Share |

Monday, 19 April 2010

Why does Kamalanathan defend Perkasa – By Helen Ang of the Center for Policy Initiatives.


Why MIC Hulu S’gor candidate defends Perkasa
Helen Ang
P. Kamalanathan is the BN candidate standing in the Hulu Selangor by-election. In his interview with Malaysiakini, he was quoted as saying: “Perkasa has its own role. It is strengthening its (Malay) race, its language and its religion, and we (MIC) are also doing the same by strengthening our race, religion and language.”
Kamalanathan – known as Kamal – was also quoted as saying that Perkasa’s role is about “empowering” the Malay race and it does not trample on the rights of other races.
It is pertinent that his statement should be viewed in juxtaposition with what Perkasa patron Dr Mahathir Mohamad said Friday at the commemoration of Mara’s 44th anniversary.
Responding to reporters’ questions after his keynote address, Mahathir said he sees no time frame for putting a stop to the NEP and that the other communities did not lose much when the policy was introduced in the 1970s.
Mahathir is saying that all the assistance and opportunities being given to Malays under NEP is not robbing Peter to pay Paul. His view is not much different in its syllogism from Kamal’s that Perkasa does not seek to impinge on the rights of others.
Doing well elsewhere and at home
Despite what Kamal may say, the truth is that MIC has miserably failed the Indians. When the Tamil underclass is so poor, in what way can that be construed as the race having been enfranchised?
Indians are strong men and women; it is Malaysia’s apartheid that has weakened them over decades of discrimination. Comparatively, those of the diaspora in the advanced countries have done well for themselves.
Given the Ketuanan Melayu agenda of denial, it is not surprising that Najib Razak’s erstwhile aide Nasir Safar should comment that the Indian forefathers come here as “beggars”, and that Perkasa should rally to his defence and urge that Nasir be given a chance to explain the context of his remarks.
Contrary to the opinion “pergilah kau tertindas”/“what rubbish to say that you’re oppressed” by former Perlis mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin (see Youtube here, 4:42-4:48) when commenting on the Hindraf demonstration – the truth is, Indians are.
Asri’s views (3:57 onwards) are quite typical of Malay prejudice: “Sangat hina kehidupan mereka di dalam negeri mereka. Kasta pariah ini telah dibawa oleh Inggeris ke dalam negara kita … kehidupan yang mereka nikmati di sini seribu kali ganda lebih baik daripada … negara merempat, naik bas, tak pakai baju, tak pakai seluar.”
Translation: “They led an abject life in their country (India). This pariah caste were brought to our country by the English … the life they enjoy here is a thousand times better than in … that suffering country where (people) board the bus not wearing shirt, not wearing pants.”
This truth is that today, Tamil Nadu – where our Indians originated from – possesses the third largest economy (year 2007-2008) among the states in India, and experienced a double-digit GDP growth rate of 12.1% during this period. It is the most industrialized state in India and ranked third for attracting FDI.
Chennai (formerly known as Madras and the capital of Tamil Nadu) houses India’s largest IT park; this IT hub was ranked “the top metropolitan city to invest in Asia Pacific”. Tamil Nadu was ranked 9th region to invest in 2008, and is India’s leading software exporter.
Malaysian Indians would likely be better off if their ancestors had not emigrated here.
Mara shuts out others
As part of the BN election goodie bag, Kamal said “the prime minister and the deputy prime minister have made a decision to build a UiTM” in Hulu Selangor.
Although the establishment of Mara in 1966 predates the NEP which began in 1970, the federal agency is nonetheless a major provider of Malay privileges. Mara administers the Mara Junior Science Colleges, Mara Colleges, Giatmara, Mara Skills Training Institutes, Mara Higher Skills Training Institutes, Mara Infotech Institutes, Mara Professional Colleges and Mara scholarships including for students abroad and post-grad studies.
The reality is that these Mara entities are all over the country and allocated ample funding each year.
Compared to Mara’s largesse, Kamal’s rhetoric – “Is it wrong for me to want to memperkasakan Tamil schools?” – rings hollow. He misses the irony of dangling the UiTM carrot when Mara has an almost single-race enrolment.
How many Muslim converts?
As to Kamal’s ingenuous contention that the pursuit of Malay supremacy does not trample on the religious rights of other races, I would argue otherwise. Not only does it trample, after stomping there’s spitting too for good measure as the Shah Alam cow-head episode discerned.
MIC’s claim that it has strengthened Indians in their religion should be put to the test with a challenge to reveal the number of Indians who have converted to Islam.
From anecdotal evidence, they have been converted in droves and the side-effects coming to public attention in the form of the bodysnatching and child custody cases teetering between jurisdictions of the syariah and civil courts.
Among the fresh converts, you see plentifully women in their badly tied tudung whose hair has barely shed the scent of jasmine.
Ponder on this: An apple doesn’t call itself a ‘non-orange’. One of reasons why the non-Malays convert (then at least they wouldn’t be non-Muslims) could be to eliminate one half of the two-pronged negation occasioned by diminishment when one is officially a ‘non’.
Mandores to Umno
Kamal, who is MIC information chief, has a professional background in public relations. Judging from the scorn poured on Indian ethnicity, it’s evident that the Indian image problem has not been rectified. Kamal has done a poor job as MIC info chief.
The lowly position of the Indian is even reflected in differentiated word use. A search through Utusan’s archives reveals a pattern on the word ‘jenazah’ to refer to Muslim, and ‘mayat’ for non-Muslim corpses, e.g. “menuntut mayat Prema a/p Elenchelian” but “menuntut jenazah Abdul Muiz Mokhtar”.
Language when referring to bereaved families is also different: “mengucapkan takziah kepada keluarga Allahyarham Edi Rizal Ramli” but “seorang ahli keluarga si mati Kugan Ananthan”.
And only last week, on April 8, brothers si mati R Satchithantham and R Logeswaran were killed by police in Taiping. Their mayat were riddled with bullets.
Indians are clearly the object of police profiling when they make up 95% of victims shot dead by Polis Diraja Malaysia (Indians form only 8% of the Malaysian population), according to the Human Rights Party estimate for year 2009 to present.
Yet Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali infamously refutes the contention that ethnic minorities are second class citizens. “Don’t talk shit, you see don’t talk shit. I, I, I repeat don’t talk shit,” he said in his much-viewed Al-Jazeera interview.
Perkasa is playing a zero sum game. Its approach to strengthening Malays is in direct proportion to the suppression of non-Malays.
Kamal’s defence of this ultra movement is untenable but not surprising as after all, this is a candidate who said that he would “take back the federal seat and deliver it to Prime Minister Najib Razak as gift for his first year in office.”

State of the Indians – stroke of the pen? (Malaysiakini)

malaysiakini — April 10, 2010 — It’s been just over two years since the March 08 general election that saw the opposition capturing the states of Kedah, Penang, Selangor and retaining Kelantan.
The opposition loose coalition calling themselves Pakatan Rakyat which comprises of PKR, DAP and PAS also swept to victory in the state of Perak, but leter defections by three of their state representatives saw them lose the state to the Barisan Nasional.
In our attempts to look into the state of Indian affairs two years after the Pakatan victories we talk to community leaders for their assessment of the PR performance because it was on the back of Indian anti-BN sentiments and votes that resulted in the opposition victories.
In this segment we talk to K Arumugam who is MPSJ counsillor and human rights activist and P Uthayakumar who, with his brother Waythamoorthy led the November 25 2007 Hindraf rally that saw 30,000 (some say) ethnic Indians gather at the KLCC to demand their rights as citizens of the country.

UMNO retrenches 20 Indian rubber tappers without alternative arrangements


One Malaysia
The Star on 25/3/10 at page N 55 reported that these rubber tappers are to be moved some 65km away by the now presumably UMNO linked Plantation company. By this treatment the net effect of all these is that the Indians are now colonised by UMNO for 53 years.
P. Uthayakumar


UMNO retrenches 20 Indian rubber tappers without alternative

UMNO: No Indian national primary and secondary school headmasters. But a Malay teacher-to-headmaster in four years and a Dean in 12 years


UMNO42_091107_MUHYIDDIN Our condolences to the family of the Hulu Selangor M.P. With no disrespect may we append as follows:-
At age 22, this gentle-man because a teacher. Within four years he rose to become a headmaster of the Kuala Kubu Baru Secondary School. And within the next two years he was appointed a lecturer at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM).
He got his doctorate in political science from University of California presumably on a full UMNO government scholarship. And within the next six years he became the Dean of UKM’s education faculty. And finally became the Deputy Menteri Besar of Selangor (NST 26/3/2010 at page 6).
It took him just four year to rise from a teacher to a secondary school headmaster. But an Indian however qualified he may be can wait for even forty years but will never get to become a headmaster of a secondary. In fact there are zero Indians that we know who have become a headmaster of a primary or a secondary school.
In the USA since 1965 the blacks were allowed to vote and within a span of 45 years the white majority Americans were even prepared to elect a black “muslim” as their President. But here in Malaysia an Indian cannot even become a Post Master let alone a low level administrator, i.e., a District Officer.
This level of UMNOs’ racism, religious extremism and supremacy does not exist in any other part of the world, the last having ended in Apartheid South Africa some 20 years ago.
P. Uthayakumar
UMNO No Indian national primary and secondary school 
headmasters

