Share |

Wednesday, 11 January 2012

Police involvement in ‘human safaris’ exposed in the Andaman Islands

Tourist films Jarawa on the Andaman Trunk Road
Tourist films Jarawa on the Andaman Trunk Road
© Survival
British newspaper The Observer has revealed evidence of police involvement in ‘human safaris’ in India’s Andaman Islands.
The scandal, first exposed by Survival in 2010, involves tourists using an illegal road to enter the reserve of the Jarawa tribe. Tour companies and cab drivers ‘attract’ the Jarawa with biscuits and sweets.
The Observer has obtained a video showing a group of Jarawa women being ordered to dance for tourists by a policeman, who had reportedly accepted a £200 bribe to take them into the reserve.
One tourist has previously described a similar trip: ‘The journey through tribal reserve was like a safari ride as we were going amidst dense tropical rainforest and looking for wild animals, Jarawa tribals to be specific’.
In recent weeks the Islands’ administration has again ruled out closing the road, known as the Andaman Trunk Road revealed for the first time that it plans to open an alternative route by sea to bypass most of the Jarawa reserve.
Tourists arriving at the Andaman Islands take flyers about the trunk road boycott
Tourists arriving at the Andaman Islands take flyers about the trunk road boycott
© SEARCH/Survival
Survival has called for tourists to boycott the road, which the Supreme Court ordered closed in 2002. Working with a local organization, SEARCH, Survival has distributed leaflets to tourists arriving at the Islands’ airport warning of the dangers of using the road.
Survival’s Director Stephen Corry said today, ‘This story reeks of colonialism and the disgusting and degrading ‘human zoos’ of the past. Quite clearly, some people’s attitudes towards tribal peoples haven’t moved on a jot. The Jarawa are not circus ponies bound to dance at anyone’s bidding.’

Indian breed Cows are most beneficial than foreign breeds. Save ‘Vechur’ and ‘Kasargode’ like Heritage Cow breeds. Stop Cow slaughter in India.


Indian breed Cows are most beneficial than foreign breeds. Holy Indian Cow breeds give us healthier, life-saving, most fortified and nectar like milk. Actually the cow progeny was considered as Cow-Wealth and it was considered as the back bone of Indian agriculture, health, economy and cultural development. Cows are considered so holy to all Arya-Hindu roots for ever and not to be killed anyway for any purpose. But for dismantle the Indian system, foreign breeds/products are imported in every respect for seed, cows, fertilizers, pesticides, day-to-day consumer products to weaken us in every foot-step. Why should we accept foreign things, while we may produce best from our soil and toil? Please take the vow to accept SWADESHI (Indigenous Breeds/Products) and arouse SWABHIMAN (Self Reliance) to make our MOTHERLAND as “World Mother” and the “Viswa Guru” (World Teacher). Read the following eye opener in the field of Indian breeds of Holy Cows. Vande Gomataram !! ~ Upananda Brahmachari.

Cattle class: native vs exotic

P. SAINATH || THE HINDU OPED || JANUARY 6, 2012

MOTHER AND CHILD: The mother Vechur cow is 82 cm tall. Vechur is the world’s smallest cattle breed. Photo : P. Sainath. Courtesy : The Hindu.
Kerala is feeling the ill-effects of an official policy that favoured disease-prone crossbreeds over low-maintenance native breeds.
Visitors flow in and out of Chandran Master’s compound in P. Vemballur, Thrissur, Kerala. Students, teachers, trainees in animal husbandry work and even officials walk around like it’s a public space. And in some ways, it is. People come a distance to see his 22 cows and two bulls — mostly from rare indigenous breeds. Also, the many kinds of mango, bamboo and fish he has cultivated, again species native to India. The former English teacher also boasts a classic Kathiawari horse and several native breeds of poultry. But the star attractions are the tiny Vechur — “the world’s smallest cow” — and other dwarf varieties of Kerala cattle.
The visitors’ interest also reflects a growing concern in the State about the fate of domestic breeds of cattle and other livestock. Like elsewhere, a strong emphasis on crossbred cattle that aimed at higher milk production also saw a sharp decline in native animals. There is now a serious debate on the results of that approach. Kerala’s cattle population declined by around 48 per cent between 1996 and 2007.

CHANGED STANCE

Dr. R. Vijayakumar, Director of Kerala’s Animal Husbandry Department (AHD), says the State’s new breeding policy “limits exotic [that is, non-native] germplasm to 50 per cent of cattle. We are now also propagating native breeds. We even conduct artificial insemination with the semen of native bulls.” And while the number of animals may have fallen between 1996 and 2007, “milk productivity of cows in the State rose in that period. From an average of six litres a day to 8.5 litres, even as crossbreeds came to account for 87 per cent of Kerala’s cattle.”
However, the cost of milk production is much higher with the crossbreeds. The feed requirement of native dwarf breeds like Vechur and Kasargode are very minor. Their feed-to-milk conversion is very good. The crossbreeds are high-maintenance animals and are disease-prone. “See this Vadakara Dwarf,” says Chandran Master. “I doubt I spend five to ten rupees on her feed daily. Still she gives me three to four litres. But the quality of her milk is highly prized and I could get Rs.50 a litre for it. So even in that way, the benefit is greater. There is no high standard of feed required either. Kitchen scraps and leftovers can be used. And they don’t require special sheds or anything.” He, however, does not sell milk. He does sell “very few calves each year when the numbers exceed my capacity to manage.”
Of the Vechur, he says its milk has medicinal qualities recorded by Ayurveda ages ago. In more recent times, studies at the Kerala Agricultural University have also shown the percentage of fats and total solids of the Vechur cow to be higher than that found in crossbred cows. The smaller size of the fat globules in the Vechur’s milk makes it more suitable for infants and the sick.
AHD Director R. Vijayakumar says the decline of native species had many causes. Not just the castrations of ‘non-descript’ varieties that had occurred in a much earlier period. He points to “the trend towards cash crops which brought about a decline in animal-based agriculture and to a younger generation of farmers with no time or patience for rearing large animals — they prefer smaller ruminants. And to a greater interest in crossbreeds due to their higher milk productivity.”

HARDY AND HEALTHY

But costs and maintenance are another matter. “Before I switched to local breeds in 1994,” says Chandran Master, “I had three crossbreds, including one Swiss Brown. I had to spend up to Rs.400 a day on each. The feed was very costly and over Rs.200 a day. Pellet feed, rice powder, wheat powder, oil cake, green grass, it’s endless. They would fall ill all the time and the vet was here every week, with each visit costing me Rs.150 apart from the expense of arranging a vehicle for him.”
Since making his switch: “No vet has attended my cows for 17 years. And I have not even insured a single one of them. These are hardy, healthy creatures.” And several experts do point out that India’s native cattle (Bos indicus) have evolved to cope with the climate and to “withstand diseases, parasites and calve easily without human assistance.” Scientists like Dr. Sosamma Iype, who pioneered the revival of the Vechur at KAU, also point out that these dwarf animals “have good resistance to foot and mouth disease and mastitis. Both, diseases which plague crossbred cows in Kerala. Vechur cattle also have a far lower incidence of respiratory infections.”
Most livestock owners in Kerala are either small or marginal farmers or even landless. The State has the highest percentage of crossbreeds in the country. And while its average milk yield has risen, production is far below demand. The State is not amongst the top producers in the country. Feed utilisation per litre of milk is also one of the highest in India. Critics say it’s wrong to ignore the steep fall in cattle numbers and native breeds that has hurt the State, alongside decades-old policies that made it illegal for a farmer to keep any bull without a licence for it. That licence is only granted at the level of State Director of the AHD.
Technically, Chandran Master and others are breaking the law. But surely the State has no way of knowing whether a farmer is keeping an “illegal” bull? “A hostile panchayat can make life hell for a farmer,” says one expert. “If that farmer is at odds with the ruling outfit of that panchayat, they can keep him in court for months.”

RED TAPE NIGHTMARE

Haritha Bhoomi (Green Earth) a journal on agriculture recently summed up the red tape involved in permissions of any kind: Say a farmer wishes to exceed the limit of six large animals and 20 head of poultry, even by a minor number. He needs clearances from the panchayat to just start the process. If you exceed the quota, you have to go to the Pollution Control Board. Depending on the size of the establishment you wish to build, you will need certificates from the District Town Planner. Perhaps even from the State Chief Town Planner. Manage to get these done and you have to prepare a technical report for the panchayat and get three or four certificates from them. Then the farmer must get clearances from the district medical officer to whom he has to submit NOCs from all residents within 100 metres of his planned farm.
On my first visit to Chandran Master’s home I had run into a Livestock Inspector (LI) from another region. Wishing to remain unnamed, he told me “On most of my visits I see the problems faced by the crossbreeds. They fall ill with the slightest change in climate. They cannot take the heat.” Chandran Master chipped in: “You cannot sleep one night peacefully. Crossbreds can’t stand ten minutes of rain. With local breeds, you don’t even need cowsheds.” The LI nodded: “If I keep a cow, it will be a Vechur.”
(PS: Following Thursday’s story in The Hindu, the Sahabaghya Vikash Abhiyan, a community-based body deeply involved in Kalahandi’s agriculture, has announced it will gift Chandran Master two calves of the rare Khariar breed. The challenge now is to transport them from western Orissa to Thrissur in Kerala.)

Muslim jailed for holding ex-wife prisoner on the toilet after blasting her western knickers as SATAN

  • Khalique Miah held Zahanara Begum in the bathroom for more than an hour
  • He then cut off her hair after criticising the highlights
Khalique Miah was jailed for 18 months at Snaresbrook Crown Court for the attack on his ex-wife
Khalique Miah was jailed for 18 months at Snaresbrook Crown Court for the attack on his ex-wife
A devout Muslim held his ex-wife prisoner on the toilet for an hour and physically assaulted her as punishment for wearing Western clothes.

Khalique Miah has been jailed for 18 months for the attack on Zahanara Begum.

She was on the loo when her former husband burst in dressed in black, wielding a hammer and referring to her underwear as 'Satan'.

Miah, 35, covered her mouth with a gloved hand to stop her screaming, punched her in the chest and stomach then climbed on top of her, holding her in place, Snaresbrook Crown Court heard.

He started haranguing her about her plucked eyebrows, shaved legs and highlighted hair, telling her she should not wear Western clothes and calling her knickers 'Satan'.

The couple’s three-year-old daughter woke up and started crying, but Miah refused to let Mrs Begum go and comfort her.

After an hour she begged for her freedom and he relented, telling her to get in the bath.

He then took her into the living room, where the father-of-two said her hair would have to go.

She agreed, not realising what he meant until he went into the kitchen, fetched a pair of scissors and started snipping it off into a carrier bag.

By this point it was nearly 3am, but Mrs Begum decided to wake the couple’s children in the hope their presence would stop Miah hurting her.

The defendant pocketed his ex-wife’s mobile phone, cut her landline and refused to let her leave the flat until 10am the next day, when she persuaded him she wanted to give the marriage another go.

He agreed to phone her family and when they arrived at the address in Whitechapel, East London, Mrs Begum asked them to call the police.

Miah admitted false imprisonment and assault causing actual bodily harm.

Passing sentence, Judge Simon Wilkinson said the victim had been through a 'terrifying ordeal' at the hands of her former husband.

He said: 'At 11pm, you arrived at her address unannounced and uninvited. You were dressed in black and carrying a hammer in the waistband of your trousers.

'You surprised her when she was sitting on the WC in her bathroom. She could not have been more vulnerable.

'You put your gloved hand over her mouth to stifle her screams then punched her and slapped her to the chest area.

'When you finally allowed her off the toilet seat you cut off her hair with a pair of scissors. You also cut her landline and took her mobile phone. Such conduct cannot and will not be tolerated.'

Miah, who works at Tesco in Bow, East London, has no previous convictions and had been on the supermarket’s fast-track management programme.

He was married to Mrs Begum for eight years and they had two children, now aged three and seven.

Mathew Dance, defending, said: 'He has indicated genuine remorse. He says he has learned his lesson.

'He wants to put all this behind him and get on with his life.'

Miah, of Whitechapel, pleaded guilty to false imprisonment and assault causing actual bodily harm.

Rakyat Malaysia tak bodoh tapi diperbodohkan

‘There’s still the sex video issue’

Singapore political analyst Bridget Welsh is skeptical about Anwar Ibrahim's victory and the BN government's apparent yielding to the ruling.

PETALING JAYA: It has been 14 years since the first sodomy charge was slapped against Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim and yesterday’s unexpected verdict has left analysts with mixed feelings.

Some believe that the government may finally end its persecution of Anwar as it has more to lose than gain by pursuing the matter, while others fear that another plan is underway to imprison him on a technicality.

Anwar, a former deputy prime minister, was yesterday acquitted and discharged from a sodomy charge – his second – levelled against him. The sodomy II case, which began in 2010, was brought against him by his former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari who is almost 40 years his junior.

In an immediate reaction Anwar, greeting thousands of supporters who thronged Jalan Duta Court Complex yesterday, said he was finally “vindicated”.

Being the galvanizing figure of a disparate opposition coalition, Anwar was credited for the 2008 political tsunami which saw Barisan Nasional lose five states – Kelantan, Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor – to the opposition DAP, PAS and PKR. BN wrested back Perak shortly after in a reverse takeover.

Since then Umno-led BN has been obsessed with discrediting Anwar and in the process has seen its own sway over voters, particularly the Malays, drop.

According to Ooi Kee Beng, Deputy Director of the Institute of Southeast Asia Studies, ISEAS, the BN government cannot afford to further persecute Anwar.

He opined that the persecution on the de-facto PKR head may end here as the BN government stands to lose further political clout if it continues to crucify the Permatang Pauh MP in the future.

Appeal unlikely

Ooi added that Anwar and this sodomy case would not drag on further as an appeal would not highlight any new aspects to the case which the the prosecution had already “failed” to establish during the year-long trial.

Asked if the issue of this sodomy case would be prolonged, Ooi answered in the negative.

“Of course the government can bring upon charges against him in the future but for this case, this is all they have and it failed.

“In order to appeal you need a good case you can’t just appeal for fun.

“The prosecution has done everything they could (during the trial) and yet they have failed.

“Anwar’s persecution has gone too far (and) in this time and age with all the information flow it will not work in their (the government’s) favour,” he told FMT.

Fellow political analyst, James Chin of Monash University also said that Anwar may be spared from further prosecution.

Chin indicated that the message from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) delivered through Information, Communications and Culture Minister Rais Yatim was a signal that there will be no further appeals on this case.

“There will be no appeal because PMO has already issued a statement declaring how the verdict has proven that the judiciary is independent,” said Chin.

AG yet to decide on appeal

In an immediate reaction to the verdict, Rais had in a statement declared that the verdict showed that the Malaysian judiciary was independent and “reputable”.

While calling for the verdict to be respected, Rais added that he was proud that the court had “discharged its duties without fear or favour”.

Yesterday FMT reported that the prosecution team has yet to decide if they will appeal the case.

Chief prosecutor Mohd Yusoff Zainal Abiden said they will wait for the written judgment before any decision is made to appeal the court ruling.

While complainant Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan is fervently hoping that they will appeal, many other parties, however, have voiced hope that the Attorney-General’s chambers will not waste more public funds by pursuing the matter.

Sex video issue

Meanwhile another political analyst Bridget Welsh said the celebrations over Anwar’s release may be short-lived.

“I don’t want to prejudge but there is always a possibility that this isn’t the last of the case.

“The second sodomy case has gone on for almost three years and was taken to court without concrete evidence so there is always a chance that it can be prolonged via the appeal process,” said Welsh, who is an an associate professor in political science at the Singapore Management University.

Welsh reminded that the smearing campaign and persecution is far from over, and Anwar has the sex-video scandal which surfaced last March.

“There is the sex video tape investigations that are still ongoing,” she said, referring to the revelation of a sex video by the trio dubbed ‘Datuk T’ of a man resembling Anwar allegedly having sex with a Chinese prostitute.

In the latest twist to the sex video issue, a probe was launched against Anwar last November after the investigating officer in the case, DSP Shanmugan Moorthy, lodged a police report that Anwar had knowingly given him false information, an offence under Section 182 of the Penal Code.

Anwar has claimed that the sex-video allegations are politically motivated and that this new twist, was a desperate attempt to “keep him busy” and imprison him.

Punca murtad: Kristianisasi atau diri sendiri?

Himpun mengaku bahawa kajian dan fakta di antara lain, menunjukkan bahawa majoriti punca murtad adalah disebabkan individu terbabit dibelenggu kemiskinan.
FEATURE

Bahagian Pertama

Himpunan Sejuta Umat Selamatkan Aqidah (Himpun) mengadakan himpunan ketiga mereka di Seremban semalam yang dihadiri oleh 3,000 umat Islam sekitar Negeri Sembilan.

Himpunan yang bermula 9.00 pagi itu berakhir empat jam kemudian. Antara barisan penceramah yang menyampaikan ucapan ialah Exco

Kerajaan Selangor Datuk Dr Hasan Ali, Bekas Mufti Negeri Sembilan Datuk Murtadza Ahmad, Pengerusi Himpun Azmi Abdul Hamid dan Timbalan Pengerusi Himpun Abdullah Zaik Abdul Rahman.

Semua penceramah menyampaikan ucapan dengan penuh bersemangat. Contohnya antara ucapan ringkas pengacara majlis dipetik berkata “Jangan cari pasal dengan Islam. Islam agama rasmi, Islam agama Malaysia”.

Di dalam Stadium Tertutup Kompleks Sukan Paroi, tempat berlangsungnya Himpunan tersebut terdapat banyak kain rentang dengan slogan seperti ‘Melayu di martabat, Islam hebat’; ‘Melayu sepakat, Islam berdaulat’; ‘Jangan permainkan agama Islam’ dan ‘Bersatu mempertahankan aqidah umat Islam dan institusi Raja’.

Intipati hampir kesemua penceramah tersebut adalah untuk memberitahu umat Islam bagaimana umat Islam kini di ancam dengan Gerakan Kristianisasi dan umat Islam perlu mempertahankan agama Islam dan aqidah mereka.

Memperkasa Islam

Dalam email yang pernah dihantar kepada media sebelum ini Himpun berkata perhimpunan itu dianjur untuk memperkasakan Islam, mempertahankan artikel 153 Perlembagaan Negara, cegah murtad dan menghapuskan usaha Gerakan Kristian menegakkan kerajaan Kristian.

Walaubagaimanapun ucapan Murtadza agak berlainan dan amat berbeza dengan ucapan penceramah-penceramah yang lain. Beliau menyentuh isu murtad di kalangan umat Islam dalam konteks hukum itu sendiri dan hujah beliau bersifat intelektual dan akademik.

Beliau melontarkan satu persoalan di luar kotak pemikiran yang setakat ini tidak pernah di sentuh olah mana-mana pihak termasuk pemimpin politik dari mana-mana parti termasuk Hasan sendiri yang merupakan pemimpin politik Islam paling lantang membincangkan isu Murtad dan gerakan Kristianisasi.

“Masa penjajahan dulu tidak murtad, masa sekarang kita murtad,” kata Murtadza.

Persoalan tersebut harus ditanya oleh umat Islam sendiri terutama pemimpin parti kerajaan kerana sejak merdeka selama 54 tahun merekalah yang berkuasa melaksanakan Undang-Undang Syariah, yang menguruskan Jabatan Agama Islam, Baitulmal, Pusat Zakat, masjid dan surau.

Apa yang menarik selain Murtadza, kesemua penceramah yang lain termasuk kepimpinan Himpun itu sendiri mengutarakan permasalahan dan punca utama murtad di kalangan umat Islam.

Sama ada di dalam ucapan mereka, mahu pun di dalam sidang akhbar, Himpun mengaku bahawa kajian dan fakta menunjukkan bahawa majoriti punca murtad adalah disebabkan individu yang terbabit dibelenggu dengan kemiskinan, berasal dari keluarga yang retak dan bermasalah dan juga kes-kes saudara baru yang akhirnya kembali ke agama asal kerana hilang tempat bergantung dan berada dalam keadaan yang terdesak kerana faktor kewangan.

Maka kepimpinan Himpun sedar atau tidak, masalah akar umbi umat Islam murtad adalah disebabkan oleh umat Islam dan agensi berkuasa agama Islam itu sendiri.

Kenyataan Himpun mengenai punca umat Islam murtad amat jelas menunjukkan berlaku kepincangan dalam sistem pentadbiran Jabatan

Agama Islam, Baitulmal, Pusat Zakat, Jawatankuasa masjid dan surau yang tidak menjalankan tugas dengan efektif sehingga mereka yang bermasalah dan tersepit dengan keadaan ekonomi akhirnya mencari bantuan dari pihak gereja.

Faktor Gerakan Kristianisasi hanya berlaku kemudian atau pada tahap kedua. Jika pada tahap pertama kesemua masalah yang membelenggu umat Islam dapat ditangani, tidak ada ruang untuk elemen Gerakan Kristianisasi itu berlaku sama sekali melainkan dalam kes terpencil seperti kes Lina Joy kerana faktor cinta.

Lima fokus

Dalam risalah yang diedarkan oleh Himpun terdapat lima fokus rancangan tindakan:

Apa tindakan terhadap pihak yang cuba memurtadkan umat Islam?
Apa tindakan terhadap pihak yang cuba mencemarkan Islam?
Apa tindakan terhadap umat Islam yang telah dimurtadkan oleh pihak tersebut?
Apa tindakan terhadap umat Islam yang memurtadkan diri sendiri?
Apa tindakan proaktif menangani kes murtad?

Malangnya tidak disebut apa tindakan untuk mencegah murtad atau mengelak murtad itu berlaku terlebih dahulu. Tidak juga disebut apa tindakan untuk mencari jalan penyelesaian apabila seorang umat Islam itu memilih untuk murtad.

Sebaliknya fokus hanya diberikan kepada tindakan apabila kes murtad itu telah pun berlaku bukannya sebelum berlaku.

Trend baru

Sementara itu Setiausaha Agung Himpun, Aminuddin Yahaya berkata berlaku trend baru dalam kes murtad membabitkan remaja perempuan Melayu yang berumur dari 20 hingga 25 tahun.

Aminuddin berkata trend baru itu melalui jaringan facebook.

“Mereka berkenalan dengan pemuda bukan Islam melalui laman facebook. Selepas berkenalan akhirnya mereka jatuh cinta dan murtad kerana mengikuti ajaran agama teman lelaki mereka,“ jelas Aminuddin.

Walaubagaimanapun apabila ditanya pihak media berapa ramai gadis Melayu murtad dengan trend sebegitu, Aminuddin berkata buat masa ini mereka masih belum mempunyai statistik lengkap.

Adalah diharap Himpun berbuat sesuatu untuk membantu dan mendidik umat Islam yang menghadapi kesusahan, kesempitan hidup dan keluarga bermasalah termasuk saudara baru dan orang Asli.

Jika ikhlas Himpun juga harus membantu menangani gejala sosial di kalangan remaja Melayu atau Islam yang ketika ini semakin kritikal.

Gejala bohsia, mat rempit, ketagih dadah, merokok, buang bayi, gay, pengkid, minum arak, hiburan melampau dan seks sebelum bernikah seperti tidak boleh dibendung lagi.

Masalah gejala sosial di kalangan remaja Islam lebih parah berbanding masalah murtad yang masih terkawal. Tiada maknanya Islam atas nama sahaja tetapi amalan dan gaya hidup lebih teruk dari Barat.

Jika Himpun benar-benar mempunyai bukti bahawa memang berlaku Gerakan Kristianisasi maka seharusnya semua bukti dan maklumat itu diberikan kepada Jabatan Agama Islam dan Jabatan Mufti untuk diambil tindakan kerana pihak ini yang sebenarnya mempunyai kuasa penguatkuasaan untuk melakukan pendakwaan dan bentuk tindakan.

Tidak salah Himpun menyerahkan tugas memulih akidah kepada NGO-NGO Islam tetapi sudah pasti ruang skop atau sumber NGO itu sendiri terhad dan terbatas.

Seharusnya Himpun, NGO dan Jabatan Agama Islam sendiri harus berganding bahu menyelesaikan masalah yang menyebabkan gejala murtad berlaku dan pencegahan dilakukan agar ianya terkawal.

Mahathir Launched ABU in 2008, Claims Raja Petra

(Malaysian Digest) - Self-exiled blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin yesterday claimed that former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed was the one who had 'launched' the ABU (Anyone But Umno) movement in 2008.

In his latest article in Malaysia Today, he said in 2008 Dr Mahathir had launched ABU when the latter told a press conference to not vote Umno in the 2008 general election.

Dr Mahathir was quoted as saying “vote anyone but Umno” when he met the Chinese association leaders and told them to support the opposition, especially in Penang, then prome minister Tun Abdullah Badawi’s home state, resulting in the opposition taking over that state.

“I don’t care whether Dr Mahathir is sincere about supporting the opposition or whether he had ulterior motives – such as to bring Abdullah Badawi down.

“Dr Mahathir’s charity is not my concern. How the opposition can benefit by Dr Mahathir becoming Umno’s enemy is. And that is what I focused on," said Raja Petra who is also the editor and founder of the Malaysia Today portal.

In May 2008, Dr Mahathir along with fellow Umno veteran Tan Sri Sanusi Junid announced that they are quitting Umno.

Dr Mahathir Mohamad announced his decision, citing a lack of confidence in the current leadership of then prime minister Abdullah.

Mahathir had been critical of his appointed successor Abdullah or fondly known as Pak Lah, blaming him for the party's disappointing performance in the 12th general election where Umno and Barisan Nasional (BN) won the March 8 election with a simple majority, and saw four more states join Kelantan under Opposition rule.

Zaid Ibrahim: “It will get better”

LAWYER-turned-politician Datuk Mohd Zaid Ibrahim, 60, knows that politics can be a dirty game. He joined Umno and won the Kota Baru parliamentary seat in the 2004 general election. The party did not field him for the 2008 elections, however. After winning with a severely reduced majority, the ruling coalition under Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi nevertheless appointed Zaid senator and minister in the prime minister’s department.
As minister, Zaid made the headlines when he advocated a restoration of judicial independence, and opposed Malay supremacy and the abuse of the Internal Security Act (ISA), among others. In fact, his resignation as minister in September 2008 in protest of the ISA made headlines everywhere. He was subsequently sacked from Umno for being too chummy with the federal opposition, and joined Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) in 2009.
(All pics courtesy of Zaid Ibrahim)
In April 2010, he was fielded as PKR’s candidate for the Hulu Selangor parliamentary by-election. Almost immediately, he was attacked by the Umno-owned media for drinking alcohol, and subsequently lost. Later that year, Zaid contested in the PKR party polls for the deputy presidency, but eventually withdrew from the race and party, alleging that PKR’s leadership condoned malpractice. In December 2010, he was elected to lead political party Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia and renamed it Kesejahteraan Insan Tanah Air.
Zaid sat down with The Nut Graph for this exclusive interview in Petaling Jaya on 18 March 2010, back when he was still with PKR and gearing up for Hulu Selangor.
TNG: When and where were you born?
I was born in Kampung Chap, which is about 30km from Kota Baru, in 1951, after the (Second World) War. But it is in the district of Bachok.
Are there any stories from your parents or grandparents that made you the person you are today?
I think I had quite a free childhood, in the sense that I did not have that many restrictions, other than the chores I had to do. For example in Kota Baru, my father was working in a kedai kopi, and I would work helping him out, cleaning up dishes.
I used to sell ice cream, just to make some money after school. I mean, selling ice cream is a tough job, because you have to go around and if your friends see you, it’s quite embarrassing. But after a while you just take it in your stride.
But Kota Baru was also a nice place then because there was a lot of freedom.
And at that time it was already under PAS rule, wasn’t it?
Yes, but it was different. I mean, you had nightclubs. The elites would go to Prince Hotel, and I would just sit downstairs and listen to the music. You could hear [music], and you could see people wearing bow ties; they were very English those days, the elites of Kelantan. It was not a sleepy town at all.
Family portrait with Zaid as a boy
Family portrait with Zaid as a boy
Did your father have any political inclinations?
My father was a PAS supporter. He introduced me to political ceramah. But he wasn’t an activist, like a card-carrying member. He was just a supporter of (former PAS president Tan Sri Mohd) Asri (Muda) in those days.
Until his death, he was always a PAS member, and he was always critical of me being in Umno. My father said to me, “Why do people go to university?” I said, “So that you can get a job or something.” He said, “No, so that you can think.” He was being sarcastic, you see, because [to him], if you can think then why would you want to join Umno? (chuckles)
My mother was a strong Umno [supporter]. [Most] of the time my father was PAS, she was Umno. That was a common thing in Kelantan. Families were divided.
It was not a cause to disown half the family?
No, that was later. Those extreme political views became more prevalent in the [1980s], not in the [1960s].
Would you say you are ideologically consistent even though now you are in a different party?
Ya, it is more about how you are going to achieve [your] objective. I once thought that the transformation would only happen if you were from within.
On the issue of [Malay] privileges, I have always had the same stand even in Umno. At some point, Mahathir seemed to have had that view, but he always flip flops depending on what he [wants to achieve]. You know, when he said, “We don’t need crutches” and all that, I thought that was very bold on his part, and I was very supportive.
You see, the problem with privileges is that if you distort the message, if you give a false message, it becomes counter-productive, [and] it becomes a problem, even for the recipient. You see [that now there is confusion between] privileges and rights, which is the crux of the discourse today – that Malay [Malaysians] are being told by Umno that they have special rights.
So if you have special rights, why do you bother to do anything? You just ask for this, ask for that. But Malay [Malaysians] actually don’t have special rights, they have privileges in certain situations. And that’s not supposed to be permanent; it’s supposed to depend on situations. It may last a long time, or it may not last a long time.
But now it has become “rights”. It’s like, “We have more rights than you.” And that sort of fallacy or myth is counter-productive, because not only is it not true, it’s wrong. It also is divisive. And what for?
The only reason I can think of is that it makes Umno politicians have this convenient tool, this popularity, as the defender of so-called “rights”. And they would be indispensable. But if somebody else comes to power, they would be exposed.
Zaid receiving a prize when he was in Standard 6
Zaid receiving a prize when he was in Standard 6
But even two years ago when (Selangor Menteri Besar) Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim suggested opening up Mara University of Technology to non-Malay Malaysians, the backlash was fantastic.
If you read Utusan Malaysia, Berita Harian and watch TV3, of course it looks like a backlash. But if you talk to Malay [Malaysians] in a sensible way and explain to them why competition in Mara would be good for them, I’m sure they would accept it.
I mean, Malay [Malaysians] are not mad, you know. They are sensible people. Umno is mad.
Another thing you’ve been consistent on is the policing of people’s personal beliefs and religious expression. [...] When you were running as an Umno Member of Parliament in Kota Baru, one of the things you did was you actually went to the ground to explain something to the people.
Yes, it was in 2004, because there was this massive controversy about my taking action against hudud (Islamic criminal law) [in Kelantan]. Muslims were all riled up, saying that I opposed the implementation of hudud.
I had to explain to people in Kota Baru the action by PAS to pass that law in 1993. I took up [legal] action [against Kelantan’s PAS government] only in the year 2000 or 2001.
I was more interested as a lawyer, and I think that people should understand that whatever you want to do in this country you have to do by constitutional means. If you don’t follow the constitution, then we’ll be in chaos. So whether it is Islamic or whatever, you still have to follow the law, the constitution.
So I filed the action to get the Federal Court to determine whether state legislatures are competent to legislate on criminal matters. And my view is that they cannot. If they cannot, then the enactment is null and void.
But Umno opposed my action. That is the irony of it all. And they had to ask me to withdraw because they didn’t want to be seen as opposing hudud.
But this is how this country is run. [Nobody] wants to face the facts. On the one hand, you have PAS, which portrays itself as Islamic and therefore wants to implement this law. On the other hand, Umno was not keen to be seen to be opposing it, because it’s Islamic law. But I don’t think this is how this country should be run. This country should be run in an honest way.
So you have to tell them that the way to do it is, when you have enough seats in Parliament, then you can amend the constitution. I’m not saying that you should, but if you want to do it, then you should do it that way.
So I explained my position to the people of Kota Baru and I won. And some people told me I will not succeed if this is my style of politics. But I said success is for me to define. If I think that in my involvement in all these political matters, I have managed to transform a bit, if not all, then that is success to me.
With PAS leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat
With PAS leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat
In all your interviews and writings, you come off as an optimist all the time. Do you think it will get worse [in Malaysia] before it gets better?
Oh, I think it’s already very bad.
(Laughs) Can it get worse?
No, it will get better. I don’t think there’s any country in the world today that’s so backward, not in a material sense, but backward in terms of our values. We have racist newspapers like Utusan Malaysia. We have ministers making statements that are totally ridiculous. We have racist statements coming from everywhere. The worst that you can think of has now been spewed out. I don’t think we can get any worse, and so it can only get better. I still believe that people are smarter than we sometimes give them credit for.
While I am optimistic, I am not unrealistic. I know the message may not get through, the understanding may be warped, the playing field might be uneven, [those in power] might rig [election] results, anything can happen. It’s not going to be smooth. But at the end of the day, I think the people will prevail…
People know what’s going on in the world. It’s not like the days when I was young when I didn’t know what was going on in the world.
But as an optimist, is there anything that you still grapple with? Perhaps as a Malay [Malaysian], or a leader?
My concern is that people don’t get the facts right. They don’t get the message right [because we don’t have the means to communicate with them].
Can you visualise a Malaysia you want to leave behind for your grandchildren and their grandchildren?
Yes, [for] prosperity to be for all. This country is rich enough for everyone. This country is structured on the basis of respect for freedom, liberty – these are words used in the constitution. And these are not concepts that are archaic. These are eternal, right from the time of the Greeks.
And I think Muslims and Malay [Malaysians] want to live in peace and with respect with other communities. They just want a fair share of the cake. They don’t want any abuse, because that is what Islam asks them to do, to be fair. A Muslim’s primary duty, apart from obligations to God, is to create a just society in this world. You know, when you are in school, the ustaz will tell you that. This is not your world, it is God’s world.

