Share |
Showing posts with label Altantunya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Altantunya. Show all posts

Tuesday, 17 December 2019

MP: Focus on ex-AG, cops and judges in Altantuya murder case as well

Thirteen years after Altantuya Shaariibuu was shot dead and her remains blown up with explosives in a secondary forest in Shah Alam, one of her convicted killers has claimed that he had acted on the orders of former premier Najib Abdul Razak.

In 2015, the Federal Court had upheld the conviction of former police special action force (UTK) chief inspector Azilah Hadri and another personnel from the elite unit Sirul Azhar Umar for the murder and sentenced the pair to death.

While Sirul managed to flee Malaysia after the Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's conviction and is now in an immigration detention centre in Australia, Azilah, however, had spent the last four years on death row in the Kajang prison.

The courts, however, did not establish a motive for the murder of the Mongolian national.

Following Azilah's damning allegations in a statutory declaration (SD) filed together with an affidavit seeking a judicial review of the Federal Court's decision and a retrial, DAP lawmaker Lim Lip Eng said the authorities must re-examine the entire saga from start to end.

“Since the onset, the trial was shrouded in controversy,” he told Malaysiakini this evening.

Among others, he said, the prosecution did not call Najib's former aide de camp, DSP Musa Safri, to testify during the trial.

“The motive behind her murder was never revealed because the judge was reported to have said that 'motive, although relevant, has never been essential to constitute murder.'

“The prosecution did not appeal [Abdul] Razak Baginda's acquittal. The immigration department did not have any record of Altantuya entering Malaysia,” he added.

In his SD, Azilah had outlined Musa's alleged role in the “covert operation”, which led to Altantuya's murder.

He also claimed that Razak Baginda, who was a close associate of Najib, had also asked him to kill the woman.

According to Azilah, both Najib, who was then deputy premier, and Razak Baginda had purportedly convinced him that Altantuya was a foreign spy who posed a threat to national security.

Razak Baginda was initially charged with abetting the murder but was later discharged.

Demanding a re-investigation into the fresh allegations, Lim, who is also a lawyer, said the authorities must not only focus on whether Najib and Razak Baginda had ordered the killing.

He said the actions of the then attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail, the police officers who conducted the investigation, the DPPs who prosecuted and the judges who heard the case must also be scrutinised.

“This definitely warrants a re-investigation by a new police team or perhaps a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI).

“The ex AG, prosecutors, judges, lawyers and others involved in the trial should help the new investigation team to see that justice is done,” he added.

Lim said if investigations revealed that there was collusion to protect certain individuals, then those involved must also be brought to justice.

In his affidavit seeking a review, Azilah had claimed there was suppression of evidence and material facts during the proceedings at the High Court and Court of Appeal.

Meanwhile, Najib had dismissed the allegations as a fabrication and accused the Pakatan Harapan government of wanting to silence him and divert attention from its shortcomings.

Azilah's SD will have severe impact on PI Bala suit, says lawyer


An explosive statutory declaration (SD) that fingered Najib Abdul Razak as allegedly giving the order for the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu, will have a “severe impact” in a bid to include former prime minister Najib Razak and seven others as third parties in the PI Bala civil suit linked to the Mongolian national’s death.

This was revealed by lawyer Vinod Kamalanathan, who is acting for Deepak Jaikishan in the carpet businessperson’s third-party bid against Najib, his wife Rosmah Mansor and six others.

“If it (SD) does involve PI Bala and the rest of the party (Najib and seven others), it would have a severe impact on the case,” Vinod told Malaysiakini this afternoon.

Vinod was referring to Malaysiakini’s exclusive report today over the SD by former Special Action Unit (UTK) officer Azilah Hadri, which alleged that the then deputy prime minister gave Azilah the order to murder Altantuya.

Azilah and fellow ex-UTK officer Sirul Azhar Umar were convicted and sentenced to death by the Federal Court over Altantuya's 2006 murder.

On Oct 29 last year, the Kuala Lumpur High Court directed Deepak’s lawyers to serve third-party claims against Najib, Rosmah, Najib's siblings Ahmad Johari and Nazim, lawyers Cecil Abraham, Sunil Abraham and M Arulampalam, and commissioner of oaths Zainal Abidin Muhayat.

Initially, Najib, Rosmah, Johari, Nazim, Cecil, Sunil, Arulampalam, Zainal and Deepak were named as defendants in the civil action over the 2008 exile to India purportedly suffered by the late private investigator P Balasubramaniam (photo), popularly known as PI Bala, and his family, linked to the 2006 murder.

However, on July 25 last year, the Court of Appeal allowed applications by Najib and several others to remove him, Rosmah, Johari, Nazim, Cecil, Sunil, Arulampalam and Zainal from the legal action.

The Court of Appeal outcome left Deepak as the sole defendant in the said suit, which was initially filed in August 2017.

Following this, Deepak applied for the High Court to issue third-party notices against Najib and his affiliates so that they would share the damages and liabilities in case the court ruled in favour of Balasubramaniam's widow.

During case management of the suit on Jan 8 this year, counsel for Najib, Rosmah, Johari, Nazim, Cecil, Sunil, Arulampalam and Zainal objected to them being added as third parties in the suit filed by Balasubramaniam’s widow, A Santamil Selvi, and the couple’s three children.

Vinod today said he would be meeting his client Deepak to discuss the potential impact and ramification of the SD, which could have “severe impact” on his client’s third-party application against Najib and the other seven individuals.

“We are going to pursue the matter, I will meet the client (Deepak) and discuss the issue," he told Malaysiakini.

"The other parties (Najib and the seven others) were struck out (of the suit by the Court of Appeal last year). We have put in the application to bring them in (as third parties into the suit) that is still pending in the court.

“This recent SD (by Azilah) will have a bearing, but I have to discuss with the client (Deepak) over this new piece of information," Vinod added.

“Azilah is seeking for the Federal Court to order retrial (over the murder case). Just a mere statement alone will not have an impact, though. We need to see what he (Azilah) will introduce (as evidence in the application for the Federal Court to review the verdict in the Altantuya murder case)."

Vinod believes that he (Azilah) was asking for a retrial (of the Altantuya murder case) as there was (alleged) substantial evidence (purportedly) suppressed in the initial (Altantuya murder) trial.

“We do not know what that is, so we need to see what evidence he (Azilah) intend to introduce,” Vinod said.

It was reported that Balasubramaniam and his family returned from India in February 2013. However, the private investigator died a month after returning to Malaysia due to a heart attack.

Azilah's Statutory declaration - Convinced of threat, I agreed to do it for my beloved nation


Almost five years after the Federal Court upheld his conviction and death sentence in January 2015, former police special action force (UTK) personnel Azilah Hadri has broken his silence on the gruesome murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Seeking a review of the Federal Court's decision and re-trial, Azilah made a series of explosive allegations in a statutory declaration (SD).

He accused former premier Najib Abdul Razak and the latter's close associate Abdul Razak Baginda of ordering the killing of the Mongolian national.

He claimed that both Najib and Razak Baginda had claimed that Altantuya was a foreign spy, who was a threat to national security.

Below is the full version of Azilah's SD:

I, Azilah bin Hadri (No KIP: 1 /14055) am a Malaysian citizen who is of mature age and currently serving [a prison sentence] sentence at the Kajang prison, verily and truthfully affirm the following:

I have been tried and convicted by the Shah Alam High Court for a charge as follows:

"That you together [with Sirul Azhar Umar] between 10.00pm Oct 19, 2006 to 1.00am Oct 20, 2006 between Lot 12843 and Lot 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja in the Petaling district within the state of Selangor Darul Ehsan, in the common intention, killed by causing death to Altantuya Shaariibuu Passport No. E0217865, a citizen of Mongolia and therefore you have committed an offence punishable under section 302 of the Penal Code read together with section 34 of the same code. "

At the end of the trial, at the High Court of Shah Alam, the second accused, Sirul Azhar Umar and I were sentenced to death by hanging. The Court of Appeal later released me and Sirul from the conviction for the failure of the public prosecutor to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

The Federal Court, however, allowed the public prosecutor’s appeal and found Sirul and me guilty of the said charge and at the same time sentenced us to death.

I swear by the name of Allah SWT, most gracious, most merciful that I am now going through my last days before I am sentenced by hanging. I have no intention to persecute or offend any party, [and] shall state the truth, of the matter, to my knowledge of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder, so that the truth might be be exposed. May I confront this punishment with a calm conscience and in the blessings of Allah SWT.

Oct 17, 2006: On official duty at the Sri Kenangan Residence, Pekan, DSP Musa Safri, aide-de-camp to the deputy prime minister (DPM) at that time, Najib [Abdul] Razak told me that the DPM wanted to see me. Musa told me that there was an assignment to be carried out in Kuala Lumpur.

I asked Musa what the assignment was. Musa replied: “Secret assignment involving state security.” Musa informed me that the assignment in Kuala Lumpur was at Bukit Damansara. I told Musa that it was under the jurisdiction of the Brickfields police.

Musa asked if I knew any officer at the Brickfields police headquarters. I told him that the head of the criminal investigation division, DSP Idris and I were friends when we were at the Sepang police headquarters where I was then an investigating officer.

Musa told me there was a VIP who is the special officer to the DPM and also the DPM’s friend who is facing a threat. I suggested to Musa that the said VIP lodge a police report so that the police can conduct further investigations. I said I would then contact the head of the division to assist.

Musa said this was a difficult operation and should not be made public knowledge. I sought clarification several times from Musa why this matter cannot be known publicly and why a police report cannot be made.

Musa could not explain. He then went into the house and about five minutes later, he came back and brought me to see the DPM.

Musa brought me to see the DPM in an office room at the Sri Kenangan residence in Pekan after which he left the room. The DPM asked me if I knew any police officers at the Brickfields police station to which I replied in the affirmative.

The DPM then told me that a foreign spy is in Kuala Lumpur and is trying to threaten the DPM and his special officer known as [Abdul] Razak Baginda.

The special officer was a good friend of the DPM whom I met during my official assignment in London sometime ago.

I was informed that the foreign spy was a woman and was very dangerous because of the numerous secrets she knew about national security.

The foreign spy could not approach the DPM due to the tight security [detail] and therefore the foreign spy is threatening the DPM’s special officer [instead].

The DPM instructed me to carry out a covert operation when I returned to Kuala Lumpur later.

I had to be cautious about the foreign spy woman as she is a smart talker and is cunning - one of which is that she [claims to be] is pregnant.

I told the DPM that a police report had to be made on this matter and I would ask for help from my friend at the Brickfields police headquarters but this was turned down by the DPM.

The DPM stated that this [matter] could not be publicly known as it [involved] a threat to national security. The DPM then instructed me to carry out a covert operation to arrest and destroy the spy secretly and destroy her body using explosives.

I asked the DPM what he meant by “arrest and destroy the foreign spy” and he responded: “Shoot to kill,” indicating a “neck cut signal.”

Asked about the purpose of destroying the foreign spy with explosives, the DPM replied: “Dispose the foreign spy's body with an explosive device to remove the traces. The explosives can be obtained from the UTK store [armoury].”

The DPM reminded me to carry out this covert operation carefully and with a high level of security and secrecy as it involved a threat to national security.

I suggested that the foreign spy be arrested and expelled from the country but the DPM did not agree with me. The DPM told me to keep him informed of any progress on this covert operation and to take further instructions from Musa or him.

The DPM also instructed me to meet his special officer in Kuala Lumpur for details on the foreign spy.

The DPM handed me a white Samsung mobile phone for me to be in direct contact with him. The DPM also reminded me that the mobile phone had to be disposed of after the covert operation was completed.

The DPM then asked me: “When are you going back to KL?” I replied: “Tomorrow.”

The DPM said: “When you reach KL, call my special officer. Did Musa give his phone number?” l shook my head. The DPM said: “Then my special officer will give further instructions. Follow my special officer's instructions because all the instructions come from me.”

I said “yes” before leaving the room. The meeting with the DPM was about five to 10 minutes. When I left the DPM’s room, I saw Musa sitting in a chair outside.

Musa got up and asked me to wait in the garage outside and I saw him going back into the DPM’s office.

I was waiting for Musa in the garage. He came over and gave me a phone number of the DPM’s special officer - Razak Baginda.

Musa reminded me to contact Razak Baginda upon returning to Kuala Lumpur later. I told Musa that I did not know Razak Baginda. Musa replied that I had met Razak Baginda during my services as an escort officer of the DPM in London. But I still could not remember.

Musa said he was confident that I would remember when I met Razak Baginda later. After completing the official assignment in Pekan and in Kuantan, the DPM reminded me to meet his friend - his special officer when returning to Kuala Lumpur and I replied: “OK.”

Musa also reminded me of the same thing. That night, I returned to Kuala Lumpur.

Oct 18, 2006: As soon as I arrived in Kuala Lumpur in the morning, I contacted Razak Baginda via the telephone number given by Musa the previous day. But it was the wrong number and others were answering the call.

I then contacted Musa to inform him. Musa gave Razak Baginda’s phone number again to me. I kept calling the phone number and when my call was answered, I asked whether the person I contacted was Razak Baginda and he said, “Yes”.

I introduced myself and Razak Baginda told me that he was informed that I would contact him and asked me to go to his office at Bangunan Getah Asli. I said: “OK.”

Razak Baginda then gave his office address. At that time, I wondered why it was so easy for me to meet Razak Baginda, who was a special officer of the DPM and a good friend of the DPM without any appointment.

I assumed that all meetings had been arranged by Musa or the DPM because of this covert operation involving a threat to national security.

I went to the Bangunan Getah Asli and reported at the security counter formally in accordance with the set procedures.

When I arrived at the office, I was greeted by a woman. I asked if this was the office of Razak Baginda. The woman replied in the affirmative. She asked me if I was Azilah and I said, “Yes”. I was then brought into a room.

Shortly thereafter, a man came in and introduced himself as Razak Baginda. At that time, I remembered who this VIP was. I met him in the United Kingdom a long time ago when we boarded a special chartered aircraft together from Liverpool to London with the DPM after attending the British Open.

As a security officer to the DPM when he travelled to London, I had escorted the DPM and Razak Baginda to a condominium located not far from the hotel where the DPM stayed.

During the meeting with Razak Baginda at his office, I introduced myself as a police officer from Bukit Aman UTK and that I was instructed by the DPM to meet him and Musa.

Razak Baginda told me that he was aware that I would call and meet him on the DPM’s instructions to get more information on a covert operation involving threats to national security.

Razak Baginda then told me that a foreign spy had threatened the DPM and sent a threatening letter; made a phone call; created a commotion at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli; and also tried to go to his house but was prevented by security guards.

Razak Baginda also said the foreign spy was trailing his movements around Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya but was unable to approach the DPM due to tight security from the UTK and the police at the official residence of the DPM.

Razak Baginda then took out several white and brown envelopes and asked me to read the contents of the letters. I asked Razak Baginda whether all the envelopes were sent by the foreign spy and he said, “Yes.”

I asked permission to view and open all the letters but Razak Baginda did not approve. I told Razak Baginda what is the point of being restricted to one letter. I was better off not reading at all.

I then handed back the letter to him and I noticed that his face changed as he did not like my response, but I ignored it. Razak Baginda was holding a piece of A4 paper and told me that I was not allowed to get a copy and could only note the important details. The details given by Razak Baginda to me while referring to the A4 paper were as follows:

- The foreign spy was a Mongolian citizen named Altantuya @ Amina who has three passports -- from Mongolia, France and Russia.

- She was intelligent, a clever speaker and a spy.

- It would be easy to recognise the foreign spy because she looked like a Chinese woman.

- Several pieces of information related to national secrets, national security assets and the DPM’s secrets are known to this foreign spy.

- The DPM is worried that this foreign spy would reveal those secrets.

- The foreign spy had come to Malaysia twice.

- She is a danger to national security, threat to national security.

- The foreign spy is full of deception among others she [claims to be] is pregnant.

- She is staying at Hotel Malaya, where there are two room numbers because the foreign spy changes room.

I asked what kind of threat did the foreign spy use to threaten him and the DPM. Razak Baginda replied that the foreign spy wanted a lot of money but he refused to entertain her.

The foreign spy threatened to leak the country's secrets that could jeopardise the security of the country if her demands were not met.

I asked what he meant by country's secrets that could threaten the security of the nation, Razak Baginda replied that she had knowledge of the details of the country's security assets, about the personal relationship of the DPM and Razak Baginda with that foreign spy.

Razak Baginda also talked about the DPM’s official visit to London to review state security assets during an air show at the Farnborough Air Show.

Razak Baginda asked me if I remembered a woman whom he and the DPM met at the lobby of a condominium in London.

I told him that I could not remember her but I remembered that I had escorted the DPM and Razak Baginda from the hotel to the condominium. Razak Baginda then told me that the woman is the foreign spy which he meant. I said, “Ok” and at the same time I tried to recall the face of the woman but it was still not clear to me.

Razak Baginda also told me that some of his people including an Indian man named Bala [believed to be the late private investigator P Balasubramaniam] monitoring the foreign spy’s movements and that I would be informed about her movements from time to time.

I suggested that a report be made for the police to take action but Razak Baginda disagreed as this would attract public attention as it involved the DPM and threats to national security. I told him that I would have nothing to do with this matter and I was reluctant to carry out this covert operation.

I told him: “If you want to file a police report, I can help.” Razak Baginda told me that the DPM had instructed me while in Pekan to carry out this covert operation for national security and the DPM believed I could carry out this operation without public knowledge.

If any issues arose, I should not worry because the DPM would “back me up”. I asked Razak Baginda how he knew that the DPM gave me instructions when in Pekan.

Razak Baginda smiled and said the DPM had contacted him. Otherwise, how could I have met him today to discuss the related matters.

Based on my observations at that time, I think it was true that Razak Baginda was a special officer of the DPM. At first, I was quite reluctant but after the explanation from Razak Baginda, I agreed to carry out the covert operation as it was the same instruction given by the DPM in Pekan.

I was then told by Razak Baginda that this foreign spy must be executed while showing a sign of “cutting the neck” with his hand [the same gesture used by the DPM in Pekan] and to destroy the foreign spy's body using explosives.

I also told Razak Baginda that this was a big thing and I was not able to do it but Razak Baginda told me that this was a directive from the DPM because the DPM trusted me.

According to him, Musa had suggested my name to the DPM. I told him that this matter must be made known to my superiors at UTK but Razak Baginda told me this was a directive from the DPM. He said the operation had to be carried out secretly and most importantly, this covert operation must be carried out soon without public knowledge.

For certainty, I asked Razak Baginda again, if this directive was from the DPM and Razak Baginda replied, “Yes.”

According to Razak Baginda, he is the closest person to the DPM and had worked and cooperated with the DPM on national security. I believed the information given by Razak Baginda to me was the same as the information and instructions given by the DPM in Pekan.

I also believed that the covert operation to execute and destroy the foreign spy was directed by the DPM.

As a result of the discussions with the DPM and Razak Baginda, I believed that this was a covert operation and must be kept confidential from public knowledge for national security reasons.

After discussing with Razak Baginda at the Bangunan Getah Asli, I called Musa and told him the result of the discussions with Razak Baginda. At first, I was still reluctant to agree to this covert operation as I would be unable to execute it alone but Musa told me that I could find another trusted member to assist in this covert operation.

I then suggested Musa to inform my superior officer in UTK or at least my commanding officer (CO) because my instructions must come from my commanding officer. I also told Musa that he was not my “CO.”

Musa said the covert operation is not to be known to the CO as I was now under his (Musa's orders) and that his instructions came directly from the DPM.

At that time, I asked myself who would dare disobey the DPM's instructions, who was then also the minister of defence?

I felt guilty. Since this covert operation involved a threat to national security, I then decided to believe and adhere to the instructions of the DPM.

Musa reminded me to run this covert operation and report to him so that he can report it directly to the DPM. I called and asked Musa if there is a guarantee of protection arising from this covert operation and would they be resolved by Razak Baginda and the DPM in terms of confidentiality and security.

Musa said “yes” and reasoned that was why it was not necessary to tell my CO of this covert operation as the assurances covered confidentiality on all the security matters.

Because of these assurances, I became more confident with Musa's explanation. After reviewing the direct instructions I received from the DPM when I met him in Pekan and the encounter with Razak Bagiunda and having received the same instructions as the DPM’s instructions in Pekan, I agreed.

I also took cognizance of the detailed information on the foreign spy. I was convinced that this covert operation was important because it involved the security of the nation.

I sincerely agreed to carry out this covert operation for the sake of my beloved country.

On the same day, I found out that Sirul was a “standby driver” at the office. I contacted Sirul and waited for him at the side of the street opposite the Central Market [in Kuala Lumpur]. I went to Sirul's car and told him about the covert operation, including the meeting with Musa and the DPM in Pekan and the meeting with Razak Baginda and the telephone conversation with Musa earlier.

Sirul agreed to join the covert operation. We then went to Razak Baginda's residence in Bukit Damansara and later to Hotel Malaya to identify the target.

I contacted Razak Baginda, Musa and the DPM and informed them about Sirul’s involvement in this covert operation and obtained their permission.

The DPM told me “proceed.” I told Sirul that I am going to escort DPM to Hong Kong in the near future and if the target is identified and if he is ready to act, I would contact him. Sirul answered “Ok.”

I assigned the job of immediately obtaining explosives from the UTK armory to Sirul because of the urgency of this covert operation. With the target already in Kuala Lumpur, the operation could be carried out any time.

Sirul understood the ethics involved in carrying out such operations as he was a member of the UTK operations team, who was experienced in carrying out covert operations related to threats to national security.

Oct 19, 2006: While at the UTK office in Bukit Aman, I was instructed to prepare to travel as the DPM’s escort officer to Hong Kong. Along with seven other members, we made preparations. Weapons including guns and two armed magazines were handed over for customs and security declaration purposes. I packed my clothes and my team was instructed to be ready at any time to move.

The same afternoon, I was informed that the assignment to Hong Kong was cancelled and ASP Azani asked me to replace him as chief escort officer to the DPM the next day. At that time, the DPM was still outside Kuala Lumpur and the team of DPM's escorts were at RMAF Subang waiting for the arrival of the DPM.

After breaking fast with L/Kpl Rohaniza in Petaling Jaya, I went to the UTK office to pack my clothes for the purpose of escorting within the country. The group of DPM's escorts would be housed in Putrajaya that night.

When I was at the UTK office, Razak Baginda called me and told me that the “Chinese woman” with Bala was in front of his home in Bukit Damansara and asked me to act.

Since it involved a woman, I called L/Kpl Rohaniza to go to Bukit Damansara. I called Sirul and he told me he was going to Bukit Damansara. On arriving at Bukit Damansara, in front of Razak Baginda’s house, I saw a Chinese woman and an Indian guy standing beside a taxi.

At that time, I suspected that this was the Chinese woman or foreign spy that Razak Baginda had meant. It occurred to me that I had seen this woman during my official escort duty of the DPM and Razak Baginda at a condominium in London, where I saw both the DPM and Razak Baginda meeting her in the condominium lobby.

At that time, I was directed to wait in the lobby of the condominium where the three returned to the lobby of the condominium.The DPM, Razak Baginda, and the woman came out of the elevator. I continued to escort the DPM and Razak Baginda out of the condominium but the woman did not follow.

I was approached by the Indian man and he asked if I was Azilah from UTK. I was surprised how the Indian man knew my name and presence. The Indian man introduced himself as Bala and he told me: “This is the woman who has a problem with Razak Baginda.”

I contacted Razak Baginda for clarification if this woman with this Indian man called Bala was the foreign spy and the target for this covert operation. Razak Baginda said, “Yes”. Razak Baginda also reminded me not to talk much with the foreign spy because she is a good talker and convincing liar.

I took note of the reminder and tried to contact Musa but failed. I also tried to contact the DPM via the phone he handed to me but failed to contact him.

I called Razak Baginda again and informed him that I had tried to contact Musa and the DPM but failed because their phones were switched off. Razak Baginda instructed me to continue the covert operation as instructed by the DPM.

I contacted Sirul and informed him that the Chinese woman or target is in front of Razak Baginda’s house. Sirul said, “Ok” and told me that he was heading there. I waited for Sirul to arrive and when he arrived, I got out of the red [Proton] Wira car from which I arrived in .

I saw the Chinese woman and the Indian guy walking towards the car talking to each other. I told Rohaniza to sit in the rear seat with the Chinese woman. Bala closed the door while Sirul sat in the front passenger seat. When I wanted to make a U-turn, a Chinese man [taxi driver] came to ask for taxi fare and I gave him money.

We left Razak Baginda's house and arrived at a junction, Sirul asked to be dropped there because he wanted to take his own car and we agreed to meet at Bukit Aman.

I continued to Bukit Aman and on my way introduced myself as a police officer to the Chinese woman and advised her not to make a commotion in front of Razak Baginda’s house.

The Chinese woman told me not to be rough with her as she was pregnant. At that time, I assumed that was just a lie based on the information given to me by the DPM and Razak Baginda.

The Chinese woman agreed to heed my advice and I informed Sirul about it. Upon our arrival at Bukit Aman, I went to Sirul’s car and I ordered the Chinese woman to enter Sirul’s car.

Then I ordered L/Kpl Rohaniza to go back and I told her I would contact her to help send me to Putrajaya when I had completed my assignment.

I then contacted Razak Baginda that night and told him that I have brought the Chinese woman from the front of his house and I had also advised her.

Razak Baginda told me that the Chinese woman was dangerous and [asked me] to follow the instructions given by the DPM. Razak Baginda said that everything would be settled once the Chinese women is eliminated.

That same night, Sirul and I carried out the covert operation as instructed by the DPM based on the information provided through his aide-de-camp Musa and the special officer and his friend Razak Baginda.

