Share |

Tuesday, 6 April 2010

PKR S’gor M.B grants 108 Chinese ex mine workers land. Zero land for estate workers.

PKR S’gor M.B grants 108 Chinese ex mine workers land. Zero land for estate workers.

PKR Selangor Menteri Besar grants land to 108 ex Southern Kinta Consolidate Bernam (Chinese) mining workers at Hulu Selangor (Sinar Harian 4/4/2010 at page N4). We are happy for the Chinese mine workers.

But for the thousands of Indian estate workers who had been promised houses under the Estate Workers Housing Scheme, PKR despite over two years of rule in Selangor has, yet to fulfill this promise. The other Indian housing settlements like Kg Bengali, Rawang being the clearest example has been denied freehold land titles. Race matters in PKR’s state policies. But otherwise PKR, DAP and PAS all preach multi-racialism and accuse Hindraf of having a racist agenda when they raise issues such as these. Why?

Because Indians are soft targets with no or very little political power. This very same Sinarharian two months ago reported a Hindu cemetery being demolished and the bones scattered all over. There is zero solution from Pakatan.

The only thing PKR wants from the Indians are their votes. PKR, DAP and PAS not interested in this and scores of the other Indian problems.

P. Uthayakumar

Click the image to enlarge
PKR Sgor

UMNO’s Hulu Selangor, MIC Mandore’s wayang kulit: curtain is up for PKR, DAP and PAS abandons IC & BC solving Secretariat at their State Secretariats.

url ulu selangor UMNO’s Hulu Selangor, MIC Mandore’s wayang kulit: curtain is up for PKR, DAP and PAS abandons IC & BC solving Secretariat at their State Secretariats.

The Sinar today (29/3/2010 at page S 25) carries the MIC Mandore’s 53 year old wayang kulit, supposedly dishing out Mykads’, welfare help and free clinics by the mobile National Registration Department, Welfare Department and the clinic. This wayang kulit drew 300 participants.

Only 10 Indians without Identity Cards were merely identified, let alone the same being solved. What about the estimated 150,000 Indian children nationwide who have been denied their birth certificates and another 300,000 of their parents who have similarly also been denied their Identity Cards cum Malaysian citizenship?

Critics from both sides of the political spectrum in UMNO for 50 long years repeatedly warned us about raising these “sensitive issues”.

And now the ex-17 year UMNO Opposition Leader joins the bandwagon but accuses Hindraf and HRP of their ‘racist’ agenda. Raising instances of injustices and discrimination is considered ‘racism’?

Malaysia is about the only country in the world where the struggle against racism is deemed to be racist even by the supposed “multiracial” Anwar Ibrahim. A struggle for a place under the Malaysian sun is deemed racism by Anwar Ibrahim. But this very same Anwar Ibrahim has zero records of condemning UMNOs’ worst forms of racism because he would lose Malay votes.

Anwar Ibrahim, DAP, PKR and PAS could practice non racism but they won’t. For example he could for a start direct the PKR Selangor State government to open up a Birth Certificate and Identity Card solving Secretariat with one Director five Regional Heads of Department, Ten Managers, twenty supervisors and 100 staff within the State Secretariats in Selangor, Penang and Kedah and under the direct supervision of the Menteri Besars and Chief Minister with the view to solve this 53 year old problem created and allowed to compound by UMNO.

These state governments could undertake the task to liaise and if need be take the Federal UMNO government to court in seeing to it that the denying of BCs’ and ICs’ by UMNO is put to an end at least in these three P.R ruled states. This would in effect mean that about 40% of the 150,000 and 300,000 BC and IC problems could be solved. But Anwar Ibrahim his PKR, DAP and PAS would not undertake actions against these UMNOs’ injustices. Because the victims are merely the soft target Indians with no or very little political power.

So now who has the racist agenda, Anwar Ibrahim, PKR & DAP, or HRP and Hindraf?

Karunai Nithi @ Compassionate Justice
ulu selangor 2 ulu selangor 1

Hulu Selangor Hindu cemetery demolished at will but Chinese muslim and Christian cemetery preserved


Pray tell us of one Hindu cemetery that looks even remotely like in the photo above in The Star 5/4/2010 at page T 6 22.

Unlike the economically powerful Chinese, almost 90% of the Indians are in the poor, poor or low income group and thus they cannot afford to buy up land like for the Chinese cemeteries. Similarly the Christian Muslims cemeteries are almost as well maintained and preserved.

But when it comes to Hindu cemeteries, they are demolished at will. The latest being the Ladang Batu Pekaka Hindu cemetery by the PAS Kedah government. Similarly the PKR Selangor state government demolished the Hulu Selangor Hindu cemetery two months ago (posted herein) and SinarHarian reported that bones were found scattered around. Of course almost all of the Hindu cemeteries were historically given by the British for the Hindu communities use unlike for the muslim cemeteries these land for Hindu cemeteries were never alienated nor gazetted accordingly.

The duty and responsibility to maintain cemeteries in any country is with the local authorities and or the state governments. But only in Malay-sia the local authorities push the buck back to the Hindus to maintain their own cemeteries while the muslim cemeteries are maintained by the government or their agencies.

Even with the two over year rule of Kedah, Penang and Selangor all these Hindu cemeteries have still been denied state government land and refused to be maintained. These Hindu cemeteries are meant to be temporary by both UMNO/BN and also by the PKR/DAP and PAS. Where then is the change promised by PKR, DAP and PAS? As it stands it is clear that they only want the Indian votes and not Indians problems.

P. Uthayakumar

MIC Attack Dogs strike Business Consultant

Monday, April 05, 2010
A prominent Maika holding shareholders crusader, S Nadaraja, was pounded by MIC attack dogs yesterday at a meeting attended by Samy Vellu at Sungai Cho, Rawang.
Two Tamil dailies – Makkal Osai owned by Subramaniam and Tamil Nesan owned by Samy Vellu – provided entirely different version of the incident.

 maika
makkal osai


According to Makkal Osai Tamil daily, Nadaraja was savagely attacked when he questioned Samy Vellu on the status Maika Holdings.
“I’m a shareholder of Maika Holdings. The management is cheating the share holders by not having annual general meetings for the last three years. Samy Vellu is the founder and it is most appropriate to question him. That’s what I did”, Nadaraja apparently told Makkal Osai.
“Since 1984, Maika Holdings is in terrible state. They (Maika Management) don’t have the courtesy to explain to the share holders. Is it wrong to ask about my shares? When we ask, they come and whack us”, Nadaraja added.
Maika Holdings was an investment arm of Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) started two decades ago, collecting money from impoverished plantation workers, with the hope of increasing Indian equity in Malaysia but the founder Samy Vellu, President of MIC and his son Vell Paari siphoned the bulk of the wealth and also hijacked lucrative projects offered by the government leaving the poor plantation workers further impoverished.
This was not the first time business consultant Nadaraja having an encounter with Samy Vellu.
Samy Vellu’s mouthpiece Tamil Nesan on the contrary branded Nadaraja as a rabble-rouser who often creates commotions at Maika AGMs.
The daily said, Nadaraja tried to attack their photographer and also used vulgar words that provoked Samy Vellu supporters to respond.
According to a source, former senator Ravichandran led the confrontation. Soon he will be rewarded with some other appointments.
Using violence against Samy Vellu Opponents is not new in MIC.  Many MIC members do that to please Samy Vellu who will not fail to reward them.
Deputy Minister Saravanan, former youth chief Vickneswaran and current youth chief Mohan Thangarasu are in that category.

 maika
Only, a week ago, Central Working Committee member K P Samy was confronted by Samy Vellu’s henchman Tharmalingam, former Portklang Authority (LPK) forklift driver, at Klang MIC divisional meeting.
This henchman Tharmalingam is a board member of Portklang Authority.
Meanwhile, sources said, Nadaraja filed a police report.
 maika

 maika

 maika

Scant details in new tender portal raise questions

By Lee Wei Lian - The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, April 5 — Less than a week after its launch, the government’s new MyProcurement tender portal has come under criticism for its lack of details which makes it difficult for the public to justify some of the tenders that have been awarded.

One of the tenders is a contract to build a RM78 million hostel in Terengganu for 200 students that was awarded to Rafa Sepakat Sdn Bhd, a number that has flabbergasted some industry players.

“It works out to be about RM390,000 per student and my first impression is that you might as well buy each student a link house,” one developer told The Malaysian Insider. He spoke on condition of anonymity.

“But at least the government is brave enough to put the information out there for people to comment.”

He added that the most important thing is the specifications of the hostel — the size, whether there are canteens, swimming pools, libraries and so on.

“If it really works out to be RM390,000 per student, it must be absolutely luxurious,” he said. “But we need to know the specifications to judge. You can tell people you bought a car for one million but if you get a Mercedes S500, then it is ok. A normal hostel should typically cost only around RM50,000.”

