Share |

Wednesday 3 April 2013

Hindraf dares Kit Siang to an open debate

N Ganesan, via e-mail

After studying the contents of the DAP Gelang Patah Plan for the Indians, it is very obvious that most of the plan is plagiarised from Hindraf’s five-year Blueprint. After having been through the effort to draw up the blueprint ourselves, we cannot understand how a serious document in this category can be developed otherwise within 24 hours.

Since a large part of the Gelang Patah document really comes from the Hindraf Blueprint, we cannot understand why in the first place DAP does not want to endorse the Hindraf Blueprint itself or negotiate on it till it becomes acceptable and then to endorse it.

In our opinion if DAP is sincere there was abundant opportunity to have worked with us on this matter since November of last year. But they let all of that slip and just before the General Elections and in a matter of hours they turn up with this plan.

In our opinion all of this reeks of political opportunism and another impending grand deception for the Indian poor. We cannot stand by and watch another attempt to cheat the poor people and to run off with their votes and then return peanuts to them.

The sincerity of DAP in coming up with this document in this manner right on the eve of the GE and announced in a constituency that Lim Kit Siang is rumoured to contest, is really questionable. There are over 12,000 Indian voters (12%) in Gelang Patah .

DAP Chairman Karpal Singh had just on the the 30th of March called on Waytha Moorthy to end his Hunger Viratham and resume discussion with Anwar Ibrahim. He also urged Anwar Ibrahim to find an amicable solution to end the Hindraf blueprint stalemate.

The next day Lim Kit Siang announces the Gelang Patah Plan. We find all this baffling. We are left wondering if there is any seriousness at all in this entire episode. So, instead of us just calling the effort insincere, we will let the people decide, if the effort is sincere or otherwise.

We call upon Lim Kit Siang personally for such a a debate in front of an open audience to clear the air on this. We will debate the proposition that the “DAP Gelang Patah Plan for the Indians is not a sincere plan to address the problems of the Indian poor in comprehensive and permanent ways.”

We hope Lim Kit Siang will accept this challenge and show the country that Hindraf is wrong , that DAP is indeed sincere in trying to improve the lot of the Indian Poor. If however, Lim Kit Siang does not accept this challenge , then we have to conclude that DAP is doing what they are doing only because it is good politics – nothing more, nothing less.
Please let us know through an open acceptance or you can contact me, N Ganesan at 012 -480-3284 and let us know of your acceptance and we will arrange the necessary details for the event.

GE13: PKR hit by yet another sex allegation


(The Star) - PKR has been hit by another round of allegations of sexual misconduct after a photograph of two of its Penang leaders in a compromising position went viral.

Claiming that the picture of him with the woman leader was “superimposed”, Bayan Baru PKR deputy chief Tan Seng Keat criticised it as “gutter politics”.

However, Tan, a municipal councillor, said he would not be lodging a police report following advice from party leaders.

“Certain people are out to tarnish my reputation as the general election is around the corner,” he said in an interview here yesterday.

“I know the leader as we are both in the same party.

“They (party leaders) want me to focus on my role as the elections director for the Bayan Baru parliamentary constituency.

“They don't want me to get distracted by such nonsense.”

The woman, said Tan, used to be an assemblyman's aide before she quit in December last year.

“From what I know, she is a piano teacher at a music centre,” said Tan, who is married with two children.

When contacted, the woman accused “opponents of PKR” of being desperate in trying to sabotage the party ahead of the elections.

“I am considering whether to lodge a police report,” she said.

“Even if I do, it will be difficult to trace the culprit,” said the woman, who declined to reveal her marital status or age.

Last week, PKR vice-president N. Surendran had said that the party would investigate images on the Internet that allegedly showed a Kedah PKR official performing an indecent act while chatting with a woman online.

In ALOR SETAR, state PKR chairman Datuk Wan Salleh Wan Isa confirmed that the man was a senior member in the party.

The Kedah PKR disciplinary board, he said, had initiated investigation into the lewd video.

North Korea sparks crisis over workers from South

Paju, South Korea (CNN) -- North Korea on Wednesday stirred up fresh unease in Northeast Asia, blocking hundreds of South Koreans from entering a joint industrial complex that serves as an important symbol of cooperation between the two countries.

The move comes a day after Pyongyang announced plans to restart a nuclear reactor it shut down five years ago and follows weeks of bombastic threats against the United States and South Korea from the North's young leader, Kim Jong Un, and his government.

The fiery North Korean rhetoric, fueled by recent U.N. sanctions over its latest nuclear test, has created a tense atmosphere on the Korean Peninsula just as the United States and South Korea are engaged in joint military exercises in South Korean territory.

Pyongyang's threat last month of a possible pre-emptive nuclear strike on the United States and South Korea caused particular alarm, despite heavy skepticism from analysts and U.S. officials that the North Korean military is anywhere near capable of carrying out such an attack.

The United States has in turn made a show of its military strength in the annual drills, flying B-2 stealth bombers capable of carrying conventional or nuclear weapons, Cold War-era B-52s and F-22 Raptor stealth fighters over South Korea.

North Korea's decision Wednesday to prevent South Korean workers and managers from entering the Kaesong Industrial Complex, which sits on the North's side of the border but houses operations of scores of South Korean companies, is a tangible sign of the tensions between the two sides.

It's also a move that could end up hurting Pyongyang financially, since Kaesong is considered to be an important source of hard currency for Kim's regime.

More than 50,000 North Koreans work in the zone, producing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of goods each year. Those workers earn on average $134 a month, of which North Korean authorities take about 45% in various taxes.

The North had threatened at the weekend to shut down the industrial complex.

A 'cash cow'

"We are highly skeptical that they will close this cash cow, as some recent reports have suggested," Stephan Haggard, professor at the School of International Relations and Pacific Studies at the University of California, San Diego, wrote in an article published Monday.

"But if they did, the costs would be higher for the North than for the South," Haggard wrote in the article for the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington-based research organization.

Seoul said it "deeply regrets" the North's decision to stop South Koreans from entering Kaesong.

"North Korea's action creates a barrier to the stable operation" of the complex, the South Korean Unification Ministry said in a statement, urging its neighbor to "immediately normalize" the entry and exit process.

And South Korean Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin said military action could be taken if the safety of the South Koreans in the zone were to come under threat.

"If there is a serious situation, we are fully ready, including military measures," he said at a meeting of lawmakers, the semiofficial South Korean news agency Yonhap reported.

The North has blocked the crossing into Kaesong before.

In March 2009, also during joint U.S.-South Korean military drills that it said were a threat, Pyongyang shut the border, temporarily trapping hundreds of South Korean workers in the industrial complex.

It allowed many of the stranded workers to return to South Korea the next day, and fully reopened the border about a week later without explaining its reversal.

Hundreds of workers

It was unclear Wednesday whether the latest drama over Kaesong would play out in similar fashion.

At the start of the day, when the North informed the South that it would prevent new entries to the complex, there were 861 South Korean workers in there, according to the Unification Ministry. The North said it would continue to let people leave the zone.

Hundreds of workers rotate in and out of Kaesong each day in a series of scheduled entries and exits. Many of them stay there for several nights.

A total of 484 workers were registered Wednesday to enter the complex, the ministry said, and 446 were registered to leave.

During the late morning and early afternoon exit windows, only a trickle of workers was seen returning to South Korea from Kaesong, far fewer than the scores who were registered to leave at those times.

South Korean authorities didn't immediately provide an explanation for the discrepancy, saying the individual companies decide when to send workers back.

Kim Kyong-sin, the manager of a textile manufacturing company in Kaesong who came back into South Korea on Wednesday, said some people were staying in the complex because "they are worried they might not be able to come back in."

During the March 2009 crisis, many South Korean companies with operations in the zone chose to keep more workers there to compensate for those not being allowed in.

Kim said he was scheduled to go back into Kaesong on Thursday, but wasn't optimistic.

He said there were concerns inside the zone that the blockage at the border could cause supplies of production materials and food for workers to run out within days.

"I think if this continues there, business will be affected," Kim said. "I think the damage will be serious."

Kerry calls North 'reckless'

U.S. and South Korean officials have kept up their criticism of the North's actions in recent days.

John Kerry, the U.S. secretary of state, warned Tuesday that the United States will not accept North Korea as a "nuclear state."

"The bottom line is simply that what Kim Jong Un is choosing to do is provocative. It is dangerous, reckless," Kerry said during a joint briefing in Washington with South Korean Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se.

"And I reiterate again the United States will do what is necessary to defend ourselves and defend our allies, Korea and Japan," Kerry added. "We are fully prepared and capable of doing so, and I think the DPRK understands that."

DPRK is short for Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the official name for North Korea.

The North has said that its nuclear weapons, which it describes as a deterrent, are no longer up for negotiation.

Kerry's comments came hours after Pyongyang's declaration that it would restart the reactor at its Yongbyon nuclear complex.