Before the foreign spy was killed, she informed me that she knew it was “Mr. Razak” who sent me and Sirul to kill her. When I asked her who she meant by “Mr. Razak”, the woman replied: “Deputy prime minister.” The foreign spy also told me that she was pregnant.

Immediately after the covert operation, I telephoned Razak Baginda and informed him that the covert operation had been carried out and Razak Baginda replied, “Ok.”

I also tried to contact Musa and the DPM via telephone but both could not be reached. Razak Baginda told me that he would inform them.

Oct 20, 2006: I was on duty as the DPM’s chief escort officer and was waiting for the DPM at his official residence in Sri Satria, Putrajaya.

While waiting for the DPM to leave his house for the office, I chatted with Musa who told me that Razak Baginda had telephoned him and told him that the covert operation was carried out the previous night. Musa said he had informed the DPM who would see me later.

Musa told me that the DPM was glad about the successful operation which was carried out by me and Sirul. I kept silent because at that time, it was an open place and inappropriate to discuss secret matters. Musa acknowledged my response and reaction.

The DPM then came out of his house and went towards the car. The DPM smiled at me and shook my hands while saying: “Congrats” and “Thank you.” I just smiled and went straight into the car and headed to the DPM’s office. Upon arrival at the car park of the DPM’s office, we walked together towards the elevator at the DPM’s office.

The DPM spoke to me softly, asked me to maintain contact with Musa and I agreed.

After the DPM arrived at the office, Musa called me to his office and asked about the covert operation. I told him everything went well and that I had informed Razak Baginda.

I also told Musa that I had telephoned him and the DPM but both of them could not be reached. Musa told me that he had switched off his phone because he had a job to do with the DPM outside Kuala Lumpur and returned late.

I then contacted Razak Baginda and he told me that he had informed the DPM and Musa. I told him that Musa had told me the same that morning.

According to Razak Baginda, the DPM was glad that the covert operation had been completed and [told me] not to worry as Sirul and I had carried out instructions and that the DPM was in control.

Oct 21, 2006: During the time I was at Musa’s office, I was given RM2,000 to be divided among all the members of the DPM’s escort team.

The DPM also gave (Hari Raya) money to his staff. After completing my duty at the DPM’s office, the DPM, at his residence, gave Raya money to all UTK members who escorted him. The DPM then called me into a room and gave me RM300 as Raya money and he told me that he was satisfied with the covert operation that Sirul and I had carried out. The DPM congratulated me and was happy that the covert operation was completed while reminding me to keep it a secret. I agreed.

At midnight, Razak Baginda telephoned me several times while I was sleeping. When I woke up, I contacted him. Razak Baginda told me there was a commotion outside his house in Bukit Damansara and according to him, there were foreign women creating a disturbance and he had sought help from Musa and another police officer, SM Alias.

Razak Baginda requested me to come over but I was unable to go. I immediately called SM Alias and SM Alias told me there were foreign women trying to make noise in front of Razak Baginda’s house. They were also trying to get into his house and that police personnel in a patrol car had resolved the issue and the situation was under control.

Oct 22, 2006: I contacted Musa and told him about the commotion at Razak Baginda's house the previous night. Musa was aware as Razak Baginda had contacted him.

DSP Musa asked me if I had completed the covert operation as instructed as there was still a commotion by foreign women. I told Musa that Sirul and I had carried carried out the covert operation. I told him I had not made a mistake because it was Razak Baginda's man – Bala - who identified her at that time.

Sirul and I were not familiar with the foreign Chinese woman spy. DSP Musa was worried how this could happen again and how was he going to inform the DPM about the incident at Razak Baginda's house.

I told Musa to check and get clarification from Razak Baginda because the final identification of the target came from Razak Baginda and his own personnel.

During the time when I was escorting the DPM, I met Musa and he told me that the commotion outside Razak Baginda's house was caused by the foreign spy's friends who were under the impression that Razak Baginda had hidden the woman and the commotion was due to Razak Baginda refusal to come out [of the house].

Before the DPM got into his car to go to the office, the DPM told me not to be concerned as everything was under control and that the incident at Razak Baginda’s house was just a misunderstanding. I just nodded my head.

Upon arrival at the DPM’s office, Musa met the DPM in the office for about 10 minutes. Later, Musa called me to his office and told me that the DPM was informed by Razak Baginda and the DPM assured that there was nothing to worry about and everything would be fine.

If any matters arose, Musa told me to inform him so that he could refer to the DPM for further instructions. I just kept quiet. After Musa's explanation, I conducted DPM's daily routine in Putrajaya and Klang Valley for several days. Occasionally, I came across Razak Baginda at the DPM's office in Putrajaya and at the DPM's official residence.

Nothing strange or unusual happened while I was doing escort duties for the DPM until Oct 31, 2006 when Musa summoned me to his office.

Oct 31, 2006: While carrying out the DPM's escort duties in Putrajaya, Musa called me to his office and told me that he and Razak Baginda had been called to the Brickfields police station and had met my friend, DSP Idris Karim, to assist the inquiry about the commotion in front of Razak Baginda’s house.

Musa told me that DSP Idris required me to assist in the investigation and I replied, “Ok”. Musa also told me that he had informed Supt Mastor (my CO) that Idris wanted me to go to Brickfields to assist in the investigation regarding the incident at Razak Baginda's house.

Musa assured me there was nothing to worry about or be afraid of because the DPM would “back me up” as long as it does not involve the DPM's name. Musa also reminded me to keep his

involvement secret because the DPM is influential and would help anyone in any matter arising from the covert operation.

This was the assurance from the DPM so long as his good name was not implicated. This explanation from Musa caused me to suspect the truth of the covert operation which Sirul and I had carried out.

I received direct instructions from the DPM in Pekan and further information from Razak Baginda about the foreign spy's movements in Kuala Lumpur.

The last identification resulted in me and Sirul picking up the foreign spy in front of Razak Baginda's house. Musa's explanation that this confidential information should not be communicated to my CO in UTK caused some concerns.

I was confused and felt that I was being played out and used by the DPM, Razak Baginda and Musa. I tried to contact Sirul but failed.

That afternoon Khairi contacted me and instructed me to go to the Brickfields police station to assist in the investigation of a police report on the disappearance of a foreign woman and a commotion in Bukit Damansara.

He told me that Inspector Zaidi would take over my duties and I replied, “Ok”. I contacted Mastor, who was my commanding officer and informed him that I was required to go to Brickfields to assist in the investigation.

Mastor replied, “Ok” and asked me to make sure there was a replacement and he also told me that he was briefed by Musa about the need to assist in the investigation.

Later that afternoon, Zaidi told me he was instructed to replace me to escort the DPM in Putrajaya.

Nov 1, 2006: DSP Musa instructed me to go to see him at the DPM's office before going to Brickfields. I went to see Musa at his office. Musa greeted and hugged me. I wondered why DSP Musa hugged me because he had never hugged me before.

I tried to get clarification from Musa on what really happened in this covert operation. I saw Musa’s dejected face and he was sort of speechless.

Musa brought me to see the DPM. I told them that I would be going to the police headquarters in Brickfields to meet with Idris to assist in the investigation.

I was sure it was about the covert operation that Sirul and I had carried out. I was angry but I could control myself. The DPM told me everything would be settled and to follow the procedure.

The DPM said he would assist in whatever issues that arose and that it was important that the secrecy of the covert operation be kept secret without fail. This assurance given by the DPM gave me the confidence to go to Brickfields.

Before I went to Brickfields, I contacted Mastor and he informed me to report to him directly on any development.

When I reached the Brickfields police station, I met Idris where he was the head of the CID. Idris was busy at that time because there were police officers in his office.

When he saw me, he asked me to go to the office and we chatted as usual because I did not see him for some time. Idris contacted a police officer and said that I was in his office.

Idris told me that Musa and Razak Baginda had been called previously to assist investigation into the case of the missing Mongolian woman.

Idris told me that the investigation had been taken over by the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters. Shortly thereafter, an assistant superintendent named Tony [Lunggan] entered Idris' office.

Idris told me that Tony was the investigating officer of the case and he would take me to the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters. Before leaving, Idris hugged me and whispered to me to be patient and hoped this investigation would be completed soon and I would not have any problems.

I saw tears running down his cheeks. I shook hands with him and he told me that the DPM liked me and trusted me. I ignored those words as they could be a compliment or a sarcastic remark.

I contacted Mastor and he answered by asking me if the investigation had been completed and told me: “Hurry!” I told him I was going to the city police headquarters as the investigation had been taken over by D9 [serious crime division] Kuala Lumpur.

Mastor replied “Ok” in a disappointed tone. I then went with ASP Tony and another officer to the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters.

Upon arriving at IPK Kuala Lumpur, I was taken to an interrogation room and on the way, I passed by other rooms where I saw a fax machine printing a phone bill with the DPM's name.

Next to the fax machine I saw the bills of the phone numbers that I used. At that time, the gun that I used for escort duties was still in my possession. I was questioned by four or five detectives and an officer, ASP Samsudin. Shortly thereafter, I was brought into an identification parade with a one-way mirror.

I could vaguely see an Indian man – Bala - with DSP Gan coming in and going out. I knew that Bala was identifying me.

Investigations then resumed and various techniques [were employed], some were gentle and persuasive, but I knew all these was part of their job.

The feeling of anger was there due to the provocation from the investigation carried out by them and if I lost my senses and control, anything could have happened at that time. I held on to the assurance given by Musa not to implicate the good name of the DPM.

The interrogation was carried out from morning to evening. During the interrogation, I was silent and I just answered what was asked. After office hours, I was taken to a room of one of the D9 IPK Kuala Lumpur officers.

I saw Mastor and Khairi sitting with a Chinese offer, whose name I do not remember. Mastor stated that he was informed by Musa and asked if I would like to hand over any personal belongings to him. I handed over my wallet. I also stated that I had a gun and I saw their faces change. I handed over an armed magazine after I disarmed my gun before handing it over to Mastor.

When the gun was handed, I saw clearly the relief on their faces. When I turned back, there were many other officers outside the room.

When D9 officers, including Khairi, took my gun and left, Mastor whispered to me and told me not to mention the DPM in this investigation and that the DPM would assist me. He also told me to cooperate in the interrogation process so that the investigation could be completed swiftly. I agreed.

While I was in remand at the Sungai Buloh Prison, lawyer Zulkifli Noordin [former PKR MP] frequently came to see me and he promised to be my lawyer.

As a lawyer, he needed information on my case to prepare the defence for the trial in court. In the discussions in preparation of the trial, Zulkifli prepared a representation to the Attorney-General's Chambers for reduction of the charge from section 302 of the Penal Code to 304 of the Penal Code on the grounds that I acted on instructions from my superiors.

Zulkifli provided the defence of obeying “orders from superiors” for my case but I did not agree with that defence. At that time, the Ijok by-election was around the corner. Through the information which I received from my family and friends who visited me at the prison, I was informed that the situation was quite bad as Zulkifli had used my case as campaign material for PKR on the issue of the murder of a Mongolian woman involving the DPM.

I felt uneasy that Zulkifli had used my case as election campaign material and this involved the DPM. I had already been told by the DPM to keep it a secret.

For me, Zulkifli as a lawyer was responsible to maintain the confidentiality of his client’s instructions but unfortunately this did not happen. I was disappointed with Zulkifli’s actions.

For that reason, I discussed my case with other lawyers, among others, the lawyer of my prisoner friend, Sahari Usul, a lawyer named Kuldeep Kumar.

After being satisfied with my discussion with Kuldeep Kumar, I decided to appoint him as my lawyer and instructed him to write to Zulkifli to terminate his services.

During remand, Razak Baginda also told me not to appoint Zulkifli as my lawyer because he was a member of the opposition. He reasoned how the DPM could assist me if my lawyer was from the opposition.

Razak Baginda told me that I should appoint another lawyer and only then, the DPM could provide assistance in my case.

Razak Baginda also promised me when he was set free, he would help me and Sirul. At the same time, I had appointed Dato' Hazman Ahmad as my lawyer.

I state that during the course of this covert operation, I acted in accordance with the instructions of the DPM who was also the defence minister based on information provided by Razak Baginda and Musa.

I was convinced that this covert operation involved intelligence as well as threats to national security and a high degree of confidentiality was required.

I had no motive whatsoever to plan and kill the deceased except upon the instructions which I received as an operative officer acting as the assault commander of the PDRM [UTK] where I had been involved in various other national security and public order operations.

I also wish to state that I am conscious and matured enough to evaluate any assignment entrusted to me with regard to any national security operation, especially when it involves the life of a targeted person and threat to national intelligence.

I would have never carried out any operations if I had I not received instructions from my superiors.

Any information regarding this target would not have reached me unless it was given by Musa and Razak Baginda.

I would not have carried out this covert operation to kill and eliminate the deceased if it was not for the instructions from the DPM, who was also defence minister at the time.

I was also convinced by Musa that this covert operation was absolutely essential for the security of the country in which I, as a public servant, had in good faith carried out his instructions.

I am willing to give my life for my beloved country. I would not have got Sirul involved in this covert operation unless I had obtained permission from the DPM, Razak Baginda and DSP Musa.

If I am allowed to defend myself and give evidence under oath in any criminal or civil case involving the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu, I would give a detailed explanation of this case.

I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true, and in accordance with the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act, 1960.

The above is an English translation of Azilah Hadri's statutory declaration in Bahasa Malaysia. The English version has been edited for grammar and brevity.

Thursday, 12 March 2015

Altantuya case can only be reopened if there are other suspects, says former A-G

The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder investigation can only be reopened if there is evidence to show that others, apart from the two convicted policemen, have committed offences related to the murder, says former attorney-general Tan Sri Abu Taib Othman. – March 11, 2015.The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder investigation can only be reopened if there is evidence to show that others, apart from the two convicted policemen, have committed offences related to the murder, former attorney-general Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman said.

"Only then is the police obliged to reopen the case," he told The Malaysian Insider.

Talib said this in response to PAS Pokok Sena MP Datuk Mahfuz Omar's statement in Parliament today, urging police to reopen the murder investigation to establish motive.

Mahfuz , who recently visited convicted murderer Sirul Azhar Umar in Australia, said the motive for her murder was never established.

"He kept telling me he was ordered. The rest he spoke about is in confidence.

"I am not trying to defend a criminal, but the police must investigate who ordered the hit," Mahfuz said, while debating the royal address in Parliament today.

Talib said in criminal law, motive was helpful, but not necessary for the case.

"Motive is only helpful to determine intention of the killing," he said, adding that the murder case has been resolved with the conviction of Special Action Unit (UTK) personnel Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Sirul .

"The guilty have been brought to justice when the two cops were sentenced to death," he said.

Political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted of abetting in the 2006 murder.

Razak, once Altantuya's lover, was also confidante of current Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

The High Court in 2009 found the police commandos guilty of the crime, but the Court of Appeal set the two free after reversing the findings of the trial court in 2013.

Sirul was absent when the apex court in January overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal and sentenced the two to the gallows.

Sirul had left fled the country to Australia last October, but was detained by Immigration authorities there following a red alert by Interpol.

Allegations have been brewing since 2006 that Altantuya was ordered to keep quiet about purported kick-backs to high-level Malaysian officials over the US$2 billion purchase of two French Scorpene submarines when Najib was defence minister.

Najib has vehemently denied knowing or meeting Altantuya and the Malaysian government refuted allegations of any wrong doing in the submarine deal, which is the subject of an investigation by a magistrate in Paris. - March 11, 2015

Friday, 6 March 2015

Mahfuz: I paid for Sirul 'humanitarian' trip

PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar defended the “humanitarian trip” to reunite murder convict Sirul Azhar Umar with his mother Piah Ahmad saying it is out of the PAS leader’s own pocket.

Mahfuz had brought Sirul's mother, sister, Noriatin Umar, and four others with him on his trip to visit Sirul at the Villawood Immigration Centre in Sydney.

"I funded it myself," Mahfuz told Malaysiakini.

The mission has received a lot of flak, with many questioning why PAS was spending so much money to see a death row escapee convicted for the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Asked to respond, Mahfuz stood his ground and reiterated the humanitarian side of his trip for the sake of an elderly mother.

He also said his trip was aimed at seeking the truth, and to discover the motive behind the act in the nation’s most sensational murder case.

"The second (objective) of my mission is to find the motive, which was not revealed by the court... I want to find the truth," he said.

"However, I will find (the truth) not through Sirul, but through multiple sources," he added

Sirul himself has not discussed the murder during their meetings, Mahfuz said.

‘Not funding Sirul against Najib’

The Pokok Sena MP also brushed off allegations made by a pro-Umno blog that the opposition was funding Sirul, in hopes of getting him to purportedly blame Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak for the Altantuya murder.

"Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Daim Zainuddin, A Kadir Jasin have all clearly asked the prime minister to step down, so that has nothing to do with Sirul," he said.

Sirul, a former police commando, previously told Malaysiakini he had acted under orders and is mulling a tell-all interview with the Australian media.

Najib has however brushed off Sirul's claims as "utter rubbish".

Sirul and colleague Azilah Hadri have been sentenced to death for Altantuya’s murder, while Najib’s close associate Abdul Razak Baginda who had been charged for abetment in the murder, was released without his defence being called.

Tuesday was Piah’s second meeting with Sirul, after the teary reunion on Tuesday where the latter had the chance to enjoy his mother’s sambal ikan bilis.

Yesterday, Mahfuz said Sirul wolfed down beef rendang his mother cooked for him.

"He finished the whole tupperware we brought for him," said the PAS leader.

Mahfuz and Piah will be visiting Sirul daily until Friday.

Although there is a Interpol red alert on Sirul, Australian laws bar the country from deporting anyone facing a death penalty at their home country.

Wednesday, 4 March 2015

Azilah, Sirul not challenging RM100 million suit filed by Altantuya’s father, say lawyers

Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar Umar will not respond to the RM100 million suit filed by Altantuya Shaariibuu's father. The former police commandos was found guilty of Altantuya's murder. – The Malaysian Insider filepic, March 3, 2015.Former police commandos Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar who were sentenced to death for the murder of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu will not respond to the RM100 million suit filed by the victim's father.

Lawyers Datuk Hazman Ahmad, who represented Azilah, and Datuk Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin, who appeared for Sirul during the criminal trial, said they have not received any instructions from the two convicts on the civil suit.

"I have written to the legal firm (Karpal & Co) to inform them that I have no instructions to act for Azilah," said Hazman.

Kamarul gave a similar reply when asked if he would enter defence in the suit filed by Altantuya's father, Setev Shaariibuu.

Azilah is now being kept in solitary confinement at Sungai Buloh prison after the Federal Court allowed the government's appeal against their acquittal.

Sirul left for Australia before the apex court delivered the final verdict but was arrested in Queensland on January 20 and is being held at Sydney’s Villawood Immigration Centre following a red alert issued by Interpol.

Meanwhile, lawyer Ramkarpal who is representing Setev, said obtaining a default judgment was an option available to his client.

Setev filed the suit in 2007, a year after his 28-year-old daughter was murdered.

Both policemen did not enter their defence, unlike the Malaysian government and Altantuya's lover Abdul Razak Baginda.

Setev is seeking damages for "suffering, sorrow, as well as physical and mental anguish".

He filed the suit on behalf of his wife Altantsetseg Sanjaa and their two grandsons, Mungunsha Bayarjargal and Altanshagai Munkhtulga, who are minors.

The couple are guardians of Altantuya's children. The younger child suffers from a medical disorder which requires expensive treatment.

The suit was put on the back burner because the High Court wanted the criminal trial to be concluded first.

Razak Baginda, a close ally of Datuk Seri Najib Razak who was then the deputy prime minister, was initially charged with abetting in the murder but was later acquitted without his defence being called.

The government filed its defence saying that it could not be held vicariously liable because the two former policemen had acted on their own.

Razak Baginda, meanwhile, held the position that although he had known the victim, he denied any knowledge of the murder.

A five-man Federal Court bench chaired by Chief Justice Tun Arifin Zakaria on January 13 sentenced the two cops to death after allowing the government's appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision to acquit them.

Federal Court judge Tan Sri Suriyadi Halim Omar, who delivered the judgment, said the prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Suriyadi said there was overwhelming circumstantial evidence linking the two to the crime.

Evidence in court revealed that the Mongolian woman was either murdered by C4 explosives or was killed first and the remains destroyed on October 18, 2006, in the outskirts of Shah Alam, near the capital city Kuala Lumpur.

On August 23, 2013, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeals brought by Azilah and Sirul and acquitted them.

Four years earlier, High Court judge Datuk Zaki Mohd Yassin had found the two guilty and sentenced them to death. – March 3, 2015.

Tears flow over sambal bilis as Sirul meets mum

 
Tears flowed as murder convict Sirul Azhar Umar and his mother Piah Samad embraced each other at long last at the Villawood Immigration Centre in Sydney.

Bringing a taste of home through some sambal ikan bilis, Piah and her daughter Noriatin Umar spent two hours with Sirul, who fled a death sentence in the high profile murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.

"It was a sombre moment when mother and son embraced. Tears of longing flowed from this mother for her son far from home, whose fate is yet unknown," PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar said in a statement.

The sambal was cooked by Piah at the delegation's accommodation in Sydney.

When contacted by Malaysiakini, Mahfuz said Sirul remained stoic and dry-eyed during the initial embrace.

"It is the nature of men, and what more he is a police officer who was given special operations training to be strong, so he did not show any signs of grief.

"I was the one who felt moved seeing the two of them hug," he said.

Sirul, however, betrayed a "glimpse of sadness" when his mother was about to leave.

No photographs were allowed in the detention centre, which is actually a house which Sirul is placed on his own.

Mahfuz is accompanying Piah and Noriatin in what he terms as a "humanitarian mission" to reunite Sirul and his elderly mother.

They will be visiting Sirul again daily until Friday.

Altantuya murder not discussed

During their time together today, Mahfuz said Sirul did not discuss the Altantuya murder.

"We only discussed how his time in the detention centre was, we did not stray from my (humanitarian) mission," Mahfuz said.

Sirul previously told Malaysiakini he acted under orders and is mulling a tell-all interview with Australian media.

Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak however brushed off Sirul's claims as "utter rubbish".

Although there is Interpol red alert on Sirul, Australian laws bar the country from deporting anyone facing a death penalty at home.

Sirul and colleague Azilah Hadri are facing the hangman's noose, while Abdul Razak Baginda who was charged for abetment in the murder, was released without his defence being called.

Abdul Razak Baginda was known to be Najib's close associate.

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

Sirul's mum hopes Australia will protect son

Fugitive police commando Sirul Azhar Umar's mother has urged the Australian authorities to grant her son "full protection" from the dangers he faces at home.

"It is more (safe) in Australia than going back to Malaysia," said Piah, 74, according to Australia's public broadcaster, ABC.

Piah is in Sydney, Australia, along with her daugther Noriatin Umar, PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar, PAS treasurer Asmuni Awi and PAS foreign affairs spokesperson Dr Syed Azman.

The delegation is scheduled to meet Sirul tomorrow.

In a text message reply to Malaysiakini, Asmuni said the meeting is scheduled to take place at the immigration detention centre in Villawood, near Sydney.

"We just arrived (in Sydney) about ‎11.30am (8.30am Malaysian time) after a long haul flight.

"We have checked into a hotel and scheduled to meet Sirul tomorrow," Asmuni, who is serving as Mahfuz's lawyer.

The attempt to reunite Sirul with his mother and sister Noriatin was initiated by Mahfuz.

Sirul is believed to have fled to Australia in October after he won an appeal against his conviction for murdering Altantuya Shaariibuu in the Court of Appeal.

However, on Jan 31, the Federal Court overturned the decision and maintained the conviction of Sirul and Azilah Hadri and their death sentence.

Sirul is currently on the Interpol red list, which led to his detention by Australian authorities.

Australia has stated that the country is bound by law to prevent Sirul's repatriation unless Malaysia pledges that he would not be subject to the death penalty.

However, Sirul has recently communicated with Malaysiakini that he was subjected to the murder trial for merely following orders.

He is also mulling the possibilty of granting a tell-all interview with the Australian press.
 

Monday, 2 March 2015

'Humanitarian trip not to dig on murder'

PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar will not press murder convict Sirul Azhar Umar on details of Altantuya Shaariibuu's murder when they meet.
He said this is because the trip is a humanitarian one, to reunite the ex-police commando with his mother Piah Ahmad.
"This is a humanitarian mission for a mother who misses her son.
"If Sirul wants to tell me anything that will be up to him," Mahfuz told reporters at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport today.

To emphasise the humanitarian side of his trip, Mahfuz is also bringing along a pair of jogging shoes Sirul had asked for.

"The tagline for my trip is 'C4 Yourself' (See for yourself)," he quipped.

Sirul was sentenced to death for murdering the Mongolian national and blowing up her body using military grade explosives known as C4.

Piah and Sirul's sister, Noriatin Umar, 37, remained silent throughout the press conference.

Mahfuz, Piah, Noriatin and four others are flying to Sydney tonight on board a Malaysia Airlines flight to meet Sirul at an immigration detention center where he is being held.

They will be back in Malaysia on March 7.

No teleconference

When asked if they have received permission to visit Sirul, Mahfuz who is also Pokok Sena MP, simply said: "InsyaAllah (God willing)".

He also ruled out the possibility of holding a teleconference with the media, saying it would be too difficult to organise.

Sirul fled to Australia, which has laws against extraditing those facing the death penalty at home.

He was sentenced to death alongside colleague Azilah Hadri.

Abdul Razak Baginda, a political analyst and associate to now Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, was released without his defence being called for abettment in the 2006 high profile case.

Sirul earlier told Malaysiakini he acted under orders, and is mulling a tell-all interview with Australian media.

In response, PM Najib said Sirul's claim is "utter rubbish".

Sunday, 1 March 2015

‘AG has powers to commute death sentence'

Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail and the Selangor Pardons Board have the powers to commute convicted murderer Sirul Azhar Umar's death sentence to life imprisonment.

The difference between the two is that the AG can do it without waiting for an appeal from Sirul while the Pardons Board would first require Sirul or his representatives to submit an appeal.

A senior criminal lawyer who did not wished to be named said the matter need not be referred back to the Federal Court as proceedings at the apex court have already ended.

“The AG has the power to commute a death sentence to life imprisonment. He has that discretion to do this and it need not go through the court given that the Federal Court has already made a decision.

Yesterday, Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi (left) was quoted as saying that the government was considering commuting Sirul's death sentence to life imprisonment to facilitate his extradition.

The lawyer was asked to comment on the current imbroglio involving fugitive former cop Sirul - who together with ex-chief inspector Azilah Hadri - was sentenced to death by the Federal Court on Jan 13 for the murder  of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.
      
Same for Azilah, too

Sirul and Azilah had been earlier acquitted by the Court of Appeal after which Sirul left for Australia.

He was there when the Federal Court delivered its decision reversing the appellate court’s verdict. A warrant of arrest was immediately issued and Sirul was arrested by Australian police in Brisbane on Jan 21.

Sirul is currently being detained in an immigration facility in Villawood, Sydney where he has threatened to reveal to the international media who is actually behind the Altantuya murder.

Malaysian authorities are in a fix as their extradition request for Sirul cannot be entertained by Australia whose laws prohibit the deportation of persons facing the death sentence in their home countries.

“The other option for Sirul is, of course, for his lawyer to seek a royal pardon, in this case from the Selangor sultan,” said the lawyer.

The senior lawyer said if the government was considering commuting Sirul's death sentence to life, then the AG should also do the same for Azilah.

“It is only right and fair for Azilah to be given the same if Sirul's sentence is reduced,” the lawyer pointed out.

Saturday, 28 February 2015

Bogus Sirul's mum PAS event fools reporters

Journalists today were duped into thinking that PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar was holding a press conference at the PAS headquarters in Kuala Lumpur with fugitive former police commando Sirul Azhar Umar's mother.

It turned out that the WhatsApp message sent to reporters was actually a fake one. The origins of the message cannot be determined but it was circulated on a PAS media WhatsApp group.

A PAS headquarters staff said Mahfuz was in Alor Setar this morning and the latter had not called for any press conference much less for one with Sirul’s mum.

"I just called him. He is in Alor Setar and confirmed he never called for a press conference.

"He said an invitation would have been sent out earlier if he wanted to hold a press conference," said the staff who identified himself as Saripuddin Mohd Yatim.

Saripuddin's disclosure was met with groans and annoyed exclamations from reporters present who were blithely waiting for the press conference to start.

Monday announcement

In a statement later, Mahfuz said he will be leaving for Australia on Sunday (March 1) at 11pm.

"The media are invited to meet us at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) departure hall at Level 5 at 9pm on Sunday," he said in a statement.

The Pokok Sena MP had on Monday made attempts to initiate a conference call with Sirul. Numerous failed attempts later, Mahfuz cancelled the event and the ensuring press conference.

Sirul was finally reached only two hours later.

Mahfuz had then also announced a press conference would be held - most probably on Friday (today) - to announce the date he and Sirul's mother, Piah Samad (above), would leave for Australia.

"We will be there for a week to visit Sirul. A press conference will be held, most probably on Friday, to announce the date we are leaving," Mahfuz had said then.

Friday, 27 February 2015

Australian immigration minister mum on Sirul

Australian Immigration and Border Protection Minister Peter Dutton was tight-lipped when asked to comment on former police corporal Sirul Azhar Umar.

Dutton said privacy laws in Australia are quite strict and prevented him talking about individual cases.

"It is difficult for Australian ministers to comment on ongoing matters because of privacy laws and the desire not to prejudice any matter that might be under consideration," Dutton (left in photo) told reporters today.

He was asked for an update on Sirul Azhar, who is now under immigration detention in Australia where he fled to.

He was sentenced to death for killing Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Australia has no death penalty and its laws prevent the country from deporting people facing death sentence in their home countries.

Dutton was at the Home Ministry in Putrajaya to pay a courtesy call on the minister, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

Dutton also clarified that applications for the deportation of Sirul will be taken into account but the process might take awhile.

"The Australian government will take into consideration any applications that have been made and advice that has been provided.

"But there is a stringent legal process and rule of law that operates in relation to serious allegations against people within the Australian border, and that process now needs to take its course," said Dutton.

Teleconference okay

Asked to comment on the recent teleconference attempt with Sirul held by PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar (below), Dutton said it was a non-issue as Australian law allowed for such form of communication.

He, however, declined to comment on Sirul's immigration status.

"I don't want to comment on individual matters, but the general rule of law in Australia means that people, if they are subject to a visa, the government has the ability to deal with that visa, they have the ability to process matters according to the law.

"There are certain items and procedures, I will let officials comment in relation to particular matters, but there's nothing else publicly that I would like to add to it," the minister said.

While refusing to disclose specific details of his meet with the home minister, Dutton said Sirul’s matter had been raised by Zahid.

"Yes, the minister raised that issue with me and its an issue that he takes very seriously. It was raised during the course of our meeting," Dutton revealed without commenting further.

Thursday, 26 February 2015

March 7 demo will also demand for PM's ouster

The planned protest against Anwar Ibrahim's incarceration on March 7 will also demand for Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's resignation, said organisers.

The organisers have stated 12 reasons for this, including the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case with regard to former police commando Sirul Azhar Umar's latest revelations.

Calling themselves #KitaLawan, the group also wants opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim to be freed.

In statement, the #KitaLawan secretariat said last Saturday’s arrest during a protest at the same venue has not deterred them.

As planned earlier, the organiser added, similar protests will be held outside the shopping mall every Saturday until the demands are met.

Among others, #KitaLawan's 12 reasons for Najib to step down includes the 1MDB scandal, reneging promises to abolish sedition laws, GST implementation, weak handling of the economy, failing to stem corruption, failing to ensure free elections and abusing public institutions.

"If these issues are not resolved, the people of Malaysia will face more burdens.

"In view of this, we urge all Malaysians to take the first step towards rectifying the nation's problems by joining our rally on March 7 to demand that Najib step down," said the group.

The rally by #KitaLawan, a coalition of NGOs in cooperation with the youth wings of Pakatan Rakyat component parties, coincides with the March 2 Freedom rally organised by Anwar's family members.

March 2 Freedom slated for March 7 and 8 in Kuala Lumpur. Details of the rally have yet to be released.

Asked if a police permit was needed for the rally, #KitaLawan spokesperson Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad promised that the rally organisers will cooperate with the police.

"We would carry on with the rally no matter what and we will give full cooperation to the police," said Nik Nazmi, who is also PKR Youth chief and Selangor exco member.

Tuesday, 24 February 2015

Sirul: Saya selamat, tunggu masa sesuai beri kenyataan

Sirul: I have nothing to say... for now

The much-anticipated conference call today between PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar with fugitive police commando Sirul Azhar Umar proved an anti-climax, with Sirul saying he had nothing to say at the present time.

"I fully respect the authority of the Australian government, whose protection I am under, and I need to respect Australia.

"I do not wish to make a statement at this moment. However, I will try to make a statement at a more approprate time.

"I would also like to thank all Malaysian media for their coverage and I would to express my heartfelt gratitude to the Australian government, which has provided me with full protection, besides safe and comfortable accomodation," Sirul said.

Sirul also mentioned that he was waiting for Mahfuz to call him earlier. He then said 'Thank you' with a catch in his voice.

Immediately after this, Sirul disconnected the mobile phone line without taking any questions from Mahfuz or from the remaining reporters present.

The call came after repeated attempts earlier to reach Sirul for the much-touted conference call failed. Most of the media had already left when Sirul finally was reached at 1.28pm.

Mahfuz earlier made numerous attempts to hold his conference call with Sirul in front of the press.

Will visit Australia

The conference call was supposed to be held at 11.30am at the PAS headquarters in Kuala Lumpur. It was a packed event.

However, repeated attempts by Mahfuz to call Sirul's phone was futile. He gave up after about 40 minutes.

Mahfuz also showed the press his text message exchange with Sirul to show that the latter was ready for the conference call.

Following this, Mahfuz said that he would be trying to visit Sirul, with the latter's mother Piah Samad, 74, next week. Details are to be announced on Friday.

"We will be there for a week to visit Sirul. A press conference will be held, most probably on Friday, to announce the date we are leaving," said Mahfuz, who is also the Pokok Sena MP.