Rakaman 901 Di Sekitar Jalan Duta Dan Kediaman DSAI

Anwar’s acquittal a victory for justice but not yet a triumph for the justice system

By Lim Kit Siang,

I had in my first response to Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s acquittal from Sodomy II charges yesterday said that it was a victory for justice.

There was immediate response from detractors accusing me of double standards, alleging that I would regard the justice system as fair and just when Anwar is freed but the opposite if Anwar is imprisoned.

These detractors have got me wrong. Anwar’s acquittal was a victory for justice but not yet a triumph for the justice system.

Just as a swallow does not make a summer, the justice system in Malaysia has a very long way to go despite the Anwar Sodomy II acquittal to restore national and international confidence in its in efficiency, independence and integrity.

In acquitting Anwar, Judge Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah cited the possibility that the DNA samples were compromised and the lack of corroborative evidence. On these grounds alone, Anwar should never had been charged in this first place. Furthermore, Anwar’s defence should not have been called at the end of the prosecution case.

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin today joined the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and the Information, Communications and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr. Rais Yatim to proclaim that Anwar’s acquittal was proof of the independence of the judiciary in Malaysia and would increase the confidence of Malaysians and international community in Najib’s transformation promises.

Such claims and proclamations are most fragile.

Firstly, it will not be easily forgotten that the crisis of confidence in the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law reached a new climax under Najib’s premiership, when he orchestrated the unconstitutional coup d’etat and power grab in Perak state which was given legitimacy by compromised and subservient judiciary.

Secondly, such claims would be instantly destroyed if Anwar is subject to new and further persecutions, whether in a decision to appeal against Anwar’s acquittal or to harass him with new charges.

I call on Najib to end all gutter politics and character assassination of political opponents and the politics of lies and hate, which of late has poisoned Malaysian politics and the nation-building process – as for instance the incessant lies trying to portray the DAP as anti-Malay, anti-Islam and anti-Malay Rulers.

Let the battle for the hearts and minds of the voters be on policies and programmes and not on character-assassination, lies and falsehoods.

Anwar’s acquittal yesterday has given hope that the decay of key national institutions have not reached the point of no return and that it is possible to effect changes and reforms from within the present system – although there can be no better surety of fundamental reforms of key national institutions than to bring about a change of federal power in Putrajaya in the next general elections.

Anwar’s acquittal is likely to affect Najib’s time-table for the holding of the next general elections as the possibility of dissolution of Parliament immediately after the Chinese New Year has receded into the background.

This is probably why Parliament has announced the dates for the new Parliamentary calender this year – with official opening of Parliament by the Yang di Pertuan Agong on March 12 starting a 20-day meeting for Dewan Rakyat from March 12 to April 12, 2012; a second parliamentary meeting of 12 days from 11th June to 28th June and a 34-day 2013 Budget meeting from Sept. 24 to Nov. 27, 2012.

As of now, I expect the March meeting of Parliament to be held but not the June meeting, as otherwise the “feel good” feeling generated from Najib’s 2012 Budget “goodies” would have been completely dissipated.

Independence of judiciary proven


by HEMANANTHANI SIVANANDAM

> Verdict shows neither politics nor politicians have influence over dispensation of justice: Najib 

PETALING JAYA: Barisan Nasional leaders said the verdict in the Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim sodomy trial proves that the judiciary is independent, as opposed to what is alleged by opposition leaders.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said yesterday’s court ruling has seen the government cleared once and for all of the many baseless accusations of political interference and conspiracy against the opposition leader. 

“Today’s verdict shows once again that, despite what many have claimed, the Malaysian judiciary is an independent institution where neither politics nor politicians have any influence over the dispensation of justice,” he said. 

Najib said this further strengthens the clear separation of powers of each branch of the Malaysian government, with neither branch interfering with the workings of the other.

“As head of the executive branch, I respect the decisions of the other branch of government, the judiciary,” the prime minister said in a statement issued after his return yesterday from a visit to South Africa.  

The High Court acquitted and discharged Anwar, 64, on a charge of sodomising his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, 26, in 2008. Najib said this case was brought by a private individual and it was important that he had his accusations heard in court. “Far from being a politicallymotivated prosecution, it has been an unwelcome distraction from the serious business of running our country in the interests of the people,” he said. 

* Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz told theSun that the decision proves what the Opposition has claimed is wrong.

“Unlike them (the Opposition), we respect the decision of the judge. All this while, they have said our judiciary 
is not fair but now it is proven that the courts are very independent.”

* Deputy Higher Education Minister Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah: “As lawabiding citizens, the outcome of the trial must be accepted and respected.” On claim of an unfair judiciary system, he said: “I have always respected the judiciary institution so there is no question on its independence.”

Kota Belud MP Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan said the decision is vindication for the judiciary. Although the prosecution has the right to appeal the verdict, Abdul Rahman however felt that the country needs closure and should move on.

“We now need to focus on nation building. I personally believe although law provides for appeal, looking at the bigger picture, the court decided that there was not enough evidence and so because of that, Anwar was acquitted. 

“How are you going to appeal on that basis unless there is new evidence presented.”

* Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam tweeted: “The verdict on Anwar should put an end to all accusations of a manipulated judiciary.”

* Gerakan deputy president Datuk Chang Ko Youn in a statement called on Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders to apologise to the public for “the wild and baseless allegations made against the judiciary and the government with regard to the trial”.

“It is only fair they apologise to the public because over the past three years, they have made wild, spurious and unfounded allegations against the judiciary and government of manipulating the judicial process.”

* Information, Communications and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim said the verdict shows that the country’s judiciary is independent and able to deliver judgment without fear or favour. 

“The judgment has been made, and with this, it is proven that the country’s judiciary is reputable, and its judgments are on par with those made in the developed countries, which are based on the rule of law,” he said.

In a statement issued earlier, Rais noted Anwar’s acquittal proved that the government did not hold sway over judges’ decisions. 

* Land and Regional Development Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal said the verdict proved that the judiciary is independent and there is no interference from the authorities. 

BN Feels No Pressure With Court's Decision On Anwar Ibrahim's Case

PUTRAJAYA, Jan 10 (Bernama) -- Barisan Nasional (BN) feels no fear nor pressure at all with the Kuala Lumpur High Court's decision yesterday to acquit and discharge opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim of sodomising his former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

Dismissing such insinuations, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said BN had bravely gone through 12 general elections before and was prepared for the coming one, expected to be held this year.

Muhyiddin, who is also Umno deputy president and BN deputy chairman, said the experience gained all this while would assist the BN election machinery in facing the coming general election.

"There's no pressure. Who says we are under pressure? Whatever the decision, it was the court's. We prepare for the elections not because we are under pressure, then only we get cracking. But we have been working as usual.

"We have gone through the general election not once, but it's going to be for the 13th time. We have a lot of experience. So, we are not under pressure in this matter. We will face it no matter what the situation is."

Muhyiddin said this after delivering a special address to officers and staff of the Educaton Ministry at the Putrajaya International Convention Centre, today.

He said BN respected the court's decision on Anwar's sodomy case and stressed that the judiciary had always been independent in making decisions, without any interference from outside, including political parties.

He said the court's decision too would definitely raise public confidence in the country's democratic practices pillared by the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary without interfering with each other's jurisdiction.

He added that yesterday's court decision also proved the transparency of the country's system of democracy to the outside world.

Muhyiddin believed that after this, no quarters including the opposition would accuse the BN government of injustice for what was happening in the country.

"I believe the court's decision would also convince Malaysians and the international community on the earnestness of the government led by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak in bringing the national transformation process to a higher level.

"This already could be seen at the Kuala Lumpur High Court yesterday," he said.

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

Five Men On Trial In Derby For Urging Execution Of Gays

Jscales Of Justice
Five men are to go on trial on Monday accused of stirring up hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation in the first prosecution of its kind.

Ihjaz Ali, 42, Mahboob Hassain, 45, and Umer Javed, 38, first appeared in court last January to face the charges.

Two other men, Razwan Javed, 28, and Kabir Ahmed, 27, were also charged with the same offence.

The charges related to an allegation that the men handed out a leaflet called "The Death Penalty?" outside a mosque in Derby, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said.

The leaflet is understood to have called for homosexuals to be executed.

CPS lawyer Sue Hemming said: "The charges relate to the distribution of a leaflet, "The Death Penalty?", outside the Jamia Mosque in Derby in July 2010 and through letterboxes during the same month.

"This is the first ever prosecution for this offence and it is the result of close working between the Crown Prosecution Service and Derbyshire Police."

The men will go on trial at Derby Crown Court today.

Ali, Hassain and Umer Javed are charged with three counts each of an offence of sending letters with intent to cause distress or anxiety under section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988, the CPS said.

Ali is also charged with three offences, contrary to section 5 (b) of the Public Order 1986, in relation to the distribution of leaflets outside the Jamia Mosque.

He faces a further four counts of distributing threatening written material intending to stir up hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation, contrary to section 29C (1) of the Public Order Act 1986.

Hassain and Umer Javed are both also charged with two counts each contrary to section 29C (1) of the Public Order Act 1986.

Razwan Javed and Ahmed are both charged with one count each contrary to section 29C (1) of the Public Order Act 1986.

Pandangan dari pemimpin-pemimpin Pakatan

Acquitting Anwar clears way for reforms, says Wall Street Journal

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 10 — The court’s acquittal of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim from a sodomy charge yesterday is good news for Malaysia and its prospects of becoming a more mature, resilient democracy, the Wall Street Journal said today in an editorial.
The respected international newspaper also pointed out that Malaysia had avoided the consequences of a guilty verdict — domestic polarisation and foreign outrage.
Crucially, the newspaper said the verdict would pave the way for the reform of Umno and the country.
Anwar addressing the crowd soon after his acquittal on January 9, 2012. — Picture by Jack Ooi
The editorial pointed out that the court’s verdict means Barisan Nasional (BN) would now have to face a charismatic Anwar on the stump in the next elections. “But that is preferable to facing him as an imprisoned martyr.”
Anwar, 64, had been charged with sodomising his former male aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, 26, at a posh condominium in upscale Damansara Heights here four years ago, the second time in his political career. He spent six years in jail before being exonerated in 2004.
Political analysts told The Malaysian Insider yesterday that with the end of the sodomy trial, the two political rivals could now focus their attention on the economy and reforms needed to ensure Malaysia remains competitive.
“The next election will now be fought on policy issues, on alternatives of how the country can be further governed and developed, and on quality instead of sensational issues.
“The positive outcome of the case evens out the playing field,” Ibrahim Suffian from the Merdeka Center told The Malaysian Insider yesterday.
Ibrahim and other analysts believe that yesterday’s verdict gives Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak a chance to reclaim the middle ground of Malaysian politics, after major inroads were made by Pakatan Rakyat parties in Election 2008.
The Wall Street Journal appeared to agree with the argument in its editorial today.
It said Najib’s biggest hurdle to winning votes was the “famous cynicism” among Malaysians that he could carry out his economic and government reform pledges.
“Prime Minister Najib Razak faces the difficult job of reforming Umno before he can reform Malaysia,” the paper said, adding that “many Malaysians who would like to support him as the best hope for reforming the country without the risk of race riots are having second thoughts.”
Najib is also the president of Umno, the lynchpin party in the BN coalition.
The WSJ said voters, especially from among the Chinese and Indian minorities, were now drawn to Islamist opposition party PAS which had shown it has reformed after it “purged” the radical voices from within its ranks and installed leaders who had shown good governance in the states they controlled.
“If it is to stay in power, Umno must now follow suit and rid itself of its old guard, who depend on Malaysia’s system of racial preferences to get rich and grease their patronage networks,” the newspaper said.
It said that Election 2008 had given rise to an urban middle class that no longer votes according to racial lines, which it said meant Umno’s vote bank was no longer the Malay rural vote.
“Younger and better educated voters are turned off by racial chauvinism and political dirty tricks of the type represented by Sodomy II,” the newspaper said.

DPM: Najib’s the winner in Anwar’s acquittal

The court's decision to free the opposition leader was a continuation of PM Najib's transformation programme.
FMT ALERT
PUTRAJAYA: Confidence and support towards the Najib administration will grow following the acquittal of Anwar Ibrahim, Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin said today.
He said the court’s decision to free the opposition leader was a continuation of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s transformation programme as it indicated the judiciary’s independence as well as non-interference from the executive.
The acquittal also invalidated Anwar’s claim of a top level conspiracy behind the charges, Muhyiddin added, echoing the immediate reaction of other Barisan Nasional leaders to the High Court’s verdict yesterday to acquit Anwar.
“I am certain that the decision will boost the confidence of Malaysians and the international community in Najib’s persistence in leading the country’s transformation process into a better future,” Muhyiddin told a press conference at the Putrajaya International Convention Centre here today.

Abductions of Hindu girls, forced conversions to Islam, on the rise in Pakistan

Bharti, A 15 year-old, is the 18th Hindu girl to have been reportedly abducted, forced to convert to Islam, and forced to marry a Muslim man, in the Lyari area of Karachi, a city in the south of Pakistan, the Express Tribune of India reported yesterday. The real number is probably much higher. In 2009, in the province of Sindh 18 Hindu girls had also been kidnapped.   

The family of the teenage girl filed a complaint with Bhagdadi police station, and a court hearing has begun. On the first day of the hearing Bharti -- who has been renamed Ayesha, apparently after the favorite wife of Islam's prophet Mohammed -- appeared "clad in a black 'abaya' " and hardly acknowledged her parent's presence.

According to The Times of India, her father "[Narain] Das brought a copy of the National Database and Registration Authority's record, which states that his daughter is 15 years old. However, certificates of her conversion to Islam and her marriage claim she is 18."

It is common in cases of child abduction and forced marriage for the age of the child bride to changed, and for the child to be made much older than is the case. 

At the launch of its "Perils of Faith" report on the threats to minority religions in pakistan, a spokesperson for the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said “they kidnap girls who are younger than 15 but they say they are adults and that the girls have accepted Islam and been married of their own free will."

The HRCP said that Hindus receive no support in pakistan, and that the "conversion issue is not acceptable, it has discouraged Hindus in Pakistan.”

Nigeria's descent into holy war

A wave of terrorist violence across Nigeria has raised fears of an alliance between the Islamist Boko Haram movement and al-Qaeda's franchise in the Sahara. Colin Freeman reports from the Boko Haram stronghold of Maiduguri. 
Cars allegedly destroyed in army reprisals against residents of Maiduguri for failing to alert them to Boko Haram attacks
Cars allegedly destroyed in army reprisals against residents of Maiduguri for failing to alert them to Boko Haram attacks Photo: TOM SAATER/DEMOTIX

Like many other Christian outposts in the spiritual homeland of Nigeria's "Taliban", the Victory Baptist Church in the northern desert city of Maiduguri no longer just relies on God for protection.

A modest whitewashed spire in a skyline dominated by mosques, for the last month it has had a military guard to defend it from Boko Haram, the militant local Islamist sect blamed for a string of terror attacks nationwide in recent weeks.

The soldiers in the sandbagged machinegun nest outside the church, though, were unable save three members of the flock last week.

On Wednesday evening, three days after Boko Haram ordered all Christians to leave Muslim-dominated northern Nigeria for good, Ousman Adurkwa, a 65-year-old local trader, answered the door of his home near the church to what he thought was an after-hours customer. Instead it was two masked gunmen.

"They shot my father dead, and then came for the rest of the family," Mr Adurkwa's other son Hyeladi, 25, told The Sunday Telegraph the following day. "One chased my brother Moussa and killed him, and the other shot at me, but my mother took the bullet in the stomach instead."

Hyeladi spoke as weeping parishioners gathered for an impromptu memorial service in the Adurkwa family compound, where the parlour carpet was still stained with blood from the gunshot wound suffered by Mrs Aduwurka, 50, who now lies in hospital.

But while the sermon from the local pastor, Brother Balani, urged "prayers for those who God has taken away, and comfort for those who remain", it diplomatically avoided the more earthly question of who actually did it.

For one thing, no-one can be sure the killing was not simply the result of a private feud. And for another, Boko Haram, whose name means "Western education is sinful", and which wants hardline Sharia law across the whole of Nigeria, has a track record of killing anyone who points the finger at them publicly.