The statement demonstrated Kim's commitment to the North's nuclear weapons program that the international community has tried to persuade it to abandon.

Crisis has 'gone too far'

The North Korean announcement was followed by a plea for calm from U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who is South Korean.

North Korean defectors return rhetorical fire

"The current crisis has already gone too far," he said in a statement from Andorra. "Nuclear threats are not a game. Aggressive rhetoric and military posturing only result in counteractions, and fuel fear and instability.

"Things must begin to calm down, as this situation, made worse by the lack of communication, could lead down a path that nobody should want to follow."

On Tuesday evening, U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel spoke with Chinese Minister of National Defense Gen. Chang Wanquan, the Pentagon said.

China is a key ally of North Korea, but it has expressed disappointment and frustration with some of Pyongyang's recent actions. It supported the U.N. Security Council's tougher sanctions on Kim's regime last month.

"The secretary emphasized the growing threat to the U.S. and our allies posed by North Korea's aggressive pursuit of nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs and expressed to General Chang the importance of sustained U.S.-China dialogue and cooperation on these issues," Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said.

During the saber-rattling of the past few weeks, Pyongyang has severed a key military hot line with Seoul and declared void the 1953 armistice that stopped the Korean War.

This week, the United States positioned two warships and a sea-based radar platform near the Korean Peninsula to monitor North Korean military moves, defense officials said.

Seoul, meanwhile, on Monday warned that any provocative moves from North Korea would trigger a strong response "without any political considerations."

Parliament dissolved


Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak dissolves Parliament to pave the way for Malaysia's 13th general election.

PUTRAJAYA: After keeping the country in suspense for more than a year, Parliament was today dissolved to pave way for the 13th general election.

Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak announced today that he met the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to obtain consent on the dissolution of Parliament, this morning and the King has consented to the request.

Najib made the announcement in a live telecast address, beamed nationwide from here. Also present was his deputy Muhyiddin Yassin.

As such, all Barisan Nasional-held State Legislative Assemblies would apply for dissolution to ensure a simultaneous parliamentary and state assembly election.

With the dissolution of Parliament, the EC will now meet soon to set the nomination and polling dates of the national polls.

The announcement puts an end to speculation of the date of the polls over the last 18 months.

It is learnt that the EC would announce the nomination and polling dates this week or latest by early next week.

FMT also learnt that Cabinet ministers had their group photo taken prior to the Cabinet meeting today.

Both sides of the political divide are confident of capturing more than half of the 222 parliamentary seats at stake.

At the last election, the ruling coalition produced one of its worst election performances losing its long held two-thirds majority in Parliament, and at the same time losing four state government to Pakatan Rakyat opposition pact made up of PKR, DAP and PAS.

The election result forced then prime minister and Umno president Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to vacate his seat.

The 13th general election will be the first election for Najib as Prime Minister.

PI Bala's wife and children missing, claims lawyer

Private eye P Balasubramaniam's wife, A Santamil Selvi, and her children are mysteriously missing from their family home in Rawang, Bala's lawyer Americk Sidhu revealed today.

Americk said that Selvi had become incommunicado since yesterday morning.

Last Saturday, a few members of the press and even police officers showed up at her home after an SMS was circulated claiming that she would file a police report to claim that her husband had been paid by lawyers to make the false first statutory declaration (SD1).

Americk admitted his fears that she could be pushed to make a similar U-turn as Bala had done.

In 2006, just one day after signing SD1, in which he implicated Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor in the murder of Mongolian translator Altantuya Shariibuu, Bala retracted it and signed a second SD which claimed that the first was signed under duress.

Bala passed away on March 15 from a heart attack shortly after returning from self-imposed exile in Chennai. He had been campaigning for Pakatan Rakyat.
Americk said on Monday, two “journalists” had appeared at Bala’s house claiming that their editors had told them that Selvi wanted to make a statement.

She denied this to the reporters, but seated in a black car, they were seen to be taking pictures of the house from a distance.

According to Americk, neighbours had informed Bala’s friend that the whole family had left the house in their car at about 10.15am yesterday and have not been reachable since then.

A family friend had today visited the house to notice that the family dog was out of it’s cage and roaming out in the front porch, with the front gates closed.

“The neighbours are also missing and have been uncontactable all day,” he said, adding that the turn of events was very “uncharacteristic” of Selvi.

Strong Hindu agitation after Hindu woman forcefully converted to Islam and married by Muslim kidnapper in Pakistan.


Hindus protest after woman forcefully converted to Islam in Pakistan
Hindus protest after woman forcefully converted to Islam in Pakistan

Hindus protest after woman converted to Islam in Pakistan (Jacobabad, Sindh).

ISLAMABAD | TOI | 30 MARCH 2013:: Members of Pakistan’s minority Hindu community staged a protest in southern Sindh province after a Hindu woman converted to Islam and married a Muslim man, according to a media report on Saturday.

The protest and a “wave of anger” within the minority community led to the postponement of polls for the Hindu panchayat in Jacobabad on Friday.

Reports from Jhanjhri Street area of Jacobabad said Ganga, the daughter of gold trader Ashok Kumar, married Asif Ali, son of another gold trader Bahadur Ali Surhio, at Amrot Sharif Dargah after converting to Islam, the Dawn reported.

Ganga changed her name to Aasia. The woman’s parents and several relatives rushed to the shrine after learning about the conversion but the marriage had already been registered.

They returned to Jacobabad and lodged an FIR that alleged Ganga was kidnapped by Asif Ali, his father, a brother named Abid Ali, and another man identified as Miran Bukhsh. Asif Ali was not at his residence but his father, brother and Miran Bukhsh were arrested.

The Hindu community of Jacobabad took to the streets and organised a protest against the “kidnapping” of the woman. Angry groups of local residents called for a strike and postponement of the Hindu panchayat polls till the matter was settled.

Heated arguments over the polls created an ugly situation and police had to be called in to restore order.

Incumbent panchayat chief Harpal Das Chabria told several hundred voters and their candidates that kidnapping of Hindu girls and their “forced conversion” had increased for some time.

He appealed to authorities to check the trend and provide protection to Hindus in Sindh.

A rally was organised from Janta Hall in Jacobabad against the alleged kidnapping. People marched to the local press club, shouting slogans for Ganga’s reunion with her family.

Hindu leaders warned that if their demand was not met, the community would observe a strike across the city and start an agitation.

Some Hindus alleged Sarafa association president Samiullah Surhio was involved in the alleged kidnapping.

However, Surhio told the media that he had nothing to do with the matter.

The Hindu community in Sindh has been up in arms since last year over the alleged abduction and forced conversion of several women.

Saudi Criminal's Sentence: Paralysis

(Newser) – When he was 14, Ali al-Khawahir stabbed his best friend in the back, paralyzing him for life. Now, because of an eye-for-an-eye sentence, al-Khawahir is facing paralysis as well. The Saudi Arabia man can only avoid the sentence by raising more than $266,600, the amount his victim requested in order to forgive his attacker. He has been jailed for the 10 years since the attack, the Saudi Gazette reports, but GlobalPost says a court decision on the sentence was made yesterday. A campaign has been organized to help raise the money, since al-Khawahir's family is poor.

Mumbai Police circular says girls being trained for Jihad at Islamic organisation

Mumbai Police has kicked up a controversy following its circular which says the women's wing of an Islamic organisation is "brainwashing and training girls for Jihad".

The outfit has threatened legal action if no apology is tendered by the police.

The "internal circular" said the Girls Islamic Organisation (GIO) of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, one of the country's largest Islamic organisations that runs 40 high schools and three junior colleges in Maharashtra, has been operating with the objective of "brainwashing college and school girls and train them for jihad".

"The group GIO is related to Jamaat-e-Islami Hind and it was established in Kerala. The purported aim of this organisation is to make more and more Muslim women aware of their religion and the holy Quran. But the real objective of this organisation is to brainwash school and college girls and train them for jihad," the circular, issued last month, says.

The document, meant for internal circulation, got leaked and has invited the wrath of Jamaat with its Maharashtra spokesman Mohammad Aslam Ghazi threatening to sue the police department if it does not apologise.

Ghazi alleged it was a deliberate attempt to tarnish the image of the socio-religious organisation.

"The circular was leaked with vicious intentions. The allegations against GIO are false and baseless," he said.

"The Mumbai Police either has to prove the allegations or apologise for the error. Otherwise, we would sue them for defamation," said Ghazi, adding their organisation worked for "peace, justice and to fight against prejudice of the state machinery".

Mumbai Police spokesman Satyanarayana Choudhary said "the circular was meant to be only for the department and not for public."

Earlier, Mumbai Police had got embroiled in a row over a poem by a traffic police inspector Sujata Patil published in an issue of the force's in-house journal Samwad where she had described last year's Azad Maidan protesters as "snakes" and "traitors" whose hands should have been "chopped off".

Amid threat of legal action and mounting anger of Mulim organisations, Patil had apologised in writing. The apology was published in the next issue of Samwad.

Najib urges Petronas staff to back BN, announces RM1,000 handout

KUALA LUMPUR, April 2 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak announced today a “token of appreciation” of RM1,000 each to staff of the national oil company Petronas ahead of elections expected soon.

Najib (picture), who is also finance minister tasked to oversee Petronas, said the cash gift was Putrajaya’s appreciation for the company’s contribution to the economy.

“The board and management have recommended a small gesture to bring cheer to the staff.

“Finally, I decided to accept the recommendation. A RM1,000 token will be given to all staff as a gesture of our appreciation, so spend it wisely,” he told some 4,000 Petronas employees at a town hall meeting at the Kuala Lumpur Conventional Centre here.

Earlier in his speech, Najib urged Petronas employees to continue backing the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition, the founder of the national oil firm whose contribution to its success is crucial.

He warned against voting the opposition into power, accusing the Pakatan Rakyat pact as enemies of Petronas since many of its proposals, including increasing state oil royalties and keeping fuel prices low, went against the interests of the company.

Najib said Petronas and BN have shared a long and beneficial relationship since its formation in the early 1970s and that putting power into an untested government could be detrimental to the firm.

“So when the time comes, I hope you decide wisely,” he said.

Today’s cash gift follows several other handouts dished out to key constituents under government programmes such as the popular 1 Malaysia People’s Aid (BR1M) and increased allocations for loans targeted towards Bumiputera businesses.

Najib will be seeking his own mandate at Election 2013 where he will face an uphill battle to restore BN’s two-thirds parliamentary majority.

BN lost its customary supermajority and five states in the last national polls.

The dismal performance led to the removal of Najib’s predecessor Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his subsequent appointment as prime minister on April 3, 2009.

Tomorrow will mark his fourth year as the country’s sixth prime minister.

Kapar MP hits back at unfair media report on crime


In Kapar, the ratio of police to residents is 1:2000, so how can he be blamed for 'worsening' gangsterism? asks Kapar MP S Manikavasagam.

PETALING JAYA: A Pakatan Rakyat MP has lodged a police report against the New Straits Times over an article linking him to the problem of gangsterism in Kapar.

Kapar MP, S Manikavasagam, lodged the report against the national daily and its reporter at 11.30am here at the Klang district police station, urging the police and Home Ministry to take stern action.

Manikavasagam, who was accompanied by a dozen PKR members, claimed the NST report was politically motivated. He claimed it was instigated by someone from within PKR to tarnish his reputation among the residents of Kapar.

“What NST has done is irresponsible and goes against journalistic ethics. I will file a defamation suit against NST and the reporter,” he told FMT.

Yesterday, NST published a news report on Kapar titled “Gangsterism, main worry of Kapar folk”, claiming that Manikavasagam had “worsened” the problem by bailing out the suspects.

Manikavasagam denied the allegation and challenged both NST and the reporter to reveal the “list of suspects” bailed out by him as alleged.

He also expressed his suspicion on the source of the article.

“As the general election nears, someone is trying very hard to sideline me from Kapar. I am very sure the news was planted by a PKR man,” he added.

However, Manikavasagam refused to reveal who that “someone” was, except to say that it was a “party internal matter”.

Only two police stations

When asked to elaborate on the crime allegations, Manikavasagam said that the key reason was inadequate police force.

“There are only two police stations in Kapar, which caused a lot of problems in the constituency with about 142,000 voters.

“This is a large constituency and the current ratio of police to population is one is to 2,000.

“How are you going to handle such a large constituency with two police stations?” he asked.

Manikavasagam said he had sent several letters on the issue to the top police officers urging them to increase the number of police personnel here, but todate there has been no response.

“The police are under the federal government. They should take action to solve the gangsterism issue here. I have raised the issue in Parliament so many times, ” he said.

He also expressed disappointment with the Home Ministry for deliberately overlooking Kapar since Pakatan took over the state in 2008.

Signature campaign

Meanwhile, NGOs in Kapar have begun a signature campaign urging PKR’s top leadership to allow incumbent Manikavasagam to defend his seat in the 13th general election.

The NGOs pledged to give their support to Pakatan if Manickavasagam was retained.

It is learnt that some 2,000 residents have already signed the petition.

It was reported that PKR has decided to replace Manikavasagam in Kapar with Selangor executive councillor Dr Xavier Jayakumar.

PKR is planning to field Manikavasagam in the Bukit Melawati state seat.

Duo blasts DAP blueprint

Ex-DAP man Tuan Tat and Gerakan's Baljit Singh doubt if the DAP can deliver on its promise to Indians as the blueprint has yet to be endorsed by its Pakatan allies.

GEORGE TOWN: DAP’s 14-point blueprint for the Indian community is nothing but a desperate attempt to fish for votes, alleged a former DAP branch leader and a Gerakan politician.

Tan Tuan Tat, the ex-DAP Taman Seri Sungai Pelek branch chairman and Baljit Singh, Penang Gerakan’s legal and human rights bureau head, said the blueprint raised many questions.

They doubted that the DAP can deliver the blueprint since it has yet to be endorsed and adopted by its Pakatan Rakyat partners, PKR and PAS.

Baljit recalled Pakatan de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim promising to absorb some Indian issues into the already launched coalition manifesto, although he has done nothing thus far.

He asked why did the DAP hastily and hurriedly prepare and launch a blueprint, that too in Gelang Patah of all places, without consulting its allies.

Baljit is curious to know the fate of the blueprint should PKR and PAS reject it on the usual and oft-quoted grounds of multiracial politics.

“It is clearly an eyewash: a piece of paper to hide DAP’s failure to deliver anything worthy to Indians in the last five years.

“DAP thought the blueprint can arrest the waning Indian support to the party and Pakatan,” Baljit told FMT here today.

Many ethnic Indians were frustrated when Pakatan’s manifesto failed to address their woes. Their disenchantment deepened when Pakatan also ignored Hindraf’s blueprint for them.

Is DAP going its separate way?

Their anger against Pakatan boiled over when Hindraf leader P Waythamoorthy held his 21-day hunger strike to compel both Pakatan and BN to endorse Hindraf blueprint.

Switching into defensive mode, Pakatan leaders claimed that they did not need to endorse the blueprint as the coalition’s Orange Book or Buku Jingga tackled them all.

However, until today Pakatan leaders have not been able to show which portion of the Buku Jingga featured Hindraf’s blueprint.

Baljit questioned the need for a separate DAP manifesto if indeed Pakatan’s Buku Jingga, which formed the basis of the coalition manifesto, had addressed Indian issues.

“Is it the DAP’s way of showing its displeasure against Buku Jingga and Pakatan’s manifesto for failing to address Indian issues? Is DAP going separate way from its allies?” he asked.

Tan was curious to know how DAP suddenly became very caring and concerned about Indians when the Chinese-dominated party never bothered about them all these years.

Besides being the ruling party in Penang, he pointed out that DAP dominated the Pakatan government in Selangor and for a while in Perak, before the state fell to BN.

However, he said the DAP had not carried out any projects or programmes in these states to benefit the Indian community, especially those in the poorer rung of society.

“Suddenly DAP comes up with an overnight blueprint for Indians. Suddenly DAP is so caring about Indians and their welfare,” said Tan.

He asked if the blueprint was ever tabled for approval at the party highest’s decision-making body, the central executive committee (CEC).

He also raised doubts if chairman Karpal Singh was aware of the blueprint since he had called on Pakatan leaders to resume talks with Hindraf leadership on their blueprint.

“If DAP has a blueprint duly endorsed by the CEC, why should Karpal ask Pakatan to find an amicable solution to Hindraf’s blueprint?”

The 14-point DAP blueprint tagged, “The Gelang Patah Declaration: Vision and Strategy for Indian Empowerment”, is supposed to improve the standard of living for the Indians.

It was launched by the party senior leader Lim Kit Siang, who will contest the Gelang Patah parliamentary seat.

DAP’s blueprint for Indians is a copy of Hindraf’s

Is DAP's declaration for the Indians just intended to create an illusion of action substituting for real action, asks Hindraf advisor N Ganesan.
COMMENT

By N Ganesan

I am really sad to see DAP go this way. The so-called Gelang Patah Declaration of DAP is no more than a plagiarised version of Hindraf’s five-year blueprint document.

Eleven out of the 14 items in the DAP document are straight out from Hindraf’s blueprint.

The fact that its blueprint was revealed on the 21st day of P Waythamoorthy’s hunger strike indicates as though DAP was scurrying to cover its behind against charges of abandoning the cause of the Indian poor.

Not one of the DAP leaders had anything to say for all of 20 days about the endorsement of the Hindraf blueprint – which was the key demand of the hunger strike. On the 21st day –DAP pull this out of its sleeves, and within 24 hours.

Look at the timing of DAP’s declarations and actions for the Indian poor – just days before the general election. What was the party doing for all the five years up to now? No action in five years and then now a declaration.

