Share |

Saturday, 8 October 2011

Ani – Ghost City of 1001 Churches


Ani – some call it the City of 1001 Churches, others the City of Forty Gates.  Yet no one has called it home for more than three centuries.

Abandoned by its once prosperous and powerful inhabitants, it is situated on the Turkish side of a militarised zone between the border of Turkey and Armenia. 

The city of Ani is no stranger to death, destruction and desertion.



It is a ghost city today but once its Armenian inhabitants numbered close to 200 thousand.  In its heyday it was a metropolis which rivalled Constantinople, Cairo or Baghdad as a center of culture and enterprise.  Although it was never on traditional trade routes its sheer size and power commanded visits by merchants from all directions.  Yet what happened to reduce this once magnificent and regionally dominant city to virtually dust?

The city is the victim of a colossal and centuries old struggle for power between various factions in the region.  Founded in the fourth or fifth century AD the following millennium saw Armenians, Kurds, Georgians, Mongols and Turks struggle for and ascend to power in the city-state.




Almost each time a faction rose to power the city was ransacked almost to the point of obliteration.  Ani finally wheezed its metaphorical last breath by the middle of the eighteenth century, exhausted to extinction, as it were, by the constant struggle for supremacy over its dominion.




The city was originally Armenian and the territory on which it stands is still disputed between modern day Turkey and Armenia.  It was first mentioned in the annals of the Armenian Kamsarakan dynasty in the fifth century AD.  They were one of the seven great houses of Parthia and their origins went back to the Persian Arsacid – a major Iran based power.

The name of the city seems to have come from Ani-Kamakh, an Armenian fortress but was also known as Khnamk though historians do not really know why.  The best suggestion is that it comes from the Armenian for to take care of.  Certainly, the city was designed for just that – to protect and shelter its citizens. It is situated on a triangular plain.  At its height it must have been an extraordinarily visually striking sight for approaching visitors.  Chosen for its naturally defensive situation, to the east it is protected by a ravine and river, to the west a steep valley.

The early ninth century saw the decline of the Kamsarakans and they were replaced by another Armenian dynasty, the Bagratuni.  Their leaders referred to themselves as ishkhan or princes and they ruled over perhaps the most peaceful period of Ani’s history.  A pivotal point for the success of the city came in 992 when the head Bishops of the Armenian Church moved their sear to the thriving city state.  Its population doubled within a century, which while not remarkable in modern terms must have seemed like a golden age of growth for the Bagratuni.




A pair of quarrelling siblings would start Ani’s protracted but inexorable decline.  When King Gagik I died in 1020 neither of his sons would defer to the other and so the kingdom was split apart.  The older, Hovhannes Smbat took over Ani and the younger, Ashot, the rest of the Bagratuni principality.

Hovannes Smbat wanted and needed peace in his time so struck a deal which meant just that but would have terrible long term consequences for the city.  He knew that the neighboring Byzantine Empire regarded his lands with envious eyes and that slowly and surely they were drawing plans against him.  So he did something quite remarkable. To avoid invasion he promised his kingdom after his death to the Byzantine Emperor, Basil, and made him his heir.

When Hovannes Smbat died in 1041, Basil’s successor, Michael IV, obviously wanted what had been promised and claimed sovereignty.  The new King of Ani, Gagik II, was having none of this and managed to fight back no less than three armies sent to capture the city.  However, the still living Ashot was captured and although he had never been king of Ani, this final humiliation led to the surrender of the city.

So, in 1045 Ani became a Byzantine city, together with a Greek governor. It was now part of what people called The New Rome.  Not for too long, however.  The Seljuk Turks had other ideas for the city and in 1064 the army of their Sultan, Alp Arslan (aided by the Georgians under King Bagrat) laid siege to the city.




The blockade lasted three weeks.  As a more modern saying goes, we are as a society only nine meals away from anarchy so although three weeks may not seem a long time, the conditions within the city must have been horrific.  Worse was to come.  Once the city was captured, Sultan Alp Arslan ordered the complete and total slaughter of the population.