Yet some of the Adurkwa family's neighbouring Christian households have already made up their mind, fleeing the district for fear they might be next.

"We are going through a very difficult time because of Boko Haram," said Joseph Adams, 30, who lives nextdoor to the Aduwurkas. "Two weeks ago a nearby church was also burned down, and nine other Christians have been killed. Now all the houses around me are emptying."

Whether such killings really do herald the start of a pogrom of Christians remains in dispute. The Nigerian government, which is facing criticism for failing to curb Boko Haram's reign of terror, insists last week's threats were simply bluster, despite the deaths of some 23 Christians in two further attacks elsewhere in northern Nigeria on Thursday and Friday.

What is less in doubt is the alarming evolution of the sect, which has progressed from using machetes and poisoned arrows in its infancy to sophisticated carbombs and Mumbai-style mass gun attacks today.

Started as a religious study group in Maiduguri more than 15 years ago, it first took up arms under the leadership of a firebrand former civil servant, Mohammed Yusuf, and focused its wrath mainly against the Nigerian government, which it accused of neglecting the dirt-poor Muslim north.

Today, however, it is believed to be morphing into a new pan-African jihadist franchise, forging links with both al-Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb, which operates in the vast Sahara region north of Nigeria, and al-Shebab in Somalia.

Last August, in what diplomats fear may signal a campaign against Western interests in oil-rich Nigeria, it killed 24 people with a car bombing of the United Nations building in the capital, Abuja.

But what is causing even more worry is its parallel lurch into more sectarian violence, aggravating historic tensions between the Christian south and the Muslim north, and potentially destabilising West Africa's biggest and most powerful nation.

That new agenda was spelt out with a brutal sense of occasion on Christmas Day, when a car bomb killed 42 worshippers at morning mass at St Theresa's Catholic Church in Madalla, just outside Abuja.

Among the bereaved was Steady Esiri, who rushed to the scene to find a charred corpse wearing the distinctive Sunday best dress of his pregnant wife Uche, 26. Her eight-month old foetus had been torn from her womb.

"We were supposed to attend Mass together, but I was busy and planned to go the evening service instead," he said. "Then I heard a huge explosion, and when I rushed here I recognised her dress. She was a wonderful woman, a perfect housewife, now I will have to start my life again. What kind of people do this for political ends?"

For the Reverend Isaac Achi, who feared his 3,500 strong congregation might carry out reprisals against local Muslims, it was cause for a heartfelt sermon the following day reminding them of the Christian virtue of forgiveness.

"I told them revenge would just increase the number of souls dying on both sides," he said last week, looking out over church's wrecked facade, where Christmas decorations still hung lopsidedly. "But if the government cannot stop this kind of thing, I will be worried about the future of Nigeria."

For some Christian leaders, however, the time for meekness is over. In comments that angered Muslim leaders, the president of the Christian Association of Nigeria, the Reverend Ayo Oritsejafor, branded the attacks a "declaration of war" against Christians, and warned that they would "have no choice but to respond appropriately " if the authorities failed to stop them.

Responding to the crisis last weekend, Nigeria's president, Goodluck Jonathan, declared a state of emergency throughout selected northern areas, including Maiduguri, a dusty frontier town near the border with Chad.

Troops, tanks and pick-up trucks of menacing-looking plain clothes police have flooded the city's sandy, unpaved boulevards, where motorbikes - long the favourite method for Boko Haram's hit and run attacks - have long been banned. Nevertheless, an air of menace remains, with the 6pm curfew enforced not just by the soldiers, as by the knowledge that the sect generally mounts attacks from late afternoon onwards. When The Sunday Telegraph visited last week, explosions and gunfire were heard during the hours of darkness.

Pacifying the city has been made harder by the local hostility to the security forces, whose heavy-handed approach has won few hearts and minds over the years.

In 2009, more than 700 people were killed when troops fought a five day battle against Boko Haram followers which culminated in the capture of their leader, Mr Yusuf. But the government's victory was marred by reports that he was summarily executed in police custody, a move that galvanised Yusuf supporters to regroup, and put some locals off cooperating with the authorities.

Last week, The Sunday Telegraph saw one street littered with burned out cars - allegedly set fire to by soldiers after locals failed to warn them of a bomb attack.

"They were angry because we did not give them any information," said one man, afraid to give his name. "But if we do, the sect will come after us. We're stuck in the middle."

Maiduguri, however, is not the only flashpoint city in the region, and nor do Muslim extremists have a monopoly on aggression. In the religiously mixed city of Jos, north of Abuja, Christians are held equally to blame for clashes that have claimed several thousand lives in the last decade alone.

The city, said to be an acronym for "Jesus Our Saviour", sits atop a balmy plateau that provides prime farming land and was once a favoured retreat for British colonials escaping the humid malarial climes of coastal Lagos. But it is jealously regarded as a historic fiefdom by the Christian Berom tribe, who still view the Muslim Hausas who came here a century ago as interlopers, despite having sold them much of their land.

On a walk through Jos's Bukuru district, scene of Muslim-Christian clashes which claimed 150 lives two years ago, the conflicting visions become clear. While the two groups still live side by side in dense shanty towns, patches of no-go-areas abound for each, and no two accounts of how 2010's bloodshed arose are alike.

"It is the Berom who cause the problems, trying to get their land back," said Mohamed Yakuba, 32, gesturing to a row of burned-out houses where his father and eight other relatives died during the clashes.

True, he is still on good terms with his Berom neighbour John Jang, who also lost his home. But when asked for his version of events, Mr Jang insists: "The Birom were simply retaliating for attacks that the Hausa started."

Yet while most Berom and Hausa still muddle along together in every day life - urged on by street posters saying "Stop this wickedness" - some of the Jos's politicians have a less compromising view. None more so than Toma Davou, 73, the Scripture-quoting leader of the Berom parliamentary forum, who greets foreign visitors to Jos by saying "Welcome to Beromland".

"The Hausas want to push us out, and although it is about land occupation, they say it is religious so that they can get the sympathy of Saudi Arabia and al-Qaeda," said Mr Davou. "Christians should arm to the teeth to meet this threat from them and Boko Haram."

Mr Davou is now campaigning for Nigeria to divide into separate Muslim and Christian states, a move that for many would evoke memories of the Biafran civil war of the 1960s.

The Nigerian government dismisses such talk, pointing out that the vast majority of its 150 million citizens get on with one another peaceably, but there is less clarity on the remedy for Boko Haram and al Qaeda, its new ally.

Some Nigerian officials even question whether the sect really exists, saying much of the havoc in Maiduguri is the work of criminal gangs who use its name to frighten people.

But others are convinced that Boko Haram's relationship is indeed having a fledgling relationship with al-Qaeda - not least Robert Fowler, a Canadian diplomat kidnapped by Al Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb while serving with the UN in Niger in 2008.

The gang who held him in the Sahara for 130 days repeatedly told him of their aim to destroy governments across central Africa as a precursor to establishing a pan-African caliphate. And among their number, they also included a Nigerian.

"It would be an obvious partnership to form, even if there isn't any hard evidence yet," Mr Fowler said. "The world should be worried, because Nigeria is a huge country, and if it implodes it will take the rest of West Africa with it."

Sodomy II verdict: Anwar NOT guilty!

Anwar’s victory belongs to Najib

Political observers say that while Anwar is a free man, Najib has also exited the trial relatively unscathed.

PETALING JAYA: Political observers believe that the unexpected freedom granted to Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim is a stronger boost to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s image than to Pakatan Rakyat’s reformasi momentum.

Anwar walked away a free man from his second sodomy trial this morning after two years of court battles and the verdict has caught many by surprise.

But as the thousands of supporters outside the Kuala Lumpur High Court rejoiced, political pundits noted that the real victory could belong to Barisan Nasional and not Pakatan Rakyat.

Ong Kian Ming of UCSI University emphasised that the most significant of the verdict’s aftermath would be on how Najib would use it to his advantage.

“He will likely try to take credit for it by saying that it indicates the judiciary’s independence,” he predicted. “The general election could very well be in the early part of the year and it will be very important for Najib to maintain momentum by introducing various legislative reforms.”

Associate Professor in Political Science of the Singapore Management University, Bridget Welsh, called Najib a “key winner” in the sodomy verdict which she said gave him a personal opportunity for him to show a middle ground.

She however cautioned against a premature hailing of judicial independence although she acknowledged that the verdict was undoubtedly a good and welcome first step.