UMNOs’ High yielding goat rearing but Indians excluded

najib n muhyiddin It was reported in 2009 that Malay-sia imports 75% of its beef, 90% of its mutton and 95% of its milk. But in almost all of UMNO’s projects for the poor (Malays) with cow and goat farming, the poor Indians have been excluded.
In this latest example contract farming by Felda, Tekun, Veterinary Services Department, etc, loans and training ranging from RM20,000 and up to RM100,000 are given out by UMNO to eradicate poverty among the poor Malays.
But what about thousands of poor, illiterate and unskilled Indians? Why are they excluded from this poverty eradication schemes? Why also the pin drop silence by PKR, DAP and PAS leaders and their 78 MPs?
Because they are soft targets with no or very little political power.
Our only way forward is the Indian political empowerment strategy- the way forward.
Karunai Nithi @ Compassionate justice
UMNO high 
yielding goat rearing but Indian excluded UMNO high yielding goat 2

UMNOs’ high yielding fresh water fish industry for poor Malays, but poor Indians excluded


One Malaysia
This is yet again the tip of the iceberg where the poor and unskilled Indians are excluded from the UMNO led governments’ eradication plans for the Malay poverty.
Of course UMNO very quickly get their MIC mandores to as usual say that the Indians are not interested.
But we know of Indians particularly from Ipoh and Taiping in the former mining pools who never got Mardi and the Fisheries Department help but were told to vacate by UMNOs’ Local Authorities enforcement officers.
We are yet to hear of a single Indian who could put up fish cages and embark on fresh water breeding or aquaculture in any of the natural lakes and rivers in Malaysia. The only Indian aquaculturist in the UPM had his contract terminated and was replaced by a malay.
And the supposedly multi-racial PKR, DAP and PAS will never question this UMNOs’ racism by commission and PKR, DAP and PAS’ racism by omission, but we in turn are accused by Anwar Ibrahim of embarking on a racist agenda for merely speaking up against racism.
J. Lalitha
UMNO high yielding 
fresh water fish 3 UMNO high yielding fresh water fish industry for poor Malays 2
UMNOs high 
yielding fresh water fish industry

Hulu Selangor: PKR Indian Exco mandore’s dog and pony show curtains drawn

EXCO Dr Xavier In our posting yesterday (30/3/10) we had predicted that there would be an accelerated wayang kulit by this PKR Indian Exco Mandore’s MIC style, in view of the upcoming Hulu Selangor by elections.
True to expectations this PKR Indian Exco Mandore has caused to be published in the front pages of today’s Malaysia Nanban ( 31/3/10) and also in Makkal Osai ( 31/3/10) at page 10 that the Bukit Beruntung Tamil School and Hindu cemetery would be given (an additional) four acres of land and six acres of land respectively. Why not land for all Tamil schools, cemeteries and Hindu temples in Selangor all in one go as a permanent solution .
But this Indian PKR mandore did not give in a black and white letter by the Selangor state government to both this school and the cemetery. What the MIC mandores had been doing in the previous 50 years for his “Tuan”, this PKR Indian Exco mandore is doing for his “Tuan” Anwar Ibrahim.
And Anwar Ibrahim in his 2008 general election campaign promised to bring change. Yes Anwar brought about change. He replaced one MIC Exco mandore with a PKR Indian Exco mandore. Watch the dog and pony show from now onwards until at least the Hulu Selangor by elections are over.
Karunai Nithi @ Compassionate Justice.
Hulu Selangor PKR 
Indians Exco mandores 1 Hulu Selangor Pkr 
Indian Exco mandores 2

‘Give Tamil schools land first’ Report from www.FreeMalaysiaToday.com

By B Nantha Kumar and Luke Rintod

KUALA LUMPUR: Hindraf will only campaign for Pakatan Rakyat in the Hulu Selangor by-election if the state government commits itself to giving land to all Tamil schools.
Its information chief S Jayathas said the the Selangor government must “not just make promises but must allocate” land for all 98 Tamil schools in the state.
“We don’t want verbal guarantees anymore from the Selangor menteri besar. Give us the commitment in black and white… or give it to the media in black and white,” he told FMT today when asked if Hindraf will support PKR candidate Zaid Ibrahim in the upcoming by-election.
Nomination is tomorrow, while polling will be held on April 25. Some 19 percent of Hulu Selangor’s voters are Indians.
Yesterday, BN announced MIC information chief P Kamalanathan as its candidate.
Hindraf has been openly critical of the Pakatan state government, alleging that it had failed to take affirmative action to improve the lives of the marginalised Indian community.
CIGMA-HRP 9 
(1) Hindraf strongman P Uthayakumar, who met Sabah PKR chief Jeffrey Kitingan yesterday, said while Hindraf had long since given up hope that the BN would address the plight of Indians in Malaysia, it was also not satisfied with Pakatan because an "Umno mindset or culture” has crept into PKR.
Uthayakumar, who is also the pro-tem secretary-general of the yet-to-be-registered Human Rights Party Malaysia, had indicated the group’s stand to Jeffrey and members of the Common Interest Group Malaysia (CigMa) comprising Daniel John Jambun, Dr Nicholas Bawin and several other PKR supporters.
The delegation is here to support Zaid’s campaign to retain the PKR seat, previously held by Zainal Abidin Ahmad, who died on March 25. Before the election, BN candidate G Palanivel held the seat. He lost to Zainal by a slim 198 majority.
A member of the CigMa delegation, when asked to comment on the meeting with Uthaya, said: "Hindraf was adamant that it would only support Zaid if the Selangor government could satisfy at least one of its 100 requests to Pakatan”
"Uthayakumar wants the Selangor government to allocate land to Tamil schools in Selangor.
"If Zaid or Menteri Besar (Khalid Ibrahim) can give them an assurance, then they will come out to support Zaid.”

Ibrahim Ali, 2 ex-PKR MPs to campaign for BN

By G. Manimaran - The Malaysian Insider
HULU SELANGOR, April 18 — Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali and two ex-PKR MPs, Datuk Seri Zahrain Hashim and Zulkifli Noordin, will join the Barisan Nasional (BN) Hulu Selangor by-election campaign this Friday.
Ibrahim, the independent Pasir Mas MP, has already launched his own campaign a few days ago. He told reporters that he will go on the stump in Batang Kali tonight.
The Malaysian Insider understands both Zahrain and Zulkifli will campaign upon their return late this week from the United States, where they joined Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in launching a Malaysia-US caucus.
Zahrain walked out of PKR in February while Zulkifli was sacked last month. Two other MPs have also quit PKR this year.
Ibrahim (picture) said he will campaign until the eve of the April 25 polling day and has arranged several programmes to help the BN candidate P. Kamalanathan.
Kamalanathan, who is MIC information chief, had controversially told an online news portal that Ibrahim’s Malay rights group Perkasa did not impinge on the rights of others.
A number of Malaysians have debated his statement online, ridiculing him for his stance and for endorsing Perkasa.
Ibrahim’s aide pointed out the lawmaker was campaigning as an independent MP and not as Perkasa chief.
“Datuk Ibrahim is with the BN campaign as an independent MP, not as Perkasa president,” the aide said.
The ex-Umno Pasir Mas division chief has previously campaigned for BN in the Manek Urai and Bagan Pinang by-elections.

DPM hints at yet another PKR defection tomorrow

By Clara Chooi - The Malaysian Insider
BATANG KALI, April 18 — Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin hinted tonight that a top leader of PKR will quit the party tomorrow.
He made the announcement during a ceramah at Kampung Sungai Masin to a Malay-majority crowd here tonight.
Another PKR defection is likely to take place tomorrow, according to Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin. - Picture by Choo Choy May
“Today, the chief of the Shah Alam PKR Youth quit the party... He is from PKR. “Tomorrow, I heard, a big shot will quit the party,” he said in his speech.
Muhyiddin however did not elaborate but added that the resignation would cause a “big explosion” in the party.
“You just wait... Wait, my friends,” he said, smiling.

Muhyiddin did not continue further but speculation is rife that the "big shot" is likely Wangsa Maju MP Wee Choo Keong.
Following the resignations of three PKR lawmakers and the sacking of another one earlier this year, Wee was touted to leave after having joined some of his former colleagues in their criticism against Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng.
Attempts to contact Wee tonight proved futile but several PKR lawmakers told The Malaysian Insider that he was the most likeliest of the remaining number to leave.
If another MP defects, it would reduce PKR's seat count in Parliament from 27 to 26, two seats less than the DAP and five short of its original number seats after Election 2008.
He said that as the days progressed, PKR is slowly disintegrating and is on the verge of destruction.
During the critical period of the upcoming Hulu Selangor by-election, the PKR was dealt with yet another blow when Shah Alam PKR Youth chief Nor’isham Manap, along with his deputy Muhamad Ali Mukhtar quit from the branch.
They were joined by a branch committee member Mohd Nazri Mukhtar and four other members of the Padang Jawa PKR Youth branch.
The group had quit due to PKR leadership’s choice of selecting former Umno man Datuk Zaid Ibrahim to contest in the by-election.
“So far, a total of nine lawmakers from PKR quit the party because they had lost confidence in their own leaders,” said Muhyiddin.

