Pro ISA group makes its presence felt

Selangor Sultan unhappy with politicians exploiting race

By Leslie Lau

Consultant Editor

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 2 — The Sultan of Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah says he is disappointed with the manner in which some politicians exploit racial issues for their own agenda.

Speaking to The Star newspaper in an interview published today, the Sultan's remarks comes amid a heated debate sparked by a raft of recent public comments about race relations and the concept of Malay Supremacy.

His comments are also the latest sign of a more vocal royalty which appears to be filling the vacuum left by a lack of political leadership.

The Sultan said he was disturbed by how some politicians preferred to dwell on what he called trivial issues instead of focusing on dealing with the economy.

"Malaysia belongs to all races, not just the Malays. The country is what it is today because of the contributions of all races and that is something we must acknowledge," he said.

He also acknowledged, however, that it was his initiative to have the recent Conference of Rulers issue a statement defending the social contract, which has also been the subject of roiling debate recently.

"People need to understand that the social contract is the primary basis for the formation of Malaysia. Let's not debate it because it is better for the rakyat to understand the history behind the social contract," he said.

He said the rights of the Malays were well protected and could not be taken away without the consent of the Rulers.

But he said the Rulers also felt that non-Malays should not feel apprehensive over their rights as these rights are also guaranteed.

Umno supreme council to discuss by-election, Zaid

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 2 — The Umno supreme council meeting tonight is expected to discuss several matters including the Kuala Terengganu parliamentary by-election and action on former minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Zaid Ibrahim.

Umno information chief Tan Sri Muhammad Muhd Taib said the meeting, to be chaired by Umno president Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, would likely discuss preparations for the by-election for the Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat although the Election Commission has yet to fix a date for the by-election.

The seat fell vacant following the death of Deputy Education Minister Datuk Razali Ismail, 59, while playing badminton in Genting Highlands last Friday.

Muhammad said the meeting was also expected to discuss action to be taken on Zaid for attending the recent Parti Keadilan Rakyat Congress. — Bernama

Soi Lek: I am not challenging Malay rights

Dr Chua says he accepts the leadership of Malay leaders. — Picture by Choo Choy May

Dr Chua says he accepts the leadership of Malay leaders. — Picture by Choo Choy May

By Shannon Teoh

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 2 — MCA deputy president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek today clarified that he is not challenging the position of the Malay Rulers, Bumiputera rights or Bahasa Malaysia but questioned the use of the phrase “Ketuanan Melayu”, or Malay Supremacy.

"We must change the power-sharing concept in the Barisan Nasional as the term ‘Ketuanan Melayu’ gives the impression that other parties in the BN are slaves," he said, referring to Umno's dominance in the governing coalition.

"We accept the leadership of Malay leaders. But it cannot be denied that certain parties exploit the term," Dr Chua said.

Yesterday the Young Malay Graduates Movement (GGMM), a Malay rights group, demanded Dr Chua pay RM2 million in compensation for allegedly questioning the special position of the Malays.

Dr Chua said in his speech, at a recent advertising awards night, that by extending this phrase to all aspects of Malay rights within the power-sharing concept of the BN, it gave the impression that other parties in the BN were slaves to Umno.

The position of the Bumiputeras and Bahasa Malaysia, however, was not to be questioned as it is enshrined in the federal constitution.

"I used the term in the context of power-sharing in the BN, which has been exploited by certain quarters to gain support from the people.

"It has no connection whatsoever to challenging the Malay Rulers and the special rights of Bumiputeras and Bahasa Malaysia as the national language," he stated.

He gave examples of the exploitation of the term “Ketuanan Melayu”.

"During general elections, the opposition tells non-Malays ‘supporting BN is supporting Ketuanan Melayu’. So how do we explain to them in the short campaign period?"

On the other hand, he said there were also some NGOs and Umno politicians who are now accusing him of challenging the special position of the Malays for their own purposes.

Yesterday, Umno Youth chief hopeful Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir accused Dr Chua of trying to be a "hero" by challenging Malay rights.

Dr Chua shot back today, saying that there is no reason for him to be a hero as his party's polls were already done while "they are the ones facing a party election”.

"Whoever says I am being a hero should look in the mirror," he said.

He also touched on Mukhriz's call for the abolition of vernacular schools, saying that it has been an issue that has been debated since he joined politics in the ‘80s.

"It is very clear that there are constitutional guarantees of freedom of choice in education and freedom to pursue mother tongue education.

"I am sure MCA will object if the dual system is being replaced. We respect the constitution and it is provided for by the constitution," he added.

He hoped all parties would accept his clarification and read his speech in full.

"But they have the right to do something and I have the right to defend what I believe is true. They have the right to speak out, I cannot obstruct that," he said referring to GGMM as well as Malay-language newspapers such as Utusan Malaysia.

"Utusan, as usual as a BM paper, it brings up issues which are important to the Malays, and Chinese papers do the same and give publicity to issues that are important to the Chinese," he added.

Dr Chua was pressed also on whether he had the backing of his party in his stand as it had been reported in Utusan that party president Datuk Ong Tee Keat said that it was not the stand of the party.

"You have to read the Chinese papers. In Utusan he said that my views are personal. But in the Chinese press, he said he was satisfied and proud that my views were in line with his. So I leave it to the readers to decide which one reflects the stand of my president," he said.

DATUK MUKHRIZ - ONLY UMNO CAN SPEAK, OTHER BN COMPONENTS MUST LISTEN & OBEY

Datuk Mukhriz Tun Mahathir reiterated today that since the Malay leaders are silent and tolerant towards non-Malays, Barisan Nasional component leaders seems to be raising the issue of 'Malay supremacy' of late.

Datuk Mukhriz further stated that only UMNO can voice anything while the BN component parties must keep quiet and obey UMNO and must concentrate on their own community problems and issues.

Datuk Mukhriz added that non-UMNO members, including BN component officials must not deliberate any issue pertaining to the Malays, especially questioning the Malay supremacy or special rights enjoyed by the Malays that is enshined by the Federal Constitution. He further quoted that recent statements made by component leaders would only create a tiff and will jeopardise the cordial and friendly situation enjoyed among the component parties.

The UMNO leaders have been tolerant so far but recent statements just insinuate the Malay feelings. Component party leaders need to avoid speak on this issue which hurt the feelings of UMNO and Malays. Datuk Mukhriz stated that the issue of Malay supremacy have been misunderstood and what they should do is to find ways of uniting the Malaysian society. When these component leaders make these statements, it shows that they know nothing of our history or maybe they are trying to act as champions to their own community.

The only way to resolve this issue is to have a singular uniform education system which will create greater interaction which will overcome our present predicament.

Datuk Mukhriz is vying to be the UMNO Youth chief in the forthcoming UMNO polls in March 2009. Datuk Mukhriz is the son of the former premier of Malaysia.

What Is The Pakatan Doing?

I am travelling today for a symposium overseas and had much to do and deal with before I left. Time constraints prevented me from writing an opinion piece for Disquiet in print. My apologies.

If I had had the time, I would have written on what I think and how I feel about the Pakatan Rakyat, more particularly PKR, offering a Deputy Chief Minister’s position to Datuk Arif Shah Omar Shah (if reports are true).

I do not think this is the kind of example that the Pakatan wants to set and I am wondering how it is that those who lead the coalition could have even thought of making such an offer (if true). There has already been intense debate about whether cross-overs should be accepted as a point of principle, with the DAP having been very clear about its disagreement. Accepting a cross-over and offering him a plum position in the administration is something that far more extreme.

There are several ways this can be looked at. What does Arif Shah offer that so many of those who have struggled for so long in the pursuit of change-for-the-better cannot? His UMNO credentials? His network of UMNO supporters? The insult his defection would amount to?

Even if the defection of UMNO were to be the result of his defection, and I do not necessarily think that would be the case, is that worth the message it sends out about the Pakatan: that the Pakatan is a coalition that is prepared to pay whatever it takes to get where it wants to. Because if a deal has in fact been struck with Arif Shah, that is what the Pakatan is doing.

And it would seem that that is what the Pakatan has become.

What happened to the adherence to principle that underlay the Pakatan’s election campaign? Has the value of principle lessened since? Have we forgotten the kind of campaign that Arif Shah was associated with in Permatang Pauh, the obscenities, the racial slurs and incitement, the entire circus? Are we overlooking the fact that Arif Shah wants to leave UMNO for the way his has been treated (according to media reports) rather than for his rejection of UMNO’s ideology?

And above all, has Anwar Ibrahim forgotten what it is that motivated the rakyat on March 8th? It was not blind ambition, it was the pursuit of a better Malaysia.

How Arif Shah becoming a Deputy Chief Minister of Penang takes us closer to that objective is something beyond my comprehension. Even if it leads to the taking of Federal Government, I am certain that must have something to do with the offer, I question whether a Federal Government achieved on the back of personal interests is a government I want.

Malik Imtiaz Sarwar

Mac 2009

1. Negara tertunggu-tunggu Mac 2009 di waktu mana peralihan kuasa dikatakan akan berlaku.

2. Kepercayaan bahawa ini akan berlaku diasaskan kepada pengumuman oleh Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi yang dia akan serah jawatannya kepada Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak pada tarikh tersebut. Abdullah juga menyatakan yang dia tidak akan bertanding jawatan Presiden Umno dalam pemilihan ahli Majlis Tertinggi Umno pada Mac 2009. Justeru tidak ada bahagian yang mencalonkan Abdullah sebagai Presiden.

