Share |

Tuesday 19 March 2013

Is HINDRAF blueprint a fact of fallacy for humanity to survival?

Is HINDRAF blueprint a fact of fallacy for humanity to survival?

Pre GE12, you had more than 100,000 Malaysian Indians gathered to voice their grievance? Fact or fallacy?

The opposition parties ran their political agenda solely on Makkal Sakthi, should watch their videos. Fact or Fallacy? Even promised Kg Buah Pala folks but we all know what happened when politically expediency was at play.  

Post GE12, with Pakatan in power nothing has changed for the Malaysian Indians because 110,000 land titles in 349 land titles in 349 Rancangan Kampung Tersusun for Malay muslims in Perak; 102,000 land titles in 134 Chinese New  Villages in Perak. 10 acres to each and every Orang asli in Perak; 1,000 acres of land and RM100 Million for pig farming in Sepang Selangor and  more than 607 (Chinese) New Villages nationwide with 1.2 million villagers. Fact or fallacy? 

Looking at Indian villages within PR hold like Kg Muniandi, Kg Ghandi, Kg Kanchang Puteh, kg Chikadee, Kg DBI, Kg Buah Pala, Kg Bengali, nothing happened. Fact or fallacy?  

Let’s look at the PR manisfesto, for Sabahans/Sarawakians; 1) Raising oil royalty from 5% to 20%. 2) Appointment of Sabahans and Sarawakians to lead and hold office in the Govt. 3) Cleaning up citizenship registry list. 4) Recognition of customary land rights. 5) Raising the level of infrastructure development.

Orang Asli's : 1) Preserving orang Asli customary land rights and welfare. 2) 141k hectares of land reserved. 3) Water and Electricity supplied to Orang Asli settlements. 4) 5000 educational scholarships for Orang Asli students ( Isn’t this all catered in the constitution)

For Chinese : 1) PR will recognize the certificate for Combined Chinese Secondary Schools for the purpose of furthering academic admission to higher education institutions.

For Malays: 1) Abolishing PTPTN loans and as such billions of taxpayers money will be wiped out from existing loans taken but not paid up by irresponsible Malays. 2) Justice for Felda settlers. 3) RM 500 mil allocated for Military Veterans. Increasing govt contribution to Armed Forces Fund Board from 15% to 20% and an addition 5% to a special fund for them. Introducing a soldiers Divident - RM 2k per year. 4) Dissolving 1MDD so that Khazanah remains sole state investment body but Khazanah has been years run in a shady manner benefiting exclusively for Malays primarily. 5) GLC's to be tuned to produce more viable Bumiputra entrepreneurs. 6) Going to double Tabung Haji Fund 7) More allocations for Islamic religious depts 8) adding value to wakaf land.

Now as a Malaysian Indian, I try to understand why we need to be the scapegoat when we have the same aspiration as the rest of the Malaysian? Is this a fact or fallacy?  

Hmmm!!!!, Malaysian Indians not relevant in Malaysia except when we want their votes, fact or fallacy?

Conclusion, whenever it involves a Malaysian Indian, they can be pushovers because it becomes a fallacy for how it breeds for the rest no matter how the truth is self sustained for the fact. Fact or fallacy?

Back to my first question, is HINDRAF blueprint a fact or fallacy?  Fallacy is a melting pot, truth isn’t because it is self sustained not worrying of the possibilities as it is self evidenced for humanity to prevail for the oppressed and marginalized poorer segment of the Malaysian Indians. Hee!!!, Hee !!! Is this fact or fallacy again in an objective manner or a subjective one for how the waves shore us individually to safety?  

-R.Shan (Human Being)

No comments: