A complaint under Swiss criminal law has been lodged by lawyers against UBS AG bank.
It follows our devastating revelations about the bank’s involvement in the channelling of nearly a hundred million dollars of timber kickback money, linked to the Chief Minister of Sabah, Musa Aman.
We have demonstrated how the Hong Kong branch of UBS AG and its former ‘wealth management advisor’, Denis Chua, were involved managing every stage of an elaborate series of ‘layered’ accounts, which funnelled money from timber tycoons through a series of nominees, coordinated by Musa’s known “middleman” Chia Tien Foh (Michael Chia).
Yesterday, we showed how statements from UBS AG itself confirmed that money had been regularly drawn from a number of this web of accounts to meet the expenses of Musa’s two sons who were studying in Australia. Some of these accounts were held in the name of Michael Chia himself and yet Musa has gone on the record claiming “I have no business association whatsoever with an individual named Michael Chia”.
Spotlight on UBS AG
The development turns the spotlight firmly onto Switzerland’s largest bank.
Assisting money-laundering is a criminal offence under Swiss law and it is also specifically contrary to the path-leading Wolfsberg Principles of which UBS AG was a proud founding signatory. The Wolfsberg Anti-Money Laundering Principles for Private Banking were drawn up in Switzerland in 2000 under the auspices of Transparency International and UBS was one of eleven global banks who signed up to them.
The Wolfsberg Group website states:
“In early 2007, the Wolfsberg Group issued its Statement against Corruption, in close association with Transparency International and the Basel Institute on Governance…..Shortly thereafter, the Wolfsberg Group and The Clearing House Association LLC issued a statement endorsing measures to enhance the transparency of international wire transfers to promote the effectiveness of global anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing programmes”.Sarawak Report now has in its possession evidence of numerous such international wire transfers relating to Musa Aman and his associates, which formed part of a Malaysia Anti Corruption Commission enquiry in 2008.
That enquiry recommended 40 charges be brought against Sabah’s Chief Minister for accepting tens of millions of dollars in kickbacks for issuing logging licences to timber cronies.
Many of these concessions were awarded in previously protected Reserve Forest regions and in areas marked out for international protection under the Heart of Borneo Treaty.
Others were on steep hillsides after contour maps had been deliberately distorted in the Forestry Department records, so that logging could be ‘legally’ permitted.
However, despite the evidence, the Attorney General, Abdul Gani Patail, Musa’s relative and political ally, has refused to allow the prosecution to go ahead.
The question now is why UBS AG, after all the information surrounding this case has failed to investigate or take action against possible money laundering through accounts linked to politically exposed persons in Sabah?
Basel connection
The complaint against UBS has been launched from the same Swiss City where the Wolfsberg Principles against international money-laundering were established.
The Swiss lawyer and compliance expert Monika Roth has launched the complaint to the public prosecutor on behalf of the Sarawak environmental and human rights NGO, the Bruno Manser Fund, which is also based in Basel.
The NGO believes the likelihood is that the bank will soon face criminal proceedings as a result:
“The Bruno Manser Fund accuses UBS of having breached its due diligence duties as defined by the Swiss Criminal Code and calls on Swiss authorities to take criminal action against UBS and those responsible for the bank’s relationship with Musa Aman. The Malaysian politician has been Chief Minister of Sabah since 2003 and is the brother of Malaysia’s Foreign Minister, Anifah Aman. He is being accused of having laundered over USD 90 million of corruption proceeds through a number of bank accounts with UBS in Hong Kong and Zurich. In April 2012, the Swiss Federal Office of Justice confirmed that Switzerland has given legal assistance to Hong Kong authorities over Musa’s ties with UBS”.[See full statement]The NGO goes on to say that it has handed in numerous documents as evidence to the Zurich Public Prosecutor’s Office, which prove that Michael Chia, a close associate of the Sabah Chief Minister, organized large cash payments from timber companies with logging interests in Sabah to UBS bank accounts in Hong Kong.
It goes on to say that “from the same accounts, payments have been made to Musa Aman’s sons in Australia and to Mohd Daud Tampokong, a senior forestry official from Sabah”.
Beginning not the end of the affair
Musa Aman may have hoped that his denials and the assistance of his ally and relative Abdul Gani Patail could silence the investigation by Malaysia’s own corruption authorities. However, now that the matter has been internationalised it looks likely that we have seen only the beginning of this affair.
The ball is now in the court of UBS AG, which has already indicated its concerns over the public perceptions resulting from this murky matter.
