Share |

Wednesday, 1 April 2009

Puja Umur

By Sheih Kickdefella

pujaumur00632009_1

DYMM Raja Perempuan Kelantan

More than a decade ago, when Annuar Musa and UMNO Kelantan wanted to dethrone the current Sultan of Kelantan, The Kelantan State PAS organised sholat hajat and prayed to the Al Mighty the throne will remain safe.

The leadership of Kelantan PAS remained loyal to the Tuanku and defended the palace more than any state government has done before. Be it the Lamborghini saga or the constitutional crisis they were always there defended the institution.

Ironically, it was the institution that sent them into oblivion in 1978.

I bet Tok Guru Nik Aziz had faced such a tough time convincing his supporters that it is Islamic indeed to remain loyal to the Sultan. But he has succeeded in doing so. Whatever vendetta in may be due to the 1978 crisis, Tok Guru has time and again proven that, not to ask what the palace can do for you yet always ask what you can do to defend the palace.

Daulat Tuanku.

pujaumur03022009

The Launching of Flora Fest in conjunction of The Keputeraan

pujaumur02702009

pujaumur02472009

pujaumur02222009

pujaumur01452009

4 of the 10 floats that participated in the opening ceremony

pujaumur00842009_11

The Princess, YAM Tengku Amalin A’syah Putri

pujaumur01752009

YAM Cik Puan Temenggong Kelantan

pujaumur02532009

The Kapcai brothers

pujaumur02042009

The Brass Band

Mourning the death of democracy

By Haris Ibrahim,

In a poll conducted in this blog in January which ran for a week, readers were asked to give their response to the question “Should Pak Lah stay on as PM or make way for Najib?”.

10,918 people took part in the poll.

Of these, 10,299, representing 94% of those polled, voted for Pak Lah to stay on. Only 619 of those who voted wanted Pak Lah to make way for Najib.

In January, too, a petition was launched, addressed to all MPs other than the one from Pekan, to enable readers to sign on and thereby direct their MPs to communicate to His Majesty the Yang DiPertuan Agong about the anxieties many have about the prospect of Najib becoming PM.

Last week, 142 MPs were notified that 3,946 signatories to the petition had directed them to inform His Majesty that their constituents had no confidence in Najib as the PM of our country.

Glean through cyberspace and you will find that again and again, Malaysians are expressing their concern and horror at the thought that Najib might, this very week, be appointed PM.

Yet, we are told that notwithstanding the clear opposition by so many to his appointment as PM, this must indeed come to pass as he has been chosen to lead UMNO and he who leads UMNO must, of necessity, lead this country!

Today, a little after 2pm, a copy of the petition, the full list of signatories and a copy of the notice to the 142 MPs was delivered to the man who must, in the coming days, decide if we, the rakyat, will have as PM one who so many have clearly rejected.

The Yang DiPertuan Agong has been sent these documents in the hope that as he makes his decision, he will be appraised of the strong sentiment on the ground rejecting Najib as PM.

After all this, should we still have to suffer Najib as PM, I shall treat this as spelling the death of democracy in our country.

In fact, in the light of what might soon be inflicted upon us, I shall, from tomorrow, begin to wear an arm band ( black or white, depending on the colour of my shirt ) as my final act of protest to Najib as the PM of the country that I love.

I ask you to join me in this final act.

I ask that you pass word of this to friends and family.

Ban “Altantuya” name - Najib crackdown bordering on Najib madness

With Datuk Seri Najib Razak all set to be sworn in as the sixth Prime Minister on Friday, all stops are off for a Najib crackdown – the latest being the ban on a Mongolian name, Altantuya Shariibuu, from public discourse.

When I said yesterday that Najib’s ascension as the next Prime Minister marks an enveloping darkness descending in all fronts of human rights, as hardly a day passes in the past fortnight without a new encroachment and erosion of the fundamental liberties whether freedom of speech, expression, assembly, association or the right to information, I had not expected to be vindicated again within 24 hours.

Sad. Very sad. It would appear as if Malaysia has not become enough of an international laughing stock in recent times chalking up a lengthening list of most shameful episodes, like

• the unethical, undemocratic, illegal and unconstitutional power grab in Perak orchestrated by Najib;

• wheelchair-bound DAP National Chairman and Bukit Gelugor Member of Parliament, Karpal Singh mobbed by Selangor Umno Youth goons in the parliamentary precincts interfering and menacing him from carrying out his parliamentary duties and subsequently charged in court with sedition for stating what all law lecturers teach in the law schools in the country that Rulers are subject to the law and can be brought to court in their official and personal capacities;

• the one-year suspension of DAP MP for Puchong, Gobind Singh Deo without parliamentary pay and privileges without giving him the right to be heard;

• my suspension from Parliament for saying that Umno is “gila kuasa” –which Umno President Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said as much in his farewell Umno presidential address the next day and which one Umno delegate adopted in the Umno Assembly general debate to pinpoint the causes of Umno’s downfall;

• the three-month suspension of Harakah and Suara Keadilan;

• Police and MACC violation of the doctrine of the separation of powers in harassing the Perak State Assembly Speaker and Perak State Assembly members for performing their State Assembly functions; and only two nights ago,

• the arrest of DAP Perak State Assemblyman for Tebing Tinggi Ong Boon Piaw for producing the “Democracy Tree” DVD.

What makes Najib think that getting the police to ban the mention of “Altantunya Shariibuu” in the Bukit Gantang and Bukit Selambau by-elections will end and release him from being haunted and hounded by serious swirling allegations about his suitability, integrity and legitimacy as the nation’s Prime Minister, particularly over the Altantuya Shariibuu murder case?

Will “Altantuya Shariibuu” become an unparliamentary term, justifying an MP to be suspended for a prolonged period or even expulsion for uttering the unspeakable Mongolian name?

Instead of quelling and quashing the swirling questions and allegations as to his role in the Altantuya Shariibuu murder case, the ridiculous ban on any mention of the Mongolian name will only have the effect of giving the questions and allegations a high-octane boost – giving even greater life, force and potency to them.

The Najib crackdown is bordering on a Najib madness – and all this even before Najib is sworn in as Prime Minister on Friday!

Three-way fight for No. 2 MIC post likely

By : B. Suresh Ram NST

IT looks like the race for the number two post in the MIC may see a three-way fight between incumbent Datuk G. Palanivel, party secretary-general Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam and former deputy president Datuk S. Subramaniam.

Another name being touted for the post in party circles is vice-president Datuk S. Sothinathan.

Palanivel may have the advantage of incumbency (and this does go a long way in politics).

But Dr Subramaniam is the sole cabinet member from the party and has the ear of party president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu.

And Samy Vellu's blessings are necessary for anyone to win the post.
Speculation has been rife that the party chief and his current number two are not on good terms and that the party supremo may be looking to someone else to take over from him.

While this may be just dirty politics being practised by detractors, there has been no clear indication that the two are working as closely as they should be.

Another thorn in Palanivel's side of late is opposition to him from some in MIC Youth.

This was evident in MIC Youth National Advisory Council chief S. Ramis' suggestion that Palanivel should not defend his post.

The race for the number two position becomes all the more important as Samy Vellu has announced that his record 11th term as party supremo will be his last.

Whoever takes over will have the heavy responsibility of reviving confidence in the party in the next general election.

Palanivel wrested the No. 2 post in 2006 from Subramaniam who held it for 27 years.

Selangor Youth leader M. Yogeswaran says that although Palanivel had never been tested, he had leadership qualities and good negotiating skills which were necessary to work with other Barisan Nasional component parties.

"Even Samy Vellu at one time said that he was a capable leader," he said.

Few are certain if Subramaniam is really keen on coming back to the position he first assumed in 1981.

The former deputy minister was non-committal when asked on Sunday whether he would contest. "I want to see what the situation is like. A lot of thought has to be put in."

But Samy Vellu said yesterday his former deputy told him he was interested in contesting the post again.

Dr Subramaniam may be seen as a dark horse, given his relatively recent rise to national politics but he is in the news almost daily as human resources minister and this is definitely a point in his favour.

A party insider said some felt it would be beneficial for the community to have someone in the cabinet as the party number two and eventually number one.

"It would be good for the MIC and Indians if Dr Subramaniam becomes the deputy president as he is the sole cabinet member from the party."

As a minister, he is able to raise issues concerning the community at cabinet meet- ings. The skin specialist is also well-liked by most and has come up step by step in the party.

He was one of only three MIC candidates who managed to retain their parliamentary seats in the March 8 general election last year. The others were Datuk S. Saravanan and Datuk S.K. Devamany.

"He is keeping mum at the moment," an MIC leader said on indications of whether the doctor was intending to go for the post.

Party vice-president, Datuk S. Sothinathan, the other potential candidate, is also believed to be interested in vying for the spot.

"Chances are that he is seriously thinking of going ahead and contesting the post but the drawback is that he does not hold any government post," a branch leader said.