Yet that was not the end of Ani.  Many of the Armenian population had escaped the slaughter through fleeing before the siege and slowly and surely they returned.  The Sultan eventually became disinterested in the city and sold it, lock stock and barrel to a Muslin Kurdish dynasty known as the Shaddadids. The 1001 churches would be joined by mosques.



An uneasy peace settled between the overwhelmingly Christian and Armenian population and their new Muslim overlords.  Generally the Shaddaddis attempted through a process of conciliation and intermarriage with the Bagratid nobility (who were still around!) to keep that peace.  They had to – each time the population felt that they overstepped the mark in terms of governance they appealed to the neighboring (and Christian) kingdom of Georgia for help.

The Georgians were happy to oblige.  They invaded and held the city not once or twice but three times (1124, 61 and 71).  Each time they would chastise and punish the Shaddadids while eventually releasing power back to them.  It was not a happy time for the Armenian population.

Eventually the Georgians, under their legendary Queen Tamara, took final and decisive action in 1199.  They removed the Shaddadids permanently from power and gave governorship of the city to the Armenians.  These successors of the Bagratids formed a new dynasty, almost three hundred years before Columbus reached America, naming it after their General and founder, Zakare and calling themselves the Zakarids.

Wealth, trade and prosperity returned to the city.  Yet mayhem and massacre was only a generation away – from yet another new enemy.  In 1236 the Mongols captured Ani and put a large percentage of the population to the sword.  The Zakarids were allowed to continue to rule but as Mongol rather than Georgian vassals. It was here that the decline of the city started to gather momentum.

By the fourteenth century the city came under the control of a series of Turkish dynasties.  The Armenian bishopric left in 1441 and in 1571 the city came under the control of the Ottoman Empire which consistently neglected it. The small population that persisted for some time after was itself gone by 1750.

The city was ‘rediscovered’ by archaeologists during the next century.  Several excavations took place but further damage would be done after the First World War.  Turkey and Armenia continued to militarily fight over territory until 1921 when Ani, much to the chagrin of the Armenians, was contained within the borders of Turkey.

The neglect this valuable archaeological site suffered at the hands of the Turkish authorities can hardly be called benign.  In May 1921 the Turkish Assembly sent a message to the commander of their Eastern Front, authorizing that the "monuments of Ani be wiped off the face of the earth".

Although this did not happen completely, it is to Turkey’s shame the order was ever give and the following decades of neglect only add to that. The Global Heritage Fund, as recently as October of 2010 reported that Ani is "On the Verge" of irreparable loss and obliteration, citing inadequate management and looting as the main causes.

MIC thumbs up, NGO thumbs down

MIC leaders are full of praise for the Budget 2012, but a NGO leader says the Indian community has gotten 'peanuts'.

KUALA LUMPUR: The Budget 2012 evoked mixed reactions from MIC leaders and a NGO leader, with one lauding it and the other panning it.

Describing it as a “people’s budget”, MIC vice-president SK Devamany said it proved that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak was concerned about the Indian community.

Under the Budget, the government allocated RM100 million for Tamil schools and another RM 100 million for Indian entrepreneurs under the Amanah Ikthiar Scheme.

“The allocation for Tamil schools clearly indicates that the premier is passionate about education and student development,” Devamany told FMT.

The deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Deparment added that the macro credit would also empower the Indian community and help usher it into the economic mainstream.

Apart from this, he said the allocation for Karisma, which provided assistance to the poor, senior citizens, children and disabled people as well as the abolishment of school fees would also benefit the community.

“The budget is truly based on the 1Malaysia concept where all regardless of race are taken into account,” he said.

MIC secretary general S Murugesan also praised the Budget, unveiled by Najib in the Dewan Rakyat this evening.

“With the budget, the nation will continue to increase in terms of economic and social developments,” he told FMT.

