Share |

Friday, 19 August 2011

'How can we be loyal to you if you're disloyal to us?'

(Malaysiakini) Armed Forces chief General Zulkifeli Mohd Zin today described those claiming that its rank-and-file had been involved in electoral fraud as an act of betrayal.

In an emotional statement issued this afternoon, Zulkifeli slammed those making the allegations and questioned their “loyalty” to the Armed Forces of Malaysia (ATM).

“The actions can be interpreted as treachery and it should stop immediately. The ATM is the nation's wall of defence that should be supported by all levels of the people, regardless of ethnicity, religion and political position...

“It is hoped that the ATM is not made a scapegoat by those seeking to advance their own interests... the people should show their support and appreciation for the contributions of the ATM.
"In this context: 'How can we be loyal to you if you are disloyal to us'?"
Yesterday, four ex-military personnel confessed to committing election fraud at a press conference organised by opposition party PAS.

NONEThe four - Major (Rtd) Risman Mastor, Kamarulzaman Ibrahim, Mohamed Nasir Ahmad and Mohd Kamil Omar - said they had marked thousands of postal votes in three separate general elections between 1978 and 1999.

According to the four, they were ordered by their commanding officers to mark postal votes for the hundreds and thousands of personnel who were out in the field.

Their expose yesterday was the second after an ex-army man came forward earlier this month, making a similar claim that he was ordered to mark postal votes for other military personnel.

'Irresponsible parties' misleading the rakyat

Zulkifeli countered the allegations, stressing that the Armed Forces has always respected the freedom of its troops to cast their votes, as enshrined under the Elections Act 1958 and section 16 of the Election Regulations (Postal Votes) 2003.

“The Armed Forces denies that there is any manipulation as claimed,” he said in a written statement, issued to the media at today's press conference.

“The voting process carried out by the Armed Forces is clean, transparent and professional without any interference by all levels of the Armed Forces' leadership.”

Zulkifeli also accused “irresponsible parties” of trying to sully the Armed Forces' image by “poisoning the minds of the rakyat and erode their trust and support” in the Armed Forces – which he described as “apolitical”.

In what appears to be an indirect attack on the opposition – which has been highlighting several allegedly dubious arms acquisitions by the country – he claimed that there have been clear efforts to leak out military secrets and to spread false information regarding the efficacy and capabilities of the Armed Forces' weapons systems.

“Such actions will not only expose military secrets to interested parties who want to know the Armed Forces capabilities, but even worse, it has shaken the confidence of Armed Forces personnel,” he said.

Additional reporting by Salhan K Ahmad.

Asylum seekers not welcome in PD

The presence of asylum seekers will mar the town's tourist image, says the state assemblyman.

PORT DICKSON: Residents of Port Dickson are fervently hoping that the Australian High Court will rule against the deportation of 54 asylum seekers to Malaysia when it hears the matter on Aug 22.

The 54 are meant to be the first batch of asylum seekers sent to Malaysia under the recently inked Australia-Malaysia refugee swap deal.

They were originally scheduled to arrive two weeks ago but faced a setback after an injunction against their deportation was extended.

The asylum seekers – mostly Afghans and Pakistanis – will be housed in two transit homes in Port Dickson for a maximum of 30 days while their applications are being processed.

The first home, Rumah Cycle Carri, comprises a colonial bungalow and two wooden chalets. The second, Cresent Peak, is a former hotel. Both facilities are slightly smaller than a football field.

When FMT visited Port Dickson last weekend, renovation work on both facilities was already in progress.
A third transit home, Pearl Villa Hotel and Resort, had pulled out of the arrangement last week after finding out the real purpose behind the hotel reservations.

“We were lied to,” a hotel spokeman told FMT. “The person who made the reservations first told us that it was for a group of engineers. Then it was changed to management trainees.”

Security issues

“Later on, officials from the Immigration Department and the Australian Embassy visited the hotel and told us that the booking was for embassy officials.”

“We only found out that we were one of the transit homes when we read the newspapers a few days ago and we immediately cancelled the booking. It’s a lot of money but not worth the risk.”

The spokesman added that the hotel was beseiged by worried calls from their regular clients and residents in surrounding areas.

“There is strong concern about security issues,” he said. “None of us were told that the asylum seekers would be housed in Port Dickson and we’re not sure what to expect. No one is telling us anything.”

Port Dickson state assemblyman, M Ravi, expressed similar frustration and opposition to the housing of asylum seekers in the seaside town.

He claimed that he had not been officially informed of this decision and had found out through a friend who is providing the transport for the asylum seekers.

“We don’t want them here,” he said bluntly. “If the government wants to place them in Negri Sembilan, then go to Kuala Pilah and Bahau instead. Don’t choose a tourist destination.”

“The residents are very unhappy as they feel that their security, especially that of their children’s, will be threatened. Already, there is unnecessarily high security at Crescent Peak which has created a sense of uneasiness among the locals.”

Beachside accommodations

Ravi also demanded to know where the asylum seekers would be placed once their applications are processed. The government has said that they will be “released into the community” but has made no mention of which community.

“Will they go to Kuala Lumpur or remain in Port Dickson?” he asked. “We need to know all these details before they arrive here.”

Bar Council Human Rights Committee chairman, Andrew Khoo, noted an element of a public relations exercise in the choice of Port Dickson.

“The government wants to show Australia that the asylum seekers are being housed in very nice beachside accommodations,” he said. “But these are transit homes. What happens after that?”

Khoo also pointed out that the two facilities were akin to detention centres as the asylum seekers would not be allowed to leave the ground.

“The community is not being adequately prepared either,” he added. “We’re not just talking about the official part of the preparations but also the social and community preparation.”

Bukit Jalil residents to DBKL: Honour Saravanan’s pledge



Federal Territories and Urban Well-Being deputy minister M Saravanan has given the assurance that no eviction will take place till a settlement has been reached with DBKL.

KUALA LUMPUR: Federal Territories and Urban Well-Being deputy minister M Saravanan has given the assurance that Bukit Jalil residents will not be evicted from their homes till a settlement has been reached with Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL).

But the residents hope that DBKL will honour Saravanan’s directive and reconvene negotiations as possible.

Speaking after submitting a letter to DBKL mayor Ahmad Fuad Ismail today, Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) secretary-general S Arutchelvan called upon DBKL to honour Saravanan’s words.

On Monday, Saravanan had reportedly told a Tamil daily that he had instructed DBKL not to evict the residents until both parties reached an amicable solution.

Although the residents lost their case in court, Saravanan told the daily that the government was still deliberating on how to help the residents.

“Till then, no eviction will take place. The residents can stay there in peace,” Saravanan told the daily.
Arutchelvan called upon Ahmad Fuad to reconvene negotiations with the residents soon to settle the matter once and for all.

Also present were Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar, Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) coordinator Fadiah Nadwa Fikri, Oppressed People’s Network (Jerit) coordinator E Nalini, Hindraf Makkal Sakthi national coordinator K Balakrishnan and Malaysian Indians Progressive Association (MIPA) secretary-general S Bharatidasan.

A copy of the letter was also sent to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.

MPs to write to minister


The 41 families living in the former estate area are in a stand-off with DBKL after the latter issued eviction notices to them under the Emergency Ordinance (EO) in March.

They argued that EO could only be used to evict squatter residents, not estate workers.

However, in May, the High Court quashed the residents’ application for an injunction against DBKL. The court also dismissed the residents’ suit against DBKL last Thursday. They have since filed for an appeal over the verdict.

Balakrishnan, who is also a resident in the estate, said all they wanted was four acres of land from the 26 acres land the City Hall wishes to develop.

“Our forefathers toiled in the estate in the past to contribute to our nation’s economy. Najib should adhere to our request if he really cares about us,” said Balakrishnan.

Sharing her views, Nurul Izzah said she and her MP collegues, Tian Chua and Khalid Ibrahim would write letters to Federal Territories and Urban Well-Being Minister Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin to remind him of Saravanan’s promise to the former estate workers.

“The residents are now living in fear. These people have lived there for generations and I hope both parties come to a mutual understanding to the matter,” said Nurul.

Glimmer of hope for villagers facing eviction

Six villagers from Balik Pulau who are facing eviction by a developer have been given a chance to make their defence in court.

GEORGETOWN: There is a glimmer of hope for six villagers who have taken on a developer which is trying to evict them from their land to make way for a residential-cum-property development.

The six villagers, who have been staying at their Pondok Upeh homes in Balik Pulau for over 50 years, will now get an opportunity to have their say in court.
A magistrate’s court here today fixed Sept 8 to hear their statements of defence.

Magistrate Mohd Hidayat Wahab ordered this during mention of an application by the developer , Evergreen One Development Sdn Bhd, to obtain a court order to evict the villagers.

Represented by lawyer Sumarni Saad, the developer has also requested the court to fix the quantum of compensation to be paid to the villagers.

The six villagers are challenging the developer’s summons by demanding an improved compensation.
The defendants are O Arumugam, G Neelavathi, M Jegadeesan, K Muniandy, Khuik Ah Nai @ Ani Abdullah and Quan Yam Sen.

They are represented by counsel Yusmadi Yusoff, who is also the Balik Pulau Member of Parliament.
The villagers were issued an eviction order by the developer in April 2010.


Originally the developer offered cash compensation of between RM10,000 and RM16,000 each, which the defendants rejected.

Each of them instead asked for a low-cost flat unit to be built in the project as compensation.

But the developer rejected their request and instead made a counter offer, improving the cash compensation to between RM14,000 and RM20,000 in August last year.

However, the villagers rejected the compensation and insisted on their demand for a flat unit each.
Yusmadi said the Pondok Upeh case was just an indication of the social problems caused by the sudden surge in urbanisation of Balik Pulau.

He said currently he was handling some 100 cases pertaining to eviction and compensation issues of Balik Pulau residents affected by the fast-growing development.

Yusmadi has started a public interest impact fund to financially aid the villagers in their litigations and welfare needs.

“I hope well-wishers would donate to this fund to help these poor villagers,” he told reporters in the court building.

Special investigation: TV company takes millions from Malaysian government to make documentaries for BBC... about Malaysia


Corporation suspends relations with leading film-maker accused of conflict of interests over 'palm oil' programmes

An investigation by The Independent has established that entries in the Malaysian government's Supplementary Budget 2010 show that FBC Media (UK) was allocated 28.35m Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) – nearly £6m – for work on a "Global Strategic Communications Campaign" ordered by the Malaysian government in 2009. A similar sum (MYR29.34m) was designated to the company the previous year. Concerns over the arrangements have been raised in the Malaysian parliament. 

By Ian Burrell and Martin Hickman, The Independent

The BBC has launched an investigation into how it broadcast to millions of people around the world programmes made by a company that had received millions of pounds in payments from the government of Malaysia.

It has suspended all programming from the London-based production company, FBC, which since 2009 has made at least four BBC documentaries dealing with Malaysia and controversial issues such as the country's contentious palm oil industry and its treatment of rainforests and indigenous people.

In a statement, the BBC said: "FBC has now admitted to the BBC that it has worked for the Malaysian government. That information was not disclosed to the BBC as we believe it should have been when the BBC contracted programming from FBC. Given this, the BBC has decided to transmit no more programming from FBC while it reviews its relationship with the company."

An investigation by The Independent has established that entries in the Malaysian government's Supplementary Budget 2010 show that FBC Media (UK) was allocated 28.35m Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) – nearly £6m – for work on a "Global Strategic Communications Campaign" ordered by the Malaysian government in 2009. A similar sum (MYR29.34m) was designated to the company the previous year. Concerns over the arrangements have been raised in the Malaysian parliament.

Documents filed with the United States government's House of Representatives in 2008 show that FBC Media (UK) contracted the Washington-based American lobbying company APCO Worldwide, which it paid more than US$80,000 (£50,000) in 2008 for the purpose of "raising awareness of the importance of policies in Malaysia that are pro-business and pro-investment as well as [showing] the significance of reform and anti-terrorism efforts in that country".

The BBC's guidelines on conflict of interest state: "Independent producers should not have inappropriate outside interests which could undermine the integrity and impartiality of the programmes and content they produce for the BBC."

Having obtained this information on the Malaysian payments, the BBC is conducting an investigation into whether any of the FBC material it broadcast was in breach of BBC guidelines on impartiality. At the same time, CNBC, a business channel owned by the giant American NBC network, has withdrawn "indefinitely" its weekly show World Business, which was made by FBC and featured Malaysia on many occasions. In a statement issued to The Independent, the broadcaster said: "In light of serious questions raised two weeks ago, CNBC withdrew the programme World Business indefinitely and immediately initiated an examination of FBC and its business practices. CNBC has made a formal inquiry to FBC for its explanation in relation to the allegations that have been made."

FBC denies any impropriety in its programmes for any broadcaster and said via its lawyers that "at no time have the television programmes made for the BBC ever been influenced or affected by our client's commercial activities". Its lawyers said that FBC ran both production and commercial divisions, which "are and always have been quite separate and distinct". They added: "Our client, having reviewed its procedures, is now taking steps to ensure that even the merest appearance of bias or overlap is fully avoided."

Last night, media regulator Ofcom said: "Ofcom is currently assessing this matter in accordance with our published procedures. We will shortly decide whether to launch a full investigation of the content in question under the broadcasting code."

The BBC and palm oil

With its lush vegetation and smiling workforce dressed in polo shirts, the footage from the Tuan Mee palm oil estate, to the north of Kuala Lumpur, gave no obvious reason for BBC viewers to think they were being shown anything more than an exotic travelogue and an intriguing business story.

But the coverage of the workings of one of Malaysia's most important industries, shown on BBC World News's Third Eye series this summer under the title "The Power of Asia", formed part of a much bigger picture.

The programme was made for the BBC by a London-based company called FBC Media, which has been hired by Malaysia to conduct a Global Strategic Communications Campaign, and has paid American lobbyists to raise "awareness of the importance of policies in Malaysia that are pro-business and pro-investment".

In the Third Eye programme, one of several productions made on Malaysia for the BBC in the last three years, viewers were told of the key role of the Malaysian palm oil industry in meeting the growing demand for food in countries such as China and India. "Once an efficient production centre for rubber, Malaysia over the years has increasingly turned to oil palm," said the voiceover. "The country is now one of the world's biggest exporters, producing 40 per cent of global supply, and is reaping the economic benefits of higher demand from Asia."

Azman Abdul Majid, of the Tuan Mee estate, was happy to tell his positive story. "The market now is so high that plantation in palm oil is a very good business in terms of profit, in terms of our benefit," he said. The BBC show also featured Kuala Lumpur Kepong, another Malaysian palm oil business, and other Malaysian business figures.

The programme dealt with the growing food crisis in Asia and the economic instability and social unrest that may result. It highlighted failures in harvesting rice in China and contrasted that with the successful Malaysian palm oil industry. "There are now more than 200,000 smallholders depending on the sale of palm oil," the programme stated.

It noted that "stocks in Asia's food companies from Mumbai to Kuala Lumpur are now hotly traded", but stressed the need to expand to meet the vast food demand. Indian companies were anxious to invest in Malaysian palm oil plantations "but land prices are now too high".

Only a brief reference was made to the reasons why the palm oil industry is the subject of fierce debate. Environmental groups complain that its spread has caused devastating levels of deforestation which harm biodiversity, threaten the livelihoods of indigenous people and put at risk the survival of the orang-utan.

The programme took the view that production needed to be stepped up fast: "Asia is now experiencing rising demand and rising prices for grains and oils but production is lagging, as is investment and increases in yield." It concluded with a sense of urgency: "Asia is going to have to grow its way out of trouble – and the clock is ticking."

It was not the first time that BBC viewers had shown programming on Malaysia produced by FBC. In February 2011, BBC World News broadcast on its One Square Mile programme a piece from Sarawak in which presenter Rian Maelzer, who describes himself as the "South East Asia Correspondent" for FBC's CNBC programme World Business, explored the lifestyle of the tribal Iban people and took a boat ride to visit a traditional longhouse.

"Tourism not only brings in money, it also encourages youngsters to keep alive skills that might otherwise have died out," he reported. "For the past 40 years, the Malaysian government has practised an affirmative-action policy aimed at raising the living standards of indigenous groups." The attractive portrayal of Sarawak, and the fight to preserve traditional culture, is at odds with the area's reputation among environmentalists, who have highlighted the battle of indigenous people in Sarawak to preserve the rainforest against logging and the development of palm oil plantations.

Similar subjects were examined in FBC's Develop or Die documentary for the BBC in March 2009. The programme opened with a cartoon that drew comparisons between colonialists who asked "Are the natives friendly?", and modern-day environmentalists who ask "Are the natives eco-friendly?" It examined the benefits of the Malaysian palm oil industry and its value to the economy, quoting smallholders whose lives have been transformed for the better by palm oil production. While it quoted environmentalists, it reported that "the major players in the industry resent the sweeping nature of environmental campaigns".

The programme concluded by pointing out the pressure on nations such as Malaysia to develop. "Now that their economies are more likely to fuel global growth in the next few years, they are more than ever questioning why they should be punished by Western-imposed standards." As part of its Develop or Die series, BBC World News also screened an FBC co-production, "World Debate: Islam and Democracy in 2009", featuring Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak sitting alongside the host on the panel.

FBC's 'blue-chip service'

FBC is a media company with offices in London, Mumbai and Rome. It told The Independent that the programmes it has made "have always been fair, balanced and impartial". It also said that it was no longer working for Malaysia.

When The Independent first questioned the company about its business at the end of last month, it denied that it had ever done work for Malaysia. Confronted with evidence of contractual arrangements listed in Malaysian public records, the company's lawyers said they had made an "error", having "failed to spot an amendment made by our client to a draft letter that we had prepared".

It stated: "It is no secret that FBC received funds and performed consultancy work and media-buying for the Malaysian government in the past." Of its hiring of American lobbyists to promote Malaysia, it said: "The object of that work involved showing the economy of Malaysia to be attractive to investors and committed to battling terrorism."

After FBC was contacted by The Independent, most of its website was replaced with a single page, giving only the most basic of information. In its online promotional material for potential clients – now removed from the internet – FBC boasted: "We control blue-chip television editorial time-slots" and can "guarantee controlled messaging from A to Z on the world's leading news channels". Telling would-be customers that "FBC is not a traditional PR firm", it stated that it "can guarantee that your message is endorsed by prestige third-party ambassadors".

FBC also talked of its "broadcast news feeds" and informed clients that "by facilitating independent editorial coverage, broadcast news feeds can raise awareness amongst a highly targeted audience". In another statement on its former website, it said: "FBC specialises in the planning and execution of strategic communications and branding campaigns, helping raise awareness across the international media landscape". It then promised "an elite audience via" and listed a series of prestigious media brands including BBC World (now BBC World News), CNN, CNBC Europe and a number of print publications including The Economist, the Financial Times, Business Week, the Wall Street Journal and the International Herald Tribune.

FBC says that its company is split into two distinct divisions, one for television production and the other for branding. It says its references to "time-slots" were "to paid advertising commercial spots and paid advertorial programming that is clearly labelled as such".

The founder and chairman of the FBC Group, which is the 100 per cent owner of both FBC Branded Content and FBC Media (UK), is Alan Friedman, an award-winning journalist and former banking correspondent at the Financial Times. Friedman was credited as the "executive producer" of three of the FBC programmes featuring Malaysia made for the BBC.

Before the BBC broadcasts, it is understood that FBC, which has made 20 programmes for the BBC, signed the BBC's standard producer guidelines which guarantee to "not accept money or other services or benefits from any individual, company or organisation with a view to endorsing or promoting such services and/or products in the series or series publicity or which could lead to doubts about the subjectivity or impartiality of the series".

In a statement to The Independent, the BBC said: "All independent TV companies who produce programmes for BBC World News have to sign strict agreements to ensure programmes meet the BBC's editorial guidelines, including avoiding any conflict of interest."

BBC World News attracts 78 million viewers a week, is available in more than 200 countries and reaches around 300 million households and more than 1.8 million hotel rooms. The channel's content, which includes advertising, is also available on 57 cruise ships, 42 airlines, 35 mobile phone networks and a number of major online platforms including bbc.com/news.

The American-owned business channel CNBC has also begun an examination of "FBC and its business practices" and "withdrawn indefinitely" the programme the company produces, World Business. In the past two years, FBC has made at least 10 programmes for CNBC's World Business featuring Mr Razak. In other editions, the previous prime minister, Abdullah Badawi, appeared as well as senior figures from Iskandar Malaysia, Malaysia Airlines and palm oil company Sime Darby. In March this year, the channel showed Deforestation in Sarawak, which was syndicated to other broadcasters, including US state broadcaster PBS. The programme featured Sarawak leader Taib Mahmud talking positively about the condition of the state's rainforests and highlighted the area's attraction to tourists.

Eckart Sager, the president of FBC, is a former producer with CNN who, since joining FBC, has personally conducted interviews with Mr Razak, and separately his wife Rosmah Mansor, for CNBC's World Business. Friedman, who is an American and lives in Rome, has also personally interviewed Razak. FBC is also linked to another award-winning journalist, John Defterios, the host of CNN show Marketplace Middle East, since 2007.

Defterios, the former group president of FBC Media, last month conducted an exclusive interview for CNN with Mr Razak during his official visit to London. During the interview, Defterios questioned the Prime Minister on recent mass street protests by democracy campaigners in Malaysia. "Some would say you had 1,600 arrests of some 20,000 protesters. Are you satisfied with the security response to that particular round of protests, yourself?" he asked. Razak responded: "It was quite mild, you know, because although they were taken in, they were released after eight hours and they were treated very well. There was no undue use of force."

CNN issued a statement to say it had "never had an editorial relationship with FBC" and that FBC Media had not been involved in setting up interviews. "FBC has released a public statement that John Defterios resigned from the company," it said.

"While we appreciate that John Defterios's relationship with FBC during his tenure with CNN could present the appearance of an editorial conflict, we have been reviewing the situation and have found no indication that CNN's editorial standards were – or are in any way – compromised by that prior relationship."

The movers and shakers at the TV company
Alan Friedman, chairman and founder of FBC Group

The award-winning journalist, who studied at Johns Hopkins University, New York University and the London School of Economics, describes himself as a "media entrepreneur". He has worked for the Financial Times, the International Herald Tribune and the Wall Street Journal. In FBC material he is described as "one of Europe's most respected economic and political commentators". He is the author of books on the Italian industrialist Gianni Agnelli, and on America's arming of Iraq. Friedman was the executive producer of many of FBC's programmes for the BBC and has conducted some of FBC's interviews, including with Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak.

Eckart Sager, president and head of production for FBC

German-born and educated in the US, Sager is a former senior producer for CNN, based in London. He previously worked for CNN in New York, travelling the world profiling leading business figures. He is the executive producer of many of FBC's documentaries and also "provides key strategic communications advice and support on behalf of FBC clients". Sager has also personally interviewed Mr Razak for FBC.

John Defterios, former group president of FBC Media from 2000-2011

Since 2007, he has been the presenter of CNN International's Marketplace Middle East programme and is a journalist with 25 years' experience. He is a CNN news anchor and former Reuters bureau chief. In July this year he conducted an exclusive interview with Mr Razak for CNN during the Malaysian Prime Minister's visit to London, CNN said the interview did not involve FBC. Defterios resigned from FBC in March, the company has told CNN.

The money trail

* Malaysian budget records show that MYR28.35m (nearly £6m) was allocated to FBC Media (UK) for a "Global Strategic Communications Campaign" in 2009. A similar allocation was made in 2008. FBC Media (UK) is a subsidiary of FBC Group Ltd

* Documents filed with the United States House of Representatives show that FBC Media (UK) hired the Washington lobbyists APCO Worldwide in 2008 for the purpose of "raising awareness of the importance of policies in Malaysia that are pro-business and pro-investment as well as the significance of reform and anti-terrorism efforts in that country"

The palm oil industry's history of misleading claims

The Malaysian palm oil industry has a history of offending the authorities by making false claims on BBC World.