Another developer told The Malaysian Insider that a hostel for 200 students should only cost about RM10 million.

The MyProcurement portal (myprocurement.treasury.gov.my) does not reveal detailed tender specifications, and this has already given rise to criticisms from the opposition.

Other tenders that could potentially raise questions are a RM6.5 billion deal to supply the army in Perlis, Kedah and Penang with food, and a RM42.9 million deal to supply lifeboats to the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency.

Without knowing how the number of soldiers that need to be fed and the unit cost of each lifeboat, it will be difficult for the government to justify the expense.

In comparison, the Singapore governemnt’s tender portal (www.gebiz.gov.sg) contains a short and long description, quantity, unit of measure, unit price and total award value, and names and numbers of key ministry contact people, all of which are missing from MyProcurement.

The Singapore portal also allows the public to drill down into the various tenders and quotations to find the address of the winning bidders — whether it is a contract to renovate a hostel or to provide instruments to the school orchestra.

DAP MP Tony Pua today questioned MyProcurement’s accuracy and told reporters in Parliament today that the MyProcurement Portal launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak last week severely lacked data “to make informed judgments with regards to a particular contract award.”

“While the value of (the RM6.5 billion) contract for food items would have certainly raised eyebrows, I’d like to believe that there are some decimal point errors involved,” said Pua.

Parliament Accounts Committee chairman Datuk Seri Azmi Khalid said that the objective of the portal is transparency and if it was not sufficiently apparent, the pubic should demand more transparency and clarifications.

“If it is still not transparent, then people should demand,” Azmi, who is also the Umno MP for Padang Besar, told The Malaysian Insider when contacted.

“Weaknesses should be improved. The government needs feedback and it is up to the public to make suggestions. The portal was put up by civil servants and sometimes they don’t see things from the public’s perspective,”

MyProcurement is part of the Najib administration’s effort to introduce greater transparency in government tenders as part of its efforts to reform the economy and make it more competitive.

“In line with the government’s aspiration to eradicate corruption, we made fighting corruption one of the National Key Result Areas (NKRA) through the Government Transformation Programme (GTP). Among the areas emphasised is the improvement of transparency and integrity in the government’s procurement process,” said Najib in his speech at the launch last week.

While some of hailed measures such as MyProcurement and say that it is a “good first step”, Pua criticised it saying that it has not gone far enough as the GTP roadmap called for all procurement contracts to be disclosed publicly, including directly negotiated contracts, which had not been adhered to.

“Therefore Datuk Seri Najib’s response towards publishing information of contracts which have been awarded without any tenders that they will not be made publicly available is most disappointing, and raises strong doubts as to whether he has the political will to carry out the necessary reforms to wipe out rent-seeking and patronage which is so entrenched in our government procurement system,” said Pua.

Matthias Chang admitted to Serdang Hospital

KUALA LUMPUR, April 5 — Matthias Chang (picture), who opted to go to jail rather than pay a fine for contempt of court, was admitted to the Serdang Hospital today after going on a hunger strike.

A spokesman at the hospital, when contacted by Bernama, said Chang was admitted to the emergency ward at 11.59am before being transferred to the normal ward at 1.12pm.

The former political secretary of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia’s fourth prime minister, was reported to have gone on a hunger strike after he was taken to the Kajang Prison to serve a month’s jail in default on April 1, following his refusal to pay the RM20,000 fine for the contempt offence.

According to a statement posted on Chang’s website on Saturday, Chang had stated that he would persist with his hunger strike until judge Noor Azian Shaari stopped her alleged biasness in her dealings with litigants, and the authorities involved agreed to review legislation concerning punishment for contempt of court (Order 52 of the Rules of the High Court 1980).

Chang, 60, was cited for contempt on March 25 when he refused to apologise after a spat with Noor Azian and a lawyer during cross-examination in his breach of contract and defamation suit against American Express (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd. — Bernama

Clarify laws on Orang Asli rights, govt urged

By Marc Jitab

KUALA LUMPUR: A lawyer has blasted the government for its lackadaisical attitude when it comes to respecting the rights of the Orang Asli. He said both the federal and state governments were guilty.

Anthony Augustine, who heads the Bar Council's Orang Asli Affairs Committee, said the government needed to set up a body of legal experts to tend to Orang Asli concerns or else their representation in court would remain poor.

He complained that laws were not being clarified to match what the courts had ruled on the question of native land rights.

He said: “The highest court in the country respects natives' land rights; so why can't the government?"

Augustine was the legal adviser to the Task Force on Orang Asli Land Rights under the now ousted Pakatan-led Perak government.

He said Perak had been at the forefront of Orang Asli protection ever since it passed the Orang Asli Protection Ordinance in 1939, the first such law enacted in Malaysia.

“When they enacted the National Land Code in 1965, they must surely have known about Act 134, the Aboriginal Peoples Act in 1954," he said.

“So again, the government did not catch up.

"The government says, 'We want to give you this land.' But the Orang Asli are saying, 'You cannot give us this land, because you can't give us something that is already ours. Just recognise our right over it.'”

'Case of failed integration'

Unity, it appears, has emboldened the Orang Asli of late. The different tribes once thought of themselves as separate from one another, but the common banner of "Orang Asli"' has done much to augment their voice.

Augustine said "the best thing" that had happened to the indigenous peoples was the decision to call themselves "Orang Asli" instead of each identifying only with his tribe.

With this in mind, they formed the Perak Orang Asli Village Network, and the idea has been adopted as well in Pahang, Negeri Sembilan, and Johor.

Citing the recent protest at the Prime Minister's office, Augustine said it was important to note that the Orang Asli had stood on a common ground to demand their rights, not only over land, but also education, health, infrastructure and employment.

“And this is very important," he said. "After 52 years, there is yet to be an Orang Asli who heads the Orang Asli Affairs Department and this is clearly a case of failed integration.

“It's not that they are incapable of doing so. They are able to coordinate themselves well, as we have seen in Putrajaya two weeks ago, as well as in all the Orang Asli NGOs that have sprung up all over the country.

“The Orang Asli do not have many issues between themselves. Their issues are with external forces. Therefore, external forces like civil society should empower them and bring out the focal point of their struggle, which are land rights, education and employment.

"Their cultural heritage and tradition must be given support to flourish.”

Battle continues: Subra flays 'desperate' Samy

By FMT Staff

FULL REPORT KUALA LUMPUR: The never ending feud between MIC president S Samy Vellu and S Subramaniam has resurfaced once again as the clock ticks down for the Hulu Selangor by-election.

The public spat comes at a crucial time, and could prove to be a detrimental factor in the by-election where MIC deputy president G Palanivel is expected to contest.

Palanivel, with the blessings of Samy Vellu, had defeated Subramaniam and another candidate S Sothinathan in the battle for MIC's number two post last year.

In a statement today, Subramaniam expressed anger over articles appearing in the Samy Vellu family-owned Tamil Nesan daily which implied that he and his supporters are undermining Palanivel's chances.

He said the articles, penned by anonymous writers, had a “sinister and ulterior political motive to sow the seeds of hatred and animosity among MIC and Barisan Nasional supporters”.

“These articles only go to show Samy Vellu’s desperate attempts in conspiring to find scapegoats and plausible reasons now itself in the event MIC is defeated in Hulu Selangor.

“Instead of using the by-election as an opportunity to unite the different factions in MIC to win the seat, Samy Vellu has created further animosity between supporters of MIC leaders, thereby damaging BN’s chances of securing a victory,” he said.

“He knows that a defeat or the failure of BN to secure Indian votes would only point to his failed leadership in MIC as he has lot of answering to do on the highly publicised scandals in Maika Holdings Bhd, MIED and Aimst University and on the attempts by some private individuals to hijack the prized assets of MIED.

“Despite all his failures and setbacks, Samy Vellu still wants to be the sole campaigner in Hulu Selangor on behalf of MIC and is clearly making a frantic attempt to save his leadership,” he added.

Subramaniam said the MIC president of three decades is worried that a possible defeat would accelerate his departure from MIC.

Two-pronged attack

According to the former MIC deputy president, Tamil Nesan had launched a two-pronged attack against him and his supporters.

“The first is that I am behind the moves which call for the Hulu Selangor seat not to be given to MIC or to Palanivel again.

“Everyone knows that these calls came from Umno and its leaders and the reasons cited by them clearly explain that MIC and its leadership are not in a strong position to win back the seat,” he said.

“These Umno leaders claim that a weak MIC, whose popularity among the Indian community is at its lowest today, is the reason why the seat should be given to Umno,” he added.

Subramaniam said by implicating him with the statements of Umno leaders, Tamil Nesan is insulting the intelligence and political wisdom of these Umno leaders.

“Even before the candidate is announced, is it necessary to start such a controversy on Palanivel in Hulu Selangor? Will it help the voters to support a BN candidate? Does Samy Vellu want to deny knowledge of this despicable act of Tamil Nesan which is in fact causing damage to BN’s chances in Hulu Selangor?” he asked.