3. Biasanya sesiapa yang menjadi Presiden Umno akan menjadi Perdana Menteri jika Barisan Nasional menang dan menjadi parti yang terbesar dalam Parlimen. Tetapi ini tradisi sahaja. Jika diberi kepercayaan oleh majoriti ahli Dewan Rakyat, yang bukan Presiden Umno dan Pengerusi BN juga boleh jadi Perdana Menteri.

4. Dalam parti-parti lain di Malaysia terdapat Menteri Besar dan Ketua Menteri yang tidak terdiri daripada Presiden parti. Demikian sementara Haji Hadi adalah Presiden PAS, yang menjadi Menteri Besar ialah Datuk Seri Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat.

5. Dalam DAP sementara pemimpin besarnya ialah Lim Kit Siang tetapi dia tidak jadi Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang. Keadaan yang sama terdapat dalam parti Keadilan di Selangor. Bahkan jika ketua Pakatan ialah Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, dia tidak mengetuai mana-mana Kerajaan yang dikuasai oleh Pakatan.

6. Berita angin sudah berkembang bahawa walaupun Najib akan jadi Presiden Umno, tidak semestinya dia akan jadi Perdana Menteri. Berita yang didengar ialah Abdullah masih berminat meneruskan jawatan Perdana Menteri.

7. Jika diambil kira sikap pemimpin dan ramai ahli Umno, kemungkinan ini berlaku tidak mustahil. Mereka tidak akan menentang Abdullah kerana mereka amat selesa dengan kepimpinan beliau dan nikmat tertentu yang mereka dapati darinya.

8. Tetapi pengekalan Abdullah sebagai PM tetap akan menyemarakkan kebencian rakyat kepada Umno dan BN. Politik akan bergolak sepanjang masa sehingga pilihanraya. Dan apabila datang pilihanraya percayalah majoriti rakyat akan tolak Umno dan BN.

9. Rakyat tidak berminat dengan parti-parti lawan tetapi mereka tidak ada pilihan. Umno sudah jadi parti pimpinan ramai perasuah dan jika Umno menang bersama BN, maka yang akan memerintah Malaysia ialah orang yang menjadi Perdana Menteri dan Menteri melalui rasuah dan mereka ini tetap akan amalkan rasuah dalam Kerajaan untuk dapat balik "pelaburan" mereka dan lebih daripada itu.

10. Jika rakyat Malaysia ingin elak daripada nasib buruk ini menimpa negara, rakyat perlu beritahu UMNO dan kepimpinannya awal-awal lagi iaitu rakyat akan tolak UMNO jika orang yang diketahui umum terlibat dengan rasuah dipilih sebagai pemimpin UMNO pada pemilihan Majlis Tertinggi Mac 2009.

11. Demikian juga jika Abdullah cuba terus menjadi Perdana Menteri selepas Mac 2009, rakyat harus beri mesej yang jelas yang UMNO serta BN akan dikalahkan.

12. UMNO pimpinan perasuah dan perosak tidak harus diberi kuasa memimpin negara yang tercinta ini.

13. Kerosakan yang telah dilakukan selama lima tahun Abdullah menerajui Kerajaan Malaysia sudah cukup buruk. Fikirkanlah akan keburukan yang akan dilakukan kepada UMNO dan negara apabila seluruh kepimpinan Kerajaan terdiri daripada perasuah.

14. Dalam UMNO sekarang sudah ada orang yang berpendapat kalau ini adalah kali terakhir mereka akan dapat sogokan, lebih baiklah mereka menerima. Sekurang-kurang mereka akan kecapi "nikmat" sekali. Mungkin tidak akan ada peluang lagi. Apa jadi kepada UMNO, bangsa dan negara adalah masalah lain, bukan masalah mereka. Bagi mereka "nikmat" tidak boleh ditolak, walaupun hanya RM100.

15. Bagi mereka ini generasi akan datang akan kutuk mereka apabila orang Melayu di Malaysia sudah jadi seperti orang Melayu di Singapura di mana mereka menjadi "hamba" kepada kaum-kaum lain. Inilah nasib yang menunggu orang Melayu kerana lebih sedia disogok daripada mempertahan dan memelihara kuasa bangsa.

Muslims condemn Mumbai attacks, but uneasy about bloodshed linked to their religion

Suspect named as Azam Amir Qasab 21 years old, fluent English speaker Told police he is from Faridkot village, in Pakistan's Punjab province said the attackers took orders from handlers in Pakistan

RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) _ Muslims from the Middle East to Britain and Austria condemned Sunday the Mumbai shooting rampage by suspected Islamic militants as senseless terrorism, but also found themselves on the defensive once again about bloodshed linked to their religion.

Intellectuals and community leaders called for greater efforts to combat religious fanaticism.

Indian police said Sunday that the only surviving gunman told them he belongs to the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba. The group is seen as a creation of Pakistani intelligence to help fight India in the disputed Kashmir region. Another group, Jaish-e-Mohammed, has also operated in Kashmir. Both are reported to be linked to al-Qaida.

Ten gunmen attacked 10 targets in the three-day assault including a Jewish community center and luxury hotels in India's commercial hub. More than 170 people were killed.

Many Muslims said they are worried such carnage is besmirching their religion.

"The occupation of the synagogue and killing people in hotels tarnishes the Muslim faith," said Kazim al-Muqdadi, a political science lecturer at Baghdad University. "Anyone who slaughters people and screams 'Allahu Akbar' (God is Great) is sick and ignorant."

In Britain, home to nearly two million Muslims, a spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, Inayat Bunglawala, said that "a handful of terrorists like this bring the entire faith into disrepute."

A previously unknown Muslim group, Deccan Mujahideen, claimed responsibility for the attacks. The name suggests origins in India.

Pakistan has denied involvement and demanding that India provide proof. In Pakistan, Jamaat-ud Dawa, an Islamist group believed to have ties to Lashkar-e-Taiba, denounced the killing of civilians.

In Islamic extremist Web forums, some praised the Mumbai attacks, including the targeting of Jews.

A man identified as Sheik Youssef al-Ayeri said the killings are in line with Islam.

"It's all right for Muslims to set the infidels' castles on fire, drown them with water .... and take some of them as prisoners, whether young or old, women or men, because it is one of many ways to beat them," he wrote in the al-Fallujah forum.

In the Gaza Strip, the territory's Islamic militant Hamas rulers declined comment. Hamas has carried out scores of suicide attacks in Israel, killing hundreds of civilians in recent years. However, Hamas has said it does not want to get involved in conflicts elsewhere.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad referred to the attacks as terrorism, but added that the violence is rooted in "unjust policies" aimed at destabilizing the region. He did not elaborate.

India is seen by many in the Arab and Muslim world as a Western ally. For example, Israel has become an important arms supplier to India, angering Muslim Pakistan.

Saudi Arabia said in a statement carried earlier this week by the Saudi Press Agency that it "strongly condemns and denounces this criminal act." An editorial Friday in Saudi's English-language Arab News said that "no civilized person ... can be anything but revolted and sickened by the terrorist attacks in Mumbai."

However, Jonathan Fighel, an Israeli counterterrorism expert, said Saudi organizations have been funneling money to Muslim militants in Kashmir.

"This demonstrates exactly the double game and, I would say, the hypocrisy of the Saudi regime," said Fighel of the Israel-based International Institute for Counter-Terrorism.

Throughout the Muslim world, the attacks set off soul-searching.

"I think that Muslims should raise their voice against such actions. They should forge a coalition to fight such phenomena, because it harms them and damages their image," said Ali Abdel Muhsen, 22, a Muslim engineering student in the West Bank city of Nablus.

Muslims and Arabs must confront the violence "that is taking place in our name and in the name of our (Islamic) tenets," wrote Khaled al-Jenfawi, a columnist for Kuwait's Al-Seyassah daily.

"Unfortunately, we have yet to see a distinguished popular condemnation in the traditional Arab or Muslim communities that strongly rejects what is happening in the name of Islam or Arab nationalism," wrote al-Jenfawi.
___
Reporters across the Middle East and Europe contributed to this report.

Invitation to House of Lords (London) on Issues Affecting Ethnic Indian Community

On behalf of friends of Minority Communities in Malaysia I would like to invite you to a briefing at the House of Lords, Room G.

We will be addressed by Mr. Waytha Moorthy, a Human Rights Advocate from Malaysia and four representatives from a number of independent bodies from Malaysia and the United States of America. They will discuss the grave difficulties and threats facing Minority Communities in Malaysia, in particular the largest Minority Community, the Hindu/Sikh Community.

It is crucial the alleged persecution of Minorities be high-lighted to the Democratic World.

The event will take place on 8th December 2008 in Room G at the House of Lords. It will start at 11.00 a.m. and conclude at 1.00 p.m. Light refreshments will be served.

Please contact Mr. Waytha Moorthy on waythamoorthy@googlemail.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it or 07875653848 for your attendance.

With kind regards.

Yours humbly,

Baroness Verma, FRSA

From Raja Petra

NO HOLDS BARRED Raja Petra Kamarudin Religious superstition and persecution never ceases to amaze me. Take the case of Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow of Mogadishu , Somalia . On 27th October 2008, 13-year old Aisha was killed. She was killed when 1,000 people stoned her to death. And she was stoned to death because three men had raped her. She was raped, so they accused of adultery. Imagine a 13-year old girl killed in a most brutal manner because she was raped by three men. Should it not be the three men who should have instead been stoned to death? And do you not wonder why Islam suffers from a serious image problem? Muslims should take stock of what they are doing and understand the disservice they are doing to Islam. Our religious rehabilitation by the Kamunting detention camp started on the Tuesday after Deepavali. The highlight of the sessions was the "nasi tomato" and the chicken wing in a plastic bag that they served for lunch, courtesy of JAKIM but paid for by the Malaysian taxpayers, 90% who are Chinese. The JAKIM ustaz told us that Islam is the true religion and that all other religions are false. We were reminded not to believe in or follow other religions, which are not accepted and recognized by God. Only the Koran is the true Holy Book and was sent to us by God through the Prophet Muhammad. All other books are false and were created by man and did not come from God. We must also not copy or ape the non-Muslims as that will lead us astray and we will become an apostate if we act like the kafir. He did not, however, give any examples on what would be considered acting like a kafir. In the meantime, in another incident that happened outside the Kamunting detention camp, an UKM lecturer explained that Muslims should not do yoga or meditate, as the origin of this is Hinduism. Muslims who do yoga or meditate would be led astray, argued the wise man from UKM. He then asked the religious scholars to come out with a fatwa or decree banning Muslims from doing yoga or meditating. It is ironical that the JAKIM ustaz who visited Kamunting chose that subject matter to kick off our religious rehabilitation program. The article that got me into trouble with the government and which resulted in my detention under the Internal Security Act said exactly the same thing. I pointed out that the Friday prayer sermons run down the other religions. I also argued that we are told not to ape the non-Muslims or take them as our friends as the non-Muslims are sworn enemies of Islam and can never be our friends. For that I was detained under the Internal Security Act and my first lecture happened to be the very thing I said and which got me detained. There are in fact many things which Malays do and which originated from Hinduism. Take the stringing up of coloured lights as one example. Seven days before Hari Raya Malays would string up coloured lights around their home, sometimes even on trees like they do during Christmas. This is a throwback of the old days when they used to use kerosene or oil lamps. And this was a custom borrowed from Deepavali because the Arabs do not do this. So, the next time you pass by a Malay house during Hari Raya and you see all those coloured lights you can smile, knowing that the occupant of that house is borrowing a Hindu ritual -- only that he or she does not know it. If we really want to go into the long list of Hindu customs and rituals that the Malays have borrowed the list would be endless. We should not ape the kafir, the religious scholars tell us. If not we would become a kafir. Well, what about wearing a tie, coat and pants? Is this not a kafir attire? How many Malays go about wearing a robe and turban? Even that UKM lecturer who wants a fatwa issued banning Malays from doing yoga or meditation wears kafir clothes. Look at all the Malay government officers. They all wear kafir clothes and sometimes a tie as well. The security forces all wear kafir uniforms with a kafir hat on their heads. We count our days using a Christian calendar. I am facing various charges for crimes I committed on certain days of the Christian calendar. What was the day of the Islamic calendar, the Hijrah calendar, that I committed my crimes? The charge sheet does not say. I am facing various charges in a kafir court. The charges I am facing are crimes according to kafir laws. I was also under detention without trial according to a kafir law. In fact, according to Islam, I have not committed any crime. And Islam does not allow for detention without trial. For that matter not only have I not committed a crime, according to Islam, but what I have done is what Islam has actually made mandatory. Islam makes it mandatory for all Muslims to perform "Amar Makruf, Nahi Munkar". This means to uphold good and oppose evil. All Muslims must do this without exception. Not doing it, according to Islam, makes you an extremely weak Muslim. I, however, am now facing trial and was under detention without trial for performing my Islamic duty. And kafir laws, not Islamic laws, are being used against me. Kafir laws are being used against Muslims for doing what Islam has made mandatory. And what is the reaction of Muslims to all this? What is the UKM lecturer doing about it? Is he up in arms about the kafir system being implemented against Islam? Is the Member of Parliament for Kulim demonstrating on the streets and screaming, "I am a Muslim first I don't care about other people's opinions"? Okay, the UKM lecturer wants yoga and meditation banned and the Kulim MP wants to shut the mouths of anyone who wants to talk about Islam. But that is about it. It never goes beyond that, Sometimes the Malays can be amazing. Okay, not sometimes, most times. Now UMNO wants Zaid Ibrahim sacked as a Malay. Can any Malay actually be sacked as a Malay? I wonder, but UMNO thinks it can be done. UMNO says that Zaid would be nobody -- he would not be a lawyer of the biggest law firm in Malaysia -- if he was not a Malay and the country did not have Ketuanan Melayu and the New Economic Policy. Zaid thinks that that is an insult. He would like to believe he is what he is because he is Zaid and because he is smart. If he would instead be a simple fisherman in Tumpat, Kelantan, without the benefit of Ketuanan Melayu and the NEP, then this means Zaid is actually quite stupid. I share Zaid's view. I also would like to believe that I am "somebody" and "special" because I am Raja Petra. If it is because of Ketuanan Melayu and the NEP, and if not because of that I would be washing cars in Bangsar, then this would certainly make me very unhappy. Yes, Zaid and people like him do not need crutches. Only losers need crutches. And that is why UMNO wants these crutches to remain, because they are all a bunch of losers. I would like to believe that I am what I am because of who I am and not because of Ketuanan Melayu and the NEP. I take pride in that. I would hate people saying, "of course Raja Petra is successful. He is a Malay and Malays have Ketuanan Melayu and the NEP to help them. Malays need crutches to get ahead." It is time the crutches are removed and the Malays learned how to walk with their heads held up high. Malays have to be made to believe that the Ketuanan Melayu and the NEP is an insult and that it suggests Malays are weak creatures. Malays must be proud of their achievements and not credit their achievements to the protection and special privileges they enjoy because they are Malay. The Malays used to be a proud race. Now they are no longer proud. They accept that they are weak. So they demand protection to compensate for this weakness.

The twists and turns of mala fide

I suppose there must be a good reason why the government would rather keep Malaysians stupid and lock me up so that I can’t continue in my attempts to wake Malaysians up and educate them. Could it be because stupid Malaysians can be easily manipulated while smart Malaysians would vote opposition?

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) was created persuant to the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission Act (1998) as a new regulator for the communications and multimedia industry in Malaysia. At the same time, the Communications and Multimedia Act (1998) was passed, to fulfil the need to regulate an increasingly convergent communications and multimedia industry.

The Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 is based on the basic principles of transparency and clarity; more competition and less regulation; flexibility; bias towards generic rules; regulatory forbearance; emphasis on process rather than content; administrative and sector transparency; and industry self-regulation.

The Act seeks to provide a generic set of regulatory provisions based on generic definitions of market and service activities and services. The jurisdiction of this Act is restricted to networked services and activities only.

The MCMC took over regulation of the Postal Services on 1 November 2002. On the same day it also was appointed the Certifying Agency under the Digital Signature Act (1997).

(http://www.skmm.gov.my/the_law/legislation.asp )

********************************************

The above is what they say on the MCMC website. In the section called WHAT WE DO (http://www.skmm.gov.my/what_we_do/licensing/licensing.asp ), the MCMC website says: The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission issues licences under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, the Postal Services Act 1991 and the Digital Signature Act 1997.

In the section titled ENFORCEMENT (http://www.skmm.gov.my/what_we_do/Enforcement/enforcement.asp ), this is what the MCMC website says:

The primary function of enforcement is to conduct investigation upon receiving reports relating to the commission of offences under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA), the Postal Services Act 1991 (PSA), the Digital Signatures Act 1997 (DSA) and the relevant subsidiary legislations.

The objective of the investigation is to ascertain whether or not the offender has committed the offence and also to gather sufficient evidence on the offender. After the investigation is completed, the investigation paper will be submitted to the Deputy Public Prosecutor for his decision on the appropriate action to be taken on the case investigated by MCMC.

Effective enforcement carried out by MCMC is to ensure the rights of the licensees, investors, consumers and the public are always protected and the confidence in communications, multimedia and postal services are maintained at all times.

***********************************************

Okay, now read the above again and note the following sentences or clauses:

1) The jurisdiction of this Act is restricted to networked services and activities only.
2) …….emphasis on process rather than content……
3) ……. more competition and less regulation…….
4) Effective enforcement carried out by MCMC is to ensure the rights of the licensees, investors, consumers and the public are always protected…….

At 6.00pm on 26 August 2008, Malaysia Today suddenly ‘disappeared’. We thought it was a technical glitch and called the hosting company. The hosting company, who was located overseas, said that the site is working fine and that they have no problems accessing it. We insisted we can’t access it from Malaysia and on further investigation they confirmed what we said and told us that Malaysia Today can’t be accessed only in Malaysia but there are no problems if accessing the site from other countries outside Malaysia.

It was soon established that Malaysia Today could not be accessed because the MCMC had written to the 20 or so Malaysian ISPs (Internet Service Providers; such as Jaring, TMNet, Maxis, Celcom, etc.) and ordered them to block malaysia-today.net. They did not unblock malaysia-today.net until barely a few hours before the police detained me under the Internal Security Act around noon of 12 September 2008.

The reason given to the ISPs was that Malaysia Today had broken the law. Which law was never specified but then Malaysian companies that need the goodwill of the Malaysian government to renew their licences or to ensure that their licences do not get withdrawn do not ask for clarification. They just do what they are told.

Before the MCMC acted on 26 August, they had been summoned for a few meetings to be told that the Cabinet was not happy with the countless revelations and exposes that Malaysia Today had dragged up the last four years since 2004. The MCMC was told the Cabinet is of the view that they (MCMC) are not doing their job and the Cabinet wants them to act against Malaysia Today.

The fact that the MCMC, as charted in its website above, does not have that power (read items 1, 2, 3 and 4 above) to block Malaysia Today appears lost to the powers-that-be. The Cabinet is not concerned about what the law says. They just want Malaysia Today closed down and it is the MCMC’s job to do that. The MCMC replied that it would be difficult to block malaysia-today.net on political grounds as this would look too obvious. It would be better that they use ‘insulting Islam’ and ‘insulting Prophet Muhammad’ as that reason. This would look more ‘legitimate’.

So, on 26 August 2008, the MCMC ordered all the Malaysia ISPs to block malaysia-today.net, which they did. But they still needed a reason to block malaysia-today.net and they found this reason in a comment posted by anti-jihadist. The problem is anti-jihadist posted that comment on 28 August 2008, two days after malaysia-today.net was put out of action. Is the MCMC clairvoyant and could see into the future? Did it have a crystal ball and knew, two days in advance, that anti-jihadist was going to post a ‘damaging’ comment? It is mind-boggling that the MCMC was able to block malaysia-today.net two days before the comment that caused it to be blocked was posted.

Soon after malaysia-today.net went out of action, overseas friends of Malaysia Today floated a new website and tried to restore as much of the old data as possible. Some were saved but much was lost when the servers that hosted malaysia-today.net were closed down and sold off.

This posed another problem. I am facing a charge under the Sedition Act and the Attorney-General did not attach an original copy of the article ‘Let’s send the Altantuya murderers to hell’ with the charge. Instead, they manually typed out the article -- so, for all intents and purposes, the ‘evidence’ of my ‘crime’ had been fabricated. They are now trying to amend the charge but the court has rejected the motion to amend the charge. (The Attorney-General has now appealed this decision in the High Court so we are yet to know if they will be allowed to amend the charge).

Nevertheless, because malaysia-today.net no longer exists, they are not able to adduce the evidence to support the charge and even the amended charge is based on the manually typed copy of the article -- meaning the evidence is still ‘fabricated’. It would be interesting to see how the prosecution now pursues its case against me in the absence of the original article from malaysia-today.net.

Anyway, on 3 December 2008, the prosecution will be embarking on a ‘fishing expedition’ to see if they can find the original copy of that article in my two computers which they have confiscated. They hope, since they can no longer obtain the original copy of the article from malaysia-today.net, that they can instead find it in one of the computers. They are really desperate to find the evidence with which they can use to nail my balls to the wall.

The MCMC realised that they could not justify blocking malaysia-today.net based on a comment by anti-jihadist that was posted two days AFTER the site was blocked. So they decided to unblock malaysia-today.net and instead detain me under Section 73 of the Internal Security Act, barely a few hours later, on vague grounds that I posted articles that incite Malaysians to hate its leaders plus insult Islam and the Prophet.

My wife then filed a writ of habeas corpus and it appeared like the court might agree with my wife’s contention that my detention was vague and mala fide. The court was due to hear our petition on 23 September 2008. On 22 September 2008, they quickly re-detained me under Section 8 of the Internal security Act and on the morning of 23 September they sent me packing off to Kamunting. This torpedoed the habeas corpus hearing due to be held that same day and my wife had to start all over again and file a new habeas corpus action.

A day or two after the MCMC blocked malaysia-today.net, I received a phone call from that big chap who runs the Chawan restaurant in Bangsar, across the road from The Outback in Bangsar Village, who said he wants to discus how malaysia-today-net can be unblocked. My wife and I went to meet him and he told us that the MCMC wants to explore how to unblock malaysia-today.net but this must be based on certain terms and conditions. He told me that he is an emissary from Mohamed Shahril Tarmizi, the senior manager of the MCMC, the man who ordered Malaysia Today closed down.

The problem, they told me, was not my articles, but the comments. Currently, the comments in Malaysia Today are not moderated. Would I be prepared to moderate them? I asked them how to do that when we receive thousands of comments and they are posted 24-7. I would have to employ at least ten staff and that would cost me maybe RM15,000-RM20,000 per month. I do not have the money to do that. I then asked them what solutions they could recommend.

They admitted that they have been pondering over this problem for some time and also do not have any solutions to suggest. Okay, I replied, I am prepared to hand over the job of moderating the comments in Malaysia Today to the government. The government can take over and moderate the comments in Malaysia Today. Would they be prepared to do that?

They admitted that the government would not be able to do that, as it would require a massive operation to do so. Never mind, they told me, they will unblock malaysia-today.net and give us six months to come out with a solution. On 10 September 2008, I received a phone call telling me that the MCMC has decided to unblock malaysia-today.net and that they will give us six months to come out with a plan on how to moderate the comments in Malaysia Today. On 11 September 2008, malaysia-today.net was unblocked. On 12 September 2008, they detained me under the Internal Security Act.

Can any of you figure out what is going on here? I, for one, can’t imagine what game they are playing.

While under ISA detention, I related this whole episode to SAC1 Dato’ Zamri, the man in-charge of the six-member team of interrogators assigned to me. I am not sure of his ‘surname’ but he is probably the best-looking Special Branch officer in Bukit Aman and most likely will be the head of the Special Branch in time to come.

He was very accommodating (even bought me a packet of cigarettes; which is not allowed when you are in jail) but what concerned me was his insistence that my articles could mislead the readers because the majority of Malaysians have a much lower intellectual level and may not understand what I write. It is not that I have committed a crime as such. It is just that the way I write may confuse Malaysians. In short, my crime is for having a higher intellectual level than the average Malaysian and they might misunderstand what I write. This is why the government regards me as a threat to society.

I do not regard myself as an intellectual or even as being smarter than most Malaysians. But this was the argument THEY were using to justify my detention and this bothered me. Based on what they were tying to tell me, I have to be sent to Kamunting because I am smart and most Malaysians are stupid. So Malaysians need to be protected from me.

I asked Dato’ Zamri: would it not be better that I be allowed to go free and continue to educate Malaysians through Malaysia Today so that, in time, they too can be ‘smart like me’ (tongue-in-cheek of course because I did not buy the “Raja Petra is too smart and Malaysians too stupid” argument)? No, they did not think so. They felt that the best solution would be to lock me up so that the ‘stupid’ Malaysians can be ‘protected’.

I suppose there must be a good reason why the government would rather keep Malaysians stupid and why they lock me up so that I can’t continue my attempts to wake Malaysians up and educate them. Could it be because stupid Malaysians can be easily manipulated while smart Malaysians would vote opposition? Maybe Dato’ Zamri can help reply to this question.

In the meantime, the government has appealed the court’s decision to release me from ISA detention on 7 November 2008. They want me back in Kamunting where they feel I belong and which they feel would be safer for Malaysians. Let’s see what the court has to say about this. Will the court agree that Malaysians should be ‘protected’ and that I should not be allowed to awaken and educate them, or will the court feel that it is time Malaysians received the right information and not the crap that the school history textbooks and mainstream media spews forth?

Anwar dismisses cynics

SHAH ALAM (Nov 30, 2008): Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today dismissed talks by cynics that his talk of taking over the government was just rhetoric, saying: "Insyallah, not long, we will be in Putrajaya."

Speaking of the exploitation of the indigenous people of Sabah and Sarawak, especially the ancestral land exploitation issues, he said: "We are giving their leader the option - are they going to continue supporting a system that insults the intelligence of their own people?"

"In the name of God, I trust the wisdom of my people, all Malaysians."

He said all this will be achieved by the power of prayers. "Don’t underestimate the power of prayers because we can plan, we can work but the power of the prayers of people of all faiths should not be underestimated."

"We all believe in what is right and we leave it to God, and in a short time, hopefully, we will achieved what we want," Anwar said.

Anwar had told a public rally on Saturday that Sarawak will be their next battleground before the Pakatan Rakyat takes over the federal government

He asked the party's leaders to make weekly trips to Sarawak to meet its aim to unseat the Barisan Nasional (BN) government in the state.

He stated this when explaining to those present why the PR could not meet its deadline of Sept 16 to unseat the federal government.

He further said it (taking over of federal government) did not materialise because a letter to negotiate the matter sent to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was not entertained by him. Another reason, he said, was that BN MPs wanting to defect had laid a condition that their names not be revealed until they were ready to do so.

His call to take Sarawak however has got his cynics pooh-poohing his claims, Bernama reported.

In Kuching, Sarawak Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Taib questioned Anwar's credibility, especially when his Sept 16 deadline to form a new overnment did not materialise.

