The Sun
by R. Nadeswaran
by R. Nadeswaran
PETALING
JAYA (July 2, 2012): The changes seemed minor – some colours and shades
switched, and a few words altered. But the implications to the PJ Draft
Local Plan Two (RTPJ 2) were staggering as the value of land was
increased by several hundred million ringgit, making millionaires of
those engaged in such malpractice.
In
what has been described as the largest land fraud in the country,
Petaling Jaya City Councillor Derek Fernandez charged that irresponsible
people within the council changed the plan to cause substantial
increase in the land value.
Using
the controversial change in status of the PKNS field in Kelana Jaya in
the RTPJ2 as an example, he said as recreational land, it would fetch
about RM20 per square foot but as commercial land, it can go as much as
RM500 psf – a 25-fold increase.
The
local plan, he said, was amended unlawfully twice, with some 220
unauthorised and illegal amendments involving 40 plots of land including
the PKNS field.
Most
of the amendments had been done in complete violation of the law and
hidden from the councillors who were “fed a steady diet of lies” at
every meeting of the council’s One-Stop Centre which scrutinises
applications for development.
In
a lengthy submission to the Selangor Select Committee on Competency,
Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) on Friday, Fernandez said there
were three different versions of the local plans in existence which are
purported to be legal and which carry the government gazette
notification number.
“These
amendments were done by people who knew about the procedures involved
but yet chose to ignore them. The only valid local plan is the one
assented to by the (Selangor) State Assembly and the law requires the
MBPJ (PJ City Council) to publish (in the gazette) the assent and make
it available for public inspection.
This
means the other two plans ‘pretending’ that they have been assented by
the State Assembly are false, deceptive and the perpetrators have
committed a (criminal) offence,” Fernandez said.
He
also raised four questions which he said Selcat – which had hearings
for two days last week, and is set for another one on Thursday – should
investigate:
Who
ordered MBPJ officers to go to the Selangor Valuation Department to
carry out the illegal amendments with the intention of enhancing the
value of the land for certain interests?
How
did the persons involved know how to amend the zoning of 40 plots of
land unless the land owners or those who had interests in the said plots
contacted the officers?
Who gave the list of 220 amendments to be made?
How
did these owners get the land and how was the land converted and the
titles issued which are inconsistent with the zoning under the local
plan?
Outlining
the methodology prescribed in the legislation, Fernandez in his
submissions, said planning aims to provide sustainable development
irrespective of the status of the land use.
In
the event a proposal for re-zoning is made which is different from the
title, the affected person can object and if his or her objections are
dismissed by the state hearing committee and the local plan is assented
to by the state authority, he can seek compensation. If, however he does
not object, he is taken as having agreed with the zoning change.
This has a direct relation to the issue, yet, there were no objections before the local plan was gazetted.
Requesting
Selcat to carry out further investigations, Fernandez said: “You will
find that many plots of land are stolen from public open spaces,
recreational land and land meant to be surrendered to the local
authority for public purposes.
“Even
land surrendered for public purposes by developers and not used for the
purpose were stolen and later alienated to cronies, avoiding public
hearings.
Magically,
titles later appear for these plots and that is how the public is
robbed. That is why the planning records are different for those lands.”
RTPJ2
became mired in controversy when documents referred to by the Selangor
Town and Country Planning found the public field owned by PKNS was zoned
as a recreational area, whilst the documents referred to by MBPJ
indicated it was a commercial zone.
No comments:
Post a Comment