Share |

Thursday, 27 September 2012

Race-based policies must end, says Anwar

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 26 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim pledged today that a Pakatan Rakyat (PR) government would put an end to race-based policies as he said the current preferential treatment for Bumiputeras had been abused to enrich cronies.

He also promised a “new phase of competitiveness and open tenders” to help Malaysia regain its edge, as part of PR’s alternative Budget 2013 proposals he unveiled in Parliament today.

“Race-based policies must end...we will continue to help the poor to get facilities like microcredit. Who benefits the most? The Malays. They have the most people, so even if you give help to an Indian person, it won’t affect the majority who are Malays,” he told reporters today.

PR’s Budget proposals, which include promises to raise disposable income by cutting car taxes, abolish road tolls and waive student loans, were announced today ahead of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s official announcement on Friday of the government’s plans for spending and taxes next year.

PR’s proposals will put pressure on BN as the country braces for what is expected to be its most keenly contested general election in the next few months.

Najib also is expected to announce equally populist policies on Friday as he seeks to lead his Barisan Nasional (BN) to a strong mandate and will need to aggressively court voters to his side.

Najib is expected to announce more cash handouts for the poor and introduce policies to help Malaysians afford homes.

Anwar (picture) said today that Bumiputera policies had been abused to enrich a minority of Malaysians, and appeared to take a swipe at his old nemesis Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

“Now the children of a former PM control billions of rights for petroleum. Bumiputera rights have to benefit larger numbers of people. Does this mean therefore ignoring poor marginalised communities? No. That’s why our proposals take into consideration the need for qualified Bumiputeras to compete. Malaysia cannot regain its competitiveness if we do not move to enhance its competitiveness,” he said.

Asked if PR would reduce government subsidies if they were to take over Putrajaya, Anwar said his coalition would first have to adopt more transparent policies to plug leaks that arise as a result of inefficiency and corruption.

“We will make the policies under the PR government more transparent to avoid leakages and waste through corruption,” he said.

“We also will make the process in procuring government contracts more transparent and have open tenders to end the monopoly by families of ministers.

“Then we will look at the possibility of reducing subsidies,” he added.

Anwar also said PR’s budget would present a more “realistic” picture of Malaysia’s economic situation next year, forecasting the size of the Malaysian economy at RM1,064 billion with an economic growth rate of 5.2 per cent, inflation rate of three per cent and a budget deficit ease of 3.5 per cent.

“BN has never fulfilled any of their economic forecast. They have never been honest about their figures,” he said, pointing out that Putrajaya had failed to register the targeted growth of six per cent for eight consecutive quarters from Q3 2010 onwards.

“PR will be honest about the figures and in turn, present a more realistic forecast on the direction of the economy,” he added.

PR’s Budget proposals, which include promises to raise disposable income by cutting car taxes, abolish road tolls and waive student loans, were announced today ahead of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s official announcement on Friday of the government’s plans for spending and taxes next year.

PR’s proposals will put pressure on BN as the country braces for what is expected to be its most keenly contested general election in the next few months.

Najib also is expected to announce equally populist policies on Friday as he seeks to lead his Barisan Nasional (BN) to a strong mandate and will need to aggressively court voters to his side.

The PM is expected to announce more cash handouts for the poor and introduce policies to help Malaysians afford homes.

Speaker blocks debate on AG Gani Patail

In a letter to Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai, Dewan Rakyat secretary Rosmee Hamzah said that oral questions posed at the House should not be based on hearsay and insults.

PETALING JAYA: Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai’s application to submit an oral question to debate on the allegations contained in the controversial book “Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail Pemalsu, Penipu, Penjenayah” was rejected by the Dewan Rakyat.

In a letter to Tan, Dewan Rakyat secretary Rosmee Hamzah said that any questions at Parliament should not be based on hearsay and insults.

“Standing Order 23 (1) C states that oral questions should not be based on prejudice, slander, praises, insults, confusing terms or any issue which is trivial,” said Rosmee.

A copy of the letter was also sent to Dewan Rakyat Speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia and Home Ministry secretary Abdul Rahim Mohamad Radzi.

In August, former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) advisory panel member Robert Phang challenged Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail to deny the allegations made in the book authored by Zainal Abidin Ahmad.

The book lists details on Gani’s alleged criminal acts ranging from abuse of power, corruption to other criminal acts.

“I challenge the MACC and the police to probe the allegations made against Gani by the author,” Phang was reported saying.

He also lodged a police report against Gani.

Gani has come under fire from various quarters over the years, with even former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim calling Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to establish a tribunal to investigate the alleged wrong-doings of the AG.

The former policeman alleged that Gani had tampered with evidence during the Sodomy I trial in 1998 involving former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim.

“I believe Zainal, by himself, is unable to prove Gani’s wrongdoings. But I can, and am able and ready to prove the allegations against Gani, in particular with regard to the falsification and fabrication in the investigation of the black-eye incident that is being debated until today,” Mat Zain reportedly said.

Pahang MB and Palanivel accused of lying


PSM disputes a statement about Cameron Highlands issues and seeks Najib’s intervention.
VIDEO INSIDE

PETALING JAYA: Pahang Menteri Besar Adnan Yaakob and MIC president G Palanivel have reneged on their promise to resolve security problems and land ownership issues faced by farmers and traders in Cameron Highlands, Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) alleged today.

It also accused the two of dishonesty when they put out a statement on July 17 claiming to have settled those problems, which are the source of complaints from farmers and traders in Green Cow, Kea Farm and Blue Valley.

The leader of PSM’s Cameron Highlands branch, B Suresh Kumar, made the allegations after he submitted a memorandum to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s office. He also requested an appointment with Najib.

“We want Najib to resolve the problems since Adnan and Palanivel have failed to keep their word,” he told reporters.

Green Cow used to be farming land spread out atop a hill. Property developers are currently carrying out earth-moving activities there, apparently endangering the lives and properties of farmers who live below the hill.

In Kea Farm, the state government is demolishing trading stalls to give way to a commercial project.

In Blue Valley, farmers are complaining that they have been denied land ownership despite having worked the land for nearly 50 years.

Cronyism

Suresh accused the state government of giving land to its cronies to the detriment of the farmers and traders.


“People allied to the state government and their cronies are given land titles even though applications to open new land have been stopped since 2002,” he said.

“The people have lost trust and confidence in Adnan’s leadership. He has not met the people of Cameron Highlands since 2010.”

He also said Adnan promised in May that he would meet the farmers and traders but had not done so.

As for Palanivel, Suresh said the MIC chief was trying to give the impression that he was doing something for the people of Cameron Highlands even though he was not.

He attributed this to Palanivel’s interest in seeking election to the Cameron Highlands parliament seat.

Suresh was among 20 activists who were charged under the Peaceful Assembly Act on July 11 over a protest a day earlier outside the Pahang Menteri Besar’s office.

Referring to that demonstration, which was to highlight the issues in Cameron Highlands, he said Palanivel met him and other organisers on July 5 to dissuade them.

“We asked him to follow us to get an answer from the Menteri Besar, but he said he was too busy,” he said. “And then on July 17, he and Adnan gave a joint statement that all the issues had been resolved.”
This story makes me...
Think (3) Happy (8) Angry (124) Sad (3) Want to Vote (11) Stand Up for My Rights (10)

RM414,000 spent on special envoys

The total amount does not include the envoys' salaries.

KUALA LUMPUR: A total of RM414,366.16 in expenses have been spent on Malaysia’s two special envoys to China (Ong Ka Ting) and India (S Samy Vellu) this year.

These details were revealed by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nazri Abdul Aziz in the Dewan Rakyat today, in response to a query by PKR-Batu MP Tian Chua over the matter.

Samy Vellu, who is serving as Malaysia’s special envoy with a ministerial rank on infrastructure to India and South Asia, apparently racked up a total overall expenditure of RM373,071 in 2012 so far.

At the same time, he was paid a monthly salary of RM27, 227.20. The former MIC president also had on staff a private secretary, special officer, two special drivers, an office secretary and a police escort.

Ong, on the other hand, appeared to rack up a smaller amount, with expenses totalling RM41,295.16 in 2012 so far.

The former MCA president was also paid a monthly salary of RM20,000, and had on staff a senior and non-senior private secretary.

Nazri said that Ong himself suggested for less facilities.

Samy Vellu was appointed to his post on Jan 1, 2011 and his stint will end on Dec 31, 2012. Ong started work on Nov 1, 2011 and his appointment will end on Oct 31, 2013.

Former ministers have the edge

Tian also asked about Ong and Samy Vellu’s role as special envoys, given that Malaysia already has ambassadors to these countries.

He then asked how the government could appoint these two envoys, alleging that they were supposedly involved in matters of bribery.

This query irked Nazri, who termed Tian’s allegation as slander, denying that the two had been involved in corruption of any kind.

He said that it would have been a big mistake not to use Malaysians of Chinese and Indian heritage to deal with these economic powerhouses.

He said Samy Vellu was appointed because of his experience as works minister, besides his infrastructure-related connections with India.

Ong, Nazri added, shared similar connections with China. However, he said that Ong had language advantages over Malaysia’s embassy staff in China.

“We have an embassy there, but they [staff] are not fluent in Mandarin. But our special envoy is fluent in Mandarin, and can ease our relationship with China,” he said.

Nazri added that the envoys’ former status as ministers also gave them an edge over normal businessmen.

He said that people in these two countries would prefer to meet with former ministers rather than with everyday folk.

New field for Senawang Tamil school, maybe

MIC expects good news soon from JKR.

SENAWANG: MIC has obtained a promise from the Public Works Department (JKR) that it would consider acquiring land on which to build a new sports field for the Senawang Tamil School.

The promise came yesterday from a senior JKR official in the wake of protests against a planned flyover project that will cut across the current quarter-acre school field, reducing its size by a half.

Negeri Sembilan MIC chief T Rajagopalu told FMT that the official, Nor Azman Ismail, assured him he would bring up the matter with his superiors.

Nor Azman is the senior general manager for construction in JKR’s Special Projects Unit. He had a meeting at the school yesterday with MIC delegates, officials from the Negeri Sembilan Education Department, the headmaster of the school and the president of the school’s PTA.

Rajagopalu said he proposed that JKR acquire 1.5 acres of plantation land adjacent to the school for the new field.

“He was receptive to the idea and promised to bring the proposal to his bosses in Kuala Lumpur,” he said.

He added that he was confident of receiving “the good news” soon.

The PTA president, T Balakrishnan, said he was happy with the proposal but would withhold his congratulations at least until the acquisition of the land was confirmed.

“Yes, the proposal is a good idea,” he said. “But this is just a proposal that hasn’t been confirmed. I have first to see the document first for the land acquisition. I also need to discuss this with my committee members. Let’s see what the outcome is.”

Earlier yesterday, Rajagopalu, together with MIC leaders from Rembau and Rasah, joined parents in a peaceful protest in front of the school against JKR’s takeover of the current field.

Stay away from M’sia, Zakir

The call is growing louder for the government to bar controversial Muslim preacher from coming here.

GEORGE TOWN: Hindraf Makkal Sakti and a local Gerakan leader have called on the government to bar controversial Muslim preacher Zakir Naik from Malaysia.

Former president of Malaysian chapter of Transparency International, Tunku Aziz Ibrahim, meanwhile cautioned Zakir not to “come here and insult Malaysians”.

Hindraf national coordinator W Sambulingam was uncompromising with the movement’s stand, saying that Zakir must be banned from the country.

He said Zakir was known for pouring scorns on other faiths, pointing out that the controversial orator was banned in Canada and United Kingdom.

He said Zakir would be a menace to the country’s multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-culture and multi-language landscape.

“He is a national threat against peace and harmony that we all cherish. He must be barred and banned altogether.

“He is the last person that Malaysia wants,” Sambulingam told FMT here today.

Gerakan’s Baljit Singh concurred with Sambulingam, saying that Malaysia had no place for religious fanatics like Zakir.

He said the government should be sensitive to all religious sentiments as Zakir would likely insult other religions in his speeches.

“His reputation precedes him,” said Baljit, who heads Penang Gerakan’s legal and human rights bureau.

He noted that all Malaysians had demonstrated a united stand in condemning the controversial US-made movie “Innocence of Muslims”.

Similarly, he called on all Malaysians to also speak out with one voice to compel the government to stop Zakir coming here.

Zakir of Mumbai, India, is expected to address several forums across the country, including in PWTC, until Oct 7.

“Malaysians should demonstrate their consistent stand against religious extremism. It’s time for all Malaysians to oppose Zakir and stop him from coming here,” said Baljit.

“The government should not issue a visa to Zakir. The government should be sensitive to all religions,” he added.

Constitutional duty

Tunku Aziz said that the government probably cannot bar Zakir.

But, he said the government has a constitutional duty to caution Zakir and the Malaysian host for his trip, Saba Islamic Media, “on the impact of what he says on the country’s multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-cultural set-up.”

“No Malaysian would want a foreigner to come here and insult Malaysians,” he said.

Citing the Muslims’ latest outrage against the video “Innocence of Muslims”, he urged Muslims to be consistent in their stand to oppose all forms of religious extremism that would incite violence and hatred among Malaysians.

He reminded Muslims that Islam is a religion of peace strictly forbidding violence, hatred or insults on others.

“The Federal Constitution upholds freedom of religion for all Malaysians. All Malaysians are duty- bound to uphold the freedom.

“Hence, Muslims should safeguard the interests, rights and sensitivity of non-Muslims,” Tunku Aziz said.

Zakir’s imminent arrival has sparked a storm in cyber space, especially in social network Facebook.

Many complained that Zakir frequently insults Hinduism, the latest during last week’s Vinaayagar Chathurti, a Hindu festival marking the birth of Lord Ganesha (elephant-faced deity).

Malaysia's Budget and the Election

Najib says things will be better
Najib says things will be better
Prime Minister Najib seeks to deliver the goodies to his core constituencies
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is expected to table a national budget Friday that will be bulging with takeaways for prospective voters in an election that keeps receding into the future.

It is likely to include relief for first-time homebuyers and some aid for senior citizens, as well as yet more benefits for civil servants, the great preponderance of whom are Malays, Najib’s core constituency, as well as some additional assistance for people in the kampungs, or rural Malay villages. It has been estimated that there are almost no Malay families without a family member either in the civil service or the military.

The election now appears likely to be pushed back to sometime after the Lunar New Year, which begins on Feb. 10. November is unlikely, analysts say, because roughly 30,000 prospective Malay voters will be in Mecca on the hajj. Najib also has said he won’t call elections because the opposition Pakatan Rakyat coalition has announced that it will not call its own in the states it controls.

That apparently is because Selangor, the state surrounding the city of Kuala Lumpur, thought to be one of the opposition’s major strongholds, could be in play. The Bersih election reform NGO complains it’s because the Barisan Nasional, or ruling national coalition, has registered tens of thousands of suspicious new voters, some with scores living at the same address. The Barisan says it’s because Parti Keadilan Rakyat, which opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim heads, is badly organized and hasn’t been able to efficiently run the state government it won in 2008.

There may be truth in both claims. But in any case it probably means at least another five months of fevered politicking in a country increasingly exhausted, racially divided and tired of ceaseless maneuvering between the two forces.

The electioneering is taking place in a polarized and difficult political setting that law enforcement officials should be attempting to control and either can’t or don’t. There are growing instances of both opposition and Barisan Nasional partisans burning and stamping and urinating on the pictures of their opponents, in the Barisan’s case pictures of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim and his partners from Parti Islam se-Malaysia, or PAS, Nik Aziz Nik Mat and Hadi Awang, and Lim Kit Siang and Lim Guan Eng from the Democratic Action Party.

The respected Economist Corporate Network, the UK-based magazine’s global briefing service for business executives, in August predicted that the Barisan would be returned to power although its majority would be reduced again. In 2008, when the Barisan was returned to power with a dramatically diminished majority, it spelled the end of Abdullah Badawi’s political career.

Would a similar result spell the end of Najib’s political career as well? There has been long-standing speculation that Muhyiddin Yassin, appointed deputy prime minister when Najib took over in 2009, has long coveted the job, and any weakness on Najib’s part would let slip the dogs of internal politics. Last month, unknown people widely distributed posters in Johor and Penang states asking for Najib to step down and make way for Muhyiddin to be prime minister even before the elections are called. No one has taken responsibility for the posters.

According to a poll taken between Sept. 1-16 poll by the University of Malaya Centre for the Study of Democracy and Politics, Najib’s popularity has fallen from 61 percent to a still-respectable 58 percent since April while that of the Barisan Nasional has fallen from 40 percent to 32 percent during the same period, although the opposition approval figures are far below either of them.

UMNO continues to be hobbled by a long series of scandals and corruption eruptions. The government has sought to limit the damage not by going after those exposed by various entities as corrupt, but instead by seeking to neutralize and discredit the whistle-blowers. The Companies Commission has brought charges of money laundering against Suaram, the human rights NGO that has been the motive force behind the French investigation of bribery in the 2002 purchase of two submarines and the lease of a third. Cynthia Gabriel, the director of Suaram, was called in for questioning today on the charges.

The leaders of Bersih, the NGO that is demanding election reform, have been sued for RM117,000 for damage to a police car which was overturned in the aftermath of a reform rally in April. The government said the organizers of the rally didn’t adequately protect the police car—an interesting construct, since usually the police are there to protect the crowd.

The most recent to feel the government’s hot breath are Rafizi Ramli, the strategy chief for the opposition Parti Keadilan Rakyat, and Johan Mohamad, a former Public Bank clerk, for leaking explosive details of an equally embarrassing scandal involving Malaysia’s National Feedlot Corporation, controlled by the husband of Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, the head of the women’s wing of UMNO. The scandal became known as Cowgate, in which more than RM100 million from a government soft loan were allegedly squandered on personal trips, fancy cars, condominiums in Singapore and Kuala Lumpur and largely failed in its mission to establish an operation to slaughter tens of thousands of cattle annually following Islamic religious practices.

Chinese voters abandoned
The Barisan seems to have largely abandoned the Chinese vote. Political infighting and scandal have reduced the Malaysian Chinese Association to a shambles. Despite the fact that it remains in the Barisan, the MCA has lost most of its clout. As a result, the Barisan has largely written off the major cities where Chinese votes are concentrated, to concentrate on the kampungs in the belief that since ethnic Malays make up 60.3 percent of the population, they will deliver a national majority for the coalition. In 2008, about 45 per cent of Malays voted for opposition parties. The Chinese percentage of the population has shrunk to 22.9 percent from 45 percent in 1957, partly because of Chinese migration to Singapore, Australia and other countries, and partly because ethnic Malay fertility rates are 40 percent higher than those of ethnic Indians and 56 percent higher than Malay Chinese, whose total fertility rate at 1.8 live births per adult woman, has fallen below replacement.

That has put racial politics at the front and center of the campaign and made for periodic bouts of ugly rhetoric, particularly from the Malay supremacy NGO Perkasa, and its leader, Ibrahim Ali, who has made flame-throwing speeches that come close to inciting violence. The still influential former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad is the patron of Perkasa and has backed their inflammatory rhetoric publicly and in his blog.

UMNO has also sought to exploit the presence of Parti Islam se-Malaysia in the opposition coalition over a long-standing provision in the conservative Islamic party’s platform to institute hudud, or Shariah law, which includes harsh punishment for certain crimes, including theft, adultery, alcohol consumption, fornication and apostasy. The allegations that PAS would institute hudud are designed to impel urban ethnic Malays, who tend to be more liberal, from voting for PAS. The party’s newly elected moderate leaders deny they have any intention of doing any such thing.

The racial and electoral tensions have had a negative effect on investment, with foreign direct investment, a crucial Najib goal, actually falling on an annual basis. Net FDI is forecast to be down 5.8 percent in US dollar terms in 2012. As a percentage of gross domestic product, net FDI is expected to be off by 1.9 percent for 2012.

There have been reports that top Chinese businessmen have delayed investments until after the election because of concerns about the political climate. That situation continues despite protestations of confidence from the prime minister and UMNO cadres. One particularly alarmist contact – an ethnic Malay businessman – said he and sizeable numbers of others, particularly Chinese ones, intend to book flights out of Kuala Lumpur after voting on the day the election is called because they fear a breakdown in law and order should it appear that the opposition is close to gaining an edge in the 222-member lower house of Parliament

If there were actually to be a hung parliament, chaos could be expected in the Dewan Rakyat, or parliament. Intensive horse-trading would take place in which both sides would resort to pouring money to safeguard or secure the loyalty of the minority parties and lure members away from the other party. In particular, the Barisan-affiliated parties in Sabah and Sarawak are especially thought to be open to swapping sides. The chief ministers of both states have been implicated in massive – a word that is often overused, but in this case may be inadequate – corruption.

In particular, Abdul Taib Mahmud, the long-serving chief minister of Sarawak, has been implicated in looting the state of billions of dollars from resource extraction and salting the money away in Swiss banks as well as Australian, British, Canadian and US real estate. In Sabah, records show that the chief minister Musa Aman, steered more than US$90 million from timber sales into a Zurich, Switzerland account. If Anwar is close to tipping the balance in the Pakatan Rakyat’s favour, he will attempt to entice the two to change sides, partly through guarantees of immunity from prosecution – there goes his record as a reformer – and through an increased portion of the oil and other revenues on East Malaysia resources that are now collected by the federal government. The two states get 5 percent of the royalty but have lately been clamouring for up to 20 percent.

Parti Keadilan remains riven with factions largely stemming from the frustrated opportunists who left UMNO in 2008 and 2009 to join Anwar for a new avenue to power. Anwar continues to be constantly harried by lawsuits and attacks. But at the same time he appears to be manoeuvring deftly to keep the coalition ready for a projected election.

A lot of money has been lost betting against UMNO. In the 1980s, the party was split among factions backing Musa Hitam, Tunku Razaleigh Hamzah and Mahathir. Going into the 1986 general elections, the party then as now was saddled by major controversy including the Bank Bumi scandal, in which the state-owned bank was forced to recapitalise after having lost US$1 billion through its Hong Kong-based subsidiary, Bumiputra Malaysia Finance. Mahathir himself had been exposed as the architect of a disastrous attempt to corner the tin market, which lost another US$500 million. The Cooperative Central Bank, established to help smallholders, was exposed as nearly insolvent because of nonperforming loans made to 19 UMNO politicians which had not been serviced in years.

Nonetheless, when the dust settled in the wake of the election, the Barisan Nasional had won a clear and convincing victory and Mahathir was still in charge. UMNO in particular traditionally has had the nuts-and-bolts ability to use government services to get its voters to the polls. There are continuing – and credible – allegations that the Barisan has been registering large numbers of illegal aliens from Indonesia to pad the Malay vote. The party has also always been able to use its coffers to pay for the sandwiches, the buses, the polycarbonate for poverty-stricken voters’ roofs, the little bribes to its rural Malay constituents. There It retains that capability and it will use them.

That doesn’t put Pakatan Rakyat out of the picture. Sources in the business community say that businessmen, either sensing an opportunity or covering their bets, are opening their wallets to the opposition, giving them for the first time the ability to play the same kind of Moneyball. The opposition won in five of Malaysia’s 13 states in 2008 and with the power of incumbency and ability to dish out projects and contracts, businessmen doing commerce in these states are more willing to open their wallets for the opposition parties this time around.

On balance, it is inevitable to escape the conclusion that political instability will continue – until the election if the Barisan wins handily, and well afterward if it’s close as the jockeying for power continues on both sides. Over the next few months, politics as it is practiced in Kuala Lumpur will not be for the faint-hearted.

Permintaan untuk Campur Tangan dalam menghalang Penceramah Zakir Naik dari memberi ceramah di Malaysia bemula 28hb Sept 2012

Persatuan RAPAT Malaysia
No. 260-2, 2nd Floor, Batu 2 ½, Jalan Ipoh, Sentul, 51200 Kuala Lumpur
Tel: +603-40411652 , Fax: +603-40411652

Y.A.B. Dato’ Sri Najib Tun Abdul Razak
Perdana Menteri Malaysia
Blok Utama, Bangunan Perdana Putra
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan
62502 PUTRAJAYA
E-Mail : ppm@pmo.gov.my 26 Sept 2012

Y.A.B,
PE : Permintaan untuk Campur Tangan dalam menghalang Penceramah Zakir Naik dari memberi ceramah di Malaysia bemula 28hb Sept 2012

Dengan segala hormatnya selebih dahulu kami mewakili masyarakat India melalui Persatuan RAPAT Malaysia bersama dengan lebih dari 50 buah NGO dari pelbagai kaum dengan ingin menarik perhatian pihak Y.A.B dan kerajaan khususnya dalam bercampur tangan dan menghalang Penceramah En Zakir Naik dari memberi sebarang ceramah di bumi aman Malaysia ini.

2. Untuk pengetahuan pihak YAB, Encik Zakir Naik ini merupakan seorang penceramah yang kontroversial dan banyak menghina ajaran agama lain seperti Kristian dan Hindu. Beliau pernah dihalang masuk ke Britian dan Canada kerana ceramah beliau yang berbau hasutan. Negara kita yang terdiri dari pelbagai kaum tidak memerlukan seorang yang tidak menghormati agama lain.

Rumah Gopinath diserang
3. Banyak laporan polis telah dibuat oleh individu dan organisasi sepanjang 2 hari ini dan dijangka lebih ramai yang akan berbuat demikian. Semalam sahaja lebih kurang 50 laporan dibuat di IPD Klang dan antaranya, report ialah KLANG030754-12 dan banyak lagi. Malangnya sehingga kini tiada sebarang kenyataan atau tindakan terhadap laporan-laporan polis kami. Berlainan pula dalam kes Sdr Gopinath Jayaratnam yang mana beliau telah diserang oleh sekumpulan pemuda petang semalam dan kini ditahan oleh PDRM dalam tempoh 24 jam laporan dibuat terhadapnya kerana disyaki menulis paparan di laman sosialnya yang menghina Nabi S.A.W.

4. Kami berharap pihak polis dan kerajaan akan bersikap adil serta saksama dalam tindakan untuk memastikan keamanan Negara terjalin. Saya juga sertakan beberapa links Youtube di mana ianya membuktikan penghinaannya terhadap agama lain terutama Hindu dan Kristain. Ianya terlalu sensitif di Malaysia dan pencegahan adalah mujarab dari pengubatan.


5. Sebagai anak Malaysia kami bersama-sama dengan rakan Islam baru-baru dalam menentang penerbitan filem “ Innonce of Islam” yang menghinakan dan mempesongkan kebenaran Islam. Akan tetapi berlainan pula layanan agensi kerajaan kepada seorang yang menghina umat lain. Beliau di alukan pula dengan permaidani !!. Saya juga sertakan sebahagian ucapan dan bukti penghinaan oleh Zakir Naik terhadap agama lain.
a. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-0G-PQZLRw - menghina Lord Ganesha
b. "Indian preacher Zakir Naik is banned from UK". BBC News. 18 June 2010.
c. Carlson, Kathryn Blaze. "Controversial Muslim televangelist Zakir Naik banned from Toronto conference".

