Friday 31 October 2014
Jihadist sought crowds to boost bomb deaths
Investigators have begun to carefully probe the background of Austria's latest radicalized teenage jihadist, whose pre-detention was extended on Wednesday afternoon after a court hearing in St. Pölten in Lower Austria.
The Local
The 14-year-old boy of Turkish origin had admitted to planning a bombing of Westbahnhof, one of Austria's busiest and largest railway stations, and had begun making enquiries into obtaining necessary parts for a bomb when police arrested him on Tuesday afternoon.
On Wednesday evening, there were media reports that as part of the radicalization process, young people had been lured into jihadism through promises that they could receive up to $25,000 (€19,800) for an assassination.
Now police and prosecutors are examining the computer, phone and other aspects of the suspect's life, including acquaintances and possible backers of the young would-be jihadist. The data analysis is expected to take days, or even weeks, according to the police.
The Regional Court in St. Pölten agreed with prosecutors that there was a flight risk with the boy, and decided to impose pre-trial detention. The teenager was "strongly suspected to have been involved in a terrorist group," it said in a press release.
Police have been investigating the young man since the beginning of October, when it was learned that he had been making increasingly radical statements that supported the Isis terrorist network, and had begun the process to acquire bomb parts.
According to one report, the boy has admitted that he had been considering locations where crowds gathered to maximize the impact of a bomb, which is why Westbahnhof was one of his targets.
The 14-year-old boy of Turkish origin had admitted to planning a bombing of Westbahnhof, one of Austria's busiest and largest railway stations, and had begun making enquiries into obtaining necessary parts for a bomb when police arrested him on Tuesday afternoon.
On Wednesday evening, there were media reports that as part of the radicalization process, young people had been lured into jihadism through promises that they could receive up to $25,000 (€19,800) for an assassination.
Now police and prosecutors are examining the computer, phone and other aspects of the suspect's life, including acquaintances and possible backers of the young would-be jihadist. The data analysis is expected to take days, or even weeks, according to the police.
The Regional Court in St. Pölten agreed with prosecutors that there was a flight risk with the boy, and decided to impose pre-trial detention. The teenager was "strongly suspected to have been involved in a terrorist group," it said in a press release.
Police have been investigating the young man since the beginning of October, when it was learned that he had been making increasingly radical statements that supported the Isis terrorist network, and had begun the process to acquire bomb parts.
According to one report, the boy has admitted that he had been considering locations where crowds gathered to maximize the impact of a bomb, which is why Westbahnhof was one of his targets.
Human Rights Defender in Sudan without Home, Country after Muslim Extremist Attack
Convert from Islam flees Darfur after trying to exercise right to free speech.
By Morning Star News
NAIROBI, Kenya (Morning Star News) – A Sudanese father of two who once worked as a human rights defender now lives in a refugee camp after surviving an attempt on his life by Islamic extremists.
Before Ibrahim Ismaeil Ibrahim, 34, left Islam and dared to criticize the religion, he worked as a writer and human rights defender in Darfur Region’s state of West Darfur for the Sudan Contemporary Center for Studies and Development. As he chronicled human rights violations by Islamic extremists, he became disillusioned with the religion and put his faith in Jesus Christ, he said.
“I defected from Islam and started writing articles through my [pseudonymous] page on Facebook, in which I described Islam as a religion of terror and killing,” he said. “Then some people discovered my identity and sent me messages of intimidation on my phone that they were looking for my head. Suddenly, I was attacked.”
At his home in the West Darfur capital of Geneina in January 2013, Ibrahim, his wife and two young children were unhurt in the late-night attack by what he believes was one of the Islamic extremists threatening him.
“An unknown Islamic extremist broke into my house at midnight and opened fire on my room,” Ibrahim told Morning Star News. “I managed to flee Geneina.”
His employer contacted Front Line Defenders, an organization dedicated to assisting human rights defenders, especially those in danger; the group provided him funds for an airline ticket to Cairo, Egypt from Khartoum and accommodation for three months, he said.
From Cairo he moved to Kampala, Uganda, and eventually he went to South Sudan. There he learned from his family in Geneina that the threat to their lives was growing stronger, and he made arrangements for them to flee to Chad.
Ibrahim also learned that, with help from the government of Sudan, he was being monitored by Muslim extremists connected to those who had planned to assassinate him. He had left his ID card when he fled Geneina, and the assailants had provided it to a Sudanese government security agent, he said.
He rejoined his wife, 7-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter in Chad. Eventually the reunited family traveled to another country in Africa, undisclosed for security reasons, where they live as refugees at a U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees camp.
“Ibrahim, a brave young father, and his family have been through a hard time and suffering as they become refugees away from home because of persecution by the Muslim government of Khartoum through Muslim extremists,” a Christian source told Morning Star News.
The source, who requested anonymity for security reasons, added that the Christian family is an inspiration to other refugees from Darfur, where thousands of civilians have been killed amid conflict between Arab militias battling non-Arab rebels.
“I believe the Lord will work through Ibrahim and his family, and that they will be a blessing to many of their communities and families who live with them from Darfur,” the Christian source said. “Many of our Sudanese brothers and sisters who have been victims of war and religious persecution are desperately in need of the mercy of the Father through Jesus Christ, because all that they have seen is complete agony and devastation in the Muslim world.”
Following South Sudan’s split from Sudan in a 2011 referendum, the government in late 2012 began ridding the country of Christianity. It has bulldozed several church buildings, closed others and deported South Sudanese who have live most if not all of their lives in Sudan, as well as many foreigners. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir has said post-secession Sudan will adhere more exclusively to Islam and Arabic culture.
On June 30 bulldozers demolished the Sudanese Church of Christ in the Thiba Al Hamyida area of North Khartoum as church members watched, with security personnel threatening to arrest them if they tried to block their efforts, church members said. On Feb. 17, bulldozers accompanied by local police and security personnel destroyed the Sudanese Church of Christ building in the Ombada area of Omdurman, across the River Nile from Khartoum, without any advance notice.
Officials gave no reason for the demolition except that, as it was located in a “Muslim area,” the 300-member church was not wanted there, a church member said. Another source, a church leader, confirmed to Morning Star News that authorities destroyed the building and confiscated the land without warning. The orders came from the Ombada locality, or city council, sources said.
Besides raiding Christian bookstores and arresting Christians, authorities threatened to kill South Sudanese Christians who do not leave or cooperate with them in their effort to find other Christians (see Morning Star News).
Due to its treatment of Christians and other human rights violations, Sudan has been designated a Country of Particular Concern by the U.S. State Department since 1999, and in April 2013, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommended the country remain on the list.
Ibrahim, the source said, deeply loves Sudan and has supported those oppressed under the regime of Bashir, especially Christians who have been tortured.
“He has dedicated himself to bringing awareness to the free world to get engaged in their plight,” he said. “Let us all keep praying for Ibrahim’s family, that their situation will get better.”
If you or your organization would like to help enable Morning Star News to continue raising awareness of persecuted Christians worldwide with original-content reporting, please consider collaborating at http://morningstarnews.org/donate/?
NAIROBI, Kenya (Morning Star News) – A Sudanese father of two who once worked as a human rights defender now lives in a refugee camp after surviving an attempt on his life by Islamic extremists.
Before Ibrahim Ismaeil Ibrahim, 34, left Islam and dared to criticize the religion, he worked as a writer and human rights defender in Darfur Region’s state of West Darfur for the Sudan Contemporary Center for Studies and Development. As he chronicled human rights violations by Islamic extremists, he became disillusioned with the religion and put his faith in Jesus Christ, he said.
“I defected from Islam and started writing articles through my [pseudonymous] page on Facebook, in which I described Islam as a religion of terror and killing,” he said. “Then some people discovered my identity and sent me messages of intimidation on my phone that they were looking for my head. Suddenly, I was attacked.”
At his home in the West Darfur capital of Geneina in January 2013, Ibrahim, his wife and two young children were unhurt in the late-night attack by what he believes was one of the Islamic extremists threatening him.
“An unknown Islamic extremist broke into my house at midnight and opened fire on my room,” Ibrahim told Morning Star News. “I managed to flee Geneina.”
His employer contacted Front Line Defenders, an organization dedicated to assisting human rights defenders, especially those in danger; the group provided him funds for an airline ticket to Cairo, Egypt from Khartoum and accommodation for three months, he said.
From Cairo he moved to Kampala, Uganda, and eventually he went to South Sudan. There he learned from his family in Geneina that the threat to their lives was growing stronger, and he made arrangements for them to flee to Chad.
Ibrahim also learned that, with help from the government of Sudan, he was being monitored by Muslim extremists connected to those who had planned to assassinate him. He had left his ID card when he fled Geneina, and the assailants had provided it to a Sudanese government security agent, he said.
He rejoined his wife, 7-year-old son and 5-year-old daughter in Chad. Eventually the reunited family traveled to another country in Africa, undisclosed for security reasons, where they live as refugees at a U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees camp.
“Ibrahim, a brave young father, and his family have been through a hard time and suffering as they become refugees away from home because of persecution by the Muslim government of Khartoum through Muslim extremists,” a Christian source told Morning Star News.
The source, who requested anonymity for security reasons, added that the Christian family is an inspiration to other refugees from Darfur, where thousands of civilians have been killed amid conflict between Arab militias battling non-Arab rebels.
“I believe the Lord will work through Ibrahim and his family, and that they will be a blessing to many of their communities and families who live with them from Darfur,” the Christian source said. “Many of our Sudanese brothers and sisters who have been victims of war and religious persecution are desperately in need of the mercy of the Father through Jesus Christ, because all that they have seen is complete agony and devastation in the Muslim world.”
Following South Sudan’s split from Sudan in a 2011 referendum, the government in late 2012 began ridding the country of Christianity. It has bulldozed several church buildings, closed others and deported South Sudanese who have live most if not all of their lives in Sudan, as well as many foreigners. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir has said post-secession Sudan will adhere more exclusively to Islam and Arabic culture.
On June 30 bulldozers demolished the Sudanese Church of Christ in the Thiba Al Hamyida area of North Khartoum as church members watched, with security personnel threatening to arrest them if they tried to block their efforts, church members said. On Feb. 17, bulldozers accompanied by local police and security personnel destroyed the Sudanese Church of Christ building in the Ombada area of Omdurman, across the River Nile from Khartoum, without any advance notice.
Officials gave no reason for the demolition except that, as it was located in a “Muslim area,” the 300-member church was not wanted there, a church member said. Another source, a church leader, confirmed to Morning Star News that authorities destroyed the building and confiscated the land without warning. The orders came from the Ombada locality, or city council, sources said.
Besides raiding Christian bookstores and arresting Christians, authorities threatened to kill South Sudanese Christians who do not leave or cooperate with them in their effort to find other Christians (see Morning Star News).
Due to its treatment of Christians and other human rights violations, Sudan has been designated a Country of Particular Concern by the U.S. State Department since 1999, and in April 2013, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommended the country remain on the list.
Ibrahim, the source said, deeply loves Sudan and has supported those oppressed under the regime of Bashir, especially Christians who have been tortured.
“He has dedicated himself to bringing awareness to the free world to get engaged in their plight,” he said. “Let us all keep praying for Ibrahim’s family, that their situation will get better.”
If you or your organization would like to help enable Morning Star News to continue raising awareness of persecuted Christians worldwide with original-content reporting, please consider collaborating at http://morningstarnews.org/donate/?
Civil court cannot annul religious court’s order as both are of equal status, says government lawyer
The High Court was wrong to issue a mandamus order to the Inspector-General of Police to arrest a Muslim convert and return his daughter to his ex-wife in a custody case as the Federal Constitution does not allow the civil court to interfere in the affairs of the religious court, a government lawyer said today.
Senior Federal Counsel Noor Hisham Ismail told the Court of Appeal that the High Court could not annul an order of a Shariah Court due to an amendment to the Federal Constitution in 1988.
"Parliament made amendments to avoid the civil court interfering in the affairs of the Shariah court," he said in his submissions to set aside the order given by High Court judge Lee Swee Seng.
He said both courts have exclusive jurisdiction and one was not superior to the other.
In 2009, the religious court in Ipoh had granted Muhammad Ridhuan Abdullah, who was formerly known as K. Pathmanathan, the custody of his three children, Tevin Darsiny, 17, Karan Dinish, 16, and Prasana, 6, after he unilaterally converted them to Islam.
The following year, the High Court in Ipoh granted kindertgarten teacher M. Indira Gandhi full custody of all three children and Ridhuan was ordered to return Prasana Diksa to Indira.
On May 30 this year, the Ipoh High Court cited Ridhuan for contempt and issued a warrant of arrest against him after he repeatedly failed to hand over Prasana Diksa to Indira.
Indira had also obtained a recovery order from the High Court to compel the police to locate Ridhuan.
The failure of the police to act resulted in her filing for a judicial review seeking the mandamus order, as IGP Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar was insistent that police would take the middle path in cases where disputing parties had obtained separate orders from the civil and Shariah courts.
On September 12, the High Court allowed a judicial review by Indira for a mandamus order to force Khalid to arrest Ridhuan and return Prasana Diksa to her.
Khalid then obtained a stay order from the Court of Appeal on September 25.
His appeal against Lee's order was heard today before a three-man bench chaired by Datuk Abdul Rahim Abdul Aziz.
Hisham said since the Shariah Court had issued a custody order, the judge was also wrong in granting a recovery order to compel the police to locate and return the child to the mother.
However, he said the Police Act imposed a duty on the IGP to perform his function as prescribed under the law.
He said it was only a perception that non-Muslims were barred from seeking justice in the Shariah Court.
Indira’s lawyer Aston Paiva said she was a blameless person and used the court to seek a remedy to end her predictment.
"It is the husband who had gone into hiding and the mother never saw the daughter despite a High Court order in 2010," he said.
Paiva, who was assisted by M. Kula Segaran and N. Selvam, said it was wrong of Hisham to claim that a civil court could not make the mandamus order.
"The husband's defence is that he has a Shariah Court order and will not respect the High Court order to return the child," he said.
Paiva said the couple were married under civil law and their divorce and other relief like maintenance and division of property should be decided by the High Court.
"The husband's conversion to Islam does not affect the civil marriage unless decided by the civil court," he said.
He said the High Court in Ipoh intervened because the Shariah Court had exceeded its authority.
"A civil court can invalidate a Shariah Court order and this has been done many times in the past," he added.
Paiva said Indira's remedy was in the civil court because a non-Muslim spouse could not go to the Shariah Court as that forum was for persons professing the religion of Islam.
He said Khalid had ignored the High Court and made his own interpretation not to enforce the orders.
"He should have gone back to the civil court to ask for directive by making the necessary applications which he did not do," he said.
Paiva said the Shariah Court had no jurisdiction over the police as it was not a person professing the Islamic religion and as such, Khalid was not bound by a religious court order.
"Artice 121 (1A) was crafted to avoid conflict of jurisdiction and not to oust the supervisory power of the civil court," he added.
He also said there would be a state of lawlessness if the order of mandamus was not granted as it meant a civil servant could ignore the civil court.
"Public confidence in the judiciary will erode because the court can say anything it wants but orders will not be executed," he said.
Paiva said Indira would never be able to see her daughter whom she last saw when the child was 11 months old.
Lawyer Philip Koh Tong Ngee, who represented the Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism, told the bench as a friend of the court that Khalid was bound to enforce the Police and Child Acts as they were federal laws.
He said the religious court was constituted under state law.
"Article 75 of the constitution stated that when there is inconsistency between federal and state law, the former shall prevail," he added.
The appellate court reserved judgment. – October 30, 2014.
If Dr M sanctions Bible-burning, God save this country, says Masing
Outspoken Sarawak minister Tan Sri Dr James Masing, who had worked closely with Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad when he was Barisan Nasional chairman, said he had lost respect for the man he had once held in high esteem for defending Perkasa's Datuk Ibrahim Ali over the Bible-burning issue.
The Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) president said: "I used to have the highest respect for Tun Mahathir. Now I have second thoughts on his wisdom".
“In the name of Islam, and in defence of the sanctity of Islam, anything goes now,” Masing said, referring to Dr Mahathir's comments in defending Malay rights group Perkasa and its call for Malay-language Bibles to be burned.
The former prime minister said it was not a problem to burn the Bibles as long as there were good intentions.
Dr Mahathir, who is also a patron of Perkasa, added that Islam also allowed the Quran to be burned and not discarded all over the place, or to be stepped on, if it was no longer used.
"So, burning the Quran with good intentions is not a problem," he said at a public event in Kuala Lumpur.
He said Mahathir seemed to be advocating that there was only one religion in Malaysia, or that Muslims in this country were allowed to practice in any manner they wish without regard to the sensitivities of other religions.
“If a former prime minister of Malaysia sanctions the burning of Bibles, then God save this country.”
Tan Sri Bernard Dompok (pic, left), the former president of United Pasokmomogun Kadazan Dusun Murut Organisation (Upko), which is also part of the BN coalition, questioned Dr Mahathir's reasoning.“I am totally surprised that Tun Mahathir could come up with a statement like that,” said Dompok.
“He says holy books can be burned if they are already old and no longer used. But that is hardly the case here.
“By no stretch of the imagination can you equate the burning of Bibles as propagated by Ibrahim Ali, to the disposal of old books. The intention is totally different.”
Sarawak's PKR chief Baru Bian was even more hard-hitting when he said: "He's either senile or intentionally fanning hatred against the Christians”.
Baru, a state lawmaker, said if Dr Mahathir is intentionally fanning hatred, then he should be arrested and charged with sedition.
“We will wait whether this time the attorney-general has the guts to do the right thing or will he make excuses again.”
Star Sabah president Datuk Dr Jeffery Kitingan said Mahathir's statement is “stupid, provocative and incitive", coming from a "wise, old-man".
“It doesn't help in promoting peace and harmony nor the BN concept of 1Malaysia. It also shows the real Mahathir, a racial extremist and a religious bigot," he said.
Kitingan, a Sabah lawmaker, said Mahathir being a former prime minister, should be promoting peace and harmony and showing a good example to the younger generation.
On Monday, the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC), in defending its decision not to charge the Perkasa chief, said in a statement that Ibrahim's call for Bibles to be burned must be viewed in its entire context.
It said Ibrahim's statement was in response to the reported distribution of Bibles to Muslim students of SMK Jelutong in Penang.
"As decided by the court, before a statement is said to have seditious tendencies, the statement must be viewed in the context it was made.
"When studied in its entire context, Datuk Ibrahim's statement is not categorised as having seditious tendencies.
"It was clear Datuk Ibrahim Ali had no intention to create religious tension, but was only defending the purity of Islam."
Ibrahim's call last year to burn the Bibles that contained the word Allah had sparked outrage among Christian groups and politicians, with critics accusing Putrajaya of double standards in its use of the Sedition Act. – October 30, 2014.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/if-dr-m-sanctions-bible-burning-god-save-this-country-says-masing#sthash.UIIvD3P6.dpuf
No country for dogs but Syed Azmi wanted to prove otherwise
A video showing Malaysians treating a blind man and his guide dog badly spurred activist Syed Azmi Alhabshi to hold the controversial "I want to touch a dog" event that outraged many Malays, who felt it was an insult to Islam.
Syed Azmi said he was affected by the video clip when he realised people were rude towards the blind man because of the dog.
"In the video, people were shoo-ing the dog and the blind man, and that hurt me a lot because we also have projects with the blind and to be treated like that just because he was different, that hurt me.
"I asked myself, will I act differently, will I save the blind man? I don't know because I am afraid of dogs," he said to a question from the audience at the "acceptance v conventional sensitivity: where is the middle ground?" forum organised by Umno Youth last night.
Some 200 people, mostly Muslims, were at the forum which was also attended by Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin and the wing's exco member and Islamic scholar Dr Fathul Bari Mat Jahya.
Many questions were thrown at Syed Azmi from the floor, but mostly on "why did you do it?", "did you prepare gloves at the event" and "who's advice did you seek before organising the event".
Syed Azmi sounded apologetic but the situation did not get out of hand. No anger was shown towards him.
He said while watching the video, he realised many people were ignorant and did not understand about dogs.
He then wrote on his Facebook page "I think I want to touch a dog because I don't understand this concept or this issue in Malaysia" and subsequently, he received a lot of comments and feedback.
That he said, got him and his team to come up with the idea of organising the "I want to touch a dog" event, which was aimed at educating and helping people overcome their fear of dogs and learn compassion for all animals, which Islam teaches.
The October 19 event in Bandar Utama, Petaling Jaya, attracted about 1,000 Malaysians, and many took the opportunity to touch and pet dogs of various breeds, while volunteers demonstrated how the cleansing ritual was done according to Islamic rites.
Despite obtaining approval from the state religious authorities and inviting an ustaz to give a talk on Islam’s views on dogs, Syed Azmi drew flak from many Malays, who felt it was an insult to Islam.
His detractors circulated his mobile phone number on the Internet, urging the public to harass him.
He has also been the subject of death threats online, and has been accused of apostasy, of being a Christian in disguise, and of attempting to spread a new religion among Muslims
in Malaysia.
Last Saturday, Syed Azmi apologised for the furore, adding that he did not intend to insult Muslims
but only wanted to educate society to overcome their fear of dogs.At last night's forum, he again apologised for the fallout from the event and said he did not anticipate that overexcited attendees would carry and hug the dogs.
"Just like me, we expected people to be afraid of dogs. What we did not expect – we were so naive – was that some of them got 'syiok' and overexcited after touching the dogs because they were so cute that they carried and hugged the animals.
"We wanted people to overcome their fears, we never expected it to sway from our original aim of educating people and I apologise for that."
Dr Fathul Bari said although Islam was a religion that promoted discussions and respected differences, he advised the organisers of the event to be more careful in the future and to ensure conventional sensitivities were adhered to.
"Those who criticised on Facebook, please do not react so quickly," he said.
Khairy said in the greater scheme of things, the event was a small matter but what was not small was the reaction of Muslims.
That was why he was supportive of last night's forum, which he felt was needed for people to discuss the issue in a rationale manner instead of resorting to threats.
"What kind of society do we have that some has to resort to death threats? This is not the Islamic way. You do not manage disagreements by telling people you want to slap or kill them or that you don't belong to this country." – October 31, 2014.
'Semen found but no proof of penetration'
1pm: Chief justice Arifin allows Shafee's request to submit tomorrow and for the defence to reply on Monday. Court adjourns for the day.
12.55pm: Court adjourns for lunch and the prosecution is to submit in the afternoon, but Shafee (right) asks his submission to be made tomorrow morning.He says he intends to finish it tomorrow itself. The judges discuss the request.
12.40pm: Sangeet shows Anwar's cell was dirty before Anwar was placed there. She also pointed to the toilet in the cell and notes there was no sink inside.
The sink is outside the cell, she says in reply to questions from Justice Abdull Hamid on a police officer's conflicting testimony that he had heard Anwar brush his teeth, in contrast to the High Court judgment that states the police saw the opposition leader brushing his teeth.
"This shows that Anwar cannot have brushed his teeth outside, as the sink is outside the cell," she explains.
12.25pm: Ram says the sperm cells were not properly separated by the Chemistry Department.
He says the DNA evidence and scientific evidence is unreliable and hence there is no corroboration of Saiful's claim of being sodomised.
Ram points out that the hearing before the Federal Court is now in its third day, and he suggests the Court of Appeal in finding Anwar guilty and sentencing him within two days may have rushed the process.
He says as a result, the defence was not accorded a fair hearing in the Court of Appeal.
Ram finishes his submission and Sangeet continues with the defence.
Sangeet points to the lock-up diary to show the state of Anwar's cell during his detention.
12.10pm: Ram says there was no seminal stain on Saiful's trousers after the incident.
Justice Suriyadi asks if there is evidence that Saiful’s underwear was washed.
Ram says the underwear Saiful had used on the day of the alleged incident was washed but seminal stains were found on another underwear, which he did not use on that day.
"If seminal stain was found on that underwear, then there should also be similar stains on the trousers he used on the day of the incident," he adds.
Ram says the government chemist was biased in not wanting to answer questions from defence lawyers.
12.05pm: Outside the courtrrom, DAP's Ronnie Liu (right in photo) causes a commotion when he is blocked by court officers from entering the courtroom without a pass.Liu claims he and others have been entering the courtroom without a pass for two days, and thus should not be stopped.
He has given his IC to the court officers and insists on waiting till he gets a pass to enter.
12.00pm: Hence, Ram says doubt should be given to the accused.
He says that the pro-forma report from the hospital states that Saiful resisted but there were no defensive wounds.
