By Hafiz Yatim | Malaysiakini
Dec 3, 10
Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim today accused Parliament’s rights and privileges committee of pushing for his suspension without hearing his defence on his allegations about US-based consultancy Apco.
Bukit Gelugor MP Karpal Singh, who is a member of the powerful committee, said today’s meeting was called without any fixed agenda.
Karpal said the committee members were given a letter from Apco, dated Aug 19, at the meeting.
“Suddenly, Muar MP Razali Ibrahim moved a motion that the matter be heard and the motion was seconded by Alor Gajah MP Dr Fong Chan Onn,” he said.
“R Sivarasa (Subang Jaya MP) was also there, and we protested against the hearing of the matter. I questioned the hurry, and Razali asked, ‘why not?’,” added Karpal.
Following this, Karpal said that he and Sivarasa walked out of the meeting in protest.
“The meeting went on without our presence,” he said. Karpal and Sivarasa said they had no idea what transpired at the meeting after they left.
Anwar: Decision is totally outrageous
Anwar, who was also present at the press conference, described the process as “totally outrageous”.
“When I was referred to the committee, the speaker had promised a proper hearing where documents will be presented, and I will be able to defend myself,” he said.
“However, this is not being done. This is unfair, and a black mark in Parliament’s history,” he added.
He showed the Parliament Hansard dated April 22, where Ipoh Timor MP Lim Kit Siang had raised the issue, and the speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia’s (left) reply which stated the rights and privileges committee will call whomever witness to testify and important documents will be tabled.
“We will call anyone who is needed and documents wil be tabled. The committee will then make its recommendation and decide on the proper punishment,” Pandikar was quoted as saying.
Anwar’s lawyer, Ambiga Sreenevasam (right), said the Parliament had acted against the rule of natural justice by having the rights and privileges committee meet without calling Anwar.
“This has never happened before in courts where a person is at least given his right to defend himself, but this was not done,” she said.
Anwar said if he was to be called he had prepared his defence, showing the file which he had with him.
“I have all the evidence to rebut all the allegations and denial but I was not given the right to defend myself.
“They are merely taking the words from a document (Apco) and not from other witnesses including me. This is truly unfair and undemocratic and violates the rules of natural justice,” he said.
Despite the adversities he faced, the Permatang Pauh MP is prepared to face the music when parliament resumes on Monday.
The powerful rights and privileges committee, which is tasked to discuss the 1Malaysia and One Israel issue, comprised of House speaker Pandikar Amin, deputy speaker Ronald Kiandee, Karpal Singh, Sivarasa, Nancy Shukri, Dr Fong Chan Onn and Razali Ibrahim.
Committee had made a decision
When contacted later, Pandikar Amin, who chaired today’s meeting, said that the committee had made a decision.
However, he declined to reveal its decision and said the matter will be finalised on Wednesday.
The decision will then be tabled to Parliament for further action.
Anwar was also asked whether such actions directed to prevent him from coming to Parliament are signs that the general election is approaching, and to this Karpal responded he believed it is so.
“Such a move done by the committee is unwarranted,” he said, adding that despite being faced with the prospect of suspension Anwar was still eligible to contest.
“This does not affect his rights but it will only hinder Anwar’s presence in Parliament if he is suspended,” he said.
——-
Anwar barred from testifying over APCO accusation
By Adib Zalkapli | The Malaysian Insider
December 03, 2010
PETALING JAYA, Dec 3 — Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim will not be allowed to testify over his remarks linking Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s 1 Malaysia to One Israel, Parliament’s Rights and Privileges Committee decided today.
The committee’s decision was seen as an attempt to hasten Anwar’s suspension from Parliament, said DAP chairman Karpal Singh (picture) today.
The Bukit Gelugor MP said the powerful committee decided to rely solely on a letter from public relation consultancy APCO and not to call other witnesses and Anwar to testify.
The decision prompted Karpal and Subang MP R. Sivarasa to leave the committee meeting.
“Me and Siva have no alternative but to withdraw,” Karpal told a press conference.
He also complained that APCO’s letter, which he refused to disclose, was only submitted to the committee this morning.
The powerful committee is chaired by Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia. Karpal and Sivarasa are the only opposition MPs in the committee. The other members are Deputy Speaker Datuk Ronald Kiandee, Muar MP Datuk Razali Ibrahim, Alor Gajah MP Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn and Batang Sadong MP Nancy Shukri.