“But the judiciary will no longer be battered as far as this sodomy trial is concerned,” Welsh laughed. “I think most people’s surprise over the verdict stemmed from the perception that the trial revolved around political targetting. An acquittal shows that wisdom won out in the end.”

Damage control

Constitutional expert, Abdul Aziz Bari, pointed out that the verdict could also be viewed as “damage control” to save BN from slipping further.

“The court by law should have acquitted Anwar without calling for his defence,” he stated. This sentiment is shared by many political observers and civil society groups who told FMT that the prime injustice was the existence of the charge itself.

One of them is Deputy Asia Director of the Human Rights Watch, Phil Robertson, who pointed out that Anwar was acquitted on a charge that should never have been brought in the first place.

Robertson even went as far as to call for Malaysia’s government to revoke its “outdated” sodomy law.

“This law is used to slander political opponents and critics,” he said. “Whether or not Anwar engaged in consensual ‘sodomy’ is irrelevant.”

“It’s time to reject this law and end the farcical political theater that promotes discrimination based on sexual orientation and destroys people’s lives.”

The political observers have also deemed the verdict as a personal victory for Anwar and his family more than it is for the opposition.

In an immediate response this morning Ong tweeted, “@anwaribrahim’s acquittal means no more reason for him to go on nationwide tour. will take some political momentum away from PR.”

He later told FMT that the sympathy votes that would have inevitably followed a conviction were now nullified.

“I was expecting up to a 2% vote swing against BN as a result of a conviction,” Ong said. “So the cost of this victory is a loss of those votes. It’s also a sign that the government wants to move on to other things.”

No longer an issue

James Chin of Monash University agreed that it was a “clever move” as both Pakatan and Anwar wouldn’t be able to make it an issue in the next general election.

“I think the people who are most happy about the verdict is DAP because a prison sentence would mean a hiccup in Pakatan’s leadership,” he added. “And DAP has major problems working with (PKR deputy president) Azmin (Ali).”

And then there are those who are adamant that the verdict is nothing more than a political ploy. Parti Socialis Malaysia secretary-general, S Arutchelvan, said that the only way it could be interpreted is an election ploy.

“It is an interesting verdict,” he said. “It looks like the political administration feels like putting Anwar behind bars will have bigger consequences than releasing him as people don’t believe the case against him. If they didn’t acquit it would have a bigger consequence (on the Najib administration).”

Suaram coordinator, E Nalini, credited the people for being the driving force behind the judge’s decision. She too sided with Arutchelvan in suspecting the verdict of being a political ploy and blamed it the “bad trend” set by prior judicial proceedings.

Lawyers For Liberty (LFL) coordinator, Fadiah Nadwa Fikri added that if the government was really serious about reforms and achieving more democratic changes, then it should look into reforms in other areas like the police force and the Attorney-General’s Chambers.

“We have seen how selective the court has been in cases involving human rights,” she said. “The judicial is flawed as the system itself is questionable.”

Ex-Umno minister: I’m happy for Anwar

Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir lauds High Court decision to acquit the opposition leader.

KUALA LUMPUR: Former Information and Tourism Minister Abdul Kadir Sheikh Fadzir lauded the High Court decision today to acquit Anwar Ibrahim of a sodomy charge.

“I think it’s a great day for the Malaysian judiciary. So many things were said about our judiciary in the past and it was very very dangerous.

“People had no confidence in the judiciary, but today they (judiciary) have redeemed themselves,” the Amanah’s deputy president told reporters at the court steps.

Abdul Kadir, who spoke after Anwar exited the court, said the decision must be taken as a great opportunity to re-establish the independence of the judiciary.

Asked why he was here, he said simply “to hear the verdict”. On whether he was present in his capacity as an Umno member, he said he was representing Amanah.

“I’m happy for Anwar. I’m happy because I have followed this trial and what the judge did was the common sense thing to do.

“If the decision was otherwise, lawyers will shudder at our judiciary,” he said. “Citizens and investors must realise that rule of law will prevail.”

Asked if his statement amounted to an admission that Umno had interfered with the justice system, he said: “No comment”.

He nevertheless added: “It’s true that people were uncomfortable in the independence of our judiciary, there was a big question mark there.”

Meanwhile, DAP strategist Liew Chin Tong said the result may “swing both ways” – for BN or Pakatan.

“PM Najib Tun Razak may be thinking about elections. But it’s hard to say. It can go both ways. It may also help Najib ‘prove’ his reform agenda,” said Liew.

Liew also revealed that in the court of public opinion, surveys showed that 15% are aware of the corruption in Umno, but they are not ready for Pakatan.

“Polls show that 60% are aware of Umno’s corruption but only 45% said they’ll vote Pakatan. This verdict may well cancel each other’s benefit out,” he said.

Saiful redha dengan keputusan mahkamah

Dalam akaun Twitter miliknya, beliau berkata beliau akan terus tenang, berdoa dan sabar menerima keputusan yang dibuat.

KUALA LUMPUR: Pengadu dalam kes liwat membabitkan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan redha dengan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur hari ini yang mendapati Ketua Pembangkang itu tidak bersalah terhadap dakwaan tersebut.

Mohd Saiful, 26, dalam akaun Twitter miliknya, berkata beliau akan terus tenang, berdoa dan sabar menerima keputusan yang dibuat Hakim Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah.

“Tidak di dunia, namun di Masyhar PASTI. Redha dengan ketentuanNya. Akan terus tenang, doa, istiqamah dan sabar. Illahi Antal Maksudi Wa Ridhoka Mathlubi,” demikian entri akaun Twitternya.

Mohd Saiful tidak hadir semasa mahkamah membuat keputusan itu.

Semasa melepas dan membebaskan Anwar daripada pertuduhan itu, Mohamad Zabidin berkata tiada bukti yang menyokong keterangan

Mohd Saiful dan mahkamah tidak boleh bergantung semata-mata kepada keterangan tersebut bagi mensabitkan Anwar.

Sementara itu, Menteri Penerangan Komunikasi dan Kebudayaan Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim menyifatkan keputusan mahkamah itu menunjukkan badan kehakiman negara bebas dan mengeluarkan pendapat serta keputusan tanpa memilih bulu.

“Penghakiman sudah diputuskan…dengan itu sah badan kehakiman negara ini mempunyai reputasi dan pendirian yang boleh disetarafkan dengan keputusan kehakiman negara maju berasaskan kepada ‘rule of law’ atau keunggulan undang-undang,” katanya kepada pemberita, di sini hari ini.

Anwar, 64, dituduh meliwat Mohd Saiful yang juga bekas pembantunya di Kondominium Desa Damansara di Bukit Damansara di sini, antara pukul 3.10 petang dan 4.30 petang 26 Jun 2008.

- Bernama

CNN: Anwar Ibrahim On Acquittal

Press Release: Acquittal on charge of consensual sex between adults is in accord with evidence


ImageThe Malaysian Bar welcomes the decision of the High Court in acquitting Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim.  The principles of natural justice call for nothing less, in light of the grave concerns over whether the accused’s right to a fair trial was preserved.
 
Based on news reports of the trial, it is clear that the High Court decision is in accord with the evidence for, amongst others, the following reasons:

(1) The lack of full disclosure: Both prior to and during the trial itself, the legal team for the defence was denied access to certain documents and physical evidence in the possession of the prosecution, which disadvantaged the accused in the preparation of his defence.

(2) Unreliable DNA evidence: There were obvious concerns that the DNA sample submitted as evidence was unreliable or may have been compromised.

(3) Certain unusual findings during the trial proceedings: 

(a) The trial judge made an unprecedented finding at the end of the prosecution’s case that the complainant was a truthful and credible witness, without the benefit of having heard the defence.

(b) While the court allowed the Prime Minister and his wife to be interviewed by the defence legal team, the subpoena issued by the defence compelling the attendance of the Prime Minister and his wife was set aside by the High Court upon the application of the prosecution.  The absence of curiosity in this regard casts grave concerns on the credibility of the complaint in the first place. 

(4) The unrefuted relationship between the complainant and a member of the prosecution team, which raised serious questions whether the complainant had access to investigation papers, which would have enabled him to tailor his evidence at trial.

The charge against Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim, which is based on an archaic provision of the Penal Code that criminalises consensual sexual relations between adults, should never have been brought.  The case has unnecessarily taken up judicial time and public funds. 

The Malaysian Bar hopes that the Attorney General would not pursue any appeal, and will instead focus the valuable resources of the Attorney General’s Chambers on more serious crimes.
 
Lim Chee Wee
President
Malaysian Bar