The items in this declaration could easily have been carried out in the DAP Penang state government in all five years of its rule, but were not.

Housing for the marginalised: large and numerous developments in Penang have been approved in the last five years, but hardly any noticeable effort for the marginalised poor.

Alienate land for temples and burial grounds: land is a state matter; DAP could easily have done this in Penang in these last five years instead of talking about it after five full years in its declaration just before the next election. Did this realisation just come to the DAP or is this its standard modus operandus?

Provide land to Tamil primary schools: similarly with land for the Tamil schools. Worse here. Not only did the DAP government not grant land to the 23 partially aided Tamil schools in the state, requests for land for Tamil schools in Penang coming from the PIBGs (Parent-Teacher Associations) were ducked using a variety of techniques, were denied outright or the PIBGs were manipulated to avoid causing embarrassment to the state government with such requests.

So, it raises the question: is this declaration just intended to create an illusion of action substituting for real action?

The double speak game

The DAP leaders made a promise to the Kampung Buah Pala folks in 2008 in Penang and they totally reneged on their promise.

That is a precedent for the value of all their promises. This declaration is put forward as a promise.

I wonder how much commitment there is now to this promise. Whatever they did eventually for the Kampung Buah Pala folks, was because of the pressure that was brought to bear on them; it was not out of any obligations to their promises.

The Pakatan argument against the Hindraf’s blueprint has always been that it is race-based and not need-based.

May I ask “what based” is this Gelang Patah Declaration when 11 out of 14 items in it come from a “race-based” document.

This double speak is so typical of what we have been seeing lately in Pakatan.

If you have been following the story, the first Pakatan manifesto had zero election pledges addressing the problems of the Indian poor. Then after an uproar from the people, it included five items into the revised manifesto (the additional items also came from the Hindraf blueprint).

Then seeing that this was not cutting it enough, the number of items taken up has now gone up to 11.

In 2008, Pakatan hijacked the Hindraf rallying cry “Makkal Sakthi”. In 2013, it is now attempting to hijack Hindraf’s blueprint. It is shameful.

Is this all the intellectual capability the DAP can muster? Is copying the best it can do? It is so shameful for a national party to plagiarise. How much commitment can there be in any effort like this?

We are wondering why this Gelang Patah Declaration did not extend to include the most impactful intervention such as a Felda type of land allocated contract farming proposal. Why was this not copied out as well from Hindraf’s blueprint?

DAP supremo Karpal Singh on March 30 called on Anwar Ibrahim to endorse Hindraf’s blueprint. The next day, his son Gobind Singh was in Gelang Patah beside Lim Kit Siang to unveil this DAP blueprint. What circus is this?

April Fool’s plan

P Ramasamy, the Deputy Chief Minister ll of Penang, had said in a YouTube interview that there are not even 800 Indian members in DAP nationwide. That is about 0.04% of the total Indian population.

DAP clearly does not represent the Indians. It has no business putting out an April Fool’s plan like this to continue to deceive and fool the Indians in the country.

This Gelang Patah plan is not to empower Indians but to empower the Indian mandores in DAP.

Why was this plan not done at the Pakatan manifesto level? Why now come up with a DAP document and then get endorsement from the partners?

This sounds exactly like what Hindraf is attempting. This is DAP’s blueprint that has been endorsed, just sounds like Hindraf’s moves. Convenient to confuse the people with.

Is the Gelang Patah Declaration DAP’s declaration or is it Lim Kit Siang’s declaration – a political device to deceive the Indian people of Gelang Patah. Some 12% of the electorate of Gelang Patah, or 12,000 voters, are Indians.

Are the elements of this plan not covered in the Buku Jingga as we are repeatedly told or are you admitting that the Buku Jingga does not really address the problem and therefore it requires a special plan?

If that is the case, then all the arguments why the Hindraf blueprint cannot be endorsed by Pakatan are just not valid.

Our advice to DAP is to stop this kind of tomfoolery. No more April Fool’s gimmicks please. Rise to the challenge with some real stuff.

N Ganesan is Hindraf’s national advisor.

Demi Agama, Bangsa dan Tanah air


MELAYU MAHUKAN PERUBAHAN

DARI SERONOK JADI MARAH

Sudah tentu tajuk di atas menggembirakan pihak yang menyokong pembangkang. Keseronokan ini akan berubah apabila dikatakan majoriti orang Melayu yang mahukan perubahan ialah  mereka yang tinggal di Kedah, Pulau Pinang, Kelantan dan Selangor. Marah pula nampaknya yang tadi kelihatan seronok.
 
PERUBAHAN YANG BERLAKU
 
Perubahan yang dikehendaki oleh orang-orang Melayu, malahan yang bukan Melayu juga, bermula setelah kemenangan Barisan Nasional dalam PRU ke 11 pada tahun 2004. Prestasi kerajaan sejak kemenangan itu begitu meleset sehingga pengundi, termasuk ahli-ahli UMNO menunjukkan protes mereka menyebabkan kemelesetan prestasi BN dalam PRU ke 12 pada tahun 2008 apabila BN kalah di lima buah negeri dan banyak kerusi Parlimen dalam Wilayah Persekutuan dimenangi oleh pembangkang.
Sekitar setahun setelah memenangi dengan tipis PRU ke 12 ahli-ahli UMNO telah menyedarkan pemimpin tertinggi parti bahawa negara memerlukan perubahan di peringkat pucuk pimpinan kerajaan pusat. Maka berubahlah pucuk pimpinan kerajaan dengan bergantinya Perdana Menteri.
 
ALASAN MELESET PRESTASI
 
Penganalisa pihak dalaman parti UMNO mengetahui bahawa perubahan yang berlaku dalam PRU ke 12 ialah atas kehendak orang-orang Melayu sendiri, kerana melesetnya prestasi kerajaan. Pihak penganalisa yang pro Pakatan Rakyat pula ingin percaya bahawa pengundi menyokong dan menyetujui dengan program mereka, walau pun pemimpin mereka mengetahui sebab yang sebenarnya.

PERINGKAT AWAL PERUBAHAN
Di peringkat awal kerajaan pimpinan Dato' Seri Najib kelihatan seolah-olah programnya adalah tindakbalas ke atas janji-janji PR. Ejen-ejen PR telah berjaya menanamkan bibit sebab kegagalan dalam PRU ke 12 sebagai berpunca dari Dasar Ekonomi Baru. Bibit ini telah bermula subur apabila Model Ekonomi Baru diperkenalkan sebagai alternatif dan bukan lanjutan kepada hasrat dan cita-cita DEB. Lebih-lebih lagi apabila timbul dakwaan bahawa ada di antara ahli penggubal MEB ini tidak fasih di dalam Bahasa Melayu.

Oleh kerana perasaan takut banyak pemimpin Melayu, dari berbagai sektor, atas kemungkinan terkorbannya kepentingan Melayu dalam pembangunan negara maka rata-rata kita merasa gelisah sehingga NGO-NGO Melayu telah bersatu untuk menubuhkan MPM atau Majlis Perundingan Melayu. Oleh kerana MPM merupakan NGO yang non-politik maka PERKASA di bawah pimpinan aktivis Dato' Ibrahim Ali telah bergerak dengan agenda politik pro-Melayu yang jelas dan lantang. Dewan Perniagaan Melayu Malaysia (DPMM) dan PENAWAR ( dulu Pakku ) juga telah mengadakan kongres, konvensyen dan seminar untuk meleraikan kegelisahan yang timbul di hati para peserta. 

BERWAWASAN, TERSENDIRI DAN ORIGINAL

Setelah beberapa bulan berlalu jelas kelihatan, dengan terserlah, bahwa program kerajaan BN di bawah pimpinan Dato' Seri Najib adalah berwawasan, tersendiri dan original.

Begitu berkesan kegiatan Perdana Menteri sehingga seorang penulis chauvinis bernama Kee Thuan Chye telah mencetak buku keduanya yang bertajuk 'Ask for No Bullshit, Get Some More!'. Buku pertamanya ialah 'No More Bullshit, Please, We're Malaysian'. Bagi beliau menolong Melayu untuk mengimbangi dengan bukan Melayu dalam bidang ekonomi ialah 'Bullshit' dan kerajaan kini nampaknya telah menghidupkan semula semangat DEB dengan pendekatan yang baru.

Yang paling ditakuti oleh pengarang yang merasa dirinya terpandai ialah sokongan Melayu yang sudah kembali kepada kerajaan.

SIKAP GOLONGAN SINIS

Rancangan BR1M adalah sesuatu yang sangat berkesan bagi masyarakat yang memerlukan. Bagi mereka yang lumayan pendapatannya pemberian kerajaan ini dianggap tidak betul, tetapi mereka ambil juga duit itu.

Pemberian wang tunai adalah relevan dan ianya lebih relevan bagi orang berpendapatan rendah dari membina jalan baru, kerana dengan wang tersebut seseorang itu boleh membeli apa yang diperlukan dan diminati, dikehendaki atau diperlukan.

Di waktu saya kecil di bangku sekolah rendah saya sering ke Pulau Pinang untuk beristirehat di rumah keluarga saya yang agak berada di musim cuti sekolah. Setiap kali saya ke Penang saya dibawa ke kedai kasut Bata di tepi Farmasi Tong Aik di Penang Road untuk membeli kasut kulit kerana emak saudara saya memikirkan saya perlu hidup lebih mewah dan belajar pakai kasut kulit.

Bila saya balik ke Yan kasut itu saya jual kerana saya lebih selesa dengan kasut getah dan kasut kulit pula tidak pernah dipakai oleh kanak-kanak sekolah.

Jika emak saudara saya memberi RM30-00 kepada saya ianya pasti lebih berharga daripada kasut kulit RM85-00 kerana saya boleh beli apa yang saya perlukan dengan RM30-00 seperti pensil dan kasut getah. Inilah BR1M bagi saya.

Baru-baru ini saya menerima panggilan telefon dari seorang kawan rapat saya menyatakan seorang pemandu teksi, yang teksinya dinaiki beliau, telah mengatakan bahawa semua pemberian lesen oleh kerajaan kepada pemandu teksi ialah disebabkan adanya tokoh pembangkang. Mereka lupa bahawa di waktu ketua pembangkang menjadi Menteri Kewangan beliau tidak pernah terfikir untuk memberi bantuan sebegini.

JANJI

Negeri-negeri di bawah pemerintahan Pakatan Rakyat pula jelas tidak mampu melaksanakan janji-janji yang mereka ketengahkan dalam pilihanraya. Protes ke atas kerajaan negeri Kedah (dengan balaknya), Pulau Pinang (dengan perumahannya), Selangor (dengan airnya) dan Kelantan (dengan tanahnya) datangnya dari rakyat negeri itu sendiri termasuk ahli dan pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat yang tidak lagi mempercayai janji-janji pemimpin mereka.

Slogan ' Janji Ditepati ' yang diketengahkan oleh BN adalah garis pemisah antara BN dan Pakatan Rakyat yang memungkiri janji
 
PAKATAN YANG TIDAK SEPAKAT
 
Oleh kerana Pakatan Rakyat hanya satu pakatan, seperti kanak-kanak sekolah berpakat, dan tanpa janji dalam dasar yang konkrit, maka perubahan dasar berlaku dalam parti yang kononnya sepakatan tetapi sebenarnya berdiri sendiri. Pendirian yang jelas hanya pada DAP sebagai pembangkang, walau pun pemimpin mereka berkelahi sesama sendiri. PAS pula terpaksa tunduk kepada tekanan DAP bukan saja sampai mengambil tindakan yang memalu dan memesongkan, kerana terpaksa merubah dasar dari matlamat mewujudkan sebuah negara Islam kepada mewujudkan sebuah negara kebajikan tetapi terpaksa akur kepada DAP sehingga membolehkan penggunaan nama Allah untuk semua ugama walau pun bertentangan dengan pendirian Dewan Ulamanya sendiri.
Sudah tentu apabila pemimpin PAS terpaksa merobah pendirian pihak DAP mengetahui bahawa kompromi ini boleh diterima kerana jika impian mereka untuk memerintah berhasil maka Kabinet Pakatan Rakyat akan membolehkan penggunaan nama Allah oleh semua ugama kerana Dewan Ulama tidak ada dalam kabinet yang membuat keputusan itu. Pada waktu itu sebarang protes oleh Dewan Ulama tidak berguna lagi kerana kuasa yang sudah diperolehi sudah memperkuatkan pendirian 'kafir kharbi' itu dan boleh bertahan sehingga PRU ke 14. Pada waktu itu semuanya sudah terlambat.

Antara perubahan yang dijangka berlaku ialah di Kelantan. Di bawah ini diperturunkan sebuah karangan oleh bekas Timbalan Menteri yang pernah menjadi Setiausaha Khas kepada Tun Abdul Razak. Beliau adalah seorang tokoh yang perndapatnya perlu diberi perhatian. Beliau ialah Tan Sri Abdullah Ahmad dan karangan ini telah disiarkan dalam akhbar Sinar Harian pada 6 Februari, 2013. Begini huraiannya:

TAN SRI ABDULLAH AHMAD
Suka duka, PRU-13 mengulangi sejarah politik sebelum peristiwa Mei 13, 1969: parti perkauman, pelampau Cina DAP secara solo cuba menggulingkan kerajaan perikatan Melayu, Cina dan India.
 
Sekarang, DAP bersekutu, berpakat seperti 2008, dengan Pas dan PKR mengepalai Pakatan mencuba bagi kali ketiga untuk menewaskan kerajaan pribumi, Cina dan India.
 
DAP sudah bijak, sedar Malaysia dapat dikuasainya hanya melalui proksi Melayu-Islam mereka. DAP akhirnya menerima hakikat Perdana Menteri mesti Melayu-Islam.
 
DAP, ikut tradisi konglomerat Cina dan antarabangsa, menerima pelantikan Melayu-Islam sebagai pengerusi tetapi kuasa mutlak tetap berada di tangan mereka.
 
Ramalan interim saya, BN menang dengan majoriti selesa. Apa pun performance dan kemenangan Umno kali ini lebih baik dan lebih besar. Walaupun matahari kembali menyinari Najib Tun Razak, kerajaan Umno dan BN, janganlah pula burung terbang dipipiskan lada.
 
Sudah kelihatan keyakinan Umno makin meningkat, seorang dua pemimpinnya terlalu optimis, menelah, mencongak BN akan menang 2/3.
 
Selepas tsunami politik 2008 kerajaan dan Umno di bawah kepimpinan Perdana Menteri Najib Tun Razak kelihatan telah pulih dan kini menikmati cahaya matahari; lebih segar.
 
Seperti kata Speaking, “It (Umno) is enjoying some patches of sunshine”. Najib bisa melihat ke hadapan dengan lebih yakin lagi. Namun cuaca di Kelantan, Selangor dan Pulau Pinang terus mendung; cuaca di Kedah cerah sedikit. Perak menjadi rebutan sengit.
 
Di lain negeri Umno/BN diduga terus memerintah.
 
Secara kebetulan dua kali saya balik ke Kelantan, Perdana Menteri dan Timbalan Perdana Menteri berada di sana, dan hinggap di hotel yang sama walaupun kami tidak terserempak.
 
Hanya saya nampak permaidani merah terbentang dari pintu masuk ke lif; di lobi hotel dan di luar hotel sesak dengan pelobi, penyokong dan ahli Umno, busybodies - majoriti berpakaian kemeja merah dan wanitanya blaus putih. Mereka ke hulu ke hilir atau duduk berkumpulan, berbisik antara satu sama lain.
 
Nampaknya, gembira bukan kepalang, menunggu pemimpin tertinggi mereka; ada cium tangan, ada menghulur sampul surat – memohon atau membuat petition!
 
Kerusi Parlimen 222, kawasan majoriti absolut Cina hanya 50 sahaja, bakinya adalah kawasan peribumi dan kawasan campuran. Medan pertempuran sengit  bertumpu dalam 172 kawasan ini. Dalam kawasan absolut majoriti Cina, DAP diduga menang mudah tetapi belum tentu lagi kerana orang Cina selalunya praktikal.
 
Mereka mungkin memberi DAP 30 hingga 40 kerusi, bakinya untuk calon Cina dari parti komponen BN. Takdirnya DAP sapu semua, itu satu tanda “konfrontasi” macam Indonesia-Malaysia pada 1963 bermula. Akhirnya Sukarno digulingkan oleh Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia yang diketuai Jeneral Suharto.
 
Pas, PKR mengepalai pertempuran di medan peribumi-Islam ini. Mereka berhasrat merampas minimum separuh kerusi itu, yakni 86. Lebih dari jumlah kerusi ketiga-tiga parti kini ada dalam Parlimen ke -12. Saya rasa berdasarkan laporan terkini, Pakatan tidak akan berjaya; andainya mereka sukses (40 + 86) mereka menang dengan kelebihan 30 kerusi! Kalau percaya propaganda Pakatan, perang sarafnya mereka akan TKOkan BN di federal dan negeri.
 
Jelas dapat dilihat dari lounge dan ruang santapan pagi Hotel Renaissance, Kota Baru gambar berwarna Najib dan bakal calon BN kawasan Parlimen Kota Baru Fahmi Salleh; senyum lebar terpapar di billboard dekat pintu masuk sekolah bercaption, “Tolong saya agar saya dapat membantu anda”, kurang lebih begitulah. Poster dan billboard serupa itu juga kelihatan di merata kawasan Kota Baru sudah berbulan-bulan lamanya. Mula-mula kelihatan bulan Jun tahun lepas. Nampaknya, poster dan billboard itu sudah pudar sedikit, tukarlah dengan poster dan billboard baru; kan dana banyak, sponsor pun ramai.
 
