The Malaysian Insider
By Lisa J. Ariffin
By Lisa J. Ariffin
PUTRAJAYA,
July 9 — The Internal Security Act (ISA) was repealed because it no
longer provided a political edge to the government of the day, Datuk
Seri Najib Razak said today.
“We
abolished ISA because it doesn’t help us politically. You don’t kill
anyone politically by putting them in ISA,” Najib said today during the
opening of a dialogue with public service personnel here.
“It only enhances them by putting them in ISA,” he added.
Najib stressed, however, that “all the (existing) ISA detainees’ positions still remain”.
The
premier also said he had decided to remove the Emergency Ordinance
(EO), which had allowed for indefinite detention without trial, as it
has been rendered irrelevant by technology.
“Previously, when someone commits an offence, we would catch them and send them far away,” he said.
“Now,
there is no use for that because when that person is away, he can use
his cell phone to continue his work. That’s why we got rid of EO,” he
added.
On
September 15 last year, Najib had announced his plan to repeal the ISA
and the three Emergency Declarations in his Malaysia Day address to the
nation.
The
ISA was originally drafted to address the communist insurgency of its
day, but was later said to have been subverted into a tool for the
government to stifle political dissent.
It
developed notoriety when it was used during the 1987 political
crackdown known as “Ops Lalang”, when over a hundred people — primarily
opposition leaders and activists — were arrested under the law.
Following
Najib’s announcement, the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) government
admitted to having used the ISA in the past for “wrongful reasons” but
urged their detractors to look forward instead of dwelling on history.
Najib
came to power in April 2009 with the promise of reviewing the ISA but
decided on doing away with the security law that critics say has been
abused by Barisan Nasional (BN) for political purposes.
But
his administration replaced the ISA with the Security Offences (Special
Measures) Act, which has since come under similar criticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment