By John Doe
"production for use and the direct allocation of economic inputs to satisfy economic demands and human needs (use value); accounting is based on physical quantities of resources, some physical magnitude, or a direct measure of labour-time.[4][5] Goods and services for consumption are distributed through markets, and distribution of income is based on the principle ofindividual merit/individual contribution..." - Socialism
Simply put, it means: "Those who have more should help those who have less..."
The NEP is directly based on the above two core
concepts of Communism, and Socialism. I'd like to see UMNO scream, and
shout, and rant now. In fact, Socialists inspired by the Soviet model
of economic development, such as Marxist-Leninists, have advocated the
creation of centrally planned economies directed by a single-party
state that owns the means of production.
Read
all the key words above again. They are nouns. Perfect Nouns.
Socialism, Communism, Marxist-Leninists, distribution based on need and
social relations, Centrally-planned economies and single-party state.
And the verb is "own the means of production". Now for brain-exercise
time. Who issues the licenses? Who controls the licenses of what people
listen to? Who issues the license of what people watch on TV? Who says
the richer shall help the poorer? Who says that the very concept of
NEP is not Communal in nature?
Let's look at other terms in use:
'The
proletariat', who collectively constitute the main producer of wealth
in society, and who are perpetually exploited and marginalized. Surely
even one with a feeble mind does not need to think very hard to guess
who that refers to.
It
has become very obvious that UMNO read and memorized Karl Marx's book,
Communist Manifesto. For in it, he laid out a 10-point plan advising
the redistribution of land and production to begin the transition to
communism, but he ensured that even this was very general and
all-encompassing. It has always been presumed that Marx intended these
theories to read this way specifically so that later theorists in
specific situations could adapt communism to their own localities and
conditions.
On the History issue again, let us start to rewrite Malayan History, by starting out with:
Malaya was conquered by a Hindu Indonesian from Palembang. Malaya was then known as Tanah Siam. Sejarah Melayu confirms this, when it demonstrates how the King of Temasik was murdered by this incoming Hindu Prince from Indonesia. This murdering Hindu Indonesian did not respect the Sovereignty of Thailand. He just came in and took whatever he wanted. None of his descendants have been punished for those crimes yet. Yes, Sin can be passed down Genealogically. Just ask any Christian, Muslim or Jew. So, if your Grandaddy did something wrong, and if he was not punished yet, then you, the grandchild needs to pay for it. Illogical? Tell that to all those who say "I believe, and therefore, its true".
Back on the History
of Malaya, subsequent conquerers came and went. Anyone who fought the
conquerers are heroes, any who did not are deemed traitors to the land.
Simple as that. Check the year, and if it was a year where locals
fought the "Foreign Party", then, they should be called heroes.
Amazingly, Malaysia decided to award Bumiputraship to the Portuguese,
adopt 15% of the Portuguese Language into their own, and work with the
Japanese Forces during WW 2 instead. Look East is a clear demonstration
of how Malaya sucks up to their non-Muslim former invaders. Stupid?
who knows... Ironically, UMNO is also actively shooting those who
contribute the most to the Income-Tax Coffers of Malaya.
Perhaps
Ghaddafi should be the next UMNO leader. He has plenty of money, is
currently in dire need of a new home, and looks rather Malay-like
anyway. Just pop a non-Islamic songkok and samping on him, and he'll blend right in. But hey, according to the Constitution, even an Eskimo, or Osama bin Laden can be a Malay.
I'll end with "Stupid is as stupid does". In the meantime, let's all get rid of UMNO.
No comments:
Post a Comment