Di Tanah Merah dan Pasir Mas perang poster BN dan Pas (jarang kelihatan poster atau bendera PKR) telah bermula. Di Ketereh, Machang dan Pengkalan Chepa, perang iklan baru saja bermula. Saya belum lagi lihat pintu gerbang Pas atau BN tetapi pos kedua-dua parti ada di beberapa tempat.
 
Orang politik di Kelantan sudah demam kerana tidak sabar lagi menunggu PRU-13. Di Kelantan, pilihan raya adalah satu pesta, bukan saja menunaikan tugas sivik tetapi juga satu musim untuk bersosial dan berinteraksi secara bebas!
 
Pencabar Tok Guru Nik Aziz adalah menteri semenjak 1990an lagi, Mustapa Mohamed, menteri Kelantan paling lama bertahan. Mustapa dan Tok Guru kedua-duanya lemah lembut. Mustapa lebih muda. Saya kagum dengan Tok Guru, walaupun sudah berusia lapan dekad, inilah komen Speaking, “Tok Guru is 80 years old plus and he has spent the last 23 years working with, and competing against people who are generally much younger than him and he has beaten them all – walaupun Tok Guru sudah tua, dia telah menewaskan semua yang lebih muda darinya”.
 
Mustapa janganlah pandang ke belakang lagi, pandang ke depan, “onward and upward”. Janganlah terlampau gemar keluar negeri lagi. Berhentilah “makan angin”, duduklah di Kelantan kalau serius mahu ke depan, kalau mahu mendaki gunung politik yang lebih tinggi lagi.
 
ASAL JANGAN AGAH INSYA ALLAH BOLEH MENANG

Jika saya perlu tambah kepada pandangan Tan Sri Abdullah Ahmad ini ialah untuk menasihati supaya pemimpin, khususnya 'winnable canndidate' di Kelantan hendaklah tidak agah.
 
 
BAHAYA MEMILIH PEMIMPIN YANG SALAH
 
Dalam persiapan menunggu PRU ke 13 banyaklah pemimpin-pemimpin dari semua parti berkempen untuk memenangkan calon mereka. Bagi parti DAP calon di kawasan yang besar peluang mendapat kemenangan pasti diletakkan calon dari kalangan keluarga pemimpin atau yang sama 'kharbi'nya dengan pemimpin mereka. Bagi PAS juga begitu; kalau yang Islam hendaklah yang tidak menyeru kepada perpaduan ummat Islam dan yang sudi menukar perjuangan dari menegakkan hukum hudud dan negara Islam kepada menegakkan negara kebajikan untuk menjayakan program seperti yang dilaksanakan oleh kementerian kebajikan masyarakat di satu masa dulu. PKR pula, yang banyak pemimpinnya pernah menjadi ahli dan pemimpin UMNO, mereka terima siapa saja yang ingin menentang UMNO, tetapi yang dirasakan tipis menang akan diperuntukkan kawasan yang 50/50. Bagi PKR pemikiran politik yang bertanding tidak dianggap perlu kerana yang dibenarkan berfikir hanyalah ketuanya.
 
Cara berkempen pula terserah kepada kepada kepakaran calon sendiri. Asal dapat memburukkan pihak UMNO dan BN kebenaran fakta tidak perlu difikirkan. Cari saja pegawai kerajaan, tentera dan polis yang kecewa waktu memegang jawatan supaya mereka dapat membalas dendamnya melalui saluran politik.
 
Pengundi hendaklah tidak lupa bahawa masa depan negara banyak bergantung pada barisan pemimpin kerajaan setelah selesai pilihanraya. Yang banyak berkempen tetapi tidak berperanan dalam pimpinan kerajaan tidak lagi berkuasa apabila selesai pilihanraya, kecualilah jika pemimpin itu didukung oleh struktur parti yang menyeluruh dan berfungsi.
 
Anwar Ibrahim, Karpal Singh, Lim Kit Siang, Lim Guan Eng, Hadi Awang dan Mat Sabu akan mempengaruhi lebih dari 90% dari keputusan kerajaan. Mereka tidak ada ikatan yang jelas dari segi dasar perjuangan seperti yang ada pada Barisan Nasional. Yang jelas ialah ranting, cabang dan cawangan parti-parti dalam Pakatan Rakyat tidak bergungsi kerana barisan pimpinannya ditentukan oleh pemimpin belaka.
 
Bagaimana dengan hudud, negara Islam, Islam, Bahasa Melayu, Hak Melayu, demokrasi, LGBT, Pluralisma, Liberalisma, sikap terhadap Israel dan ancaman kepada Palestin dan lain-lain.  Apakah yang boleh dibuat oleh Dewan Ulama Pas apabila kabinet pakatan membenarkan penggunakaan Allah oleh semua ugama. Berdemonstrasi? Pemimpin pakatan lebih pakar dalam mengendalinya.
 
Sedangkan bagi rakyat di bawah kerajaan pimpinan Barisan Nasional mempunyai UMNO, MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PBB dan lain-lain dengan pemimpin dan ahli yang ramai dalam cawangan dan bahagian masing-masing. Di samping itu ada juga Majlis Perundingan Melayu, Perkasa dan lain-lain NGO yang menyokong tetapi terus mengkritik kerajaan secara lantang apabila perlu. Kita lihat bagaimana pemimpin BN yang didapati tidak berkemampuan telah berjaya diturunkan setelah mencapai kemenangan dalam Pilihanraya ke 12. Jika ahli-ahli UMNO dan NGO di semua peringkat tidak hilang taringnya selepas BN memenangi pilihanraya sudah pasti rakyat berbilang kaum akan mempunyai peranan untuk membimbing kerajaan mereka.
 
Kita lihat sahaja bagaimana Perdana Menteri Najib telah memperkenalkan berbagai program khususnya program transformasi sebagai usaha untuk memenuhi kehendak rakyat. BR1M juga adalah akibat tuntutan rakyat.  
 
Tetapi rakyat tidak mahu usaha membela Israel sementara rakyat Palestin tertindas, rakyat tidak mahu kebebasan seks LGBT, rakyat tidak mahu Pluralisma agama yang menyamakan Islam dengan semua ugama lain, rakyat tidak mahu Liberalisma yang membolehkan saja apa yang dituntut oleh nafsu, rakyat tidak mahu hanya kebajikan tetapi ulama yang ikhlas dengan perjuangan, rakyat tidak mahukan huru-hara jika jurang perbezaan ekonomi antara kaum melebar tanpa sebarang program yang memberi harapan ke arah perbezaan yang lebih adil.
 
DIPECAT OLEH
PERDANA MENTERI YANG PALING MENGASIHINYA
 
Anwar Ibrahim tidak keluar dari UMNO; tetapi ianya dipecat oleh Perdana Menteri dari menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri kerana moralnya, dan pemecatan ini ialah dalam bidang kuasa Perdana Menteri sepertimana Tengku Abdul Rahman memecat menterinya yang popular Abdul Aziz Ishak kerana pendekatannya terhadap industri baja yang tidak disetujui oleh Perdana Menteri di waktu itu. Waktu dipecat dari Kabinet Anwar masih menjadi ahli UMNO. Tetapi, apabila beliau berusaha menggerakkan UMNO ke dalam masalahnya maka Majlis Tertinggi UMNO, dan bukan Perdana Menteri, telah memecat beliau setelah beliau diberi peluang membela diri dalam majlis mesyuarat. Pada waktu itu Anwar tidak dipenjarakan. Hanya setelah berlaku huru-hara jalanan maka barulah Anwar ditangkap dan dipenjarakan di bawah ISA. Beliau tidak didakwa di mahkamah untuk menjaga maruahnya dan kesilapannya tidak menjadi pengetahuan umum. Dakwaan di mahkamah hanya dilakukan apabila kawannya di waktu itu, Nallakaruppan, yang juga ditahan di bawah ISA telah membuat affidavit yang mengaitkan Anwar sehingga beliau juga terpaksa dibawa ke pengadilan sebagaimana juga Nallakaruppan. Anwar bernasib baik kerana ada Karpal Singh yang pandai membelanya. Tun Daim lebih mengetahui mengenai prestasi Anwar dalam jawatan-jawatan yang dipegangnya. Yang perlu ditanya bukan prestasinya tetapi sebab dianya dipecat.
 
PILIHLAH DENGAN BIJAK
 
Rakyat Malaysia hendaklah bijak memilih. Ratusan ribu rakyat Amerika, Palestin, Iraq dan Afghanistan telah terbunuh kerana rakyat Amerika Syarikat telah salah memilih Presiden mereka. Di bawah ini diturunkan satu perikan dari website:

Kandungannya ialah sepucuk surat dari seorang bekas anggota tentera Amerika Syarikat kepada pemimpinnya, sebelum dia meninggal dunia.
 