"I don't want to comment on people like that. Well, his (Anwar's) credibilty is not that high when he said Sept 16 is his target date which he promised to be the date to form a new government," Taib, who is also state BN chairman.

In Kota Kinabalu, Information Minister Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek regarded PKR's aim to capture Sarawak next year as yet another delution of Mat Jenin, a dreamer in a popular Malay fable. He said after PKR failed to form the federal government on Sept 16 as promised, many people had lost their faith in the party.

"I find the stories of the 'delutions of Mat Jenin' to be interesting human dramas. I see the 'Mat Jenins' from the peninsula who failed to realise their big dream of forming the government on Sept 16, now trying again to win over the people.

"What is clear after Sept 16 is that, whatever new promises they make would only be laughed at," he told reporters when met at the home of Sabah Umno information chief Datuk Sapawi Ahmad in Kampung Ketiau, near here, today.

Don't use me as scapegoat says Jalil

BUKIT MERTAJAM, Dec 1 - Permatang Pauh Umno chief Datuk Abdul Jalil Abdul Majid has urged Seberang Jaya state assemblyman Datuk Arif Shah Omar Shah not to use him and the division as a scapegoat or reason for joining the opposition.

"He can leave if he wants to but don't put the blame on us," he said when commenting a statement by Arif Shah that he had been sidelined by the division, despite being the only Umno and Barisan Nasional (BN) candidate to win in Permatang Pauh during the March general election.

Jalil who recently defeated Arif Shah in the contest for the Permatang Pauh chief post said he had no quarrels with Arif Shah.
He said the new committee was taking steps to strengthen the party by weeding out members who supported the opposition during the general election and the Permatang Pauh by-election in Aug.

Arif Shah was quoted by newspapers as saying that he was disappointed with Jalil and the Permatang Pauh division for ignoring him and that he had been invited by Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) to join the party.
"There is no problem. The division is working as a team for the future of the party and Permatang Pauh. We are one happy family," said Jalil.

Permatang Pauh Umno information chief Ahmad Sahar Shuib said Arif Shah should respect the delegates decision to retain Jalil as division chief.

"We did not sideline him. He has to fit in with the new line-up," he said. - Bernama

High crime rates? Nah, just change your perception…

First, when the price of petrol was hiked, they told us to “change our life-styles”.

Now, when the crime rate appears to be high, they are telling us to “change our perception” of crime…

… and all will be well.

Najib was saying that our perception of worrying crime rates should be viewed in perspective: apparently Malaysia has lower crime rates than Japan and Hong Kong.

Maybe it was just my perception that my apartment was broken into last year and my personal belongings stolen.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Curse Of Taj Mahal Hotel's Sixth Floor

By P. Vijian

MUMBAI, Nov 30 (Bernama) -- It was a painful death for Malaysian Hema Kassipillai, whose decomposed body was found on the sixth floor of the 565-room Taj Mahal Palace Hotel -- a gracious landmark of the city built in 1903.

The sixth floor bore the brunt of the violent terrorist attacks that burned down the entire floor in the 60-hour horrendous ordeal that started on Wednesday in India's financial capital.

Like all other rooms, Hema's room, number 637, was completely charred during the ensuing battle between unknown number of terrorists holed-up inside the hotel and dozens of Indian security forces.

Terrorists, allegedly arrived via sea route with their armaments, made two of the hotel's sixth floor rooms, facing the Colaba seafront, as their headquarters and later terrorised the occupants until Saturday morning.

The Times of India gave a descriptive write-up of the ill-fated hotel build by the industrialised Jamsetji N. Tata.

The occupants on the sixth floor also include the paper's Consulting Editor Sabina Sehgal Saikial, who was also killed in the attacks.

The hotel's general manager Karambir Kang's wife and his two sons also perished in the fire that gutted the sixth floor.

Another luckless guest on the sixth floor was Greek tycoon Andreas Liveras, who was slain by terrorist bullets.

But former Indian city model Gurpreet Gill, who currently lives in Singapore, escaped and was reported to have stumbled upon two suspected terrorists, whose room was next to hers.

The terrorists, equipped with blackberrys to monitor news and satellite phones, destroyed all the rooms facing the Arabian sea, including the presidential rooms, valuable paintings, furniture and hand-oven silk carpets, said the paper.

According to Indian Home Ministry, a total of 183 people were killed, including 22 foreigners.

The hotel is an architecture marvel which combines Florentine, Moorish and Oriental designs, making it a magnificent landmark of Mumbai.

But now it stands with a badly-wounded image.

-- BERNAMA

pic: vikatan.com

**********

Hema's Remains To Arrive Monday

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 30 (Bernama) -- The remains of Hema Kasipillay, 51, who died in the Hotel Taj Mahal Palace in the Mumbai terrorist attack, are scheduled to arrive at the KL International Airport (KLIA) in Sepang at around 6am Monday.

According to a spokesman at the Malaysian consulate in Mumbai, her remains will be flown back on a Malaysian Airlines cargo flight (MH095) that will depart Mumbai at 11.30pm (Indian time).

Hema who lived in Bangsar and worked for a Kuala Lumpur-based company, was staying at the hotel while on a business visit to India' commercial capital.

The landmark hotel came under siege by terrorists on Wednesday, a day after the unfortunate lady arrived in Mumbai.

She was scheduled to return to Malaysia on Dec 5.

Her charred remains were found by a medical team in her room on the sixth of the hotel and she is believed to have died of smoke inhalation.

-- BERNAMA
********

MIC Says Hema's Death Tragic

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 30 (Bernama) -- MIC today condemned the terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, which killed nearly 200 people including a Malaysian woman, Hema Kassipillay.

Its president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu, who expressed shock and disbelief over Hema's death, extended his condolences to Hema's husband K. Sivakumaran and expressed the hope that the Malaysian government could assist Sivakumaran to bring her remains back to Malaysia.

"We feel sad and enraged over the death of Hema and almost 200 other people in this barbaric and unthinkable act of terror," he told Bernama here, Sunday.

Samy Vellu said the Malaysian High Commission in India should immediately seek the release of her body since it was reported that a post-mortem had already been conducted.

Hema, 51, who was reported missing since the terror attacks in Mumbai, the financial city of India last Wednesday, was found dead yesterday in her room at the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel where she stayed.

Hema, from Bangsar, Kuala Lumpur, was believed to have died of smoke inhalation.

A post mortem conducted at the Sir Jamshedji Jeejibhai Hospital found no gunshot injuries on the body.

Samy Vellu said he was confident that the Indian government would bring the perpetrators to justice.

Meanwhile MIC secretary-general Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam, who is Human Resources Minister, said, "Our prayers are with Hema and the others who died in the tragedy."

-- BERNAMA
*******

MCA slams Mukhriz's suggestion to abolish vernacular schools

Tee Keat slams Mukhriz for suggesting that vernacular schools should go

By Shannon Teoh

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 1 - MCA president Datuk Ong Tee Keat has wasted no time in condemning Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir's suggestion to abolish vernacular schools.

"Mukhriz is just one of the many who are now repeating the same polemics that are a few decades old, simply because of the advent of their party's poll," the Transport Minister said.

"It is saddening because politicians cannot think out of the box," he wrote in a blog posting.

In a press conference in Parliament today, the candidate for Umno Youth chief in the March party elections said that all schools should teach subjects in Bahasa Malaysia except for language subjects.

He said the proposal to have one unified school system could help address the problem of non-Malays misunderstanding the concept of "Ketuanan Melayu," or Malay Supremacy, which has become a source of tension between Malays and non-Malays.

Mukhriz argued that such misunderstandings were a result of a lack of national unity, which he blamed on the existence of vernacular shools.

Also in Parliament, MCA vice president Datuk Liow Tiong Lai said there was no reason to change the education system as the current one was accepted by all.

"The present system is still the best to ensure unity and harmony in our multiracial country," the Health Minister said.

He added that it was an old fallacy that vernacular primary schools caused unity problems.

He reasoned that at secondary level, the students were still able to integrate.

"He might not understand that teaching in your mother tongue is more effective at the primary level," Liow added.

KAYVEAS GIVES BARISAN NASIONAL ULTIMATUM - AMEND ISA OR PPP WILL QUIT

People's Progressive Party (PPP) President Datuk M. Kayveas today issued an ultimatum that if the Barisan Nasional leadership fails to amend the Internal Security Act (ISA), his party, the People's Progressive Party (PPP) which is considered a mosquito party within BN, will quit the BN coalition.

Datuk Kayveas claimed that his youth and ladies wings have expressed that the main failure of the BN at the 8 March general election defeat was the abuse of use of ISA on innocent Malaysians, while it should only be used for terrorist purposes.

Will the BN leadership consider this ultimatum from Datuk Kayveas?

Looking at the factors, Datuk Kayveas who has been shadowed after his known disastrous defeat at Taiping by the press and since a majority of PPP members seem to be unhappy with his leadership, may just ignore his plea and may be please with the departure of PPP since they are unable to contribute effective to the BN coalition.

Najib says no return to Mahathirism

Najib says no return to Mahathirism

By Leslie Lau
Consultant Editor

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 1 – Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said tonight there would be no return to Mahathirism under his administration when he takes the reins of power next March.