Instigating independents

Secondly, Subramaniam said the daily also accused him of plotting Palanivel's defeat by instigating independent candidates to contest in the April 25 by-election.

The MIC leader said as of today, three individuals have publicly delcared their intention to join the fray as independent candidates.

One of them is former Hulu Selangor MIC division chief V Chandran, a former staunch ally of Palanivel, who was recently expelled from the party.

The second is Malaysian Indian Youth Council president A Rajaratnam while the third is T Ananthan, a former Tamil Nesan employee who failed to win a Central Working Committee (CWC) position in the last MIC elections.

Citing a recent interview, Subramaniam said both Chandran and Ananthan have declared that they want to “teach Samy Vellu a lesson”.

Subramaniam said Tamil Nesan had also implicated him in a report published today.

“While reporting about a ceramah by Samy Vellu in Hulu Selangor which was disrupted by one Maika Holdings shareholder S Nadarajah who raised the Maika Holdings issue, the paper took pains to link me with Nadarajah.

“People cannot be hoodwinked as everyone knows that Nadarajah has more than a 10-year history of feuds and court battles with Samy Vellu over the Maika Holdings issues,” he added.

Meanwhile, Subramaniam said the daily had also insinuated that he worked against Samy Vellu in the Sungai Siput constituency during the 2008 general election to engineer the defeat of the MIC president.

“I wish to point out here that when such insinuations and allegations on Sungai Siput appeared in Tamil Nesan a few months back, I had categorically denied them and filed a legal suit on this matter against Tamil Nesan which is pending hearing,” he added.

Constable: I saw Navindran hitting Kugan

PETALING JAYA: A constable told the Sessions Court here today that he witnessed accused constable V Navindran hitting car theft suspect A Kugan, who died while in police custody.

K James, 27, from the Subang Jaya police headquarters, who was then on duty guarding Kugan at the Taipan police station, said Navindran entered the interrogation room where the suspect was held after he and a colleague came out.

He said he was on duty from 4am to 8am on that day (Jan 16, 2009) and that Navindran had come to the station to be updated on the latest developments concerning the theft of luxury cars in which Kugan was alleged to be involved.

"Navindran came in at 7am. I then went out to get a drink at a nearby shop with my partner and assumed Navindran was on the 8am shift.

"When I came back, I headed back to the interrogation room and suddenly heard screams coming from inside it," he said.

James said he and his partner quickly rushed into the room and that was when they saw Navindran hitting Kugan.

"I tried to stop him by holding his hands and ordered him to get out of the room.

"Kugan whose hands were cuffed at the back was trying to avoid the blows by turning left and right," he said.

Asked by deputy public prosecutor Azlina Rasdi as to how Navindran hit Kugan, James said he noticed Navindran was holding a rubber hose when he tried to restrain the constable.

James, who is the prosecution's 15th witness, was testifying in the case of the death of Kugan in police custody on Jan 20, 2009.

Navindran, 28, had pleaded not guilty on Oct 1, 2009, to a charge of causing grievous hurt to Kugan, 23.

He is charged with committing the offence at the interrogation room of the Taipan police station, USJ, Subang Jaya, at 7am on Jan 16, 2009.

He has been charged under Section 331 of the Penal Code, which carries a jail term of 10 years and a fine upon conviction.

Navindran also pleaded not guilty to two alternative charges of causing hurt to Kugan at the same time and place under Section 330 of the Penal Code.

James, who is now attached to the Ampang Jaya police headquarters, further testified that he did not record in the station's diary as to what transpired on the grounds that Kugan did not make any complaints.

"I did ask him if he was okay and Kugan replied that he did not feel any pain or experienced any injury.

"We then told Kugan, who was dressed in lock-up clothes, to rest for a while after finding there were red marks at the back of his neck," he said.

When cross-examined by defence counsel Datuk P M Nagarajan, James told the court that he was not sure if he noticed Navindran bringing in the rubber hose into the interrogation room.

He also said Kugan did not experience any bleeding as result of the alleged assault.

The hearing before Judge Aslam Zainuddin continues tomorrow.

- Bernama

Najib, a tightrope he treads

By RK Anand - Free Malaysia Today


COMMENT A politician thinks of the next election, a statesman thinks of the next generation, said James Freeman Clarke.

Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who inherited a bruised and tattered coalition from his predecessor, has just celebrated his 365th day in office.

Even before he sat behind the desk that he was groomed for since his youth, Najib was haunted by the spectre of a beautiful woman, so brutally murdered.

Despite his repeated denials, swearing on the Quran, and the authorities finding no concerete links, the spectre refuses to be exorcised, no thanks to the opposition which never fails to remind the people not to forget that macabre episode.

Najib's reputation was dealt a blow, and no coffeeshop chatter about the premier is complete without mention of that lady who was blown up, and how the blood trail leading to Putrajaya was supposedly covered up.

Then again, the public has always been insatiable when it comes to conspiracy theories, no matter how far-fetched it might be.

A media muzzled by their political paymasters as well as a police force and judiciary perceived as being under the thumb of the government, ensure that more coal is shovelled into the furnace of speculation.

C4 explosives and seared flesh aside, Najib had, like his predecessor who promised to net the big fish swimming in the ocean of corruption, made many grand promises after taking oath of office.

Among them is to foster greater unity and a sense of oneness.

However, his critics claim that he has yet to make good on his words, apart from some cosmetic changes, a dab of lip gloss here, and a shade of mascara there.

Even his 1Malaysia brainchild is on the verge of becoming a victim of infanticide, with the opposition casting aspersions on who the real father is. According to Anwar Ibrahim, the DNA matches that of an US-company conceived, born in Israel, concept.

Soon after that, another onslaught was unleashed, with Najib's deputy finding himself trapped between a rock and a hard place with the challenge – race or nationality first?

Stuck in a difficult position

But this is not about whether Najib has delivered or not, but rather why it would be difficult for any individual in his shoes to walk the talk within the ambit of the existing political framework in Malaysia.

Lest we forget, a prime minister is also human, and like us, he too is ambitious and avaricious.

A prime minister is a man first. He does not descend from heaven, cast in a mould of all goodness. Just like the rest, he is susceptible to the very same desires and trappings of this material existence, the difference being that his shortcomings become public because of the public office he holds.

A prime minister is a politician second.

So he has to stratergise his moves carefully. For him each sunset heralds a new chess match, where the pieces have to be moved tactfully in order not to please one segment at the expense of peeving another. Simply put, he walks on a tightrope, balancing precariously between victory and defeat.

His vision pours forth through a pair of vote-tinted glasses. Every child kissed, every hand shook, every donation given and every event graced ultimately boils down to the ballot box.

In the Malaysian context, Najib is Umno president second.

This is indeed a difficult position to be in, when helming a multiracial nation. He is forced to play the role of a “political racist” in his party and a “political non-racist” elsewhere. He is constantly confronted with the problem of – do away with this, and risk raising the ire of one group, keep it in place, and incense another.

Throw religion into the equation, and the situation becomes dicier.

Like a ringmaster, Najib runs a collosal circus. He has to juggle the clowns, who provide comic relief at the expense of the coalition's credibility. The mighty elephants, which he must tame and make kneel at his command. And the lions, which grudgingly partake in the show and into whose jaws, he must insert his head.

In a world that is becoming increasingly globalised and borderless, the Barisan Nasional political structure remains entrenched in the dark ages, and politicians from its race-based parties are struggling to justify their existence.

As one wise man pointed out, racism in this country is institutionalised, constitutionalised, legalised and politicised to the point that it would take an herculean effort to reset the minds of her denizens.

And this is not only with the Malays, he noted. Have a Chinese or Indian prime minister, and the same thing would happen in reverse.

Simply because, no matter what Lim Kit Siang might thunder, for the majority of Malaysians it is still Malay, Chinese, Indian and whatnot first, and Malaysian second. (Not taking into account the sub-ethnic divisions within the ethnic divisions.)

Perkasa, boon or bane?

Imagine the likes of Perkasa, which some allege has been sub-contracted by Umno to tread where others fear to tread under the 1Malaysia sky, taking centrestage before a backdrop of towering skyscrapers, mammoth shopping malls, Formula One races and fancy nightclubs.

Malaysia, it seems, exists someplace between progressive and regressive. To quote the succint description of another wise man, it is a land with “First World infrastructure, Third World Mentality”.

Deviating a little, is Perkasa doing the Malays a service or disservice? Special privileges and NEP are the clarion calls of this pressure group.

But what pride is there in winning a rat race when the triumphant ones are given a headstart?

In the end, the system spawns generation after generation of rats who train to run a certain distance, while the rest train to run the entire length, giving the latter rodents a significant edge in the international circuit, while the former becomes complacent in the absence of true competition.