Three years ago, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) criticised a campaign from the Malaysian Palm Oil Council (MPOC) for carrying "misleading" claims about its impact on the environment. The advertising from the MPOC, which was not made by FBC, appeared on BBC World in 2007 and showed a palm oil plantation interspersed with shots of a rainforest and wildlife. In a voiceover, it asserted that "its trees give life and help our planet to breathe, and give home to hundreds of species of flora and fauna. Malaysia palm oil: a gift from nature, a gift for life." The MPOC also claimed that palm oil had been "sustainably produced" since 1917.

A second advert showed a man running through a forest, cut with shots of a palm oil plantation and wildlife. The voiceover said of the palm oil industry: "Its trees give life and help our planet breathe. Its fruit provides vitamins for our bodies and energy for our daily lives." But the ASA upheld a complaint from Friends of the Earth International and Friends of the Earth Europe that the advert was misleading on the grounds that much palm oil was produced in a way that was not socially or environmentally sustainable. The advert was made before the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil completed a verification system for sustainable palm oil.

The ASA ruled that the advert "was likely to mislead viewers as to the environmental benefits of palm oil plantations compared with native rainforest". It also said viewers were misled "because there was not a consensus that there was a net benefit to the environment from Malaysia's palm oil plantations".

In July this year, another campaign from the MPOC was banned by the advertising watchdog in Belgium for once again claiming that the production of palm oil is "sustainable". The Jury d'Ethique Publicitaire ruled that production had impacts on the environment and the campaign was in breach of its environmental advertising code.

Afidavit Tolak Zainul Rijal Selaku Pendakwa Raya Dalam Kes Qazaf Di Mahkamah Syariah

BORANG MS 3
AKTA TATACARA MAL MAHKAMAH SYARIAH
(WILAYAH-WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN) 1998
(SubSeksyen 13(1))

PERMOHONAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN SYARIAH DI MALAYSIA
DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN
PERMOHONAN NO.
Dalam Perkara di bawah Rayuan No. 14000-099-0017-2010 di Mahkamah Rayuan Syariah di Malaysia, Wilayah Persekutuan di Kuala Lumpur (Rayuan ke atas Perintah Mahkamah Tinggi Syariah bertarikh 14.4.2010);
Dan
Dalam Perkara di bawah Rayuan No. 14000-099-0020-2010 di Mahkamah Rayuan Syariah di Malaysia, Wilayah Persekutuan di Kuala Lumpur (Permohonan Pengenepian Notis Rayuan);
Dan
Dalam Perkara Penghakiman/Perintah bertarikh 14.4.2010 di dalam Permohonan No. 14100-099-012-2010 di Mahkamah Tinggi Syariah Wilayah Persekutuan di Kuala Lumpur;
Dan
Dalam Perkara Arahan Amalan No. 4 Tahun 2002 ;
Dan
Dalam Perkara Kaedah 3, Kaedah 7 dan Kaedah 8 Etika Peguam Syarie 2000 di bawah Akta Pentadbiran Undang-Undang Islam (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1993
ANTARA
DATO’ SERI ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM …PEMOHON
(No. K.P. 470810-07-5095)
DAN

ZAINUL RIJAL BIN ABU BAKAR …RESPONDEN
(No. K.P. 690131-08-5165)

AMBIL PERHATIAN BAHAWA Pemohon yang dinamakan di atas bercadang memohon kepada Mahkamah Tinggi Syariah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur pada hari pada haribulan 2011, jam pagi/petang untuk mendapatkan perintah bahawa:-
1. Pemohon diberi kebenaran memfailkan Permohonan ini di Mahkamah Rayuan Syariah Wilayah Persekutuan melalui Notis Permohonan;
2. Responden ditegah dan tidak dibenarkan daripada mewakili dan menjadi Peguam Syarie di dalam kes Rayuan No. 14000-099-0017-2010 dan kes Rayuan No. 14000-099-0020-2010 di Mahkamah Rayuan Syariah di Malaysia, Wilayah Persekutuan;
3. Kos ditanggung oleh Responden;
4. Lain-lain relif yang difikirkan patut dan sesuai oleh Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini;
Alasan permohonan ini sebagaimana berikut:-
i) Responden telah berkelakuan tidak professional;
ii) Responden tidak bersifat jujur dan tidak berniat baik untuk menegakkan keadilan;
iii) Responden tidak menyenggara kebebasan profesionalnya dan bertindak bertentangan dengan kepentingan pentadbiran keadilan yang terbaik; dan
iv) Wujud percanggahan atau konflik kepentingan pada Responden
Permohonan ini disokong dengan Afidavit Pemohon yang dilampirkan.
Bertarikh haribulan Ogos 2011
……………………………………….
PEGUAM SYARIE PEMOHON
PERMOHONAN ini telah difailkan oleh Tetuan Kamar Ainiah, Raziff & Zashidi beralamat di E3A-3A, Jalan Selaman 1/2, Dataran Palma, Off Jalan Ampang, 68000 Ampang Selangor Darul Ehsan.
No. Tel: 03-42702055 No. Faks: 03- 42702077

MIC Youth Wants Sivarraajh's Suspension Lifted

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 18 (Bernama) -- The MIC Youth wants the one-year suspension on youth secretary C. Sivarraajh lifted, describing it as too harsh.

Its chief T. Mohan said he would raise the matter at the upcoming meeting of the party's decision-making body, the Central Committee (CC), on Aug 28.

"I will definitely raise this matter. We want him to be reinstated. The CC has the power to overrule the disciplinary committee's decision," he told Bernama here Thursday.

He added that based on similar cases previously, the committee should have either advised or warned Sivarraajh and not resorting to suspending him.

"I hoped the party president and the CC understand the situation and eventually lift the suspension," he added.

The CC suspended Sivarraajh on Tuesday after criticising the party's leadership for accepting back several members who were expelled in April last year.

He has since appealed against the suspension.

Sivarraajh was reported to have lodged a report with the Registrar of Societies after the party decided to reinstate three leaders, namely former youth deputy chief V. Mugilan and two former CC members, K.P. Samy and G. Kumar Amaan.

‘Tapah 6′ arrested over EO 6 ceramah

Two organisers of a PKR ceramah in Tapah were arrested when they tried to negotiate with police over a ceramah. Police said they had not given a permit for the ceramah and claimed that they had received complaints.
 
The two were Perak state assembly member for Teja, Chang Lih Kang, and Tan Kah Hing, and they are being investigated under Section 27(3) of the Police Act for allegedly disturbing the peace. Leaflets and the PA system were also taken away.

Police had moved in while Sungai Siput MP Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj was speaking at the celebration to mark the release of the PSM 6. With light strike force and a police van on standby, police gave the gathering 15 minutes to disperse.

According to a tweet by Kah Hing, a retired corporate figure based in Perak had earlier donated RM50000 to the PSM.

Lih Kang and Kah Hing were taken to the Tapah District Police Headquaters to have their statements recorded. Outside a small group gathered to chant “Bebas, bebas!” Police came out and arrested four of them: Nagen (PSM), Patrick Vincent (PSM), Appalasamy (DPPPas), and Chua Yee Ling (PKR Ulu Selangor councillor).

Jeyakumar lodged a report against the action while lawyer Baldip Singh arrived to assist those arrested.
The six were released on police bail just before midnight after their statements were taken and bail was processed. They will have to report to the station on 19 September 2011.

“These arrests are only going to make the people of Tapah upset,” Jeyakumar said when contacted.

Thursday, 18 August 2011

Fire at DAP HQ, leaders cry arson

First it was splashed with red paint, and now a fire breaks out at the Penang DAP headquarters. The party's state chief believes that those with political motives are behind the attacks.

PETALING JAYA: A fire broke out at the Penan
g DAP headquarters this morning, four days after the premises was splashed with red paint.

A stack of newspapers placed outside the building was razed in what is believed to be an arson attack on the office in Jalan Talipon which is located in a residential area.

“I have nothing but words of condemnation against those who have perpetrated such a dangerous, violent and shameful act,” said state party chief Chow Kon Yeow, adding that it could have endangered the lives of those living next door.

“Our headquarters is neither a bungalow nor a tower; we are joined with houses of the people.

“This reckless attempt at burning down our office could have endangered the lives of others living in adjacent units. If not for the quick-thinking and resourceful neighbours we have, this fire could have had worse consequences,” he added.

Chow said in view of recent incidents, he believed that the arson attack was part of a coordinated act by those with political motives.

Related to ban?