Speaking to Riz Khan on the Al Jazeera satellite news channel, Najib said he realised that the Barisan Nasional (BN) government had little choice but to respond to a new Malaysia which had emerged after the last general elections.

“I realise there is a new Malaysia which has changed and evolved. Malaysian society is now more mature and demands more openness,” he said.

Najib's remarks appeared to be an attempt to distance himself from the policies of former PM Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, even as Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders accuse him of being an acolyte of Malaysia's former leader.

The DPM's critics have in recent weeks labelled his impending administration as one which would bring back Mahathirism, and result in a more oppressive environment with tighter controls and more corruption.

However, Najib said tonight that he was committed to the reform agenda of the current prime minister, especially in the judiciary and to fight graft.

“Of course I am committed to reforms. The prime minister wants to strengthen the judiciary and fight corruption. That will send a clear message to the elctorate that we are listening,” he said.

Najib said the BN government had to draw lessons from the last general elections, pointing out that the ruling coalition would have to reform “or the public will change us.”

The DPM was also asked to address a number of questions via telephone and email during the live 20 minute interview where he was asked about issues such as the ongoing debate over Ketuanan Melayu, or Malay Supremacy.

He said that Umno would have to cater to the needs of its base Malay support. However, he said BN and Umno must also address the needs and grievances of the non-Malay communities.

“I believe in the concept of multi-racial government and if there are genuine grievances we must cater to them,” he said.

Najib repeated his commitment towards the gradual liberalisation of the affirmative action programmes under the New Economic Policy (NEP), pointing out that it could only be done once the Bumiputera community was more confident and secure.

Addressing the issue of the Internal Security Act (ISA), he said the only reason there has been no serious act of terrorism in Malaysia was because of the existence of the law which provides for detention without trial.

He said the government realised recent concerns about how the ISA had been applied, and acknowledged the growing calls for its repeal or amendment.

Asked what he thought of the threat by Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim's intention to topple the BN government, he said the ruling coalition took seriously the last general election results.

“If we do not change or reform then it is quite possible the electorate will decide to end BN rule,” he said.

Anwar stays mum over Sept 16

Part 2

ABDUL RAZAK BAGINDA A 'FREE-MAN' DUE TO NO APPEAL

It has been reported that the Attorney-General's Chambers are not appealing against the Shah Alam High Court decision to acquit political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda, who had been charged with abetting in the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.

The Prosecution has 14 days from the ruling date of October 31, 2008 to file an appeal but investigations made at the Court Registry up to 5 pm today indicate no appeal has been filed. However, Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Majid Tun Hamzah was stated as saying today that the court had made a finding of fact and he confirmed that the prosecution would not file an appeal.

This case has received enormous coverage since Deputy Prime Minister or Prime Minister-in-waiting Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor have been somewhat implicated to be involved and the only person to bring to light about their involvement would only be possible through Abdul Razak Baginda, although two Statutory Declarations from Raja Petra Kamaruddin and Private Investigator Bala Subramaniam have mentioned the possible connection in the murder.

The Judge in his written ruling had acquitted Abdul Razak Baginda on the grounds that “Once the essential elements of abetment - by instigation, by conspiracy and by aiding - [...] are not proven on the basis of prima facie evidence, any other inferences and doubts that may have arisen must be resolved, as is trite, in favour of the accused person.

“It is not for the court to call for the defence merely to clear or clarify such doubts [...] I find there is no prima facie case for him (Abdul Razak, left) to answer his charge...”

However, the Judge ordered Special Action Squad police officers Azilah Hadri, 32, and Sirul Azhar Umar, 38, to enter their defence.

It is in the minds of Malaysians that this is a politically motivated decision and the surprise that the Prosecution had fail to file their appeal has 'spoken for itself'.

news n photo courtesy of Malaysiakini

Sidang Media Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim

PERALIHAN KUASA

1. Akhirnya Majlis Tertinggi UMNO dan UMNO keseluruhannya terpaksa akur akan kehendak Dato Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi sebagai Presiden supaya peralihan kuasa diadakan pada Mac 2009.

2. Tiga bulan bukanlah satu jangka masa yang panjang tetapi dalam politik UMNO dan negara sekarang banyaklah kerja-kerja pemulihan parti yang akan terganggu kerana penangguhan yang tidak berasas ini.

3. Sebabnya ialah kerosakan yang dilakukan oleh Abdullah kepada UMNO begitu teruk sehingga tiap saat usaha pemulihan dilewatkan mungkin boleh membawa kesan yang buruk kepada UMNO dan Barisan Nasional. Selagi Abdullah berada sebagai Presiden Parti dan Perdana Menteri maka Dato Seri Najib akan terganggu dalam usaha memulih semula segala-gala yang perlu dipulih sebelum Pilihanraya Umum ke 13.

4. Sesungguhnya UMNO, Barisan Nasional dan parti-parti komponen Barisan Nasional sudah rosak teruk dalam masa lima tahun Abdullah memimpin pertubuhan-pertubuhan ini. Mungkin ada mereka-mereka yang akan pertahan prestasi Abdullah dengan berkata kerosakan ini sudah lama berlaku dan Abdullah cuma mewarisi kerosakan ini.

5. Benarkah? Jika benar kenapakah UMNO dan Barisan Nasional diberi kemenangan 2/3 tiap Pilihanraya sejak 1974 lagi. Tidak sekali pun Barisan Nasional menang kurang dari 2/3 dalam Dewan Rakyat. Dan Barisan Nasional tidak pernah gagal menguasai Kerajaan di Kedah, Perak dan Selangor. Pulau Pinang juga, sejak Gerakan menyertai Barisan Nasional tidak pernah kalah kepada parti lawan, terutama DAP.

6. Dalam Pilihanraya 1999, di waktu mana ramai pengundi Melayu kurang senang dengan kepimpinan UMNO; Barisan Nasional masih menang 2/3 dalam Dewan Rakyat.

7. Jika parti UMNO dan Barisan Nasional yang diserah kepada pimpinan Abdullah pada Oktober 2003 sudah rosak apakah mungkin Barisan Nasional mencapai kemenangan luar biasa pada 2004 dengan mendapat 90% dari kerusi Dewan Rakyat, mendapat balik kuasa di Terengganu dan hanya kalah sedikit sahaja di Kelantan, kubu PAS. Semua tanda-tanda menunjuk bahawa UMNO dan Barisan Nasional yang diterima oleh Abdullah pada Oktober 2003 berada dalam keadaan amat sihat dan kuat. Jika tidak mungkinkah BN capai kemenangan luar biasa pada Pilihanraya ke-11 pada tahun 2004, hanya 5 bulan selepas peralihan kuasa.

8. Jika kemenangan ini hanya kerana kepimpinan baik oleh Abdullah, tentulah kemenangan yang lebih baik akan diperolehi setelah Kerajaan dan Parti dipimpin olehnya selama empat tahun selepas Pilihanraya umum ke-11. Tetapi prestasi parti dalam Pilihanyara ke-12 tahun 2008 adalah begitu buruk sekali.

9. Jika ini tidak mencukupi untuk membuktikan kerosakan Barisan Nasional dan UMNO di bawah pimpinan Abdullah sejak 2004, pilihanraya kecil di Permatang Pauh jelas membukti bahawa Barisan Nasional dan UMNO sudah jadi parti kerdil yang begitu takut kepada parti lawan sehingga ahli-ahli tidak berani pakai lencana dan baju UMNO atau BN.

10. Apa yang berlaku dalam Pilihanraya Umum 2008 ialah ramai ahli dan penyokong biasa UMNO dan Barisan Nasional telah undi parti lawan. Apakah ini di sebabkan mereka tertarik dengan perjuangan parti PAS, DAP dan Keadilan. Soal selidik menunjuk bahawa mereka tidak terpikat dengan Negara Islam PAS atau Malaysian Malaysia DAP atau reformasi Keadilan. Mereka dengan hati yang berat telah undi parti-parti lawan kerana kecewa dengan kepimpinan Abdullah, tindak-tanduk dan sikap Jemaah Menteri yang tidak tahu kenang budi barang sedikitpun.

11. Untuk memperbaiki kerosakan ini masa yang panjang dan usaha yang gigih perlu dibuat oleh pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO yang kurang tercemar imej mereka. Mereka perlu turun padang untuk berjumpa dengan seberapa ramai ahli UMNO dan pengundi-pengundi supaya dapat mendengar rintihan mereka. Banyaklah kesalahan-kesalahan Kerajaan pimpinan Abdullah yang perlu dibetulkan. Kemerosotan ekonomi, kehilangan peluang-peluang kerja, kenaikan harga barang, tidak adanya lagi kontrak bagi kontraktor kecil, semua ini perlu diberi perhatian oleh Dato Seri Najib dan pasukannya. Tindakan yang berkesan perlu diambil bagi mengatasi masalah-masalah ini.

12. Di masa yang sama penyalahgunaan kuasa untuk memperkayakan ahli keluarga perlu dihentikan. Cara hidup yang mewah yang diamali oleh pemimpin-pemimpin parti dan Kerajaan perlu dihentikan.

13. Kontrak-kontrak perlu diagih dengan adil kepada semua pihak dan tidak hanya kepada orang tertentu diantara pemimpin politik sebagai sogokan untuk mendapat sokongan.