“In my view the Rights and Privileges Committee has abdicated from its responsibilities,” said Karpal.
He revealed that Razali suggested that the committee continue its proceedings without calling witnesses or Anwar to testify, and this was supported by Fong.
“The issue needs to be investigated, cannot be based on a letter and without calling witnesses and not allowing Anwar to testify,” said Sivarasa.
“Given what has happened, we can expect the impending punishment,” he added.
Meanwhile, Anwar described the decision today contradicted Pandikar’s assurance when allowing the motion to refer him to the committee.
“The Speaker had given an assurance that when an MP is referred to the committee, the member would be called to testify,” said Anwar.
“APCO is very powerful that one letter can overturn all our testimonies,” he added.
The Malaysian Insider had reported last month that Anwar would likely be suspended from December 15 following recommendation from the Rights and Privileges Committee for his remarks linking the Najib’s 1 Malaysia to former Israel Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s One Israel.
The move is believed to be a strategic attempt by the ruling BN coalition to throw the opposition momentarily off guard ahead of an expected general election, believed likely to be held in the first quarter of next year.
It is also believed to be a form of reprisal by the federal government after similar moves by Pakatan Rakyat administrations in Selangor and Penang to suspend BN opposition leaders from their state assemblies.
Anwar had initially been summoned to face the House committee on June 8 after he claimed that the supposedly Israeli-linked APCO Worldwide employed by the Najib administration was behind both the 1 Malaysia and One Israel concepts.
His remarks had dominated the previous parliamentary session earlier this year and had been used incessantly by opposition leaders as campaign fodder during the Hulu Selangor and Sibu by-elections.
Anwar’s hearing before the committee was, however, put off when the leader insisted on being accompanied by legal counsel — former Bar Council president Datuk Ambiga Sreenivasan.
He was later allowed to be accompanied by Ambiga under strict instructions that the latter would not be allowed to speak during the proceedings.
Despite this, Anwar’s hearing was put off and the matter had not been raised until this morning.
Any decision made by the Rights and Privileges Committee is subject to the endorsement of the Dewan Rakyat.
Dec 3, 10
Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim today accused Parliament’s rights and privileges committee of pushing for his suspension without hearing his defence on his allegations about US-based consultancy Apco.
Bukit Gelugor MP Karpal Singh, who is a member of the powerful committee, said today’s meeting was called without any fixed agenda.
Karpal said the committee members were given a letter from Apco, dated Aug 19, at the meeting.
“Suddenly, Muar MP Razali Ibrahim moved a motion that the matter be heard and the motion was seconded by Alor Gajah MP Dr Fong Chan Onn,” he said.
“R Sivarasa (Subang Jaya MP) was also there, and we protested against the hearing of the matter. I questioned the hurry, and Razali asked, ‘why not?’,” added Karpal.
Following this, Karpal said that he and Sivarasa walked out of the meeting in protest.
“The meeting went on without our presence,” he said. Karpal and Sivarasa said they had no idea what transpired at the meeting after they left.
Anwar: Decision is totally outrageous
Anwar, who was also present at the press conference, described the process as “totally outrageous”.
“When I was referred to the committee, the speaker had promised a proper hearing where documents will be presented, and I will be able to defend myself,” he said.
“However, this is not being done. This is unfair, and a black mark in Parliament’s history,” he added.
He showed the Parliament Hansard dated April 22, where Ipoh Timor MP Lim Kit Siang had raised the issue, and the speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia’s (left) reply which stated the rights and privileges committee will call whomever witness to testify and important documents will be tabled.
“We will call anyone who is needed and documents wil be tabled. The committee will then make its recommendation and decide on the proper punishment,” Pandikar was quoted as saying.
Anwar’s lawyer, Ambiga Sreenevasam (right), said the Parliament had acted against the rule of natural justice by having the rights and privileges committee meet without calling Anwar.
“This has never happened before in courts where a person is at least given his right to defend himself, but this was not done,” she said.
Anwar said if he was to be called he had prepared his defence, showing the file which he had with him.
“I have all the evidence to rebut all the allegations and denial but I was not given the right to defend myself.
“They are merely taking the words from a document (Apco) and not from other witnesses including me. This is truly unfair and undemocratic and violates the rules of natural justice,” he said.