He added that it was a proper budget, which came about in a timely manner due to the increase in living cost.

‘We are given peanuts’

However, Malaysian Indian Progressive Association (MIPAS) president A Rajaretnam was disappointed, claiming that Najib had given “peanuts” to the community.

“We representing over 200 Indian-based NGOs requested Najib to provide at least RM2 billion to cater for the needs of the Indian community,” he said, adding that only 10% of this was allocated.

“What can the community do with RM200 million?” he asked.

Furthermore, he pointed out that MIC president G Palanivel himself had requested Najib to allocate RM5billion.

“It seems like Najib has once again played out the community,” he said.

By Azmi Sharom, The Star
My problem with religion-based law making, is the idea that it cannot be questioned because it is divine in origin. In a democracy, if we can’t question the laws that affect our lives, then it is not a democracy at all.

POOR Fulham. Despite thoroughly thrashing Tony Fernandes’ Queens Park Rangers 6-0, all the sports headlines were about the other London derby where Tottenham Hotspur edged Arsenal 2-1. I suppose it is all about perception; just what is important and what is not.

As much as I would like to think that the game at White Hart Lane is an indication that the power in North London has shifted to Seven Sisters road, I am ever cautious and am reminded of the saying that a swallow does not a summer make.

Although I suppose in the case of the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry, considering that we have beaten them three times in the last four league clashes, it just may be there is more than one swallow fluttering about.
However, I digress. My earlier point remains and that is the perception of what is important and what is not.

At the moment, there are all sorts of news stories floating about and they point towards one thing, elections.

PAS has once again raised the hudud issue. Frankly, I am not too worried about this matter.

Pakatan Rakyat has stated that they will not go on with hudud unless all the component parties agree.
This seems highly unlikely as DAP will never agree and I am sure there are some voices in Keadilan too who will not be comfortable with hudud.

However, if they do try to introduce it, I will most certainly object.

The reason why I object is encapsulated in Hadi’s (PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang) statement in the press on the matter (if it was accurately reported) where he said that hudud cannot be questioned.

Whoa there, “cannot be questioned”? I am sorry, if you have personal beliefs that affect only you and you won’t question them, that’s all fine and dandy.

But if you are going to introduce something into the public sphere, something that will affect the lives of the citizens, I don’t care if the source of what you are introducing is divine, it jolly well better be questioned.

And I don’t care if you say I have no degree from Al-Azhar and no goatee to go along with it, I will question any law that any government wants to introduce.

This has been my problem with any religion-based law making, the idea that simply because it is divine in origin means it can’t be questioned. In a democracy, if we can’t question the laws that affect our lives, then it is not a democracy at all.

And then there is poor Mat Sabu; charged with criminal defamation for questioning the heroism of the policemen who fought at Bukit Kepong.

I checked the Penal Code and sure enough, criminal defamation can be committed against the dead.

It’s a bit weird because how far back does this provision extend? I mean in historical matters there will always be different perspectives and differing opinions based on new findings and discoveries.

In case the Government decides to charge me with criminal defamation for questioning the character of one of our early leaders, let me use an American example.
Thomas Jefferson; renaissance man who helped draft the American Constitution and ensured a modern democracy where all men were created equal, or a shameless hypocrite slave owner who fathered numerous children with his female slaves?
Both views are correct and depending on your own take on history the view that will take precedence will differ.
And surely that was what Mat Sabu’s statement was; his take on history.

Was it insensitive, probably, should he be prosecuted for it, I don’t think so.

However, all these issues are really not that important to me. I think they are just the usual sound and fury that come with politicians posturing in the light that elections are coming.

The real important story for now should be the Budget and more importantly the alternative budget that the Pakatan has unveiled.

It is really good to see Pakatan acting like they have a Shadow Cabinet (although they don’t have one really).

We need to see concrete counter proposals from the opposition to not only help us question the Government’s Budget but also to assess the alternatives which a different government could give. This is vital in a mature democracy.

