Answer RM13mil Jewel-gate claim, Rosmah told

Muslims Burn About 1,200 cars on New Year’s Eve in France

Notice the Arabic Graffiti painted on one of the burned cars.

Act Now!

Interior Minister Manuel Valls said Tuesday that 1,193 vehicles were burned overnight around the country.  Clashes between police and offenders in the New Year’s Eve took place in the Muslim majority districts in the city of Strasbourg and Mulhouse.  About seven police officers were attacked New Years eve night.

Around 1,200 cars were burned by rioting Muslims on the New Year’s Eve in France, where the mass burning cars in the national holidays are kind of tradition among Muslim residents of the disadvantaged suburbs of immigrants.

In recent years, the celebration of the New Year and the Bastille Day (July 14) in France is often marked by mass burning cars as well. On the night of January 1, 2010, there were 1,137 thousand cars burned on the night of January 1, 2009 – 1,147 thousand were burned.

In the summer of 2010, the Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux made the decision to stop the practice of  counting  the demonstrators, as they claimed it only encourages the Muslim youths to commit such crimes .  The current Minister of the Interior said that “the French people should know the truth.”
The American media has mostly not reported on these incidents, and when they do rarely mention their background or religion.

Egypt’s nude protester Alia al-Mahdy to be stripped of citizenship?

Mahdy, who had previously posed naked on the internet in protest of Islamist rule in Egypt, said that she does not regret what she did. (Courtesy: Mahdy)

By Al Arabiya

An Egyptian activist filed a complaint to the general prosecutor calling for the citizenship strip of Egypt’s controversial Alia al-Mahdy, commonly known as the “nude poser,” for protesting naked against the country’s newly-adopted constitution.

The plaintiff, Mahmoud Abdel Rahman, accused Mahdy, who protested naked in front of the Egyptian embassy in Sweden, of tarnishing the image of Egypt and deriding religion. Abdel Rahman also called for placing Mahdy on a watch list so she can be arrested when entering Egypt.

In his charges, Abdel Rahman stated that Mahdy “wrote on her naked body statements condemning the constitution with the help of two female activists from FEMEN, an international women’s rights organization.”

He added that Mahdy then headed to the Egyptian embassy in the Swedish capital Stockholm and the three of them stood there stark naked.

“By standing there naked, she tarnished the image of Egypt and derided religion,” Abdel Rahman wrote in his complaint.

Abdel Rahman also provided the prosecutor with a CD containing a video of the protest.

Mahdy has said she has been receiving death threats since reports of her naked protests spread in Egypt.

“If I go back to Egypt, I will be put in jail and I might be killed if the current regime remains in power,” she told the Egyptian daily independent al-Watan.

Mahdy slammed Egyptian liberals who accused her of undermining their cause and giving Islamists a pretext to lash out at powers that struggle against the establishment of an Islamist-backed constitution.

“They have double standards. They claim they believe in freedom, but they never practice what they preach.”

Regarding the reason for her controversial protest, Mahdy said the new constitution encourages discrimination against women and will pave the way for stripping them of more rights.

Despite fears of arrest and assassination, Mahdy, who was granted political asylum in Sweden, wished to return to Egypt.

“I would like to continue my struggle for freedom from Egypt, but right now I will do so from abroad.”

Mahdy said she plans to write a book about her life and the lives of girls who faced a similar fate.

“I will also launch a project that helps women who are subjected to domestic violence and girls who wish to gain their independence from their families.”

Mahdy, who had previously posed naked on the internet in protest of
Islamist rule in Egypt, said that she does not regret what she did.

“It is not unlikely that I will protest naked again,” she added.

Answer RM13mil Jewel-gate claim, Rosmah told

PKR has demanded that Rosmah Mansor responds to claims by carpet trader Deepak Jaikishin that he had paid RM13 million to purchase jewellery for her in 2008 and 2009.

Deepak (right) is said to have claimed that the purchase of 19 pieces of custom-made jewellery from two firms in Hong Kong is part of alleged kickbacks to grease a land deal.

"It is of public interest that both Rosmah and Deepak come clean," PKR director of strategy Rafizi Ramli told a press conference at the party headquarters in Petaling Jaya today.

To back the allegation, Rafizi furnished documents that the party had obtained through intermediaries from Deepak.

He also pointed out that one document names Rosmah.

When contacted, an aide to Rosmah said he would have to check on the claim.
Malaysiakini has also contacted the jewellers involved and is awaiting their response.
'Probe warranted'

Based on preliminary checks, Rafizi said he believes the email communiques, invoices, account summaries and fund-transfer documents to be genuine.

The onus, he said is now on Deepak to furnish the authorities with original copies of the documents and other proof, so that an investigation can be carried out.

Deepak had told Malaysiakini earlier that he would lodge a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) later today.

Based on the documents, his companies, Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd and Carpet Plus Sdn Bhd, had paid for the jewellery.

"These are serious allegations," Rafizi said, noting that the documents and Deepak's claims warrant a probe.

Anticipating the possibility of a formal denial, Rafizi said it was not logical that the items were for Deepak’s use as “I have not seen (him) wearing rings and necklaces”.

PKR treasurer William Leong, who was present, urged the MACC to investigate the claim "without fear or favour" and prove that it is truly independent.

Failure to do so would show that it only investigates safe targets who have no political connections, he said.

He added that even without a report being lodged, the anti-graft body is empowered by its parent legislation to call in Deepak and compel him to furnish them with proof of his allegation.

Deepak denies giving Rafizi the 'diamond papers'

Businessperson Deepak Jaikishan has denied knowledge of PKR directorof strategy Rafizi Ramli’s allegations earlier today that he had purchased custom jewellery for the prime minister’s wife Rosmah Mansor.

“I put it on record - I have never given it (the documents) to him. I have not given it to an intermediary to give it to him. That much I can promise you,” he told a press conference today.

The carpet trader also denied having ever seen the documents disclosed by Rafizi today, nor that he has any contact with him.

However, he declined to comment if Rafizi's (right) allegations were factual, citing legal advice.

He said his lawyers would take “a day or two” to reply to Rafizi before continuing with his own exposés, and blamed Rafizi for derailing his plans to launch his book today.
“We want to see all the documents that he is talking about. We do not know what the documents are because he has (only) put one document there, and we want to see everything,” he said.

Responding to Rafizi’s challenge to explain the allegations, Deepak instead urged Rafizi’s party de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim to disclose the source and authenticity of the documents, and the latter’s intention of exposing them without his permission.

“The opposition leader should come forward. If he is really prime minister-material, he must have the courage. Don’t stand behind proxies (Rafizi), come forward.

“We will discuss this face-to-face, with or without the media,” he said.

No support from politicians

In addition, he expressed disappointment at politicians across the political divide for failing to support him, especially Anwar (left) for denying meeting him.

He claims that he had met with many senior government and opposition politicians, but all left him to fend for himself in his exposés.

“Everyone wants me to come forward and expose, but they hide behind other people. If you want to expose the truth, you must come forward... I have met them and they supported me.

“Today when the temperature has gone up to 200 degrees, everyone says, ‘Oh, there is 200 degrees heat, and a 350kph typhoon coming towards Deepak, stay away,’” he said, adding that he now has to rely on sleeping pills to fall asleep.

He said he was able to obtain legal representation for a hearing on Nov 29 because of the support, but is now alone again.

During the hearing at the Kuala Lumpur High Court, he was represented by PKR leaders N Surendran and R Sivarasa.

“I need some form of assurance. I need some form of consistency in which things are managed and exposed. Like today’s exposé by Rafizi, I honestly don’t know what he is talking about,” he said, while stressing that he is not interested in political mudslinging.

Police to ask for inquest into Nagarajan's death

The Cheras police will ask for an inquest into the death of odd-job worker K Nagarajan while in police custody on Dec 24.

“After getting the (autopsy) report from the hospital, we will refer it to the deputy public prosecutor to seek the inquest,” said Cheras police district chief ACP Mohan Singh.

He told Malaysiakini that the police are still waiting for the report from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Medical Centre.

“We cannot speculate about the cause of his death. We have referred to the hospital to conduct an autopsy to determine his cause of death.

“We are waiting for the report. Physically, there is no element of criminality,” he said, adding that the case is being investigated as one of 'sudden death'.
Nagarajan (left), 32, been detained on Dec 21 on suspicion of drug-related offences and was held at the Dang Wangi district police headquarters lockup. He was found dead three days later.

His family had expressed disbelief of police claims that Nagarajan had died of a fall.

Puchong MP Gobind Deo Singh has asked Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein to show the CCTV footage of the lockup.

Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee has urged the government to establish a Coroner’s Court in the wake of several deaths in custody.

Bar: Set up Coroner's Court on Nagarajan's death

The Malaysian Bar is urging the government to establish a Coroner’s Court, following the death of odd-job worker K Nagarajan while in police custody.

“Recent enquiries into deaths of persons that occur whilst in the custody of, or in or around the premises of, law enforcement agencies, have resulted in ‘open’ verdicts,” lamented Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee (left).

Therefore, he said a Coroners’ Act needs to be introduced, which would establish the position of a state coroner and coroners. Both would be appointed by the prime minister on the chief justice’s recommendation.