He notedd that the lawmakers had been swayed by Pakatan Rakyat de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's supposed charm.
“He is a very good speaker... a very fiery speaker. Some people say he is very charismatic but in truth, he is just good at twisting things.
“Many of these followers just sit quietly, entranced by him, they support him blindly and even when he speaks a lie, it becomes a truth.
“But then... after a while, they realise they were cheated by him and then they want to run away, run away quickly,” he said.
Muhyiddin also spoke on the issue of Zaid's supposedly “un-Islamic” past but was careful not to make any accusations.
“I know bad stories about Zaid but I do not want to speak about it. I am a son of Tok Iman, Tok Guru, I will not speak ill of others,” he said.
Zaid had admitted on Saturday night that he used to consume alcohol in the past but quickly added that he had repented and had since made peace with God.
Muhyiddin pointed out that it was the media who had asked him on the accusation against Zaid.
“They asked me, it was not me. Ah, those from the media here... correct yourselves... especially from Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider who sometimes like to twist my words,” he said.
Muhyiddin said that he would not speak on the allegation that Zaid consumed alcohol although he knew he had the information.
“I can speak but I told the media I would not speak,” he said, smiling.
Muhyiddin also claimed that the PR was now getting increasingly worried of the BN's growing popularity with the people.
“Everyone knows 1 Malaysia and the people have begun to accept it and embrace it. This is why the PR is worried and scared... because they know that this 1 Malaysia is a unity tool that is very strong,” he said, referring to the concept adopted by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
He noted that this was why the PR was presently raising numerous issues to try and demonise the BN, in hopes of wresting the people's support in their favour.
“They accuse us of having links to Israel's Zionist regime... they said 1 Malaysia is One Israel,” he said.
Muhyiddin said however that this would not work in PR's favour.
“They claim we are tyrannical. But if we really are, then why, even after 50 over years of our rule, are we still in government?” he asked.

PKR man bounces back from dismal start

By Stephanie Sta Maria - Free Malaysia Today

KERLING: “Give me one term and if I don't perform you can get rid of me.” That was PKR candidate Zaid Ibrahim's daring promise to the people of Ladang Sungai Jernih here this evening.
About 100 people, most of them Indians from the area, congregated in the village's makeshift cinema for a glimpse of the man they had only heard about thus far.

A relaxed-looking Zaid went straight to the point when he said that an Indian MP could not take care of the Indian community because MIC remains under Umno's thumb.

“BN held this seat for so long and your lives didn't change,” he told them. “Give the seat back to BN and the vicious cycle continues.”

“I was once poor too,” he said. “In my childhood village there were many poor Indians and Malays. So I understand the life you lead and I can look after you.”

Zaid also gently rebuffed an earlier call by the local organiser of the event for people to return any goodies or money given to them by BN.

“Take the money,” he said. “It's not BN's money, it's the rakyat's money. It belongs to you.”

He wound up his 10-minute speech by telling the people not to be afraid to cast the right vote next Sunday because fear will not give them a better future.

Zaid appeared to have bounced back from a somewhat dismal start to his campaign. Where he was previously whisked off immediately after his speeches, he now lingered to exchange words with the people and be interviewed by the media.

'BN has been useless'
A quick survey conducted by FMT after the event indicated that PKR had the unwavering support of the Indians in Kerling. One resident, Murugan, 40, was vocal in both his backing of PKR and distaste for BN.

“BN has been useless,” he said. “Things only changed when Pakatan won the seat. Even though (the late) Zainal (Abidin Ahmad) wasn't in the public eye, he still made sure he delivered on his promises.”

Murugan rattled off a list of Pakatan contributions, including the building of temples, bus fare for schoolchildren and RM2,500 to any family who lost a loved one.

Muthusamy, 49, and his wife Letchumy, 45, echoed Murugan's sentiments. They said the Indian who was supposed to help them had not, so they had decided to place their faith elsewhere.

“(G) Palanivel used to come around here,” Letchumy said. “But only to listen to our problems. Whenever we pressed him to do take action, he would say that he was too busy.”

“I heard a lot about how Zaid has helped poor people,” Muthusamy added. “So I am confident that he will do the same for us.”
Zaid will face BN's P Kamalanathan and two independent in the by-election. Voting is on April 25.

Pakatan cries foul over EC's transfer of voters

By Stephanie Sta Maria - Free Malaysia Today

HULU SELANGOR: At least 230 voters in Kampung Tanjong have discovered that they have been mysteriously relocated from voting in Hulu Selangor to nearby Rawang constituency.
This transfer of votes has left PKR fuming as it sees this as an attempt by the Election Commission to undermine its chances of winning the by-election on April 25.

“There are stringent procedures regarding the transfer of voters,” Selangor PKR election director Abdullah Sani told FMT.

“Applications must be submitted to Parliament and the EC cannot act on its own accord.

“There is absolutely no basis for the transfer as some voters live less than 100 meters away from their 'unit peti undi'.

“These voters were on the list in 2008. Something is not right here. I was with the voters yesterday and I can tell you that they are very upset,” he added.

He will be submitting a formal complaint to Parliament tomorrow to demand an explanation for the missing Hulu Selangor voters from the district's voter list.

He warned that if the relevant government minister does not respond to his complain by the end of tomorrow, he will then lodge a police report and highlight the issue to 'the rest of the world.'

Voters assigned different stations

According to PKR's election director Fuziah Salleh, the EC's rationale for the transfer was because Kampung Tanjong falls under the Rawang municipality.

The EC's rationale was that moving the voters to the Rawang locality would enable them to be better served, added Fuziah. Rawang falls under the Selayang constituency whose MP is PKR's William Leong.

“They may have an explanation but what we are concerned about is that the transfer has not been gazetted,” the Kuantan MP pointed out.

On a separate matter, she said that a whopping 13,488 registered voters in Hulu Selangor have been assigned different polling stations than the ones they had voted in March 2008. This number makes up 20 percent of the total registered voters in Hulu Selangor.

“These voters have not been told of this transfer yet and may be going to the wrong polling stations on April 25,” she said.

“This could be the EC's way of causing havoc on election day in the hope of toppling Pakatan. It will be a repeat of what happened in Selangor in the 2004 general election,” she said. 

The April 25 by-election will see a four-cornered fight involving PKR's Zaid Ibrahim, BN's P Kamalanathan and independents Johan Mohd Diah and VS Chandran.

Zaid unfazed by 'alcohol' exposé

By Rahmah Ghazali - Free Malaysia Today

KERLING: The Barisan Nasional has launched personal attacks on PKR candidate Zaid Ibrahim but his friends in the Cabinet need not fear retaliation.
“I won't name those leaders in Umno who had done the same... (drinking alcohol). I'm not like Umno. I'm a human (being), so I think it is better for me (not to retaliate). I know that some of my friends there were womanisers, went to casino and other stuff that other rich people would do.
"But I won't name any of them because I have more pedigree than them and my friends in the Cabinet won't have to worry about that," he told reporters after meeting constituents here.

Although the attacks seemed to have gone overboard, Zaid said he is not "worried or scared".

"Let's just wait for more exposé  ... of what I had done in the past. I don't remember what I did as I am already old. So let's just wait. I have nothing to fear.

"In my life, I never regretted what I did but if I did wrong, then I admit my mistake," he said.

Zaid also dared his accusers to divulge more of his blemished past so he would be "free of baggage" come polling day.

'Up to voters to decide'
The former Umno minister also appeared unfazed by the latest character assassination against him, saying that it is up to the voters to decide.

"My difference with Umno leaders is that I am outspoken. If I did something wrong, I would apologise and repent. The question about winning or losing is up to the people.

"If I did not admit it, that would be considered lying. So it is better for me to admit and be open about it. But if I am honest and I still lose, then that is my fate," said the 59-year-old politician.

Zaid also challenged Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, who started the smear campaign, to reveal his (Zaid's) past "because I do not even remember what I did wrong.

"So I hope Muhyiddin could expose a lot of other things about me beginning today until Sunday (the polling day)...

"I have told my family and friends that whatever happens, happens. If they want to embarrass or insult me throughout the campaign week, let it be," he said.

The BN opened fire on Zaid by putting up banners around Hulu Selangor, alleging that he consumes alcohol, which is forbidden in Islam.

This comes in the wake of Muhyiddin's promise to expose Zaid's chequered track record compared to BN's candidate P Kamalanathan's clean slate.

The Hulu Selangor by-election on April 25 is a four-cornered fight between the Kamalanathan, who is the MIC information chief; Zaid, former minister in the prime minister's department when he was in Umno, and two independent candidates.

Let’s talk about mission and vision




Umno, MCA and MIC ran Selangor for 51 years. Over the last two years Selangor was run by Pakatan Rakyat. Can we compare 51 years of Barisan Nasional rule to two years of Pakatan Rakyat rule? Have we seen a better-run Selangor over the last two years with Pakatan Rakyat at the helm compared to 51 years of Barisan Nasional?


NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Zaid may drown in liquor allegations

When announcing BN's candidacy in the Hulu Selangor by-election, coalition deputy chairperson Muhyiddin Yasin said that their candidate, P Kamalanathan, is a man without baggage. He added that this was unlike PKR candidate Zaid Ibrahim who has a chequered track record, and skeletons in the closet, which Muhyiddin promised to expose.

Top of the list of attacks are allegations that Zaid consumes alcohol, which is forbidden in Islam and undermines his identity as a Muslim and a 'man of principle'. As evidence, moments before the nomination process began Kuala Kubu Baru was hit with posters of a doctored image of Zaid with what appeared to be an alcoholic drink. -- Malaysiakini


*************************************************







The dirty tricks and slandering has started. Doctored pictures of Zaid ‘drinking’ are being circulated and published in the pro-Umno Blogs to ‘prove’ that the Pakatan Rakyat candidate has ‘baggage’ while the pro-opposition Blogs are carrying stories about the MIC candidate Kamalanathan being gay.

So what if Kamalanathan is gay? This should not be an issue that is used against him. Ahmad Ismail of Penang is gay as well but I have never used this as an issue against him. I whack him for calling Chinese and Indians pendatang and for tearing up the Gerakan ex-Penang Chief Minister’s photograph. But I never whacked him for being gay.