The process of electing the deputy president, three vice-presidents and 23 central working committee members will take place at the MIC general assembly in September

********

009/03/31
Subra keen on making comeback


Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu and Datuk S. Subramaniam meeting in Sungai Petani.
Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu and Datuk S. Subramaniam meeting in Sungai Petani.

SUNGAI PETANI: Former MIC deputy president Datuk S. Subramaniam has confirmed his intention of contesting the party's number two position, MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said yesterday.

"Datuk Subra wants to contest. He told me that," he said.

Samy Vellu said he had also come to know that vice-president Datuk S. Sothinathan, dubbed as his "chosen one", would also be going for the number two position.

However, he clarified that he had not heard it from Sothinathan himself.

Samy Vellu said some quarters also wanted Human Resources Minister and party secretary-general Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam to go for the post.
He did not rule out the possibility of "outsiders" also deciding to join in the fray but declined to elaborate.

On whether incumbent deputy president Datuk G. Palanivel would succeed him, Samy Vellu jokingly said that if he were to die tomorrow, Palanivel would be the one to lead the party.

"I have said that I will hand over to my successor who will be the deputy president. There is no change in my mind."

He also denied that caste would be a determining factor in who will be the next deputy president. "We have never practised this."

Triumphant Samy Vellu

Translation by Sharmila Valli Narayanan

thenutgraph

FOR the week between 23 and 29 March 2009, Tamil papers highlighted the victory of Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu as the MIC president for a record 11th term. The Tamil dailies also reported a case of police brutality in Perak, and gave an insight into the plight of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees in Malaysia.

It's Samy Vellu!

There was jubilation and shock over Samy Vellu's uncontested victory as the MIC party president, and it was the dominant news on 23 March.


Samy Vellu (Pic courtesy of theSun)
Tamil Nesan, known to be pro-Samy Vellu (the paper publishes a poem by Samy Vellu every Sunday), waxed lyrical over his victory under the headline Datuk Seri Samy Vellu wins unopposed. The report stated that Samy Vellu won after former vice-president Datuk M Muthupalaniappan only mustered five nomination papers, while his other 48 were rejected. The paper also reported that Samy Vellu would not seek another term as president.

A whole page was devoted to comments by various MIC leaders on the importance of Samy Vellu's victory for the Indian Malaysian community. The report, titled The party and community will be further strengthened, quoted deputy president Datuk G Palanivel as saying: "For the next three years, Datuk Seri Samy Vellu, as president of the party, will ensure that the party and our community will reap many benefits."

On 24 March, Tamil Nesan ran an editorial on Samy Vellu's victory titled Let the leadership of Datuk Seri Samy Vellu strengthen MIC. "The unshakeable faith of the MIC branch leaders in Datuk Seri Samy Vellu's leadership has been proven once again ... We have no doubt that the next three years under his leadership will see him bring many beneficial and long-lasting changes to the party and the Indian [Malaysian] community."

Makkal Osai and Malaysia Nanban covered Samy Vellu's victory, but the tone was decidedly muted. Samy Vellu won without any contest, was the headline of Makkal Osai. On the same front page, below the picture of the triumphant Samy Vellu, it ran a story with a picture of Muthupalaniappan titled Democracy is dead in MIC, charges Datuk Muthu.

There were more columns devoted to his angry tirade than to Samy Vellu's victory. "Leaders can come and go but the party must survive," said Muthupalaniappan. He issued a warning about the party's future: "Nobody likes MIC anymore. Nobody wants to be in the party; they all hate it. Wherever I go, people advise me, 'Don't waste your time in the party, Datuk.'"

Malaysia Nanban's headline was stark: Treachery won. Nomination papers rejected, complains Muthu.

Police brutality

All the Tamil dailies reported a case of police brutality that has upset many Indian Malaysians in Ipoh. It was one of the front-page main stories on 29 March.

The facts of the case are as follows: K Vijayakumar was detained by police in Chemor. His brother K Pathmanathan and a friend, Uthaya Kumar, went to the station to get more information. As there was no news from Pathmanathan, his parents became worried. They were told by the police that the brothers had been moved to the Ipoh police station.

The next day, the anxious parents and relatives waited at the Ipoh court to get a glimpse of their sons. What they saw shocked them.

Vijayakumar appeared with swollen lips, and bruises on his hands and face. He told his parents that the younger brother was in hospital.

Malaysia Nanban, in the detailed story on the back page under the headline Brother and friend who went to visit elder brother in police detention beaten, quoted K Devagi, the elder sister: "When we went to the hospital, we saw our brother Pathmanathan handcuffed to the bed. There were stitches near his mouth, his left eye was swollen, his hands were injured, and he was in a semi-conscious state. It was so pitiful."

The paper reported that family members and Makkal Sakthi supporters, together with Perak assemblyperson A Sivanesan, Ipoh Barat Member of Parliament (MP) M Kulasegaran, and Kapar MP S Manikavasagam, held a peaceful demonstration with placards condemning the police for its action outside the Ipoh police station.

Makkal Osai in its story Brothers Vijayakumar and Pathmanathan beaten. Parents protest reported on the tense situation at the police station. It said Ipoh OCPD ACP Azizman Alias assured the parents that a thorough investigation would be conducted into the matter. "Do not blow up this situation. Please do not resort to unpleasant actions and disperse peacefully," he requested.

Tamil Nesan in its report Two brothers beaten while in police custody gave additional information on the brothers' background. It reported that their father, M Krishnan, was a former police personnel himself. It also quoted Azizman pleading for people to be calm. "Please do not spread rumours via SMS that the brothers are in critical condition. They will be released today and are in good health," he said.

Refugees protest


Sri Lanka on the globe (Source: Wikimedia)
Makkal Osai gave an insight into the misery of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees living in Malaysia in its front-page story on 24 March titled No peace in the country of our origin; no life in the country of our refuge! We fast to protest.

The report said about 7,000 Sri Lankan Tamil refugees living in Malaysia are fasting as a sign of protest against the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)'s refusal to look into their plight.

The spokesperson for the refugees, Kamalaraja Kulanthaivelu, lambasted the UNHCR's apathy towards them. "The UNHCR, which protects refugees worldwide, seems to turn a blind eye to the plight of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees here. Why does the UNHCR ignore us? We have no other choice but to go on this fast to highlight our dire straits."

The paper followed up on 25 March with a full-page story on the refugees' bitter experiences of living here. A feature titled We crossed the seas ... we are floating on tears contained many heartwrenching stories from the refugees about the terrible situation they face here.

One such story was about Arasa Ratnam, who was being held in a detention centre. "There were some people from Myanmar who were also detained with me. When the officials from the UNHCR came, they only took steps to release those from Myanmar ... I pleaded with them to help me, but my pleas fell on deaf ears," he said

Malays threatened by their leaders

ImageThe Malaysian Insider

by Muaz Omar

MARCH 31 - The recent congregation organised by a right wing Malay NGO, Perkasa has threatened to steal the thunder from Umno.

Led by controversial Pasir Mas MP Datuk Ibrahim Ali and former Hulu Klang assemblyman Datuk Fuad Hassan, Perkasa has put forward resolutions as a façade to safeguard the Malay race.

For a start, Perkasa seem to be competing for the same target group with Malay-Muslim political parties - right wing nationalist Malay supremacists.

The resolutions passed by Perkasa demand for a return of the supreme position of the Malay Rulers, for Malay rights to be upheld including the restoration of New Economic Policy (NEP) and the strengthening of the Malay economic position.

The assembly was attended by some 1,500 people from 65 NGOs and could have been considered a curtain raiser to the Umno general assembly which ended recently.

In a democracy, any formation of a group or NGO should be allowed to prosper as long as they subscribe to the rule of law, whatever their inclinations might be as long as they are not anarchic.

The theme of Perkasa assembly that the "Malays are in danger" seem to be a bit far fetched and is designed to instil a feeling of being under threat of extinction.

If indeed the Malays are under threat, where is the threat coming from?

Are the Malays under threat from the other races?

Or are the Malays under threat from its own race, which I can be persuaded to agree.

Or as I am more inclined to believe, is that the perceived threats to the Malays are mere illusions or false threats than actual significant threats by design.

The 'dilemma' that has befallen the Malays has been made into a political tool to project certain individuals and organisations that being portrayed as the ultimate champion of the Malay race.

However, as the Malays become more educated, they tend to take these self mutilating attempts by politicians with a pinch of salt.

The Malay community has had a long history of parochial and feudal system entrenched within the society.

In the past, the community would usually submit to the whims and fancies of its leaders - from the Malay rulers right up to former PM Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Never before have the Malays raised up to show their disgust and anger on the excesses, abuse of power and maladministration of their own leaders like they did in the 12th general elections last year.

This tide maybe attributed to the wave of advances in information technology that allowed people to access news and opinions which are now much more readily available.

An ever increasing young population has also contributed to this phenomenon creating a more inquisitive and critical society.