The arson attack, according to the twitter postings by several DAP leaders, could be related to the decision in Penang to bar the use of loudspeakers for reciting verses from the Quran before dawn prayers.
The ban was played up by certain quarters to portray DAP as stifling the rights of Muslims.

Penang mufti Hassan Ahmad however clarified that the decision was made by the state religious authorities, and not the state government.

Chow also urged parties dissatisfied with decisions made by the Penang government to air it via proper channels instead of resorting to violent means.

“We are ready to engage citizens who have genuine concerns, we are open to criticism, and we are ready to provide answers to the questions that have been asked of us,” he said.

He also urged the police to investigate the attacks on the DAP headquarters.

“The longer the police delay action, the more it will look like hate crimes against DAP are permitted,” he said.

Muhyiddin mulls over strategic options

Time is not on the side of the deputy prime minister if he is aiming for the top job. He can either go for broke, plan an exit strategy or hope his boss will do badly in the coming general election.
COMMENT - FMT
Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, a battle-hardened veteran, has suddenly found that time is not on his side at all, and with good reasons too. He stands poised at 64 to enter the wrong side of the 60s in the blink of an eye.

The word from his people is that their man has to decide, sooner rather than later, from among several strategic options arrayed before him.

He may prefer, as he has been doing for some time now, to run hard in the same place. Such an approach is clearly exhausting and can by no means be retained for the long haul.

His current education portfolio, once a minefield and a stepping-stone to the premiership, is a virtual bummer after all the politicising that has gone on here for so long.

No one except for the oddball here and there is in the least bit interested whether national schools retain Malay or English, or both, for the teaching of maths and science. The deputy prime minister is trying to squeeze water from a stone here.

No one batted an eyelid either when Muhyiddin called in recent days for the teaching of English to be reviewed. There was only ominous silence when he revealed that after 17 years of learning English in school – two years nursery, two years kindergarten, six years primary, five years secondary and two years pre-university – a student can only smile and giggle nervously when interviewed in English.

Exit strategy

Muhyiddin can also work out an exit strategy, anathema to his many supporters, or go for broke and take on Najib Tun Razak, his boss and Umno president who is a good many years his junior.

Screaming that enough is enough is not an immediate option since Najib has craftily postponed the Umno elections until after the next general election. The excuse was provided by Muhyiddin’s infamous statement not so long ago that he’s Malay first, a Malaysian second. That was seen as knocking Najib’s 1Malaysia theme for his administration in the teeth at a time when he most needed support.

Muhyiddin has survived the storm in a teacup that followed. However, his deliberately calculated insult on national television has neither been forgiven nor forgotten by Najib’s people. It will be payback time at the first opportunity that Najib gets to even scores with a deputy whose loyalty is now seriously in doubt.

Najib knows that he has to keep looking over his shoulder now all the time when he’s not sleeping with an eye open, his rusting keris poised at his side. Such is the intrigue that has gone on in Malay politics since the Malayalee Muslims in Singapore first raised the banner of Malay nationalism to cope with the Chinese commercial spirit.

Muhyiddin has to now contend with the distinct possibility that many of his supporters will be summarily dropped from the slate for the next polls. Many of those who are retained will certainly not be given places in government if they win. Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, the eternal Machiavellian, employed this strategy to good advantage during his long innings, 22 years, in power.

Do-nothing strategy

Muhyiddin has yet another option– to wait it out until the general election is over and gamble on the possibility that Najib will be ousted if the ruling Barisan Nasional fails to wrest back its two-thirds majority in Parliament. That’s the fate that Najib’s predecessor, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, suffered after a drubbing at the 2008 general election. The opposition alliance, Pakatan Rakyat, retained Kelantan as expected and bagged another four states in Peninsular Malaysia and Kuala Lumpur.

Muhyiddin’s best bet is that Najib would have proven himself weak, at least on the surface, in the face of the machinations of the grand puppet master Mahathir within the Umno supreme council, which is in his pocket. The former premier, going on to 87, is determined to witness his son, Mukhriz, occupying Muhyiddin’s chair before he meets his maker. In order for that to happen, Mahathir has to stage-manage Muhyiddin’s political career and have him kicked upstairs to be a seat-warmer for his son.
In short, Muhyiddin can adopt the do-nothing strategy but it’s by no means a safe strategy.

Time is not on Mahathir’s side.

However, there is still, as yet, no sign that he will become senile in the near future and/or succumb to dementia although he has been known to plead temporary amnesia in the past.

If Mahathir forgets, Muhyiddin will be history, Najib too but that be more because the latter will die laughing. They may all, as yet, cancel each other out and remove themselves from the political equation. That would be one huge relief to all Malaysians who see Mahathir as the bane of their life, Najib a pitiful clown and his deputy one long in the making.

Between Najib and Muhyiddin, there are brickbats and bouquets as well for guessing if the opposition can fathom who’s the lesser of two evils. Blame this on the Mahathir factor, among others, which has seen Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim embroiled in a long-running Sodomy II in court. True, Mahathir used Najib to launch Sodomy II, a fact which Muhyiddin’s people keep reminding Anwar. But Muhyiddin is no angel either as evident from his involvement with Mahathir and Mukhriz to ease out Najib from the premiership. He (Anwar) may yet beat the odds and at least have the long, last laugh when the next general election results drift in. He is no doubt keeping his fingers crossed.

India faces risk of its own Arab Spring

A growing anti-graft movement is snowballing into one of the biggest challenges for the ruling Congress party.
By Paul de Bendern
NEW DELHI: An anti-corruption movement led by a feisty 74-year-old social activist is snowballing into one of the biggest challenges in decades for the ruling Congress party and, if not contained, risks sparking India’s own version of an Arab Spring revolt.

While no one is expecting an Egypt-like overthrow in the world’s biggest democracy, a galvanised and frustrated middle class and the mushrooming of social networking sites combined with an aggressive private media may be transforming India’s political landscape.

Anna Hazare has quickly become a 21st century Mahatma Gandhi inspiration for millions of Indians fed up with rampant corruption, red tape and inadequate services provided by the state despite the country posting near-double digit economic growth for almost a decade.

“Democracy means no voice, however small, must go unheard. The anti-corruption sentiment is not a whisper – it’s a scream. Grave error to ignore it,” Anand Mahindra, one of India’s leading businessmen and managing director of conglomerate Mahindra Group, wrote on Twitter.

Hazare’s arrest on Tuesday, only hours ahead of a planned fast until death against graft was the last straw and sparked spontaneous protest across the country of 1.2 billion people.

The young and old, rich and poor, without apparent political affiliations, took to the streets in a rare voice of solidarity – a potential lethal cocktail for any party in power in India.

Politicians are increasingly being judged on governance rather than old caste and regional ties – as has already happened in states like Bihar – and the new social shift will push national parties to be more responsive to voters’ needs.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the Congress party of the Gandhi-Nehru dynasty and the police stood isolated over the decision to arrest a man for planning a peaceful fast.

The Congress has for the past year reeled from mounting corruption scandals, including allegations of millions of dollars in kickbacks in the sale of mobile phone licences in what is emerging as India’s biggest-ever graft.

A former telecoms minister, top corporate executives and senior Congress party officials are in jail awaiting trial.

Indians have routinely voted out governments and in that sense the anti-graft movement is different from those sweeping the Middle East.

The next election is due in 2014 and an opinion poll last week by India Today showed that if elections were held today, Congress would just about lose out to the main opposition party.

Wake-up call

In a passionate speech in Parliament, 58-year-old opposition leader Arun Jaitley said protests witnessed over the past 24 hours, reaching even the remotest villages, were something he had not seen in his lifetime and must be a “wake-up call” for politicians to put their house in order.

Students, lawyers, teachers, and business executives have taken to social networks like Twitter and Facebook to spread the message and vent frustration against corruption.


“These protests are part of a global phenomenon, thanks to technology and a more proactive media,” said N Bhaskara Rao, social researcher and chairman of independent think-tank Centre
for Media Studies.

Most people do not expect India to follow the example of North Africa and the Middle East. But one of five Indians go hungry and almost half the vast population is poor – causes for potential unrest.

India has been governed for most of the time since Independence in 1947 by the same family dynasty. For decades Indians united under these leaders but this year has seen a seismic gap emerging between the old guard and a vibrant and younger population.