A person may be gay. Well, that is not his or her fault. Most people who are gay can’t help themselves. They were born that way. But this does not mean they are immoral. Most gay people are faithful to their partners and do not sleep around whilst non-gay people can be very promiscuous and change sex partners ever so often. In that sense gay people are not sexually immoral.

Anyway, who cares what you do in the privacy of your bedroom? The pro-opposition Blogs should not raise the issue of the MIC candidate being gay as the ammunition to attack him. Does he sleep around? That is what should be more important than the issue of him being gay.

Zaid, in turn, is being whacked for his alleged ‘drinking habit’. Okay, let us say he does. So he drinks. So what? Does he buy his drinks using the taxpayers’ money? Does he rob the rakyat to support his drinking habit? Is his liquor being bought using our money? Or does he indulge with his own money and not the money he stole from us?

So you see, even if he does drink, and I am not saying he does, does he hurt any of us or only himself?

The Barisan Nasional people may claim they do not drink. Actually, many do, even Umno people. And they also rob the rakyat, steal from the nation, take bribes, misuse the taxpayers’ money, etc. So they are drinking with our money, not with their own money.

Actually, I don’t care a damn if a person drinks (or indulges in same sex relationships) as long as they do all this with their own money. But when you steal my money to indulge (even if you do not drink but just use the money to take your wife to London and Paris to shop) then I will make an issue out of it.

Let us be very clear as to what constitutes a ‘crime’. What you do in your own time and with your own money is your concern. What you do with my money is my concern. And the Barisan Nasional people use our money to do what they do even if they don’t drink.

I know they are raising the issue of liquor to shock the Malay voters, who represent more than half the voters in Hulu Selangor. If that is the only ‘baggage’ they can find to use against Zaid then this means they have very little to use against him. First of all, they have been caught using doctored photographs to support this allegation. This means they are not able to find evidence to support this allegation and are desperately fabricating the evidence.

Let us get way from the personal attacks and so-called baggage. Both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat need to talk about the mission and vision. We want to know how they plan to run the country. We want to know how they have run the country thus far.

Umno, MCA and MIC ran Selangor for 51 years. Over the last two years Selangor was run by Pakatan Rakyat. Can we compare 51 years of Barisan Nasional rule to two years of Pakatan Rakyat rule? Have we seen a better-run Selangor over the last two years with Pakatan Rakyat at the helm compared to 51 years of Barisan Nasional?

What more is Pakatan Rakyat going to do for Selangor in general and Hulu Selangor in particular? Would the people get a better deal with Pakatan Rakyat at the helm?

The Orang Asli in Selangor are unhappy and there are many Orang Asli in Hulu Selangor. Are they now happier since Pakatan Rakyat has been in charge the last two years? Is there more that they hope to see, which Pakatan Rakyat has not done yet and which needs to be done?

The same goes for the Chinese and Indians. In 51 years of Barisan Nasional rule there was much that they had hoped for but their appeals fell on deaf ears. Has all this changed over the last two years since March 2008 or has Pakatan Rakyat proved to be the same as Barisan Nasional? Has the change of government brought no changes to the state and has Pakatan Rakyat been as deaf as Barisan Nasional? Or have things changed drastically the last two years since Pakatan Rakyat took over?

No, who drinks and who is gay is not the issue. We are more concerned with the mission and vision of these leaders. Even if they don’t drink and are not gay, but if they rob our state, they abuse their positions, they misuse our money, they short-change the voters, they steal from the taxpayers, they line their own pockets, and whatnot, then they need to be rejected.

It is futile to argue about a person’s choice of beverage and sex partners. One side will accuse and the other side will deny. One side must certainly be lying. But let us not waste time arguing about who is telling the truth. We have only a few days to decide whom we want in government. And our choice must be made based on who can best serve the people.

That is how matured voters make their decision and decide on their choice.

Why MIC Hulu S’gor candidate defends Perkasa

P. Kamalanathan is the BN candidate standing in the Hulu Selangor by-election. In his interview with Malaysiakini, he was quoted as saying: “Perkasa has its own role. It is strengthening its (Malay) race, its language and its religion, and we (MIC) are also doing the same by strengthening our race, religion and language.”

Kamalanathan – known as Kamal (why not Nathan?) – was also quoted as saying that Perkasa’s role is about “empowering” the Malay race and it does not trample on the rights of other races.
It is pertinent that his statement should be viewed in juxtaposition with what Perkasa patron Dr Mahathir Mohamad said Friday at the commemoration of Mara’s 44th anniversary.

Responding to reporters’ questions after his keynote address, Mahathir said he sees no time frame for putting a stop to the NEP and that the other communities did not lose much when the policy was introduced in the 1970s.
Mahathir is saying that all the advantages and opportunities being given to Malays under NEP is not robbing Peter to pay Paul. His view is not much different in its syllogism from Kamal’s that Perkasa does not seek to impinge on the rights of others.
‘The pariah caste’

Despite what Kamal may say, the truth is that MIC has miserably failed the Indians. When the Tamil underclass is so poor, in what way can that be construed as the race having been enfranchised?
Indians are strong men and women; it is Malaysia’s apartheid that has weakened them over decades of discrimination. Comparatively, those of the diaspora in the advanced countries have done well for themselves.
Given the Ketuanan Melayu agenda of denial, it is not surprising that Najib Razak’s erstwhile aide Nasir Safar should have commented that the Indian forefathers come here as “beggars”. It elevates the Malays to put down the calibre of the ‘pendatang’. No surprise either that Perkasa should be the first to rally to Nasir’s defence and urge that he be given a chance to explain the context of his remarks.
Also, contrary to the opinion “pergilah kau tertindas”/“what rubbish to say that you’re oppressed” by former Perlis mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin (see Youtube here, 4:42-4:48) when commenting on the Hindraf demonstration – the truth is, Indians are.

Asri’s views (3:57 onwards) are quite typical of Malay prejudice: “Sangat hina kehidupan mereka di dalam negeri mereka. Kasta pariah ini telah dibawa oleh Inggeris ke dalam negara kita … kehidupan yang mereka nikmati di sini seribu kali ganda lebih baik daripada … negara merempat, naik bas, tak pakai baju, tak pakai seluar.”
Translation: “They led an abject life in their country (India). This pariah caste were brought to our country by the English … the life they enjoy here is a thousand times better than in … that suffering country where (people) board the bus not wearing shirt, not wearing pants.”

This truth is that today, Tamil Nadu – where our Indians mostly originated from – possesses the third largest economy (year 2007-2008) among the states in India, and experienced a double-digit GDP growth rate of 12.1% during this period. It is the most industrialized state in India and ranked third for attracting FDI.
Chennai (formerly known as Madras and the capital of Tamil Nadu) houses India’s largest IT park; this IT hub was ranked “the top metropolitan city to invest in Asia Pacific”. Tamil Nadu was ranked 9th region to invest in 2008, and is India’s leading software exporter.

Malaysian Indians would likely be better off if their ancestors had not emigrated here.

Mara shuts out others

As part of the BN election goodie bag, Kamal said “the prime minister and the deputy prime minister have made a decision to build a UiTM” in Hulu Selangor.
Although the establishment of Mara in 1966 predates the NEP which began in 1970, this federal agency is nonetheless a major provider of Malay privileges. Mara administers the Mara Junior Science Colleges, Mara Colleges, Giatmara, Mara Skills Training Institutes, Mara Higher Skills Training Institutes, Mara Infotech Institutes and Mara Professional Colleges.
Mara also offers scholarships and sponsorships, including for students abroad and up to PhD level or doing medicine, as well as loans for entrepreneurs. The reality is that these Mara entities are all over the country and its reach widespread; UiTM is the largest university in Malaysia.
To run all of the above, Mara is allocated tremendous funding each year.
Compared to Mara’s largesse, Kamal’s rhetoric – “Is it wrong for me to want to memperkasakan Tamil schools?” – rings extremely hollow, especially in light of the dilapidated estate schools.
He misses the irony of dangling the UiTM carrot when Mara has an almost single-race enrolment.

How many Muslim converts?
As to Kamal’s ingenuous contention that the pursuit of Malay supremacy does not trample on the religious rights of other races, I would argue otherwise. Not only does it trample, after stomping there’s spitting too for good measure – as the Shah Alam cow-head episode discerned.
MIC’s claim that it has strengthened Indians in their religion should be put to the test with a challenge to reveal the number of Indians who have converted to Islam.

From anecdotal evidence, they have been converted in droves and the side-effects coming to public attention in the form of the bodysnatching and child custody cases teetering between jurisdictions of the syariah and civil courts.

Among the plentiful fresh converts, you see women in their badly tied tudung whose hair has barely shed the scent of jasmine.
Ponder on this: An apple doesn’t call itself a ‘non-orange’. One of reasons why the non-Malays convert (then at least they wouldn’t be non-Muslims) could be to eliminate one half of the two-pronged negation occasioned by diminishment when one is officially a ‘non’.
Mandores to Umno

Kamal, who is MIC information chief, has a professional background in public relations. Judging from the scorn still poured on Indian ethnicity, it’s evident that their image problem has not been rectified. Kamal has done a poor job for MIC’s Indian publicity.
The lowly position of the Indian is even reflected in differentiated word use. A search through Utusan’s archives reveals a general pattern on the word ‘jenazah’ to refer to Muslim, and ‘mayat’ for non-Muslim corpses, e.g. “menuntut mayat Prema a/p Elenchelian” but “menuntut jenazah Abdul Muiz Mokhtar”.

Language when referring to bereaved families is also different: “mengucapkan takziah kepada keluarga Allahyarham Edi Rizal Ramli” but “seorang ahli keluarga si mati” Kugan Ananthan.
And only last week, on April 8, brothers si mati R Satchithantham and R Logeswaran were killed by police in Taiping. Their mayat were riddled with bullets.
Indians are clearly the object of police profiling. They make up 95% of victims shot dead by Polis Diraja Malaysia when only 8% of the Malaysian population, according to an estimate by the Human Rights Party for year 2009 to present.
Yet Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali infamously refutes the contention that ethnic minorities are second class citizens. “Don’t talk shit, you see don’t talk shit. I, I, I repeat don’t talk shit,” he said in his much-viewed Al-Jazeera interview.

Perkasa is playing a zero sum game. Its approach to strengthening Malays is in direct proportion to the suppression of non-Malays.
Kamal’s defence of this ultra movement is untenable but not unexpected as after all, this is a candidate who said that he would “take back the federal seat and deliver it to Prime Minister Najib Razak as gift for his first year in office.” Like a housecat dragging in an offering of a captured mouse.

UMNO ulangi retorik Ketuanan Melayu

"Tun Tan Siew Sin katakan bahawa, orang Melayu menerusi UMNO, bermurah hati melonggarkan syarat-syarat dalam undang-undang negara ini, sehinggakan dalam masa 12 bulan selepas kemerdekaan, 90% penduduk bukan Melayu telah menjadi warga negara.  Ini berbeza dengan keadaan sebelum merdeka, di mana 90% daripada mereka masih tidak diiktiraf sebagai rakyat tanah Melayu walaupun hampir 100 tahun hidup di bawah penjajahan."

Lim Hong Siang, Merdeka Review
Sebagaimana yang diduga, UMNO menjadikan retorik "Ketuanan Melayu"-nya sebagai "senjata" utama ketika menyerang calon PKR dalam PRK Hulu Selangor, Zaid Ibrahim.  Malah, pemimpin UMNO dari Johor, Rusdi Amir meniru cara Timbalan Pengerusi BN Selangor, Noh Omar membacakan kenyataan bekas pemimpin MCA dan MIC, meskipun Noh Omar pernah memohon maaf kepada komuniti Cina kerana tindakannya itu. 【Noh Omar: Saya akan minta maaf kalau menyinggung】
Antara tuduhan yang dilemparkan terhadap Zaid Ibrahim termasuklah memperlekehkan konsep Ketuanan Melayu, "orang luar", mempertahankan Teresa Kok yang kononnya patut ditahan di bawah ISA, si katak yang melompat dari UMNO ke PKR.
Kerajaan negeri Selangor yang diterajui oleh Khalid Ibrahim, diserang sebagai "tidak mengotakan janji dalam manifesto PRU ke-12", lantas PKR yang asalnya Parti Keadilan Rakyat disindir sebagai Parti Kelentong Rakyat.  Pertukaran kerajaan pada 16 September 2008, iaitu janji Anwar Ibrahim yang tidak tertunai, juga antara tajuk yang dibangkitkan untuk menyerang Pakatan Rakyat.

Demikianlah kenyataan-kenyataan yang dikeluarkan dalam satu ceramah politik yang bertemakan "Penipuan Pakatan Rakyat", pada jam 9 malam di kawasan lapang Bilik Gerakan UMNO cawangan Pekan Kerling, semalam.  Ceramah ini dihadiri kira-kira 150 orang, lebih kurang jikalau dibandingkan dengan satu ceramah anjuran Pakatan Rakyat, diadakan di sebuah padang yang tidak jauh dari situ.

"Menteri yang mendatangkan masalah"

Rusdi Amir mempertikaikan Zaid Ibrahim yang bukan lahir di Hulu Selangor, "Siapa dia?  Tinggal di mana?  Berbanding dengan calon kita yang tinggal di Rawang..."

"Kita lihat kembali, bagaimana Zaid di dalam kabinet dilantik sebagai Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, oleh Pak Lah, dialah satu-satu menteri yang mendatangkan masalah dalam kabinet," sambungnya.
Zaid Ibrahim meletak jawatan sebagai Menteri pada September 2008, sebagai bantahan terhadap keputusan kerajaan untuk menahan beberapa orang di bawah ISA, termasuklah EXCO Senior Selangor, Teresa Kok (gambar kiri), blogger terkenal Raja Petra Kamaruddin, wartawan Sin Chew Daily, Tan Hoon Cheng.

"Konon-kononnya di atas prinsip letak jawatan.  Tahu dia letak jawatan sebenarnya untuk apa?  Sebab, penahanan Teresa Kok sahaja.  Bukan sebab apa pun.  Bukan sebab UMNO merosakkan rakyat dan sebagainya, kalau begitu mungkin kita boleh terima, dari sudut logiknya.  Tapi sebab, konon-kononnya penahanan Teresa Kok yang ternyata layak ditahan di bawah ISA," sindirnya, sebelum melontarkan soalan, "Inikah yang ingin kita jadikan pemimpin kita?"
"Mungkin pelbagai sebab, atau pun alasan kita boleh tolak Zaid Ibrahim ini ketika kita membuang undi satu ketika nanti pada 25 haribulan.  Saya percaya, yang hadir di sini adalah pencinta-pencinta kedamaian, pencinta-pencinta keharmonian yang diasaskan oleh Barisan Nasional, iaitu UMNO, MCA, Gerakan dan MIC," katanya.

Empat faktor menolak Zaid

"Apa alasan lagi yang kita nak menolak Zaid Ibrahim?  Yang pertama, saya melihat di sini majoriti orang Melayu.  Saya tidak bermaksud untuk bersifat perkauman di sini.  Zaid Ibrahim ini, merupakan seorang yang telah memperlekehkan Ketuanan Melayu berteraskan keharmonian yang dibentuk oleh kerajaan Barisan Nasional selama ini.  Ini Zaid Ibrahim," kata Rusdi.

Beliau menjelaskan, "Buktinya, kita boleh buka balik rekod, ketika Persidangan Law Asia, persidangan Undang-undang Asia pada tahun 2008, bagaimana di dalam ucapannya, Zaid Ibrahim telah mengatakan bahawa Ketuanan Melayu ini satu perkara yang amat karut sekali.  Ini kata-kata Zaid Ibrahim."
"Kakak-kakak, ibu-ibu nak pilih macam ni lagi?  Esok tak tau apa lagi dia buat?" tanya Rusdi.

Rusdi menambah, "Dia juga yang mempertikaikan Dasar Ekonomi Baru yang telah dicetuskan oleh Allahyarham Tun Abdul Razak.  Ni manusia-lah dia.  Manusia tak dapat tempat dalam UMNO yang tersingkir, terbuang, akhir dia jilat luka, isi borang, dapat jadi ahli PKR, jadi calon pula."

"Katak yang melompat"

"Faktor yang kedua, kita boleh fikir-fikirkan, kenapa kita tidak perlu letakkan nama Zaid Ibrahim ini di kotak minda kita.  Si katak lompat ni sebenarnya.  Dia lompat sana dia lompat sini, dia menyalak sana dia menyalak sini, semata-mata kerana tak dapat tempat dan jawatan.  Dia bukan berjuang.  Kalau orang yang berjuang, mempunyai prinsip perjuangan, memperjuangkan rakyat, memperjuangkan masyarakat, memperjuangkan partinya, saya pasti dia tidak akan melompat-lompat begitu.  Katak si katak melompat," kata Rusdi.
Rusdi (gambar kanan) meneruskan ucapan dengan faktor ketiganya, "Saya berdiri di sini sebagai seorang Malayu walaupun daripada parti Barisan Nasional, tetapi sebagai seorang Melayu saya juga tersentuh apabila dia memperlekehkan Ketuanan Melayu berdasarkan keharmonian kaum ini."

"Yang keempat, yang amat penting, Si Zaid ini bukanlah orang Hulu Selangor.  Tak tau Kelantan mana, dia mari sini nak jadi pemimpin sini.  Itu dia Zaid Ibrahim.  Dia sebut namanya pun, mungkin tak tahu nak sebut dengan jelas ejaan tu.  Zaik Ibrahim," ejek Rusdi yang datang dari Johor.

Memetik hujah Tan Siew Sin

Rusdi kemudiannya mengulas, "Kita melihat juga kepada kedudukan parti Barisan Nasional sendiri yang memimpin kita selama 50 lebih tahun.  Saya fikir tuan-tuan dan puan-puan sekalian, amat yakin dengan keutuhan Barisan Nasional ini, kerana Barisan Nasional ini dibina di atas satu kesedaran, satu landasan untuk membela rakyatnya itu.  Meskipun kita berlainan bangsa, tetapi kita duduk dalam satu penyatuan yang benar-benar bersatu, yang benar-benar bertolak ansur sesama kita sendiri."

"Kalau saya boleh berkongsi, apa yang telah diasaskan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin MCA dan MIC ketika itu.  Sebab ini sejarah pada ketika itu.  Apa yang telah diungkapkan oleh Presiden MIC (tersilap, sebenarnya MCA), oleh Tun Tan Siew Sin pada ketika itu," kata Rusdi.

"Saya ingin bacakan.  Ingin berkongsi dengan tuan-tuan.  Apa luahan hati MCA terhadap orang Melayu terhadap UMNO.  Dan ini yang menjadi asas kepada perjuangan MCA, MIC, rakan di dalam Barisan Nasional.  Dia katakan bahawa...ini dipetik melalui satu pernyataan sejarah, yang saya perolehi."