“The coroner would be responsible for supervising investigations by the police, ensuring that all relevant evidence is gathered, presiding over enquiries, and making findings,” he said in a statement today.

As for the state coroner, Lim said the position needs to be filled by a Sessions Court judge, who is more senior than the magistrates currently conducting inquests.

He added that the Act would also need a clearly stated aim about identifying the deceased and the circumstances of his death, as well as prescribing that only pathologists or medical pracitioners working under their supervision may conduct post-mortems.

“Although Chapter XXXII of the Criminal Procedure Code requires that all custodial deaths be investigated by way of inquest, no inquest is held in most instances.

“Every death in custody must be thoroughly and impartially investigated. Nagarajan’s death must not be relegated to a mere statistic,” Lim said.

Nagarajan was held for on suspicion of a drug-related offence on Dec 21 at the Dang Wangi district police headquarters, but was found dead in the lockup three days later.

Police had claimed that he had died of a fall, but family members who had found gashes and bruises on Nagarajan’s body have disputed this.

Lim also expressed concern that the police had not informed Nagarajan’s next-of-kin and the National Legal Aid Foundation (YBGK) about his arrest.

He said this is part of the protocol prescribed by the YBGK scheme.

Deepak says poorer from LTAT land deal, Ropiaah made more

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 2 — Senator Raja Datuk Ropiaah Abdullah got the lion’s share of the LTAT land deal through her company Awan Megah Sdn Bhd, which was contracted to build a defence facility, carpet dealer Deepak Jaikishan said today.

A unit of Boustead Holdings Bhd, owned by investment fund Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT), bought an 80 per cent stake in Deepak’s company Astacanggih Sdn Bhd for RM30 million as well as a RM130 million piece of land from Awan Megah last week.

It is not known what happened to the facility that was to be built by Raja Ropiaah’s company in exchange for the land.

“I think it’s unfair, it’s my land. I paid for it, I get pittance and she gets the lion’s share,” Deepak told a press conference here today.

“She got the appreciation (value) but I got nothing. I only got what I put in,” he said.

Deepak also noted that PKR’s plan to stop the deal by asking the Selangor government to sit on the land title transfer is ironic.

“If they had issued the land title then, I would’ve sold the land already by now,” he said.

Last Saturday, Rafizi alleged that a Boustead unit acquisition of Deepak’s company Astacanggih Sdn Bhd was an attempt to silence the businessman.

“This is worse than a bailout ... this is outright bribery to practically pay off and silence (Deepak),” Rafizi had told a press conference.

The PKR strategy director also accused Defence Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi of abusing his power by spending public money through government investment fund Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT), which owns Boustead, to acquire the loss-making property development company.

The politician added that if the recent allegations made by Deepak over the murder of Mongolian model Altantuyaa Shaariibuu had not been considered serious, it was unlikely that LTAT would have proceeded with the buyout.

Deepak recently also exposed an alleged deal between Awan Megah Sdn Bhd, the company owned by Selangor Wanita Umno chief Senator Datuk Raja Ropiaah Abdullah, and the federal government for a parcel of land involved in the acquisition by Boustead.

On Sunday, the Selangor government announced that it would scrutinise and possibly stop Putrajaya’s plans to purchase Awan Megah’s piece of land.

In a statement, Selangor Mentri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim’s political secretary Faekah Husin said the state has ordered the Selangor Land and Mines Department to examine the deal for any possible breach of legal procedures.

“We will not hesitate to stop them, be it a title transfer or pending transaction.

“The state government view these transactions seriously as it involves public money from the retirement fund of servicemen,” she said in the statement.

Ex-IGP thinks his exposé will bear fruit

MyWatch patron Musa Hassan is optimistic that the police force will eventually improve.
VIDEO INSIDE

PETALING JAYA: Former Inspector-General of Police Musa Hassan has come under attack from several quarters for his recent revelations about corruption in the force, political interference in its work, and criminal elements infiltrating it at the highest levels.

The government has ignored his allegations, and his successor, Ismail Omar, has dismissed his claims as “unimportant”.

However, the patron of anti-crime watchdog MyWatch said he remained optimistic that his exposes, which he claimed were aimed at improving the police force, would bear fruit.

“You shouldn’t be downhearted when people don’t want to listen,” he told FMT in an exclusive interview. “We still have to tell the truth.”

Musa spoke well of Ismail’s deputy, Khalid Abu Bakar, calling him a “capable leader”. But he dismissed a suggestion that he was ganging up with Khalid to overthrow Ismail.

When asked whether there had been attempts by the Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak or Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim to meet him, Musa said no political leaders had met him.

In a new year message to Malaysians, Musa said: “I hope this country will prosper, and there won’t be any political problems. I hope the police will improve themselves. People are now more aware of integrity. That’s a good sign. All agencies should be of high integrity, and avoid themselves from being corrupted, that’s the wishes of the people, and that’s my wish also.”

MyWatch chairman R Sri Sanjeevan, who was with Musa during the interview, said the organisation’s objective was to make Malaysia crime-free society, adding that this required good leadership in the police force.

Excerpts from the interview

The IGP reportedly said that what you said was not important. Don’t you feel like all your criticisms and efforts are falling on deaf ears?

Sanjeevan: No, no, no. We will keep on trying

Musa: We shouldn’t be downhearted when people don’t want to listen to us. We still have to tell the truth.

Sanjeevan: Changes don’t happen overnight.

Previously, you were saying that Ismail Omar should be tougher, he shouldn’t be a yes man and perhaps he should be standing up against this political interference that you have mentioned. What do you think of his leadership? Do you think that he should resign?

Musa: That is not for me to say. That is up to the minister, you know, because he calls the shots on whether a person continues or not.

Another thing is that I see Ismail [as] only a ceremonial IGP. He would only attend ceremonies. When there is real problem, he won’t be there. He would get his deputy to do it.

He should be involved as an IGP. If there is any problem happening on the ground, he should be there.

But Ismail Omar has been going down on the ground with high profile policing, together with top ranking people. Don’t you think that is very good?

Musa: Well you can go high profile policing. No doubt that is very good, but you only go at one time. What’s the follow up after that? It needs follow up. You don’t just go where people prepare for you to meet the public, meet them, shake hands with them. And then you go back. So what’s the follow up?

Was it different during your time? You stayed back?

Musa: Yes we stayed back. We had discussions with them, and then we had follow up. I gave my phone number, where they can call me.

On reports about Ismail Omar’s comments that these issues are unimportant…

Musa: How can he say that? As an IGP, if you say that the comment by the public are unimportant, there is something wrong. It means you did not take cognisance of the importance of what the public is saying.

So you are saying there is a lack of engagement even though they seem to be quite aggressive with the PR campaign.

Musa: PR campaign is different. But the actual engagement is important. How do you have dialogues with the people? I myself had dialogues in the districts … so I have first hand information from the people on the ground.

Doesn’t Ismail Omar do that?

Musa: That I don’t know. I’ve done my part when I was in service. Now he has to do his part.

Do you think that Tan Sri Khalid is a better person to lead the PDRM?

Musa: Tan Sri Khalid is a person who can make decisions. I think he can lead the police force.

Do you think Khalid should replace Ismail Omar? Or do you see other officers taking up that post?

Musa: I can’t say that. That’s up to the minister again. Of course, it is not me who put people there. It is up to the political masters.

OK, but you are saying Khalid is a capable person?

Musa: Yes he is a capable person.

More capable [than Ismail]?

Musa: No, but the way he speaks to the press—that’s how people want to see a leader. Talking, giving advice and all that.

Some have said he is more hands on.

Musa: Yeah, he should be hands on.

And Ismail Omar? Is he hands off?

Musa: I don’t know. You have to ask him.

Given what you have said about Tan Sri Khalid, I’m sure the public will speculate—is Musa Hassan coming up with MyWatch because he is ganging up with Khalid to overthrow Ismail?

Musa: No, no, no. I won’t be controlling the police. I won’t be influencing them. I will only assist in information so that the public would have more confidence. That’s why I don’t attend police functions.

Talking about influencing the police, a lot of your exposes so far have been about political interference, criminal elements infiltrating the force.

Musa: There are people close to people in power, who can influence certain police officers. They just go to certain police officers saying, “Oh, my boss wants this to be done.” That’s no good.

You are talking about politicians, or…

Musa: Anybody. Not only politicians [or] those who have influence. It can even come from the middleman of kingpins.

And you are saying this from information or this is just your guesswork, or…

Musa: Not information, through experience.

During your time, you’ve maintained, you’ve always turned down these interferences. Because people are saying, “What did you do during your time?”

Musa: Yes, I’ve turned them down. I’ve turned them down.

Can you tell us more? Now you’re giving us some teasers, some anecdotes, but where are we bringing this information to? What is your next plan of action? What is your end game? Are you planning to bring this up to court? What are the plans of MyWatch?

Musa: As I’ve said before, we will work together with the police, to take action, so that whoever is influencing the police won’t have any deals with the police.

You are still so very positive, but it seems that it’s very silent on the other end. The IGP, the PM, home minister. They have not actually addressed all these issues.

Musa: The members of the public have the right to know what happened to information they have given.

You have told people that this is happening, but there seems to be still silence from the government.

Musa: I don’t know why they are still silent

Sanjeevan: It used to be two people voicing out. Now we have a lot of Malaysians voicing. In time to come, police will respond to us.

You believe that?

Sanjeevan: Yes, I strongly believe that.

Tan Sri, have you ever tried to meet with Ismail Omar and talk about these issues that you are raising now?

Musa: Well, I don’t have the chance to talk to him because whenever we meet, even in public, he just walks away from me.

Why do you think that is so?

Musa: I don’t know. Maybe they think I am no longer relevant.

Greed? Muthu was talking about himself, says MIC

T Rajagopalu and VS Mogan defend their party MIC against a defector’s allegations.

SEREMBAN: Negeri Sembilan MIC officials have reacted angrily to defector M Muthu Palaniappan’s recent accusations against the party and its leaders, saying he was talking only about himself in his statements about greed for power and wealth.

Negeri Sembilan MIC chief T Rajagopalu and his predecessor VS Mogan, who is the party’s only assemblyman in the state, made their counter accusations in a special interview with FMT.

Rajagopalu and Mogan have alternated as state MIC chairman since July 2010, when the latter replaced the former, who had served in that capacity since September the previous year. Rajagopalu took back the chair in September 2011 following leadership changes at the national level.

Rajagopalu won the Jeram Padang state seat in 1999 and the Port Dickson state seat in 2004. He served as state executive councilor for two terms.

Mogan is a first-term state exco member. He is also national information chief for MIC.

FMT’s interview with the two was conducted following a similar interview with Muthu, who is now a PKR member.

FMT: Former Negeri Sembilan MIC chief Muthu Palaniappan said current MIC leaders work only to enrich themselves. Do you have a comment on this?

Rajagopalu: We have had many state MIC chiefs before and since Muthu. I can tell you that none of us, including me and Mogan, have worked for personal gain.

We never took any piece of land. Muthu worked under Menteri Besar Mohd Isa Samad. Ask Isa how much land was given to Muthu through cooperative and individual companies.

He also owned a block of shop lots in Jalan Rasah near Seremban General Hospital. He was the one who enriched himself, not any of us.

No state MIC chairman has accumulated as much wealth as Muthu. Muthu is a millionaire.

Muthu said MIC will be finished off in the coming general election, especially in Negeri Sembilan.

Rajagopalu: Muthu talked without facts. I can give you the facts.

I was the MIC election director for the 2009 Bagan Pinang by-election.

In the 12th GE, Barisan Nasional candidates lost at all Indian-majority polling stations in Bagan Pinang, which are Siliau Estate, Atherton Estate, Bradwall Estate and Sua Betong Estate.

However, during the 2009 Bagan Pinang by-election, BN won at all these polling stations. We brought back all the Indians votes, and yet Muthu says Indians won’t vote for MIC or other BN candidates. He talks blindly.

Since Najib Tun Razak became prime minister, he has been helping Indians a lot, especially when it comes to the education and business needs of the community. For 2012 alone, he has allocated RM12 million for Tamil schools in Negeri Sembilan. Actually, I requested this fund last year.

For next year, I have already requested RM16 million for Tamil schools in the state and I’m confident Najib will approve it.

Under the Tekun loan scheme, a total of 68 Indian individuals involved in small and medium size businesses have benefited this year, with loans given out to them totaling RM800,000. Negeri Sembilan MIC helped them get this loan.

The government allocated RM30 million last year and RM80 million this year for Indian businesses under the Tekun scheme.

Through Amanah Ikhtiar, we have also helped Indian ladies doing small businesses. We helped only 20 of them two years ago, but now we have already helped 140, all in Negeri Sembilan. And the numbers is increasing. Many of them have been approaching MIC on a weekly basis to get the loans.

We open our special welfare counter at the state MIC headquarters every Sunday. Once a month, welfare officers will come down here to interview the applicants.

With all these, do you think Indians will not support us?

What’s Muthu talking about? His claims and allegations are all wrong. We will win all the seats in Negeri Sembilan that we are contesting—one parliament seat and two state seats.

One of the things Muthu said was that MIC leaders had made millions of empty promises.

Rajagopalu: He is a frustrated leader. He is greedy for position. When you jump from one party to another,

no one has any respect for you.

Muthu is no longer qualified to talk about MIC. If you’re not in MIC, you have no right to talk about our party. We know how to take care of our party.

Anyway, I can tell more about what we are doing in Negeri Sembilan.

Three new Tamil schools are coming up very soon.

The Bukit Bertam Tamil School from Linggi will be relocated to Bandar Seri Sendayan on a 6-acre land, even though it currently has only four students.

Next we are going to relocate Perhentian Tinggi Tamil School to Taman Thivy Jaya at Rasah Jaya on four acres. This school currently also has only four students. The land belongs to Koperasi Pekerja Jaya, whose chairman is former MIC president S Samy Vellu. Samy donated this piece of land for the new building.

Another school that will be relocated will be the Ladang Sungai Sebaling Tamil School. It will move from Jeram Padang to Taman Desa Puteri in Bahau on a six-acre land.

Each of these schools will be constructed at a cost of RM2.5 million.

The new Labu Tamil School building has been completed. It cost RM1.9 million. Recently the government allocated RM268, 000 for the school to buy the necessary furniture. The new school building will be inaugurated on the 22nd of January, 2013.

Furthermore, at national level, MIC has managed to get millions in funds for temples throughout the country from the federal government.

Starting 2013, the government will allocate 500 places in government polytechnic colleges for Indian students who score only three credits in SPM. After they have received their diplomas, these students will be put on a fast track system, where they can further their studies for bachelor’s and master’s degrees at local universities. The government has assured places for them.

Recently, (MIC President) Palanivel announced that 1, 500 places have been allocated for Indians students in matriculation colleges.

These are not empty promises as Muthu claims, but the real thing. Maybe he is blind.

Mogan: Since he has already left MIC, why does he want to talk about MIC anymore? He should be talking about his new party instead of being a busybody.

We managed to get Najib to approve RM1 million for the construction of the Port Dickson crematorium and RM625, 000 to construct another crematorium in Jempol. We also have requested funds for a crematorium in Tampin, which I believe the government will approve without any problem.

MIC, through the government, is doing all these things for Indians in Negeri Sembilan. So I don’t see any reason why they will not support MIC.

Muthu alleged that MIC has not done anything about the low recruitment of Indians into the civil service.

Rajagopalu: When he was MIC vice president, what did he do?

Our prime minister has directed the civil service to increase the intake of Indians. There is an all out campaign by the civil service commission to encourage Indian participation in government jobs.

Mogan: Recently, the National Registration Department hired 107 Indians as temporary workers.

PKR says 49,000 stateless children denied proper schooling

The opposition party alleges that these children do not have proper papers to prove that they are Malaysian citizens.

PETALING JAYA: The schooling year for 2013 starts today and yet 49,000 Malaysian children cannot attend school because they lack proper papers which certify them as Malaysian, PKR vice- president N Surendran claimed today.

These children are deemed to be stateless due to the government denying them birth certificates and MyKads.

Surendran said this number is based on census data and population statistics, adding that his claim did not include figures in Sabah and Sarawak, which could be even higher.

He said the National Registration Department’s (NRD) statistics showed that in Sabah, there are about 50,000 eligible persons lacking proper documentation.

“It is shocking and inexcusable that children are being denied schooling in Malaysia. The Barisan Nasional government is aware of the problem but has failed to resolve it,” he said in a press statement.

He cited two orphans, Hari (12) and Haran (14), who have never been to school because the NRD has refused to issue them with MyKads.

“Until today, their homeless shelter continues to make attempts to enrol them in school,” he added.

Surendran highlighted two more cases in Perak and Johor involving nine-year-old Sri Darchatinni and 10-year-old Logeswaran Sarathrajan, who have been turned down repeatedly by the schools because they are officially not Malaysian citizens.

He is appalled at the actions of the government and saddened by the plea of concerned parents which seem to always fall on deaf ears.

“Although these children are Malaysians born here, they are forced to register as foreigners and have to pay additional fees,” he said, referring to stateless children who are allowed to enrol in school by kind school administrators.

He added that they face problems registering for exams and are not able to attend university.

Surendran cited the controversial case of 17-year-old, B Reshina, who remains without proper documentation despite a public campaign on her behalf last year.

“These children are citizens by operation of law by virtue of Article 14 of the Federal Constitution. It forbids any child from being rendered stateless in Malaysia,” he said.

He called upon Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, Education Minister Muhyiddin Yassin and the government to resolve this issue quickly without having more children to suffer.

Palanivel has nothing to fear

The MIC president is not a ‘tin kosong’ and his actions speak louder than his words, says a state MIC leader.
COMMENT

By P Gunaseelan

MIC SS2 Tengah Branch chairman S Padnmanagan once again has come out with baseless and wild accusations that the Public Complains Bureau under G Palanivel’s leadership in the Prime Minister’s Department has been idle.

He has also claimed that the department was active under the ex-deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Department T Murugiah. He went on to state that Palanivel has to learn from Murugiah on how to run the bureau.