“This has the ingredients of being India’s own non-violent Arab uprising,” said Savio Shetty, a stock market analyst in India’s financial hub Mumbai.

“But the dish needs to be cooked and looked after! Tahrir square was a rebellion against the government itself… of a 40-year tyrannical rule… things are quite different here.”

Manmohan remained defiant in Parliament over the arrest of Hazare, maintaining that anti-graft laws should be discussed and passed in Parliament and not by activists in the streets.

“When people exhaust their capacity for tolerance, then you should take it that it is a beginning of some kind of revolution. Now it has gone above people’s tolerance level,” Hazare told Reuters in a recent interview in his home village.

India ranked 87 in Transparency International’s index on corruption in 2010, behind rival China and polls show corruption vies with the high cost of living as the number one voter issue.

What is also apparent is that the anti-corruption protests have shown the limited influence of opposition parties, largely sidelined. They will need to reform to win over an increasingly disenfranchised population.

New power – middle class

The bulk of India’s political activism has been those aligned to political parties or paid to protest on their behalf.

But in recent years a growing and more prosperous middle class has given up its traditional distaste for politics and is seeking ways to exert greater influence.

“The new corporate middle class has little patience with the politics of dignity and identity that are – for better or worse – central to Indian politics,” wrote Vinay Sitapati in the Indian Express newspaper.

Almost half of India’s 1.2 billion population are farmers, many live on government subsidies and are reluctant to challenge local and national governments over endemic graft.

But with costs of living rising fast and daily news reports of state officials with meagre salaries caught with bags of cash and kilogrammes of gold, or registered as owners of multi-million-dollar homes, patience seems to have been snapped.

“Now citizens want to play a more participatory role in governance,” said Rao. “This will bring in a sea change in Indian politics.”
- Reuters

The case of Mr Khan

The sad truth is that most Malaysians have a short memory on matters that they would rather not get involved with.
COMMENT - FMT
By Lim Teck Ghee

Many Malaysians have forgotten how much we owe to Hindraf and its supporters for awakening the spirit of dissent and conscience of the people against the Barisan Nasional’s unscrupulous use of state force and power.

A little over three years ago, it was a Hindraf organized rally against the socio-economic and religious marginalization of poor Indians, especially of Tamil origin, that brought over 40,000 supporters to the streets of Kuala Lumpur to demonstrate for the right to justice and fair treatment.

It was an event that was quite unprecedented in our political history, including in the overkill and repressive measures used by the police and other government authorities.

We also seem to have forgotten the extraordinary personal sacrifices of the movement’s leaders in their efforts to assert their legitimate right to dissent and to draw attention to the plight of their community.

Five prime movers of the movement were incarcerated under the Internal Security Act and many supporters were subject to pressure and other forms of disincentives to compel them to abandon their struggle.

The political impact of the Hindraf movement can be seen in the results of the 2008 general election when a disenchanted electorate – drawing inspiration from the Hindraf struggle – saw through the hypocrisy of the BN’s policies and leadership and lost its fear of opposing the incumbent ruling parties.

Because we owe them so much, it is doubly disappointing that so few Malaysians appear to be concerned over the recent deportation of Imran Khan, the solicitor appointed for the Hindraf suit in Britain.

Khan was detained at KLIA on arrival at 2pm last Friday and deported at 2am the next day and apparently attempts by top officials from London and the British High Commission to assist him were not entertained by the Malaysian authorities.

Condoning deportation standards

The Malaysian authorities have not explained why they stopped a solicitor from meeting his clients.
To date too apparently, neither the Malaysian Bar nor any of the civil society movements nor members of Parliament have registered any concern or protested publicly, according to a Hindraf source.

This silence is all the more stunning given the audacious excuse by the authorities that Khan is a “prohibited immigrant” and his name is on the list of ‘wanted’ persons.

In fact Khan is a prominent Commonwealth citizen renowned for his work in human rights and the fight against racism.

Whatever misgivings one might have with Hindraf as Khan’s clients, it is important that we raise our voices and not be seen as condoning his deportation especially when this is a breach of recognized international protocols and when he has not uttered a word against the Malaysian government and can in no way be construed as “a threat to the country’s security”.

A chorus of protests was raised against the government when the solicitor from France, William Bourdon, was deported a month ago in connection with his visit to draw attention to the scandal over the Scorpene submarine case.

The same Hindraf source has noted that there has been a deafening silence for almost a week on Khan’s deportation and commented that “surely, the entire “civil society” and Bar could not possibly be ignorant?”

He was probably being sarcastic. The sad truth is that most Malaysians have a short memory on matters that they would rather not get involved with or whatever memory cells they have are easily short circuited by the official spin.

Four more ex-soldiers admit to postal vote fraud

Malaysiakini Postal vote manipulation has been a common practice in the military for many years – so it seems – now that more retired military personnel are speaking up.

Now, four ex-military personnel have confessed to committing election fraud – the same way an ex-army man said he did so earlier this month.

The four, who had served at army and air force bases across the country, say they marked thousands of postal votes in three separate general elections between 1978 and 1999.

The four – Major (Rtd) Risman Mastor, Kamarulzaman Ibrahim, Mohamed Nasir Ahmad and Mohd Kamil Omar – said they were ordered by their commanding officers to mark postal votes for the hundreds and thousands of personnel who were out in the field.


Their expose today is the second after an ex-army man came forward earlier this month, making a similar claim that he was ordered to mark postal votes for other personnel.

Kamarulzaman, who was a clerk working at the Terendak army camp in Malacca, said he was ordered to spend three days marking thousands of ballot papers during the 1986 general election.

The 53-year-old said he was given three pens of different colours, which he used alternately to sign the postal votes in the absence of the army personnel who were on their tour of duty.

“For example, I would use a blue pen to sign for one serviceman and a black pen to sign for his wife. I was also ordered to mark votes for the opposition,” he said at a press conference hosted at the PAS headquarters by the party’s youth wing.

When asked how many postal votes he signed, Kamarulzaman said he could not remember the exact number but was sure that it ran into the thousands.

“If you want to say how many, let’s just say my hand went numb (from signing the ballot papers). I basically voted for soldiers from all over the country.”

‘It was the wrong thing to do’

Kamil, a retired Air Force commando based at the Butterworth Air Force base, claimed he was offered a “reward” if he complied with the order to mark a box full of postal votes during the 1999 general election.
The 21-year veteran however refused to carry out the order, saying that he realised it was not right for him to mark ballots for his colleagues.

“They gave me a box, and expected me to mark all the ballots in 30 minutes. I realised it was wrong,” said the 49-year-old, adding that he has no idea what the “reward” was since he did not carry out the order.
Nasir, 50, who was a clerk based in Sandakan during the 1986 general election, said he and another colleague were told to split over 900 postal votes between them to be marked on behalf of their fellow soldiers.

He pointed out that being in the military, orders are orders and that soldiers were “not too bothered” about politics.

“Even after retirement, we didn’t care so much about politics. But when Bersih came about, we started to realise that what we did was not right,” he said.

Risman stressed that this practice went as far back as the 1978 general election, when he and nine others were ordered to go through around 200 sacks – each containing 10 postal votes – during his time at the Kampung Sawah army camp in Port Dickson.

“I did it just that one time… I don’t remember the figures but I believe there were about 10 (ballots) in each sack. In effect there were just 10 of us actually voting,” he said.

Global food price warning

We still think we can manage without creating food self-sufficiency and paying more attention to sustainable farming and agriculture?
 
From Democracy Now!
The World Bank has unveiled a report warning food costs are approaching levels that sparked massive unrest across the globe three years ago. José Cuesta, a senior economist at World Bank’s Poverty Reduction and Equity Group, unveiled the new findings.

José Cuesta: “Global prices of food remain very high, very close to 2008 peak levels, and basically one-third above of the prices that they were one year ago. They will find more difficult to access and to buy food. They will find more difficult to diversify their diets. And the cost of living for everyone, for all consumers, of course, especially the poor, will worsen. The cost of living will increase, and that will worsen their ability to buy the diversified foods.”

Toronto religious leader charged in sex assaults

A Toronto religious leader who police say has travelled the world has been charged with 13 sex offences, and investigators believe there may be more victims, both here and abroad.