Beliau meneruskan, "Tun Tan Siew Sin katakan bahawa, orang Melayu menerusi UMNO, bermurah hati melonggarkan syarat-syarat dalam undang-undang negara ini, sehinggakan dalam masa 12 bulan selepas kemerdekaan, 90% penduduk bukan Melayu telah menjadi warga negara.  Ini berbeza dengan keadaan sebelum merdeka, di mana 90% daripada mereka masih tidak diiktiraf sebagai rakyat tanah Melayu walaupun hampir 100 tahun hidup di bawah penjajahan."

"Sebagai membalas kemurahan hati Melayu, MCA dan MIC bersetuju meneruskan dasar memelihara dan menghormati kedudukan istimewa orang Melayu dan pada masa yang sama mempertahankan kepentingan-kepentingan sah kaum yang lain.  Ini asas MCA dan MIC."
Kemudian, beliau menuding jari kepada PR, "Segala apa yang berlaku pada hari ini, yang mencabar hak istimewa orang Malayu datangnya daripada si pengkhianat-pengkhianat PKR.  Kaki kencing semua ni."
"Mereka (PR) yang mencetuskan ketegangan kaum di negara ini dan mereka yang sepatutnya kita singkirkan daripada landasan politik di negara pada hari ini, tuan-tuan dan puan-puan.  Kita buktikan di Hulu Selangor pada hari ini, bahawa mereka tidak layak untuk memimpin."

Memetik hujah V.Sambathan

"Apa pula yang dikatakan oleh pemimpin MIC pula?  Saya berkongsi dengan tuan-tuan.  Pada 1965, Tun Sambathan, ini sejarah, kita tak boleh nafikan.  Ini asas perjuangan MIC pada hari ini.  Ia katakan bahawa, saya baca satu persatu..."

"Pada tahun 1955, kita telah memenangi pilihan raya dengan majoriti yang tinggi.  Selanjutnya mendapat kemerdekaan dalam masa dua tahun kemudian.  Dalam jangka masa itu, kita terpaksa berbincang dan menangani pelbagai perkara termasuk soal kewarganegaraan.  Persoalannya di sini, apakah yang dilakukan oleh orang Melayu, memandangkan kita bercakap menyentuh perkauman.  Apakah yang dilakukan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin Melayu?  Mereka mempunyai 88% daripada pengundi penyokong mereka, apakah yang mereka putuskan mengenai isu kewarganegaraan?"

"Ini, kaum India bercakap.  Bertanya kepada orang Melayu.  Kemudian dia berkata lagi, jika kita lihat, di serata negara Asia dan Asia Timur, kita akan mendapati kaum India tidak akan diterima di Ceylon, dan juga tidak akan diterima di Burma.  Dan lihat saudara kita kaum Cina, mereka tidak diterima di Thailand, Vietnam, Kemboja dan negara-negara lain.  Dan apakah bantuan berhubung kewarganegaraan yang mereka perolehi di semua wilayah tersebut?  Di Burma, seperti yang kita semua maklum, kaum India telah diusir keluar, di Ceylon, mereka tidak diberi taraf kewarganegaraan seperti juga di Burma."

"Saya tahu dan anda juga tahu.  Dan dalam pada itu, apa yang sedang berlaku di Malaysia?  Ini diakui oleh India.  Di sini kita mendapati, pemimpin Melayu berkata, kita akan menerima mereka sebagai saudara.  Kita akan berikan mereka sepenuh peluang untuk meneruskan kehidupan di negara ini.  Kita akan memberi mereka peluang untuk menjadi warga negara.  Dan seterusnya pada tahun 1957, dengan tidak mengambil kira kebolehan berbahasa Melayu, ribuan orang India, Cina dan Ceylon jadi warga negara."

"Seperti yang saya nyatakan, saya amat bernasib baik kerana dilahirkan di negara ini.  Di manakah mereka boleh berjumpa bangsa yang lebih prihatin, bersopan santun dan tatatertib daripada bangsa Melayu?  Di manakah anda boleh dapat layanan politik yang baik untuk kaum pendatang?  Di manakah dalam sejarah dunia, saya bertanya kepada anda, ini adalah fakta.  Siapakah anda untuk menjaga keselamatan kami?  Saya adalah kalangan 10% kaum minoriti di sini, tapi saya amat gembira di sini.  Ini kata-kata pemimpin MIC.  Dan inilah yang menjadi landasan dan asas perjuangan mereka."

Rusdi mengakhiri ucapannya dengan keluhan, "Apa yang berlaku selama dua tahun yang lepas, apa yang berlaku di Selangor ini khususnya, kadang-kadang sedih juga, bila melihat tanah milik Yayasan Basmi Kemiskinan (YBK) dirampas dengan rakus oleh jahanam-jahanam di situ.  Tanah tersebut dibangunkan dengan institusi pengajian, kita memberi peluang pendidikan kepada anak-anak kita.  Tetapi mereka rampas sewenang-wenangnya, kerana dek, cukai tak bayar...yang pada asalnya mereka bersetuju untuk memberi pengecualian."

Janjikan bulan dan bintang

Sebelum ucapan diteruskan oleh Ketua Menteri Sabah, Musa Aman, pengacara ceramah sempat menghangatkan suasana dengan membacakan manifesto PKR pada PRU ke-12, yang mencakupi janji potong cukai pintu di Selangor, elaun tadika RM50 setiap orang, elaun khas untuk ibu tunggal, bantuan kewangan anak muda berkahwin, sewa percuma sekurang-kurangnya tiga bulan pertama di premis kerajaan negeri dan sebagainya, sambil menyelar bahawa janji-janji tersebut tidak ditunaikan.
"Ini parti pakatan rakyat-kah, DAP kah, PAS tidak laku di Sabah," dakwa Musa Aman, disambut dengan sorakan, "Bukan saya nak kata orang Sabah bijak, tetapi rakyat Sabah tahu menilaikan mananya parti yang benar dan parti mana yang bohong?"

Sambil mengungkit dakwaan Anwar Ibrahim bahawa pertukaran kerajaan persekutuan akan berlaku pada 16 September 2008, yang tidak direalisasikan akhirnya, Musa Aman berkata "Kami kata tunggulah, tunggulah, ini pembohong ni.  Tunggulah 16 September, tidak ada yang melompat, apa yang melompat, sekarang dia punya MP-MP (ahli parlimen), ADUN yang melompat."
Beliau cuba menyuntik semangat kepada penyokong BN Selangor, yang kehilangan kuasa kerajaan negeri Selangor dalam PRU ke-12, "This is the starting point (Ini titik permulaan), menangkan Hulu Selangor ini, the rest will be history (selainnnya akan menjadi sejarah).  Percayalah, you menang Hulu Selangor ini, you akan menang semua.  Pasal rakyat sudah tahu, rakyat sudah tahu menilai mana yang baik mana yang buruk.  Mana yang padi, mana yang beras, mana yang intan, mana yang kaca atau batu."
"Parti pembangkang, atau parti Pakatan Rakyat ini batu semua ni.  Kitalah intan berlian yang baik, yang menunaikan janji," katanya.

Malah, Musa Aman sempat menyindir PR sebagai "kelentong sana kelentong sini", "dia mau janji bulan dan bintang, apa bulan dan bintang?  Apa pun tak ada!"
*Lim Hong Siang ialah Editor MerdekaReview, edisi bahasa Melayu.

Some questions from our Penang Friends and HIndraf/HRP's responses

Why did BN field an Indian Candidate in Hulu Selangor despite protests from UMNO, if Indians are irrelevant to BN?
The Indians votes are the only thing relevant of the Indians to UMNO. This is UMNO’s basic political axiom.

Always bear this in mind.
By Naragan
UMNO uses an Indian face to win this election and by the way this also helps them perpetuate the illusion of UMNO including the Indians, that’s all. Always remember - a vote for MIC is not a vote for MIC per se, or for you or for me. It is only a vote for UMNO – always has been and always will be. They hold all the levers of power – all.

In Hulu Selangor, if UMNO did not field an MIC candidate, UMNO will surely lose that seat. Consider the following analysis from Subramaniam Bharathy:
The electorate was 63,600 strong in 2008 March. The number of people who voted on that fateful day was 47,600 (75% turnout). Let us assume for the purpose of this analysis that the 25% who did not vote on that day were evenly spread between the Malays, Chinese and Indians. There were some 1500 spoilt votes. Given that the BN candidate was Indian, it is likely that most who spoilt their votes that day would have been Malay voters, because of their indifference. A large number of Chinese and Indian voters were all charged up to vote out UMNO in March 2008.

If 53% (based on the ethnic breakout) of the voters on that day were Malay, and 1500 Malay votes were spoilt, it would mean 23,700 Malay voters voted that day. 13,300 Chinese and 9,000 Indians also voted that day (all based on the ethnic breakdown). G. Palanivel of MIC received 22,979 votes. His opponent, the late Dr Zainal Abidin Ahmad of PKR, got 23,177 votes. Almost even.

It would be reasonable to say that at least 60-70% of the votes of the Indians went to PKR or 5,500 to 6,300 Indian votes went to PKR. And it would also be reasonable to say that at least 70-80% of the Chinese votes went to PKR or 9,200 to 10,300 votes. So the non Malay votes that went to PKR were from 14,700 to 16,600.

That means PKR only received 6,500 to 8,400 Malay votes. Of the votes PKR received that day only 28% to 36% were Malays votes. 40-45% of the votes they received were Chinese votes and 20 – 32% of the votes were Indian votes.

