Share |

Friday, 10 October 2014

A-G decided on Ibrahim Ali case, says Nancy Shukri

Nancy wants Malaysians to accept that Ibrahim Ali was not charged as the context of his speech was in line with the 'spirit of the Federal Constitution'. - The Malaysian Insider pic, October 9, 2014.Nancy Shukri sought tonight to deflect public outrage over Putrajaya's inaction to prosecute Datuk Ibrahim Ali for his threat to burn Malay bibles, saying it was the Attorney-General's Chambers decision and blamed the opposition for making political capital from it.

The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department blamed Malaysians on social media for spreading articles, saying "irresponsible quarters" had only taken excerpts from her answer in Parliament to "create misinterpretation and misunderstanding".

"The irresponsible quarters only quoted parts of the answer that it creates misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the real meaning intended," the minister from Sarawak said in a statement.

Nancy explained that any decision to charge a person or not, in court, is subject to evidence and facts, and has nothing to do with a person's religious background or political inclination.

She said that the decision to not charge Ibrahim under the Sedition Act was made fairly and without favouring any parties to ensure justice for the victim, witness, accused and the public.

"The decision by the Attorney-General Chambers to not prosecute Ibrahim was because the context of his speech was in line with the spirit in Article 11(4) of the Federal Constitution.

"Hence, the decision to not charge Ibrahim was taken after considering the outcome of the investigation by the police, she added.

Nancy hoped that people could see the government's transparency in handling the legal process and for them to stay calm and not to issue statements or do things that could undermine harmony and hurt the feelings of the country's multi-racial community. – October 9, 2014.

- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/read-my-answer-in-full-says-nancy-defending-reply-on-ibrahim-ali#sthash.1NMpJxJt.dpuf

No comments: