PAS not signing SD supporting Azizah

President Jimmy Carter to be keynote speaker at Muslim convention in Detroit

The Islamic Society of North America or ISNA, the nation's largest Muslim group, will hold its 51st annual convention in Detroit's Cobo Center Friday through Sept. 1, and will feature former President Jimmy Carter as the keynote speaker. President Carter will talk on the subject of his latest book, A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power, at a luncheon Aug. 30.

That night, at a session called “Generations Rise: Elevating Muslim-American Culture” -- the same title as the entire conference theme — the outgoing president of ISNA, Imam Mohamed Magid, and four other Muslim speakers will offer ideas for Muslim-American advancement over the next five years. A “secret special guest” is also on the bill.

The convention‘‍s opening session Friday will include words from Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and Bishop Elizabeth Eaton, the national leader of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim member of Congress, will also be speaking Saturday.

There will be many other sessions over the four days, including workshops on a variety of topics including religion with both Muslim and interfaith approaches, education, and culture. An Islamic Film Festival and a competition for those who recite the Qur‘‍an will be held, and there will be a bazaar/trade show with more than 400 vendors.

At the same time and location as the conference, the Islamic Medical Association of North America, Muslim Students Association, and Muslim Youth of North America will have their annual gatherings.

This is the first time the organization will will hold its convention in Detroit. Its headquarters is in Plainfield, Ind, near Indianapolis.

Source: http://www.toledoblade.com

Video shows young boy pledging allegiance to ISIS

A video of a young boy pledging allegiance to its self-proclaimed “Islamic State” is circulating on social media.

The boy is seen in the video reciting a pledge of allegiance to ISIS.

The boy seemed to utter the statements with difficulty, forcing the man who dictated the allegiance to repeat himself more than once.

As soon as the boy finishes the pledge, a voice heard from behind the camera asks the boy how he feels about joining ISIS.

The video ends as the camera holder tells the boy: “Are you now ready to die in the way of Allah?”

The boy replies: “Yes, God willing.”

Al Arabiya News cannot independently verify the location of the video shoot.

U.N. accuses Islamic State of mass killings

By Stephanie Nebehay and Ahmed Rasheed

GENEVA/BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The United Nations on Monday condemned "appalling, widespread" crimes by Islamic State forces in Iraq, including mass executions of prisoners that could amount to war crimes.

U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay condemned "grave, horrific human rights violations" being committed by Islamic State, a Sunni Muslim group which has seized large areas of Iraq and Syria to the alarm of the Baghdad government and its allies in the West.

Up to 670 prisoners from Badush prison in the city of Mosul were killed by Islamic State on June 10, Pillay said in a statement quoting survivors and witnesses to the "massacre" as telling U.N. human rights investigators.

"Such cold-blooded, systematic and intentional killings of civilians, after singling them out for their religious affiliation, may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity," Pillay said.

Islamic State (ISIL) loaded 1,000 to 1,500 prisoners from the jail on to trucks and took them for screening, Pillay said. Sunni inmates were then separated and removed.

"ISIL gunmen then yelled insults at the remaining prisoners, lined them up in four rows, ordered them to kneel and opened fire," she said.

AIR POWER

Islamic State fighters have made gains against Kurdish forces in the north in recent weeks, seizing towns, oilfields and Iraq's largest dam. Backed by U.S. air power, Kurdish forces later took back control of the Mosul dam.

An Islamic State video last week depicting the beheading of American journalist James Foley prompted revulsion in the West and calls for tougher action against the jihadists, including taking the fight to them in Syria as well as Iraq.

Some experts have suggested that attacking Islamic State in Syria should involve coming to some sort of arrangement with the government of President Bashar al-Assad, seen in the West as a pariah since an uprising against him began three years ago.

Syria said it would cooperate in any international efforts to fight Islamic State in the country, after Washington signaled it was considering extending the battle against the militants into Syrian territory.

Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem presented his country as a vital partner in the war against Islamic State.

"Syria, geographically and operationally, is the center of the international coalition to fight Islamic State," Moualem said in a televised news conference. "States must come to it if they are serious in combating terrorism," he added.

Asked about the prospect of U.S. air strikes against Islamic State in Syria, Moualem said his government was ready to cooperate with any country fighting militants. But air raids without Damascus's approval would be seen as hostile acts.

While the White House indicated last week that it was considering taking on Islamic State in Syria, Washington has also supported the insurgency against Assad and there has been no sign of any shift in U.S. policy toward him.

GERMANY KEEPS DISTANCE

Germany said on Monday it has had no diplomatic contacts with the Assad government and no plans to rekindle ties because of the threat posed by Islamic State.

The statement by a German foreign ministry spokesman followed a report in The Independent, a British newspaper, which said the United States had shared intelligence with Syria via Germany's BND intelligence service.

"The regime of President Assad has committed unbelievable injustice in every form during the civil war that has been raging for 3-1/2 years. Nearly 200,000 people have died," the spokesman, Martin Schaefer, told a news conference.

"To be honest it is very difficult to imagine that all this can be ignored in the name of Realpolitik," he said.

Russia, Syria's major ally, urged Western and Arab governments to overcome their distaste for Assad and engage with him to fight Islamic State insurgents. "I think Western politicians are already realizing the growing and fast-spreading threat of terrorism," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.

The growing perception in the West and in Baghdad that Islamic State represents a threat to the region and beyond has shaken old alliances and enmities.

While there have been suggestions that the West may find itself dealing with Assad, old enemies Iran and Saudi Arabia have united in welcoming this month's appointment of incoming Shi'ite Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi in Iraq.

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian left for Riyadh on Monday, the state news agency IRNA reported. This would mark the first visit to Saudi Arabia by a senior government official since President Hassan Rouhani was elected in 2013, promising to try to improve Tehran's relations in the region and with the West.

Shi'ite Muslim Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia are enmeshed in a struggle for influence in the Middle East and back opposing sides in conflicts and political disputes in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Bahrain and Yemen.

IRNA said Abdollahian was due to meet Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al Faisal. Riyadh officials were not available to comment, but Saudi-owned satellite news channel al-Arabiya said the Iranian minister would arrive on Tuesday for talks.

The visit follows talks in Baghdad on Sunday between Abadi and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who reaffirmed Tehran's support for Iraq's territorial unity and its fight against militants.

Abadi said on Monday that talks on forming a new government were constructive and predicted a "clear vision" on a unified administration would emerge within the next two days, state television reported.

Abadi is tasked with forming a power-sharing government that can tackle deepening sectarian violence and counter Islamic State.

In Baghdad, a suicide bomb attack in a Shi'ite mosque on Monday killed at least nine people and wounded 21, police and medical sources said.

Islamic State claimed responsibility for the bombing, saying in a statement that it was to avenge an attack on Friday when Shi'ite militiamen opened fire in a Sunni mosque in Diyala province north of Baghdad on Friday, killing 68 people.

Later on Monday, two car bombs killed at least 11 people and wounded 25 in a mainly Shi'ite district of Baghdad, police and medical sources said. One exploded in a busy street and another at a restaurant in the Utaifiya district in the west-central area of the capital.

(Additional reporting by Michael Georgy and Kareem Raheem in Baghdad, Mariam Karouny in Beirut, Katya Golubkova in Moscow, Noah Barkin in Berlin, Michelle Moghtader in Dubia and Angus McDowall in Riyadh; Writing by Giles Elgood; Editing by David Stamp and Jonathan Oatis)

Thousands to lose jobs in MAS restructuring

About a quarter of Malaysia Airlines' 20,000 employees are likely to lose their jobs under a restructuring plan for the loss-making airline hit by two separate jet disasters this year, a source with direct knowledge of the matter said.

The restructuring plan, due to be unveiled later this week, will include route cuts, as well as the loss of up to 5,000-6,000 jobs, according to the source, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The carrier's majority owner, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, is expected to announce the plan to restructure the firm as early as August 28. Khazanah, which owns 69.37% of the airline, formally known as Malaysian Airline System Bhd (MAS), said earlier this month it is taking MAS private in a RM1.37 billion deal.

MAS is due to announce second-quarter results on August 28 that are expected to show losses expanding. MAS has been struggling with a slump in business since the unexplained disappearance of Flight MH370 in March tipped the airline into its worst quarterly performance in two years in January-March.

Its problems deepened on July 17 when its Flight MH17 was shot down over Ukraine, killing all 298 people on board. The airline is now set to post one of its weakest performance in the April-June quarter, hit by due to cancelled bookings, weak passenger yields and high overheads, according to analysts.

The same source told Reuters in July that Khazanah planned to de-list the airline, which has recorded a net loss for the past three years, and announce the restructuring plan as early as the end of August.

A Khazanah spokesperson said it does not comment on speculation.

Prime Minister Najib Razak, who is chairman of Khazanah, still has to sign off on a restructuring plan for the carrier that is politically sensitive.

While 5,000-6,000 job losses would signal a drastic downsizing of the firm, analysts have said many staff could be offered jobs at other government-run firms to soften the blow to them and their families. About 13,000 MAS workers are unionized, belonging to the MAS Employees Union.

The airline and its key stakeholders are in talks with banks for an overhaul that could include the partial sale of its engineering unit and an upgrade of its ageing fleet, sources involved in the discussions have told Reuters.

The plan is also expected to bring in a new chief executive and replace other senior executives.

Shares of MAS ended unchanged at 25.5 sen on Monday. The stock has dropped 17.7% year to date, compared with a 0.2% rise in the benchmark index. – Reuters, August 25, 2014.

Losing the best people in PKR - Malaysiakini

 

COMMENT If Abdul Khalid Ibrahim is a good man, why has there not been a single leader in his party who has stood up for him?

This is a reasonable question, given that in these last few months, literally not a single PKR top leader has come out to say: I support Khalid.

There are two very obvious potential scenarios that explain this state of affairs.

The first, propagated by the likes of Rafizi Ramli (left), is that Khalid is in fact corrupt, and all PKR leaders realise this truth.

If this is true, we would be hard pressed to explain why Khalid did not take what were literally hundreds of opportunities to abuse his position of power and enrich himself in his six years as menteri besar.

If anyone thinks it is difficult to make five or ten-fold of RM 70 million within six years as menteri besar of the richest state in Malaysia, one only need ask Dr Khir Toyo for some pointers.

The second explanation as to why Khalid has no political allies within PKR is simply because there is no ‘benefit’ or ‘reward’ in supporting Khalid.

No contracts for backing Khalid

You could suck up to Khalid from the rising of the sun, to the going down of the same, and not only will you not be rewarded with positions or contracts, you are likely to end up in his bad books.

This is the exact opposite of the spirit of feudalism that it is increasingly clear pervades PKR.

Politicians have prevailed on Khalid again and again to loosen Selangor’s purse strings, and to oil the wheels of Pakatan Rakyat’s political machinery. Khalid has again and again said no, this money belongs to the people of Selangor, not to any political interests.

For a while, some of the slightly better politicians praised Khalid for taking this stance. However, a much bigger group started saying: “Very action lah! Think you’ll be there forever? Let’s just see how long you can stay in power like that.”

It turns out the latter group has long overpowered the few in the former.

Integrity deficit in PKR leadership

If I am correct in thinking of Khalid as a man of integrity, then you can imagine my sad disappointment at how so many people in the party I have known personally for such a long time abandoned him to the wolves.

Not a single one of his former supporters, or those who would sing his praises, stood by him when push came to shove.

From the perspective of democratic representation, we note also that despite over a third of PKR’s members voting for Khalid in the second to last vote count, not a single leader has taken up his cause.

Again, his detractors will say the fault for this lies with Khalid himself, but for whatever little my opinion is worth, I think this reveals more about those who did not stand up for Khalid than it does about Khalid himself.

Does politics invariably corrupt?

There are some people who feel that politics invariably corrupts. Being allergic to cynicism, I have never chosen to agree with the ‘invariably’ part of that sentence, but at this point I am certainly comfortable with replacing it with ‘often’ or even ‘almost always’.

Malaysian politics feels like acid that eats away at personal integrity. PKR used to be home to so many individuals I looked up to - individuals of integrity that I felt fought bravely and intelligently for Malaysians, and for a Malaysia free from corruption.

Now, it feels like never-ending shades of grey have eliminated even the most basic sense of black and white in these same individuals. The Selangor crisis has clearly smashed what little was left of PKR’s moral compass, causing its ship to drift well into Barisan Nasional’s waters of corruption and self-centered politics.

The situation seems no better with DAP and the Erdogan faction of PAS. If my evaluation of the entire Kajang Move is correct, then they are as complicit and responsible as anyone in PKR.

Khalid losing his position as menteri besar is probably not the worst thing to emerge from this crisis. The worst is that in its pursuit of misguided objectives, PKR and Pakatan have lost their best, strongest feature - the integrity of their leaders.

‘Friend and family member’

Some will cry realpolitik and make accusations of both naivette as well as a blind obsession with Khalid. I do not begrudge them their view. We must all reflect on our positions and then live with them.

I joined PKR in 2007, just before the Ijok by-election that Khalid lost. PKR was a one seat party then, with Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail standing alone in a Parliament dominated by dark blue.

I left the party in January 2014. This time, it is now Khalid who is alone. I am proud to have believed in the underdog in 2007, and no less proud to do the same in 2014.

Anwar Ibrahim’s exhortation not to resort to personal attacks against his ‘friend and family member’ Khalid was not wrong, but one cannot help but feel that it rings hollow, given how the vicious campaign against Khalid would have been impossible without Anwar’s go ahead.

Broken bonds

Nurul Izzah Anwar made one of her first public comments about the menteri besar issue, throwing her support behind her mother Wan Azizah, quoting Wan Azizah’s strength during Anwar’s imprisonment as qualification for the menteri besar post.

I cannot help but recall another story Nurul Izzah used to tell. I heard it once in person at a Selangor buka puasa event some years ago, and I believe it is a story she often used to tell at events with Khalid.

Nurul Izzah spoke of how alone Anwar was, imprisoned in Sungai Buloh, with all his former friends and allies having completely abandoned him. No one who was part of the establishment would dare to visit him in prison for fear of the taint it would bring onto themselves.

No one but Khalid.

I remember Nurul Izzah describing with great feeling and eloquence how, despite having everything to lose, Khalid stuck to his principles, and stood by Anwar and his family in their darkest hour.

Fifteen years later, Khalid is still sticking to his principles. This time, though, he appears to be standing alone.

---

NATHANIEL TAN thanks everyone who has ever stood by him, including Anwar Ibrahim. He tweets @NatAsasi.

What are the criteria for male MBs?

 

Najib Abdul Razak’s latest slogan ‘Endless Possibilities’ only applies to men. In Najib’s Malaysia, women face ‘Endless Objections’. The latest victim is Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail. Her plan to become the first woman menteri besar for Selangor is being thwarted by Umno Baru and the critics in her own coalition.

In patriarchal Malaysia, women must prove themselves more than most men, and obstacles are deliberately put in their way. Many women know that if they put their minds to it, they can achieve whatever they desire. Have the people who question Wan Azizah’s suitability, applied the same rigorous standards to MBs in other states? Unsurprisingly, MBs in the opposition-held states of Selangor, and Penang are subjected to intense scrutiny.

