Wah. Whaddya gotta do to get arrested in this country? (not moderate your comments? haha)
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz sparked an uproar in Parliament today when he said “judiciary fixer” VK Lingam had been let off the hook “because he had broken no law.”
Nazri also suggested that Lingam breached no laws as he might “have just acted to fix the appointment of judges as if he was brokering the appointment of senior judges to impress people”.
“I am not denying that it was Lingam in the tape. But I am also saying that there are a lot of conmen in this world. Who knows he might have just acted when he was calling the so-called judges to impress,” said Nazri in his ministerial winding-up speech on the 2010 Budget debate.
O_o
I dunno. Sounds to me like Nazri just said a big f* you (language I tend to associate with him) to the Royal Commission:
The Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Lingam video clip has found that it was former Chief Justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim who was talking to prominent lawyer Datuk V.K. Lingam on the telephone. Sources said the five-man panel also found that the video clip was authentic and that the conversation was true in substance.
What does that mean? One day, say, a Royal Commission will find that 2 MACC guys pushed Teoh Beng Hock out of a window.
Then will Nazri will say: Ah you know what, sometimes, these MACC ‘flers like to play. Maybe they were just acting to impress their boss. No further action.
>:|
So? This is 1Malaysia? Where we are all 1Crooks that must stick 1Together? Why on earth would Nazri and BN defend Lingam? Just too many skeletons that this tip of the iceberg will let out of the closet?
Mixed metaphors aside, I agree with Pratamad - we should have a KPK with some cajones.
No comments:
Post a Comment