6. Kami berharap yang kerajaan dan pihak Y.A.B akan meneliti permintaan ini dengan kadar segera dan serius dengan pandangan yang segera dan membuat persiapan untuk membatalkan lawatan Zakir Husinke Malaysia. Kami mengucap terima kasih kepada pihak YAB dan kepimpinan kerajaan secara amnya dalam mendengar rintihan masyarakat India dan mengubahnya segera.

Sekian. Terima kasih.


KANNAN RAMASAMY
Pengerusi
Persatuan RAPAT Malaysia
( Tel 012 269 0024)

s.k Y.B Datuk Seri Muyiddin Yassin, TPM Malaysia merangkap Menteri Pelajaran Malaysia
Y.B Dato G.Palanivel, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri merangkap Presiden MIC
Y.B. Koh Tsu Khoon, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri merangkap Presiden Gerakan
Y.B Datuk Ir.Dr. Wee Ka Siong, MCA
Y.B Dr. Mohd Puad Zarkashi, Timbalan Menteri Pelajaran II
Jabatan Agama Islam Negeri Selangor
Jabatan Islam Negeri Johor




Kepercayaan Umno adalah segala-galanya adalah pemikiran usang — Aspan Alias

26 SEPT — Kenyataan Dr Mahathir terhadap apa yang beliau katakan sebagai ‘Melayu tidak berterima kasih’ dan ‘tidak bersyukur’ memberikan reaksi yang sangat besar terhadap kewibawaan BN dalam menghadapi PRU yang akan datang. Bagi Mahathir Melayu yang tidak menyokong Umno itu adalah Melayu yang tidak bersyukur dan Melayu yang tidak berterima kasih.

Kenyataan Dr Mahathir itu telah memisahkan ramai Melayu diantara dua pihak yang bertentangan dengan lebih dalam lagi dan kata-kata Dr Mahathir itu sangat menyentuh ramai Melayu yang sedang dalam pencarian sekarang ini. Mengatakan Melayu tidak bersyukur dan tidak berterima kasih itu adalah kenyataan yang tidak bertanggungjawab kerana adalah tidak wajar untuk menuduh Melayu yang betul-betul Melayu itu tidak bersyukur. Hanya orang Melayu yang benar-benar Melayu sahaja yang tahu isi hati orang Melayu sendiri.

Jika benar Umno telah berjuang dan berusaha untuk menyatukan orang Melayu tidak akan berlaku perpecahan seperti yang kita alami sekarang ini. Enam puluh enam tahun mengaku sebagai parti yang menyatukan orang Melayu tetapi apa yang kita sekarang ini hanya menunjukkan kegagalan Umno untuk melakukannya. Bagi Mahathir dan pemimpin Umno yang lain bersatunya Melayu itu ada beberapa cara:

Pertamanya Melayu mesti menyokong Umno bulat-bulat dan jangan mengambil kira samada Umno itu jujur atau tidak. Mereka menganggap Melayu mesti dipenjara dan diberi makan sikit-sikit untuk mengelak orang Melayu dari berfikir dan bertindak mengikut kehendak zaman dan waktunya. Kalau pemimpin rasuah di tabur benih-benih nilai yang membunuh orang Melayu sendiri seperti ada setengah Melayu yang berkata, “kalau Melayu rasuah itu Melayu, orang Melayu juga yang kaya. Apa yang hendak di cemburukan?”

Apa sahaja yang pemimpin mereka buat jangan dipersoalkan. Yang Melayu mesti lakukan ialah menyokong sahaja dan jangan berbuat apa-apa. Terima sahaja bantuan rakyat 1 Malaysia (BRIM) dan bersyukurlah sampai mati. Terima sahaja bantuan dua batang gigi palsu dan terus mengundi Umno sampai mati. Itu adalah sifat berterima kasih. Kalau tidak menyokong Umno pulangkan balik gigi palsu itu kepada kerajaan.

Pemandu teksi diberikan empat tayar percuma dan dengan empat tayar percuma itu Umno mesti disokong tanpa berbelah bagi. Apa yang pemimpin buat di atas jangan dipersoalkan kerana mereka dah dapat empat biji tayar. Banyak lagi pemberian kerajaan yang kecil-kecil ini diperguna untuk menambat jiwa dan hati orang Melayu dan di harap terus menyokong parti itu. Kalau tidak menyokong kononnya orang Melayu akan hilang di dunia ini, tetapi mereka tidak sedar perlakuan pimpinan kita akan membuatkan orang Melayu hilang dunianya.

Cara keduanya ialah dengan membina perasaan benci terhadap bangsa bukan Melayu untuk dijadikan sebagai fakta yang boleh menyatukan orang Melayu. Pakatan Rakyat jika memerintah akan menghilangkan kuasa Melayu dalam politik dan merendahkan martabat agama Islam. Isu ini dimainkan dengan begitu hebat di kampung-kampung dan desa-desa bagi menakutkan orang Melayu untuk memberikan sokongan kepada parti-parti selain dari Umno.

Umno itu adalah segala-galanya kepada orang Melayu. Tidak ada Umno tidak akan selamat orang Melayu itu dunia akhirat. Itulah yang Umno cuba tanamkan dipemikiran orang Melayu. Itulah yang telah diyakini oleh orang Melayu sebegitu lama. Tetapi kepercayaan itu tidak lagi kekal dalam pemikiran orang Melayu kerana Umno sendiri telah menunjukkan yang itu hanyalah satu mitos yang usang.

Janji Umno untuk membina masyarakat bersatu padu sebagai matlamat yang ‘ultimate’ telah gagal samasekali malahan Umno pula yang menyuntik perasaan curiga- mencurigai diantara kaum dan agama. Memperbaiki kedudukkan ekonomi orang Melayu juga merupakan satu yang dijanjikan oleh Umno kepada rakyat tetapi orang Melayu tetap berada ditahap yang lama setelah Umno melalaikan dasar-dasar yang telah terbentuk sebelum Mahathir mengambilalih kepimpinan. Hanya segelintir orang Melayu yang mendapat segala-galanya dan tidak payah kita ulangi acapkali.

Umno tidak lagi mempunyai ‘attribute’ sebagai parti yang memerintah dengan sikapnya yang sama seperti parti-parti yang memulakan kejatuhan seperti yang kita lihat dimerata-rata negara didunia ini. Umno menampakkan sangat rasa ‘desperado’nya untuk kekal berkuasa dan itu tidak lagi ada sifat seperti parti pemerintah yang ‘magnanimous’ yang berlaku adil kepada semua rakyat jelata.

Umno gagal untuk memperbaiki diri mereka. Mereka tidak tahu ‘priority’ dalam penyelesaian kemelut politik hari ini. Mereka gagal untuk mengakui bahawa yang paling utama untuk di selesaikan ialah imej dan stigma rasuah yang telah melekat begitu ketara kepada Umno. Rakyat yang berfikir tahu jika rasuah tidak dapat dihapuskan tidak ada penyelesaian terhadap masalah mereka. Kita tahu jika kerajaan itu kerajaan rasuah tidak akan ada dan terjumpa lagi mereka (kerajaan) membuat keputusan dengan betul. Rasuah itu adalah pembunuh kepada tamaddun manusia dan jika rasuah berluas-luasa, percayalah negara tidak akan menjadi betul lagi sampai bila-bila.

Dengan keadaan ini ‘mindset’ rakyat sudah berubah dan ianya telah memadamkan segala kerja baik yang terdahulu kerana politik ini berkisar kepada keadan terkini dan masa depan negara.

Jika ‘mindset’ Melayu sudah berubah maka perubahan sebanyak 5 peratus sudah mencukupi untuk mengalih dan menganjakkan siapa yang akan memerintah negara selepas ini. Orang Melayu bukannya sesuka hati untuk menganjak dan mengalih atau mematahkan BN ini. Mereka bukan mematahkan semata-mata untuk mematahkan. Ianya bersebab dan penyebab ini telah wujud sejak hampir tiga puluh tahun dahulu.

Pilihanraya kali ini merupakan pilihanraya yang amat kritikal dan ia akan menentukan samada negara akan masih ditadbir oleh mereka yang tidak boleh dipercayai atau oleh mereka yang akan melakukan perubahan dalam segala-galanya semata-mata untuk menentukan Malaysia kekal sebagai negara yang mempunyai ‘consequence’ di mata masyarakat antarabangsa. Kaum bukan Melayu sudah menentukan sikap mereka. Jika ada perubahan sebanyak 5 peratus dikalangan orang Melayu maka Umno wajar menerima kenyataan yang sekarang adalah giliran mereka untuk duduk di kerusi pembangkang.

Inilah yang membuatkan Dr Mahathir bercakap tidak berhenti-henti untuk menyelamatkan kuasa yang berada di tangan BN pada masa ini. Segala kritikan beliau terhadap orang Melayu sekarang ini adalah kritikan kepada dirinya sendiri. Kekuatan yang bertambah yang dibentuk oleh pihak pembangkang sekarang telah diperkuatkan lagi oleh Mahathir sendiri.

Kata-kata Dr Mahathir kini merupakan kata-kata yang ‘counter productive’ bagi Umno dan BN. Lagi banyak Dr Mahathir bercakap lebih mudah lagilah Pakatan Rakyat untuk meneruskan perjalanan ke Putrajaya itu. Orang Melayu mempunyai ‘alternative’ yang banyak, di antaranya PAS akan menjadi pilihan kepada perjuangan orang Melayu bersama dengan Islamnya dan DAP pula telah mengakui yang mereka (DAP) bahawa orang Melayu merupakan tonggak kepada politik dan siasah orang Melayu.

Tiada parti yang selamat tanpa sokongan orang Melayu dan itulah juga sebabnya Umno merasa tidak selamat kerana kehilangan sokongan Melayu yang agak mendadak sekarang ini.

Sesungguhnya Umno sedang menghadapi masalah yang tidak dapat digambarkan besarnya dengan kata-kata. Umno bermasalah dan akan terus bermasalah… Jika sesebuah parti menghadapi masalah yang besar ia akan meruntuhkan lagi keyakinan rakyat yang akan mengundi. — aspanaliasnet.blogspot.com

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Bar Still An Important Partner In Rule Of Law, Says Najib

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 26 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said the Malaysian Bar remained an important partner in the rule of law and administration of justice in the country although the government did not always agree with some of its views and activities.

The Prime Minister said despite the occasional belligerence, both in politics and the legal profession, the government still listened to what the body had to say and took a keen interest in what they did.

"We may make the occasional joke about lawyers, but nonetheless they have a unique and important role to play in our country," said Najib at the International Malaysia Law Conference 2012, here today.

However Najib said he was fully aware that some in the law fraternity, especially those in the area of human rights, chose to see "the glass as half empty rather than half full", notwithstanding the government's gradual introduction of progressive legislation over the past year.

"To them I have this to say: Walls are more easily crumbled than foundations raised. Just as Rome was not built in a day, the building of a just, equitable and democratic Malaysia cannot be achieved overnight," he said.

Najib said that law reforms such as the decision to rescind three Emergency Proclamations leading to the expiry of Emergency Ordinances showed that the government had delivered on its promises to the people.

He noted that the government had also decided to repeal the Internal Security Act 1971, Banishment Act 1959 and Restricted Residence Act 1933 as well as to amend the Printing Presses and Publication Act 1984 for better rights to freedom of speech and expression.

To uphold every citizen's right to freedom of assembly, section 27 of the Police Act was abolished and the Peaceful Assembly Act 2011 was introduced, while the government simultaneously expressed its intention to repeal the Sedition Act of 1948, he added.

"We've already embarked on several steps but the journey is long and will continue. These are a few examples to corroborate when we say 'We walk the talk'.

"Judge me not by what I say but by what I do," he said promising that the reforms would be irreversible.

Referring to the launch of the National Legal Aid Foundation (YBGK) in February last year, Najib said it was another milestone towards ensuring that access to justice was made available to individuals who were arrested.

YBGK provides free legal aid and advice to all Malaysians (irrespective of their financial means) at the police station during questioning, remand hearing and when they are charged in court.

According to Najib, it is estimated that 539 people were arrested every day by the police in Peninsular Malaysia alone.

Najib said although the right to legal advice and representation was included in Section 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code, the establishment of YBGK was a firm expression of the government's commitment to breathe life into Article 5(3) of the Federal Constitution, which states that those under arrest should be allowed to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice.

"The positive result of this initiative is apparent. Between April and July 2012 alone, YBGK lawyers have assisted 16,274 persons from remand up to hearing," he said.

Najib also quoted his late father Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, who opened the inaugural Malaysian Law Conference in 1971, where as the country's second prime minister he emphasised the importance of mutual cooperation between the Bar and the administration to better serve the people.

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

NST given 48 hours to apologise to NGOs



Father demands cattle and land from daughter's rapist

İSTANBUL, The father of a girl raped by a teen relative in the eastern province of Erzurum has demanded land, cattle and that the rapist marry his daughter and the rapist's sister marry his son, according to a report by the Sabah daily on Monday.

The incident took place in the Tuzlataşı village of Erzurum's Çat district. The 13-year-old victim, E.D., was in the family stables taking care of a horse when she was attacked and raped by 15-year-old Fatih D. Children playing nearby alerted the victim's family, who found her unconscious in the stables.

The young girl told her family of the rape after she regained conscious and her family pummeled the rapist's home with stones, saying, “Give the rapist to us or else we will burn down your home.”

People in the village held a town hall meeting in order to try and find a resolution, and maintain peace between the two families. The father of the victim, Nizamettin D., who was in attendance at the meeting, said the only way he could forgive what happened was if Fatih D.'s family gave his family six cattle and a parcel of land; he also insisted that Fatih D. marry his daughter, and the rapist's sister marry his son.

Fatih D.'s father, Şükrü D., gave E.D.'s family the six cattle and land they requested, but then fled from the village fearing that he might be killed by members of the victim's family.

Locals informed the gendarmerie about the incident, which led to Fatih D.'s arrest. In his interrogation, Fatih D. confessed that he had raped E.D. and wanted to abduct her. “I told E.D. that I wanted to run away with her. When she refused to come with me, I pulled her and dragged her on the floor of the barn, but then I left her there and fled to the mountains. I was with the shepherds,” he said. Fatih D. was taken into custody following his interrogation.

Meanwhile, E.D. was taken to a hospital and kept there for observation. She later stated in court that she had been raped by Fatih D.

398 unescorted Nigerian women held in Saudi Arabia

Sokoto: Nigerian officials say 398 Muslim women pilgrims travelling to Makkah were temporarily held at a Saudi Arabian airport for travelling without male relatives.

A spokesman for Nigeria's National Hajj Commission said Saudi authorities held the Nigerian women between Thursday and Monday at King Abdulaziz Airport in Jeddah.

Spokesman Uba Mana said the women were allowed to proceed with their pilgrimage Monday following diplomatic intervention.

He said Saudi authorities held them for not travelling with a male relative due to a "communication gap".

He said an agreement between the countries exempts Nigerian women from requiring a male relative to escort them during the Hajj pilgrimage, which costs about $4,000 per person.

All able-bodied Muslims who can afford it are expected to perform Hajj at least once in their lives.

US multinational fined RM80m for bribery in Malaysia and other countries

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 25 — US multinational Tyco has agreed to pay US$26 million (RM80 million) to settle charges by the US government that it engaged in corrupt practices in more than a dozen countries in Asia and the Middle East, including Malaysia.

According to documents from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Tyco is alleged to have bribed officials, including an employee of a Malaysian government-controlled entity, in order to win lucrative contracts.

The SEC said in a media statement yesterday that the global manufacturer allegedly perpetuated schemes that typically involved payments of fake “commissions” or the use of third-party agents to funnel money improperly to obtain the contracts.

It also said that Tyco, whose place of incorporation was shifted to Switzerland in 2008, agreed to pay more than US$26 million to settle the SEC’s charges.

Other countries that Tyco was alleged to have engaged in bribery include China, India, Thailand, Croatia, Serbia, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, the UAE, Mauritania, Congo, Niger, Madagascar, Turkey, Poland and Egypt.

The SEC’s charges against Tyco claim that the latter made payments to approximately 26 employees of customers in Malaysia, including an employee of a government-controlled entity.

It also claimed that Tyco’s Malaysian subsidiary inaccurately described these expenses as “commissions” and failed to maintain policies sufficient to prohibit such payments, resulting in Tyco’ s books and records being misstated.

Tyco is a leading provider of electronic security products and services, fire protection and detection products and services, and valves and controls.

A Tyco spokesman was quoted by UK’s Financial Times yesterday as saying: “We’re committed to maintaining our rigorous compliance programmes across all of our business activities.”

Malaysia, which is attempting to stamp out corruption, has made international news over several other cases related to graft by multinationals in the country including one involving Australian banknote company Securency and French telecommunications giant Alcatel.

The headlines could reinforce perception that Malaysia has a reputation where bribes are paid to public officials.

Corruption was identified by the World Economic Forum this year as one of the top five problems facing businesses in Malaysia.

Malaysia also slipped four spots to 60th in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index last year.

The Najib administration has made corruption one of the National Key Result Areas of its Government Transformation Programme to reform the government and make it more efficient and transparent.

Alcatel admitted in 2010 that it had bribed Malaysian government officials some time between 2004 and 2006 to win a US$85 million contract.

Earlier this month, it was reported that Australian central bank officials were told in 2007 that Securency had engineered a scheme to hide a RM492,000 payment to a Malaysian arms dealer in order to secure contracts from the Abdullah administration despite an earlier denial.

The arms dealer — Abdul Kayum Syed Ahmad — was charged here last year with two counts of giving RM50,000 bribes in 2004 and 2005 to former Bank Negara assistant governor Datuk Mohamad Daud Dol Moin in order to procure a contract to print the RM5 polymer bank notes by Reserve Bank subsidiary Note Printing Australia Ltd.

Abdul Kayum has pleaded not guilty.

Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has also denied allegations that the Australian banknote firms attempted to bribe him for a RM100 million Malaysian currency contract during his tenure as prime minister.

School field sacrificed for flyover project

SJK(T) Senawang's field will be taken up for the Seremban-Tampin road project and parents are none too pleased.

SENAWANG: A group of parents and several Pakatan Rakyat state assemblymen staged a protest in front of Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil (SJKT) Senawang yesterday against a planned flyover project that will cut cross the school field.

P Gunasekaran, DAP’s Senawang state assemblyman, who was representing the parents, said: “The field is already small, about 8,000 sq ft, smaller than a standard field in schools.

“The Public Works Department plans to build a flyover here and 50% of the field will be taken up for the project on the Seremban-Tampin federal road. This project was approved in 2009.

“The building of flyover close to the 125-year-old school will result in noise pollution and will disrupt lessons. The government should relocate the school, with a proper field for the students.

“There is ample land (oil palm) adjacent to the school. The state government can acquire the land, relocate the school and provide a new and bigger school field,” said Gunasekaran.

Gunasekaran said the root cause of the problem was poor planning by the authorities.

“The government should not have built a KTM commuter station here in the first place as it is on a narrow location and too close to the school – just by the side of the Seremban federal road.

“If the station was built in a much more spacious land or location, the need to build a flyover will definitely not arise,” he said.

“The commuter station and flyover cutting across the school field is inviting noise pollution for the 726 students and teachers.”

MIC’s playing a game


Gunasekaran also said that state exco VS Mogan (MIC) contacted him three days ago asking for more time to discuss and resolve the problem with the relevant authorities.

“Somehow he (Mogan) was aware that we were going to stage a protest and wanted me to call it off. He told me that he needed just one more day to negotiate with the relevant agencies.

“This project was approved in 2009. Why didn’t he raise the matter with PWD and the state government then?” asked Gunasekaran.

“MIC tried to steal a march on us by hurriedly putting up a banner the night before the planned protest. This is the first time in Negeri Sembilan I’m seeing MIC objecting to a government plan.

“The banner is still there but no MIC leader showed up the next morning. Hanging banners is not a big deal as hundreds of NGOs are doing this everywhere.

“My advice to MIC is to please stop politicising this issue,” said Gunasekaran, adding that Pakatan was not politicising the issue as the students’ interest need to be protected.

Gunasekaran said the banner he brought along did not carry his name or the logos of DAP, PAS or PKR even though the state assemblymen from the three parties were present.

“Students’ studies and sports activities need to be protected. We will mobilise bus loads of parents to protest at Parliament if the government still goes ahead with the project.


Relocate the flyover

Meanwhile, Paroi state assemblyman, Mohd Taufek Abdul Ghani (PAS) gave an ultimatum to government to relocate the flyover.

“How are we going to develop the physical and mental capabilities of the children when there is no place for sports activities?

“The size of the field is already small. If 50% of the field is taken up for the project, what is there left for the students?

“As this school sits in my constituency, I will raise this issue in the state assembly sitting scheduled for next month,” said Mohd Taufek.

Also present at the protest were state assemblyman for Port Dickson M Ravi (PKR), Ean Yong Tin Sin (Lukut-DAP), Ng Chin Tsai (Temiang-DAP) and Aminuddin Harun (Sikamat-PKR).

Gerakan Anti-Palanivel in the offing

If the MIC president decides to contest in Cameron Highlands, an ex-MIC branch chairman warns that he will kick off the GAP movement.

PETALING JAYA: A disgruntled former MIC branch chief intends to launch “Gerakan Anti Palanivel” (GAP) if MIC president G Palanivel proceeds with his plan to contest the Cameron Highlands parliamentary seat in the next general election.

Former Taman Mujur, Klang, MIC branch chairman V Thiagarajan, or popularly known as VT Rajan said he will launch the movement to oust Palanivel if the MIC chief does not return the seat to incumbent SK Devamany, who is also deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Department.

Speaking to FMT today, the rebel leader said he would kick off GAP with a gathering on nomination day for the next general election.

He said the movement would draw attention of the Barisan Nasional top leadership and “expose Palanivel’s true colours”.

Rajan was expelled from the party in March this year for failing to apologise for his statement against the party leadership.

He had earlier threatened to form GAP if Palanivel contested any of the four parliamentary seats held by MIC.

The party touted as the largest Indian-based political party in the country won only three of the nine parliamentary seats it contested under the BN banner in the 2008 general election. It won back another seat in a 2010 by-election.

The four seats are Segamat, held by deputy president and Human Resources Minister Dr S Subramaniam; Cameron Highlands and Tapah held by vice-presidents and deputy ministers Devamany and M Saravanan respectively; and through a 2010 by-election, Hulu Selangor (P Kamalanathan).

Secret meetings

Rajan said Palanivel should allow the incumbents to defend their seats instead of “grabbing” the safest seat for his own political survival.

Palanivel was reported to have had a series of secret meetings with Cameron Highlands Umno leaders, allegedly to topple Devamany.

“No right thinking MIC president has ever done this sort of thing before. He is doing a number on his own leaders,” Rajan added.

He claimed that Palanivel often visited Cameron Highlands and had spent few hundred thousand ringgit to beef up his strength in the highlands.

Rajan said he kept silent on the matter for the last six months but immense support he received since announcing the idea to form GAP had forced him to make a stand.

The former branch chairman said he had also received calls from MCA and MIC leaders from Cameron Highlands, who vouched their support for the movement.

“There is nothing personal between me and Palanivel. As a party member it is my responsibility to protect the party from people who try to tarnish MIC for their own agenda,” he added.

The MIC president lost the Hulu Selangor parliamentary seat in the 2008 election with a razor thin 198 vote majority.

He was dropped as BN candidate for the Hulu Selangor parliamentary seat by-election in 2010. The BN top leadership picked Kamalanathan saying that the newcomer as a winnable candidate.

Clear the air on MIED

Rajan also wanted an explanation on the status the Maju Institute for Education Development (MIED), MIC’s education arm.

“Palanivel should clear the air on the status of MIED which runs the AIMST University. It was build with the people’s money. It also received a lot of aid from the government. Now there is talk that AIMST would be privatised after the next general election.

“Normally the MIC president heads the MIED board of directors. But in December, 2011 Palanivel and former vice president KS Nijhar resigned from the board saying that they were saddled with too many responsibilities. But the truth is Palanivel resigned because he could not fight (former president) S Samy Vellu in the board and take over,” claimed Rajan.

He said party members were in the dark over the matter and several police reports had been lodged on the alleged misappropriation of AIMST funds.

“It is Palanivel’s responsibility to explain this matter to MIC members and public at large,” he added.

Religious differences the new danger

The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future, said Samuel P Huntington in 1993.
COMMENT

By Khoo Ying Hooi

Strong protests have swept across the Muslim world over the trailer “Innocence of Muslims” since the video was first released on YouTube, uploaded by its director Sam Bacile.

The low-budget film stirred a wave of anti-American violence which targeted mostly symbols of American influence.

The video illustrates Prophet Muhammad in a negative light, portraying Him as a fool, womaniser and killer.

The debate over the video can be viewed in different perspectives. Some claim it is about freedom of expression and speech, while others say it is politically driven and manipulated.

The film has sparked a delicate debate about how far artistic freedom can be stretched.

YouTube has since blocked access to this video in several countries such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Morocco, including Malaysia and its neighbouring countries, Indonesia and Singapore.

Then a few days ago, a French magazine, Charlie Hebdo, published several insulting caricatures of Prophet Muhammad, including portraying the Prophet naked in the cartoons, which exacerbated the already tense atmosphere in the Muslim world.

In the past, there have been many other controversial publications and artworks that have caused uproar among the Muslims. But this time, the scale of protests has been massive and violent.

Back in 1989, Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for the execution of British author Salman Rushdie for his novel “The Satanic Verses” because it contained some insults in the account of the Prophet Muhammad’s life.

In 2004, a short film “Submission” directed by prominent Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was aired in the Dutch television. The film was intended to feature the abuse of Muslim women; however it became dubious due to several images in the film.

In one of the controversial images, the opening lines of the Quran were written across the naked body of a Muslim woman. Two months after the broadcast, van Gogh was murdered by a young man, Mohammed Bouyeri, on an Amsterdam street.

In 2005, 12 cartoons by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten showed Prophet Muhammad in various humorous situations, including a drawing of the Prophet wearing a lit bomb inside his turban. This sparked violent demonstrations throughout much of the Muslim world.

The clash of civilizations

The theory of the clash of civilizations, first propounded by the influential political scientist Samuel P Huntington in 1993 in the magazine “Foreign Affairs”, just shortly after the end of the Cold War, might be able to shed some light on what is happening now.

The theory came about as a response to Francis Fukuyama’s book in 1992, “The End of History and the Last Man”.

Huntington opined that there will be no longer ideological (political) or economic conflicts in the post-Cold War world; instead the new danger will arise out of the cultural and religious differences between the people, and this will serve as the primary source of conflict.

In his book, “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order”, he stated that “religion is the central defining characteristic of civilizations”.

He emphasised that people are being divided along cultural lines and there is no universal civilization but there are cultural blocks, with each block having its own distinct set of values.

In the 1993 “Foreign Affairs” article, Huntington wrote, and I quote:

“It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.”

If we recall the Sept 11 attacks which have left a strong impact and become a turning point in re-looking into global security, many scholars have turned to Huntington’s theory in seeking to understand the reasons for such attacks.

Some argue that the US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, the war between the West and al-Qaeda and the acts of terrorism by religious extremists are some of the reasons that have led to the escalation of the clash of civilizations.

“The Innocence of Muslims” may not have literally caused the killings of the four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, but the spread of the video has indeed sparked viral protests in many Muslim countries.

Like it or not, whether one agrees with Huntington’s theory, there appears to be a serious conflict between Islam and the Western world. Reconciliation between civilizations is a tough task and will only be achievable in the long term.

The writer is an academic staff in Universiti Malaya and a PhD candidate in the University Putra Malaysia. She is a FMT columnist and can be contacted at yinghooi@gmail.com.

Zahid: If not for infighting, UMNO can do better


(Harakah) - Top UMNO leaders continue giving mixed signals about the party's chances of surviving the next general election, which must be called within the next nine months.

Quoted by Malay daily Sinar Harian, UMNO vice president Zahid gave a less optimistic prediction, saying UMNO would likely perform better than 2008 but not as good as 2004, when BN won by a landslide majority.

Zahid viewed the 13th general election to be more challenging for UMNO.

“(BN) not only need to work hard, but to work smart. We must win the people's hearts. Although I am a vice president, my analysis is not biased and I look at it objectively,” said the Defence minister.

On UMNO’s main challenges, Zahid said it was not due to the challenge posed by Pakatan Rakyat, but due to its internal problems which included “being too comfortable”.

Zahid acknowledged that the issue of UMNO's internal problems had been repeatedly raised since Najib Razak took over party leadership in 2009.

He said it was most visible in states which BN lost in 2008, and warned that factionalism would jeopardise UMNO’s chances in election.

“Although the president, deputy president, vice presidents and supreme council members have been ordered to get to the ground, we still find that the issues have become a stigma for UMNO headquarters,” he said.

Zahid also opined that the election would not be held this year.

In 2008, UMNO-BN lost its traditional two-third parliamentary majority for the first time, four years after sweeping 92 percent of the seats.

Beware Benchmarking Education Against India


They may not all go for the Nobel
They may not all go for the Nobel
(Asia Sentinel) Those impressive numbers of engineering grads belie the fact that too many of them aren't very good

A new report called The Competition that Really Matters, which was released jointly by the Center for American Progress (a Washington DC think tank with close ties to the Obama administration) and the Center for the Next Generation, contends that America’s competitive position is being eroded by the emergence of skilled labor forces in India and China.

The report calls both countries among “our fiercest competitors for the jobs and thought leadership of the future.” Noting the investments China and India are making in improving their human capital, it recommends that the United States substantially increase the level of resources directed at primary and secondary education.

There is certainly a strong case to be made that the US educational system is in urgent need of overhaul. But the new report is reminiscent of Rising Above The Gathering Storm, a widely-publicized 2005 report that was written by an eminent group of US business and scientific leaders. It likewise warned that India and China were quickly acquiring a vast reservoir of low-wage but highly-trained brainpower that would inevitably sap America’s edge in innovation. One of the particular warning indicators it presented was that Chinese universities were churning out some 600,000 engineers a year and India 350,000, but U.S. institutions were only minting 70,000.

In similar fashion, The Competition that Really Matters advises that India “is already producing more students with bachelor’s degrees than is the United States. Over the last seven years, India has tripled its output of four-year degrees in engineering, computer science, and information technology.” It also notes that “seven times more children attend primary school in India than in the United States.”

But quality is really the issue here, rather than mind-boggling quantity. This point was amply underscored when Vivek Wadhwa and his colleagues at Duke University quickly debunked the alarming figures presented in the Rising Above The Gathering Storm report. The Duke study found that engineering numbers cited for China and India were significantly exaggerated since they included holders of associate degrees and vocational certificates along with recipients of bona fide four-year degrees. It concluded that:

“A comparison of like-to-like data suggests that the United States produces a highly significant number of engineers, computer scientists and information technology specialists, and remains competitive as a source of global engineering, computer science and information technology labor.”

Similar arguments also appeared in the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post. Surprisingly, there is no reference to this policy debate in The Competition that Really Matters.

Contrary to the growing Western perception of the country as a technology powerhouse, the quality of Indian graduate education in critical technology fields lags significantly behind the United States and Europe. Concerns about the caliber of India’s legions of engineering graduates have mired New Delhi’s bid for full membership in the Washington Accord, which governs international recognition of foreign engineering degrees. Moreover, the country manages to produce a remarkably small number of PhDs in computer science each year. Indeed, Israel graduates approximately the same number as India despite the gargantuan population disparity. A senior government official in New Delhi a few years back acknowledged that India would never become a great power on the basis of such paltry numbers.

A parade of government officials and corporate leaders has acknowledged the serious disrepair of the Indian university system, including at the most elite schools. Incredibly, given the country’s high-tech image, the Infosys Science Foundation in 2009 was unable to find a worthy recipient for its inaugural prize honoring an Indian researcher in the field of engineering and computer science. And The Journal of the ACM, the world’s leading journal in the computer science field, for a number of years was unable to publish Indian submissions on quality grounds.

According to a widely-consulted scorecard compiled by Shanghai Jiao Tong University, only one Indian school – the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore – is ranked in the top 500 of global universities – and then only in the bottom tiers. Research by the McKinsey Global Institute concludes that only a quarter of Indian engineering graduates are suited for employment by multinational companies. The rest are lacking in requisite technical knowledge, English-language capacity, and collaborative skills.

These findings are underscored in a new report by a British engineering organization. A forthcoming book by Rafiq Dossani also concludes that Indian engineers rank at the bottom when compared to their counterparts in the other BRIC nations.

As one official in the Prime Minister’s office recently acknowledged, “The stark reality is that our education system churns out people, but industry does not find them useful….The necessary development of skills is missing in our education.” This view is echoed by a report four years ago by a parliamentary committee, which observes that the employability of graduates of the country’s technical schools “remains a matter of serious concern.”

The resulting skills gap has fundamental implications for India’s success in the global economy. A 2009 World Bank report found that an acute deficit of civil engineering skills severely jeopardizes the country’s growth prospects. The number of civil engineering graduates from Indian universities will need to increase three-fold in order to make good on New Delhi’s ambitious plans to improve the nation’s decrepit infrastructure. And in order to expand the ramshackle energy sector, India has been forced to rely on tens of thousands of Chinese guest workers. As the chairman of the Central Electricity Authority admitted in a recent interview, “we don’t have that amount of skilled manpower in the country.”

It is true, as The Competition that Really Matters observes, that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s government has dramatically increased funding for primary and secondary education. But so far, more resources have not translated into better outcomes. India not only exhibits the lowest educational indicators in the Group of 20, its public education system scores poorly relative to the other BRIC countries and to other emerging market countries. The 2012-2013 Global Competitiveness Index newly issued by the World Economic Forum places India at 81st, out of 144 nations evaluated, in terms of the quality of primary education, 107th for secondary school enrollment, and 95th for tertiary education enrollment.

In spite of the recent infusion of more government resources, educational indicators remain profoundly disconcerting. According to results released earlier this year by the OECD’s Program for International Student Assessment, Indian eighth-graders scored second to last in a 75-nation ranking of writing and math skills. It is all the more disheartening that the Indian government selected students from Tamil Nadu and Himachal Pradesh to participate in the assessment, since these states are considered among the best in providing elementary schooling.

Although The Competition that Really Matters discusses US PISA scores as well as China’s “Shanghai Shock,” it omits any word about India’s failings.

Similarly, a recent survey released by Pratham, a widely-respected nongovernmental group working to improve educational outcomes for impoverished children, finds that half of the country’s fifth-graders were unable to read at a second-grade level. And despite talk about rising literacy rates, one recent study concluded that the official rates are significantly overstated.

The benchmarks to India used in The Competition that Really Matters conceal just as much as they reveal. Still, the report does exemplify how the imperative of responding to emerging global competition from China and India has become a common theme in U.S. policy circles. President Obama frequently stresses this point. In announcing a new public-private partnership on manufacturing innovation last month, for instance, he justified the initiative by saying it “will help make sure that manufacturing jobs of tomorrow take root not in places like China and India, but right here in the United States of America.”

In a campaign appearance three months ago, Obama argued that the US had to invest more in science and technology so as not to “cede new ideas to countries like China and India.”

Along the same lines, the president regularly refers to the prodigious output of brainpower from the two countries in exhorting the need for education reform in the United States. At a Democratic Party gathering last month, he maintained that unless America repaired its school system, "then we're not going to be able to compete with China or India or Brazil, who are very hungry and know that whichever country has the best workforce, the most highly skilled workforce, is going to be the country that succeeds economically.” And at a gathering in Las Vegas two years ago, he cautioned that if India is “producing more scientists and engineers than we are, we will not succeed.”