Did anyone ask if the Kelantan MB possessed the necessary experience? Ahmad Yaakob, the Syariah graduate from Al-Azhar University in Egypt and former teacher did not have a rough ride when he was chosen as MB for Kelantan.

Similarly, his predecessor, ‘Tok Guru’, who is much respected and admired, even by non-Muslims, and has been credited for PAS’ increased popularity among non-Muslims,  eased effortlessly into the role of MB.

The former MB of Terengganu, Ahmad Said, who many will remember as the explorer who met the penguins in Antarctica, and whose temper tantrums, just before his daughter’s wedding caught Najib’s attention, was not the first choice for MB, in 2008. In the Terengganu constitutional crisis, Ahmad was alleged to be the sultan’s favourite, despite Ahmad’s unpopularity within Umno Baru.

Did anyone question if Mukhriz Mahathir had the necessary experience to be MB? Sometimes, one’s political pedigree is enough to silence one’s detractors.

In 2010, Perak’s BN senior executive councillor Hamidah Osman (right) was rumoured to be Najib’s preferred choice for MB, because of her alleged role in persuading three Pakatan assemblypersons to leap frog to ‘independence’, thus causing the collapse of Pakatan’s 10-month government of Perak.

If Najib had been successful in making Hamidah the MB of Perak, he would have been lauded for being progressive. What a wasted opportunity! Instead, Najib listened to the chauvinists in Umno Baru and chose Zambry Abdul Kadir instead.

In a face-saving gesture, Hamidah betrayed every woman in Malaysia, when she said that a female politician could become a minister, but not an MB. “As menteri besar, one has to meet the Tuanku, where protocol is involved, and one has to meet religious officers, and in such situations it is not possible for a woman to become the head of a state government.”

This mantra is continually applied to women, who might accompany the sultan. Recently, Umno Baru lawyer Mohd Hafarizam Harun mentioned a woman’s unsuitability to be the MB, because her menstruation would be an “obstacle for her, to accompany the sultan at religious functions”.

No mention of women being ineligible

The news article on Hafarizam also said that in the Selangor constitution, an MB must be “a member of the Malay race and profess the Muslim religion”. There was no mention of women being ineligible.

Dr Shamrahayu Abdul Aziz (right), a Universiti Islam Antarabangsa (UIA) Malaysia lecturer agreed that it was possible for a woman to be MB. “There is no specification in the state laws that does not allow for a woman to be the menteri besar. The main requirements are for the candidate to be Muslim and Malay”.

Conscious of her Umno Baru minders, she cautiously said, “But we also have to take into account sensitivities and taboos in society, as well as whether we are ready for a female menteri besar”.

Why is Shamrahayu afraid of advancing the progress of other women? Is she aware that at one time, women had great difficulty getting an education, let along becoming lecturers?

Najib became Malaysia’s youngest MB when he was 29, in 1982. Did anyone question his suitability as MB, for Pahang? Did the sympathy vote, after the death of his father, a few years earlier, which made him suitable?

Last year, Najib took over from Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, as the Women, Family and Community Development Minister. Did anyone broach the subject of his ability to hold three portfolios - prime minister, finance minister and also women minister? Was he paid three salaries? How did other women gauge his effectiveness as a minister in charge of women’s affairs?

Najib cares more about his public image. He craves status and power. Over the years, many women in employment have given up lucrative careers, because of expensive child care. Single mothers are neglected. The syariah laws do not protect women. Child marriages destroy the lives of many young girls. Sports personalities are let off when they commit statutory rape.

How did Najib transform the lives of women during his tenure as the Women Minister? He could not fill the quota for women in government. He lacked the courage and conviction to push through policies, which would help Malaysian women. The bigger disappointment is that few women complained about him being an ineffective minister for women’s affairs.

Sometimes, those who blight the hopes of Malaysian women are other women. Wan Azizah is being savaged for wanting to become MB, not because of her education, her achievements as a doctor, her knowledge of the struggles as a wife, working mother and grandmother, but because she is Anwar Ibrahim’s wife.

By the time Wan Azizah takes her place as MB, she will be battle-hardened. Being a good MB is not gender-specific. It is about leadership skills and the passion to engage with Malaysians, for one common purpose.

Another fear of Umno Baru and conservative Malays is that once a woman becomes an MB, the rakyat will also accept the possibility of capable non-Malays becoming MBs, and PM. That would be the death knell of parties based on race and religion, like Umno Baru and PAS.

---

MARIAM MOKHTAR is a defender of the truth, the admiral-general of the Green Bean Army and president of the Perak Liberation Organisation (PLO).

PAS MP to be charged with sedition - Malaysiakini

PAS's Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad is expected to be charged with sedition tomorrow, joining a growing list of opposition politicians facing the same.

It is believed that he will be charged over his remarks on the Selangor sultan and the Selangor Islamic Affairs Council (Mais).

"I am being called to go to court tomorrow. They are going to charge me under the Sedition Act," he told reporters in Pandamaran tonight.

The MP was informed by the police via text message earlier this evening.

"An arrest warrant will be given to me later tonight, meaning that I will be arrested if I don't show up in court tomorrow," he said.

Last month, Khalid was called in by police to give a statement after suggesting that Mais' powers be curbed.

The police had acted on a police report by NGO Jalur Tiga (Jati), which is headed by former Selangor PAS leader Hasan Ali.

He had on June 17 urged the Selangor government remove Mais' executive powers as Mais is an institution seen to be close to the Selangor sultan.

This followed Mais' refusal to allow its enforcement arm the Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais) to return copies of the bible it seized from the Bible Society Malaysia.

His remarks had prompted Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah (above) to rebuke Khalid as "insolent".

Khalid will be fourth elected representative to be charged this month alone, after PAS' Changkat Jering assemblyperson Nizar Jamaluddin (criminal defamation), PKR's Batu MP Tian Chua (insulting one's modesty) and PKR's Padang Serai MP N Surendran (sedition).

Long list of sedition cases

Others charged with sedition include DAP's Seputeh MP Teresa Kok, for her Chinese New Year video 'Onederful Malaysia' and PKR's Batu MP Tian Chua, for remarks made on the Lahad Datu incursion and general election results.

In June, DAP's Seri Delima assemblyperson RSN Rayer  (left) was informed that he will be charged with sedition for calling Umno 'celaka' (damned), but was the charge was postponed.

The late Karpal Singh, who was DAP's Bukit Gelugor MP, was convicted of sedition for observations he made as a lawyer on the Perak MB crisis.

DAP's Gelang Patah MP is under investigation for sedition over remarks made on the death of DAP political aide Teoh Beng Hock.

Last June, NGO Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma)'s president Abdullah Zaik Abdul Rahman was charged with sedition for saying that the Chinese are "intruders".

Separately, police investigated a 17-year-old for sedition, for clicking 'like' on an 'I Like Israel' Facebook page earlier this month.

In 2012, PM Najib had promised to repeal the Sedition Act.

Proposals to replace it with anti-bigotry law, as mooted by the National Unity Consultative Council, has met fierce resistance from right-wing groups who say it threatens bumiputera rights.

13 PAS reps won’t sign SD supporting Wan Azizah, says Mustafa Ali

PAS's remaining 13 Selangor ‎assemblymen will not sign the statutory declaration (SD) supporting PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail as the menteri besar, the Islamist party's secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali said today

He also refused to confirm if PAS was standing by the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) presidential council's decision to nominate Dr Wan Azizah as the sole candidate to replace Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim.

"The special central committee meeting on August 25 agreed to leave it to the wisdom of the Sultan of Selangor to determine the Selangor menteri besar‎ position," said Mustafa after attending a meeting at the PAS headquarters in Kuala Lumpur today.

When asked about the statutory declaration, already signed by DAP and PKR state assemblymen as well as two PAS representatives, ‎Mustafa said it was not an issue.

"It was mentioned (in the meeting), but it is no longer an issue.

"When you ask if we will sign, when I say it is not an issue, that means no," said Mustafa when pressed further on the matter.

Thirty of PR Selangor assemblymen had signed the SD on August 14, confirming that Dr Wan Azizah had the backing of a majority of the assemblymen.

This included PAS's Hulu Klang assemblyman Saari Sungib and Morib assemblyman Hasnul Baharuddin.

However, PAS previously held out on declaring its position, and said it was investigating its two members for defying the party's orders.

PAS finally announced on August 17 that it wanted both Dr Wan Azizah and Azmin Ali's names to be submitted to the Sultan of Selangor.

But, the PR presidential council maintained later that day that Dr Wan Azizah was the pact's sole choice, sparking unhappiness among the Islamist party's members.

Party sources told The Malaysian Insider on Saturday that PAS would decide today whether to send the sultan a letter of support for Dr Wan Azizah.

But, Mustafa told reporters today that they did not want to be specific on the matter.

"We are making an open statement. When we say that we will leave it to the sultan, it means the sultan can choose," he said.

"We are not saying anything specific... You interpret it yourself."

Earlier today, opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim confirmed that the letter nominating his wife for the position had been sent to the palace.

He added that there was also no need for the coalition parties to send individual letters of nomination to the sultan. – August 25, 2014.

Selangor Sultan is a pirate bastard, says Hu Long

I think we should get rid of the royal bastard dynasty of pirates….the descendent of a Bugis (bloody Indonesian some more) pirate who just like any gangster….
 

NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin

A number of Chinese readers whacked me last week regarding my article, DAP tells the Sultan to fuck off.

Some called me a racist and some accused me of inciting hatred against the Chinese. Somehow they thought that any article or comment critical of DAP tantamount to a slur against the Chinese even though DAP denies being a Chinese party.

One reader who posted a very nasty comment even challenged me to prove that the Chinese have been insolent towards the Sultan. Well, there are actually many such postings and comments and if you really insist on proof then I hope the following would suffice.

 

Hindraf asks Delhi to address Indian diaspora grouses

Human rights issues should be included in the Pravasi conference next year, says Waythamoorthy.

GEORGE TOWN: Hindraf has asked the Indian government to include human rights issues affecting the Indian diaspora on the agenda of next year’s annual Pravasi Bharatiya Divas conference to be held in New Delhi.

Pravasi Bharatiya Divas (Non-Resident Indian Day) is celebrated on Jan 9 every year to mark the contribution of overseas Indians to the development of India.

In a letter to the Indian Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj, Hindraf Chairman P.Waythamoorthy says it is imperative for the conference to hear out the grouses of overseas Indians with regard to human rights abuses affecting them.

He told FMT that the previous Congress government ignored Hindraf’s numerous pleas for the New Delhi administration to protect and care for overseas Indians.

But he is optimistic that the BJP government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi will pay attention to his letter.

Waythamoorthy said violations of human rights, discrimination and marginalisation of Malaysian Indians were well documented.

Similarly, he added, discrimination and marginalisation of Indians were happening in Fiji, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana and Surinam.

“Regrettably the Congress government ignored our appeals,” he said.

“Hindraf was disappointed that the issue of serious human rights violations affecting the Indian diaspora never found its way in the conference agenda.

“The current BJP government in power should give the Indian diaspora a platform to be heard at the conference.”

Since Hindraf was founded in 2003, its representatives have regularly attended the annual Pravasi Bharatiya Divas conference.

‘Islamisation’ of Christian bin, binti

NRD has lost the files of 162 cases of Sabah Christians with "bin" and "binti" in their names classified as Islam in their MyKad.

KOTA KINABALU: The National Registration Department (NRD) has been urged to act quickly to dispel the notion that Islamisation of Christian bin and binti in Sabah was an unwritten “state policy”.

Upko Vice-President Siringan Gubat said that many people in Sabah are beginning to compare it with the illegal immigrant problem in the state which still hasn’t been settled.

“Based on feedback which I personally received, people in Sabah feel that there is something very wrong with the process and registration system of the NRD,” he said, commenting on news reports about 162 cases of Sabah Christians with “bin” and “binti” in their names being classified as Islam in their MyKad.

He referred to a statement made by the president of the Borneo Evangelical Council Sabah Rev. Jerry Dusing that he had lodged a complaint with the NRD two years ago about the 162 cases in Sabah but was told no further action could be taken because all files were lost.

Siringan who is also the Minister of Resources and Information Technology and Panginatan Assemblyman, does not understand why the NRD changed a person’s religion or race based on bin and binti in their names without confirming it with the person concerned.

Bureaucratic conversions inherently invalid, null and void

Lawyers in the know say that the NRD should correct the “mistakes” based on the facts.

“Telling people with Islam MyKads to go to the Syariah Court shows insincerity and a policy of conversion through bureaucratic mechanisms,” is the consensus in the legal community.

One lawyer pointed out that these people did not recite the syahadah and neither were they born Muslims. Such bureaucratic conversions are inherently invalid, null and void, he added.

“If the NRD is not willing to admit its mistakes and make amends, this is a matter for Judicial Review, not the Syariah Court. The Syariah Court has no jurisdiction over non-Muslims.” he further said.

Can Laura be trusted?

Despite being “frozen with fear” at the sexual assault by Rosli, Instagram photos show a different side of her.

PETALING JAYA: News of Laura Bushney, 26, accusing MAS chief steward Mohd Rosli Ab Karim of sexually assaulting her on board a flight bound for Paris, has attracted mixed reactions ranging from utter disgust to deep skepticism.

While MAS has remained non-committal as investigations are still underway, the National Union of Flight Attendants Malaysia (NUFAM) are standing firmly behind 54-year-old Rosli, issuing a statement that no inappropriate acts were committed by the married steward towards Bushney.

Be that as it may, a blogger has revealed Instagram shots Bushney took of herself where she appears topless in various poses, thereby calling into question her character and her credibility.

Screen shots of the sexually explicit pictures are posted on the blogger’s site, although all the original pictures have been pulled down from her Instagram account now.

Other criticism hurled at Bushney is her apparent inability to stop Rosli from sexually assaulting her yet having the presence of mind to record the incident using a phone hidden under the blanket.

She is also heard whispering, “He’s massaging my legs. I’m so scared I just want to get off the plane.”

Throughout her ordeal, Bushney made not one but two phone recordings, the second being when she lashed out at him saying, “I don’t want to see you, go away, you give me the creeps, you dirty old man.”

With recordings of Rosli clearly asking Bushney for forgiveness, the evidence does seem to show him in bad light as do the topless pictures of Bushney herself.

How this will pan out is anybody’s guess.

Dr M, I respect you but you are OUTDATED

I was disappointed to read about Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s criticism of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak’s leadership.

Dr Mahathir is entitled to express his views, but contrary to his argument, such a move only weakens Umno and Barisan Nasional.

I have tremendous respect for the former prime minister though I may not agree with all the decisions made during his 22 years in office.

Similarly, I have tremendous respect for Datuk Seri Najib as well.

As rightfully pointed out by Home Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, every leader has his or her era.

As also stated by Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, Dr Mahathir’s era was before the information explosion – there was no Facebook, blogs, Twitter and smartphones.

During Dr Mahathir’s era, the opposition was also small in number and their voices rarely heard, with their views not appearing in the mainstream media.

And so it was easier for Dr Mahathir to govern this country.

But it is a different ball game now: information travels at lightning speed, people are more informed and voters demand that their government delivers the goods. The opposition has a sizeable presence and even controls several states.

I dare say that even a leader of Dr Mahathir’s calibre would find it a difficult task to administer the state under these circumstances.

And so he must understand that times have changed, and BN cannot hold on to the old order any longer. We must move forward or be left behind.

As for repealing the Internal Security and Emergency Ordinance, I believe the prime minister has taken a step in the right direction in further democratising this nation.

In the past, we often heard of how the ISA was abused to silent dissenters and incarcerate activists and opposition politicians, therefore running astray of its original aim of safeguarding national security.

I disagree with Dr Mahathir that Najib is “not brave”. Jailing political opponents and those with different views is not a sign of courage. Repealing the ISA is.

I also find it disappointing that Dr Mahathir chose to criticise the widening gap between the races and people of different faiths under Najib’s administration when the former PM is himself the patron of Perkasa, which seems bent on tearing this nation apart.

As for the Malaysian Indian community, I wish to point out that there has been much improvement since Najib took over: the granting of identity cards, the RM540 million for Tamil schools and others. He also set up the Cabinet Committee on Indian Affairs, which he personally chairs.

Granted, there is still much to do, but the fact is: we now have a prime minister who is willing to listen and act.

So my request to Dr Mahathir and his supporters is this: with all due respect sir, if you are not part of the solution, please don’t be a part of the problem.

I say this not because I do not love my leaders, both past and present. I say this because I love my country and BN more.

Vell Paari is an MIC member and the son of MIC former president S Samy Vellu. This story was previously published under the title 'Disappointed with Dr M’s criticism.

Source: http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/

Malaysia's Anwar dismisses offers of exile abroad

Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim has rejected offers of asylum abroad ahead of a final appeal in October on a sodomy conviction that could see him jailed, a political aide said Monday (Aug 25).

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim has rejected offers of asylum abroad ahead of a final appeal in October on a sodomy conviction that could see him jailed, a political aide said Monday (Aug 25).

Anwar was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison in March on charges he sodomised a young former male aide, but is free pending a final appeal set for October 28-29. Anwar, 67, has dismissed the case as fabricated by the government to ruin his political career.

The political aide, who asked not to be named, declined further comment but said that a media report Monday on the asylum offers was correct.

The Star newspaper quoted Anwar saying he had received several offers by "foreign leaders" to go overseas but would not accept them. "I met up with a few foreign leaders who advised me to go overseas to escape a possible prison sentence. At my age, they say they cannot imagine seeing me behind bars," Anwar was quoted as saying. The story did not specify which countries Anwar was speaking of.

Sodomy is punishable by up to 20 years' jail in the Muslim-majority nation. The accusation surfaced shortly after Anwar led a three-party alliance to unprecedented electoral gains in 2008. A lower court acquitted Anwar in 2012, but an appeals court controversially overturned that verdict in March.

Anwar, a former top leader in Malaysia's ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), had earlier spent six years in jail on separate sodomy and corruption charges after a power struggle in the late 1990s that saw him expelled from the party. The charges triggered massive protests against the UMNO-led regime. UMNO has governed since independence in 1957, but has seen its support slump over corruption, authoritarian rule and divisive racial policies.

After his release, Anwar joined the fractious opposition, leading it to unprecedented electoral gains.

- AFP/ac

Source:  http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-s-anwar/1328684.html

In the battle for Umno’s soul, money talks louder, not Dr M

One day soon, it will be remembered that the great Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad – the slayer of deputy prime ministers and a prime minister – was finally defeated not by an individual but by RM.

Ringgit Malaysia.

The former prime minister's biggest miscalculation in withdrawing his support for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was in believing that Umno members are followers of men or ideals. Or that they are even concerned about the downward spiral of Malaysia.

They are not. And have not been for decades.

They owe their allegiance only to money and wealth. More so these days when every problem or disillusionment can be fixed with either a contract, project, concession or cash handout.

Or where good publicity and support in blogosphere can be obtained by a handsome monthly stipend paid out to bloggers by businessmen close to Putrajaya.

To be fair, Dr Mahathir cannot claim ignorance of this cancer that has all but devoured the soul of Umno.

He acknowledged the onset of this disease during his years as PM and his privatisation policies even enabled the rise of the culture of easy money.

But the Dr Mahathir who withdrew the support for Najib last week does not understand that the money-grabbing dynamics at play is hundred fold more today than in mid-2006, when he last launched a pre-emptive strike against a sitting PM.

Today, there is a sense within Umno that every passing day brings them nearer to losing power. And, therefore, for many of the party's leaders what is most important is securing economic security for themselves, siblings, children and other nominees.

Just a few days ago, government officials were given instructions to commence direct negotiations with a company where a key director is the son of an Umno power broker.

Why would this Umno leader want to join the Dr Mahathir camp and criticise Najib? How does upsetting the status quo become an advantage?

It is noticeable that even usually vociferous Malay leaders of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have been indifferent to Dr Mahathir's claim that Najib's policies are leading Malaysia down a path of economic ruin and the unravelling of social cohesion.

These NGOs are recipients of the level of funding from either the government or government-friendly businessmen not seen before.

So for them, concerns about race relations or the emptying of national coffers or of Putrajaya becoming allegedly slavish to foreign governments is about as important as climate change in the North Pole.

Also working against Dr Mahathir this time around is the belief that his withdrawal of support for Najib was prompted after he was rebuffed by the PM on three issues, namely resuming the building of the crooked bridge to Singapore, payment of RM1.7 billion to Proton and stopping further 1Malaysia People’s Aid (BR1M) payments.

Not helping also is the reality that Dr Mahathir has precious few heavy hitters in his corner this time.

Even the mercurial former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin is not in the best of health.

Against this backdrop and the culture of easy money gushing through the veins of Umno politicians, it is not surprising that Putrajaya is not really perturbed about Dr Mahathir's withdrawal of support for Najib.

The Najib camp just believes that it understands the psyche of today's Umno much better than Dr Mahathir.

Movement to repeal the Sedition Act

The Star
A Humble Submission BY SYAHREDZAN JOHAN

In July 2012, the Prime Minister announced that the Government would repeal the Sedition Act 1948. The announcement was made as part of the Government's political transformation plan, which included repealing the Internal Security Act and annulling the three subsisting proclamations of emergency.

In place of the Sedition Act, the Government would table a "National Harmony Bill", seeking to "find a balance between every citizen's freedom of expression, and the need to handle the complex nature of the country's multi-racial and multi-religious society."

Earlier this year, the National Unity Consultative Council (NUCC) drafted three bills to replace the Sedition Act. The three bills were made public in order to gain feedback and consultation from stakeholders and interested parties. However, because of pressure from certain quarters, it appears that the three bills have now been shelved indefinitely.

The drafting of three bills was the Government's most serious attempt thus far to repeal the Sedition Act. Two years after the Prime Minister’s announcement, the Act is still in force.

A law that is still part of the statute books is still valid. Legally, there is nothing to stop the Government from carrying on investigations and prosecutions under the Act. But by promising to repeal the Act, the Government has tacitly acknowledged that the Act must go. There is a legitimate expectation that the Sedition Act will be on its last legs, coming ever closer to its expiry date and that there would be less reliance on the Sedition Act.

Not so. The Act it is still being applied on the citizens of this country even after the Prime Minister's announcement. It has been used on politicians, like the late Karpal Singh, whose conviction still stands as his appeal would have abated with his passing. It has been used on activists and political dissidents. It has been used on netizens who say or post "offensive" things online. Our freedom of speech and expression is still being restricted by the Government through the use of the Sedition Act.