That also means about 2700 to 4500 Indian votes would have gone to Palanivel or to UMNO (BN ouside, UMNO inside) on that day. Now, just think how many of these Indian votes UMNO would have been able to capture if the candidate was non-Indian, everything else remaining the same. Especially given the anti establishment feeling among the Indians. Cannot put a number to it, but that number would be surely less – don’t you think? The margin of victory finally was only just over a hundred. If the candidate had been non Indian then the result would have been a much larger margin of loss for UMNO. That’s why they gave the seat to an Indian candidate. Not because they think for a moment that the Indians are relevant.

Let us not continue to fall into their time worn trap. Use an Indian face, create and perpetuate an illusion of inclusiveness and hang on to UMNO power — Ketuanan Melayu. 52 years will become a 100 years like this – the future will just be a worse replication of the present.

For our relevance we have to look elsewhere, not the ethnicity of the candidates they put up. For instance in PR they have many Indian representatives. Does it mean that the Indians have that much more representation? PR calls themselves multiracial. The truth of the matter is, the Malays have conceded some of their policy power to the Chinese. Both of them have conceded nothing yet to the Indians. Indians have no influence at the level of policy. Let me quote from Iraiputtiran’s recent blog in the Human Rights Party website to illustrate my point:

"Nine Chinese schools in Perak were allocated 1,000acres of land. Tamil schools - one in Bagan Jermal of 0.9 ha,

- 349 planned villages and 134 new villages with 110,000 and 102,000 titles respectively are to be given out irrespective of the National Land Council’s order, involving almost all Malay and Chinese owners and land recipients excluding Indians,

- Freehold titles were given for just RM63 to 110,000 planned villages (almost 99% Malay) and 102,000 (estimated to almost 99% Chinese) Chinese new villagers in Perak, but not to Indians in Buah Pala or any other Indian settlement,

- DAP made such a big fuss over a pig abattoir in Kedah but not Buah Pala,

- A Teoh Beng Hock Trust Fund was created and “Justice for Teoh Beng Hock” campaign begun on DAP website and not for the so many other Indians killed by the Malaysian police,

- There a Ceramah Perdana over the Malay Chamber of Commerce marginalisation of Malays charges at Tapak Pesta for the Malays but none over the Kampung Buah Pala Issue

In summary, therefore, our relevance is not to be measured by the colour of skin of the representative but by the degree of influence we have over Government policy. Look at all that above and you tell me that the Indian representatives made a difference.

And by no means are we surrendering to irrelevance, just because we ignore one by-election.

The struggle of Hindraf and HRP is exactly about creating that relevance, but with a clear focus on relevance that matters – relevance in policy in areas that affect Indians in the country. Nothing short of that.

But we have to be realistic about our starting point. And it is pointless showing strength in places where it is not going to have any real impact and then deluding ourselves that we are relevant. Today, given the different political arrangements we have in the country, we are not relevant. That is the unfortunate truth.

Don’t the EC have absolute discretion to designate the constituency for the voters in a State despite their change of address by the voters within a State?

Wouldn’t BN take preemptive measures using the EC to spilt the Indian Voters in the State using the jurisdictional powers of EC?
The EC decides only the constituency delineation. Your address determines your constituency. So it is where you declare your address to be. You go to the JPN and register your hometown address then go to the Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya in the 36th floor of Komtar (or at SPR office wherever else in Malaysia) and give them your latest address. They will capture it in the system. That becomes your voting address. EC can only try to delay the change of the address but they will be violating their charter if they do not reflect your voting address accurately. They say it can take up to 5 months before they will reflect the change, I do not see why, but that is what they say. You can check your voting address by going to www.spr.gov.my and go to “Ruangan Informasi” and click on “Semak daftar Pemilih” and then key in your IC number. You can see your voting constituency.

All this should reference the registered address only. If you change your address to your hometown address then you vote from your hometown. Lim Guan Eng is from where? Melaka or Penang? His father is from where? Melaka or Ipoh? Anwar Ibrahim’s is from where, KL or Permatang Pauh? Najib is from where, KL or Pekan. There are lots of people doing sinilar things.

I live now in Gelugor. Let us say I grew up in Prai and I still have relatives in Prai. Which is my hometown? I decide. Anything wrong with that? Just like that. We have to use the rules to our advantage, just as UMNO has done. For example, Putrajaya which is largely a Bumi constituency has only 5000+ voters, but they have one MP. On the other hand Kapar in Selangor has 112,000+ voters and they also have one MP. Kapar however is a non-Malay majority constituency. UMNO has done a lot of this kind of self motivated delineation – we call it gerrymandering. If they can do that and that is all within the rules, should we just keep quiet and let ourselves be had? Let us also do what the rules allow and create our survival strategy.

Even if the courts are going to act on address change issues, there are too many obstacles. It won’t be easy. You have 90 days before you need to finally reflect your address to be that of where you actually stay. In other words, you can be at an address other than where you actually live for more than 90 days and you violate nothing. Besides, you could have moved to another address because you are anticipating to move your job there soon, you are preparing for it. Or you have decided to move there because your children can go to a better school there – any number of legitimate reasons.

Besides, if they want to prosecute they will have to prosecute some bigwigs on both sides of the divide as well, as I showed earlier. So, it is just a scare tactic to prevent us, the common man, from getting as clever as UMNO.

I hope that addresses your concerns. And now, join us in our effort to make ourselves relevant using our own best resources.

Thank you.

Regards,
Naragan

HIJACKING THE SOCIAL CONTRACT







 
1. I wonder who is hijacking "social contract".

2. In this brave new world people write about things with authority but without knowing anything or doing proper research.

3. True the constitution does not mention "Malay rights" but obviously the mention of the special position of the Malays implies recognition of certain positions and privileges that they hold. The leaders of the time, the Tunku, Tun Razak, Tun Sambanthan and Tun Tan Siew Sin understood the "special position" of the Malays as the indigenous people of Tanah Melayu, the "Malay Land".
4. For this recognition by the non-Malay leaders, something had to be done to reciprocate their acceptance. The Tunku agreed to waive the conditions for becoming citizens so that one million non-Malays could become citizens with all the citizenship rights, ignoring the required qualifying conditions.

5. The Malays did not fight against the Malayan Union only to give up all that they had gained. But their leaders were realistic enough to have a quid pro quo arrangement. Does anyone seriously think that the Malay leaders would reduce their majority from 80% in the 1955 elections to less than 60% after the gift of citizenship to unqualified citizens? Only the weak minded would think so.

6. Social contracts are almost never written contracts with everyone signing at the bottom. It is usually an understanding based on trust. It is a measure of Malay trust of the non-Malays that they were prepared to give up what they had gained in the fight against the Malayan Union in order to accommodate even those whose loyalty to the country was not proven.

7. The Malays hate turmoil. They prefer accommodation. Had they been like some other indigenous people, they would have insisted on their rights even if they had to be violent and to wait a longer period.

8. We should appreciate the wisdom of the leaders of the Malays, the Chinese and the Indians who laid the foundation of inter-racial cooperation for their beloved country. Far too many colonies of the West gained independence only to experience turmoil and instability and actual regression. The colonial powers had predicted that Malaysia with its multiracial population and numerous ethnic disparities and differences would also fail. But we haven't. And we haven't because our founding fathers understood the situation and devised wise solutions.

9. In making use of the provision for the "special positions" of the Malays, the post-1969 leaders came up with affirmative actions. These are undoubtedly "crutches" and crutches should be discarded as soon as strength is gained. Only the selfish would advocate throwing away the crutches of others simply because they have already made good use of their own.

Rakaman Hari Penamaan Calon,Sabtu,17 April 2010

Another attack of Muhyiddin’s “foot-in-mouth” disease when he claimed that Kamalanathan is truly 1Malaysia as “Kamal” is Malay, “Alan” a Chinese and “Nathan” an Indian name

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had another attack of his “foot-in-mouth” disease when he claimed that the Barisan Nasional candidate for Hulu Selangor P. Kamalanathan is truly 1Malaysia as “Kamal” is Malay, “Alan” a Chinese and “Nathan” an Indian name.

Muhyiddin is insulting the intelligence of the 65,000 voters of Hulu Selangor with such “garbage”.

Would Kamalanathan respond and answer in a crowd if someone shouts “Kamal” or “Alan”? Clearly not.

If Kamalanathan’s name comprises of “Kamal”, “Alan” and “Nathan” then he has a longer name and should be called “Kamalalannathan”! The BN candidate for Hulu Selangor will stare at you for being hostile and unfriendly if you call him that!

Does Muhyiddin Yassin’s name qualify to be a “1Malaysia” name? Where are the Chinese and Indian components? What about Kadazan and Iban components?

All existing names of Malays, Chinese, Indians, Kadazans and Ibans in Malaysia are truly 1Malaysia names, for this is proof of the wealth of diversity as well as the unique feature of Malaysia’s national unity from multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-linguistic diversity.

Muhyiddin should not trivialise the names of all Malaysians, whether Malays, Chinese, Indians, Kadazans or Ibans or Malaysians cannot but question his suitability and credibility as Malaysia’s Deputy Prime Minister.

It is sad that coming from someone who had declared that he is Malay first and Malaysian second, he should now come out with another blooper trying to play on the name of Kamalanathan as if the Pakatan Rakyat candidate Datuk Zaid Ibrahim does not have a sufficiently 1Malaysia name!

Muhyiddin should realise that he is making Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s 1Malaysia slogan and concept into a big joke!