Mohammad Masroor, 48, is the imam at the Baitul Mukaram Islamic Society on 3334 Danforth Ave. He has been teaching there since he came to Canada in 2008.

Masroor was arrested Aug. 10 and charged with 13 sex-related offences allegedly committed against five victims. The assaults allegedly occurred between Nov. 1, 2008 and July 28, 2011.

“The victims are both male and female,” Det. Const. Karen Armstrong said. “We believe there are other victims as (the accused) has lived and worked worldwide.”

Armstrong said police have been in touch with other victims and the investigation, which began three weeks ago, is “progressing.”

She said the accused “is known to the victims, but I can’t go into more detail than that. I don’t want to jeopardize the safety of the victims in any way.”

Masroor teaches in the mosque as well as in private homes.

Police say that before coming to Canada, Masroor was teaching in Florida, Michigan and Bangladesh. He has also lived and taught in Germany, France, Hungary, Singapore, and Sri Lanka. However, “our investigation is not limited to these locations,” Armstrong said.

Armstrong said the accused “was seen as a leader in the community and he used that to his advantage.”
Abdul Fattah Aboud, who used to work as an assistant imam at the same mosque as Masroor, said he was shocked at the charges.

"Is it possible? Someone like him?" he told the Star. "He's a very well respected person in the community."
Mir Mofazzal, who works as a caretaker at the mosque, has had dinner at Masroor's home. He said Masroor is married with two daughters and three sons.

"He's a very pious man," he said.

Police said Masroor is being held in custody, and that a publication ban is in place.
Toronto investigators have yet to speak with foreign police forces about the case, Armstrong said.

With files from Chloé Fedio

UK lawyer 'appalled' by state of Indians in M'sia

Putrajaya to review press act, but firm on race, religion issues

Hisham said today that a review of the law, which requires all print media to apply for an annual license, was one of the revisions currently being considered. — file pic
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 17 — The Home Ministry will review the Printing Presses and Publications Act (PPPA) but will stand firm on issues involving race and religion, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said today, in response to the prime minister’s promise to review the government’s censorship policy.


The home minister told reporters today that a review of the law which requires all print media to apply for an annual license was one of the steps the government was looking at in fulfilling Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s promise.

“Yes but let it be non-political and not at the expense of issues of race and religion,” Hishammuddin said when quizzed on calls for the PPPA to be reviewed following Najib’s pledge that current censorship laws would be reviewed.

However, he cautioned that “in a multiracial and multi-religious society, filtering must be done as absolute freedom can cause chaos.”

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had also said yesterday that the government will implement a special system to “monitor” the media, and that this mechanism will eventually replace censorship laws.

Najib had said that censorship laws are no longer effective in this day and age and can cause even more damage, citing the example of how his administration’s blacking out of an article on the July 9 Bersih rally by The Economist garnered more negative reaction than the actual story itself.

Hishammuddin added today that Putrajaya would continue to pursue a Media Consultative Council (MCC) as a “self-regulatory body” which will draw a consensus from media practitioners themselves.

He said that the ministry had met chief editors from several newspapers yesterday to begin discussions on the proposal.

The Malaysian Insider had reported that several media heads had chosen to snub a meeting last month to discuss the MCC’s terms of reference over fears that it would lead to even stricter press controls.

Under the PPPA, the print media can be punished under the “national security” clause while “false news” is punishable with a one-year imprisonment.

Critics of the law have described it as a sword hanging over the heads of publishers and editors, and exploited by the government to control dissent.

PSM demands probe on sexual misconduct by police

PSM has slammed the police's lackadaisical attitude towards its previous reports.

PETALING JAYA: Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) activists today lodged a disciplinary report against the police demanding that they investigate previous claims of sexual misconduct against detainees.

Party secretary-general S Arutchelvan said today’s report revolved around previous police reports that were lodged by members in Kepala Batas, Penang and Ipoh on the same issue.

Early last month, 36 PSM activists were detained while carrying out their “Udahlah Bersaralah” campaign in Perak.

(“Udahlah tu.. Bersaralah or Enough already, Retire now” was a nationwide campaign to remind Malaysians of the pitfalls of returning Barisan Nasional to power in the 13th general election.)
They were detained in Kepala Batas, Penang.

They have been charged with distributing subversive documents and Bersih 2.0-related paraphernalia.
According to Arutchelvan, the detained activists had to endure abuses including sexual abuse during their detention.

“There were detainees who were told to undress in the presence of male police officers,” he told FMT today.

Today’s police report was lodged by activists P Jothi, G Pakialetchumi, P Indra, R Ramasamy and G Velayutham.

Asked about the reaction from the police on today’s police report, Arutchelvan said that the report was received by one officer known only as ASP Krishnakumari.

“She told us that they (the police) would need six months to investigate the matter.”

Arutchelvan also questioned the police’s lackadaisical attitude in acting on the previous reports.
“The police should have interviewed our people and conducted an identification parade,” he said.

Hindraf lawyer: No dignity even in death

British lawyer Suresh Grover's fact-finding mission takes him to various places around the country, including visiting poorly maintained Hindu cemeteries.

BATU KAWAN: Hindraf Makkal Sakti lawyer Suresh Grover is appalled by the poor living conditions of many Indian families in this country.

“There is no dignity even in death for Tamils. It’s happening here today… it’s shocking,” the visiting British lawyer who is on a fact-finding mission to Malaysia told some 100 residents here last night.

Suresh described several Hindu cemeteries that he visited as swamp-like graveyards lying on water-logged landscape without proper drainage and engulfed by overgrown vegetation.

Although he acknowledged that a segment of ethnic Indians were living in the comfort zone, he said the bulk of the community was still impoverished.

He blamed the sub-standard quality of life of these working class Indians on state-sponsored marginalisation policies.

Since arriving here, Suresh said he saw ethnic Indians besieged with problems such as stateless status, lack of basic education and housing, and religious conversion.

“I am not saying that Malaysians are racists. But definitely there are elements to prove institutionalised racism,” said the prominent human rights lawyer.

Besides his fact-finding mission, Suresh is here to meet potential co-claimants for the US$4 trillion suit to be re-filed by Hindraf chairman P Waythamoorthy against the British government.

Suresh arrived in Malaysia on Friday afternoon with another British human rights lawyer Imran Khan, who was refused entry.

Originally, Waythamoorthy filed the suit against the British government in London on Aug 31, 2007, seeking compensation for Indian Malaysians whose ancestors were brought into Malaya as indentured labourers.

However, it was stalled following the Malaysian government’s clampdown on Hindraf and the arrest of several lawyers under the Internal Security Act (ISA).

The suit laid claim that after granting independence to Malaya, the British had left the Indians without representation and at the mercy of the Umno government.

‘Hindraf is not racist’

In Kulim, Suresh met three teenage girls, aged 16 to 18, who never went to school because they did not have birth certificates or identity cards.

During a visit to Nibong Tebal later, he met an aging widow with 14 children living in a room. Her monthly income was the mere RM300 pension received for her years of service in a nearby plantation.

He also met an elderly couple. The Muslim man and his Hindu wife got married in 1966 and have 10 children and 45 grandchildren.
“But until today, the government has not recognised their marriage,” he said.

He said the couple’s children were forced to be registered as Muslims merely to obtain relevant identity certificates, although all of them were practicing Hindus.

In Kampung Medan, Petaling Jaya, Suresh met an Indian man, who was seriously injured during the racial attacks that happened there over a decade ago.

Suresh was dismayed that until today, the authorities had not compensated or, arrested and prosecuted anyone even though four people were murdered and 13 others severely wounded .

“There must be social justice, equality, freedom and civil liberty if a country wants to grow as a peaceful developed nation and democracy,” he stressed.

He rubbished claims by detractors that Hindraf was a racist organisation and its British suit was politically motivated.

“I know Waythamoorthy for years, he has never been racist. Hindraf struggle is not racist… it’s against racism. Imran and I would never have taken up the case if Hindraf was racist,” he pointed out.

He equated Hindraf struggle with that of the American black civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela’s anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa.

He said the suit was purely legal and not about political vengeance against the British or other quarters.
However, he acknowledged that a case of such magnitude would surely have political, socio-economic and cultural impacts.