As noble as the intentions might be, the affirmative actions have only benefitted a few, while a sizeable portion of the Malay community still grapples with trying to make ends meet, a clear indication that the policy has been abused.

Perkasa should instead empower the Malays with the confidence that they can win the race on their own accord, and therefore work harder to discard the so-called “crutches”. They must be transformed into a race which realises that it is “special” not because of the letters in the constitution, but because of merits.

But such a scenario would not bode well for the politicians, for when the “crutches” are dumped into the bin, so would the leaders who provided them. And when the logic of politics is applied, it is easier to lord over those who limp than those who run.

Struggling to stay afloat

Rocked by the waves of such a complex and delicate political framework, Najib's 1Malaysia is struggling to remain afloat.

To his credit, Najib had recently proposed direct membership into BN in order to increase its multiracial composition, which must have left his component party leaders squirming uncomfortably in their seats.

It is a small step, but nevertheless one taken in the right direction and Najib should be lauded for this.

Anything bolder, and Najib runs the risk of stoking discontent in his party and coalition, ultimately paving the way for certain forces to bay for his blood. Some claim this is already happening.

For those who wish to see more radical reforms, do cut him some slack. He is after all, man first, Umno president second, prime minister third.

Happy anniversary and God Bless, Mr Prime Minister.

Ibrahim Ali: Gerakan parti tin kosong

Wong Shu Qi, Merdeka Review

Presiden Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (PERKASA), Ibrahim Ali menyifatkan Gerakan sebagai parti tin kosong, kerana tidak mempunyai perwakilan dalam parlimen, malah perlu bergantung kepada saluran perlantikan senator untuk masuk ke dewan parlimen.

Ibrahim Ali (gambar kiri) juga menuduh bahawa Gerakan heboh membuat kenyataan kontroversi untuk mengembalikan sokongan masyarakat Cina kepada dirinya.  Dari kaca mata ahli parlimen Pasir Mas yang "bebas" ini, Gerakan berbuat demikian demi kepentingan politik dirinya kerana parti komponen BN ini sedang bersaing dengan DAP.

"Tapi, itu sudah terlambat," sindir Ibrahim Ali yang "bersimpati" kepada Gerakan.  Beliau berkata, "Saya bersimpati kepada Gerakan.  Mereka sekarang ni parti kosong, tin kosong.  Mereka tidak mempunyai perwakilan dalam parlimen, perlu bergantung kepada perlantikan senator (untuk masuk ke parlimen)."

Setelah diingatkan bahawa Gerakan masih mempunyai dua orang ahli dewan rakyat yang terpilih dalam PRU ke-12, Ibrahim Ali berkata, "Ya, mereka mempunyai seorang dua, tapi itu tak cukup, mereka masih memerlukan senator untuk mempertingkatkan bilangan kerusi mereka."

Biar rakyat menilai
Sebelum ini, Ketua Wira PERKASA, Arman Azha Abu Hanifah mendesak agar Naib Presiden Gerakan, Teng Hock Nan dan Timbalan Setiausaha Agung Pemuda MCA, Low Chew June meminta maaf berikutan tuduhan mereka terhadap PERKASA sebagai NGO yang bersifat perkauman, di samping mempertikaikan kenyataan bekas PM, Mahathir Mohamad ketika merasmikan Mesyuarat Agung Pertama PERKASA.

Walau bagaimanapun, kedua-dua Teng dan Low (gambar kanan) enggan meminta maaf.  Ketika mengulas isu ini, Ibrahim Ali memberitahu MerdekaReview, "Terpulanglah kepada mereka untuk memohon maaf atau tidak.  Rakyat akan menilai siapa yang betul.  Akhirnya, orang tahu Tun (Mahathir) adalah rasis atau tidak."

Ibrahim Ali memberi amaran, "Mereka akan kehilangan lebih sokongan.  Sokongan Cina tu penting, tetapi Melayu juga penting.  Mereka perlu menjaga tingkah laku mereka.  Kalau mereka terus dengan kenyataan kontroversi sebegini, mereka akan kehilangan lebih sokongan!"

PM memahami PERKASA
Selain itu, Ibrahim Ali juga menghargai kenyataan Perdana Menteri, Najib Razak bahawa PERKASA bukan kumpulan ektremis.  Ibrahim Ali berkata, "PM memahami PERKASA dengan baik.  Saya amat gembira dengannya (kenyataan PM).  Kerana beliau seorang Perdana Menteri, beliau tidak berkata sesuatu sesuka hati beliau, beliau semestinya mempunyai laporan, mendapat maklum balas, kemudian barulah berkata kepada rakyat."

Of course Perkasa is not so extreme, when compared to Najib

“Perkasa is not so extreme, if you listen to them carefully. They can shout about Malay rights as long as they are not extreme in their views, and you know, to the extent that we can accommodate Perkasa. And we can accommodate also the non-Malays as well”,

Najib is quoted in this Malaysiakini report as having said this in an interview aired on Al-Jazeera.
Najib might have a point here.
He did not say ‘not extreme’, but ‘not so extreme’.
All very relative.
In a post here on 18th June, last year, I had written :

“Was Najib at the UMNO youth rally on 17th October 1987?
Yes.
Was he leading that rally?
He was then acting UMNO youth chief. I’d say yes.
Did he raise the keris and issue words to the effect that the blood of the Chinese would be spilled?
Don’t know.
Even if he did not, was he not leading  a rally that had on display enough paraphanelia that spelt out the threat to spill blood of a particluar segment of our Malaysian community without the need for Najib or anyone else to vocalise it or brandish weapons?”



Sure, Ibrahim and Mahathir Kutty were recently seen prancing around on a stage, wielding keris like a bunch of pansy school boys, but no-one has reported them making any threats to spill the blood of any particular community.

Compared to what ole pink lips has threatened to do, and is said to have done, Perkasa are pussycats!
Posted by Haris Ibrahim

Rakaman Wawancara Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim Di LSE,18 Mac 2010


 



KL May Okay Sports Betting

From Straits Times
By Leslie Lopez, Senior Regional Correspondent

Allowing gaming concession will raise revenue for govt, but it faces potential backlash
THE Malaysian government, facing its most serious budgetary crisis in decades, is leaning towards allowing gaming tycoon Vincent Tan Chee Yioun to revive a potentially lucrative gaming concession.

Government sources and financial executives close to the businessman said Prime Minister Najib Razak’s administration has agreed in principle to allow Tan Sri Tan, who controls the Berjaya Group, to proceed with the concession, which permits nationwide ‘off site’ sports betting.

But the government could face a potential backlash from the predominantly Muslim population, they added.
‘The economic rationale for allowing this is very compelling, but the PM has to weigh the political fallout because the opposition will have a field day,’ said a government official close to the situation. Mr Tan, one of Malaysia’s most politically well-connected businessmen, declined comment.

Bankers close to the businessman said that he had been actively lobbying the government for the past six months to allow him to activate his licence.


He told the government that it was losing hundreds of millions of dollars in foregone tax revenue to illegal betting syndicates.

Monday, 5 April 2010

DAP says procurement portal lacks details

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal - The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, April 5 — The DAP today punched a hole in the government's opaque procurement system, pointing out that a RM6.47 billion contract to supply meals to army camps in three states listed on the treasury's new website lacked details and could only lead to the conclusion that the amount spent could have bought the country four more submarines.

DAP national publicity officer Tony Pua told reporters here in Parliament that the MyProcurement Portal (http://myprocurement.treasury.gov.my) launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak last week severely lacked data “to make informed judgments with regards to a particular contract award.”

“There is a question of data integrity within the MyProcurement portal and what steps are being taken to verify the information posted on the site. If the information on the portal is to be taken seriously, then surely the information posted must be accurate to ensure a high degree of integrity,” said Pua.

According to Pua, a quick check on the portal revealed that the largest contract since June 2009 amounting to RM6.47 billion had been awarded to Syarikat Era Frozen Sdn Bhd by the Ministry of Defence.

“More curiously, the huge contract was for the supply of “rangsum segar” (fresh rations), which could have bought the Ministry four more submarines! While the value of contract for food items would have certainly raised eyebrows, I’d like to believe that there are some decimal point errors involved,” said the DAP.

Suspend me if you support Israel, Anwar challenges Parliament

HULU SELANGOR, April 5 - Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has dared the government to suspend him from Parliament if it planned to continue its support for Zionist Israel.

In a fiery speech at Kampung Sungai Tengi here last night, the Permatang Pauh MP continued his attack on the government’s purported link to Israel through international public relations firm APCO, adding that aside from outright denial, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had never answered to the allegations.

“These are same people who govern us, who preach to us that the rights of the Malays and the Muslims must be protected. Najib is not brave enough to answer to this.

“I am willing to volunteer myself — you continue to support Israel, you suspend me from Parliament. Suspend me, three months, six months, a year, I do not know.

“God willing, let the people decide for themselves,” he said.