Padnmanagan’s allegations are utter rubbish and his accusations are just to satisfy his personal vendetta against the MIC president. He should get his facts properly before he wants to discredit Palanivel.

Public Complains Bureau under Palanivel has performed above expectations. The bureau received a total of 13,356 complaints from January 2011 to December 2011 and out of this 13,045 complaints were resolved and 311 are still in action.

It received a total of 11,784 complaints for the period from January 2012 to November 2012 and 10,615 complaints were resolved while 1,169 are still in action.

Working with the NGO

Padnmanagan’s allegation that Palanivel does not have proper discussions and relationship with NGOs is also utter rubbish as the MIC leader conducts frequent dialogues and closed-door meetings with various NGOs.

Palanivel is very concerned of the development of the NGOs in carrying out their activities and he personally took special initiatives to speak to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to obtain funds for the NGOs.

Ever since he took over the MIC leadership, he has provided RM13,076,300 for 649 NGOs directly from the prime minister.

Both the above facts and figures clearly indicate that Padnmanagan is initiating a losing battle to discredit Palanivel.

Payment to Indian contractors

On Padnmanagan’s accusations that Indian contractors were not paid on time, I think it is best that he forward these queries to the Education Ministry and the Finance Ministry as they are the parties who handle the fund.

These ministries have to go through standard procedures before they could release payments to the contractors.

They have to be accountable that payments released are in accordance to job done.

At the same time the contractors should ensure that all the paperworks are in order to avoid any delays in payments. They should keep regular contacts with the relevant ministries to speed up the payments.

All the accusations made by Padnmanagan only proves that there is a desperate move to discredit Palanivel.

The MIC president is not a ‘tin kosong’ and his actions speak louder than his words. He is a religious and a no-nonsense person and his track record is clean.

There is no reason for him to fear anyone.

The writer is the President of Malaysian Public Service Association and the Welfare Chief of Wilayah MIC.

Kaum Cina hanya berminat dengan jawatan atasan, kata pengerusi SPA

PUTRAJAYA, 2 Jan — Salah satu faktor masyarakat Cina tidak berminat untuk memohon jawatan dalam perkhidmatan awam adalah kerana mereka lebih cenderung memilih jawatan atasan berbanding sektor perkeranian, kata pengerusi Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam Tan Sri Mahmood Adam dalam satu sidang media di Putrajaya hari ini.

Mahmood membentangkan laporan SPA bagi tahun 2012 merangkumi jumlah permohonan, perlantikkan dan tindakan tatatertib ke atas penjawat awam.

Sepanjang tahun 2012, hanya sebanyak 2,630 orang daripada masyarakat Cina dilantik mengisi kekosongan jawatan dalam perkhidmatan awam daripada jumlah keseluruhan 47,335 orang yang dilantik.

“Banyak faktor, sebagai contoh masyarakat Cina mereka lebih berminat dalam kumpulan atasan.

“Jika kita lihat jumlah pemilihan tadi iaitu kumpulan A yang terdiri daripada siswazah universiti, masyarakat Cina lebih fokus kepada bahagian itu kerana mereka mahu perlantikkan dengan cepat,” kata beliau selepas ditanya wartawan.

Walaupun terdapat peningkatan 11 peratus kaum Cina yang dilantik ke perkhidmatan awam jika dibandingkan pada tahun 2011, Mahmood berpendapat ia masih rendah dan pelbagai kempen perlu digiatkan bagi menarik mereka menyertai perkhidmatan awam.

“Sebagai contoh ialah kaum Cina tidak berminat di bahagian perkeranian.

“Jadi kita kena beritahu mereka kerana kerani juga memiliki gaji yang tinggi. Purata gaji kerani adalah antara RM1,700-1,800 yang bagi saya adalah satu angka yang besar,” terang beliau lagi.

Menurut Mahmood lagi, kumpulan Bumiputera masih lagi mencatatkan jumlah tertinggi dilantik mengisi kekosongan jawatan perkhidmatan awam pada tahun lepas dengan sejumlah 33, 427, peningkatan sebanyak 59 peratus (20, 976) daripada jumlah tahun 2011.

Manakala kaum India yang dilantik adalah sebanyak 2, 354 dan lain-lain kaum (Bumiputera Sabah dan Sarawak) sebanyak 8, 924.

Selain itu, SPA juga mencatatkan sebanyak 132 kes tindakan tatatertib manakala 563 kes rayuan tatatertib dicatatkan pada tahun 2012.

Pada Disember lepas, Senator Dr Ariffin SM Omar mengkritik Putrajaya kerana mengambil terlalu ramai Bumiputera berkhidmat dalam perkhidmatan awam dan mencadangkan supaya bilangan penjawat awam daripada pelbagai kaum ditambah.

Senator DAP tersebut turut memberitahu bahawa sikap kerajaan yang mengawal dan menguasai perkhidmatan awam adalah punca kepada berlakunya banyak rasuah dan penyelewengan dalam sektor perkhidmatan tersebut.

“Yang ditimpa rasuah ialah kerajaan bukan perkhidmatan awam yang terpaksa mengikut arahan kerajaan,” kata beliau.

Beliau turut menegaskan bahawa monopoli oleh sesuatu kaum dalam perkhidmatan awam bukan suatu corak pentadbiran yang baik tetapi hanya akan menimbulkan pelbagai permasalahan, di samping menyatakan cadangan lebih banyak pengambilan kaum lain dalam sektor tersebut boleh mengelak daripada gejala rasuah dan salah laku.

DSAI in East Malaysia

99-Day Countdown to 13GE – Make Corruption one of the top election issues for first time in 13GE

Yesterday, I suggested that the 100-Day Countdown to the 13th General Elections be computed from New Year’s Day and that all Malaysians take part in the daily countdown to the 13GE because of the historic significance and possibilities of this event.

On the 99-day Countdown to the 13th General Elections, I call on the 13.1 million electorate to make corruption one of the top election issues for the first time in 13 general elections in the past 53 years.

Last Saturday, Bernama carried the following report:

All BN candidates for the 13th general election have been found to be free of corruption and other crimes, BN secretary-general Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said today.

He said the candidates for the 222 parliamentary and 505 state seats had undergone screening by the police, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and Department of Insolvency to ensure that they were “clean” and did not have any problems.

Tengku Adnan spoke to reporters after presenting school aid and People’s Volunteer Corps (Rela) uniforms at a gathering of the people here where a durian feast was also held.

He also said that the background of the candidates was subjected to scrutiny to ensure that they were the people’s choice.

“We want the candidates to be whom the people want, not whom the party or individuals in the party want. We want candidates whom the people feel they can represent them,” he said.

This Bernama report which provoked widespread public scorn and contempt has provided proof, if proof is still needed, that the UMNO/Barisan Nasional is incapable of being serious or being trusted in any campaign against corruption.

Malaysians should not forget the 2004 general elections when the Barisan Nasional took out full-page advertisements confessing that the government was “corrupt and rotten to the core …with no aspect of life untainted by corruption” and urging the Malaysian electorate to give Pak Lah the mandate to be a “modern-day Justice Bao” in an “all-out war against corruption”.

Abdullah did not become a “modern day Justice Bao”. Instead, Malaysia sank further every year in the Transparency International (TI) Corruption Perception Index (CPI), falling from No. 37 in 2003 when Tun Mahathir stepped down as Prime Minister to No. 47 when Abdullah was forced out of Seri Perdana, to the four worst TI CPI rankings ever recorded for Malaysia all under Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s premiership from 2009 – 2012 (i.e. No. 56 for 2009 and 2010, No. 60 for 2011 and No. 54 for 2012).

Can Najib credibly claim that he could succeed where Abdullah had failed – to become a “modern-day Justice Bao” to conduct an all-out war against corruption and uproot a system “corrupt and rotten to the core …with no aspect of life untainted by corruption” as far back as two general elections ago in 2004?

Tengku Adnan’s statement as reported by Bernama last Saturday is testimony that the UMNO/Barisan Nasional have turned the serious issue of corruption in Malaysia into a mockery and a farce.

How could all the 222 BN parliamentary and 505 State Assembly candidates for the 13GE be screened and cleared of any corruption or other crimes by the MACC, the police and the Department of Insolvency when it is public knowledge that the BN and its member parties haver not yet finalised their 222 parliamentary and 505 State Assembly candidates?

What Tengku Adnan probably meant is that all the 222 BN parliamentary and 505 State Assembly candidates for the 13GE would be found to be free of corruption and other crimes as the MACC and the police would be required to issue “a blank cheque” of clearance for all of them.

This is final proof why the issue of corruption should become a top election issue in the 13GE as there can be no serious war against corruption so long as Putrajaya is run by UMNO/BN – as only a change of system with a Pakatan Rakyat government in Putrajaya can begin the long, arduous but necessary clean-up of the government and country.

Second RM100 School Aid To Start Jan 15

NILAI, Jan 2 (Bernama) -- The second RM100 school aid will be paid out starting Jan 15, said Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi.

He said the Ministry had issued a circular on the matter reminding the school authorities to not make any deductions for any Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) or other payments.

"The RM100 must be distributed to the students' parents. It's up to them if they want to use the money to pay PTA fees. The school has no right to deduct the money," he told reporters here Wednesday.

Mohd Puad had earlier visited Sekolah Kebangsaan (SK) Batang Benar, SK Sendayang and Tunku Kurshiah College (TKC) near here in conjunction with the first day of school for the 2013 session today.

Apart from the five million students in government schools the RM100 would also be distributed to students in government-aided, private, and religious schools.

The aid was announced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who is also Finance Minister, in the 2013 Budget for all primary and secondary students, following the first RM100 which was provided in 2012.

Meanwhile, Mohd Puad said 428,493 pupils attended Standard One in government schools nationwide this year and 15 new primary and secondary schools were opened this year.

On a separate development, he said SK Batang Benar was facing a shortage of classrooms due to an increase in Year One pupils, and the ministry would build six temporary cabin-classrooms to resolve the problem.

He said it was a short term solution and was expected to be completed in three weeks.

As for TKC which had moved to its new premises in Bandar Enstek, Mohd Puad said the ministry was willing consider its request to retain the old building in Jalan Tuanku Kurshiah, Seremban as a full boarding school for girls.

He said the matter was pending the decision by Education Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

India to charge five gang-rape suspects

Police to receive victim's postmortem results, with murder charges against adult suspects set to be filed on Thursday.
 
Indian police have said they expect to formally charge five of six suspects with murder in the death of 23-year-old woman who was raped on a moving bus in New Delhi last month.

The sixth suspect in the case that has outraged the country is under 18-years old. Under Indian law, juveniles cannot be prosecuted for murder.

Police ordered a bone test for the sixth accused to confirm his age, according to a police officer who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity as he was not authorised to talk to reporters.

Rajan Bhagat, New Delhi police spokesman, said on Tuesday that a charge-sheet in the case will be filed in court on Thursday.

Police also said they expected to receive the victim's postmortem report on Tuesday.

The suspects face the death penalty if convicted.

The physiotherapy student died last week in a Singapore hospital where she had been sent for emergency treatment after the crime in India's capital on December 16.

Ongoing protests

The case has triggered protests across India and raised questions about lax attitudes by police toward sexual crimes.

Protesters and politicians from across the spectrum called for a special session of Parliament to pass new laws to increase punishments for rapists - including possible chemical castration - and to set up fast-track courts to deal with rape cases within 90 days.

Thousands of Indians have lit candles, held prayer meetings and marched through various cities and towns to express their grief and demand stronger protection for women and the death penalty for rape, which is now punishable by a maximum of life imprisonment.

Authorities clamped down on demonstrations in the heart of the city before Christmas, but hundreds of people gathered for vigils on Monday nigh.

Protesters were seen sitting at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi's famous protest site and were shouting slogans.

More events were planned across the city.

Meanwhile on Monday, the Indian army and navy canceled their New Year's celebrations, as did Sonia Gandhi, head of the ruling Congress party.

Several hotels and clubs across the capital also did not hold their usual parties.

Only one man stands to gain from Bala's second SD

(Malaysiakini) COMMENT Private eye P Balasubramaniam affirmed his first statutory declaration (SD) on July 1, 2008. It was released at a press conference held at the PKR headquarters on July 3 that year. It was 55 paragraphs long.

A host of personalities were mentioned in this first SD. They are as follows (in the sequence they appear); Abdul Razak Baginda; private investigator Ang; murdered Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaaribuu; Rowena Abdul Razak; Suras Kumar; Dhiren Norendra; Najib Razak; Lance Corporal Rohaniza; Azilah Hadri; Sirul Azahar; Amy; DSP Musa Safri; DSP Idris and ASP Tonny.

The second SD, which emerged a day later, purposefully referred to only seven of those 55 paragraphs set out in the first SD.

These seven paragraphs (8, 25, 28, 49, 50, 51 and 52), were specifically identified and transcribed, after which their contents were traversed in the order they appeared in the first SD. In other words, these paragraphs were intentionally extracted from the first SD, repeated and subsequently retracted by denial. No other details appearing in that first SD were touched upon or even mentioned.

It may be an unfortunate coincidence that each and every paragraph so traversed in the second SD specifically bore reference to Najib. Nothing of all the other personalities mentioned in the first SD was referred to. Only the details relating to Najib were set out in the second SD and retracted.

This, by a very rudimentary analysis, would lead any reasonably minded person to surmise that the personality standing to benefit from this partial second SD retraction must have been the one whose name had been mentioned in the paragraphs referred to above. There is no logical reason why anyone else would have been interested.

This, by a simple process of deduction, indicates that Najib or someone close enough to him, entrusted or vested with an interest to maintain and preserve a favourable public perception of him, must have been instrumental in the organisation of a very rapid attempt to stifle what must have been perceived as a formidable threat to his pending ascension to the position of prime minister.

Who drafted the second SD?

Unfortunately, matters such as this, if done in haste, will eventually unravel.

It has recently emerged that a lawyer(s) other than M Arunampalam, was/were involved in receiving instructions to formulate a ‘U-turn' SD to be signed by Balasubramaniam . It had been assumed Arunampalam was instrumental in the drafting of this second SD, for the simple reason he turned up purporting to represent Balasubramaniam at that infamous press conference held in the lobby of the Prince Hotel in the morning of July 4, 2008.

However, as we now know, carpet trader Deepak Jaikishan has dispelled that assumption. He has said Arunampalam was there basically as a stooge for the person(s) behind these shenanigans. He was used by Deepak as a player in the entire plot.

It is no secret Arunampalam has been Deepak's lawyer in certain property transactions in the past. Appearing for someone he had never met and knew nothing about was probably a rather tenuous extension of the conveyancing portfolio he was handling for Deepak. Let's leave it at that.

We now know Arunalpalam didn't draft or prepare that second SD. Deepak has said so.
So who received instructions, ostensibly from Najib, or one or more of his cohorts, to do this?

Out of the 14,000 odd practising lawyers registered with the Bar Council, it can reasonably be assumed that only a handful of these lawyers would have had the privilege of being at the beck and call of Najib or his entourage.

We have now narrowed down the range of potential participants. This should assist the Bar Council in its endeavours to trace the culprit(s) who unilaterally and without instructions, drafted a false statutory declaration for my client to sign under circumstances in which the question of voluntariness remains highly suspect.

A revisit of the contents of that first SD is appropriate at this juncture.

Balasubramaniam's motives
What was the purpose of releasing that first SD? The answer lies in paragraph 54.

This paragraph sets out in detail the reasons why it was affirmed. These details need to be repeated so that the entire issue can be contextualised and afforded some prominence as it appears the wood is being ignored in favour of the trees and weeds.

The reason why Balasubramaniam affirmed this first SD was primarily due to the fact that the Altantuya murder trial was still on going at that stage and he was concerned that a massive cover-up was being orchestrated to detract from the most crucial question in the entire trial, the question which is still on everyone's lips until today... what was the motive for this murder?

Balasubramaniam's complaint was that although he had been called as a prosecution witness, he was not asked, during examination-in-chief or under cross-examination, fundamentally basic and pertinent questions relating to individuals who could throw some light on the chain of command.

Paragraph 54 of that first SD sets out the reasons why it was made and I reproduce those contents as follows: (Balasubramaniam said he wished to):

• State his disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya.

• Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there were individuals other than the three accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya.

• Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions' case.

• Emphasise the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police for 17 years, he was absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up his or her body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.

• Express his concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul, would not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

Explanation needed

As it turns out, Balasubramaniam's predictions were rather accurate to a large extent.

Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted at the end of the prosecutions' case and both Azilah and Sirul chose not to give evidence in their defence, which effectively meant they were not subject to cross examination. (They gave statements from the dock instead).

In other words, all three accused were spared the embarrassment of having to actually answer very relevant questions which would have revealed a motive for the murder. This is of course based on the assumption that the prosecution were ready and prepared to ask these very pertinent questions.

It is also rather intriguing to note that despite my making it very clear at that initial press conference that some of the material Balasubramaniam was alluding to was hearsay in the sense he was merely repeating what Razak Baginda had told him, these revelations have never been denied by Razak Baginda, despite having had every opportunity to do so once he had been acquitted.

What has been stated above is not intended to cast unwarranted aspersions on any individual involved but merely serves as an objective analysis of the circumstances surrounding this whole issue which I believe necessitates an explanation, especially in light of the recent revelations made by Deepak, all of which have yet to be disputed by the individuals named or implicated.

This reticence, unfortunately, only lends credence to these aspersions.

Deepak puts off book launch to Wednesday

Carpet businessman Deepak Jaikishan has postponed the launch of his tell-all book called 'Black Rose' - linking the wife of the prime minister, Rosmah Mansor, with the saga of murdered Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu - to tomorrow.

In an SMS message cancelling today's event, he said that the book publisher had yet to release copies of 'Black Rose' to him.
In addition to the launch of the book, Deepak also vowed to disclose evidence of alleged payment to private investigator, P Balasubramaniam to make him retract his initial statutory declaration linking Prime Minister Najib Razak to Altantuya.
Meanwhile, he is expected to go to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) office in Putrajaya in the coming week.
Deepak said the meeting was supposed to be held yesterday, but the officer who has been asking for him to come to the MACC was occupied.

“Hence, he has asked me to go there within this week. I will be informing the media further on this as I will require the media's assistance before going in.”

He however refused to divulge details on what he is being called for, only saying more will be revealed before he enters the MACC office.

Bala or land deal?

Deepak, who had previously acknowledged helping to get Balasubramaniam retract his first statutory declaration, had recently revealed that Najib had a role in the affair.

The MACC had then considered the Balasubramaniam probe closed unless there is new evidence.

The carpet businessman was also embroiled in a legal tussle involving his company Astacanggih Sdn Bhd, which was being bought over by a Defence Ministry agency last week after the case had been withdrawn from the Kuala Lumpur High Court.

Boustead Holding Bhd, the investment vehicle of Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (LTAT), an agency under the Defence Ministry, had announced on Bursa Malaysia that it would be acquiring an 80 percent stake in Astacanggih, owned by Deepak.

Boustead purchased the stake through its wholly-owned subsidiary Bakti Wira Development Sdn Bhd, and said it will also acquire 80.94 hectares of freehold land in Klang from Awan Megah (M) Sdn Bhd for RM130 million.

The legal battle follows Awan Megah having sought Deepak’s help when it failed to secure a land bond after it was tasked by the government through a privatisation project to construct the National Defence Research Centre (Puspahanas) in Putrajaya for which the Defence Ministry would pay the company RM27 million, and 223 acres or 90.24ha of land in Klang worth RM72.5 million.

Deepak’s Astacanggih had managed to secure and issue the RM72.5 million land bond for Awan Megah, where in return, 200 acres of the land will be given to him.

However, he has alleged that Awan Megah, owned by Selangor Umno senator Raja Ropiaah Raja Abdullah, has reneged on her end of the deal resulting in the legal tussle which was eventually withdrawn last week.

Threat of Direct Action against Hindus by Muslim leader in India. The Ghost of Jinnah is still alive in Owaisi brothers. Hindus must take this Challenge.

“In Hindustan, We (Muslim)are only 25 crores. You (Hindu) are 100 Corers. OK. You are much more than us. Remove Police only for 15 minutes, We will prove who have courage and who are powerful…..” Akbaruddin Owaisi, MLA of Chandrayangutta Assembly Constituency (All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen - AIMIM, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh in a communal meeting of 25000 fanatic Muslims at Nirmal, Adilabad, AP on 24-12-2012.

Kill the dog when it is mad. Hindus should take the Challenge.

~Upananda Brahmachari.
The Ghost of the partition devil Muhammad ‘Ali Jinnah is still alive in Owaisi brothers of Hyderabad. In a chilled wave of Islamic wind the tuberculous ghost of Jinnah needed some warmth of pure fanaticism for which the bloody swine Akbaruddin Owaisi gave a clarion call to finish off 100 Hindus by 25 crores of Muslim in the same way of direct action as it was done by Jinnah on 16th August 1946.

Actually this Owaisi Sultanate of Hyderabad are always posed a anti Indian- anti Hindu stand from the beginning as they belong to Rajakar Sunni clan. Rajakar is a para-military force of fundamental Muslims against non-Muslims to hold a supremacy of Muslims in the dominion. The MIM (Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen) and now AIMIM (All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen) generated by this Owaisi family were never patriotic in the Bhartiya (Indian) context or they never wanted to stay in Indian Republic. They always opted the anti Indian politics and stand to materialize a two nation theory or the Momin-Kaffir division under Islamic communalism.

The party has roots back to the days of the princely State of Hyderabad. It was founded and shaped by Nawab Mahmood Nawaz Khan Qiledar Golconda of Hyderabad State by the advice of Nawab Mir Osman Ali Khan the Nizam of Hyderabad and in the presence of Ulma-e-Mashaeqeen in 1927 as a pro-Nizam party. then it was only Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) and the first meeting was held in the house of Nawab Mahmood Nawaz Khan his house name was “Touheed Manzil”. The MIM advocated the set up of a Muslim dominion rather than integration with India. In 1938 Bahadur Yar Jung was elected President of the MIM which had a cultural and religious manifesto soon acquired political complexion and became aligned with the Muslim League in British India. He soon rose to be the supreme and unquestioned leader of the MIM and imparted a new militancy to it.

On December 26, 1943, Nawab Bahadur Yar Jung delivered an important speech in the All India Muslim League conference Lahore. In the first half of his speech he laid stress on the struggle for Pakistan. In the second half he talked about the creation of Pakistan.

The Razakars (volunteers), actually a Muslim paramilitary organization, was historically linked to the MIM. In total up to 150,000 Razakar soldiers were mobilized to fight against the Indian Union and for the independence of the Hyderabad State against Indian integration and to force its eventual merger into Pakistan instead. After the integration of the Hyderabad state with India, the MIM was banned in 1948 till 1957. The MIM president and Razakar leader Qasim Rizvi was jailed from 1948 to 1957, and then he was left on the condition to go to Pakistan, where he was granted asylum. Pakistan and ISI have a direct link with MIM as the strategists opined for various reasons altogether.

From that legacy these Owaisi brothers Assaduddin and Akbaruddin are maintaining a crude and staunch Islamic subversiveness in Indian politics arousing a venomous communal feeling. Sultan Salahuddin Owaisi, father of Owaisi brothers took complete command of AIMIM and thus refereed as Salar E Millat (The Commander of the Community) or simply Salar. In 1960, during Salahuddin’s leadership AIMIM made full fledged entry in politics by capturing the Mallepally seat of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation by defeating M. M. Hashim of Indian National Congress and MIM never saw behind until it spread its communal influences all over Andhra Pradesh by making his elder son Assaduddin as Member of Parliament of Hyderabad Loksabha Constituency (2009) and younger son Akbaruddin as Member of Legislative Assembly from Chandrayangutta Vidhansabha Constituency (2009).

With this increased political power, the Owaisi brothers have been raping the Hindu sentiments by various methods like banning Hindu festivals like Ramnavami and Hanuman Jayanti in Hyderabad, promoting Cow slaughter in Hindu areas, giving shelters for Communal Rohingya Muslims in Hyderabad, giving effort to demolish Bhagyalakshmi Temple at Charminar and now targeting a communal riot betweeng Hindu and Muslims by fomenting hot-headed Muslims in various places throughout India. Moreover, these two Owaisi brothers are playing a key role to unite all the Muslim political force under an Umbrella of Political Jihad in India aiming to another Pakistan or to make India as DINIA (the pre Pak name as proposed by the Pak originators at Cambridge). From Assam Riots to Raja Academy Violence in Mumbai or collaborating with Popular Front of India and All India United Democratic Front of Baddaruddin Azamal, these brothers come to the spotlight of present Muslim politics in India. The communal Politics of Jinnah remain still alive in the subversive and Jihadi politics of these Arab-Pak prompted Muslim leaders and Islamic parties in India.

On 24th of December 2012, Akbaruddin crossed the limit ultimately by calling a Direct Action against Hindus near Adilabad (AP). In his disparaging remarks against Hindus in a hate speech, the sitting MLA of Chandrayangutta told that Muslims would need just 15 minutes without the police to show 100 crore Hindus who is more powerful.

In a complaint filed against the MIM legislator, an advocate Kashimshetty Karunasagar said he had stumbled upon YouTube uploaded hate speech made at a public meeting at Adilabad on December 24, about 300 km from the city.

The VII additional chief metropolitan magistrate after admitting the petition said the matter will be heard on December 31.

Akbaruddin, who is the younger brother of MIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi, said Hindus have so many gods and goddesses, and every eight days, there are new gods coming up. “We knew about Lakshmi, but who is Bhagyalakshmi, we are not aware,” Akbar said referring to the Bhagyalakshmi temple abutting the historic Charminar.

The MIM had been complaining against a semi-permanent structure over the Bhagyalakshmi temple and finally parted ways with the Congress party after weeks of violence. Akbaruddin’s hate speech saw a huge buzz created on the social media all day and it was also trending on Twitter.

“Inflammatory speech by MLA Akbaruddin – Remove police for 15 mins, We will finish off 100 crore Hindus,” tweeted television commentator and interviewer Karan Thapar, which was re-tweeted by journalist and columnist Swapan Dasgupta.

Meanwhile, a group of civil rights activists have strongly condemned Owaisi’s speech.

The group comprising Mazher Hussain, Hamid Mohammed Khan, M Mandal, Asghar Ali Engineer, Swami Agnivesh, Mahesh Bhatt, Irfan Engineer, Sandeep Panday and Ram Punyani said in a statement, “Such obnoxious speeches and statements divide society, vitiate peace and lead to conflicts and riots that eventually result in deaths and destruction causing untold hardships to the poor of all communities. Coming from a responsible member of Legislative Assembly makes it even more detestable and unacceptable.”

BUT SUCH EYE WASHING FROM RIGHTS GROUP OR INACTION FROM HINDUS CAN ONLY AGGRAVATE THE PROCEEDINGS OF PAKISTAN FURTHERMORE IN BHARAT. MANY A PROCESS COULD NOT HINDER THE REALTY OF PAKISTAN IN THE HISTORY OF STAMPEDING THE SACRIFICE OF MAJORITY HINDUS IN THE STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

THE CASE IS IN THE HON’BLE COURT. BUT, WE HAVE NOT NOTICED ANY SIGN OF REPENTANCE OF AKBARUDDIN IN ANY WAY. YES WE, HINDU SAMAJ AND ORGS ARE ACCEPTING YOUR CHALLENGE. YOU CRITICIZED NARENDRA MODI FOR GOING TO HYDERABAD. YOU AKBARUDDIN COME TO GUJARAT, WE WILL DO NOTHING TO YOU. I AM REQUESTING SRIMAN RAJA BHAIYA (SHRI RAM YUVA SENA), TO INVITE MODIJI TO VISIT HYDERABAD PROMPTLY. AND NARENDRA MODIJI MUST ENTER INTO HYDERABAD TO PROVE HYDERABAD AS A PART OF BHARAT AS IT WAS DONE BY DR SHYAMAPRASAD MOOKHERJEE TO RETAIN KASHMIR IN INDIA,

WE KNOW THAT KILLING A MAD DOG SOMETIMES MADE A NECESSITY, THOUGH PATHETIC. HINDUS HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE TO SLEEP DOWN A MAD DOG BARKING AND ATTACKING US VERY DANGEROUSLY. SUPPORT US. SATYAMEVA JAYATE. JAI SHRI RAM. JAYATU JAYATU HINDU RASHTRAM.

Seven aid workers gunned down in northwestern Pakistan

Seven aid workers have been killed in northwestern Pakistan. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack.

Local officials said the victims, who were gunned down as they left a children's community center where they worked, were Pakistani citizens. Six of the victims were women, at least five of whom worked as teachers at the community center, while the seventh was a male doctor. The attack occured in Swabi district, about 75 kilometers (45 miles) northwest of the capital, Islamabad.

"They were on their way back home when unknown gunmen on a motorcycle opened fire on their vehicle," the Swabi district police chief told the AFP news agency. "Six women and a man have died. The driver is injured. We are investigating the motives of the attack," Abdul Rahsid Kahn added.

Last month, nine health workers taking part in a national polio vaccination drive were gunned down in a series of attacks in northwestern Pakistan and Karachi. Suspicion fell upon Pakistani Taliban Islamists, but they denied carrying out those attacks. The United Nations children's fund and the World Health Organization reacted by suspending their work on polio campaigns, which the Taliban have repeatedly denounced as being a plot to either sterilize or spy on Muslims.

The head of Support With Working Solution, the charity whose workers were killed in Tuesday's attacks, said that while the motive remained unclear, a link to December's attacks was not out of the question.

"Our charity centre is located close to a government facility offering polio immunization and it is possible that the attackers mistakenly thought our staffers were health workers," Javed Akhtar told the DPA news agency.

pfd/kms (Reuters, AFP, dpa)

British Muslim lawmaker loves Israel

It is somewhat rare these days to hear outright statements of support for Israel from the upper echelons of British politics. It is even more rare to hear such statements from British Muslims.

Earlier this month, support for Israel was voiced from both quarters, in the form of one man: Conservative MP Sajid Javid.

Javid, along with a number of other Conservative MPs, was asked to attend and speak at the December 13 Conservative Friends of Israel "business lunch", one of the main pro-Israel annual political events in Britain.

Despite his Muslim background, or perhaps because of it, Javid stole the show by telling his audience that were he to move his family to the Middle East today, Israel would be the only country he would consider.

Israel "is the only country in the region that shares the same democratic values as Britain," said Javid. "Israel is the only free country in the Middle East." Even for Muslims.

Javid continued by pointing out that while Britain has a long and proud history, "we are mere beginners compared to Israel, a nation that is governing itself in the same territory, under the same name, with the same religion, and the same language as it did 3,000 years ago. Now that's what I call longevity!"

Find mystery lawyer behind Bala’s second SD first, Bar Council told

Lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu has lashed out at the Bar Council for allegedly dragging its feet over the identity of the mystery lawyer. Pictured here is Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee, who has said a probe into the matter is already underway.

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 1 — The Bar Council was today chided for dragging its feet over the identity of the mystery lawyer behind P. Balasubramaniam's controversial second sworn statement into the 2006 murder of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu, despite the number of clues at its disposal.

Lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu, who is acting for the former private detective, told The Malaysian Insider the Bar Council should speed up its investigation on the high-profile case that had previously been linked to several high-ranking government officials and resurfaced recently in the run-up to the 13th general elections.

“I'm suggesting the Bar Council was a little hesitant in investigating this matter,” he said when contacted today.

The Bar Council, a statutory body regulating the professional conduct of some 14,000 legal practitioners in the country, has said it is investigating the possibility of misconduct in the drafting of Balasubramaniam’s second statutory declaration (SD), which contradicts his previous sworn statement made just a day earlier over the death of the Mongolian translator hired to assist in the government's acquisition of two French submarines several years ago.

“They can pass the matter to the disciplinary board for action,” Americk said, adding that the Bar Council could of its own volition push for an inquiry panel to be set up.

A cloud of mystery has been hanging over the identity of the lawyer who had drawn up Balasubramaniam's second SD, dated a day after his first on July 3, 2008, regarding Altantuya’s 2006 murder, for which two elite police commandos have been convicted and are facing death sentences.

In an open letter published earlier today, Americk said M. Arunampalam's role as the lawyer who had drafted Balasubramaniam's second SD had been dispelled by well-connected businessman Deepak Jaikishan who is also in the centre of the controversy surrounding Balasubramaniam’s two SDs.

He said the clues were all assembled before the Bar Council to act and advised the body to check out lawyers who had previously worked for the politicians named in Balasubramaniam's (picture) SD to question them in an inquiry.

He pointed that only a handful of lawyers would have access to a prominent personality that had been named in Balasubramaniam's SDs out of the 14,000 members of the Malaysian Bar.

Americk pointed out that Deepak had cleared Arunampalam - whom the carpet dealer had engaged to handle his property transactions previously - as a likely candidate for drafting the second SD.

“We have now narrowed down the range of potential participants. This should assist the Bar Council in its endeavours to trace the culprit(s) who unilaterally and without instructions, drafted a false statutory declaration for my client to sign under circumstances in which the question of voluntariness remains highly suspect,” he had said in his open letter today.

Americk had previously called on the Malaysian Bar president Lim Chee Wee to “organise a simple email to be sent to all members of the Malaysian Bar requesting that the member(s) responsible for drafting that 2nd SD do the right thing and make themselves known, as it appears innocent parties may be publicly falling victim to the blame game and finger pointing which has emerged since Deepak’s revelations, to which I certainly do not subscribe”.

In a harried press conference on July 4, 2008, Balasubramaniam, accompanied by M. Arulampalam, came out to withdraw his first SD, where he negated the contents of the first statement, claiming it had been signed under duress.

He then produced a second statement, which he claimed later in 2009 had been prepared by another lawyer, whom he did not meet with and who did not consult him when drafting the document.

A former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) adviser, Tan Sri Robert Phang, had publicly named Tan Sri Cecil Abraham, who sits on the graftbuster’s Operations Review Panel (PPO), as the lawyer in question in a news conference last month.

Three others have raised the issue publicly – carpet merchant Deepak Jaikishan, former minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, and a political activist, Haris Ibrahim.

Haris, a former lawyer, has written in to the Bar Council demanding it investigate the lawyer for misconduct.

But Americk, who said he knew Abraham personally and described him as “someone who possesses such an ingrained sense of dignity, integrity and professionalism”, pointed out there was no concrete evidence to show the latter had drafted Balasubramaniam’s second SD.

Americk stressed that the former private investigator had not met the person who drew up the second statement that he claimed he had been coerced to sign and was clueless as to the person’s identity.

The MACC’s PPO also spoke out on the issue yesterday, saying that Abraham had not been part of the review team that had closed the investigation file on Balasubramaniam’s SD.

“PPO had agreed with the decision by the deputy public prosecutor to stop investigating the case on grounds the main witnesses’ testimonies were not supported by any other witness and the credibility of the main witnesses were disputable.

“PPO wishes to state that one of the panel members, Tan Sri Datuk Cecil Abraham was not present and was not involved in that meeting,” Tan Sri Hadenan Abdul Jalil, chairman of the eight-man MACC operations review panel, said in a media statement last month.

May the force be with us in 2013

We cannot dismiss what has happened during and before 2012 and just hope that 2013 will bring a change to all the horrors of an abusive government and their arrogant leaders.
COMMENT

Here we go again! Amidst the fun and frolics of this last festive season of 2012, I will do, as many of you are wont to do, the toting up of my plusses and minuses for the year that just ended.

In the past I have always done this furtively knowing that in the end the minuses will surpass the plusses, the negative overwhelms the positive because I am, after all, human and a creature of habits.

I always take the road less travelled instead of the one already travelled by others. I am determined to do things my way rather than the ways of the many.

…but I digress.

Let us get back to that plusses and minuses of 2012. Not for me but for our beloved Malaysia!