Despite the adversities he faced, the Permatang Pauh MP is prepared to face the music when parliament resumes on Monday.
The powerful rights and privileges committee, which is tasked to discuss the 1Malaysia and One Israel issue, comprised of House speaker Pandikar Amin, deputy speaker Ronald Kiandee, Karpal Singh, Sivarasa, Nancy Shukri, Dr Fong Chan Onn and Razali Ibrahim.
Committee had made a decision
When contacted later, Pandikar Amin, who chaired today’s meeting, said that the committee had made a decision.
However, he declined to reveal its decision and said the matter will be finalised on Wednesday.
The decision will then be tabled to Parliament for further action.
Anwar was also asked whether such actions directed to prevent him from coming to Parliament are signs that the general election is approaching, and to this Karpal responded he believed it is so.
“Such a move done by the committee is unwarranted,” he said, adding that despite being faced with the prospect of suspension Anwar was still eligible to contest.
“This does not affect his rights but it will only hinder Anwar’s presence in Parliament if he is suspended,” he said.
——-
Anwar barred from testifying over APCO accusation
By Adib Zalkapli | The Malaysian Insider
December 03, 2010
PETALING JAYA, Dec 3 — Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim will not be allowed to testify over his remarks linking Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s 1 Malaysia to One Israel, Parliament’s Rights and Privileges Committee decided today.
The committee’s decision was seen as an attempt to hasten Anwar’s suspension from Parliament, said DAP chairman Karpal Singh (picture) today.
The Bukit Gelugor MP said the powerful committee decided to rely solely on a letter from public relation consultancy APCO and not to call other witnesses and Anwar to testify.
The decision prompted Karpal and Subang MP R. Sivarasa to leave the committee meeting.
“Me and Siva have no alternative but to withdraw,” Karpal told a press conference.
He also complained that APCO’s letter, which he refused to disclose, was only submitted to the committee this morning.
The powerful committee is chaired by Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia. Karpal and Sivarasa are the only opposition MPs in the committee. The other members are Deputy Speaker Datuk Ronald Kiandee, Muar MP Datuk Razali Ibrahim, Alor Gajah MP Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn and Batang Sadong MP Nancy Shukri.
“In my view the Rights and Privileges Committee has abdicated from its responsibilities,” said Karpal.
He revealed that Razali suggested that the committee continue its proceedings without calling witnesses or Anwar to testify, and this was supported by Fong.
“The issue needs to be investigated, cannot be based on a letter and without calling witnesses and not allowing Anwar to testify,” said Sivarasa.
“Given what has happened, we can expect the impending punishment,” he added.
Meanwhile, Anwar described the decision today contradicted Pandikar’s assurance when allowing the motion to refer him to the committee.
“The Speaker had given an assurance that when an MP is referred to the committee, the member would be called to testify,” said Anwar.
“APCO is very powerful that one letter can overturn all our testimonies,” he added.
The Malaysian Insider had reported last month that Anwar would likely be suspended from December 15 following recommendation from the Rights and Privileges Committee for his remarks linking the Najib’s 1 Malaysia to former Israel Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s One Israel.
The move is believed to be a strategic attempt by the ruling BN coalition to throw the opposition momentarily off guard ahead of an expected general election, believed likely to be held in the first quarter of next year.
It is also believed to be a form of reprisal by the federal government after similar moves by Pakatan Rakyat administrations in Selangor and Penang to suspend BN opposition leaders from their state assemblies.
Anwar had initially been summoned to face the House committee on June 8 after he claimed that the supposedly Israeli-linked APCO Worldwide employed by the Najib administration was behind both the 1 Malaysia and One Israel concepts.
His remarks had dominated the previous parliamentary session earlier this year and had been used incessantly by opposition leaders as campaign fodder during the Hulu Selangor and Sibu by-elections.
Anwar’s hearing before the committee was, however, put off when the leader insisted on being accompanied by legal counsel — former Bar Council president Datuk Ambiga Sreenivasan.
He was later allowed to be accompanied by Ambiga under strict instructions that the latter would not be allowed to speak during the proceedings.
Despite this, Anwar’s hearing was put off and the matter had not been raised until this morning.
Any decision made by the Rights and Privileges Committee is subject to the endorsement of the Dewan Rakyat.
No comments:
Post a Comment