Anwar condemned the BN administration for its willingness to seek advice from a company linked to “the murder of the Muslims in Palestine”.

“Apco is led by these people and Najib is seeking advice from them.

“I revealed the names of APCO’s leaders but they claimed I was wrong.

“I showed the agreement signed between Apco and Israel and still they denied.

“These people are advising Najib on strategic communication, on reform initiatives, on his New Economic Model, his education policies — all this, Apco carries out,” he continued.

Anwar added that as a lawmaker himself, he often engaged with foreign leaders to seek their thoughts and opinions.

“But I never took them as my advisor. Najib is doing this, and its not even Muslim leaders — it is people who work for the Israeli Defence Agency,” he claimed.

Anwar is currently facing the possibility of suspension over his attack on the government’s link with Apco and his claim that the company was also the brains behind Ehud Barak’s One Israel campaign.

Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz had said the government to refer Anwar to the parliamentary Rights and Privileges Committee over his allegations.

The Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department had said Anwar had so far not been able to provide concrete evidence to support his allegation that 1 Malaysia was taken from One Israel.

APCO has however released a statement denying the allegations made by Anwar.

NEM cast in deviant Vision 2020, NEP moulds

By Joe Fernandez

The newly-launched High Income Economy initiative by Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is an admission of the failure of Vision 2020 and the New Economic Policy (NEP) while not promising real political and economic change. This is the consensus among opinion leaders in Sabah and Sarawak and Hindraf Makkal Sakthi.

The former programme (1990-2020), it is noted, had projected that Malaysia’s economy would grow eight-fold within the context of Bangsa Malaysia to place it in the league of developed nations. The NEP (1970-1990), on the other hand, had pledged to eradicate poverty irrespective of race while restructuring society within the context of an expanding economic pie.
Instead, the beef is that Peter was robbed to pay Paul during the NEP years and its aftermath and “racial polarisation has never been higher in Peninsular Malaysia”.

Another sore point is that both Sabah and Sarawak were “not consulted” when the NEM was drawn up. In the absence of local input, their economies were not sufficiently considered in the NEM structure, claims CigMa (Common Interest Group Malaysia) chair Jeffrey Gapari Kitingan.

“It cannot be denied that the natives in Sabah and Sarawak were completely left out during the NEP years from 1970 to 1990,” said Jeffrey in Kota Kinabalu. “Vision 2020 was more of the same treatment. Now, we have the NEM which seems set to be a repeat of history.”

He did not touch on charges by Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim that NEM is a copycat programme of Pakatan Rakyat's Malaysian Economic Agenda (MEA). Jeffrey is also a vice- president in Anwar’s Parti Keadilan Rakyat.

Hindraf chair P Waythamoorthy, speaking from Singapore, concurs with views in Sabah and Sarawak on the NEM. However, his main concern is that there are no guarantees that the marginalisation of the Indian community would not continue under the NEM.”

“Vision 2020 promised a Bangsa Malaysia but we all know what has happened after 20 years,” said Waythamoorthy. “The Indians lost confidence in the ruling coalition and deserted it wholesale in the 2008 general election.”

He noted that the NEP will remain a cornerstone of the NEM. It was the deviations and distortions in the NEP and Article 153 of the Federal Constitution that lay at the heart of the Indian dilemma in Malaysia, added Waythamoorthy.

“We can expect that a small clique in Malaysia will continue to reward themselves with government contracts through nominees,” said Waythamoorthy. “So, the looting of the public treasury would continue under the guise of the Bumiputera, the NEP and Article 153.”
The Hindraf chair admits that he has been left wondering on the time period still left for the ruling elite in Malaysia to continue making hay while the sun shines.

Ali Baba culture
Jeffrey, chipping in from Singapore after a meeting with Waythamoorthy on the Hulu Selangor by-election, is cynical that the pledge in the NEM to eradicate the rent-seeking culture would be carried out in the absence of the necessary political will in Umno. Rent-seeking is a euphemism for the Ali-Baba syndrome where the Malay Ali secures government contracts and sells them to the Chinese Baba.

“The Ali-Baba culture is based on the politics of patronage, nepotism and cronyism practised by Umno,” said Jeffrey. “This kind of politics is based on the subsidy-driven dependency syndrome which feeds the politics of corruption and moral depravity in Umno.”

The influx of illegals into Sabah, says Jeffrey, has allowed them to enter the electoral rolls “and prop up the ruling coalition”. So, his question is whether the NEM will indeed do away, as pledged, with the cheap labour policy in pursuit of a high income economy.

Jeffrey’s reading is that the implementation of the NEM, without any deviations and distortions, should logically see the demise of Umno. The self-serving, apparently in the majority now, will lose interest in politics if it ceases to enjoy the skim cepat kaya (quick money scam) for Umno under the NEM, points out Jeffrey.
The bottomline, according to both the CigMa and Hindraf chair, is that “the more things seem to change – NEP, Vision 2020, NEM – the more they remain the same”.

Touching on the High Income Economic model itself promised by the NEM, it is noted by both men that the term “developed”, first raised by Vision 2020, is now being avoided like the plague by the Najib administration.

“The term high income actually means just that,” said Jeffrey. “You can dig diamonds out of the ground and be a high income economy but that doesn’t mean that you are developed.”
The other difficulty is whether the present US$7,000 gross national income per capita mentioned in the NEM takes into account, for example, the wild boar meat that the Penan in Sarawak enjoy for free or the jungle greens picked by the rural people in Sabah and Sarawak.

“This sum US$ 7,000 is an average. If a large number of people like the rural folks are included, the average gross national income per capita will be low,” said Jeffrey. “In short, if fewer people are included in computing the gross national income per capita, the figure will be high.”

No clear focus
SAPP (Sabah Progressive Party) president Yong Teck Lee was disappointed that the NEM doesn’t address regional economic imbalances, a key thrust in the pursuit of developed nation status.
“Yet, of the eight key sectors in the NEM, three are from Sabah and Sarawak, that is, oil and gas, tourism and land,” said Yong, adding that the NEM doesn’t stress an energy policy.

Among economists, there is consensus that besides ending the cheap labour policy, the federal government must re-distribute incomes under the NEM, implement a Minimum Wage Act, promise equal pay for equal work, allow foreign labour to join trade unions, end discrimination in the intake of foreign labour and impose punitive taxes on imports from countries employing child and “slave” labour.

Zainal Ajamain, senior research fellow of the Centre for remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (CerGIS), notes that Sabah in particular has too many plans with similar themes and no clear focus. This may have led to its virtual “exclusion” from the NEM.

Sedia (Sabah Economic Development and Investment Authority) president and chief executive Yaakub Johari begs to differ. He sees definite high income potential for Sabah in its flora, fauna and tourism.
“The NEM is only one of the several components in the federal government’s transformation plan,” says Pang Teck Wai, a Sabah member of the Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. “A failure in one component will cause a chain reaction and risk the success of the entire effort.”

Pang, also the CEO of the Palm Oil Industrial Cluster in Lahad Datu, like others laments the fact that Sabah has been excluded from the debate on the NEM.

Why are the Malays poor? Blame it on Umno!

Who squandered the national wealth on prestige projects while neglecting the poor? Who bailed out crony businessmen by writing off billions of ringgit, asks P Ramakrishnan.

Of late, the pressure is building up to convey the impression that the Malays are poor because of the non-Malays. It is trumpeted that the non-Malays are enriching themselves at the expense of the Malays.

This erroneous and mischievous line of argument is deliberately pushed to achieve two objectives: One, to get the Malays riled up and to create hatred for the non-Malays as the source and cause of Malay poverty. Two, this is a ploy to consolidate the position of these hate-mongers so that they can be accepted as the defenders of the race and champions who would deliver the Malays from their wretched situation.

But these extremist elements do not reveal how they have benefited from the policies of Umno that were meant for the welfare of the majority poor Malays. They do not reveal how the benefits have gone to the crony corporate figures and the well connected political elite irrespective of their ethnicity.

They do not disclose how billions of ringgit had been squandered to rescue the failed ventures of their elite group. They do not disclose how billions were pumped into Bank Rakyat and Bank Bumi to sustain them. They do not disclose why Mirzan Mahathir’s floundering and debt-laden shipping empire had to be bailed out with our national wealth. They do not disclose why Tajudin Ramli’s stake in MAS was bought over for RM8 per MAS share when the market price was only RM3.62.

Likewise many other individual Malays have benefited enormously. They don’t lose out when their businesses fail but they gain in spite of their failure. Contracts, licences, AP permits, new shares and whatnot are grabbed by these individuals for themselves and their families. The poor majority Malays do not benefit from these policies.

It was recently disclosed that out of RM54 billion in shares allocated for Bumiputeras, only RM2 billion were still in their hands. What has happened to the RM52 billion that cannot be accounted for? RM54 billion is a colossal sum of wealth that has been dished out. How did RM52 billion disappear into thin air?