[Speech at launching the DAP SuperSunday 18 walkabouts by DAP MPs, State Assembly members and leaders in 18 Chinese new villages, Malay kampongs and Indian settlements in Hulu Selangor constituency at the DAP Kuala Kubu Baru by-election centre on Sunday, 18th April 2010 at 9 am]

Hulu Selangor by-election is no sure-winner for Zaid – winnable provided PAS, PKR and DAP fully mobilise to get out every single Malay, Chinese, Indian and Orang Asli vote on April 25

We are launching this SuperSunday18 walkabouts by DAP Members of Parliament, State Assembly members and leaders from all over the country even from Sabah (we have MP for Kota Kinabalu Hiew King Cheu and DAP Kadazan leaders with us) in 18 Chinese new villages, Malay kampongs and Indian settlements in the Hulu Selangor constituency in the only available Sunday in this eight-day by-election.

Hulu Selangor by-election is no sure winner for the Pakatan Rakyat and our candidate Datuk Zaid Ibrahim.

In the March 2008 general election, PKR candidate Datuk Zainal Abidin defeated Barisan Nasional candidate G. Palanivel with a slim majority of 198 votes.

However, in the three constituent state assembly seats, all won by BN, the three majorities secured by BN totalled 6,176 votes, comprising 3,548 majority in Hulu Bernam (contested by PAS), 2,179 majority in Batang Kali (contested by PKR) and 448 majority (contested by DAP).

What is the reason for the reversal of the total BN majorities of 6,167 votes from the three constituent state assembly seats into a 198-vote majority for the PKR?

Was it because 6,167 votes for BN at the state assembly level turned around to vote for PKR at the parliamentary level?

Clearly not, as the parliamentary vote for PKR (23,388) is only 54 votes more than the total votes polled by the PR candidates in the three state assembly seats (23,334).

Could this be explained by the spoilt votes, as there was a big chunk of 1,466 spoilt votes for the Hulu Selangor parliamentary seat.

The answer is again no, as the total number of spoilt votes for the three state assembly seats were quite sizable, accounting for 1,271 votes.

Palanivel secured 23,190 votes for the Hulu Selangor parliamentary seat, which is 6,320 votes less than the total of 29,510 votes cast for the three BN state assembly seats.
Clearly over 6,200 voters in the last general election who voted for the Barisan Nasional at the State Assembly level did not vote for Palanivel. What is significant is that these more than 6,200 votes also did not vote for Datuk Dr Zainal Abidin.

Where did these more than 6,200 votes disappear to? There should be an inquiry as to where these over 6,200 votes went to, as every voter is issued a parliamentary and a state assembly ballot at the polling station – and the total for parliamentary and state assembly votes issued should tally for the same constituency.

For our purpose however, it should be a salutary reminder that over 6,200 voters in the last general election who refused to repeat their vote for the BN at the parliamentary level as they had voted at the State Assembly elections also did not vote for PKR candidate, and if 2,000 or 3,000 of these voters come out to vote for BN on April 25, BN candidate would win.

All PKR, PAS and DAP leaders and campaigners should realise therefore that Hulu Selangor by-election is not a sure winner.

I still believe that Datuk Zaid can be elected the new MP for Hulu Selangor but very hard work is called for, as every vote counts.

Things have changed in the past two years – the sterling performance of the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor State Government and the hopes for far-reaching changes in the 13th General Elections following the March 8 political tsunami of the 2008 general elections.

However, we cannot be complacent. In fact, we should all be under a sense of great test and crisis.

This is why DAP has launched this SuperSunday18 – and the message is Pakatan Rakyat must get every Malay, Chinese, Indian and Orang Asli voter to vote for Zaid and national change in the country if Zaid is to win and become the new MP for Hulu Selangor.

Hulu Selangor Voters Now Favour BN, Says Muhyiddin

HULU SELANGOR, April 18 (Bernama) -- Voters in Hulu Selangor, who will be choosing their new Member of Parliament on April 25, are now generally in favour of the Barisan Nasional (BN) compared to when the general election was held in 2008, said deputy prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

Muhyiddin, who is also BN deputy chairman and Umno deputy president, said their openness to hear out BN leaders on issues dear to them showed that they were willing to accept the ruling coalition.

"I hope this momentum can be sustained and strengthened further. We will step up our campaign activities for the remaining six days before polling begins," he told reporters after meeting the people of Hulu Yam Timur, here on Sunday.

The deputy prime minister also said the BN election machinery would not take things for granted but would go all out to woo voters in the constituency, which was a BN stronghold prior to the 2008 election.

Asked about allegations by the Opposition that the Election Commission (EC) had changed the polling stations of some 13,400 voters, Muhyiddin said the matter should be referred to the EC.

"I am not aware of this. Let the EC explain, but I do not think they would do this. The Opposition always like to make baseless accusations... this matter needs to be clarified by the EC," he said.

Asked about Opposition claims that the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) candidate Datuk Zaid Ibrahim would be accepted by Muslims in Hulu Selangor as compared to Muslims in Kota Baharu because they (Hulu Selangor Muslims) were more open minded, Muhyiddin said Muslims were the same anywhere.

"Their expectations are the same. I leave it to the (Muslim) voters to make their own judgement," he said.

Touching on the APCO issue, he said the government was not hiding anything and had clarified the matter a number of times.

"APCO is not an Israeli company..it is an international company that was hired to promote Malaysia. They are experts in the field and we pay them to promote our country.

"They are not involed in policy making. The Opposition-ruled states also use foreign companies to attract investment. This is a normal matter," he said.

He said the Opposition were resorting to accusing APCO as an Israeli entity because they saw the 1Malaysia slogan as a threat to their survival.

"Because the 1Malaysia concept has recieved all round support, they are trying all sorts of tricks to scuttle it. The 1Malaysia initiative introduced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak is for the good of the country, not to be politicised," he said.

He said Hulu Selangor were sending positive signals and understood the approach taken by Najib unlike PKR where the leaders in it themselves had expressed disappointment in the party's top leadership.

"The feel good factor is beginning to be there, the slogan is not important. We cannot compare 1Malaysia with 1Israel. Because many Malaysians have adopted the slogan, the Opposition are starting to twist it around for political mileage," Muhyiddin added.

The Hulu Selangor by-election on April 25 is a four-cornered fight between the BN's P. Kamalanathan, the MIC Information Chief; Zaid, who was formely minister in the prime minister's department when he was in UMNO, and two independent candidates.

Submarine deals: The French connection - Anil Netto

A submarine that has problems diving?
John Berthelson of the Asian Sentinel has given us something more to think about here.

The manufacturer says the KD Tunku Abdul Rahman has successfully completed sea trials following “scheduled maintenance”. See statement here. – Photo by DCNS.
So far, 10 Scorpene subs have been ordered from DCNS – two for Chile, two for Malaysia (at a cost of RM3.4 billion) and six for India. DCNS designed the Scorpene and developed it jointly with Spanish naval shipbuilder Navantia. The second Scorpene for Malaysia, the KD Tun Razak, is expected to reach Lumut in the middle of the year.

Services for the submarines in Malaysia are supposed to be handled by Perimekar, which is reportedly associated with the Boustead Group. This is the same Boustead that is claiming damages from the Penang Island Municipal Council because it was asked to scale down its hotel in the heritage zone of George Town.
(Apart from selling Scorpenes to Malaysia, DCNS was also involved in a Stealth Frigate Programme with Singapore.)
Meanwhile, Pakistan is reportedly interested in acquiring seven submarines, three of them French Marlin class latest diesel electric conventional versions “in a bid to meet any challenge from the rapidly expanding Indian navy”.
And where is Pakistan reportedly turning to for the French submarines? Why DCN of course. $$$
With French prosecutors investigating several submarine deals, some people could be in for sleepless nights.

Two-faced Najib: The truth on Iran, free speech

By Nathaniel Tan,

I had a very positive experience on nomination day, but more on that soon I hope :) Also hope you’ve enjoyed guest bloggers like John.

Today, want to talk about how Najib speak with forked tongue. Let’s try to get to the bottom of this Iran issue.

The issue again is whether Malaysia decided to cut off gasoline supplies to Iran, or whether Iran simply stopped requesting gasoline.

Quite frankly, either Najib or the reporters are lying – and this is very easy to demonstrate. Now:

The prime minister said Petronas was involved in a spot sale to Iran in mid March under a third party deal but since then there had been no requests.”It is not correct, it was not a decison taken by Petronas per se. It involved a spot sale and there was no requirement anymore, so they don’t do it (anymore),” he told Malaysian reporters on Friday.

Ah, but what do the more reliable foreign press have on record?

Najib said the gasoline supplies suspension was decided by Petronas after consultations with his government.

So? I think it’s clear the PM has contradicted himself in most glaring terms.

To one audience he tries to suck up shamelessly to American interests and foreign policy, while back hone he denies cutting off gas to a prominent Muslim nation.

I think few are surprisedlah, given Najib’s total lack of principles.

The other thing Najib totally lacks is originality.

In his speech titled “A New Vision for Malaysia”, the Prime Minister made clear that he was not opposed to dissent or opposition because he believed legitimate views deserved to be heard.

Wow. The title of his speech is only one (insignificant) word different from PKR’s 2008 campaign slogan: A New Dawn for Malaysia.

Does he really have to steal *everything* from Pakatan? :|

And not opposed to dissent? Remember the speech Najib’s administration prepared for the DYMM Agong? The China Press scandal regarding the IGP?

Oh wait, as my friend just reminded me, I needn’t go far to find examples – what about Where is Justice?? Mr. Najib’s government is still holding all my books that he confiscated, and intimidating bookstores, causing me considerable financial losses.

A real snake this guy, a real snake.