14. Kerosakan besar yang kedua yang berlaku dan berkembang semasa kepimpinan Dato Abdullah ialah rasuah dikalangan pemimpin dan ahli UMNO di semua peringkat. Ini menjadi-jadi kerana Dato Abdullah sendiri dilihat sebagai Perdana Menteri yang mengguna kedudukan dan kuasanya untuk menjayakan perniagaan anak dan menantunya, serta lain-lain kaum kerabatnya.

15. Kemunculan Scomi, ECM Libra, dan kontrak-kontrak yang diperolehi oleh syarikat-syarikat ini yang di ketahui dimiliki oleh anak dan menantu PM seolah-oleh mengizin dan menggalak amalan rasuah.

16. Dalam bidang politik, secara langsung atau tidak langsung Abdullah terlibat dengan beberapa kes sogokan. Semua tahu bahawa wang sebanyak RM 200/- diberi kepada wakil-wakil ke mesyuarat Bahagian Kubang Pasu supaya tidak mengundi saya untuk menjadi wakil ke Mesyuarat Agong UMNO pada tahun 2006. Seorang Ketua UMNO Bahagian Petaling Jaya Selatan telah lapur kepada Ibu Pejabat UMNO yang Dato Abdullah telah beri sebanyak RM 200/-, kain pelekat dan sejadah kepada ahli cawangan-cawangan UMNO yang dibawa di Kuala Lumpur, diberi makan dan penginapan di hotel mewah dan disuruh sokong peralihan kuasa olehnya pada 2010. Seorang pemimpin veteran UMNO telah buat laporan polis dan Badan Pencegah Rasuah berkenaan perkara yang sama.

17. Kata pepatah Melayu "Apabila guru kencing berdiri, murid akan kencing berlari." Dan sebenarnyalah apabila pemimpin dilihat mengamalkan rasuah maka pengikut akan amalkannya lebih-lebih lagi.

18. Untuk mendapat sokongan pemimpin tertentu diperingkat bahagian kontrak bermillion diberi kepada mereka, walaupun mereka tidak punyai kebolehan untuk melaksanakan kontrak tersebut.

19. Semasa pencalonan bagi jawatan-jawatan tertentu, ramai yang ingin dicalonkan mengguna wang untuk mendapat pencalonan.

20. Setelah diketahui bahawa ada calon yang sanggup menghulur wang sogokan supaya mereka dicalonkan maka ahli-ahli dan perwakilan ke mesyuarat bahagian sudah mula meminta wang sogokan jika sokongan mereka dihendaki.

21. Amatlah jelas bahawa rasuah sudah menjadi budaya ahli-ahli UMNO disemua peringkat. Apabila budaya ini dianggap sebagai sesuatu perkara biasa maka pemimpin yang akan dipilih lebih mungkin terdiri daripada mereka yang tidak bermoral, perasuah yang hanya ingin jadi pemimpin untuk kepentingan diri. Apabila ini berlaku maka negara akan perolehi pemimpin dan Kerajaan yang tidak bermoral, yang akan salahguna kuasa untuk kepentingan diri. Dengan ini akan rosaklah negara.

22. Rasuah dikalangan ahli dan pemimpin UMNO akan menjadikan UMNO parti yang tidak dapat dipercayai oleh rakyat, dipandang hina dan akhirnya ditolak.

23. Jika UMNO pimpinan Dato Najib ingin diterima dan disokong oleh rakyat sebagai pengundi, ingin memperolehi kemenangan dalam Pilihanraya Umum ke 13 maka rasuah dalam parti hendaklah dihapuskan. Usaha ini bukanlah mudah tetapi suka atau tidak suka Najib dan pasukannya perlu berusaha sedaya upaya.

24. Jika tidak pengundi akan undi siapa sahaja yang menyogok wang kepada mereka dan ini termasuk parti lawan. UMNO dan BN mungkin tidak akan dapat memerintah negara ini lagi. Kita sekarang sedang diberi "preview" jenis pemerintahan yang akan didirikan oleh parti-parti lawan.

Dr M: Pak Lah to blame for corruption and cronyism in Umno

(TheMalaysianinsider)

By Shannon Teoh

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 14 - Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed today blamed Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi for the corruption which he says is rife in Umno.

He said the new Umno leadership would have to work hard to repair what he described as the damages inflicted on the country by Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's administration.

Dr Mahathir, who has been increasingly vocal in recent weeks, repeated his contention that Barisan Nasional's (BN) current weak position is largely the fault of Abdullah.

Writing in his popular chedet.com blog today, he defended his own administration and leadership, pointing out that even when Umno was extremely unpopular in 1999, BN managed to retain its two-thirds majority in Parliament.

"Umno leaders must now meet as many Umno members and voters as possible to hear their

complaints," he said, naming the economic downturn, inflation, lack of employment and contracts for small contractors as matters that Datuk Seri Najib Razak, as Abdullah's successor, must pay attention to.

He said that cronyism and corruption became rife under Abdullah.

"This was so because even Abdullah was seen to abuse his position and power to help his son and son-in-law's businesses," he stated, referring to such companies as Scomi, in which his son Kamaluddin Abdullah is involved in and ECM Libra, which his son-in-law Khairy Jamaluddin is linked to.

"Everyone knows about the RM200 given to delegates to the Kubang Pasu division so that they did not vote me to be a delegate at the 2006 Umno General Assembly," Mahathir said.

He added also that a Petaling Jaya Selatan leader as well as a veteran leader had reported that Abdullah had given RM 200 and other gifts to branch members and treated them to a stay in a luxury hotel in exchange for support of his 2010 transition plan.

"It is clear that corruption has become part of Umno culture at all levels. This will cause Umno to lose the confidence of the people.

"If Umno under Najib wants the support of voters, it must stamp out corruption. If not, voters will vote whoever pays them off and this includes the opposition," he warned.

Mahathir, who was Prime Minister for 22 years, rebutted any assertion that Abdullah had inherited a damaged Barisan Nasional.

"If so, then why did BN gain two-thirds majority since 1974? BN has never failed to rule Kedah, Perak and Selangor and since Gerakan joined BN, it has never lost Penang," he reasoned.

He further stated that Abdullah had succeeded him in Oct 2003 and in five months, won big at the 11th General Elections with 90 per cent of MPs from the ruling coalition and took back Terengganu as well as nearly regaining Kelantan from Pas.

"This shows that the BN he inherited was very healthy," Mahathir concluded and added that the Permatang Pauh by-election was further proof as "members were afraid to wear the badge and shirts of Umno or BN."

Fatwa, Control, Choices and Women Part 2

Minister will attend Pakatan Rakyat judiciary caucus

TheMalaysianinsider
By Debra Chong

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 13 — The parliamentary caucus on the integrity and independence of the judiciary mooted by opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, which will hold its first meeting at lunch time today, received support from an unexpected source — Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.

Aziz, the minister in charge of parliamentary affairs as well as the de facto Law Minister replacing Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, told reporters in Parliament this morning that he would be attending the caucus meeting.

"Yes, I'll be attending today. I support the caucus for integrity. Integrity, it is very important," he said, paving the way for what is hoped will finally culminate in a full-fledged bipartisanship in Parliament.

Opposition MPs had attempted to form a bipartisan parliamentary caucus against the Internal Security Act in September when one of their own, Seputeh MP Teresa Kok, was arrested and detained a week under the law.

However, the only Barisan Nasional member they managed to pull into the caucus then was Zaid, who was a senator then.

Nazri today urged his fellow MPs from both the BN government and the Pakatan Rakyat coalition to show their support for the caucus on integrity.

"Everybody should aspire to be of the highest integrity, regardless of BN or opposition," he added.

Nazri admits mistake about former judges

(Themalaysianinsider)

Nazri now says the judges were indeed sacked. —Bernama pic

UPDATED

By Debra Chong

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 13 — Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Nazri Aziz admitted today he had made a mistake in saying last week that five former Supreme Court judges, the main characters in the 1988 judicial crisis, were not sacked.

He told reporters in Parliament today they were indeed sacked.

The minister also disclosed that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had written to the Chief Secretary asking the government to pay their pensions on grounds of compassion.

His admission today comes after both his predecessor Datuk Zaid Ibrahim and former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad disputed his retelling of the 1988 judicial crisis.

"They were sacked, it is true," he said.

Nazri said he had made the statement based on the assumption that people who had been sacked were not entitled to receive any pension, which the five judges had.

He explained that he had ordered the Cabinet secretariat to continue investigations into the matter even after making the statement in the House.

This week, he found out that the King in 1988 had written a letter of appeal to the Chief Secretary to the Government asking that the judges who had been sacked be given their pensions on grounds of compassion.

"I regret if my statement in Parliament maybe had caused some difficulty to someone, but it was not deliberate," he said, stopping short of apologising.

He was quick to point out that he had made the error because the information had not been "publicised". This prompted him to highlight the need for full disclosure of the facts including, in this case, the amount of ex-gratia payment received by the judges.

"Whatever that we do, we should inform the public, including the ex-gratia payment, because the money belongs to the rakyat," said Nazri.

"We should not make agreements with the judges. There is no question of not revealing," he added.