The Last Letter - A Message to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney From a Dying Veteran
 
To: George W. Bush and Dick Cheney
 
From: Tomas Young
 
I write this letter on the 10th anniversary of the Iraq War on behalf of my fellow Iraq War veterans. I write this letter on behalf of the 4,488 soldiers and Marines who died in Iraq. I write this letter on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of veterans who have been wounded and on behalf of those whose wounds, physical and psychological, have destroyed their lives. I am one of those gravely wounded. I was paralyzed in an insurgent ambush in 2004 in Sadr City. My life is coming to an end. I am living under hospice care.
 
I write this letter on behalf of husbands and wives who have lost spouses, on behalf of children who have lost a parent, on behalf of the fathers and mothers who have lost sons and daughters and on behalf of those who care for the many thousands of my fellow veterans who have brain injuries. I write this letter on behalf of those veterans whose trauma and self-revulsion for what they have witnessed, endured and done in Iraq have led to suicide and on behalf of the active-duty soldiers and Marines who commit, on average, a suicide a day. I write this letter on behalf of the some 1 million Iraqi dead and on behalf of the countless Iraqi wounded. I write this letter on behalf of us all—the human detritus your war has left behind, those who will spend their lives in unending pain and grief.
 
I write this letter, my last letter, to you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney. I write not because I think you grasp the terrible human and moral consequences of your lies, manipulation and thirst for wealth and power. I write this letter because, before my own death, I want to make it clear that I, and hundreds of thousands of my fellow veterans, along with millions of my fellow citizens, along with hundreds of millions more in Iraq and the Middle East, know fully who you are and what you have done. You may evade justice but in our eyes you are each guilty of egregious war crimes, of plunder and, finally, of murder, including the murder of thousands of young Americans—my fellow veterans—whose future you stole.
 
Your positions of authority, your millions of dollars of personal wealth, your public relations consultants, your privilege and your power cannot mask the hollowness of your character. You sent us to fight and die in Iraq after you, Mr. Cheney, dodged the draft in Vietnam, and you, Mr. Bush, went AWOL from your National Guard unit. Your cowardice and selfishness were established decades ago. You were not willing to risk yourselves for our nation but you sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to be sacrificed in a senseless war with no more thought than it takes to put out the garbage.
 
I joined the Army two days after the 9/11 attacks. I joined the Army because our country had been attacked. I wanted to strike back at those who had killed some 3,000 of my fellow citizens. I did not join the Army to go to Iraq, a country that had no part in the September 2001 attacks and did not pose a threat to its neighbors, much less to the United States. I did not join the Army to “liberate” Iraqis or to shut down mythical weapons-of-mass-destruction facilities or to implant what you cynically called “democracy” in Baghdad and the Middle East. I did not join the Army to rebuild Iraq, which at the time you told us could be paid for by Iraq’s oil revenues. Instead, this war has cost the United States over $3 trillion. I especially did not join the Army to carry out pre-emptive war. Pre-emptive war is illegal under international law. And as a soldier in Iraq I was, I now know, abetting your idiocy and your crimes. The Iraq War is the largest strategic blunder in U.S. history. It obliterated the balance of power in the Middle East. It installed a corrupt and brutal pro-Iranian government in Baghdad, one cemented in power through the use of torture, death squads and terror. And it has left Iran as the dominant force in the region. On every level—moral, strategic, military and economic—Iraq was a failure. And it was you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, who started this war. It is you who should pay the consequences.
 
I would not be writing this letter if I had been wounded fighting in Afghanistan against those forces that carried out the attacks of 9/11. Had I been wounded there I would still be miserable because of my physical deterioration and imminent death, but I would at least have the comfort of knowing that my injuries were a consequence of my own decision to defend the country I love. I would not have to lie in my bed, my body filled with painkillers, my life ebbing away, and deal with the fact that hundreds of thousands of human beings, including children, including myself, were sacrificed by you for little more than the greed of oil companies, for your alliance with the oil sheiks in Saudi Arabia, and your insane visions of empire.
 
I have, like many other disabled veterans, suffered from the inadequate and often inept care provided by the Veterans Administration. I have, like many other disabled veterans, come to realize that our mental and physical wounds are of no interest to you, perhaps of no interest to any politician. We were used. We were betrayed. And we have been abandoned. You, Mr. Bush, make much pretense of being a Christian. But isn’t lying a sin? Isn’t murder a sin? Aren’t theft and selfish ambition sins? I am not a Christian. But I believe in the Christian ideal. I believe that what you do to the least of your brothers you finally do to yourself, to your own soul.
 
My day of reckoning is upon me. Yours will come. I hope you will be put on trial. But mostly I hope, for your sakes, that you find the moral courage to face what you have done to me and to many, many others who deserved to live. I hope that before your time on earth ends, as mine is now ending, you will find the strength of character to stand before the American public and the world, and in particular the Iraqi people, and beg for forgiveness.

INILAH YANG DIKATAKAN MENYESAL DAHULU KEDAPATAN, MENYESAL KEMUDIAN APA GUNANYA.

SESAT DI HUJUNG JALAN BALIKLAH KE PANGKAL JALAN.

PILIHLAH DENGAN BIJAK DALAM PRU 13. PILIHLAH BARISAN NASIONAL.

Malaysian PM Najib to Dissolve Parliament?


Najib on the stump
Najib on the stump
UMNO mouthpiece New Straits Times speculates it will be tomorrow
After months of dithering, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is expected to dissolve Parliament tomorrow to prepare the country for national elections, according to the party-owned New Straits Times newspaper.

The cabinet was said to be meeting late today although no reason was given. If Parliament were dissolved tomorrow, the election date would probably be before April 27, the New Straits Times speculated. Parliament must dissolve automatically on April 30 if the prime minister lets it go to the full term.

If it isn't tomorrow, however, it has to be soon. The Barisan Nasional is being pushed into national elections by the dissolution of state governments that have run their full term. Negeri Sembilan's state assembly has already been dissolved automatically and Pahang, Johor and Selangor are not far behind. If the country is to hold simultaneous elections, Najib, however reluctant, must follow suit soon.

Najib and the United Malays National Organization, the country's biggest political party, are clearly running scared, political analysts in Kuala Lumpur say. The government has been handing out money on an unprecedented scale, for instance with the announcement yesterday that 4,000 workers for the national energy company Petronas would receive RM1,000 (US$323) bonuses "for their hard work."

Raises have gone to the military, the police, the civil service, the state-owned national telecoms company Telekom Malaysia, Permodolan Nasional Bhd, the government's sovereign fund, and staffs of several statutory bodies. Money has been poured into low-cost housing and other programs that particularly benefit ethnic Malays, the UMNO base.

Although there is a statutory limit on campaigning, both the opposition and the Barisan have been in no-holds-barred campaign mode for more than a year, with both sides charging the other with a long panoply of misdeeds - enough so that most of the vote has probably solidified by now and can only be turned liquid by the application of stupendous amounts of cash, which Najib is attempting to do.

"I expect (Pakatan Rakyat, the three-party opposition coalition led by Anwar Ibrahim) to win," said one veteran independent political figure in a telephone interview. "But we have never seen money handed out like this in history. I do not know what kind of an impact it will have."' The ruling Barisan Nasional currently holds 137 of the 222 parliamentary seats facing election, while Anwar's Pakatan Rakyat holds 75. The other 10 are held by independents or splinter parties. Pakatan Rakyat continues to hold four of the five states it won in upset 2008 elections.

Under many of the traditional markers, the Barisan Nasional, which has held power since Malaysia became a nation, should be coasting home. The economy has defied global headwinds to post respectable 5.6 percent gross domestic product growth in 2012, with billions of dollars in new foreign and domestic investment pouring into the country, largely because of renewed confidence in Najib's Economic Transformation Program. The CPI remains relatively tame, at a 1.5 percent annual rise. The country is gerrymandered to the Barisan's definite advantage, taking only 50.27 percent of the vote in 2008 but winning nearly twice as many seats as the opposition.

The Barisan, however, appears almost guaranteed to lost at least 80 percent of the Chinese-majority and mixed seats, with the Malaysian Chinese Association, the second-biggest ethnic party in the Barisan, reeling from infighting and two massive scandals, one over the loss of billions of dollars in the construction of the Port Klang multimodal port facility west of Kuala Lumpur, and a second over the misappropriation of millions of dollars of a soft loan to develop a national halal cattle feedlot. The Chinese, who make up about 25 percent of the country, have also been put off by strident racism on the part of UMNO and splinter groups such as the Malay-nationalist Perkasa NGO.