"Yet all four doctors, including three from HKL, state there are no signs of injury. Saiful says he was ravaged in a rough manner, resulting in excruciating pain, but there is no injury."
"The doctors said there ought to be injury if there was force and resistance as stated in the pro-forma.
"If K-Y jelly was used, they should accept the evidence of David Wells that there should be signs of injury due to the amount of force used," he adds.
11.50am: Ram says while Saiful claimed that the sodomy incident took place for five minutes when he testified in court, he, however, had told Supt Jude and the HKL doctor's that it went on for 30 minutes.
"If this is so (the longer duration), there will be signs of injury. This casts serious doubt on Saiful's testimony," he adds.
11.40am: Ram says the HKL doctor did not find any signs of tear or defensive wounds on Saiful.
"There is doubt to the factum of penetration on Saiful," he adds.
He points out that Dr Mohd Osman (right) also found the anus to be normal."How do you find semen in the rectum when there is no evidence of penetration," he says, adding that unless the items are different samples.
He argues that the trial judge and the Court of Appeal judges had erred in assuming that the right samples were found.
11.30am: DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang is in court with PKR's Sungai Petani MP Johari Abdul.
10.50am: Ram says there is clear misdirection, which has created a serious miscarriage of justice when the Court of Appeal did not take this into consideration.
He further submits that the evidence from Pusrawi doctor Dr Mohd Osman Abdul Hamid should be considered, and that if he was not telling the truth in the defence case, the prosecution can readily impeach him.
"However, Dr Osman's evidence was not rebutted, despite him stating that Saiful complained of pain in his anus for a week and that plastic was inserted in Saiful's anus."
10.45am: Anwar's supporters begin to swell, with some 100 now gathered outside the Palace of Justice.
Apart from supporters, there are also those selling pro-Anwar T-shirts, with the words "Rakyat Hakim Negara".
10.30am: Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar enters the courtroom and takes a seat next to her younger sisters. Also in court is national laureate A Samad Said.
Ram Karpal continues with his submissions. He says this is a crucial issue of tampering.
According to defence expert witness Dr David Wells, he notes, the big plastic bag (P27) is not foolproof.
Ram adds investigation officer Supt Jude Pereira (left) also admitted the IGSO did not permit him to re-open exhibits that had already been sealed."The IGSO guidelines are designed to ensure the integrity of exhibits are not compromised by ensuring they are separately labelled and not mixed with other unrelated exhibits."
Justice Suriyadi Halim Omar, one of the five Federal Court judges, asks whether it is tampering the whole samples or just the cutting open of the big plastic bag, and Ram says it should be considered the whole samples as a result of the opening.
10.20am: Defence lawyer Ram Karpal says there is no reason for investigation officer Supt Jude Pereira to re-open the specimen when he went back to his office as it was already carefully sealed by the Hospital Kuala Lumpur doctors.
Pereira, he adds, cut open the P27 (the plastic bag containing the samples retrieved from Saiful).
"They (the samples) could have been compromised," he says.
"However, the appellate court defended this, saying Pereira was following the Inspector-General's Standing Orders (IGSO)."
Ram says Pereira was asked on the IGSO and the IO (investigation officer) agreed he did not follow the guidelines by the book."He says the items ought to be separated, when asked which paragraph in the IGSO says all items should be packed differently and not mixed with others.
"He had sealed all receptacles and placed them in separate plastic bags and sealed each plastic bag and placed it in the bigger plastic bag (P27), which was sealed again."
10.07am: Ram Karpal says the defence’s expert witness in the trial agreed that the 18 allele should have been reported.
"The 18 allele does not belong to ‘Male Y’. The presence of the DNA of a third party on those samples lends great weight to the defence contention that those samples must have been tampered with by third party. The IO (investigation officer Jude Periera) handled both samples.”
Ram also says there was a break in the chain of evidence.
Seah, he explains, received the samples (Saiful's) and also his trousers and underwear from Pereira on June 30 and July 1, 2008. She says she found traces of semen in B5, B7, B8 and B9.
9.51am: Defence lawyer Ram Karpal says the 18 allele is also found on the towel which was taken from the lock-up.
"The presence of the 18 allele cannot be from the doctors who examined it. The IO (investigation officer DSP Jude Blacious Pereira) may have contaminated it.
"This should be investigated further. Chemist Nor Aidora Saedon also did not investigate the presence of the 18 allele."
Apart from the towel, the 18 allele DNA profile was also found in Saiful's rectum.
"The fact that there was an 18 allele here (towel) and also in B9 (high rectum swab of Saiful) which was examined by Seah, belonged to the same person - possibly the IO - who must have tampered with both exhibits."
9.38am: Ram Karpal submits on the discovery of an 18 allele, which should have been reported. He says 'Male Y' is not the 18 allele.
"This
ought to have been reported. This means it is contaminated and we do
not know who it is. (Chemistry Department) Dr Seah Lay Hong (left) has failed to follow her guidelines (where she should report the matter)."According to the Chemistry Department guidelines, the difference between one allele to another, for example between 18 and 19, if it exceeds by 15 to 25 percent, should be reported.
This 18 allele is reported to be 25 percent higher than the 19 allele.
9.36am: Court proceeding begins with Chief Justice Arifin presiding. Four other Federal Court judges take the bench.
Defence lawyer Ram Karpal Singh continues his submission from yesterday.
9.25am: Lead prosecutor Muhammad Shafee Abdullah walks into the courtroom.
The court is preparing to get ready while Anwar is seen discussing with Gopal Sri Ram and other lawyers.The courtroom is already packed with people.
9.10am: Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim enters the courtroom. There is a slight commotion outside where loud shouting was heard.
Also in court is PKR president and wife Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and her daughter and youngest son.
With Wan Azizah is her father, Wan Ismail Wan Mahmood.
8.55am: There are representatives from the various foreign embassies present, including United States, Australia, United Kingdom and the European Union.
Also
Queens Counsel Mark Trowell is holding a watch for LawAsia and Law
Council of Australia as well as the Inter-Parliamentary Union.Among those in the public gallery is Wangsa Maju MP Tan Kee Kwong. Anwar Ibrahim's lead counsel Gopal Sri Ram arrives in court.
8.31am: People are trickling into the courtroom.
Among the opposition members already in court are Tumpat MP Kamarudin Jaafar, Batu Buruk assemblyperson Syed Azman Syed Mohamad and Kelana Jaya MP Wong Chen.
The international observers are seated on the extreme right of the court. The public gallery can fit 70 people but in the past two days, it is packed to the brim with 80 or more.
Deputy head of the prosecution division in the Attorney-General’s Chambers Mohd Hanafiah Zakaria is already in court.
For the defence, Sangeet Kaur Deo and Eric Paulsen are getting ready for the hearing.
8am: Only
a small crowd of a dozen Anwar Ibrahim’s supporters is in the vicinity
of the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. Unlike yesterday, there are no
protesters.Those milling outside the court complex are mostly police personnel and journalists.
The court case is expected to resume at 9.30am.
7.35am: The prosecution team led by government-appointed lawyer, Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, is expected to seek a longer jail term for Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim in the Federal Court as the Sodomy II case enters its third day today.
Shafee is likely to submit either later this morning or in the afternoon on the issues raised by newly appointed Anwar's lead counsel, retired Federal Court judge Gopal Sri Ram.
The Umno-linked lawyer had told journalists outside court yesterday that "there was nothing new” that was raised by Anwar's defence team over the past two days.
Throughout
the sodomy trial and the prosecution's appeal at the Court of Appeal
last March, the case was handled by the late Karpal Singh who was
tragically killed in a car crash early this year.Initially, former Bar Council chairperson Sulaiman Abdullah, who led the defence when Anwar was charged in 2008, was slated to lead the PKR de facto leader's team.
However, he has not fully recovered following a surgery to his leg, and the defence team subsequently approached Gopal Sri Ram.
In the morning, defence lawyer and Karpal’s son, Ram Karpal Singh, is expected to continue his submission on the discrepancy in the DNA findings linking ‘Male Y’ to Anwar.
Yesterday, Ram had submitted on the possibility of the samples taken from alleged victim Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's anus could be contaminated following the presence of an unidentified male DNA which was not reported by the Chemistry Department.
The unidentified DNA was found in the peri-anal and high rectum swab from Saiful.
He
also said the samples were given to the department 96 hours after the
alleged sodomy incident and yet it was found to be in "pristine"
condition.Ram (right) questioned how the samples from the low rectum and high rectum swabs could still be fresh when they were not kept in the freezer as recommended. Investigating officer DSP Jude Blacious Pereira had kept it in a steel cabinet at his office.
Sangeet Kaur Deo, another scion of the Karpal family and a member of Anwar’s huge defence team, also questioned the manner three items - a mineral water bottle, a toothbrush and a white towel - was retrieved from the opposition politician's cell when he was held overnight at the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters.
She complained that there was deception and trickery adopted by the police in trying to get Anwar's DNA after the Permatang Pauh MP had refused to give his sample at the Hospital Kuala Lumpur.
Sangeet also argued that there was no evidence that Anwar had used those items.
Malaysiakini is covering the proceedings live.
How far is the racial/political divide actually a religious divide?
So all these vices, ‘vice promoting’ events, and places of vices, must be banned. Those who resist are enemies of Islam and hence enemies of the Malays as well. Malaysia is divided into two: between those who uphold Islam and those who ‘insult’ Islam. And when we divide Malaysia between Muslims and those perceived as anti-Islam we also divide Malaysia into Malays and those seen as anti-Malays.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
When they look at the race problem that is plaguing the country, the older generation would look at what it used to be back in the 1950s and 1960s, what we call ‘zaman Merdeka’ or the Merdeka era, and would compare it with the Malaysia of today, 60 years on.
Those of us who lived or grew up in that era would understand what these people mean. Malaysia of 60 years ago and the Malaysia of today seem like two different countries.
The younger generation that just look at Malaysia of the post-Reformasi days, meaning 1998/1999, or post-2008 Malaysia, would not be able to see the glaring difference between the ‘two Malaysias’ that we are referring to. They do not have a basis for comparing the ‘two Malaysias’.
Of course, we hear or read about what the older generation have to say regarding Malaysia of the Merdeka era. But hearing about it is never the same as living it. It is like when my older generation tells us stories about the Japanese Occupation of Malaya or the turmoil in the two weeks after the Japanese surrender. You can only appreciate what happened if you were there and personally suffered the agony of those times.
The question is why was Malaysia or Malaya of 60 years ago different from Malaysia of today? What happened over those 60 years that transformed the country into what it is today, a country divided by race? I would sum it up to two reasons: religion and politics.
Religion, meaning in this particular case Islam, was never really a ‘big thing’ in the Merdeka era, if I may be permitted to describe it so. If you were religious you were religious. If you were not you were not. No one really cared what you did and everyone lived and let lived and basically did not poke their noses into other peoples’ business.
For example, I first went to Terengganu in 1972 (travelling to and fro from KL) and settled down there in 1974. At that time, we could drink beer openly at the many bars in town, and played gin rummy or poker on weekends, and danced with the ‘taxi girls’ in the only two nightclubs in Kuala Terengganu (plus those in Kota Bharu as well).
No one arrested us. No one passed judgement on us. They did not even comment about the empty beer bottles overflowing from our dustbins. We did our thing and they did their thing. Everyone was free to live the life that they wanted to live. And we did not feel uncomfortable as those in skullcaps passed our house on the way to the mosque while we drank our beer and gambled until dawn in full view of our neighbours.
I loved Terengganu so much I decided to stop shuttling up and down and became a resident of that state. On many a night we would sit in the bar with police officers from the OCPD down to the Inspectors and buy each other a beer or gin. We would also go over to the police officers’ mess to drink and partake in the Thursday night (when the nightclubs are closed) ‘blue movie’ sessions (movies confiscated as ‘evidence’ and for our viewing pleasure before the case comes up for trial).
Hell, Terengganu and Kelantan were the states to be in during the 1960s and 1970s. We had so much fun there and even when we crossed over to Golok all we needed to do was to inform the police officers in Terengganu or Kelantan and their Thai counterparts would wait at the border and escort us into Thailand as VIPs, complete with police escorts and female ‘bodyguards’.
But then in the late-1970s something happened. Anwar Ibrahim and his Islamic youth movement, ABIM, began touring the East Coast to preach the word of Islam. In 1979, we had the Iranian Islamic Revolution and this compounded the problem. Even I discarded my wayward ways and became a fundamentalist Muslim complete with Arab dressing and all.
Then we were told that Islam is not a personal religion between you and God. Islam is an adeen or way of life. We must look at Islam as not just a set of beliefs and rituals but as political Islam. Islam is politics and there is no two ways about it. Prophet Muhammad was a not a religious preacher like Jesus but was a military commander who set up an Islamic State with the Qur’an as the Constitution.
Eventually, it became a them-and-us situation. Either you are with us or you are against us. If you are not a friend of Islam then you are an enemy of Islam. And since Islam is very much synonymous with Malay (you need to be a Muslim to be a Malay), this invariably split us along racial lines as well.
So now no longer can your race, religion and politics be separated. Race, religion and politics come as a package. To be Malay you must also be Muslim and subscribe to Malay-Islam politics. So, if we divide along religious lines, we must also divide along racial and political lines.
The big change was supposed to have come in 1981. That was the year Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad took over as Prime Minister. And Dr Mahathir was perceived as the enemy of Islam. In fact, many of his statements in the early days were viewed as heretical and an insult to Islam.
Anwar Ibrahim, according to the late Ustaz Fadzil Noor’s plan, which he told me when we met in Mekah in 1982, was for Anwar to take over the Presidency of PAS. Then Islamic politics would reach its height and Umno would be ousted from power.
The great shock was when Anwar decided to join Umno instead. Nevertheless, the great Islamic divide had already happened and there was no turning back the clock. And with the Islamic divide also came the racial divide and, of course, the political divide.
Five years later PAS was ousted from Kelantan and the Malay divide became permanent.
Today, we are seeing so many problems in Malaysia. The Bible issue, the Allah word issue, the conversion issue, the body-snatching issue, the Muslim child-kidnapping issue, the evangelism issue, the beer issue, the dog issue, etc., are just some of the many problems. Then we have PERKASA, ISMA and many more that continue to divide Malaysians.
Some are religious and some are racial in nature. Some, in fact, are political. But they are all really about Islam because, as I said, race, religion and politics come as a package and cannot be separated.
You cannot be a Malay-Muslim like in the 1950s, 1960s or 1970s and still play poker, drink beer, keep dogs and dance with cabaret girls in the nightclubs. (And surprisingly these types of Malays were not corrupt or took bribes). Today, you need to reject all these un-Islamic activities and vices if you want to be a Malay-Muslim.
So all these vices, ‘vice promoting’ events, and places of vices, must be banned. Those who resist are enemies of Islam and hence enemies of the Malays as well. Malaysia is divided into two: between those who uphold Islam and those who ‘insult’ Islam. And when we divide Malaysia between Muslims and those perceived as anti-Islam we also divide Malaysia into Malays and those seen as anti-Malays.
That is the real crux of the problem. All those anti- or pro-NEP rhetoric or the Chinese school debate is not the problem. That is the by-product of the problem. We discuss those things because we are divided and not that those things divide us.
Raja Petra Kamarudin
When they look at the race problem that is plaguing the country, the older generation would look at what it used to be back in the 1950s and 1960s, what we call ‘zaman Merdeka’ or the Merdeka era, and would compare it with the Malaysia of today, 60 years on.
Those of us who lived or grew up in that era would understand what these people mean. Malaysia of 60 years ago and the Malaysia of today seem like two different countries.
The younger generation that just look at Malaysia of the post-Reformasi days, meaning 1998/1999, or post-2008 Malaysia, would not be able to see the glaring difference between the ‘two Malaysias’ that we are referring to. They do not have a basis for comparing the ‘two Malaysias’.
Of course, we hear or read about what the older generation have to say regarding Malaysia of the Merdeka era. But hearing about it is never the same as living it. It is like when my older generation tells us stories about the Japanese Occupation of Malaya or the turmoil in the two weeks after the Japanese surrender. You can only appreciate what happened if you were there and personally suffered the agony of those times.
The question is why was Malaysia or Malaya of 60 years ago different from Malaysia of today? What happened over those 60 years that transformed the country into what it is today, a country divided by race? I would sum it up to two reasons: religion and politics.