But if this argument, at least when it comes to India, is not supported by the data, why has it gained wide currency? My own theory has to do with the conflating of the Indian diaspora’s success in America with the strength of their homeland’s competitive position. The prominent role that India-born engineering and scientific talent plays in driving U.S. prosperity and innovation – most prominently in Silicon Valley – is a significant factor in this confusion.

So, too, is the swelling number of bright and diligent Indian students enrolled in American universities. Indeed, a bipartisan consensus has formed in Washington that the US needs to keep as many of these students in America as possible once they’ve completed their course work. As Obama put it in his January 2011 State of the Union address: “[Students] come here from abroad to study in our colleges and universities. But as soon as they obtain advanced degrees, we send them back home to compete against us. It makes no sense.”

But it should alert us that something is amiss at home when so many of India’s best and brightest choose to pursue their dreams and apply their talents elsewhere. India’s transformations over the past two decades no doubt command the world’s respect, though they should not blind us to the daunting challenges it still confronts, perhaps none more formidable than in the area of human capital development. The country’s prodigious demographic resources – it will in a decade or so overtake China as the world’s most populous country – could one day be the basis for India’s emergence as a full-fledged global power. But for now it remains an open question whether India has the capacity to distill raw potential into actual achievement.

(David J. Karl is president of the Asia Strategy Initiative, an analysis and advisory firm based in Los Angeles. He blogs on South Asia at Chanakya’s Notebook and can be followed on Twitter @davidjkarl.)

Malaysia catat pertumbuhan negatif selama 24 tahun- Anwar

(Oleh: Sidiqin Omar)

KUALA LUMPUR 24 Sept: Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berkata, sejak 1988 hingga 2011, belanjawan negara mencatat pertumbuhan negatif pada kadar 2.89 peratus daripada Kadar Keluaran Dalam Negara Kasar (KDNK).

Anwar dalam soalan tambahannya kepada Timbalan Menteri Kewangan, Donald Lim Siang Chai menyatakan, rekod positif dicatat hanya pada tahun 1997, iaitu pada kadar 2.4 peratus.

“Gambaran ini membimbangkan. Profil kredit meningkat. Amaran ini harus diambil secara serius. Kalau kita lihat Laporan Ketua Audit Negara (LKAN), unjuran tahun demi tahun tidak sampai sasaran,” katanya.

Anwar turut merujuk amaran perunding kewangan antarabangsa, Standard & Poor agar Malaysia menurunkan kadar kredit.

“Kewangan awam negara rendah secara relatif kepada persekitaran yang pelbagai. Malaysia kini setanding atau lebih tinggi kadar hutang seperti krisis yang melanda Itali,” kata Anwar memetik Fitch Ratings.

Tambah Anwar, jawapan Timbalan Menteri Kewangan tidak menjelaskan tentang kadar hutang negara yang kini berjumlah RM437 bilion, melainkan penegasan bahawa paras hutang negara kononnya masih selamat, iaitu pada kadar 53% berbanding KDNK, dua peratus dibawah paras berbahaya (55%)

Manakala menurut Donald, kerajaan turut mengadakan siri jelajah ke seluruh negara untuk menerangkan kepada rakyat berkenaan cukai barangan dan perkhidmatan (GST)

“Credit Suisse menyatakan sasaran Malaysia tidak tercapai. World Economic Forum menyatakan imbangan belanja kerajaan jatuh ke tangga 96 dari 110 (negara).

“Langkah-langkah yang diambil diumumkan, tetapi bagaimana diukur keberkesanannya. Sebagai contoh melalui penilaian LKAN atau laporan Transperency International.

“Kita (Parlimen) tidak usul supaya diumumkan pemotongan perbelanjaan kerajaan, (dan) menekankan subsidi kepada golongan miskin.

“Apakah unjuran yang disebut Timbalan Menteri Kewangan akan dapat dicapai berdasar kepada kenyataan Perdana Menteri?

“Yang (hanya) ditekankan tentang pembaziran atau disebut leakage (kebocoran). Ini menuntut kita mengambil langkah serius mulai sekarang,” tegasnya.

Majlis Presiden dan pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat kini sedang bermesyuarat bagi membincangkan butiran Belanjawan Alternatif 2013 yang akan dibentangkan dalam masa terdekat.

Listen, Malaysians — Ali Kadir



SEPT 25 — I don’t know about you but I am disgusted with Umno and its sycophants, MCA and Gerakan, and I believe that we have to reject them wholesale for:

1) The culture of idiocy they nurture. There is a difference between BN and Pakatan Rakyat.

Whenever Lim Guan Eng or Khalid Ibrahim is accused of wrongdoing, they don’t hide. They come out with proof, sue to clear their name and even engage international audit firms. In contrast, till today no one knows how Altantuya Shaariibuu’s immigration records were erased or why the RM250 million sweet deal was given to Shahrizat Abdul Jalil’s family or how Cabinet ministers are able to live a life of luxury on RM18,000 a month.

Till today, there has been no rebuttal of the fact that millions of ringgit were paid in kickbacks to the highest offices in Putrajaya from a submarine deal.

2) The dumbing down of Malaysia. Umno newsletter, the New Straits Times, reported that local NGOs had received RM20 million to destabilise the government. These journalists must be as dense as their political masters.

And now we have Gerakan politicians going after possibly the cleanest politician in Penang.

See, this is the new strategy of the desperate: if you feel threatened by any individual or organisation just keep on flinging mud at them and hope that some of it sticks.

What Teng Chang Yeow and gang must understand is this: people are aware of the hypocrisy. For nearly two decades, Koh Tsu Koon and Gerakan did nothing and played dead when the state was being ravaged by Umno thieves.

And now when they are out of power and irrelevant, they are suddenly talking about corruption, etc.

3) The culture of violence. Roughhouse tactics are being used by Umno and their associates to intimidate undergraduates contesting campus elections aligned with the opposition.

There is no longer any sense of decency. They just want to remain in power and want to silence any dissent.

We have a choice: we either put up and shut up OR we kick them out.

* Ali Kadir reads The Malaysian Insider.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

Bar Council man suggests court order against Bersih invalid

The Malaysian Insider 
by Hafidz Baharom

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 24 ― The court order barring Bersih rally participants on April 28 from entering Merdeka Square may have been null and void, the Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) public inquiry heard today.
Roger Chan, a Bar Council observer, said the court order had not been gazetted by a government-certified printer as was required under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), during the testimony of the former police chief of Dang Wangi district.

“ACP Mohamad Zulkarnain Abd Rahman, are you aware that if a notice is not gazetted, then the court order is considered null and void?” he said, asking the former police chief of Dang Wangi district who answered in the affirmative.

Chan said that if the court order had not been gazetted, then the barricades erected around the square were illegal. Mohamad Zulkarnain disagreed.

“If you did not see anything or hear anything, was there still a threat to public health and national security?” Chan asked.

Mohamad Zulkarnain said the protesters were still a threat to public health and national security since the roads could not be used and they were disrupting the peace.

Bersih observer Andrew Khoo also grilled the senior police officer on the contents of the court order, noting that the court’s designated “forbidden zone” had not included Lebuh Pasar and Jalan Tun Perak where barricades were set up. “I don’t contend the court order, but I do not remember this map included with the court order,” Mohamad Zulkarnain said.

Khoo said that the court order also included a paragraph that said the police did not receive any notification from Bersih by April 26 regarding the rally, a point he contested with a letter from Empower dated April 13.

“The language in this court order was written by someone else. I used my authority to sign it,” Mohamad Zulkarnain said.

But panel chief Datuk Dr Khaw Lake Tee said that the police officer, being the signatory, had to bear the responsibility for the sworn statement that was the basis of the court order.

When asked if he could specify the chain of command, Mohamad Zulkarnain said the Kuala Lumpur Chief of Police (CPO), Datuk Mohmad Salleh, or his deputy could have given orders to his subordinates directly.

The response prompted Danial Albert, a second Bersih observer, to suggest Mohmad be called as a witness given that he may have overridden Mohamad Zulkarnain on the day.

“Seeing as how this witness testified that the CPO could be giving contradicting orders of the ACP, we ask that he be brought forward to testify in front of the panel,” said Danial Albert, another Bersih observer.

The panel chief agreed and asked the SUHAKAM secretariat and police observers to work on the request.

The inquiry resumes on October 8.

Government Promotes Religious Tolerance

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 25 (Bernama) -- A special allocation provided to houses of worship is a testimony that the government is fostering religious tolerance and cultural diversity, said Political Secretary to the Prime Minister Datuk Mohd Shafie Abdullah.

He said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak was concerned with religious needs of the people of various races in the country.

"Since taking over the reins in 2009, the prime minister has introduced the 1Malaysia concept which was instrumental in promoting religious tolerance and cultural diversity," he said when presenting a RM330,000 grant to the Sri Ramar Alayam Temple, here Tuesday.

The allocation was received by the temple secretary, M.Pushpagaran.

Shafie said as a result, religious tolerance was on the rise while cultural diversity was accepted by all races without fear.

Stop persecution of Suaram

A vigil was held in Kuala Lumpur tonight to express solidarity with Suaram which now finds itself under siege.
While Suaram is accused of having received foreign funds, it appears that the US military has been providing training assistance to its Malaysian counterparts. Read this Aliran statement.