The Taliban are using the pop singer’s striptease to attack the schoolgirl they tried to murder. Sami Yousafzai reports on the backlash.
There’s no doubt that Madonna was trying to be helpful a few days ago when she performed a striptease
for an audience in Los Angeles. The question is how carefully the pop
entertainer considered the consequences before she shucked off her
costume to reveal the name Malala emblazoned in big letters across her
back, between her bra strap and her thong. The crowd at the Staples
Center applauded and cheered, of course. But the response has been
decidedly mixed in Pakistan, where 15-year-old Malala Yousafzai
(no relation) attended school until Oct. 9, when a Taliban gunman shot
her in the head for her outspoken public advocacy of women’s education.
The
extremists pounced on the video as soon as it was posted. The
schoolgirl’s shooting had provoked an unprecedentedly fierce backlash
against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Now Madonna’s performance
allowed the militants to recast Malala as a symbol of Western immodesty
and immorality. Hospitalized in Britain, with a tracheotomy tube down
her throat, she was in no position to protest. Kakar Khan, a former
senior official in the Afghan Taliban’s Information Ministry, sent me a
long email saying, “If you have any doubts about Malala’s game, you must
watch Madonna strip sing.” He urges readers of his Facebook page to
view the video—but not if family members are present: “Do not try to
open it,” he warns. “Total strip and vulgar.”
Many
Taliban say Malala’s Western supporters only prove she was a bad
person. “If Malala were a good Muslim, such terrible people would not
raise their voices for her—people like Obama, [Angelina] Jolie,
Madonna, [Afghan President Hamid] Karzai, and [Pakistani President Asif
Ali] Zardari, says Ghazi Wazir, a TTP member living in Karachi.
“Whoever shot Malala would not be happy for hurting the girl, but they
would be happy for any pain they could inflict on Obama, Zardari,
Karzai, and the rest of the world’s top enemies of islam.” He says he
has seen photos of Madonna on the night of her pro-Malala performance.
Even
people from far outside the Taliban’s ranks are denouncing the singer’s
performance. “I condemned the attack on Malala,” says Omar Mansoor
Ansari, who worked as the media director for Dr. Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai’s
campaign during Afghanistan’s 2009 presidential race. “At the same
time, I also condemn Madonna’s song for Malala. Those who targeted
Malala created a hugely negative message about Muslims, but Madonna has
spread the anti-Islam and anti-Pashtun propaganda even wider by her
song.”
Not
satisfied with using Madonna in efforts to discredit Malala, some
Pakistani Taliban are weaving bizarre conspiracy theories around the
case. One TTP commander, currently living underground in Karachi and
asking not to be named, claims that the Malala shooting was all a big
hoax. “It was just play-acting,” he says. “If she was wounded in the
head as it was said in the media, the doctors would have been forced to
shave her head, but in photos her hair is perfect. She was never wounded.”
Zaman
Taraki, a relatively moderate TTP sympathizer living in London,
concedes that the shooting was genuine, but he insists that the attack
was a plot by Punjabi members of Inter-Services Intelligence, the
Pakistan government’s spy directorate, to rally worldwide support for military action
in the TTP’s tribal-areas strongholds. But it’s no use, he says. U.S.
support for action against the TTP “would only help the religious
fanatics,” he says. “The Pakistani Army would never go after the Taliban
in the tribal areas.”
Not satisfied with using Madonna in efforts to discredit Malala, some TTP members are weaving bizarre conspiracy theories around the case.
The
backlash against Malala actually began even before Madonna’s appearance
in Los Angeles. I visited a madrassa in Mardan, a 90-minute drive from
Malala’s Swat Valley hometown of Mingora. “There is no doubt that Islam
never allows the killing of anyone under age,” says Maulana Ali Haqqani,
45, as his class of 15 students listened intently. “The question isn’t
whether what happened to Malala was right or wrong. The question is why
this incident is fueling anti-Islam feelings. The attack on Malala
earned deep and rapid condemnation worldwide. So why does no one speak
out against the killing of innocent kids in the tribal areas,
Afghanistan, and Palestine?”
Haqqani
blames practically everyone he can think of: not only the U.S. and
Israeli armed forces, but Malala’s father for encouraging her to speak
her mind, the late U.S. diplomat Richard Holbrooke for agreeing to meet
with her and thus helping to make her a target of the TTP’s rage, the
entire world for supposedly ignoring atrocities that are committed
against Muslims. “Thousands of Muslim kids were burned alive in Burma,”
he says, referring to violence that killed an undetermined number of men, women, and children
last June. “Where were the people who are now at the front lines of the
U.S.-led media war against Pakistan’s religious elements?” He takes off
his glasses and looks proudly to his students. “I agree there is more
sympathy for Malala than we thought, but it is Western media using her
case and keeping it alive.”
In
the end, there’s always a way to deflect the burden of responsibility
to the West. “The Malala incident helped the West by successfully
diverting attention from anti-Islam movies,” says Kakar Khan, evidently
referring to the idiotic YouTube trailer for Innocence of Muslims, which set off furious protests
across the Muslim world in September. “Malala was a poor and innocent
girl, unwittingly forced to play her part in this satanic drama. Now her
role is at an end, and the play will go on, costing lots of Muslim
blood.” The tragedy will continue. That much seems beyond dispute.
No comments:
Post a Comment