The Act is a colonial vestige. It was enacted before the Federation of Malaya achieved independence and it was used by the British to deal with militant communists insurgents at the time.

The Act criminalises "sedition" by making it an offence to do anything which has a "seditious tendency" or to utter any seditious words. "Seditious" is defined in the Act as any act, speech, words, publication or other thing that qualifies as one having a "seditious tendency".

What is a "seditious tendency"? Almost anything can and would have a "seditious tendency", going by the Act's definition. Any criticism of the Government would be seditious. Any comment made that can raise ill will and hostility within the population. What is said or done may even be justified, yet would still fall foul of the Act. For a sedition charge to succeed, the prosecution does not even need to establish intention of the accused to be seditious.

Freedom of speech and expression is not absolute. But restrictions to freedom of speech and expression should not be arbitrarily applied. The threshold should not be what the Government believes to be seditious. It is not for the Government to decide what can and cannot be said. The Act is so wide and arbitrary that it can and has been abused by the Government to stop people from saying things it does not condone.

So what do we do when the Government has not fulfilled its pledge to repeal the Sedition Act? Well, we as citizens should pressure the Government to come good on its promise. There have been repeated calls from political parties, civil society and the Malaysian Bar for the Government to repeal the Act. But not a concentrated effort.

The  National Young Lawyers Committee of the Bar Council will take the initiative. But this is not just a movement for lawyers. It will be a nationwide movement, made out of all members of society. The law affects everyone, so its repeal must be demanded by everyone.

The time for talking is over. It is time to take action. It is time for all those who want to see the end of the Sedition Act to come together. It is time for a movement - focused and dedicated to a singular goal - to make the Government repeal the Sedition Act.

* Syahredzan is a young lawyer and also the Chairperson of the National Young Lawyers Committee of the Bar Council. The first meeting of the movement to repeal the Sedition Act will be held on Aug 28, 2014, 7.30pm at the Bar Council. All are invited.

MH17 : Remains Of Six Expected To Be Released Within 48 Hours

From Mohd Faizal Hassan

THE HAGUE, Aug 25 (Bernama) -- The remains of at least six more Malaysian victims of the flight MH17 tragedy are expected to be released within 48 hours from today from the Military Medical Centre in Hilversum, near here for funeral arrangements and to be sent home.

According to sources, the six victims were identified as Malaysians after undergoing the identification process and autopsy recently.

"Normally, the morgue will inform the Army Medical Centre to take the remains for funeral arrangements according to their respective religions," he said.

Speaking to Bernama and Radio Televisyen Malaysia (RTM) today, he said hopefully the remains of the six victims could be sent back this week.

According to the Standard Operations Procedure, as soon as the remains have been identified as belonging to a country, the victim will have to undergo four important processes.

This included getting the death and medical certificates, disaster report, victim transportation permit and the letter of consent from the Dutch public prosecutor for the remains to be buried or cremated.

Once the process is completed, the remains will be moved to the Monuta Innemee funeral home in S-Gravenhage here, about 90km from Hilversum for funeral rites according to each's religion.

A Bernama survey of the morgue found a family member of the victims discussing the funeral rites.

Those present at the discussion at about 11am, which included representatives of Malaysia Airlines (MAS), seemed calm and asked the morgue officials questions concerning travel arrangements for about an hour.

Last Friday, the remains of the first group of 20 victims,which included 11 passengers and nine crew members, were brought home from Amsterdam in a special aircraft.

Yesterday, the remains of the second group of three victims arrived in Malaysia.

Flight MH17 crashed in eastern Ukraine on July 17 as it was flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur with 283 passengers and 15 crew on board. The Boeing 777-200 aircraft is believed to have been shot down over the troubled country.

Ambiga: Dissolving S'gor DUN is not acceptable

Azmin: PAS 'bully' issue in T'ganu can be dealt with amicably

ISIS Beheading Videos Banned, ISIL Leader Says Islam ‘Is Not The Religion Of The Western Hippie’

With the ISIS beheading videos being banned on major media outlets like YouTube, Facebook, and LiveLeak, some on social media claim this is the “thought police” at work, and that such violent videos do not “allow anyone to forget how violent Islam has been since it was founded.” Tarkhan Batirashvili, aka Abu Omar al-Shishani, is the military chief for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and he might agree with these critics since he claims that Islam “is not the religion of the western hippie.” But does banning the videos hinder the cause of the Islamic terrorist group?

In a related report by The Inquisitr, one of the most infamous ISIS beheading videos to make its way to the western world was the execution of James Foley by a British Islamic fighter. It was reported that ISIS offered a ransom demand before killing him and a special ops team tried and failed to rescue him back in July. The Foley family has since released a statement regarding the death of their son. President Obama denounced the terrorists for the ISIS beheadings videos but otherwise did little to persuade the world to take action, although some hope that various nations will rally together to declare a World War on ISIS.

According to al-Shishani, ISIS has already declared war on the world and promises to “fight them until they accept our rule” under a new Islamic caliphate. Al-Shishani is a Chechen terrorist who converted to Islam while spending three years in prison for illegally harboring weapons. The terrorist was named commander of the northern sector of Syria by the ISIS in 2013, only to be named their military leader in June of 2014.

In a recent interview with Australian talk show host Tom Elliott, al-Shishani promised to invade Iran when the ISIS in Iraq finish their goals. He also stated that their enemy is anyone who opposes Islam:

“We will fight them. We will take their women. We will take their children. They have to come to Islam or they will get wiped out.”

When al-Shishani was asked about the ISIS beheading videos and the crucifixions, the ISIL leader admitted the goal is to subjugate the entire world underneath the Islamic caliphate and that anyone might become a target:

“Everybody who stands about us and makes trouble in our land. This is according to Sharia [and] God.”

The talk show host then specifically asked the ISIS leader if Islam is a religion of peace. While al-Shishani did not specifically say “yes” or “no,” his actual answer was not exactly comforting:

“It is the religion of prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam. It is not the religion of the Western hippie who tries to be accepted by you.”

You can listen to the full interview here:

LiveLeak also released a statement explaining why they believe the ISIS beheading videos need to be banned:

“We will not be showing further beheadings carried out by [ISIS]. We’ve shown the world the true horror of this form of execution more than once in the past and we cannot find any compelling reason to even be thought of as promoting the actions of this group. There is no reason at all to show more beheadings.”

Critics of this decision claim media outlets are watering down the truth by attempting to make the situation more family friendly. Those who support the decision say the only reason to watch such videos is because people desire to watch these gruesome actions and not because they desire to know the truth. They also contend that ISIS wants the videos to be spread and watching them only encourages more ISIS beheadings.

Do you think banning the violent ISIS beheading videos helps or hinders the cause of the Islamic terrorist group?

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1426809/isis-beheading-videos-banned-isil-leader-says-islam-is-not-the-religion-of-the-western-hippie/#cKtmihi2sm6Iwfgf.99

If Umno respects Dr M, they should reply to his criticisms

Perhaps the point is lost on Umno information chief Datuk Ahmad Maslan that Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad did complain and criticise Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak privately.

But it didn't work, so the country's longest-serving prime minister had to take his complaints and criticisms out in the open for all to see, no matter if Umno's political foes take advantage of it.

This isn't the first time that Dr Mahathir has publicly dropped support for an Umno president. He did it to Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi two years ahead of the 2008 general elections.

The Umno information chief said although he respected Dr Mahathir, he felt that the veteran politician should have been circumspect with his criticism of Najib's leadership.

"Please bear in mind that the situation and circumstances during Mahathir's times are different from Najib, both economically and politically," he said during a speech at the Seputeh Umno meeting today.

This is the thing with Umno politicians who cannot argue with Dr Mahathir, who was in power for more than 22 years. Instead of arguing with him point for point, Umno politicians insist they respect him but the circumstances are different.

How different is it? Umno and Barisan Nasional (BN) still hold Putrajaya. They still control the mass media. They run the economy and under Najib, have put several transformation programmes for the country to be a high-income nation come 2020.

But they have yet to argue that Najib's policies have worked although Putrajaya's efficiency agency, Performance Management and Delivery Unit (Pemandu) says that the policies are working.

Let's put in perspective what Dr Mahathir said this past week was carried only by the online media and not the mainstream electronic and print media.

“I have tried to give my views to him directly, which are also the views of many people who have met me," wrote Dr Mahathir on his popular blog, chedet.cc.

"This has not been effective so I have to criticise. I have no choice but to withdraw my support," he said, adding that Najib was no better than his predecessor, Tun Abdullah Badawi.

Dr Mahathir said he had hoped Najib learnt lessons from his poor performance in the last general election but it appeared that he had not.

“Many policies, approaches and actions taken by the government under Najib have destroyed inter-racial ties, the economy and the country’s finances,” he wrote, citing the BR1M direct cash aid and kow-towing to foreign countries.

This isn't new from Dr Mahathir. He has articulated this in the past in his blog and several forums in the past year. So why bother asking him to continue criticising in private when it has not worked?

This is the same mentality as having no-contests in Umno elections, which was the standard practice when Umno was reconstituted after being made illegal in 1988.

So times have changed, as Ahmad Maslan says. But Umno elections are still the same no-contests as in Dr Mahathir's time to ensure party unity.

If there is truly a change in situation, Umno politicians like Ahmad Maslan should take it upon themselves to reply to Dr Mahathir point by point. Respect Dr Mahathir by arguing with him, not asking him to criticise in private. – August 23, 2014.

- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/if-umno-respects-dr-m-they-should-reply-to-his-criticisms#sthash.OvIDZy4j.dpuf

Disciplinary hearing against Cecil postponed - Malaysiakini

The disciplinary hearing against senior lawyer Cecil Abraham, who is in the centre of a storm in the legal fraternity, has been postponed.

A source told Malaysiakini that the hearing before a disciplinary committee of the Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary Board this morning was put off after one of the three-member panel could not make it.

The disciplinary committee is aimed at establishing the facts behind claims of misconduct against Cecil (left) and his son Sunil, who allegedly drafted a statutory declaration (SD) for private investigator P Balasubramaniam under duress.

The SD was for Balasubramaniam to retract his first SD just a day before,when he had linked Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak with murdered Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.

If found guilty, the committee may recommend actions such as dismissal as counsel, a reprimand, a fine or suspension not exceeding five years, though the recommendations do not necessarily need to be taken up by the board.

Lawyer Americk Sidhu (below), who helped draft Balasubramaniam’s first SD, had revealed at a Malaysian Bar annual general meeting last year that Cecil admitted drafting the second SD on Najib’s instructions.

The revelation to the AGM came a day after Balasubramaniam’s death.
He and his family had been in exile for more than four years after the first SD retraction.

This led to the disciplinary hearing against Cecil.

Bar Council vice-president Steven Thiru, when contacted, declined to either deny or confirm the postponement.

"This is all supposed to be confidential, I cannot comment," he said.

'Mystery witness'

However, the source told Malaysiakini that a new hearing is expected to be held sometime in October or November.

Malaysiakini on Wednesday reported that a "mystery witness" was to testify at the disciplinary hearing today.

It was speculated that the person is a lawyer who was initially approached to draft Balasubramaniam’s second SD, which the person declined and the role was given to Cecil.

Balasubramaniam’s (left) family, who returned to Malaysia in 2013, filed a RM1.9 million suit at the Kuala Lumpur High Court, where they named Najib and his wife Rosmah Mansor, two of Najib’s brothers as well as Cecil, in the suit.

They are claiming losses and damages suffered during the time of their "forced exile".

All the parties being sued by Balasubramaniam’s widow have filed applications to strike it out.

To date, the death of Altantuyaa Shaariibuu, reportedly involved in a multi-billion ringgit Scorpene submarine deal, remains unsolved.

Two police Special Action Unit members, namely Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, were found guilty at the Shah Alam High Court with murdering Altantuya, while political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda, once Najib’s close confidante, was acquitted.

However, the two police officers were both acquitted by the Court of Appeal last year and a decision is pending on the two policemen, following the prosecution’s appeal to the Federal Court.

Repent, Indian chambers of commerce tells Dr M

 

The Indian business community has joined the chorus of Umno leaders defending Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak against former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad's scathing criticism.

In a statement today, Malaysian Associated Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Maicci) said that instead of flaying Najib, Mahathir (below) should “reflect on his own weaknesses”.

“Mahathir should stop discrediting the current prime minister but first look at his own weaknesses and please also keep in mind that being an elder statesman, whatever you say is gospel truth.

“The Maicci management committee would like to convey to (Mahathir) to always think good, do good and say good and repent for your wrong doings during your tenure,” Maicci secretary-general M Davendran said.

He added that Malaysia’s growth data – growing above expectation at 6.4 percent in the second quarter of 2014 - shows that the country is on the right track under Najib’s leadership.

“On the ground, among the business community, much is being felt with improved sentiments and spending from both business and consumers.

“This is indeed a strong testament of the direction taken by the country’s leadership to ensure Malaysia stays on track in meeting its vision,” he said.

He added that Najib’s commitment to the business community was also underscored when he had himself engaged Maicci in a dialogue in July.

“We were deeply surprised at the time taken at such a senior level to understand the business community’s needs and the preparedness of the senior leadership to engage with business leaders, in spite of our strong differences of opinion.

“In our opinion, Malaysia’s success economically at this juncture is due to this style of leadership of our prime minister,” he said.

Proton should fund itself

On a separate matter, Maicci disagreed with Mahathir’s proposal that a RM1.7 billion government grant be given to Proton Holdings.

“Maicci (is) of the opinion that Proton Holdings is a private entity and they should be funded by the shareholders and not via Malaysian taxpayers’ money,” he said.

Proton had in July reportedly submitted a request to the Economic Council for a grant of RM1.7 billion.

The request came after Mahathir, who is Proton chairperson, said the carmaker will seek “reimbursement” from the government for the roughly RM300 million spent on research and development for its new car.

He had attacked Najib for being too “soft” and “quiet” on critical issues, and said that he regretted chosing him to replace than fifth prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Mahathir had campaigned hard to unseat Abdullah, whom he had hand-picked as a successor.

The Umno veteran’s assault  latest on Najib has prompted an ardent show of support for the PM from Umno leaders and cabinet members.

No guarantee only Wan Azizah’s name will be submitted, says Azmin

(The Star) – There is no guarantee that PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail will be the sole name submitted to the palace for consideration for the post of Selangor Mentri Besar, said Azmin Ali.

The PKR deputy president said that based on past practices, the three parties in Pakatan Rakyat would submit their respective choices separately.

“In 2008 and 2013, the three component parties sent the names of the MB separately.

“However, the difference then was that we agreed to a common name,” he told reporters at the PKR 10th National Congress, Saturday.

He said that Pakatan on a whole had decided on Dr Wan Azizah and that it was up to the individual parties to submit the proposed name.

When asked if there was a possibility of PAS submitting two names, Azmin said that it was PAS’ prerogative.

“That is a decision for PAS to make which we must respect.

“I can’t speak on behalf of PAS even though my nomination was endorsed by them,” he said.

