DAP Kulasegaran’s Tamil School Stunt

“All those friends of mine who went to a Tamil school are now either lorry drivers, labourers or in prison” Kulasegaran

'There are few opportunities for anyone who goes to Tamil school. Generally speaking, these schools produce labourers'  The Traveler, Sunday, October 16, 2011 Bayan Baru MP Zahrain Mohamed Hashim is a fading frog in politics. Many individuals and Tamil organizations have jumped to condemn his call for closing Tamil Schools in the country. By doing that, instead of ignoring him, these people gave more publicity to that frog. Now, DAP Kulsegaran has jumped into the fray. According to Makkal Osai Tamil daily, Kulasegaran warned that legal action will be taken if Zahrain failed to apologize for his “irresponsible, offensive and unacceptable” remarks. This is laughable. The Ipoh Barat MP should be the last person to defend Tamil Schools. “All those friends of mine who went to a Tamil school are now either lorry drivers, labourers or in prison”, said Kulasegaran before becoming Ipoh Barat MP on Democratic Action Party ticket. Did Kulasegaran ever apologize for his “irresponsible, offensive and unacceptable” remark uttered before becoming MP? Kulasegaran is singing a different tune to suit his political career. Now he says Chinese and Tamil school students have become ministers, according to the same daily. Be a gentlemen Kulasegaran! Before warning a frog to apologize, you as a responsible MP first apologize to the Indian community for your irresponsible, offensive and unacceptable remark. *********** Media statement by M.Kula Segaran in Ipoh on Sunday, 16th October 2011: Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zharain must withdraw and apologise over his seditious remarks or face punishment by law On Tuesday October 12, Bayan Baru MP DatuK Seri Zharain Mohamed Hashim, while taking part in the 2012 Budget parliamentary debate, had made the offensive remarks about the closure of Tamil, Chinese and agama schools. An extract of the Hansard (verbatim recording of parliamentary debates) is as follows;- [Tuan Yang di-Pertua mempengerusikan Mesyuarat] 2.32 ptg. Tuan Yang di-Pertua: Sila, Yang Berhormat Bayan Baru. Dato' Seri Zahrain Mohamed Hashim [Bayan Baru]: Terima kasih Tuan Yang di-Pertua. Sebelum saya meneruskan ucapan, saya ingin menjawab apa yang telah dibawa oleh Yang Berhormat Kulim Bandar Baharu tadi sebelum saya akhir ucapan sebelah pagi. Isu sekolah-sekolah yang kita terima dari zaman penjajah dulu. Kita sedar bahawa sekolah-sekolah sekarang ini sekolah aliran Cina, aliran Tamil, aliran agama tidak sepatutnya dijalankan lagi sebab penjajah tinggalkan kita satu sistem yang isu dia divide and rule. Dia memecahbelahkan kita. Akan tetapi, kalau kita masih hendak teruskan bermakna ia akan melahirkan mereka yang pemikiran ekstremis. Saya sebut Namewee tadi sebagai satu contoh. Akan tetapi kita boleh melihat bahawa ekstremis-ekstremis ini masih wujud. Yang pergi ke sekolah aliran Cina tidak memahami kebudayaan Melayu, kebudayaan India begitu juga yang aliran India dan aliran agama pun sama. Zharain's remarks that the Tamil, Chinese and religious schools are dividing the people and producing extremists are totally without basis, offensive and unacceptable. By calling for the closure of Tamil, Chinese and religious schools, he has in fact committed the offence of sedition and can be prosecuted in court if a police report is lodged against him. When commenting on Jerlun MP Datulk Mukriz's call for the closure of the vernacular schools in 2010, DAP parliamentary leader, Sdr Lim Kit Siang had said the following: - "The Constitution Amendment 1971 entrenching four sensitive issues and imposing an absolute prohibition from any questioning, even removing the parliamentary immunity in parliamentary debates, by classifying them as sedition offences under Section 3(f) of the Sedition Act, does not allow anyone to propose the closure of Chinese and Tamil primary schools so long as Article 10(4) on the entrenchment of the sensitive issues is not repealed. If Mukhriz wants to be able to publicly pursue his proposal of a single education system resulting in the closure of Chinese and Tamil primary schools, he must get the Constitutional provision on the four entrenched sensitive issues amended and repealed." He further said:- "The law is very clear as there had been decided cases - Melan Abdullah v Public Prosecutor (1971) where Utusan Malaysia was found guilty of the sedition offence for its editorial subheading, "Hapuskan Sekolah Beraliran Tamil atau China di-Negeri ini" and Mark Koding v. Public Prosecutor where the Sabah Member of Parliament was found guilty of sedition when he spoke in Parliament in October 1978 calling for the closure of Chinese and Tamil primary schools." Zharain has not only made irresponsible, offensive and unacceptable remarks, he has committed sedition and can be punished by law. Zharain must therefore withdraw and apologise for his remarks, failing which he must be prepared to be punished by law.