Wealth creation has led to a bulging middle class among the Malays and has developed a thinking that the Malays need not hang on to their leaders to survive.

In short, the Malays have begun to realize their true worth and that they will not allow their leaders to take them for a ride.

Even though the older generation still hold their leaders in high regard and have not shifted out of the stale paradigm, the rest of the Malay population are starting to warm up to egalitarianism which many hoped is not a masked heroism.

The Malays are beginning to shift their allegiance from one icon to another - dismissing and ridiculing an old and haggard warlord and replacing it with a zesty rebel.

The Malays have begun to reject an old system in favour of the new guard, many a time influenced by emotion and hate rather than backed by a rational and an objective mind.

The worry is that heroism will lead the Malays back to their old mantra of "the leader can do no wrong", which is exactly what the Malays do not need.

There ought to be a more thoughtful and pervasive debate among the Malays on the state of their affairs - politics, economy, social, etc.

The lack of objectivity among the Malays is borne out of frustration and anger that their anointed leaders have time and again abused and misappropriated their rights.

The lack of depth of discussions on the Malays is a reflection of the failure of the Malay academia and intellectuals.

The discussions seem to be revolving around quotas and shareholdings rather than paradigm shifts, information knowledge or transformational process.

The sentiments seem to be centred on minute significance like the keris or that sort of thing.

The Malays are now being offered with two political icons as their choice - a battered and bruised Umno-BN that underwent a rejuvenation process or some say cosmetic surgery led by Najib Razak and high riding PKR-Pakatan but lately beset with internal problems and scandals led by Anwar Ibrahim.

To the politicians or these so-called heroes, the Malays, just like any other race in this world, are human beings and are not commodities that can be sold or traded with throat roaring shouts to defend their honour when these leaders themselves are the ones reaping all the benefits, leaving crumbs for the rest.


The article above represents the personal opinion of the writer.

Program Anwar Ibrahim di Bkt Selambau, Batang Ai dan Bukit Gantang

BATANG AI (1hb April 2009):

4.30 PM: Rumah Panjang Lubok Subong

7.00 PM: Solat Maghrib di Masjid Kg Melayu

8.00-9.00 PM: Lawatan Rumah Panjang (akan ditentukan kemudian)

10 malam: Ceramah perdana di Lubok Antu

Untuk dihubungi: Sdr Hasrul Muhaimin Hasbi 012 2239 738

———-

BUKIT GANTANG (2 April 2009):

8 malam:Ceramah di Markaz Trong

10 malam: Ceramah di Markaz Sungai Tinggi

BUKIT GANTANG (5 April 2009):

9-11 pagi: Prog bersama YB Nizar

11pg -1 tghari: Dialog dengan Warga Guru

1-2 ptg: Jamuan Rakyat di DUN Sepetang (tempat akan di tentukan kemudian)

2-5 ptg:Rehat/meeting dgn Petugas

5-7ptg:Hi-Tea di DUN Changkat Jering

7.30 -8.30 mlm: Tazkirah (Surau/Masjid akan ditentukan)

9 - 11 mlm - 2: Ceramah Perdana

Untuk dihubungi: Hj Ismail 012 508 0344

———-

PEJABAT DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM

Clear bias of police: PKR cannot mention Altantuya in ceramah

What a bizzare order:

According to a state PKR leader, the police have imposed several conditions on PKR when issuing permits for the ceramah.

Among the main restrictions are:
* No instigating the crowd by questioning the Perak sultan’s decision
* No mention of the Altantuya issue must be made
* No racial and religious issues can be raised

Firstly, on Altantuya. What business do the police have in issuing such a directive?

Sub-judice? Then how come, for instance, there is no directive ordering BN not to mention Saiful Bukhari? Or perhaps make any references to belakang this, and belakang that, as Umno goons are wont to do.

If you want to say that it is not fair to call Najib a murderer, I can sympathise (although, suspending a MP for a whole year for such a thing is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of), but for our police - who are supposed to be neutral, a fact so easily forgotten in Malaysia - to arbitrarily consider the murder case out of bounds?

What nonsense.

The fact that Altantuya masks came out in full force, and the matter become such a scandal is because there are still too many unanswered questions on this issue.

If Najib was truly innocent and wanted to put the issue to rest, he needs to come clean and testify as to his involvement or lack thereof in court. Musa Safri (who I think heads Najib’s security detail?) also needs to testify to the same.

Najib should probably also attempt to sue the pants of the amazing multitude of foreign papers who have implicated him in the murder.

Since none of these have happened, of course the issue will still be live, contentious, and vigorously discussed.

As to not questioning the decisions of the palace, I think the police have once again overstepped their bounds.

If anyone were to openly call for the dissolution of the monarchy, or threaten any harm to the Sultan, then the police might have a right to act.

But to discuss decisions made by the palace? If the British Queen or any European monarch decreed tomorrow that all cats had to wear hats, do you think the public would discuss it? Do you think people would be arrested for discussing the decision?

Monarchs are traditional institutions that deserve our every respect. It would be sacrilegious however, to think of them as deities whose decisions and actions are infallible.

This bias on the part of the police is becoming intolerable. The ballot box is our only avenue to express our discontent - BS, BG and BA, you carry the flame for the rest of us!

Abdullah Believes There Will Be Continuity Under Najib

PUTRAJAYA, March 31 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said today he is convinced that Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak will continue to implement ideas and programmes initiated during his administration after his deputy takes over as the sixth prime minister of Malaysia.

"He will continue (with the projects)...I believe (that)...I just work on the basis of believing that if you do something that is good, if you continue, it will bring more good. I do not see any reason why it should be stopped," he said before hosting a luncheon for editors of the mainstreams media at Sri Perdana here.

He said the programmes included the various development corridors and the Islam Hadhari (Civilisational Islam) concept.

However, he said, Najib might see it fit to make adjustments to the programmes as and when necessary.

Asked whether he would be angry if Najib did not continue with what he had planned and implemented, as had happened with former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad he said: "No, I will not (be angry)."

Abdullah said he had spent hours talking to Najib on many issues pertaining the country just like he had with Dr Mahathir before.

He said he would not criticise Najib and would be very supportive of the government as he still had a role to play as a Member of Parliament.

Asked what role he would play after his retirement, Abdullah said he preferred Najib to make the announcement.

On the actual date of the hand-over of the premiership, he said he did not want to say anything more until he had an audience with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Asked whether he felt that he did not have time to complete all his programmes during his six-year tenure as Prime Minister, he said his 2004 election manifesto contained initiatives leading towards the achievement of the Vision 2020.

Howeverhe did not have any ambition to serve more than two terms or the entire period until 2020 and be in a position to declare that Malaysia is already a developed country.

"(But) I expect continuity (on) most of the things I have already started," he said.

A report on the initiatives and achievements of the government from November 2003 to March 2009 produced by the Prime Minister's Deparment were circulated to the media later.

Abdullah was surprised when asked about his plan to live in a kampung-style house with a "perigi" (well) after his retirement.

"How did you know? There's a well but it's not deep," he said.

Abdullah also described the outcomes of the 2004 and 2008 general elections as his greatest and worst achievements.

Abdullah, who is the Barisan Nasional chairman, led the coalition to its best-ever victory in March 2004 after being sworn in as the fifth prime minister in October 2003, sweeping 199 of the 219 parliamentary seats.

However, the ruling coalition lost for the first time in 39 years its two-third majority in Parliament in March last year and lost control of four state governments.

Asked whether his relationship with Dr Mahathir would have been better if the government had not scrapped the plans to build the "crooked bridge" to replace the Johor Causeway, Abdullah said he did not have a pre-conceived idea on the matter before the decision was made to stop the project.

"We had to consider it...I didn't have a pre-conceived idea about it...that I was going to stop it.

"This is one issue that has been brought up to the Cabinet time and again," he said, adding that the economy was in deficit during that time.

Abdullah also said that he had no regrets for promoting openness and freedom during his tenure, but he warned that there must limitations.

"There must be some moral limits...or you will be creating a lot of problems...creating anarchy. There must be self-control," he said.

Everyone must think before raising an issue openly because "everyone has feelings and there are things that we must not bring up".

Tamil Tiger leader no-surrender vow nears last test

Sri Lankan soldiers patrol in a lagoon in Mullaitivu last week. The noose is tightening around the LTTE as their area of control shrinks by the day. - Reuters pic

COLOMBO, March 31 — Tamil Tiger founder Vellupillai Prabhakaran has done one thing better than anything else for 37 years: avoid capture.

Now the 54-year-old guerrilla leader and architect of Asia’s longest-running civil war faces near certain defeat at the hands of the Sri Lankan military, and his longstanding vow of no surrender appears near a final test.

For once since he first got the authorities’ attention after accidentally setting off explosives in 1972, there is little doubt about the elusive Tiger chief’s whereabouts.