After 40 years of NEP, it is absolutely unacceptable that the deserving poor have not benefited in the way it was intended. Sometimes we wonder if the Malays are kept poor simply and deliberately to get their votes by blaming the non-Malays for their abject situation.

Over the last 40 years, successive Umno presidents and deputy presidents served as prime ministers and deputy prime ministers wielding great powers, influencing policies and determining the fate of the Malays. Every Education Minister since Merdeka has come from Umno. Every Finance Minister after Tun Tan Siew Sin has been an Umno man. Every Rural Development Minister has been an Umno man. The Cabinet was dominated by Umno leaders. How is it that with this heavy representation of Umno leaders in the Cabinet the vast majority of Malays have remained deprived and desperately poor? How did Umno, ever ready to advance Malay interest, permit this neglect?

The Umno-dominated Barisan Nasional holds the purse strings of the national wealth. Why wasn’t this wealth distributed to the poor as well? Why did the greedy grab everything? Was this done without the knowledge of Umno leaders?

Don’t blame the non-Malays who have no say in the policies of the government; blame it on Umno. Who squandered the national wealth on prestige projects while neglecting the poor? Who bailed out crony businessmen by writing off billions of ringgit? It is Umno and nobody else! If the Malays are poor, it is because of Umno. Don’t blame it on others.

There is a serious lesson to be learnt from John F Kennedy’s view: If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.

Be warned!

P Ramakrishnan is president of Aliran

MEB : feeling of an affected individual

This is my second writing on MEB. After re-reading the long speech by Najib, I concluded that it is long on description of what a nice place we can get to, but how exactly we could get there remains vague. (Same like Wawasan 2020).

A man or a woman in the street would wonder:
1) would there be more employment opportunities for me and my children?

2) would there be better paid jobs and more advancement opportunities?

3) would there be education, training and re-training facilities available to equip us to handle the new skill sets required ? We have to think about the present and future set of workers in Malaysia.


Mind you, we have not even settle the debate of minimum wage yet.


An investor, local or foreign, might ask questions like:

1) would I have competent, motivated, productive and intelligent workforce to strive for my business that can justify higher pay?

2) how does the government scores in terms of bureaucracy, efficient, clean and business friendliness against other choices? ( if the DPM’s reaction to PERC report is anything to go by….)

3) would my family and investments be safe in this country? (cue: think crime rates and religious terrorism)

4) would I have excellent facilities and infrastructure to cater to my business? (our broad band still lags behind Singapore's)


I do not see anything succinct and to the point where I can get some concrete answers. I wonder what tax payers have paid NEAC for after almost a year into Najib’s era.

In a nut shell, the Najib administration (not surprised given the caliber of certain ministers and their tradition of Tingkatan Lima answers and MPs who specializes in sexist remarks) has no concrete idea and inviting public consultation is a clever political hedge.

This is not a bad approach if it came within 100 days of his honey moon period (Performance NOW) but its belated introduction makes his administration looks clueless after passage of Perak power grab, Teoh Beng Hock’s heroic death and on-going sorry looking inquest, religious terrorism, aborted attempt to implement GST and set limits on fuel subisidies etc.

As I wrote earlier (before Najib became the PM), we need to attract the right business and investment into Malaysia and have the right Malaysian human resource to handle the skills required of it.

In order to cultivate a capable work force, our present work force needs retraining and re-tooling and our education system has to be revamped. Najib spoke of this revamping but no details have been forthcoming. Mere lip service or what?

The performance of our Education Minister with “Malay-first Malaysian second mentality” plainly has not been inspiring up to point of writing. The slipping university rankings and crack down on freedom of thought by our undergraduates is a worrying indicator of the state of Malaysia's incubators.

The word “merit” has only resurface twice in his speech

“12. Sistem pendidikan kita perlu dikaji semula secara berterusan dan ditambah baik untuk melahirkan tenaga kerja masa depan, dengan komitmen kepada program berasaskan merit. Ini akan mendorong kecemerlangan dan memupuk graduan berbakat yang cemerlang dari segi pemikiran kreatif dan strategik serta kemahiran keusahawanan dan kepimpinan yang akan memacu kejayaan pada dekad mendatang.”

Tell me something I do not know.

And the next instance “merit” was being described as one of the principle of affirmative action.


Najib spoke of attracting talented and capable Malaysians would have left our shores to return without addressing the key reasons why they have left – whether Don’t Talk Shit agree or not - it is because these highly intelligent people feel that they are not being fairly and do not feel that they have sufficient chance to earn what they think they deserve, achieve self-actualisation and a place where they feel safe.

The access to residency in Malaysia needs to cater to diverse needs of various talents. Han Jian who coached Malaysia to Thomas Cup 1992 victory was denied Malaysian citizenship, I was told. Spouses of expats should be allowed to work with dependent pass so that they could bring in their own expertise and more willing to relocate to Malaysia. Back in 2004 I had a nightmare running from KL to Putrajaya back and forth just to renew an employment permit for an American engineer working in my country.

Whatever specific steps Najib spoke of, invoke some disappointment in me, given the imbalance of economic development in Malaysia and relatively unfair distribution of income and opportunities.

For instance:


80. Bagi mempromosikan pelaburan ekonomi ke tahap yang lebih tinggi, beberapa lot tanah di Jalan Stonor, Jalan Ampang, Jalan Lidcol, Kuala Lumpur, telah dikenal pasti untuk ditender dan dibangunkan oleh sektor swasta. Aset ini, jika tidak dibangunkan, adalah satu pembaziran dan meningkatkan kos penyelenggaraan kepada Kerajaan.

Jalan Stonor (near KLCC) is already well developed thank you. What about folks in Seremban, Ipoh, Kuantan, Raub, Taiping, Tawau etc? Why focus on an already very developed locality? Fine, if KL is the hub, what about Plaza Rakyat? The investors there have been cheated of huge sums since the 1990’s and given the STAR Station there, it makes more sense to address a “pembaziran” there.

I wrote elsewhere that DAP’s alternate budget advocates letting the respective state governments, with their intimate understanding of local conditions, be given the power to chart the development of their state’s economy. Najib’s MEB still bears the shade of Malayan Union where all significant power is centralized in Putrajaya. A big daddy won't to very efficient and detailed in tending to 13 children...time to let them have more say.

82. Selain itu, Petronas telah pun mengenal pasti dua subsidiari yang mempunyai prestasi baik akan disenaraikan pada tahun ini. Matlamat inisiatif ini adalah untuk mengurangkan penglibatan Kerajaan sama ada secara langsung atau tidak langsung dalam aktiviti perniagaan yang akan menjadi lebih cekap sekiranya dijalankan oleh sektor swasta dan memberi isyarat jelas komitmen menggalakkan persaingan dalam ekonomi, mengambil risiko dan merangsang pertumbuhan ekonomi jangka panjang yang akan memberi manfaat kepada semua warga Malaysia

Nice words but the first impression I have is, well more money goes into the government coffers from an IPO and some Malaysians who have spare money to invest in Bursa Malaysia could have an additional counter in their portfolio. What about the rest?

An alternative is let Petronas accounts be tabled scrutinized and debated in Parliament, and dividends from Petronas to be paid into a trust fund for healthcare, social safety net and education purposes. Cue: the way Norway government looks after their citizens. The Federal Government should retain its moral obligation to manage this strategic natural resource for the rakyat; and not let part of it goes into free market.

Since Najib say the government needs to let go and let the private sector lead the way, if I have to choose a strategic project to divest, I would say Proton. Nothing new, we have seen attempted strategic alliance with foreign car giants collapse so perhaps this is the chance to relook at that. The national car project should be subject to this treatment so that citizens can get a viable national car at competitive price and not having to pay for an AP.


As for the consultation process, it still remains to be seen how opinions are gathered and evaluated. In fact consultation is not even the beginning of the end or end of the beginning. After all, Najib has to balance the political considerations and hidden scenes within UMNO in addition to the real challenge faced by Malaysia in this borderless era. Timing wise, if Najib is going to hold a snap GE, the feedback from the consultation process could be a rich source of information for a GE manifesto.

Remember Su Qiu (it literally means inform and appeal)? Before GE of 1999, it was submitted to the Mahathir administration without any negative feedback but of course subsequent events after the GE was most disappointing, consider that many of what was raise then, was not inconsistent with some part of the nice things in MEB.

“I’m not biased, I’m impartial”

thenutgraph.com
IT'S been a long, uphill battle for the Malaysian judiciary over the past two decades. From Lord President Tun Salleh Abas's sacking in 1988 to the 1996 poison pen letter and the 2007 Lingam video tape exposé, the public is not unjustified in doubting judicial independence.

Familiar murmurings have begun again on whether anything has changed. Accusations of government bias and manipulation arose after the recent Federal Court decision declaring Umno's Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir as the rightful Perak menteri besar. The courts are also facing added scrutiny with the ongoing and second sodomy trial of Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi responds to these criticisms during an interview with The Nut Graph on 26 March 2010 at the Kuala Lumpur Court Complex. In this first of a two-part interview, he says there is no justification for accusing the judiciary of bias. He also discusses the effects of his prior link to the Barisan Nasional on public perception.
TNG: Former Lord President Tun Mohamed Suffian Hashim once predicted we'd have to wait a whole generation for the judiciary to recover from the assault on its independence when Tun Salleh Abas was removed in 1988. Do you agree that this incident was a serious blow to the judiciary's independence? 

I would not like to comment on the effects of what happened prior to me taking office. In 1988, I was not even a judge. I was just a practising lawyer, so it's not proper for me to make any statements on that.
Now that more than 20 years have passed since the 1988 judicial crisis, do you think the judiciary has recovered its independence?


Yes, I would believe so. I believe the confidence in the judiciary has improved a great deal.
I would like to state, and you can confirm this with the lawyers, that at the last Malaysian Bar annual general meeting held (on 13 March 2010), not a single issue was raised regarding the judiciary. They did not comment negatively at all on the judiciary, which, to me, is a good sign.

Could one reason for that be because the Malaysian Bar just held an extraordinary general meeting (in December 2009) on issues regarding key performance indicators (KPIs) for judges?
Yes, there was an issue about the KPIs. I gave an interview. I believe the lawyers were satisfied with the explanation. I think a large majority of the practising litigation lawyers now will say they are happy with the way cases are progressing.

I think the main issue now that you are concerned about is the perception that the judges are pro-government.
Yes, some writers, academics and political commentators have speculated that the courts are still acting under the directions of the executive, especially in relation to the Perak menteri besar case, and Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial. What is your response to these comments?
There is a small group of vociferous people out there, who go onto the internet and blogs and Facebook and all that and make comments without knowing the proper background. Many are not even lawyers.
It seems to me that for these people, as long as you make a decision against the government and the party in power, then the court is fair and reasonable. The moment you make a decision in favour of the government or the party in power, then the court is biased. But they have forgotten how many election petitions the Barisan Nasional (BN) has lost. They have lost about three quarters of such petitions, if I'm not mistaken.
People talk about Perak. I'm not too keen to enter into the arena of trying to argue that the decision was fair. But you see and judge for yourself, and you make your own decision. If there is any influence, why are there still decisions made against the government? If it wants to influence, the government might as well influence all decisions, from top to bottom.

Also, judges and judicial commissioners who have supposedly made decisions against the government have got promoted and confirmed as judges. So, how can you say that the judiciary is biased?
Do you think the fact that you have to recuse yourself from some of the BN-related cases also influences public perception of bias?  

I'm actually not biased, I'm impartial. But to avoid any perception that I'm biased where the BN is a party, or where the government is politically involved and is a party, it's best for me not to hear those cases. Justice must not only be done, but be seen to be done.
But would the [mere] fact that you had prior links to the BN cause the public to perceive a [government] bias?  

Since the time I took office as a Federal Court judge on 5 Sept 2007, as president of the Court of Appeal in December 2007 and as Chief Justice in October 2008, have I made any decisions in favour of the government?

If at all, some of my decisions have been against the government. We have released people on habeas corpus applications, and I have made decisions against the local government. I overruled the Datuk Bandar's decision regarding the use of a piece of land a few months ago. We ruled it was wrong.
Perhaps due to the past setbacks, there is a long way to go before the public can come to trust the judiciary again...
I don't want to talk about past issues, but I think we are moving in the right direction. It will take time, but those who lose their cases will still complain. I get letters once or twice a week saying judges are biased, that a judge is corrupt — all sorts of complaints when people lose their cases.
So, we investigate. So far, I have not found anything because if there is any evidence that a judge is corrupt, I will go after his [or her] neck without any hesitation. But if accusations are made without any basis, it's not fair for me to take action against the person.

But at the end of the day, the losing party will still say that there is no justice done. The winning party will say there is justice done.

Criticism has arisen again about the Court of Appeal's recent decision overturning Datuk Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus's judgement that the detention under the ISA (Internal Security Act) of Abdul Malek Hussein was unlawful. Do you have any comments?

They are now saying one judge is correct, three judges are wrong. It's more difficult to influence three judges than to influence one judge. And Hishamudin was promoted to the Court of Appeal. How do you justify that?
What is your response to the perception that the High Court judges have been more independent in deciding against the government, and that their decisions are then overturned by the Court of Appeal?

The High Court judges are the most junior. If I wanted to exert influence, the judicial commissioners would be the easiest to influence. They would want to become judges and go on to the Court of Appeal and Federal Court. It would be easier for me to tell them, "Decide in this manner and I will give you a promotion." Isn't it?
The higher up their position, the more difficult it is to influence. To the judges at the top, they are already there. They cannot be influenced by promotions. To influence a case [on appeal from the High Court], you have to influence three judges at the Court of Appeal stage, then three at the Federal Court stage. It's not easy to influence six people's decisions!

What do you think it would take for the public to regain trust in the judicial process?
What else do you want me to do? I don't go out of the way specifically to remove that perception. I will go on to do what I need to do. As far as efficiency of the judiciary is concerned, I am working very, very hard to improve the speedy disposal of cases and to reduce the backlog. That, I have done.
As far as the perception that there is bias, I just let it go. We are not biased. The judges are not biased or one-sided, so what more is there for me to do?

Maklum Balas YB.Nurul Izzah Terhadap Isu Pusat Permata Di Hulu Selangor Jika BN Menang

–Kenyataan Media–

MAKLUM BALAS NURUL IZZAH ANWAR, AHLI PARLIMEN LEMBAH PANTAI TERHADAP ISU : “PUSAT PERMATA DI HULU SELANGOR JIKA BN MENANG”

5 April 2010

Utusan Malaysia hari ini melaporkan isteri Perdana Menteri Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor turut bercadang untuk mewujudkan Pusat Permata Negara di Hulu Selangor jika Barisan Nasional (BN) berjaya memenangi Pilihan Raya Kecil Parlimen Hulu Selangor 25 April ini.

Sungguhpun saya mengalu-alukan usaha PERMATA untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan awal kanak-kanak di negara, namun berita ini amat menggusarkan saya. Usaha murni untuk menaiktaraf mutu pendidikan awal ini tidak seharusnya diberikan kepada rakyat dalam bentuk tebusan untuk meraih kemenangan di Ulu Selangor.

PERMATA selaku sebuah badan yang diiktiraf oleh kerajaan untuk memperuntukkan kemudahan pendidikan awal kanak-kanak dan telahpun diberikan peruntukan sebanyak RM20 Juta untuk usaha mereka, seharusnya memberikan sumbangan dan bantuan kepada semua kawasan yang memerlukan tanpa perlu menunggu adanya pilihanraya kecil.

Saya mempertikaikan keikhlasan hasrat Datin Seri Rosmah ini sungguhpun beliau mendakwa ianya akan dilaksanakan demi kepentingan anak-anak kecil di Ulu Selangor. Apakah beliau akan menafikan kemudahan yang dijanjikan sekiranya Barisan Nasional kalah dalam pilihanraya kecil Ulu Selangor kelak?

Saya menyeru kerajaan Barisan Nasional agar tidak memperalatkan kebajikan kanak-kanak untuk kepentingan parti sebaliknya melaksanakan tanggungjawab sosial kerajaan tanpa mengira politik kepartian serta kepentingan peribadi.

Nurul Izzah Anwar
Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai, WP

I am Malaysian first

By Kee Thuan Chye

I am proud to call myself Malaysian first and Chinese second. And if I were to tell other Chinese Malaysians that, I don’t think they will shun me.

Even if they do, so be it. Let them. If they are so narrow-minded as not to see the beauty of calling oneself Malaysian first, I don’t want to have anything to do with them.

I have two children to whom I have given Malaysian names, i.e. Malay, Indian and Chinese names. It is my contribution to Bangsa Malaysia. Their identity cards bear their full names.

In both cases, their Malay name comes first. And that is the name my wife and I call them by. We call our daughter Soraya and our son Jebat. To us, Malay names are also Malaysian names, and our children are Malaysian. We have no hang-ups about it.

Now, why can’t this be the norm in this beautiful, rich, multi-racial nation – a nation that is beautiful and rich because of its many races and cultures? Why must we separate ourselves into divisive categories? Why can’t we take the inclusive approach, consider each of our fellow citizens as being part of a whole, as part of us instead of as the Other?

Why is it so hard for someone no less than the deputy prime minister of this country to acknowledge that he is Malaysian first and Malay second? Why does he give the excuse that if he were to do so, he would be shunned by the Malays? How does he know for sure? Why does he presume the negative? Why would they shun him?

He is a leader of the country. Should he not instead be leading by example? For all we know, if he were to actually declare himself Malaysian first and Malay second, he might find others doing the same – and they may well be not just Malays but people of other races as well. Why does he fear to lead and instead prefer to take the safe and untested route? Why does he even take the exclusive line and say, “I am a Malay first”?