It is not certain why the calls failed. Mahfuz and his assistants had attempted to use several mobile network providers to contact Sirul, but to no avail.

Reporters at the scene also complained that they were experiencing abnormally poor network coverage at the PAS headquarters.

Ball at Sirul's feet

Previously, Malaysiakini had managed to contact Sirul who lamented that he was convicted based on circumstantial evidence and that he was merely following orders - which led to his encounter with Altantuya Shariibuu in October 2006.

Last month, the Federal Court upheld the conviction of Sirul and Azilah Hadri for the murder of Altantuya, a Mongolian national, and their death sentence.

Sirul fled to Australia before the Federal Court decision. As he is on the Interpol red list, Australian authorities are holding him at an immigration facility in Villawood, Sydney.

Australia has stated that it is bound by laws that prevent Sirul's repatriation, unless Malaysia promises not to impose the death sentence on him.

However, Malaysiakini has learned that several Australia media outlets are attempting to interview Sirul and are in contact with him.

 

PKR to lobby Australian gov't for Sirul interview

PKR will start lobbying the Australian government, via several Australian lawmakers, to greenlight a public media interview with Sirul Azhar Umar from the immigration detention facility he is being held at in Sydney.

Sirul has been sentenced to death in Malaysia for the murder of Mongolian translator Altantuya Shaariibuu in 2006.

The party has started engaging with several Australian lawmakers, who in turn will apply to the Australian government to approve such an interview and allow it to be broadcast.

"We are also in contact with an Australian lawmaker to try and meet Sirul personally in order to ensure his safety," PKR secretary-general Rafizi Ramli said today.

So far, PKR's Pakatan Rakyat partner PAS has been in touch with Sirul and his family.

Rafizi said that based on the party's understanding after several initial engagements with the Australian front, Sirul would be unable to make any media comments at the moment, until and unless such an attempt is approved directly by the Australian government.

"So far, at the forefront there is (Australian senator) Nick Xenophon (right). We also have good relationships with several lawmakers from the Greens and Australian Labor Party (ALP).

"But they can't be named at the moment as they are bound by their party regulations respectively. They will discuss with their party whips respectively," Rafizi said.

Rafizi said that the party expects some results for its lobbying efforts within "one or two weeks".

"For the next one or two weeks, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak will be having some sleepless nights," Rafizi said.

Najib had previously described Sirul's claims that the murder was committed "under orders" to be "totally rubbish."

Monday, 23 February 2015

We'll see what happens, Mahfuz says of Sirul plan

Whether Sirul Azhar Umar would be having a teleconference session will only be known tomorrow, said PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar.

The Pokok Sena MP said this was in regard to recent news reports which stated the Australian Immigration Department would not be allowing the former police commando to give an interview.

Last Friday, Mahfuz (left) announced that he would be holding a press conference via telephone with Sirul for 15 minutes at the PAS headquarters in Kuala Lumpur at 11.33am tomorrow.

“Only tomorrow we would know what happens. All this while I have spoken to him through the phone, and emailed him as well.

“After getting his prior agreement, that is when I made the announcement on the press conference,” he told Malaysiakini.

Sirul fled to Australia before the apex court’s decision on charging him and his compatriot, Azilah Hadri, for killing the Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu in 2006.

Sirul also told Malaysiakini he is considering the possibility of revealing all on the case after being approached by several Australian media organisations for interviews.

Sirul’s exposé that he was just acting under orders which was dismissed as “utter rubbish” by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak has also garnered more public interest on the case.

Sunday, 22 February 2015

IGP demam, patut jumpa doktor, saran Mahfuz





Australia may give green light to Sirul’s tell-all

Australia’s Immigration Department said that it has not ruled out the possibility of convicted murderer Sirul Azhar Umar giving tell-all television interviews provided proper application processes were met.
                          
"Generally, the department does not facilitate interviews within detention facilities for operational reasons," a spokesperson for Immigration minister, Peter Dutton, told Australia’s The Age newspaper.

The unnamed spokesperson was reported yesterday to have said that the department has not approved any television interviews with Sirul, a 43-year-old police commando who has been sentenced to death in Malaysia and is currently held at Sydney's Villawood detention centre.

According to The Age, Sirul would need top-level approval for a media interview in Villawood's maximum security Blaxland unit, where he has been held since his arrest in Brisbane, Queensland, on Jan 20.

Malaysiakini has earlier reported that Sirul was being approached by a number of Australian television stations for interviews to reveal who allegedly ordered him and his compatriot, Azilah Hadri, to kill Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu in 2006.

Both men were part of then deputy prime minister Najib Abdul Razak’s security detail and on Thursday, Prime Minister Najib rubbished Sirul’s claim that he was ordered by his superiors to kill Shaariibuu.

"Utter rubbish," Najib said when questioned by a Malaysiakini reporter during a Chinese New Year’s open house.

No motive mentioned

Numerous questions have surfaced pertaining to the murder case. Chief among them was that the prosecution and courts failed to establish a motive for the grisly murder.

Najib has repeatedly denied ever meeting Shaariibuu (right) and even swore in the name of God that he had nothing to do with the matter.

His former aide de camp, deputy superintendent Musa Safri, who reportedly told Azilah to help Razak Baginda on the night of the murder, was however not called to testify in the sensational trial.

This was one of the reasons cited by the Court of Appeal in freeing both Azilah and Sirul in 2012, only for its decision to be reversed by the Federal Court last month.

Azilah, who was present when the apex court delivered its decision, was immediately led to death row to await his execution while Sirul fled to Queenland.

The government had vowed to file an application to extradite him despite Australian law dictating that a person facing the death penalty in his or her home country cannot be sent back.

Sirul Azhar the ticking time bomb

Will convicted Altantuya killer blow up Najib? Wait for the Ides of March, says Ariff Sabri

FMT


Convicted killer Sirul Azhar’s sojourn in Australia, and a promised “tell-all” interview with the Malaysian press on Monday, has got tongues wagging about the kind of support he has obtained, and what he may say.

Does he have anything explosive to reveal? Will the former police commando blow up? Will Najib Razak, who has been indirectly linked to the woman, survive the Ides of March?

Questions have been popping up ever since it was revealed that Sirul had quietly left the country in the months before a Federal Court decision on his conviction and death sentence for the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu in 2008.

Fresh demands have been made for the Altantuya case to be re-opened, after Sirul told Malaysiakini last week that he had acted under orders when, with chief inspector Azilah Hadri, he carried out the killing of Altantuya, aged 28, by shooting her in the head and blowing up her body with plastic explosives.

Najib has pooh-poohed Sirul’s insistence that he was merely acting under orders (an aide to Najib was named in his original cautioned police statement but not at the trial) and that the real killer had not been punished. “Utter rubbish,” the prime minister had said.

Now the MP for Raub, Mohd Ariff Sabri Aziz, has asked in a speculative article on his blog whether Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s warning about the Ides of March would become a reality.

Ariff questioned why Najib had reacted so pointedly to Sirul’s remarks, as the Attorney-General had previously stated, before Sirul and Azilah were put on trial, that no others were involved.

“Let’s wait for March,” Ariff said. “Let’s see if Dr Mahathir’s warning comes about. Let’s see if Najib can survive after March.”

The “Ides of March”, a phrase from Shakespeare, refers to warning given by soothsayers to Julius Ceasar that senators led by Brutus were conspiring to assassinate him.

In a separate article, lawyer Haris Ibrahim speculates that Dr Mahathir may have helped Sirul to disappear to Australia, and could be the unseen hand behind Sirul’s willingness to reveal more about the murder.

Ariff makes no direct link to Mahathir as Haris does.

However, Ariff also speculates that Sirul may have been influenced by Australians to now speak up, as no Malaysians have access to him at the immigration detention centre where he is being held while awaiting the Australian government’s decision whether to extradite him as requested by Malaysia.

Dr Mahathir and his supporters have led a campaign against Najib and his wife Rosmah Mansor, especially lately with a barrage of criticism directed towards the government-owned investment company 1Malaysia Development Bhd, where Najib is an adviser.

Ariff reasons that Sirul’s reluctance to speak up about the order received from a high place during his trial may have been out of fear of “custodial death”, as speculated by Razak Baginda, a former policy analyst and associate of Najib, who was a co-accused but was acquitted without his defence being called.

“And Razak is an honourable man,” Ariff sarcastically points out, in the manner that Julius Ceasar’s friend Mark Antony referred to Brutus.

The Raub MP also speculates that Sirul may have met important people before he left for Australia and spoken about the events of the time.

For his protection, he may have prepared written depositions, attested to by people of impeccable integrity and credentials and Ariff asks if these will surface in March.

He reasons that someone under the threat of death would want to save his soul, and Sirul deserves to be given a chance.