Azmin also confirmed that Selangor PAS’s 13 assemblymen had yet to sign the statutory declaration supporting Dr Wan Azizah.

“We have sent 30 names that signed the statutory declaration.

“We have the majority, it is now up to the Sultan to analyse the documents and come to a wise decision,” he said.

Meanwhile, PKR adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said that Pakatan had convened a meeting on Friday to discuss the legal implications of the Selangor crisis with their lawyers.

He noted the issue over a different name to be submitted to the palace does not arise as Pakatan will maintain its earlier decision to nominate Dr Wan Azizah.

Two non-Muslim MH17 victims to be cremated on Sunday

The remains of two non-Muslim Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 victims, Foo Ming Lee and Ng Qing Zheng, will be cremated at the Nirvana Memorial Park in Shah Alam this Sunday.

A deputy general manager of NV Care Sdn Bhd Teh Khai Lin said Foo’s remains would be kept at the Nirvana Memorial Centre in Sungai Besi for two days from today for religious rites before being brought to Shah Alam.

“Ng’s remains will be stored for one day and brought back to his residence at Kota Kemuning, Selangor, tomorrow before it is taken to Shah Alam for the cremation rites on Sunday,” he told reporters at the centre in Kuala Lumpur today.

He said the process of receiving and handling the remains of the four non-Muslim victims had run smoothly.

They are the remains of Foo, Ng, Paul Rajasingam Sivagnanam and his wife, Mabel Anthony Samy.

The couple’s remains will be kept at the centre until tomorrow before being brought to their home in Bangsar in Kuala Lumpur.

Flight MH17 crashed in eastern Ukraine on July 17 as it was flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur with 283 passengers and 15 crew members on board. The Boeing 777-200 aircraft is believed to have been shot down over the troubled country.

The remains of 20 of the 43 Malaysian victims who perished in the tragedy were brought home from the Netherlands in a special aircraft.

Putrajaya has declared yesterday as a day of national mourning and a special ceremony was held to honour the victims at the Bunga Raya Complex in the Kuala Lumpur International Airport upon the arrival. – Bernama

The sedition of Surendran

Someone might actually be committing sedition without knowing it because the definition of sedition in the act is broad and vague.

The Sedition Act of today is the updated form of the Sedition Ordinance 1948, a law designed to silence critics of the British colonial government. In 1948, the biggest threat to colonialism in Malaysia was Communism, and its embodiment in the form of the Communist Party of Malaysia. The Sedition Act is the sibling of the Internal Security Act (ISA).

In a nutshell or non-legal speak, it is a law which allows its enforcers to put someone away for saying or publishing anything deemed to be seditious. Someone might actually be committing sedition without knowing it because the definition of sedition in the act is broad and vague.

Rest assured you are safe complaining about the terrible nasi lemak you had, but you would be walking a fine line when you grumble about the unfairness of GST. Anything beyond that and you might be facing a three-year jail sentence or a RM5,000 fine or both. The saving grace about this in comparison to the ISA is that it limits the punishment and allows you your day in court.

The terrifying downside is that you might have committed a crime without intending to do so because you didn’t even know it was a crime. A case in point is the Form 5 lad who is being investigated under this law for clicking the Like button while surfing the “I love Israel” page on Facebook.

The now repealed ISA was its bigger brother, in that it gave its enforcers the right to lock-up any individual whom the enforcers believed would commit, cause, or incite a security breach, without any recourse to trial, for an indefinite period. It is preventive in its action because it seeks to pre-empt the alleged security breach. However in practice it is also used after the fact.

Just imagine going to jail for something you haven’t done but because someone believes you would. No proof, no courts, no dice roll, straight to jail without passing Go. That is the gist of the ISA.

Last Tuesday, N Surendran was charged under the Sedition Act at the Sessions Court for allegedly making false statements in connection with Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy trial. Surendran is Anwar’s defence lawyer in that trial, as well as a PKR member of parliament for Padang Serai.

200 police reports

According to Surendran, he was discussing with the media the substance of a defence argument used in the Court of Appeal and how that could be relevant in the upcoming Federal Court hearing, and the Prime Minister’s name was brought up. The next thing you know 200 or so police reports are lodged against Surendran by Umno members accusing him of spreading falsehoods about Najib. The Public Prosecutor pressed charges.

Former Federal Court judge Gopal Sri Ram seems to think it valid for a defence attorney to discuss the merits of a judgement, or even disagree, so long as no disparaging remarks are directed at the judges themselves.

Human Rights Watch (Asia) says that this is “another blatant example of a draconian law being used to violate freedom of expression and silence critics” of Najib’s government.

In the legal profession, lawyers often have to walk that fine line if they are to represent their clients to the best of their abilities. Surendran was walking that fine line in the exercise of his duties as Anwar’s counsel.

Although not facing anything as serious, so was Edmund Bon in his defence of Khalid Ibrahim, as Bon was subjected to a Twitter campaign of hate by others in the legal fraternity, very much like the Form 5 boy who faced hate and resentment from teachers and schoolmates for simply being naïve.

This boy faces both the threat of the Sedition Act as well the hate from school and on Facebook.

This tool of convenience has been used frequently by the authorities in what seems a very arbitrary manner. It is a law no longer in step with the times and often abused as the catch all since the repeal of the ISA.

Snap polls could see chaos and uncertainty in Selangor, forum told

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 23 ― The Sultan’s consent to dissolve the state assembly for snap polls would be an irreversible decision that may send the state hurtling into chaos, Prof Dr Abdul Aziz Bari told a forum on the mentri besar crisis last night.

The regularly-cited constitutional expert expressed fears of possible attempts to trigger unrest that may allow Putrajaya to regain control of Selangor via an emergency.

“If it is dissolved, we can do nothing … If this Monday His Highness decides to dissolve it, then it will be dissolved,” Aziz said of the state assembly.

Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim is set to meet the Selangor Sultan on Monday, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The Selangor University (Unisel) lecturer pointed out to a previous case of an unsuccessful challenge against the dissolution of the Sabah state assembly, to back his point.

But he asserted that Khalid no longer has the authority to request for a dissolution of the assembly, as he can be considered a “caretaker” MB after a demonstrable loss of confidence in his administration among state lawmakers.

Citing the cases of the 1977 Kelantan Emergency and the 1966 Sarawak Constitutional Crisis, Aziz said an emergency might be declared in Selangor should chaos be instigated by agents provocateur.

“I’m worried it would turn out like that, it created a chaos. Then this provides the ground for the authorities to do what they want,” Aziz claimed.

In the 1966 Sarawak crisis, the federal government declared a state of emergency to reinstate a new chief minister after a High Court declared that the ouster of the previous chief minister Tan Sri Stephen Kalong Ningkan was illegal.

In the 1977 emergency, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong similarly declared emergency at the request of the federal government after street violence and a political impasse.

The impasse and violence happened after Kelantan MB Datuk Muhammad Nasir requested consent from the Regent of Kelantan for a dissolution of state assembly, but was refused instead.

Other panelists in the forum last night was electoral watchdog Bersih 2.0 chairman Maria Chin Abdullah and Khairul Ariffin Mohd Munir, the vice-president of Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia (ABIM). It was moderated by Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan of the coalition Negara-Ku.

Selangor was thrown into a leadership crisis after PKR sacked Khalid for refusing to yield his position to party president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail.

Khalid responded by removing all hostile PKR and DAP officials from his executive council, leaving Selangor in the hands of an independent MP and four excos from PAS.

The Pakatan Rakyat parties banded together last Sunday to demand Khalid’s resignation, saying he no longer commanded the confidence of the state’s lawmakers.

Khalid is refusing to acknowledge this until it is tested in a vote of no-confidence in the state assembly.