By Nathaniel Tan,
Sometimes, it’s like Nazri is trying to win a prize, or do a scientific experiment: just how stupid a thing can I say?
Not long ago, on the APCO issue:
Nazri said that the “Umno APCO” chants were serious allegation because it implied that the Malay ruling party was involved in corruption.
“APCO, UMNO APCO is a serious allegation. Umno is a member of the Barisan Nasional who employs APCO and is paying APCO RM28 million. To say that Umno is APCO and APCO is Umno that is to say that we are using government money to put into the coffers of Umno. Because if Umno is APCO it means that government knowingly employs APCO to pay APCO RM28 million when APCO belongs to Umno. It is a very serious allegation.
O.O
That is his reasoning? He was afraid YB Mahfuz would make people think APCO is owned by UMNO and thus the recipient of inappropriate funding from the government?? :| :|
I mean seriously. What kind of idiots does he take us for?
If you ask me, the fact that Nazri had to make up bogus attacks so he could come up with such a ‘brilliant’ defence speaks once against to the clear guilt of the government with regards to the APCO issue.
And today?
Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz defended Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s “small fry” remark when describing the Cabinet’s inter-faith panel, saying the deputy prime minister was protecting it from religious groups rather than reducing its role.
Haihz.
Only a moron would think that the ’small fry’ remark was a sincere attempt at ‘protection’.
Muhyiddin has once again clearly shown his colours and exposed his agenda: to play his protector of Melayu/Islam versus Najib’s more ‘liberal’ 1Malaysia. He never seems to miss an opportunity – that greedy, ambitious fella.
Just a short post for this morning, hopefully more on Hulu Selangor later!
Sometimes, it’s like Nazri is trying to win a prize, or do a scientific experiment: just how stupid a thing can I say?
Not long ago, on the APCO issue:
Nazri said that the “Umno APCO” chants were serious allegation because it implied that the Malay ruling party was involved in corruption.
“APCO, UMNO APCO is a serious allegation. Umno is a member of the Barisan Nasional who employs APCO and is paying APCO RM28 million. To say that Umno is APCO and APCO is Umno that is to say that we are using government money to put into the coffers of Umno. Because if Umno is APCO it means that government knowingly employs APCO to pay APCO RM28 million when APCO belongs to Umno. It is a very serious allegation.
O.O
That is his reasoning? He was afraid YB Mahfuz would make people think APCO is owned by UMNO and thus the recipient of inappropriate funding from the government?? :| :|
I mean seriously. What kind of idiots does he take us for?
If you ask me, the fact that Nazri had to make up bogus attacks so he could come up with such a ‘brilliant’ defence speaks once against to the clear guilt of the government with regards to the APCO issue.
And today?
Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz defended Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s “small fry” remark when describing the Cabinet’s inter-faith panel, saying the deputy prime minister was protecting it from religious groups rather than reducing its role.
Haihz.
Only a moron would think that the ’small fry’ remark was a sincere attempt at ‘protection’.
Muhyiddin has once again clearly shown his colours and exposed his agenda: to play his protector of Melayu/Islam versus Najib’s more ‘liberal’ 1Malaysia. He never seems to miss an opportunity – that greedy, ambitious fella.
Just a short post for this morning, hopefully more on Hulu Selangor later!
No comments:
Post a Comment