Religion, meaning in this particular case Islam, was never really a ‘big thing’ in the Merdeka era, if I may be permitted to describe it so. If you were religious you were religious. If you were not you were not. No one really cared what you did and everyone lived and let lived and basically did not poke their noses into other peoples’ business.
For example, I first went to Terengganu in 1972 (travelling to and fro from KL) and settled down there in 1974. At that time, we could drink beer openly at the many bars in town, and played gin rummy or poker on weekends, and danced with the ‘taxi girls’ in the only two nightclubs in Kuala Terengganu (plus those in Kota Bharu as well).
No one arrested us. No one passed judgement on us. They did not even comment about the empty beer bottles overflowing from our dustbins. We did our thing and they did their thing. Everyone was free to live the life that they wanted to live. And we did not feel uncomfortable as those in skullcaps passed our house on the way to the mosque while we drank our beer and gambled until dawn in full view of our neighbours.
I loved Terengganu so much I decided to stop shuttling up and down and became a resident of that state. On many a night we would sit in the bar with police officers from the OCPD down to the Inspectors and buy each other a beer or gin. We would also go over to the police officers’ mess to drink and partake in the Thursday night (when the nightclubs are closed) ‘blue movie’ sessions (movies confiscated as ‘evidence’ and for our viewing pleasure before the case comes up for trial).
Hell, Terengganu and Kelantan were the states to be in during the 1960s and 1970s. We had so much fun there and even when we crossed over to Golok all we needed to do was to inform the police officers in Terengganu or Kelantan and their Thai counterparts would wait at the border and escort us into Thailand as VIPs, complete with police escorts and female ‘bodyguards’.
But then in the late-1970s something happened. Anwar Ibrahim and his Islamic youth movement, ABIM, began touring the East Coast to preach the word of Islam. In 1979, we had the Iranian Islamic Revolution and this compounded the problem. Even I discarded my wayward ways and became a fundamentalist Muslim complete with Arab dressing and all.
Then we were told that Islam is not a personal religion between you and God. Islam is an adeen or way of life. We must look at Islam as not just a set of beliefs and rituals but as political Islam. Islam is politics and there is no two ways about it. Prophet Muhammad was a not a religious preacher like Jesus but was a military commander who set up an Islamic State with the Qur’an as the Constitution.
Eventually, it became a them-and-us situation. Either you are with us or you are against us. If you are not a friend of Islam then you are an enemy of Islam. And since Islam is very much synonymous with Malay (you need to be a Muslim to be a Malay), this invariably split us along racial lines as well.
So now no longer can your race, religion and politics be separated. Race, religion and politics come as a package. To be Malay you must also be Muslim and subscribe to Malay-Islam politics. So, if we divide along religious lines, we must also divide along racial and political lines.
The big change was supposed to have come in 1981. That was the year Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad took over as Prime Minister. And Dr Mahathir was perceived as the enemy of Islam. In fact, many of his statements in the early days were viewed as heretical and an insult to Islam.
Anwar Ibrahim, according to the late Ustaz Fadzil Noor’s plan, which he told me when we met in Mekah in 1982, was for Anwar to take over the Presidency of PAS. Then Islamic politics would reach its height and Umno would be ousted from power.
The great shock was when Anwar decided to join Umno instead. Nevertheless, the great Islamic divide had already happened and there was no turning back the clock. And with the Islamic divide also came the racial divide and, of course, the political divide.
Five years later PAS was ousted from Kelantan and the Malay divide became permanent.
Today, we are seeing so many problems in Malaysia. The Bible issue, the Allah word issue, the conversion issue, the body-snatching issue, the Muslim child-kidnapping issue, the evangelism issue, the beer issue, the dog issue, etc., are just some of the many problems. Then we have PERKASA, ISMA and many more that continue to divide Malaysians.
Some are religious and some are racial in nature. Some, in fact, are political. But they are all really about Islam because, as I said, race, religion and politics come as a package and cannot be separated.
You cannot be a Malay-Muslim like in the 1950s, 1960s or 1970s and still play poker, drink beer, keep dogs and dance with cabaret girls in the nightclubs. (And surprisingly these types of Malays were not corrupt or took bribes). Today, you need to reject all these un-Islamic activities and vices if you want to be a Malay-Muslim.
So all these vices, ‘vice promoting’ events, and places of vices, must be banned. Those who resist are enemies of Islam and hence enemies of the Malays as well. Malaysia is divided into two: between those who uphold Islam and those who ‘insult’ Islam. And when we divide Malaysia between Muslims and those perceived as anti-Islam we also divide Malaysia into Malays and those seen as anti-Malays.
That is the real crux of the problem. All those anti- or pro-NEP rhetoric or the Chinese school debate is not the problem. That is the by-product of the problem. We discuss those things because we are divided and not that those things divide us.
Anwar says he’s confident of acquittal if…
He congratules his lawyers for a "magnificent" job.
FMT
PUTRAJAYA: Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim today congratulated his lawyers for their “magnificent” job of arguing his case for acquittal from the charge of sodomy.
Addressing reporters at the end of today’s hearing of his Federal Court appeal against conviction, Anwar said he was confident of being acquitted if the court “follows the law and adheres to the principles of justice.”
“It cannot make any other decision,” he said.
The defence, with retired Federal Court judge Gopal Sri Ram heading a 14-member team, finished its submissions today. The prosecution will begin with its submissions tomorrow.
Anwar expressed disgust with the prosecution for seeking to extend his five-year jail sentence, saying the arguments presented by his lawyers over the past three days were so strong that “there is no question but to concede”.
“This is all disgusting politics,” he remarked.
He described the defence submissions as “very detailed”. “Points of law and facts were clearly stated,” he said. “There is no option but to acquit me from the frivolous charges.”
Anwar is on bail of RM10,000 pending the Federal Court decision. Last March, the Court of Appeal oveturned his High Court acquittal on the charge of sodomising his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.
FMT
PUTRAJAYA: Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim today congratulated his lawyers for their “magnificent” job of arguing his case for acquittal from the charge of sodomy.
Addressing reporters at the end of today’s hearing of his Federal Court appeal against conviction, Anwar said he was confident of being acquitted if the court “follows the law and adheres to the principles of justice.”
“It cannot make any other decision,” he said.
The defence, with retired Federal Court judge Gopal Sri Ram heading a 14-member team, finished its submissions today. The prosecution will begin with its submissions tomorrow.
Anwar expressed disgust with the prosecution for seeking to extend his five-year jail sentence, saying the arguments presented by his lawyers over the past three days were so strong that “there is no question but to concede”.
“This is all disgusting politics,” he remarked.
He described the defence submissions as “very detailed”. “Points of law and facts were clearly stated,” he said. “There is no option but to acquit me from the frivolous charges.”
Anwar is on bail of RM10,000 pending the Federal Court decision. Last March, the Court of Appeal oveturned his High Court acquittal on the charge of sodomising his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.
Will BN heed Ku Li’s warning?
UMNO’s own Ku Li warns of imminent economic collapse unless we do something drastic today.
By J. D. Lovrenciear - FMT
For quite a while Malaysians have been crying out over the uncontrolled, escalating cost of living. When opposition political parties joined the chorus or stood up to champion the rakyat’s misery, the government of the day slammed the politicians for misleading the rakyat and “politicising” the issue.
Now UMNO’s own veteran blue-chip Ku Li has voiced his concerns, warning of an imminent economic collapse if the government of the day continues recklessly with its economic and financial agendas.
The man in the street knows only too well that one cannot have a single decent meal for RM5.00 even at a stall operated by migrant workers. What more take a bus ride or train to and from work daily; put the kids through school and tuition classes; pay for their car and housing loans; re-pay PTPTN loans; and many more.
Amidst talk of a global stock market collapse and given Malaysia’s over-reliance on imported goods – including its staple rice, what will Malaysians do when the tides hit our dinner table?
We seem to be inundated with politically charged dog, cow-head, swine and ‘Allah’ issues. And to cap it all, we do not seem to see an end to sodomy cases either.
Can Malaysians continue to hoodwink ourselves any longer – especially those among us who still fight tooth and nail to keep BN at the helm?
If we side with the opposition’s clarion call for economic reform, we will be branded “ungrateful”. Now that BN’s own team player has sent out a chilling warning, what would we be branded if we joined Ku Li’s call for reform?
Let us talk basics then. What use is there to preach about creating a high income nation when the rakyat eats low income rice?
Just take the ‘imported’ and ‘AAA’ grade Thai fragrant rice sold in our supermarkets. The price is way beyond some local and ‘pre-mixed’ grades. Yet, even that imported rice is far below the premium quality rice that ordinary working-class people in Thailand, Cambodia and Myanmar eat.
Do Malaysians know this? They are eating inferior rice compared to their ‘poorer’ neighbouring countries!
Now there’s the RM25.1 billion in 2013 that was remitted by our imported foreign labor. It was only RM10.5 billion in 2009.
We are talking about only the registered foreign workers’ remittance. What about the 1 million or more illegal workers sending money out of Malaysia?
Not only are we reliant on imported food, we are happily letting our money leave the country in exchange for ‘minimum wage’ workers.
No, this must end and it should end sooner rather than later.
If opposition politicians cry out with concern, BN followers say it is politically motivated and that DAP, PAS and PKR are trying to topple the government.
When the rakyat keep crying out silently as they struggle under the yoke of increasing fuel and food costs, we are told not to be lazy and that we are spoilt from being spoon-fed.
Now that Ku Li himself is warning of a total economic collapse what have BN leaders to say? What have the pro-BN followers to say?
When and how can we, Malaysians save ourselves and this blessed nation from this madness?
Or must we now write off even Ku Li?
For quite a while Malaysians have been crying out over the uncontrolled, escalating cost of living. When opposition political parties joined the chorus or stood up to champion the rakyat’s misery, the government of the day slammed the politicians for misleading the rakyat and “politicising” the issue.
Now UMNO’s own veteran blue-chip Ku Li has voiced his concerns, warning of an imminent economic collapse if the government of the day continues recklessly with its economic and financial agendas.
The man in the street knows only too well that one cannot have a single decent meal for RM5.00 even at a stall operated by migrant workers. What more take a bus ride or train to and from work daily; put the kids through school and tuition classes; pay for their car and housing loans; re-pay PTPTN loans; and many more.
Amidst talk of a global stock market collapse and given Malaysia’s over-reliance on imported goods – including its staple rice, what will Malaysians do when the tides hit our dinner table?
We seem to be inundated with politically charged dog, cow-head, swine and ‘Allah’ issues. And to cap it all, we do not seem to see an end to sodomy cases either.
Can Malaysians continue to hoodwink ourselves any longer – especially those among us who still fight tooth and nail to keep BN at the helm?
If we side with the opposition’s clarion call for economic reform, we will be branded “ungrateful”. Now that BN’s own team player has sent out a chilling warning, what would we be branded if we joined Ku Li’s call for reform?
Let us talk basics then. What use is there to preach about creating a high income nation when the rakyat eats low income rice?
Just take the ‘imported’ and ‘AAA’ grade Thai fragrant rice sold in our supermarkets. The price is way beyond some local and ‘pre-mixed’ grades. Yet, even that imported rice is far below the premium quality rice that ordinary working-class people in Thailand, Cambodia and Myanmar eat.
Do Malaysians know this? They are eating inferior rice compared to their ‘poorer’ neighbouring countries!
Now there’s the RM25.1 billion in 2013 that was remitted by our imported foreign labor. It was only RM10.5 billion in 2009.
We are talking about only the registered foreign workers’ remittance. What about the 1 million or more illegal workers sending money out of Malaysia?
Not only are we reliant on imported food, we are happily letting our money leave the country in exchange for ‘minimum wage’ workers.
No, this must end and it should end sooner rather than later.
If opposition politicians cry out with concern, BN followers say it is politically motivated and that DAP, PAS and PKR are trying to topple the government.
When the rakyat keep crying out silently as they struggle under the yoke of increasing fuel and food costs, we are told not to be lazy and that we are spoilt from being spoon-fed.
Now that Ku Li himself is warning of a total economic collapse what have BN leaders to say? What have the pro-BN followers to say?
When and how can we, Malaysians save ourselves and this blessed nation from this madness?
Or must we now write off even Ku Li?
AG’s statement on Bible-burning boggles the mind
Section 3(3) of the Act makes it abundantly clear that "intention" (however good) is irrelevant.
By Stanley Isaacs - FMT
The recent public statement by the Attorney-General giving his reasons for not prosecuting Ibrahim Ali for sedition has not in any way allayed the discontent of many people including even a cabinet minister.
They cannot understand, and rightly so, why this man is being protected from prosecution.
On the contrary the reasons given by the AG is nothing but mitigation for the man whose outburst was a call to Muslims in this country to commit a serious crime under the Penal Code.
If indeed the story given in the AG’s Statement is true that there was an attempt by a non-Muslim student to distribute Bibles to students including Muslim students, the AG should know very well that if the act constituted an offence, it was an offence by the student or students concerned.
The offence does not extend to the Bible or to the millions of people in Malaysia who use the Bible as their holy book.
Would not those millions of Christians be troubled and offended by the call of that man to seize and burn Bibles? Does not such a call constitute a “seditious tendency… to promote ill will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Malaysia” within the meaning of Section 3 of the Sedition Act?
It was reported in a news portal on October 27 that Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said, “It is up to the Attorney-General. My personal opinion is when one says they want to burn the holy book of another, that is seditious.”
The AG gave two reasons why he chose not to prosecute Ibrahim. One was that, taken in its overall context, the man’s call to seize and burn Bibles did not have a seditious tendency.
The other was that the man had “no intention to offend or to provoke”. Both those reasons are flawed in law because they are not defences recognised by the Sedition Act.
On the contrary Section 3(3) of the Act has made it abundantly clear that “intention” (however good) of the person uttering the statement, is irrelevant if the statement has a seditious tendency.
It boggles my mind how the AG could excuse the man on grounds of his good intention when the law says otherwise.
It also boggles my mind how burning the Bible would defend the sanctity of the Islamic religion.
In such a prima facie blatant case of sedition as this, the AG would have done well to let the court decide if Ibrahim was entitled to the defence of “context” and “intention” as given by him.
Now, what about the many others who in a swoop, were recently charged for sedition? Were the considerations of “context” and “intention”, even though not valid considerations, not applied to them also before they were charged?
I think not.
Stanley Isaacs is the former Head of Prosecution, Attorney-General’s Chambers Malaysia.
The recent public statement by the Attorney-General giving his reasons for not prosecuting Ibrahim Ali for sedition has not in any way allayed the discontent of many people including even a cabinet minister.
They cannot understand, and rightly so, why this man is being protected from prosecution.
On the contrary the reasons given by the AG is nothing but mitigation for the man whose outburst was a call to Muslims in this country to commit a serious crime under the Penal Code.
If indeed the story given in the AG’s Statement is true that there was an attempt by a non-Muslim student to distribute Bibles to students including Muslim students, the AG should know very well that if the act constituted an offence, it was an offence by the student or students concerned.
The offence does not extend to the Bible or to the millions of people in Malaysia who use the Bible as their holy book.
Would not those millions of Christians be troubled and offended by the call of that man to seize and burn Bibles? Does not such a call constitute a “seditious tendency… to promote ill will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Malaysia” within the meaning of Section 3 of the Sedition Act?
It was reported in a news portal on October 27 that Minister Khairy Jamaluddin said, “It is up to the Attorney-General. My personal opinion is when one says they want to burn the holy book of another, that is seditious.”
The AG gave two reasons why he chose not to prosecute Ibrahim. One was that, taken in its overall context, the man’s call to seize and burn Bibles did not have a seditious tendency.
The other was that the man had “no intention to offend or to provoke”. Both those reasons are flawed in law because they are not defences recognised by the Sedition Act.
On the contrary Section 3(3) of the Act has made it abundantly clear that “intention” (however good) of the person uttering the statement, is irrelevant if the statement has a seditious tendency.
It boggles my mind how the AG could excuse the man on grounds of his good intention when the law says otherwise.
It also boggles my mind how burning the Bible would defend the sanctity of the Islamic religion.
In such a prima facie blatant case of sedition as this, the AG would have done well to let the court decide if Ibrahim was entitled to the defence of “context” and “intention” as given by him.
Now, what about the many others who in a swoop, were recently charged for sedition? Were the considerations of “context” and “intention”, even though not valid considerations, not applied to them also before they were charged?
I think not.
Stanley Isaacs is the former Head of Prosecution, Attorney-General’s Chambers Malaysia.