In a rare moment of agreement between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and Sri Lanka’s military, both say he is in the 25-square km (10-sq mile) war zone — all that remains of Prabhakaran’s goal of a separate nation for Sri Lanka’s Tamils.

“We still believe that he is there,” military spokesman Brigadier Udaya Nanayakkara said. Refugees reported Prabhakaran and his son, Charles Anthony, had sporadically emerged from bunkers to speak with civilians, the spokesman said.

On March 22, LTTE political head B. Nadesan told India’s CNN-IBN network in an email interview: “I can confirm that our leader is here with our people as always.”

Much of how the war plays out, and how tens of thousands of civilians trapped by the LTTE inside a military-declared no-fire zone fare, depends on the fate of a man wanted by Interpol and blamed for scores of assassinations and suicide bombings.

A United Nations assessment given to diplomats at a March 9 briefing spelled out five possible end-game scenarios, and listed Prabhakaran and other leaders surviving inside the no-fire zone as “the most critical for humanitarian conditions”.

“It is unlikely that they will give up ... (They) will either try to escape or fight a last stand with potentially devastating consequences for civilians should the government not restrain its forces,” a copy of the UN assessment obtained by Reuters says.

Already, the world body has accused the LTTE of keeping civilians as human shields and forced conscripts, and of shooting those trying to flee. It also accuses Sri Lanka’s military of killing civilians in shelling. Both sides deny the accusations.

That Prabhakaran is facing a final showdown is a marked turnaround for a man who had just a few years ago owned a reputation as a ruthless tactician who killed his enemies before they became threats and commanded a fanatically loyal army.

In his annual speech in November, he said Sri Lanka’s military was “in a dreamland” if it thought it would win a war which erupted in earnest in 1983. But in quick succession, Sri Lanka’s military has penned in and destroyed most of the LTTE.

“Assuming the story is going from bad to worse and worse as seems is happening for Prabhakaran now, the only choice I see is the man dying in some form,” said M.R. Narayan Swamy, author of the Prabhakaran biography “Inside an Elusive Mind”.

Escape or surrender is out of the question for a man whose followers are willing to commit suicide for the cause and wear cyanide capsules to be taken in case of capture, Swamy said.

“His dying for the cause will help the cult, the personality, to live on for a long time. If he were to run away or withdraw, the cult would die,” Swamy said.

Prabhakaran is most often pictured in his trademark Tiger stripe camouflage along with men and women he has sent to their deaths. Regular use of suicide bombs — a tactic the LTTE arguably pioneered — put it on US, EU and Indian terrorist lists.

Prabhakaran has been sentenced in absentia to 200 years in prison for the 1996 bombing of Sri Lanka’s central bank, and is wanted by India for ordering the 1991 suicide bombing that killed former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa has said Prabhakaran would be sent to prison if caught, but few expect to see him behind bars.

Prabhakaran since the war started has been clear about his plans in case of defeat.

“I would prefer to die in honour rather than being caught alive by the enemy,” he said in his first interview, published in India’s Sunday magazine in 1984. — Reuters

Tuesday, 31 March 2009

Dr M - from London with spite

On Saturday in Kuala Lumpur. J

MCPX
ust before the curtain fell on the 59th Umno general assembly, the party's 83-year-old former president made a grand entrance with his wife in tow.

Looking debonair in a neatly-pressed deep purple stripped shirt and black slacks, Dr Mahathir Mohamad was given a rapturous welcome by the Umno leaders and delegates alike.

After all, Mahathir and his wife Dr Siti Hasmah Ali are the two pioneer party members bearing the respective membership numbers '000001' and '000002' of Umno Baru - the party born out of the 1987 crisis which saw the original Umno being declared illegal.

najib mahathir pak lah umno 2009 agm final day 280309 10It was a night of love, apparently masterminded by newly-minted Umno president Najib Abdul Razak to bring his mentor and outgoing premier Abdullah Ahmad Badawi together.

Mahathir, who looked the sharpest of the lot on stage, awkwardly embraced Abdullah whom he had been attacking incessantly since a year after he had handpicked him as his successor in 2003.

mahathir pak lah reunion at umno agm 2009 280309It was a scene that surely deserved an Oscar nomination and one that made headlines the next day. The hatchet had purportedly been buried.

Overwhelmed with emotion, Najib said he hoped Mahathir and Abdullah would together guide him through his tenure at the helm and offer him ideas for his unenviable task of rebuilding the party.

Mahathir who quit Umno last May in protest of Abdullah's leadership also vowed to return to the fold soon.

Unfortunately, the dream was short-lived.

From London with spite

Fast forward to Monday in London. The former premier again let loose his stinging criticisms of his successor-turned-nemesis Abdullah.

In an interview with BBC, he shreds, rips and slams his successor for sullying his legacy.

"Everything went rotten" after Abdullah became prime minister, lamented Mahathir who refused to acknowledge any shortcomings on his part for the problems in Umno despite being asked several times.

Moving on to another one of his favourite targets, Mahathir fired several rounds at Abdullah's son-in-law and newly-elected Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin.

He said both father-in-law and son-in-law had worked together to hatch a new set of policies and "everything went wrong when Abdullah took over..."

Mahathir's vexation towards Khairy escalated last week when the latter defeated his son, Mukhriz, in the covetted Umno Youth chief contest.

khairy jamaluddin umno youth chief 250309In a hard-hitting blog posting later, Mahathir - who during his 22-year tenure was accused of everything in the dictionary related to corruption - slammed the Umno Youth movement for bringing shame on the party by endorsing a 'corrupt' leader.

However, Mahathir was magnanimous enough to concede in the BBC interview to having committed one mistake - picking Abdullah as his successor.

He said that in 22 years in office, Barisan Nasional always won two-thirds control in Parliament but the last polls saw the ruling coalition suffering its worst ever setback, by not only losing its two-third majority but also several states.

It is this which increased the pressure on the premier to relinquish the reins although his term does not end until 2013.

Ironically four years earlier, Abdullah secured the biggest ever mandate for BN, seizing control of 90 percent of the parliamentary seats.

Mahathir appeared to claim some credit for the historic mandate in 2004, noting that the general elections had come just after he stepped down as prime minister.

But observers had pointed out then that it was precisely Mahathir's exit coupled with his successor's reform pledges had led to the boost in support.

Earth Hour KL 2009 @ CapSquare

Bukit Selambau Indian votes may shift, but not by enough

By Shannon Teoh- The Malaysian Insider

SUNGAI PETANI, March 31 – Amid escalating worries over Indian voters in Bukit Selambau, de facto PKR leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is making it his first stop in the ongoing triple by-elections campaign.

He is also due to meet the local election team late tonight to address the level of unrest on the ground.

Indian splinters within PKR Kedah look set to cost it a number of votes for the Bukit Selambau by-election.

To listen to the talk out there, it would appear that PKR Kedah is crumbling in the midst of the Bukit Selambau by-election.

Three former PKR members are contesting the seat, an entire division has left the party, and sources say seven others are contemplating a similar move.

Even Hindraf, instrumental in denying BN 80 per cent of the Indian votes here in last March’s general election, have been reluctant to back the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) campaign.

But prevailing over this is a persistent perception that Barisan Nasional (BN) has oppressed Indians who are being told that S. Manikumar will be able to address their woes directly as he will be made a state executive councillor should he triumph on April 7.

The cause of dissension, agreed on by both party leaders and those outside, is unhappiness at the choice of Manikumar as PKR’s candidate.

But where opinions differ, is what sort of effect it will have on over 11,000 Indian voters here, who are seen as crucial given the belief that the Malay vote is split between Umno and Pas in the state seat with 35,140 voters.

B. Kalaivanar’s move to pull his 357-strong Jerai division out may have been the most stunning piece of news coming out of Bukit Selambau in the 48 hours since nominations.

Kalaivanar and a few aspiring candidates had been rejected after a selection process by PKR that finally picked the political novice from a list of 21 candidates.

They say the interview process was a sham and that Manikumar was earmarked the moment V. Arumugam had vacated the seat on Feb 8 and cite this as the latest in PKR Kedah’s political power play.

“He definitely cannot do anything for the Indians here and is just a donkey for Pas,” said Kalaivanar, echoing independent candidate and former Pokok Sena chief S. Jayagopal, who had accused PKR Kedah of choosing a puppet candidate.

MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu also alluded to this as he expressed his belief that Indian votes were swinging back towards even parity.

“The Pas government has given the seat to PKR, not to an Indian, and PKR does not understand the feeling of Indians,” he said.

He also noted that PKR needed the Pas machinery to win the seat and would cede to its demands.

Speaking to The Malaysian Insider, PKR strategist Saifuddin Nasution claims that these disgruntled voices were surfacing simply due to their desire to be candidates and did not reflect a deeper problem in the party’s state leadership.

The Machang MP said that after all, Jerai and Pokok Sena were not within Bukit Selambau, so the net effect was minimal.

“If you take all the reports of members leaving over the past few years seriously, then there would be no members left in the party,” he quipped.