For me there is not one single issue or incident that stands out from all the others. How can I think of 2012 when what has happened before 2012 overwhelms me?

Memali, Bank Bumiputra, May 13, 1969, the ISA, the PPA, Ops Lallang, Anwar Ibrahim, Eric Cheah, Tun Salleh Abas, Altantuya, Teoh Beng Hock, Aminursayid, Kugan, Ahmad Sarbani, Noramfaizul Mohd Nor, Khir Toyo, PKFZ, NFC, cronyism, money politics, corruption dan lain lain.

These are the thoughts that stay in my head and overwhelm all the plusses and minuses of 2012.

All of them have one common thread linking each and every insidious event, names and incidents – Umno.

And to most of these events, one name keeps recurring ad nauseam: Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

A litany of abuses

How then can I think only of 2012 when I should really reflect on how is it that our beloved nation has come to this:

Malaysia called the most corrupt country for business.

Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhari, the blue-eyed poster boy-cum-business tycoon touted by Umno as its richest bumiputera corporate figure and the 7th richest man in Malaysia, has a combined debt of RM34.3 billion.

Our Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak thinks that swearing in the mosque absolves him from complicity in a murder and the need to subject himself to the process that he insist his nemises, Anwar Ibrahim be subjected to: that of the Malaysian judiciary.

The murder of suspects in custody by PDRM.

The propensity…nay the greed, of Umno and Barisan Nasional politicians (serving and retired), their families, cronies and friends and acquaintances to acquire insane wealth and the arrogance for them to insists that it is their God given right to do so.

There are more, but I ask you this: How can I think only of 2012 when I have witnessed almost every noble value and aspirations that I hold dear for my country and of it’s leaders disintegrate before my very eyes?

Disintegrate because of the failure of Umno and the failure of the government that Umno has led for over 50 years to do what is right for the common good of our people, our country and our future.

No, we cannot ignore all this and just think of 2012.

Leave 2012 with dignity

We cannot dismiss what has happened during and before 2012 and just hope that 2013 will bring a change to all the horrors of an abusive government and their arrogant leaders.

Yes go into 2013 we must. But we go into 2013 burdened by the abuses of a government that has failed in its duty of care for its own people.

So let us leave 2012 quietly, softly and quickly and leave behind an annus horribilis for all of us….except maybe for Shahrizat Abdul Jalil and the family of NFC infamy!

So my friends, let us leave 2012 with dignity and have within us all this noble passion to do what is right for our common good.

To care for those that are less fortunate than us. To give dignity in life for the aged.

To give hope of a better future for our children and to take our long suffering nation out of debt, out of its servitude to the greed of Barisan Nasional politicians and into a 2013 of change.

In closing I bid you Happy New Year and may the force be with you! Salam.

CT Ali is a reformist who believes in Pakatan Rakyat’s ideologies. He is a FMT columnist.

Majlis Peguam didesak untuk cari peguam misteri di belakang SD kedua Bala

KUALA LUMPUR, 1 Jan — Majlis Peguam hari ini dikritik kerana melengah-lengahkan waktu untuk mendedahkan identiti peguam di belakang kontroversi akuan bersumpah kedua P Balasubramaniam (gambar) mengenai pembunuhan warga Mongolia Altantuya Shariibuu pada tahun 2006, walaupun sudah banyak petunjuk diberikan.

Peguam Americk Singh Sidhu yang mewakili bekas penyiasat persendirian itu memberitahu The Malaysian Insider Majlis Peguam harus mempercepatkan siasatan kes berprofil tinggi itu yang sebelum ini dikaitkan dengan pegawai tertinggi kerajaan, muncul semula menjelang pilihan raya umum ke 13 yang akan berlangsung tidak lama lagi.

“Saya mencadangkan Majlis Peguam keberatan untuk menyiasat kes ini,” katanya apabila dihubungi hari ini.

Majlis Peguam sebuah badan mengatur tugas profesional hampir 14,000 pengamal undang-undang negara berkata mereka sedang menyiasat kemungkinan berlakunya salahlaku dalam merangka akuan bersumpah (SD) kedua Balasubramaniam yang bercanggah dengan akuan bersumpah pertama dibuat sehari sebelum itu, tentang kematian penterjemah kerajaan untuk rundingan membeli dua kapal selam Perancis beberapa tahun lalu.

“Mereka boleh serahkan perkara tersebut kepada badan disiplin untuk tindakan,” kata Americk sambil menambah Majlis Peguam dalam bidang kuasanya boleh menubuhkan panel inkuiri.

Misteri menyelubungi identiti peguam Balasubramaniam yang merangka akuan bersumpah kedua bertarikh sehari selepas SD pertama pada 3 Julai 2008 berkenaan dengan pembunuhan Altantuya dimana dua anggota polis Unit Tindakan Khas (UTK) yang telah dijatuhkan hukuman bunuh.

Dalam surat terbuka awal hari ini, Americk berkata peranan Arunampalam sebagai peguam yang merangka SD kedua Balasubramaniam telah disanggah oleh Deepak Jaikishan yang juga terlibat di sekeliling kejadian berkaitan kedua-dua akuan bersumpah Balasubramaniam.

Beliau mengatakan kesemua petunjuk sudah diserahkan kepada Majlis Peguam untuk bertindak dan menasihatkan badan tersebut untuk menyiasat peguam yang sebelum ini bekerja dengan ahli politik dinyatakan dalam akuan bersumpah Balasubramaniam dan untuk menyiasat mereka dalam inkuiri.

Beliau menegaskan hanya segelintir peguam yang mempunyai akses kepada personaliti penting dinamakan dalam SD Balasubramaniam daripada 14,000 ahli Majlis Peguam.

Americk menjelaskan Deepak sudah membersihkan Arunampalam - dimana penjual karpet itu pernah menggunakan khidmatnya untuk menguruskan urusan hartanahnya - sebagai seorang yang disyaki menulis SD kedua itu.

“Kami sudah kecilkan pelbagai orang yang berpotensi. Ini seharusnya membantu Majlis Peguam untuk berusaha untuk mengesan orang yang secara unilateral dan tanpa menerima arahan, merangka akuan bersumpah palsu untuk ditandatangani oleh anak guam saya dibawah keadaan ianya dilakukan secara sukarela adalah sangat mencurigakan,” katanya dalam surat terbuka hari ini.

Americk sebelum ini mendesak Presiden Majlis Peguam Lim Chee Wee untuk “menghantar emel mudah kepada semua ahli Majlis Peguam meminta agar mereka yang terlibat merangka SD kedua Balasubramaniam untuk melakukan perkara benar dengan mendedahkan identiti kepada umum oleh kerana mereka yang tidak terlibat mungkin dituduh atau dipersalahkan seperti yang berlaku selepas pendedahan Deepak dimana sudah pasti saya tidak setuju.”

Dalam sidang akhbar tergesa-gesa pada 4 Julai 2008, Balasubramaniam yang ditemani oleh Arulampalam muncul untuk menarik kembali akuan bersumpah pertama, dimana beliau menafikan kesemua isinya dan berkata beliau dipaksa untuk menandatanganinya.

Beliau kemudiannya keluar dengan kenyataan kedua dimana beliau dakwa kemudian pada tahun 2009 disediakan oleh seorang peguam yang beliau tidak pernah jumpa dan tidak berunding dengan dirinya apabila merangka dokumen itu.

Bekas penasihat Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (MACC) Tan Sri Robert Phang secara terbuka menamakan Tan Sri Cecil Abraham yang duduk sebagai Panel Penilaian Operasi (PPO) badan sama dalam sidang akhbar bulan lalu.

Tiga lagi telah menimbulkan isu ini secara terbuka - peniaga karpet Deepak Jaikishan, bekas menteri Datuk Zaid Ibrahim dan aktivis politik, Haris Ibrahim.

Haris yang juga bekas peguam telah menulis surat kepada Majlis Peguam menuntut siasatan terhadap peguam tersebut kerana salahguna kuasa.

Akan tetapi Americk yang mendakwa mengenali Abraham secara peribadi dan menggambarkannya sebagai “seorang bermaruah, berintegriti dan profesional” menegaskan tiada bukti konkrit menunjukkan peguam tersebut mengarang SD kedua Balasubramaniam.

Americk menegaskan bekas penyiasat persendirian itu tidak pernah berjumpa dengan peguam yang merangka kenyataan kedua kerana dipaksa untuk menandatangani dan langsung tidak mengetahui identiti orang tersebut.

PPO SPRM juga mengatakan semalam bahawa Abraham tidak terlibat dengan pasukan penilaian untuk menutup fail penyiasatan SD Balasubramaniam.

PPO bersetuju dengan keputusan penolong pendakwaraya untuk menghentikan siasatan terhadap kes ini dengan alasan saksi utama kes ini tidak disokong oleh saksi lain dan kredibiliti saksi utama disangsikan.

“PPO mahu menyatakan salah seorang ahli panel Tan Sri Datuk Cecil Abraham tidak hadir dan tidak terlibat dalam mesyuarat tersebut,” kata Tan Sri Hadenan Abdul Jalil, pengerusi kepada lapan orang ahli panel PPO dalam kenyataan media bulan lalu.