Let’s cease the pretense that an Indian poor equals a Malay poor or a native poor, says Hindraf/HRP's P Uthayakumar.
COMMENT

By P Uthayakumar
One betrays the cause of the Indian poor when he pretends that for
every Indian poor there is a Chinese poor just as badly off. And that a
Malay or a Muslim poor is under ‘equal’ duress as the Indian poor. How
can they be when for the bumiputera poor the sky is the limit?
Affirmative action is tailored for the Malays who are given ample
opportunities in higher education, business and government jobs. This is
definitely not the case for the Indian poor.
But why is the average Malaysian in a state of denial? Why does he
deliberately sidestep the gravity of Indian problems with the moral
equivalency that all the poor are in the same boat or are given the same
life jackets?
The poor Chinese have their New Villages. The poor Malay, Orang Asli,
Iban, Kadazan, etc, all have thousands of kampungs and ancestral land
as their social safety net, which 99 percent of the Indian poor do not
have. So let’s cease the pretense that an Indian poor equals a Malay
poor or a native poor.
Similarly, many of the Malay poor have been provided with jobs in the
state and federal public sector agencies, guaranteeing them a pension
and health facilities for life. What have the Indian poor to look
forward to?
Who bothered with Indians before?
The Hindraf movement arose to fill the vacuum created by the almost
zero takers for the non-politically rewarding Indian problems.
Hindraf fought without fear or favour while PKR, DAP, PAS, PSM, the
NGOs and the Indian elite closed one eye to the Indian ‘situation’ that
was becoming increasingly dire.
If Indians were not in acute distress, the Hindraf rally would not have erupted.
Before November 2007, the Tamil underclass was ignored. Post March
2008, the political opportunists who rode on our wave of discontent
chose to play to the majoritarian, especially the Malay-Muslim,
political gallery.
Today when we give voice to the woes of our constituency – the
hardcore Indian poor – we are portrayed and castigated as being
overbearing and demanding.
Are our ‘demands’ really unreasonable? Hindraf has never asked for
higher quotas for scholarships, university seats and other deliverables.
We have always demanded for equal rights which are constitutionally
ours as enshrined in Article 8 of the Federal Constitution.
In fact our motto is ‘Rights not Mercy’.
Some of us are sixth generation Malaysian-born. We too are the sons
of this soil as much as any other Malaysian. We – in respect to our
indigenousness – are even more entitled to a place in the Malaysian sun
than many recent arrivals whose rights we do not question just as we
hope they do not question ours.
Indians, our own worst enemies
Fundamentally, Indians are shortchanged by the intellectual
dishonesty which elects to dilute and divert away from the pressing and
critical Indian poor problems created by especially Umno racism.
Championing the Indian poor is unfortunately not fashionable.
When HRP and Hindraf battle against racism specifically targeting the
Indian poor, we are – most bafflingly – accused of being racist for
maintaining our focus. Yet have you ever even stopped to ponder with
some measure of honesty that there would have been no need for HRP
and/or Hindraf to exist if the Indian problems had been addressed in the
first place.
Pray tell, who among those that are not Indian is willing to make the
cause of our community’s poor their mission and to work the ground?
Yet for our necessarily selective focus on a single race, we are
accused of racism by the preening and posturing multi-culturists and
mono-culturalists who ride their high horses.
Their warped label of ‘racists’ hurled against Hindraf is to be found in no other part of the world except Malaysia.
Going by this perverted definition constantly applied to Hindraf by
our detractors, Nelson Mandela would be considered anti-white – a
veritable racist for fighting apartheid rule in South Africa because his
opponents were of one colour.
And Mahatma Gandhi would also be a damn racist as he fought the white
rajah’s rule in India. Why don’t the same people who are so fond of
knocking Hindraf similarly insist that Gandhi must be colour-blind and
that he cannot be allowed to single out a particular race (i.e. the
whites) for moral censure?
Accusing us of fighting the racism that victimizes Indians with our
own brand of Hindraf racism is just about the most convenient but lamest
excuse used by shallow, unthinking Malaysians.
This particularly applies to the English-speaking groups who love to
sound magnanimous. They are usually the Indian elites priding themselves
that their best friends are Malay and Chinese, and patting themselves
on the back for their liberal credentials because they move in social
circles not exclusive to their own kind (i.e. the dark-skinned).
Some of them may profess to have a multi-racial mindset but my own
analysis differs, even if they have not attained this self-awareness as
yet.
I believe their trapped mentality (of seeking approval and to please
others with proof of their apparent broadmindedness) arises out of a
minority and inferiority complex. Such a type of personality is the one
most prone to denying the real problems Indians face here because of
racial discrimination.
Who’s racist? You look in the mirror
For championing this cause of the Indian poor, I was detained for 514 days under the ISA and arrested on 11 other occasions.
I still have the charge of sedition hanging over my head for drawing
attention to what has been perceived to be ‘ethnic cleansing’,
especially with regard to the Kg Medan tragedy where five Indian poor
were murdered and more than 100 suffered grievous bodily harm.
The atrocities committed in Kg Medan were greeted with pin-drop
silence from the supposedly all embracing ‘multi-racial’ PKR, DAP, PAS,
PSM, NGOs as well as the so-called ‘multi-racial’ Indian elite.
We have closely documented the killings but nobody cares to get to the bottom of this ethnic issue.
For calling the massacre an ‘ethnic cleansing’, I face prosecution
for sedition which carries a three-year jail sentence. My case is still
in the courts. But I have no regrets as anyone intimate with how Hindraf
operates will know that we somehow or other soldier on despite the
nasty brickbats and the vicious catcalls.
The allegation that we are a reverse image of Perkasa is simply an
expediency to marginalize Hindraf by those who are our harshest critics.
These prefer to fish in the 60 percent Malay-Muslim majoritarian pond
because of the tantalizing vote catch. Never mind the Indian poor
kena nyaya (get screwed) on a day-to-day basis.
Our paramount interest in HRP and Hindraf is to procure justice and
equality, and to uphold human rights. We are for ending Umno rule to
achieve these ends but unlike the highly partisan opposition crowd,
we’re not willing to give a blank cheque to Pakatan.
One must be able to discern the cause of the Indian poor to know what
the Hindraf and HRP struggle is truly about. Either you feel it or you
don’t. We cannot open your eyes if you resolutely refuse to see. And
what can we do if you hear but refuse to listen?
So we’ll simply say this, quoting a Tamil proverb: ‘If a person
cannot help, he should not get in the way of those who are doing
something about it’.
P Uthayakumar’s sedition case is fixed for mention on June 24 at
the KL Sessions Court pending his appeal at the Court of Appeal to
declare the sedition charges against him unconstitutional. This article
first appeared at the Centre for Policy Initiatives website.