The Pakatan Rakyat (PR) election strategist in charge of Bukit Selambau claimed that he was still being asked to provide speakers for an average of 47 ceramahs per night in Bukit Selambau, mostly from rural Indian areas.

“There is a continued willingness by our grassroots machinery to work, so there is no question of division within the ranks,” he said.

Analysts also believe that the independent candidates may be able to pool about 500 votes between them but bringing Indian voters back to BN is a different proposition altogether.

Samy Vellu still leading MIC has, in fact, sent the message that BN has not changed and the carrot of an exco place overrides the question of internal squabbling.

So what if the interview process was a front? So what if PKR Kedah’s leadership have been manipulative?

In the final analysis, Manikumar is still a PKR candidate who will toe the party line of racial equity.

Requesting foreign interference on Malaysian Indians genocide issue before rice becomes porridge.

Saravanan Pitchan
2018 Antwerpen .
Belgium 30th March, 2009

President of USA
Mr. Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Mr .Gordon Brown
10 Downing Street,
London,SW1A 2AA
England

Ref: Requesting foreign interference on Malaysian Indians genocide issue before rice becomes porridge.

Dear Sir,

Please accept my best wishes and greetings.

Hope this letter meets you in a good health and pleasant day.

Hereby I'm humbly requesting the USA, Great Britain and the rest of the world to review the systematic Malaysian Indian genocide in Malaysia.

There are uncountable issues which I can address in this official letter but to make it short and clear, I would like to refer to the latest issues which made

Malaysian Indians uproaring.

a) On Jan 15th 2009 Kugan Ananthan aged 22 was detained.

Crime : suspected involvement in an international car theft syndicate.

On Jan 20th 2009 The young man was killed under police custody.

11 Police officers where involved in that killing. Even the attorney general of police classified it as a murder. All those police officers who were involved in the murder are transferred to a better position in Police HQ in Kuala Lumpur. Until today the police didn’t prove his crime. The state Selangor police chief said "During interrogation, the man asked for a glass of water and upon drinking the water, he collapsed and lost consciousness. To reveal the truth of this incident, I would like to refer to some facts which were saved in following websites:

-(http://national-express-malaysia.blogspot.com/2009/01/man-dies-during-po...)

_(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wG5pCqncII&eurl=http://malaysiaindianabu...)

b) On Feb 19th 2009 , 6 suspected as armed robbers were shot dead by police, none of the persons that were shot survived to be arrested and charged. "When the policemen barged into the house and introduced themselves, six men between the age of 20 and 50, fired several shots at them, and in defence, the police fired back and the shots hit the six suspects," .

After doing an investigation by local politicians and human rights lawyers, none of them were criminal. Till today no evidence were tabled. The police shot them to protect themselves from the suspects.

Now the question rises: were they really armed? Why police officers were not hurt? Among these six men, one was an handicapped boy and according to one of the parents, another one was just back from pilgrimage in India. If the police really wants to prove that they are robbers, why didn’t the police officers try to arrest them or try to shoot them in their hand or leg?

As a prove of this incident I would like to give a link which was published in a blog:

-(http://national-express-malaysia.blogspot.com/2009/02/six-shot-dead-in-k...)

-(http://national-express-malaysia.blogspot.com/2009/02/kulim-shootout-ful...)

Our Indians in Malaysia have been again and again systematically killed by the police in Malaysia. We, as an ordinary citizen and marginalized community of Malaysia, are simply begging to foreign countries to uphold human rights in Malaysia.

This is not the first incident, but some of the reports were saved in:

http://malaysiaindianabused.blogspot.com/

I have no words to mention about our problems. Most of the Indians in Malaysia are considering all those issues as Malaysian Indian genocide. Where can we go?

What can we do with the systematic police terrorizing us, lead by the UMNO government ?

In many countries, UN and American coalition, are sending troops when the country is in real problem and when there is chaos. Why don’t the UN or other powerful countries in the world help the needy before the rice becomes porridge?

UN human rights council, America Human rights council, EU parliament Human rights council, Amnesty and so on is watching Malaysia closely, but most of the time all these organizations are writing letters and trying to help in a common way but it isn’t really an effective one for a country like Malaysia. My only hope is that all foreign countries take initiative to correct their egos and let us live happily in our birth place.

Yours Faithfully,

Saravanan Pitchan

Cc: Amnesty International

1 Easton Street
London
WC1X 0DW, UK

Cc: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
Palais Wilson
52 rue des Pâquis
CH-1201 Geneva, Switzerland

Cc: EU Human Rights Council

Hans-Gert Pöttering
President of the European Parliament

Brussels, Belgium

Anwar Expects Further Crackdowns Under New Malaysian Leader

By James Hookway (The Wall Street Journal)

BANGKOK – Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim on Monday again warned that the imminent rise to power of rival Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak will likely provoke a further crackdown on popular dissent in the economically struggling Southeast Asian nation.

Speaking in an interview with The Wall Street Journal in Bangkok, Mr. Anwar said: "I think we can clearly see a trend developing. Already we can see what Mr. Najib's rule will be like."

In the past week, Malaysian authorities have shut down two opposition-run newspapers, effectively preventing them from reporting on the run-up to three by-elections on April 7, which will provide a partial test of Mr. Najib's national support. On Monday, policed seized DVDs the opposition was using as part of its election campaign, and last week riot police used teargas and water cannons to prevent Mr. Anwar from addressing his supporters.

Mr. Najib will likely become premier in the next few days after current Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi hands in his resignation to Malaysia's king on April 2. Already a war of words is emerging with Mr. Anwar, arguably Mr. Najib's most potent foe after the opposition alliance broke the ruling National Front's customary two-thirds majority in elections last year.

Their deepening struggle threatens to overshadow the Malaysian government's efforts to offset its steepest recession since the Asian financial crisis of the 1990s. Some economists predict the economy could contract by as much as 4% this year.

The government this month unveiled a $16.7 billion stimulus package to be spent over the next two years.

In addition to the newspaper closures -- which will be in effect for three months, according to the Malaysian government -- several senior members of the ruling National Front coalition have also accused Mr. Anwar of betraying his race for supporting the scrapping of Malaysia's decades-old affirmative action policies which were introduced to ensure economic and political power for Malaysia's majority Muslim ethnic Malay population.

Mr. Anwar is a Malay, but argues that the New Economic Policy, as the affirmative action program is known, has rendered Malaysia's economy uncompetitive and will likely limit the country's recovery from the global slump.

"What I argue is that we should help all the races equally so we can take favoritism out of the equation," Mr. Anwar said. "I think we're going to hear more about racial issues if the economic situation continues."

In addition, Malaysian riot police have forcibly broken up two opposition rallies in the past several days, raising concerns among political analysts that Mr. Najib intends to steer Malaysia back to the authoritarian ways espoused by its former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who ruled Malaysia for 22 years before stepping down in 2003.

Mr. Anwar has been distracted by legal issues after a former aide accused him of sodomy, which is a crime in Malaysia. Mr. Anwar, who was convicted and then acquitted of the same crime after challenging the government in 1998, says he is innocent and his being framed by Mr. Najib's operatives.

Mr. Najib has repeatedly said he has nothing to do with Mr. Anwar's legal troubles. On Saturday he denied that he was stamping out opposition dissent.

Batang Ai, Bukit Gantang & Bukit Selambau by-elections : Barisan Rakyat sms campaign

by Haris Ibrahim

Don’t imagine even for one moment that SPR’s decision to fix all three by-elections simultaneously was an independent decision, without any consideration of the best interests of their political masters.

It’s to stretch the resources of the Pakatan Rakyat to breaking point.

But there’s one resource that Pakatan has that BN cannot break.

You and I.

We are beyond the reach of BN.

And Pakatan need us now, more than ever.

I’ll be in Bukit Gantang / Bukit Selambau for the better part of the campaign period as well as on polling day.

You can help, too, from wherever you are.

We start our Barisan Rakyat sms campaign today.

First we want to alert the people of Batang Ai, Bukit Gantang and Bukit Selambau that we, the rakyat have rejected the race-based politics of BN. We want them to know that we, a nation of a single people, anak Bangsa Malaysia, have rejected BN and its race-based divide and rule politics and have embraced the ‘ketuanan rakyat’ slogan of Pakatan Rakyat.

Here is the first sms.

Rakyat menolak politik kaum UMNO / BN. Politik kaum UMNO / BN hancurkan perpaduan rakyat. Jangan diperdayakan dengan politik kaum UMNO / BN. Politik Pakatan Rakyat menyatukan rakyat. Rakyat sehati sejiwa menyelamatkan negara yang dicintai. Undilah PAS / PKR pada 7/4/2009. Hidup rakyat. Sebar kpd kwn2 di Btg Ai / Bkt Gantang / Bkt Selambau

Next, we are going to wage war with the lying mainstream media who will be telling all sorts of lies in the next week. Whilst those of us who will be out on the campaign trail will try to do what we can to neutralise this spin-doctoring by the MSM, again our outreach will not be able to match a full-blown sms campaign to alert the people to the lies that will be spread through the MSM.