He pointed out that doing so was an example of double standards. However, he refused to be drawn into an argument of whether the government had been wrong in dismissing the judges from their positions.

"Whether the sacking is right or wrong, that is not my problem," he said.

Salleh Abbas Affair: Clues from a second look at the judges’ saga

New Straits Times

A LOT has been said on the matter involving former lord president Tun Salleh Abas and other judges following the ex-gratia payment of RM10.5 million, including RM5 million to Salleh.

I am not disputing whatever sum that he got but the government, and especially former law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, should not try to make out as if Salleh had been victimised. For if the statements by Zaid and others are to be believed, the payment is a restitution for what they (especially Salleh) went through 20 years ago, the inference being that he had been unfairly treated and had not been given the due process he was entitled to.

Thus, the suggestion by Noramtaz Abdullah (“It’s time to set the record straight”— N S T, Nov 11) that the government should reveal all is in order.

To put things in perspective, I would like to cite the chronology of events leading to the “sacking” as mentioned in the booklet The Unrebutted Charges Against Tun Salleh Abas, an extract from the book Judicial Misconduct by Peter Alderidge Williams QC.

It gives a different picture of the events leading to the convening of the tribunal. This is the chronology of events according to Williams.

What sparked the incident was a letter from Salleh to the then king on March 26, 1988.

On May 27, 1988, in the presence of the deputy prime minister and the chief secretary to the government, the prime minister informed Salleh that the king wished him to step down, that is, retire as the lord president, because of the letters he had sent to the rulers.

May 28, 1988: Salleh signed the letter of resignation.

May 29: Salleh withdrew his resignation by letter and held a press conference.

June 2: Through the newspapers, Salleh made a request for a public hearing of a tribu n a l .

June 3: Through the newspapers, Salleh requested that the tribunal consist of “per - sons of high judicial standing”.

June 9: The prime minister made a second representation to the king alleging further misconduct by Salleh based upon Salleh’s undignified use of the press.

June 11: Members of the tribunal were appointed pursuant to the Constitution by the king.

June 14: Salleh was served with a list of the charges against him.

June 17: Salleh was served with a set of rules setting out the procedure the tribunal would follow.

June 21: Anthony Lester’s application to be admitted to the court for the purpose of defending Salleh was granted with the attorney-general offering no objection.

June 27: Salleh’s solicitors were informed that the tribunal hearing would proceed on June 29 and that Salleh had permission to be represented by his solicitors and Lester.

June 29: The tribunal convened but counsel for Salleh informed the tribunal that Salleh would not participate in the proceedings. Counsel for Salleh applied unsuccessfully for a week’s adjournment.

July 7: The tribunal completed its report for the king but did not submit it.

Williams said it was clear from the summary that a some fancy footwork was going on behind the scenes and the least important matter that seemed to be commanding Salleh’s attention was the actual confrontation and squaring up with the charges preferred against him.

Thus, a reading of the book gives an insight into the incident and gives the impression that Salleh was not as innocent as some people h ave made him out to be, that is, being victimised.

Dr M: Money politics will ruin Umno in GE

Govt eases 30% bumiputera quota for firms seeking listing

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 12 – The government today relaxed the 30 per cent bumiputera equity ownership for companies seeking to be listed but have yet to fulfil the quota requirement.

Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said the relaxation, which would take effect immediately, was to ensure that the Malaysian capital investment market stays progressive and competitive.

He said that the companies concerned had to take specific steps and under the reorganisation, needed to heed the conditions of the National Development Policy (NDP) while continuing to offer the shares to institutions and bumiputera investors approved by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry.

He said, however, that the shares that were not subscribed could be offered to other bumiputeras as part of the share voting process.

“I wish to stress that the 30 per cent Bumiputera equity participation at the point of listing will continue to be enforced. However, there will be a slight change in terms of the methodology,” he told reporters after visiting the Securities Commission (SC) here today.

“This means that more individual bumiputeras could apply for the shares concerned. If the shares offered to individual bumiputeras are still not fully subscribed, then the company concerned is deemed to have fulfilled the 30 per cent bumiputera equity,” he said.

Asked whether this move would jeopardise the effort to attain 30 per cent bumiputera equity overall, he said the action would allow other bumiputera individuals to participate and take up the public balloting.

“There are two tiers. After the two cuts, if the shares are still not taken up, it is only fair to allow the companies to be listed. Otherwise, there will be a huge uncertainty for them,” he said.

The SC chairman Datuk Seri Zarinah Anwar said to date, seven companies had yet to fulfil the share ownership conditions.

She said these companies’ representative had met the SC and had been given time to fulfil the condition.

“The share prices of these companies today have gone below their IPO pricing. Of course, it does not make sense then to compel bumiputeras to subscribe as they will be able to buy the shares cheaper from the market,” she said. – Bernama

Dr M says ISA should be used against corrupt Umno members

By Adib Zalkapli

PUTRAJAYA, Nov 12 - Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad today suggested the Internal Security Act (ISA) should be used against corrupt Umno members.

He also backed Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin as the best candidate in the race for the Umno deputy presidency while suggesting that the other two challengers are involved in money politics.

"That's a good way to use ISA, not for some writer who writes nonsense," he said of corrupt Umno members and also in an apparent reference to Malaysia Today editor Raja Petra Kamarudin, who was released recently from ISA detention.

Dr Mahathir, who has become increasingly vocal in recent weeks, said there is "a strong possibility that Umno deputy presidential candidates are involved in money politics."

"Because some people who were at the bottom during the first week, suddenly shot up," said Mahathir when asked to comment whether the contest for the Umno deputy presidency is tainted with money politics.

The contest for the party's deputy presidency is now a three way tussle between Muhyiddin, who garnered 92 nominations, Datuk Seri Ali Rustam and Tan Sri Muhammad Muhd Taib.

Ali and Muhammad received the minimum nominations, 39 on the last weekend of the Umno divisional meetings. Ali now has 48 nominations while Muhammad, 45.

"Everybody knows that Umno leaders are using money, when the election comes, the people will reject them. Not everyone is but the majority is. So you can be an Umno leader, but the people will reject you. When we have lost, there is no point in becoming Umno president," said Mahathir.

"Who wants to elect somebody who bought his way up," he added

"When you know somebody who has got very bad history and still getting support. That history I think has relevance to the support," he said when asked about the three cornered fight for the deputy presidency.

However he said among all the three candidates, Muhyiddin is the most qualified.

He recommended that all party leaders be investigated and removed from the party if found guilty.

"We need to clean up the party. Now you see the opposition is very quiet and Umno is seen as a very corrupt party, so opposition will talk about how they are not corrupt," said Mahathir.

He said that Umno leaders who are involved in money politics should be thrown into prison.

Ronnie Liu arrested

(Anilnetto) Selangor state exco member Ronnie Liu has been detained or arrested, according to two sources.

He is believed to have been arrested in Shah Alam for obstructing MPSJ officials from carrying out their duties during an anti-vice raid on a hotel in Puchong last year.

A 2007 case?

Ronnie of course played a prominent role on Sunday, 9 November during the candlelight vigil and was one of the 23 arrested that night - but he was subsequently released. This is Ronnie with a victim of police brutality that night.

Lau Weng San in his blog says:

Then I was dragged into the truck while punched twice on my face. The police officers applied some yellow lotion on my wounds to avoid the breeding. I managed to recognise the plainclothes who beat me. I will lodge a police report against the injuries. Ronnie and I saw him in the police station just now and Ronnie went forward to ‘interrogate’ him, asking him about his name.

This time, Ronnie is expected to be released on bail at 4.00pm.

Manoharan's third bid for habeas corpus rejected

Bernama - Nov 12 2008

Kota Alam Shah assemblyman M. Manoharan has failed for the third time to get out of Kamunting after the High Court here today dismissed his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah said that the grounds given in Manoharan’s affidavit did not fall within the ambit of the application.

“Our law only allows the court to enquire whether there is procedural non-compliance in the detention,” he said.

Manoharan filed the application on Aug 8, challenging the validity of the detention order, dated Dec 13 last year, under Section 8(1) of the Internal Security Act (ISA).

In his affidavit, Manoharan said the Home Minister’s refusal to grant him permission to attend the Selangor State Legislative Assembly sittings on May 22, 23 and 26, forcing him to take leave, tarnishes the democratic process.
He also said he was not an individual who could pose a threat to the country as he was elected as an assemblyman in the March 8 general election.

Senior Federal Counsel Abdul Wahab Mohamad objected to Manoharan’s application, saying that the grounds forwarded had no nexus with the legality of the detention.

“It is a clear abuse of the process of the court to file the instant application for habeas corpus when an earlier application had been finally determined by the Federal Court,” he said.

Manoharan’s first bid for the writ of habeas corpus was dismissed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on Dec 26, 2007. On May 14 this year, the Federal Court also ruled against him.

He then filed another application in Ipoh High Court but had it thrown out on Sept 8.

Earlier in today’s proceedings, counsel Sreedevi Naidu told the court that Manoharan wanted to appear and represent himself but the judge said: “After going through the affidavit, I find that there was no sufficient reason to allow him to appear and to represent himself in court.”

Seen in court were Ipoh Timur Member of Parliament Lim Kit Siang and blogger Raja Petra Raja Kamaruddin.