The basic function of leadership is taking the first step before anyone else, isn’t it? Especially if it’s a step in the right direction, towards the noble purpose of bringing the people closer together. It may be a risky step to take but if it’s the right one, morally and logically, who can judge you harshly?

PM waffles in interview

Walk the talk, leaders. Do what’s right, not what’s politically expedient. Why does the prime minister defend the deputy prime minister for saying he is Malay first? Why does the prime minister himself not say he is Malaysian first and Malay second when the TV station Al Jazeera put the question to him?

Granted, the Al Jazeera interviewer didn’t pose the question sharply. Instead of saying to the PM, “Let me then just ask you, are you a Malay first and a Malaysian second?”, she should have asked, “Would you say you are a Malaysian first and a Malay second?” That would have been to-the-point.

He would not have been able to wriggle his way out by saying, “Well technically, if we talk about the Constitution, I am a Malay but I’m comfortable being a Malay in a Malaysian society …” He wasn’t actually answering the question. And the interviewer wasn’t on-the-ball enough to pin him down.

Perhaps someone else should now pose the proper question to the PM so we can see how he responds. I would be disappointed if he waffled again. He is, after all, the man with the 1Malaysia slogan, the one that aims to unite all Malaysians. If he can’t walk the talk, how much credibility can we give the 1Malaysia concept? In fact, if he can’t walk the talk, how much trust can we give the PM?

At the end of the day, will it only be left to ordinary citizens like me to declare ourselves Malaysian first and whatever our race is, second? I’m sure there are many others out there – ordinary citizens – who will make that declaration with readiness and sincerity. Perhaps if our leaders won’t take the lead, we ordinary citizens should do it, ironic as it may sound. Perhaps we should show our leaders how to walk the talk. Why not?

Let’s band together and exercise our right, our power, as the rakyat. Let’s show Malaysia – and the world – that if our leaders will not take the lead, we the people will take up that responsibility. We will not be doing anything wrong. In fact, we will be doing what is good for our country. We will be bringing about the real 1Malaysia.

How about it? I am a Malaysian first and a Chinese second. What about you?

The Labu and Labi Team of Najib and Muhyiddin (Part 2)

By M. Bakri Musa
[Second of Four Parts]

The Best Team
The Razak-Ismail duo lasted just a month shy of three years, prematurely cut short by the sudden but not unexpected death of Tun Ismail. At first glance they had all the ingredients for a divisive and acrimonious relationship. One was a lawyer the other, a physician; two professionals not known to get along well with each other. Members of the two professions view society differently; likewise their approaches to problem solving. Lawyers cross examine their witnesses; doctors get a history from their patients. Lawyers assume their clients would lie; physicians implicitly trust theirs. Attorneys’ clients may think it is in their interest to lie; patients however risk their lives if they were to mislead their physicians.
What made the Razak-Ismail team worked remarkably well was that both were true professionals as well as consummate politicians in the best traditional mold. It was this combination that made their partnership blossomed. As professionals they were able to separate their personal feelings to address the problems at hand; as accomplished politicians they were skillful in the art of compromise, a fine sense of politics as the art of the possible. They were able to sink whatever personal, political and professional differences and ambitions they harbor in order to best serve their client: the nation.

They also shared many similarities. Under different circumstances or with other personalities, those similarities could well be sources of unending conflicts. Consider their age; only seven years separating them, with Razak the younger. Politicians are inherently ambitious and competitive; they all aspire to be the number one. The number two could hardly wait for number one to exit, making for an often stormy relationship towards the end, as demonstrated by the Tony Blair and Gordon Brown show. Being comparable in age would only aggravate that aspect of the rivalry.
Surprisingly, we did not see that kind of rivalry with Razak and Ismail. While Ismail was as ambitious as the rest, he was the original and genuine citizen-legislator. Meaning, someone who takes time off from his regular vocation to serve his nation, and then after giving his best, leave. Ismail was a rare breed, especially when compared to the specimens we have today; they make politics their permanent careers. Najib’s cabinet, like Abdullah’s and Mahathir’s before that, is infested with tired old career politicians who have no life outside of politics. They hung on long past their shelf-life.
Both Razak and Ismail were also aristocrats, Razak from Pahang and Ismail, Johor. They both attended English schools and the best English institutions; Razak read law at Lincoln’s Inn and Ismail, medicine at Melbourne. Jagoh kampong (village champions) they were not. They were not insular as they had competed successfully against the world.
Those similarities may have contributed to their cordial and workable relationship, but those were not the main factors. Instead what them “click” was their deep commitment to public service. They were true patriots. It was this that made them overcome whatever differences they may have had between them.
And differences there were! In personality, the two could not be more dissimilar. Ismail was the gregarious type; he knew how to enjoy life. As a medical student he idled his time on the cabaret floor on the evening before his crucial anatomy oral examination!
Razak was the studious one; he was a legend at Malay College. He completed his law studies well before his scholarship ended. At social gatherings I could not imagine Tun Razak backslapping his guests or joining them in uproarious laughter, as Dr. Ismail would.
Being from the predominantly Malay state of Pahang, Razak’s political philosophy was more towards Malay nationalism. Ismail hailed from the more urban and cosmopolitan Johor; that shaped his worldview.
Yet these differences complement them rather than being sources of rivalry, a reflection of their great sense of self confidence. Ismail did not need to aspire for the top post in order to show his stuff, while Razak was not in the least threatened by having someone of the caliber of Ismail as a deputy. Malaysians were blessed to have a pair of such caliber helming the nation. It is sad that their success did not inspire the present generation of leaders to emulate if not better that team of Razak and Ismail.
The Longest and Most Enduring
If as Prime Minister Tun Razak did not feel threatened by having a highly capable deputy in the person of Dr. Ismail, the Tun also did not feel that being a deputy to the Tunku would hamper his ability to contribute towards the nation. He also did not view being in the number two slot for an inordinately long time as a reflection of his ability. Only when the Tunku’s leadership was wanting in the aftermath of the 1969 race riots did Razak assert himself.
Razak could have headed UMNO and thus be the country’s first prime minister if he had wanted to; the opportunity was there. When the party’s first president, the towering Datuk Onn, left the party sulking in 1951, many wanted Razak to take over. He was not yet 30 at the time, and already they recognized his exceptional leadership and executive talent.
Razak politely declined the honor, not out of a sense of false modesty or lack of confidence, rather his astute reading of the Malay psyche and culture. He rightly believed that his community would more readily accept as leader someone older and thus perceived to be more experienced. In Malay culture, age equals wisdom; hence his declining the honor. Instead, Razak was instrumental in persuading the initially reluctant Tunku to head UMNO.
At another level, UMNO’s stated mission then was merdeka. Razak was shrewd enough to recognize that the party would need someone whom the British would find comfortable to negotiate. The affable and anglophile Cambridge-bred Tunku fit the bill. That was a particularly prescient call on Razak’s part, reflecting his wisdom and foresight despite his youth!
Razak’s wisdom in turning to Tunku was manifested in other ways. It turned out that the major obstacle in the negotiations for merdeka was not with the British but the Malay sultans. The British knew that colonialism was no longer chic or compatible with the values of a civilized society. They were ready and eager to let go of their colonies. The sultans however, were an unanticipated issue. Their concerns about their status in an independent Malaysia made them recalcitrant. They were not without reasons; they saw only too clearly the fate of the Sultan of Jogjakarta in neighboring Indonesia, as well as the multitude of Maharajas in India.
With Tunku, a member of the Kedah royal family leading the negotiations, the sultans felt reassured. Had it been the commoner Razak, the negotiations would definitely have been tougher.
Many ascribe the enduring partnership of Rahman and Razak to their presumed traditional Malay father-son relationship, with the loyal son always deferring to the father. Nothing could be further from the truth. I had never seen any public display of filial genuflecting by Razak to the Tunku. When the Tunku was swamped in the aftermath of the May 1969 riot, Razak was not at all bashful in taking over. That was certainly not the response of a supposedly obedient son or display of undivided filial devotion.
Instead their relationship was akin to that of a non-executive chairman of the board and the chief executive president. While Tunku was prime minister, it was Razak who actually ran the country. All the major initiatives, from overhauling of the education system to the massive rural development, originated from and executed by Razak.
A comparable dynamics would be between the ambassador and his deputy chef de mission in the old Soviet embassies. The real power and authority resided with the DCM, not the titular number one, the ambassador. He was merely the figure head, the sultan as it were. In that way, he (very rarely she) could indulge himself at diplomatic functions like getting drunk without compromising embassy secrets. Similarly if the ambassador were to be blackmailed, he could be readily expended.
I always thought that to be an ingenious scheme! It was certainly successful with the Soviets; it was no less so with Tunku and Tun Razak.