Here is the ‘boycott the MSM’ sms.

Media massa arus p’dana akan m’perdayakan rkyt & m’cari helah utk gagalkan PAS di Bkt Gantang dan PKR di Btg Ai / Bkt Selambau dgn berita palsu - utk menanam rasa syak wasangka terhadap PAS & PKR. Jom boikot! Jgn beli s/kabar. Jgn p’caya berita radio/TV. Sebarkan kpd kwn2 di Bkt Gantang / Btg Ai / Bkt Selambau .

Could anyone please translate these 2 sms’s into Chinese / Tamil and send it in to me as a comment so that I can then put it up here, please?

Send these sms’s out to everyone you know in Sarawak / Perak / Kedah. Even if you do not know anyone in these three states or the constituencies in question, send them out to those whom you know with a request that they forward it to those whom they know. That way, there’s every likelihood that it will ultimately get to the good folk of in these three constituencies in due course. And keep sending the sms’s out again and again in the run-up to polling day on 7th April.

NAJIB TO BE SWORN IN AS PRIME MINISTER ON 3 APRIL 2009

Outgoing Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi revealed during a press conference at the close of the UMNO General Assembly that he will have an audience with the Yang DiPertuan Agong on 2 April 2009 to express his desire to step down as Malaysia's 5th Prime Minister, making way for Deputy Prime Minister and new UMNO President Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak to succeed him.

The Opposition and certain groups have been reporting that Datuk Seri Najib is involved in the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu which of late have been widely reported overseas after a report from a French daily, which clearly undermines his reputation and credibility while the Opposition is proposing that a Royal Commission of Inquiry should be established to make a finding whether Datuk Seri Najib is involved or not although repeatedly Datuk Seri Najib had indicated that he does not know her.

There are reports that the Istana Negara has plans to have the inaugural ceremony of appointing a new prime minister on 3 April 2009.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah who was pressured to reveal the date of transition by reporters were only offered a reply that it would happen "in due course".

news n picture courtesy of Agendadaily

I am no stumbling block in Bukit Selambau

By : Suganthi Supramaniam
NST, March 30 2009
SUNGAI PETANI, Mon:

MIC chief Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu is here in Sungai Petani and supervising the campaign for his party man, Datuk V. Ganesan. For the last 20 days he has parked himself here to ensure the BN and Ganesan emerged victorious on April 7. Suganthi Supramaniam spoke exclusively to the MIC supremo who shattered a claim here that Samy Vellu is not welcomed by local BN leaders.



Is it true that UMNO Kedah is not happy with you being here?

No. They are happy. Kedah UMNO are very pleasant people. They have called me, invited me for tea and also asked me to speak. If they are unhappy with me, we will lose the by-election.

Do you see yourself as a stumbling block to BN and MIC?

No. If I had not come here, the environment would be different. The people will still be anti-BN. The people here love to see us again and again.
Why Ganesan?

He is young, well known and experienced. He was also the former Lunas state assemblyman. He was not fielded in the last general election because at that time a lot of other youngsters had wanted to contest

There is talk that Ganesan is not well liked here by the Kedah MIC. Your comment.

Whenever you put a candidate, you will not get 100 per cent acceptance. It is like a arranged marriage, at first you don't like the bride chosen by the father, but slowly you will and will even have four or five children. Ganesan is new and has a pleasant face. Face is the mirror of the heart.

Are you aware that Pakatan Rakyat is trying to dig up dirt on Ganesan?

Let them. We can also dig up Anwar’s (Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) past. If Ganesan does not have good record, then neither has Anwar. It takes a thief to call another a thief.

Earlier you were talking about fielding Datuk V. Saravanan. What happened?

Even though I was talking about Saravanan and he can also speak the local dialect, I had Ganesan in mind. But the age of the other candidate came into consideration and that’s why we choose Ganesan.

Is it true that there is a lack of talent in Kedah MIC?

No. We have people likes S. Krishnan (former candidate), we have graduates with masters and doctors. By-elections are more difficult and challenging than general elections and we needed someone with the quality, talent and experience of working with the people.

What will happen if MIC loses this time?

I don’t want to talk about losing, only wining and winning. I am a winner, even from those days when I was a cook, telephone operator or office boy. (He was in good mood yesterday morning. His car number 1818 came out in Toto. Starter. He said he did not buy)

What is your reading on Bukit Selambau?

BN can be confident that the votes are returning. Minds are changing. They know where their future lies, whom they can rely upon, that they need a steady government and that steady government is the BN. Astrologically, 2008 was a bad year for Indians where a lot of political calamity took place. But, 2009 will be a good year for them with BN having a deeper look and doing the necessary for them.

What are the issues here?

We have welfare issues and the Social Security Organisation (Socso) is among the biggest problems here. We also have people with medical problems, and people with low income and unable to take care of their families.

The Cost Of Politics

The UMNO Assembly has come and gone and, as has been the case for at least the last three assemblies, in its wake many of us have been left uneasy and in a state of disquiet. Seeing the inner workings of the Leviathan’s mind is never an easy thing, even at the best of times. And these really are the worst of times.

Power-lust has put a debilitating strain on our national institutions; they are in the mind of the public nothing more than lifeless marionettes in a caricature of democracy. The accumulation of money and influence has for some time now been the greater social good in the minds of many of those who claim the right to lead us. Governance has been wholly enslaved to the perverse politics required to feed this monstrous craving.

One does not have to go to great lengths anymore to demonstrate these conclusions. After this last assembly, it is a matter of public record. Reading the speeches made, I was struck by how for many of those who attended the assembly there is no other way other than the UMNO way that they are familiar with: exclusive privilege through patronage.

While it could be said that these are matters concerning the internal workings of UMNO and as such really none of my business, this cannot be the case when UMNO stakes a claim on the premiership of this nation as it does. The Federal Constitution does not provide that the President of UMNO must be the Prime Minister. That is however the understanding within the Barisan whose component parties are compelled to leave the choice of that individual to UMNO’s admittedly skewed method of electing its President.

This state of affairs is made more complex by the expectation on the part of UMNO that it is entitled to govern this nation, a viewpoint it gives life to through its control over the wider system of governance. The experience of the rakyat with matters of state has been a disappointing one and the general belief is that all constitutional bodies and agencies of the state will act to further the interests of UMNO and, where interests overlap, the Barisan.

Seen in this light, the internal workings of UMNO are a matter of national concern; the national interest underscoring the appointment of a Prime Minister is ultimately left vulnerable to those who are able to successfully wield influence at the UMNO Assembly.

As I have written elsewhere, this is not the scheme envisaged by the founders of the Federal Constitution, which instead puts in place an appointment process grounded on His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong’s judgment as to who it is that commands the confidence of the majority of members of the Dewan Rakyat.

For many in UMNO and the Barisan however, political convention must trump constitutionalism. Both the party and the coalition have made this clear in the way in which concerns over the appropriateness of Datuk Seri Najib Razak as Prime Minister are being avoided.

This cannot be right, the unease that the failure to take appropriate steps to clear the air has given rise to is no small matter. It pertains directly to public confidence in the due administration of this nation. If the positions were reversed, the same rationale would apply: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim would not be an appropriate candidate until the accusation of sodomy by Saiful Bukhari was dealt with.

Public confidence is crucial to our survival. We are a nation in crisis facing external challenges of great magnitude. Part of the reason for this is the sustained maladministration that we have had to endure over a prolonged period of time. Put bluntly, the nation is not firing on all pistons and we are not nearly as prepared or resourced to deal with what we will have to be when the full significance of world events hits us.

The choice of Prime Minister at this point is a crucial one. In addition to addressing Malaysia’s response to the global economic crisis and its impact on the rakyat, the next administration must address two objectives that are vital to our continued survival. The first of these is the serious deficiencies in our current process of general and state elections. These go deeper than the issue of perceived Election Commission and Police bias to the more fundamental question of whether democratic purpose is being achieved through a first-past-the-post system and the “weighted” delineation of constituencies. Electoral ethics must also be made a priority with scrutiny of the continued value of racial ideologies that serve no purpose than to divide us. True democratic process is the only way in which this nation can ensure that it remains competitive.

Secondly, the foundations of governance must be shored up. The doctrine of separation of powers must be re-entrenched to ensure the due application of checks and balances. For this, reforms must be carried out at more than a superficial level. For this to occur, constitutionalism must be breathed into the organs and agencies of state once more. The Judiciary must be liberated from any and all political influence and be made as capable as it once was, with public confidence in the institution. The legislatures of the nation must be allowed to return to previous glory when debates were permitted without fear or favour and the legislative chamber served a purpose higher than rubber-stamping the dictates of majoritarianism.

Above all, the Executive must be made accountable once again.

This is what we need if we do not want to see this nation failing. Momentum however threatens to propel us forward in that direction. The brakes need to be applied and our direction changed, impelled forward by the will of the rakyat with the Federal Constitution serving as our roadmap.

The question we must confront is who it is that will be able to lead us in doing that.

If I wonder whether Datuk Seri Najib considers himself capable of doing this, it is because he has said precious little to suggest that he has considered the precarious situation we are in. I am also wary of the political forces that paved his way to the top that will impede him much in the same way as they did the out-going Prime Minister. There is also the matter of public sentiment concerning various matters that he either has been, or is seen to have been, involved in.

Ironically, the one person in UMNO who holds to a need for serious reform at all levels, Tengku Razaleigh, received only one nomination and could not contest the presidency. This was an error on the part of UMNO in my view.

My fear is that the nation will have to pay the price.

Malik Imtiaz Sarwar is the current President of the National Human Rights Society (HAKAM) and a lawyer. He has been at the forefront of efforts aimed at promoting constitutionalism and the Rule of Law. His blog ‘Disquiet’, and weekly column of the same name with the Malay Mail, are widely read

(Malaysian Insider 31st March 2009)

Malik Imtiaz Sarwar

By-elections not a referendum on Najib's leadership: Muhyiddin

ImageThe Sun

SUNGAI PETANI (March 30, 2009) : Umno deputy president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has urged the people not to make the three by-elections on April 7 a referendum on the new Umno and Barisan Nasional (BN) leadership of Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said the by-elections at Bukit Gantang in Perak, Bukit Selambau in Kedah and Batang Ai in Sarawak are significant as coincidentally, they will be held soon after the transition of power.

"I like to remind voters that they are by-elections, not a referendum on Datuk Seri Najib's leadership," he told reporters after a briefing on the BN election machinery at Merbok near here today.

Muhyiddin said voters should consider the future and efforts being taken to improve policies aimed at developing the country without neglecting any race.

"We want to implement more effective social programmes fast. We begin by having a new leadership," Bernama reported him as saying.

Muhyiddin also called on the voters of Bukit Selambau to vote for BN-MIC candidate Datuk S. Ganesan if they are not satisfied with the former Pakatan Rakyat state government here.

"The voters should take heed of what has happened within the PR state government here and it is time to show displeasure over what has happened by voting for the BN," he said.

He added that Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) has no clear ideology, and if its candidate S. Manikumar were to be voted as the state assemblyman, he might quit and run away from his responsiblity, like what the former assemblyman V. Arumugam did.

"Ganesan has the credentials, unlike PKR who has no commitment," he said.

Muhyiddin added that BN has prepared its machinery to campaign for Ganesan in this by-election. "This will not be easy to win, but we have certain strategies to win."

He said the machinery will focus on getting to know all voters in Bukit Selambau.

Muhyiddin said based on a field survey, 50% of the voters here want change. "This is a good sign. Now, we just need one percent to win!"

Asked to comment on the number of candidates contesting in this by-election, Muyhiddin said the number of candidates was extraordinary.

"But this will not really affect the chances for BN ," he said, adding that the independents are self-centered and do not have a clear struggle. "None of them are expected to win, it is a waste of their time."

Muhyiddin added if any of the independents are BN candidates, they would automatically have their membership terminated.

Najib It Is

Malaysia's leading ethnic party names a scandal-ridden party hack as its head and the country's leader
Image

On Friday, Malaysia is scheduled to end months of waiting to announce its new prime minister, Najib Tun Razak, after the United Malays National Organisation, the country's biggest ethnic party named him their leader during their annual convention.

Najib told the UMNO parley, held in Kuala Lumpur last week, that it is crucial that his party reform itself or it will lose its hold on the electorate. But Najib's history, and that of the party itself, portends instead a return to the politics and practices that got the national ruling coalition into trouble in the first place, losing its historic two-thirds majority in the national parliament in national elections last year. Najib's ascent to power more likely represents a clear preference by UMNO stalwarts to return to cronyism, money politics and corruption after an eight-year interregnum from the authoritarian reign of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.

The new prime minister's history may make it problematical whether the leaders of major countries are going to want to be seen with him. Concerns include hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable contracts steered to UMNO cronies and friends, not to mention continuing allegations of his involvement in the murder of the Mongolian translator Altantuya Shaariibuu following the controversial purchase of French submarines and, more recently, his role in sabotaging the opposition in the state of Perak and his shuttering newspapers and thwarting opposition candidates during his own party's elections last week.

The convention itself was a good example. Opponents of the Najib team were denied places on the ballot by a panel supposedly charged with cleaning up money politics, although they let Najib's allies slide by after having committed the same offenses. The result was that the deputy president, Muhyiddin Yassin, and all three vice presidents are from the Najib faction although the Najib forces were unable to prevent Khairy Jamaluddin, the son-in-law of ousted Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmand Badawi, from becoming head of the important UMNO Youth wing. They also were unable to stop Shahrizat Abdul Jalil from defeating longtime party hack Rafidah Aziz to take over the Wanita, the women's wing of the party, also a Badawi ally.

The final election night erupted into name-calling, with allies of Mukhriz Mahathir, the son of the former prime minister, charging that Khairy had bought the votes to make him head of UMNO Youth. Mahathir Mohamad himself railed against the two candidates against his son, calling them corrupt. Rais Yatim, the foreign minister, who lost out in one of the vice president races, demanded that UMNO's disciplinary board investigate the entire new supreme council over allegations that they had delivered gifts and money to delegates in the effort to win their seats. Mahathir Mohamad has repeatedly launched furious attacks on UMNO leaders, calling them corrupt although he showed up at the last night of the convention to be seen with Najib and others.

The UMNO-owned New Straits Times described the top party positions as having "given much-needed breathing space to Najib as he sets out to unite UMNO and push the party to undertake the reforms he has promised. He will have less of a task to deal with the factionalism that so often arises after a bitterly fought contest in the party." But in fact, UMNO appears to be as much riven by factional politics as it was going into the convention.

As early as April 8, the party faces the first of three important by-elections – one for a seat in the Dewan Rakyat, or national assembly, and two more for state legislative seats. The first test is for a Perak seat in which support for the Barisan appears to be waning.

"The problem is not the opposition, but within our own ranks," a local leader told the Kuala Lumpur-based website Malaysia Insider, referring to the perennial problem of factionalism within Umno.

Najib has sought to nullify the opposition with force. Last Monday, a rally led by Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim was broken up by police who fired tear gas at the audience. Other rallies have been cancelled as well. Two opposition newspapers were cancelled until after April 8, the date of the Perak national by-election, presumably because the two papers have hammered away at allegations of Najib's connections with the two men on trial for killing Altantuya in October of 2006 and her role in the €1 billion purchase of French submarines that netted one of his closest friends €114 million in "commissions."

To say Najib brings considerable baggage with him is an understatement. While attention has focused on allegations of corruption in the submarine purchases, the fact is that as defense minister from 1999 to 2008, Najib presided over a cornucopia of defense deals that poured a river of money into the coffers of his close friends and UMNO cronies. A September 24, 2007 story in Asia Sentinel quoted Foreign Policy in Focus, a think tank supported by the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, as saying that "many foreign arms manufacturers generally used well-connected Malaysians as their lobbyists for contracts."

Three contracts approved under Najib have been widely cited by the opposition and fit well into Foreign in Policy in Focus's patronage scale. They have been forced back into public attention by his ascension to the premiership and by the exoneration under questionable circumstances of Abdul Razak Baginda, one of his closest friends, for Altantuya's murder.

Spending for defense accelerated across the board after Najib, called "the driving force" behind Malaysia's military modernization program by Foreign Policy in Focus. The shopping list, the think tank reported, "includes battle tanks from Poland, Russian and British surface-to-air missiles and mobile military bridges, Austrian Steyr assault rifles and Pakistani anti-tank missiles. Kuala Lumpur was also negotiating to buy several F/A 18s, the three French submarines and Russian Suhkoi Su-30 fighter aircraft.


It was the Sukhois that, after the French submarines, became the second controversial purchase brokered by Najib. The deal, worth US$900 million (RM3.2 billion), was through a Russian state company, Federal State Unitary Enterprise 'Rosoboronexport' on May 19, 2003. A company called IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd. was appointed the local agent for the Russian company and received 12 percent of the purchase price, US$108 million (RM380 million). The principal figure and chairman of IMT Defence is Mohamad Adib Adam, the former chief minister of Malacca, the previous Land and Development Minister and a longtime UMNO stalwart.

The involvement of IMT Defence only became known because in March 2005, a former director of IMT, Mohamad Zainuri Mohamad Idrus, filed suit against several Adib-related companies, alleging that Adib and his sister, Askiah Adam, "wanted to prevent him from exposing the reality of the Sukhoi deal." In 2006, Mohamad Zainuri lodged a police report alleging that Adib had stolen the US$108 million (RM 380 million) commission that was supposed to be channeled to the company.

According to Mohamad Zainuri's report, Adib had secretly registered a new company in the federal island of Labuan, Malaysia's offshore banking center, bearing a name similar to IMT Defence Sdn Bhd, allegedly in order to channel the commission illegally to the new company. The report was then sent to the Commercial Crime Investigations Department Headquarters. No report, however, has ever been released to the public.

Then, in late 2007, a third military scandal surfaced. Malaysia's Auditor General, in a report tabled in Parliament on September 7, alleged that a contract to build naval vessels given to PSC-Naval Dockyard, a subsidiary of Penang Shipbuilding & Construction Sdn Bhd, which is owned by another UMNO crony, Amin Shah Omar Shah, was near failure.

PSC-Naval Dockyard was contracted to deliver six patrol boats for the Malaysian Navy in 2004 and complete the delivery by last April. Those were supposed to be the first of 27 offshore vessels ultimately to cost RM24 billion plus the right to maintain and repair all of the country's naval craft. But only two of the barely operational patrol boats had been delivered by mid 2006. There were 298 recorded complaints about the two boats, which were also found to have 100 and 383 uncompleted items aboard them respectively.

The original RM5.35 billion contract ballooned to RM6.75 billion by January 2007. The auditor also reported that the ministry had paid out Rm4.26 billion to PSC up to December 2006 although only Rm2.87 billion of work had been done, an overpayment of Rm1.39 billion, or 48 percent. In addition, Malaysia's cabinet waived late penalties of Rm214 million. Between December 1999, according to the Auditor General, 14 "progress payments" amounting to Rm943 million despite the fact that the auditor general could find no payment vouchers or relevant documents dealing with the payments.

The auditor general attributed the failure to serious financial mismanagement and technical incompetence stemming from the fact that PSC had never built anything but trawlers or police boats before being given the contract. Once called "Malaysia's Onassis" by former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, Amin Shah was in trouble almost from the start, according to a report in Singapore's Business Times in 2005. The financial crisis of 1997-1998 meant he was desperate to find funds to shore up ancillary businesses, Business times reported.

After a flock of lawsuits, the government ultimately cut off funding in 2004 amid losses and a net liabilities position. Boustead Holdings effectively took control from Amin Shah, reducing him to non-executive chairman.

"The scandal [over Altantuya's murder] is bringing shame to the nation and damaging our international credibility," said former finance minister and longtime politician Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah. "For the honor of the nation, for the honor of the office of prime minister, for the honor of the sovereign institutions expected to endorse, confirm and lend authority to him should he become prime minister according to Umno's plans, Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak should finally face these suspicions and implied charges, submit himself to legal scrutiny, and come clean on them."

"Swearing on the Al-Quran is not the way out," Razaleigh continued. "Scoundrels have been known to do that. The truth, established through the rigorous and public scrutiny of the law, is the only remedy if an untrue story has gained currency not just internationally but at home among a large section of the people. Najib should voluntarily offer to testify at the trial of the two officers charged with killing Altantuya Shaariibuu. He could also write to these newspapers and if necessary he should take legal action against them to clear his name and that of our country."
The case has troubling aspects that have increasingly been noted in British and French newspapers after Asia Sentinel raised them in 2007. They bear repeating.

According to testimony in the trial of the two men accused of killing her, Altantuya accompanied her then-lover Abdul Razak Baginda to Paris at a time when Malaysia's defense ministry was negotiating through a Kuala Lumpur-based company, Perimekar Sdn Bhd, to buy two Scorpene submarines and a used Agosta submarine produced by the French government under a French-Spanish joint venture, Armaris, which in turn was bought by DCNS, a French contractor, in 2007. Perimekar at the time was owned by a company called Ombak Laut, which was wholly owned by Abdul Razak.

The contract was not competitive. The Malaysian ministry of defense paid €1 billion (RM 4.5 billion) to Amaris for the three submarines, for which Perimekar received a commission of €114 million (RM510 million). Deputy Defense Minister Zainal Abdidin Zin told the Dewan Rakyat, Malaysia's parliament, that the money was paid for "coordination and support services" although the fee amounted to a whopping 11 percent of the sales price for the submarines. Altantuya, by her own admission in the last letter she wrote before her murder, said she had been blackmailing Abdul Razak Baginda, pressuring him for US$500,000. She did not say how she was blackmailing him, leaving open lots of questions.

The French government has never shown any enthusiasm for investigating French companies alleged to be involved in corruption in gaining contracts overseas. It appears likely that it will in this case.

After Altantuya was murdered, one of her accused assassins, Sirul Umar, in a written confession, said he and his boss had been offered RM50,000 to RM100,000 to kill her. In the 22 months since the trial began, nobody in court has thought to ask who was going to pay the money. Abdul Razak Baginda was exonerated by the court and has left the country to study at Oxford.

Nizar: This is no mere by-election



Kes Penganiyaan Tahanan Akan Berterusan…

Author: Office of Mp Kapar

Berikut adalan soalan dan Jawapan yang diberikan oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri berkenaan penyeksaan oleh segelintir Polis terhadap tahanan dalam lokap. Ini baru lokap polis, bagaimana di Penjara-penjara seluruh negara.

Selagi, Menteri serta Peguam Negara cuba melindungi kesalahanan-kesalahan Pihak Polis selagi itu penganiyaan Tahanan akan berterusan. Terbaru di Chemor Perak, ahli keluarga juga di lanyak habis-habisan .

Bukankah ini suatu Penderhakaan oleh yang Berkuasa Kepada Raja dan Negara?

10 Mac 2009

Soalan Lisan YB Kapar dijawap melalui Tulisan

Tuan Manikavasagam a/l Sundaram meminta Menteri Dalam Negeri menyatakan apakah langkah-langkah yang telah dan akan diambil untuk memastikan pegawai polis tidak menyeksa tahanan melampuai batasan dan apakah kementerian bercadang untuk menubuhkan sebuah jawatankuasa bebas.

Jawapan YB Menteri :

Tuan Yang Di Pertua,

Saya mengucapkan terima kasih kepada Ahli Yang Berhormat Kapar yang mengemukakan pertanyaan.

Untuk makluman Ahli-Ahli Yang Berhormat dan Dewan Yang Mulia ini, sebagai sebuah agensi penguatkuasaan Undang-Undang , PDRM sentisa mengutamakan kepentingan menghormati undang-undang. Oleh yang demikian, setiap pengambilan bagi jawatan anggota dan pegawai sama ada Konstabel, Inspektor percubaan atau Kadet ASP akan menjalani latihan asa selama 6 bulan di pusat latihan polis. Di antara penekanan yang diberikan dalam modul latihan tersebut ialah memahami , menghayati dan menghormati undang-undang negara. Kesimpulannya, secara asasnya, semua pegawai polis telah dilatih untuk memiliki kefahaman untuk menghormati hak-hak asasi manusia termasuk kepada orang tahanan.

Tuan Yang Di Pertua,

Pihak Kementerian yakin dan percaya , melalui pematuhan kepada undang-undang sepertio Seksyen 15 Kanun Tatacara Jenayah berhubung cara-cara penangkapan dan larangan penggunaan kekerasan yang berlebihan akan dapat mencegah daripada belakuanya kes-kes orang tahan diseksa atau didera. Seksyen 20 Kanun Tatacara Jenayah juga memperuntukkan peraturan atau cara-cara memeriksa orang yang ditangkap dan Seksyen 20A akta yang sama turut memperuntukkan prosedur mengenai pemeriksaan orang yang hendak dimasukkan kedalam lokap.

Tuan Yang DiPertua,

Ketua Polis Negara juga telah mengeluarkan arahan supaya lawatan rutin oleh Ketua Polis Balai ke atas lokap hendaklah di adakan pada setiap hari. Di samping itu, pegawai-pagawai kanan polis di daerah-daerah juga diberikan tanggungjawab untuk melawat lokap-lokap di kawasan masing-masing mengikut giliran. Arahan juga telah dikeluarkan supaya salam setiap sesi soal siasat, seorang pegawai kanan dimestikan hadir sebagai penyelia. Sebagai usaha penambahbaikan pada masa akan datang, semua sesi soal siasat yang dijalankan oleh pihak polis akan dirakamkan dan disimpan sebagai rekod.

Tuan Yang Dipertua,

Kementerian yakin melalui pelaksanaan langkah-langkah tersebut, kes-kes orang tahanan yang diseksa oleh polis akan dapat ditangani dan dicegah . Sehubungan dengan itu, Kementerian tidak Bercadang untuk mewujudkan sebuah jawatankuasa bebas bagi menyiasat kes-kes polis menyeksa orang tahanan kerana dalam dua kejadian yang melibatkan Prabakar a/l Bala Krishnan yang telah disiram dengan air panas, 6 orang anggota polis yang terlibat telah di tuduh ,sementara bagi Kes A Kugan pula, siasatan masih lagi belum dapat dilengkapkan sehinggalah semua laporan pakar diperolehi.