view the way of the Agong and the Sultan of Selangor,” Abdul Aziz said in a statement.
As such, he said the statement made by the Agong on the “Allah” issue last week had no effect.
“It may not even bind the Muslims as the resolution made by the National Fatwa Council in 1986, which was cited by the Agong in his address, has no legal standing,” he said.
On Sunday, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah had stated that several Arabic words, including “Allah”, were exclusive to Muslims.
The Agong, who is also the Kedah Sultan, cited a 1986 decree by the National Fatwa Council which prohibits non-Muslims from using the words.
In November, the Sultan of Selangor also said that non-Muslims in his state could not use the word.
The Agong is appointed on a five-year rotational basis among the nine Malay rulers and is head of the religion of his state, Sabah, Sarawak, Penang, Malacca and the Federal Territories.
Abdul Aziz said the rulers, despite being the head of religion, had no power to lay down the laws of Islam.
“Only the Holy Prophet has the power to do so. Even the companions and later the caliphs had no such power. The position of the rulers is inferior to that of the caliphs.
“In any case, only the laws of Islam that is contained in the constitution and the relevant legislation can be enforced,” he said.
Abdul Aziz also said the Agong’s statement was not quite in line with the 10-point solution agreed by the Federal Government in 2011.
The 10-point solution which was endorsed by the cabinet, among others, allowed Christians nationwide to use the AlKitab in their religious practices.
“The rulers have no effect on non-Muslims as the right to religious freedom is guaranteed in the Federal Constitution. No authority can tell non-Muslims how they should practise their religion.
“Even for the Muslims, it is for the religion itself to regulate how they should practise Islam,” he said.
He said the statement on the “Allah” issue may not even bind the Muslims as there was is no clear basis for it.
“In fact, some religious scholars such as Shaykh Yusuf al-Qaradawy had stated that it was fine for non-Muslims to use the name.”
Abdul Aziz said the Agong, in his performance of the religous functions, may not listen to the advice of Putrajaya and was this was in line with the way the Constitution stipulated how the rulers function as head of religion.
He said the duty to abide by the government's advice under Article 40 (1) of the Constitution is a general requirement.
"I do not think this includes the Agong's religious functions," he said.
Negeri Sembilan Yang di-Pertuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, at his investiture ceremony in conjunction with his 66th birthday last week, urged Malaysian Muslims to respect each individual’s religion to avoid disharmony.
“In a Malaysian context, the Constitution has set Islam as the official religion of the country without hindering others to practise their own religions," Tuanku Muhriz had said.
“With that, I urge Malaysian Muslims to continue living in harmony with each other and ensuring respect is given to others who practise different religions.”
Tuanku Muhriz also called on leaders of every community to cast aside sentiments which can destroy the harmony the country is thriving in.
Abdul Aziz said that not many people knew that the White Paper which accompanied the Merdeka Constitution final draft stated that Jakim (Department of Islamic Development Malaysia) should be put under the Conference of Rulers.
"Now Jakim is being put as a unit under the Prime Minister's Department which I think is quite wrong," he said. – January 22, 2014.
Labels:
Federal Cons,
Rulers of Malaysia
Bumi dealers to government: Keep auto APs
Spectators
take photos of a Porsche 918 Spyder during the North American
International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan January 15, 2014. — Reuters
pic
By Joseph Sipalan, The Malay Mail
Bumiputera car dealers have asked Putrajaya to help keep their businesses afloat by maintaining the Approved Permit (AP) system, even as the government grapples with growing expectations to liberalise the country’s automotive industry.
The Malaysian Association of Malay Vehicle Importers and Traders (Pekema) said Putrajaya’s continued indecision over the status of the AP system has heightened concerns among its members over how their livelihood would be affected.
“We hope the govenment will continue with the AP system. Maybe review it, but keep it going,” Pekema president Datuk Zainuddin Abd Rahman told The Malay Mail Online when contacted.
When launching the revised National Automotive Policy (NAP) 2014 on Monday, International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed said that the government has yet to come to a decision on the AP system, which allows permit holders to import cars, saying that a “thorough study” will be conducted after Chinese New Year.
Mustapa later denied that the government was “backtracking” on its decision to halt the AP policy — which is seen as largely benefiting a small section of the Bumiputera community — saying that Putrajaya had found the issue to be more “complicated” than it initially thought.
“We talk to AP people, they also crave employment, participation. We talk to other people, they talk about level playing field,” he said during a question and answer session with the media after unveiling the NAP 2014.
“For the moment, the AP policy remains, which is termination by 2015,” he said earlier.
When the NAP was reviewed in 2009, it was stated that open APs would be terminated by December 31, 2015, while franchise APs would be terminated by December 31, 2020.
Zainuddin said the NAP 2014’s focus on energy efficient vehicles (EEV) is a good move to deal with the rising cost of fossil fuels, but stressed that the government needs to work on reducing excise duties if local players are to remain competitive.
He said that overall car prices will continue to fall in the country, but those in the import business will be hard-pressed to match the lower prices if excise duties remain high.
“At the moment, prices (of imported cars) are a bit high due to the duties. We have asked MoF (Minsitry of FInance) to consider reducing import tax and excise duties.
“For new cars, the import duty is less now, so they should bring dow the used car duties also. The majority of dealers will die if the price remains… what about our cars?” Zainuddin said.
Mustapa had said in the NAP unveiling that the government will not slash excise duties for vehicles as yet, as it accounts for 75 per cent of its total tax collection for vehicles.
He noted, however, that Putrajaya could consider trimming the duties – which have been blamed for high car prices – if the country’s fiscal position is strong enough in the next few years.
The AP system was introduced as an extension of the New Economic Policy, an affirmative action policy that was implemented in 1970 to deal with the income disparity between the majority Malays and the economically strong Chinese community.
Bumiputera dealers hold the lion’s share of APs issued by the government, with open APs typically used to import used cars while franchise APs deal with new vehicles.
Yesterday, PKR lashed out at Putrajaya’s refusal to remove the AP system, saying that the government would not have to backtrack on the scheduled removal of the system if they had done a proper in-depth study beforehand.
”We are also disappointed with the recent flip-flop by BN to maintain the AP system on the excuse that more studies are needed.
”This is no more than an excuse to allow certain groups who are close to BN to gain ridiculous profits when the public continue to be burdened by high car prices,” PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli and Selangor state assembly deputy Speaker Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad said in a joint statement.
Labels:
AP
Why the stir over kangkung?
Things are being blown out of proportion over the issue with some viewing it through race-tinted glasses. Are they blind to the fact that the people who are annoyed at the kangkung remark are from all ethnic groups?
I DON’T like water morning glory a.k.a water spinach a.k.a kangkung. There’s a metallic tang to it that I find displeasing.
I much prefer kailan or bayam – the former fried with salted fish and the latter in a watery soup.
What has my taste in vegetables got to do with anything? Nothing really.
Just as the recent, rather humorous, jabs at the Prime Minister have nothing to do with his ethnicity.
It has plenty to do with his alleged insensitivity to the price hikes in the country (which affect every single Tan, Din and Harvin) and it has plenty to do with the fact that kangkung is funny (even its very name makes me giggle); but I can’t see where the Prime Minister’s ethnicity comes into play.
So, how is it racist?
I guess some people view the world through race-tinted glasses.
These are the people who are calling for a demonstration to defend the Prime Minister.
I must say their poster calling for participants in this demonstration looks very exciting.
It has a very macho-looking chap carrying not one but two parang and an equally macho call for all Malays to come out and defend their race, their king, their religion and who knows what else.
I am of course in favour of demonstrations and public protests; it is after all a fundamental right as guaranteed by Article 10 of the Constitution. But Article 10 also says, and rightly so, that any assembly must be peaceful and without arms.
This “Defend the PM” demonstration uses a poster with a chap carrying machetes. Aren’t machetes weapons? Are they asking people to bring their parang? Or is it just for dramatic artistic effect?
I am sure they will have a good explanation and surely the police should ask for it.
The Government has shown itself to be very sensitive to any symbols of violence. After all, the Registrar of Societies made a huge hue and cry about the fact that Parti Sosialis Malaysia used a closed fist for its party symbol.
A closed fist is violent, apparently. It conjures up images of pugilism, I guess.
But if a closed fist is violent, then isn’t a parang even more violent? Thus, I would be most surprised if the police do not swoop down on these organisers with the same vigour and energy that they use when swooping down on the organisers of other demonstrations.
For example, the anti-price-hike demo on New Year’s Eve was scrutinised and demonised by the cops because it was thought to be potentially dangerous.
The police even feared that there were going to be grenades in Merdeka Square.
The organisers did not say “bring grenades” and their posters did not have grenades on them but the cops wanted to be safe rather than sorry I suppose.
Therefore, I would expect nothing less from our men and women in blue than a complete and thorough investigation of people who actually have a weapon-wielding man on their invitation to a demo.
Especially in the light of several folks (again wearing those special spectacles) saying that this kangkung issue could lead to race riots.
Race riots? Because people are angry at price rises?
Are these people blind to the fact that the people who are annoyed at the kangkung remark are from all ethnic groups?
There is no racial issue here. The only racial issues are the ones being made up by the desperate people whose only pathetic claim to relevance depends on them making everything into a racial issue.
I don’t believe that Malaysians are going to fall for this idiocy. But having said that, a few may not care about reason and logic and all it takes is a handful to create trouble.
Surely a government maintaining the peace would seek these true trouble-makers out. Or do different rules apply? We’ll just have to wait and see.
> Azmi Sharom (azmisharom@yahoo.co.uk) is a law teacher. The views expressed are entirely the writer’s own.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