On top of that, however, there is a palpable sense that UMNO is a tired, extensively corrupt political organization whose top cadres have profited from rent-seeking and sleaze, and that little of the country's riches have trickled down to the kampungs, the rural Malay villages that make up the backbone of UMNO's support. Nonetheless, Najib has been wooing them assiduously, handing out RM563 million to second-generation oil palm plantation settlers - almost all of them ethnic Malay or Indian - last November "as a promise fulfilled by the Barisan government," he said in an address in the suburban city of Shah Alam. Parti Islam se-Malaysia, the rural fundamentalist opposition party that has held sway along the upper eastern seacoast, has been attempting to make inroads into that vote.

Najib's popularity has been slipping as well, although it remains at levels most western politicians would kill for. The respected Merdeka Poll reported in February polling that his popularity had fallen from 63 to 61 percent. No new polls have been held since.

The question is what equation would allow Najib to continue in his job. His wife, Rosmah Mansor, is disliked by a large percentage of the urban population because of rumors of enormously expensive purchases of jewelry, handbags and clothing. Her former close friend, a carpet-seller and businessman named Deepak Jaikishan, has raised a furious campaign against her, alleging that she played an instrumental role in shepherding Perumal Balasubramaniam out of Malaysia in 2008 after the private detective delivered a sworn statement saying Najib had had an affair with Altantuya Shaariibuu, a Mongolian woman who was murdered in 2006 by two of Najib's bodyguards. Deepak later alleged that he had participated in RM4 billion worth of business dealings with her.

Last week, the former Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, shocked party stalwarts by saying Najib might be forced to step down if UMNO does badly. Najib, according to the common wisdom, must do better than the 76 seats won for UMNO by his lackluster predecessor, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, and must do better than the 137 the Barisan now holds in the Dewan Rakyat, or Parliament. Party insiders say Najib has been hearing footsteps for months from his vice premier, Muhyiddin Yassin, who is believed to be aligned with Mahathir.

The big question, political analysts say, is which way the 3 million new voters who have registered since the 2008 election, many of whom are disaffected by the continuing charges of corruption surrounding UMNO, will vote.. The conventional wisdom is that younger voters are more liberal and thus more likely to be aligned with the opposition.

Najib, however, has campaigned energetically for younger voters, seeking to act as hip as possible for a 59-year-old Oxonian economist. He has brought in the fantastically popular Korean pop star PSY for a rally in Penang and lured action movie star Jackie Chan to another event to press the flesh for Chinese voters.

Should the outcome be close, and should Najib be ousted either by the opposition or by the long knives of his own party, that raises several questions -- whether his elaborate Economic Transformation Program disappears with him. The country has long been stuck in the so-called middle-income trap, per capita incomes having fallen far behind those of neighboring Singapore. It also brings up the question whether - in the event Pakatan Rakyat were to win -- he would be indicted on charges of corruption over the purchase of billions of dollars of military hardware during his tenure as defense minister.

Prosecution of wrongdoers is mostly an alien concept, not only in Malaysia but across Southeast Asia. But Anwar, were he to actually take over as head of government, would have plenty of reason to go after him, since Najib appears to have been behind an attempt to snare Anwar on renewed charges of sexual perversion in the so-called Sodomy II trial that ended in acquittal a year ago - although government prosecutors have appealed that decision.

There is also the question of whether, if the election is close, there will be violence. The year-long election campaign has been marred with extremely harsh rhetoric and occasional flareups, particularly at the hands of the Malay supremacist organization Perkasa and its firebrand leader, Ibrahim Ali. Political analysts regularly invoke the events of July 1969, the closest election in Malaysian history, which resulted in race riots that took the lives of hundreds on both sides.

But, according to Zaid Ibrahim, the former Law Minister for UMNO and later a leader of Pakatan Rakayat before he fell out with Anwar, that was a confrontation between Chinese and Malays. Now there is a sizeable contingent of ethnic Malays in the opposition, first in PAS, and second in Anwar's own Parti Keadilan Rakyat, which is made up mostly of urban, moderate middle-class Malays. If he were to pull off a win, it would be because ethnic Malays have turned against UMNO in great numbers.

Parliament to be dissolved tomorrow?

The New Straits Times

STRONG HINT: Ministers told to prepare for photo session before Cabinet meeting

KUALA LUMPUR: Parliament is expected to be dissolved as early as tomorrow after the cabinet meeting in Putrajaya, paving the way for the 13th general election.Speculation is mounting following the distribution of letters by the Prime Minister's Office, requesting all cabinet ministers to attend the meeting in a dark lounge suit and red tie for a photography session.

If Parliament is dissolved tomorrow, nomination of candidates is likely to be held later next week, while polling day will fall on April 27 at the latest.

According to practice, the cabinet ministers will have a photo session with the prime minister and his deputy at the final meeting of the cabinet, followed by an announcement on the dissolution of parliament afterwards.

It is understood that the photo session would be done before tomorrow's cabinet meeting and Datuk Seri Najib Razak would subsequently hold a press conference to announce the dissolution of parliament.

Tradition dictates that the prime minister will first meet the Yang di-Pertuan Agong before the cabinet meeting to seek his consent to dissolve Parliament.

Several ministers contacted confirmed that they have received the letters, and did not discount the possibility that Najib would announce Parliament's dissolution after the meeting.

"I have received the letter. This could well be the final cabinet meeting for this term, as according to tradition, Parliament is dissolved after that," said one minister.

If parliament is dissolved tomorrow, it would mark a full four years to the date Najib first helmed the country after he was appointed as Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's successor in 2009.

The government's full five-year term will end on April 30, after which Parliament will automatically dissolve.

The Election Commission (EC) will then have 60 days to hold the election to set up a new government.

Last Thursday, the Negri Sembilan state legislative assembly was the first to automatically dissolve. It is now governed by a caretaker government.

Deputy EC chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said if Parliament is dissolved tomorrow, the EC would call for a special meeting as soon as possible to decide on basic matters such as the electoral roll, letters of appointment to election officers, as well as the dates for the nomination of candidates and polling day.

Chor Chee Heung has proven Mahathir and Daim right when they respectively condemned the present Cabinet Ministers as “half-past six” or “deadwood”

Former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad and former Finance Minister Tun Daim Zainuddin have one thing in common – they do not think very highly of the quality and calibre of the Ministers in post-Mahathir Cabinets.

Mahathir have dismissed the Cabinet as comprising “half-past six Ministers” while Daim only recently called for the removal of the “deadwood” from the Barisan Nasional’s Cabinet line-up, to which Mahathir gave “full-hearted” support, saying:

“I agree entirely. Lots of deadwood should be chopped down and thrown away and new trees grow.”

The MCA Vice President and Minister for Housing and Local Government, Datuk Chor Chee Heung came to Gelang Patah yesterday and provided ample proof that he fully deserves the contempt Mahathir and Daim reserved for the present Cabinet Ministers, dismissing them as “half-past six” and “deadwood” Ministers.

In Gelang Patah, Chor questioned my motive for contesting in Gelang Patah. He alleged that I was “hopping from one seat to another” because I was “greedy” for pensions, claiming that I would get separate pension entitlements if I moved from constituency to constituency.

I have been an MP for four states, namely Malacca, Selangor, Penang, Perak and am going to contest in Johore in Gelang Patah in the 13GE. Does this mean that I would be entitled to five pensions if I win in Gelang Patah?

I am astonished by Chor’s claim, as I never knew that I would be entitled to more than one parliamentary pension if I moved from one constituency to another.

This is of couse totally baseless and an entire concoction of Chor ignorance and folly.

Let me tell Chor that a Member of Parliament is only entitled to one parliamentary pension regardless of the number of constituencies he had represented in his life.

There is no such law which provides that an MP can get multiple pensions based on his moving from “constituency to constituency”.

No wonder MCA Ministers and Deputy Ministers command so little respect not only from Pakatan Rakyat ranks but also from UMNO and BN circles as well as in the civil service – when MCA Ministers could utter such garbage as Chor did in Gelang Patah yesterday.

The Malaysian Cabinet with so many “half-past six” and “deadwood” Ministers (to quote Mahathir and Daim) is a national and international disgrace to Malaysia, and is one important reason why there must be a change of tenant in Putrajaya in the 13GE, so that the country can not only get a new Federal Government, a new Prime Minister but also a new Cabinet of high-calibre, dedicated and honest Ministers.

Recently the MCA had escalated their vicious and baseless propaganda attacks against the DAP but the ferocity of these MCA assaults cannot hide the fact that the MCA is in the most parlous state in the party’s 64-year history, as never before in MCA history has a MCA President lost the right to decide whether he himself could contest in a general election.

At present, the MCA President must depend on the approval of the UMNO President whether he could contest as a BN candidate in the 13th general elections.

When the MCA President has to depend on the approval of the UMNO President on whether he could be allowed to be a BN candidate in the forthcoming general elections, who believes that the MCA Presicent and the MCA leadership under him are capable of being independent and courageous political leaders who will not compromise their principles and the interests of the public because they are beholden to UMNO pressures or demands?

(Speech from Lim Kit Siang when visiting Taman Bukit Indah, Pengkalan Rinting on Tuesday, April 2, 2013 at 10 am)