Growing Islamic fundamentalism seen pushing Malays to quit country
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 30 — Malays could be next in line after the Chinese to leave the country, in a bid to escape the growing religious fundamentalism and authoritarianism that leaves little room for free thought and dissent, according to activists and observers.
While Malaysia bills itself as a moderate Muslim nation, recent developments have demonstrated an increasingly conservative and hard-line approach to Islam here that is intolerant of cultures and practices not sanctioned by religious groups and authorities.
Malaysians for Malaysia convener Azrul Mohd Khalib said the Friday sermons prepared by the religious authorities that paint non-Muslims as enemies of Islam, as well as the use of labels such as liberalism, pluralism and humanism to vilify fellow believers, have dismayed and scared Muslims.
“Thinking Muslims are being marginalised and persecuted,” Azrul told Malay Mail Online yesterday.
“It is creating a climate of fear, suspicion and prejudice. Because of that, Muslims who do not prescribe to that belief system do not see themselves as being welcomed or even tolerated in this country,” the social activist added.
Azrul said many Muslims have started emigrating in the past 15 years based on anecdotal evidence, noting that Islamic authorities prohibit dissent and discussions of the country’s predominant religion.
“You are told ‘you cannot use logic and rationale to understand and practise Islam. ‘You must only refer to the Quran and hadith and nothing else’,” he said.
Hadith are “traditions” from the time of Prophet Muhammad that are not contained in the Quran.
Former de facto law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim said on Tuesday that more Malay-Muslims could be expected to leave the country if local religious authorities continue to pursue and prosecute those whose opinions they deem “deviant”.
Over the years, Islamic authorities have gradually become more rigid in their interpretation and application of the Shariah code in Islam.
They vilified and attacked a recent dog-petting event in which some Muslims touched dogs, which are considered unclean here in Malaysia. The programme triggered such outrage that its organiser received death threats.
On Tuesday, the National Fatwa Council issued an edict banning Muslims from “celebrating” Halloween, which it categorised as a Christian celebration of the dead.
Kelantan this month began enforcing a by-law that empowers state authorities to fine Muslim men up to RM1,000 or jail them for up to a year, or both, for failing to attend Friday prayers thrice in a row.
An Oktoberfest-themed beer festival in Selangor also drew the ire of Muslim groups earlier this month, despite the promotional event being targeted at and restricted to non-Muslims.
Muslim intellectual Kassim Ahmad is also being prosecuted by Islamic authorities for allegedly suggesting that Muslims need only follow the Quran, and not the accompanying Hadith. The view differs from that which is officially approved.
Malaysia has also outlawed the Shiah denomination of Islam, which it considers deviant from the Sunni school that is officially sanctioned here.
Malaysia’s religious authorities also frequently warns against liberalism, with the federal government’s Islamic Development Department (Jakim) reminding Muslims last week in its Friday sermon that this concept, along with pluralism, was a threat to Malay-Muslim unity as it could weaken their faith.
Jakim also said the National Fatwa Council had in its 74th meeting in 2006 declared liberal thinking as heretical.
“The very same liberal ideas, which are condemned and persecuted, are actually what made Islam a great humanist religion. Look back at history. Our religious authorities have lost their way and like the Pied Piper of Hamelin, are leading others astray,” Azrul said.
Social activist Datin Paduka Marina Mahathir said she knows of several Malays who say they do not want to return to their homeland.
“It’s not for economic reasons, but simply because they feel that the environment here has become so negative and oppressive that it’s impossible to be able to live as peaceful, productive citizens any more,” Marina told Malay Mail Online.
“You just never know when something that is perfectly acceptable one day becomes ‘haram’ the next day,” she added, using the Malay word for “forbidden”.
The daughter of former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad also noted the discomfort with the authorities’ continuous intrusion into people’s private lives at the expense of more important things such as injustice against women.
Global Movement of Moderates (GMM) CEO Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah said most of the leaders and intellectuals of “kaum muda” (young moderates) used to seek refuge in Penang and Singapore during the 1930s.
“Because in Penang and Singapore, they are more free to share their thoughts. Because there is less institutionalised religious authorities that would go after them,” Saifuddin told Malay Mail Online.
“The kaum muda were simply practising their intellectual freedom to interpret Islam in a more progressive way. And Islam allows that. You can have different interpretations. And Islam encourages dialogues among those with different opinions, not to prosecute, unless of course, if your opinion is tantamount to treason or glaringly unlawful,” the former deputy minister added.
Centre for Policy Initiatives director Dr Lim Teck Ghee said Malays in Malaysia are following the trend of Muslims in other Muslim countries who flee to Western nations, such as Australia, the US and European Union countries, to escape religious fundamentalism and political authoritarianism at home.
But he acknowledged that Malaysia has no statistics on the racial and religious breakdown of the country’s migrant outflow.
“I expect younger educated Malays to be concerned with the growing religious extremism and intolerance and to have this as the major factor in making them leave,” Lim told Malay Mail Online.
“Out-migration for Malaysians has never been solely about making a better living abroad. It has been the combination of socio-economic and political factors. Non-Malays have felt the pain of religious and racial discrimination. Now it is the turn of many Malays to feel a similar sense of deprivation and injustice,” the political analyst added.
According to a World Bank report in 2011, an estimated one million Malaysians are residing overseas.
More than two million Malaysians have emigrated since Merdeka.
Last year, a total 308,834 high-skilled Malaysians moved overseas, with 47.2 per cent going to Singapore, 18.2 per cent to Australia, 12.2 per cent to US and the rest to other countries like UK and Canada.
According to the same report, the number of skilled Malaysians living abroad rose 300 per cent in the last two decades, with two out of every 10 Malaysians with tertiary education opting to leave for either Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries or Singapore.
Extreme Situations Warrant Prosecution Intervention On Seditious Issues - A-G
PUTRAJAYA,
Oct 30 (Bernama) -- Prosecution intervention on seditious issues is
deemed neccesary as situations have become too extreme, says
Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail.He said the level of tolerance and understanding which existed among the people in the country was being eroded and this might affect current and future generations.
He said in the past, there was no need for prosecution intervention as the people were able to handle comments on seditious cases maturely and patiently. However, the situation has changed.
"In the past, inappropriate social behaviour and language were unacceptable and those crossing the line were immediately stopped by their political and community leaders.
"Today, prosecution intervention is considered necessary as the situation has gone to the extreme," said Abdul Gani when speaking at the Attorney-General's Chambers monthly assembly here Thursday.
He said there were differences between orderly campaigns to discuss and debate issues and campaigns meant to undermine the country's sovereignty and public order.
These included attacks on religion, race and culture, the constitutional monarch and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, as well as calls for Sabah and Sarawak to leave the Federation of Malaysia.
"It must be recognised that no government can stop its people from discussing matters relating to their constitutional and legal rights.
"This is part of the accountability and transparency of any elected government in any country in the world. Similarly, also recognised are actions taken to respect ideals created by the Federal Constitution.
"All rights should be respected and implemented unless the Federal Constitution has been amended through a vote or a referendum of the people. This is because, all the elements are elements of a social contract which is the pillar of the Federal Constitution and Malaysia," he said.
Abdul Gani also reminded that the freedom of speech in a multiracial and multireligious country should be held with responsibility and respect to the sensitivities of other people.
"Today, technological development is speeding up the dissemination of information, regardless of whether it is good or bad. As soon as we hit the button, we are no longer in control of the destination of an information. We should therefore, think carefully of our action and its consequences," he said.
On the decision not to charge Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali for sedition, Abdul Gani said an indepth examination of the statements made by Ibrahim found he had carefully laid out his statement.
Ibrahim had said he did not intend to create a religious commotion but to protect the sanctity of Islam under the law.
He said the Perkasa president had clearly stated that he meant the group which distributed the special Bahasa Melayu-version Bible which mentioned Allah to Malay students.
At a media conference later, Abdul Gani said each person was entitled to defend his own religion, so long as it was not against the law.
"It is not easy to charge someone in court, without complete facts, information and report. It is better if the department takes one case to court and win, rather than bringing 10 cases to court and win only five," he said.
On Jan 21, last year, police reports were lodged against Ibrahim for calling on Muslims to seize and burn copies of the Bible which contained the word, 'Allah' or other Arabic and Jawi religious words at a media conference after a Perkasa convention in Penang.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)