“It’s unprecedented as never before a former colonial subject has filed a class action against the British government. We need thousands of documents to prove our case … it’s challenging,” he said.

Overwhelming number of clients

Meanwhile in Kuala Lumpur this morning, Suresh told reporters that he was restrained by the lawyer-client confidentiality from revealing the number of clients for the suit against the UK government.

However he added that the number was overwhelming
“There is no shortage of claimants despite the situation that they (the Indian minority) are in,” he said, adding that Wathamoorthy was the first claimant.

He also said that Hindraf’s lead counsel Imran would visit Malaysia again despite being deported last week
“Imran cannot be stopped unless he obstructs the police in a criminal case,” he said, urging lawyers in Malaysia to raise the issue on the basis that the claimants need to see their legal counsel. -- FMT

How Zul Noordin distorts the truth


In the year 638, after the death of the Prophet Muhammad, Umar, the third Caliph, led an army to conquer Jerusalem. The Christian leaders of Jerusalem invited Umar into the Church of Holy Sepulcher so that he could fulfil his prayers. Umar, however, refused to do so out of respect for the Christians. Instead, he chose to pray outside the church.

No Holds Barred
Raja Petra Kamarudin 


First, see the video below from minute 6:23.
At minute 6:23 in that video, the Member of Parliament for Kulim Bandar Baru, Zulkifli Noordin, said that the Caliph Umar refused to enter a church when invited to do so. This is proof, he said, that Muslims should not enter a church. 

He does not care about the law, argued Zul. Malaysian law may not have made it illegal or haram for Muslims to enter a church. But he is not concerned with that. He is guided by the example (sunah) of the Prophet’s Comrades (Sahabat Nabi) and Caliph Umar, one of the Prophet’s Comrades, refused to enter a church. This is all that matters.

Zul did not offer any details on this incident he quoted. He did not clarify when and where this incident was supposed to have happened. Either he is not clear about the incident or he is intentionally trying to mislead his audience.

Well, in that case, since Zul is either not too clear about the incident or refuses to clarify his statement with intent to mislead his audience, let me help with the clarification.

In the year 638, after the death of the Prophet Muhammad, Umar, the third Caliph, led an army to conquer Jerusalem. The Christian leaders of Jerusalem invited Umar into the Church of Holy Sepulcher so that he could fulfil his prayers. Umar, however, refused to do so out of respect for the Christians. Instead, he chose to pray outside the church.

Umar’s main concern was that, if he entered the church to pray, future generations of Muslims might misinterpret his action as he had ‘acquired’ or ‘captured’ the church and had turned it into a mosque. That was why he chose to pray outside the church rather than in the church. This was to safeguard the church and not trigger a precedence where churches are taken by force and turned into mosques.

That was the real reason why Umar refused to enter the Church of Holy Sepulcher to pray. He intentionally prayed outside the church to avoid any misunderstanding and conflict. He wanted to demonstrate that even though the Muslims had conquered Jerusalem, they did not disturb any churches or took these churches by force. Churches would remain churches and Muslims would have to build their own mosques if they wanted to pray.

I don’t wear a songkok or white skullcap like Zul. But I know my history. And that was the history of what happened when Umar conquered Jerusalem. And that was the real reason why Umar declined the invitation to enter the church to pray. It was to avoid any misunderstanding and conflict, and not as Zul is tying to mislead us.

Malaysia Looks West for Investments

LONDON — With Europe’s economy mired in a debt crisis, governments in the region have been looking east for a helping hand, tapping the likes of China and Japan to buy their bonds and step up investments.
 
Queen Elizabeth met with Najib Razak, Malaysia's prime minister, and his wife, Rosmah Mansor, at Buckingham Palace. 

But at least one Asian country — Malaysia — still sees value in turning the opposite way, to enhance opportunities for its more assertive multinationals as well as bolstering investments from the West.

The Malaysian prime minister, Najib Razak, led a large official delegation last month to Britain via Turkmenistan, to capitalize on his country’s strong economy and investment inflows and assuage concerns about political agitation in the multicultural Southeast Asian country.

In past years, “it was just ‘please come to Malaysia,’ ” the trade minister, Mustapa Mohamed, said during an interview on the trip. “Now we are going to foreign countries to help provide access to Malaysian companies.”

Part of the sales pitch is selling the economic recovery story. The economy grew by 7.2 percent last year after shrinking 1.7 percent in 2009, and the government anticipates expansion of about 5 percent this year and next. The Malaysian inflation rate has been creeping up, though it remains moderate by global standards, at an annual rate of 3.5 percent in June.

But officials were also eager to ease potential concerns about the Malaysian political challenges.
“I think many investors have been to Malaysia, they understand the complications in Malaysia — multiracial, multireligious,” Mr. Mohamed said. “We need to have laws in place to ensure that things don’t get out of hand.”

The Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections, or Bersih, an amalgam of nongovernmental and activist groups, has pushed for changes in electoral law from the coalition government led by the United Malays National Organization, which has dominated politics since independence from Britain in 1957.

Bersih was declared illegal July 1, after which hundreds of activists were rounded up. Most of them were quickly released, but some were held longer. On July 9, thousands of protesters defied a government ban and held a large street protest, during which the police fired tear gas and water cannons and arrested about 1,700.

“We have to engage,” Mr. Mohamed said, “we have to continue changing, reform.”

Underneath the political tension is an economy that has proved increasingly attractive to overseas capital.
Nonequity foreign direct investment inflows in 2010 were $9.1 billion, according to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, up from $1.4 billion a year earlier. The government is confident that it can retain that momentum.

“It’s not having an impact on investor confidence,” Mr. Mohamed said of the recent disturbances.
Ian Bryson, an analyst in Singapore at Control Risks, a consulting firm, said that there was less political risk in Malaysia than most of its regional peers and that the country benefited from relatively low corruption and a fairly dependable judiciary.

“I don’t think the current political agitation is pivotal or that the country is at a tipping point,” he said. “Malaysians are not interested in a full-scale upheaval.”

“The opposition is factious but vociferous,” he said, adding that splinter, conservative groups from the United Malays group still had the potential to destabilize the governing coalition in the next election, which is expected to be called in 2013.

On the economic front, Mr. Bryson cited concerns about limits on equity ownership in certain sectors — favoring ethnic Malays known as Bumiputera — and the employment of foreigners. He also noted broader skills shortages and restrictive local hiring and firing rules. “It’s generally very open to business, but with some cultural and sociopolitical limitations,” he said.

A report from the World Bank’s private sector arm, the International Finance Corporation, ranked Malaysia 21st out of 183 economies globally for the ease of doing business. The country scored lower for starting businesses and enforcing contracts.

Government Will Do Its Best To Improve Electoral System, Says PM

PORT KLANG, Aug 17 (Bernama) -- The government will do its best to improve the electoral system in the country, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said towards this end, the government had agreed to set up a parliamentary select committee and that this showed its sincerity in wanting elections that were clean and fair.

The Barisan Nasional (BN) government was unafraid of changes to the electoral system as it wanted to ensure that the government of the day was returned by the people's mandate, he told a people's gathering for the breaking of the Ramadan fast at the Sri Perantau apartments here today which was attended by some 10,000 people.

Najib said that if the elections in the country were crooked, obviously the BN would not have surrendered Selangor to the opposition after the last general election.

The prime minister also reminded the people not to take for granted the peace and harmony they were enjoying or look down on the achievements that have been attained.

Instead, Malaysians should continue to preserve and value the peace and harmony they were enjoying, he said.

Najib said he could empathise with Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron who had to face riots in his country recently.

Cameron had said Britain, a country that practised parliamentary democracy, had lost the moral high ground because of a 'sick" segment of society which resorted to wanton rioting and looting in the aftermath of the killing of a youth by a policeman.

On Umno, Najib, who is also Umno president and Selangor Umno chief, said the government was willing to consider requests from the people of Selangor as voiced out by Kapar Umno for the 1Malaysia retail outlets and 1Malaysia clinics to be opened in the state.

He also extended his gratitude for the large turnout despite poison pen letters going around that he would not be turning up for the function.

Also present was Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister Datuk Seri Noh Omar, who is also Selangor Umno deputy chief.