31 comments:
Musa seorang yang begitu sayangkan alam sekitar, beliau adalah ketua menteri yang menghentikan pembalakan di Ulu Segama Malua dan Maliau Basin serta mewujudkan hutan penampan untuk melindungi Lembah Danum daripada pembalakan, perlombongan dan pembukaan tanah untuk tujuan pertanian
bagi dakwaan di atas, belum ada bukti yang benar2 kukuh membuktikannya.
agaknya ada pihak yang iri hati dengan kejayaan Sabah dibawah pentadbiran Musa Aman dalam usaha melindungi hutan2 dan bioversiti negeri menerusi pelaksanaan Pengurusan Hutan Secara Mapan (SFM)..
antara bukti kejayaan kerajaan negeri Sabah dalam melindungi hutan2 di Sabah ialah Hutan Simpan Deramakot dan projek Ulu Segama-Malua..
sabah di bawah pentadbiran musa aman selaku KM kini semakin berkembang maju dengan banyak projek2 pembangunan giat dilaksanakan..
kerajaan negeri juga berusaha untuk melindungi hutan2 di sabah melalui SFM..ini adalah bukti kesungguhan kerajaan negeri..
musa juga telah berjaya meningkatkan hasil rizab kerajaan negeri sejak menerajui kerajaan negeri..kemampuan dan keupayaan musa aman inilah yang dicemburui oleh pihak2 luar..sebab itu lah beliau sering kali dikaitkan dengan tuduhan2 liar..
Exclusive again? Wasting time.
Apa pun yang berlaku, ini hanya pernainan politik yang tidak habis habis!
What a rubbish.
This is conspiracy.
Sumbangan KM kepada Sabah memang banyak terbukti cuma segelintir pihak yang suka menimbulkan masalah menjadi isu utama.
Jangan biarkan hasad dengki menjadi kayu pengukur.
Sabah semakin membangun di bawah pemerintahan Datuk Musa, cuma ada segelintir rakyat Sabah yang masih tidak berpuas hati.
mainan politik ini, sukar di ramal.Macam2 pembangkang sanggup buat.
Belum ada bukti kukuh berkenaan dakwaan tersebut. Selagi belum ada bukti kukuh, ini hanya khbar angin yang ingin menjatuhkan CM kita.
Datuk Musa telah banyak memberi sumbangan yang besar kepada Sabah, tidak hairanlah pembangkang cemburu dan ingin menjatuhkan beliau.
There will be no environment conservation laws in Sabah if Musa allows illegal logging. Besides, 60% of Sabah's land is covered with forest.
Sarawak Report is pro-opposition. Their report will definitely biased. Are they going to reveal the oppositions' misdeeds? NO! So, why want to believe SR?
Guilty until proven. Judging Musa by 'street laws' will not threaten his position.
I wonder what will happen to the UBS after facing the criminal complaint in Switzerland?
We shall wait and see what they can reveal next about this case. The truth will be known.
http://sabah-go-green.blogspot.com/
Sejak Musa dilantik sebagai Ketua Menteri, pembangunan negeri terus rancak, pendapatan negeri terus meningkat, simpanan tetap negeri terus meningkat, dan yang paling penting bajet kerajaan negeri, merupakan bajet tertinggi di anatara negeri-negeri di Malaysia. Sebagai imbangan, bajet Sarawak untuk tahun 2012, hanya 3.9 bilion, manakala Sabah, 4.03 bilion.Berbanding dengan bajet Selangor yang hanya 1.6 billion.
Skandal Taib Mahmud lagi hangat ni. sampai ke Britain, Switzerland dan Jerman.
Saya taktau pasal Taib namun jangan la asyik nak buka pekung dada la pula.
This issue should be put to rest.
Bagaimana pula dengan isu ini pula...
Ini harta Azmin ketika itu. Yang hairan gaji RM2,400 pada masa itu Azmin mampu memiliki harta yang banyak daripada gajinya sendiri. Azmin Ali didakwa memilki harta sejak 1991 – 1995, antaranya sebuah BMW 325i, Proton Wira 1.6 Xli, Proton Satria 1.6 Xli. Proton Perdana 2.0 SE, 1000 saha,m Hicom, sebuah rumah No. 23, Jalan 1/4D Bukit Mas, Taman Melawati seluas 8500 sqft. Bayangkan harta Azmin kekayaan azmin?? Siapa ketuanya sudah pastilah Anwar. SEBAB ITULAH JUGA KENAPA AZMIN TERUS SETIA DENGAH ANWAR. KERANA INGIN MEMBALAS BUDI ANWAR DULU TERHADAP DIRINYA. BOLEH FAHAM SEKARANG APA YANG BERLAKU DENGAH KES RASUAH PEMBANGKANG. YANG SELAMA INI ASYIK MENUDUH KERAJAAN MAIN RASUAH. TAPI ANWAR TIDAK SEDAR YANG MANA DIA PUN TIDAK LARI DARI RASUAH. KITA MAHU KES INI AKAN TERUS DISIASAT. ANWAR MENYALAHGUNA KUASA SEMASA MENJADI TPM DAHULU.
ada saja tuduhan yang dilempar untuk kepentingan politik walaupun kesahihannya boleh dipertikai.
isu Azmin yang hangat diperkatakan sekarang ini..namun pemimpin pembangkang berdiam pula pasal isu ini.
Sabahan should be glad that Sabah is closely monitored by those who are interested in sustainable development. unlike the previous CM who give away our 300 000ha valuable forest to 265 companies/cronies..
Isu kitar semula ni, tapi sehingga sekarang belum ada apa2 lagi, tapi boleh percaya ke Michael Chia tu?? Penjenayah akan buat apa saja untuk escape.
PKR dengan penyelewengan Talam di Selangor apa cerita..
Post a Comment