I certainly hope that discussions in the next couple of weeks will be about comparing the two budgets for surely that is more important than a hudud law which is unlikely to be implemented and Mat Sabu’s supposed lack of patriotism.

Miss Universe Goes Sideways in Indonesia


Image
No jilbab for me, thanks.
Religion, corruption and money mar a publicity tour
What should have been a routine publicity tour in Indonesia for a newly crowned international beauty has turned into a series of gaffes that underscores two nagging issues in the country: religion and corruption.

In town for a week of publicity events to culminate in the crowning of the next Miss Indonesia tonight, Angolan lovely Leila Lopes, the new Miss Universe, was offered Rp750 million (US$84,000) to attend a police event in Bandung, the anniversary of the West Java Branch of the Association of the Wives of the National Police, supposedly an event held for charity.

When the size of the appearance fee became public, it raised a furor, with the Internet exploding with questions over where that amount of money was coming from. Police critic Bambang Widodo Umar demanded that the national police chief summon the West Java chief for questioning.

“The money would be better used to help low-ranking police officers or help their children go to school,” Umar told a local television station. That in turn kicked off a controversy in local papers, with readers saying local police make lots of money demanding bribes for everything they do.

Although police said the money was raised partly through contributions from local police officials, one of the organizers of the event said no money had been raised from the police.

The trip to Bandung itself was suddenly called off when local leaders of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), Indonesia’s top Muslim clerical body, said that woman who has risen to fame – and fortune, judging by the size of the appearance fee by displaying her body on stage was not fit to attend a charity event.

It must be a little dizzying for the Angola-born Lopes, who until last month was a business management student in the UK before winning the right to represent her country in the Miss Universe pageant in Sao Paulo, Brazil on Sept. 12. The stunning 5 foot 10-1/2 inch beauty has thus been given a full dose of Indonesia's often-baffling politics.

Corruption is so rampant in the country – and the public is so fed up with it to judge by recent polls that show respect for political leaders and police at an all time low – that the idea of police spouses tossing around tens of thousands of dollars on a beauty queen made a pretty tempting target.

As for the morality police, Indonesia sends its own scantily clad beauties to the contest, much to the chagrin of strait-laced clerics who would rather turn the normally moderate country into something resembling Saudi Arabia. A year ago, a band of Islamic clerics denounced the 2010 Miss Indonesia, Qori Sandioriva, who was first crowned Miss Aceh, for “bringing shame” to the conservative semi-autonomous province by abandoning its Muslim values on her way to winning the title.

Aceh, which enforces a controversial shariah code on its citizens, doesn’t allow swimsuit contests. The clerics vainly demanded that Sandioriva wear a jilbab, a Muslim headscarf, to the Miss Universe contest. The demand was ignored, as are most calls for freewheeling Indonesians to give up partying in a country that for all the noise of the clerics and many right-wing Islamists, is constitutionally and proudly secular. .

As to Lopes’ visit to the police association event, critics questioned not only why the women’s association had agreed to pay such an exorbitant fee but why the Angolan beauty queen had even been asked to appear. Police said her appearance was designed to “create a positive image for the national police,” leading bloggers to question what it was that a beauty queen could do to raise the image of the country’s corruption-riddled police force. If anything, one might think that associating with the Indonesian police might damage Miss Universe’s reputation.

Lopes later told a local television station she was calling off the trip. A spokesman for MUI said the process of judging women by their physical attributes was deeply offensive and damaging to women’s dignity, making Lopes an improper guest for a charity function.

He did say she could come to Bandung and go shopping in the city’s many factory outlets. “But if she only wants to shop at the factory outlets, please,” he was quoted as saying. “Even it will be better if she brings lots of money to shop here.”

He added that the council would have gladly seen the city welcome a Nobel Prize winner or world-class athlete, rather than a Miss Universe.

“There are [selection] sessions in which the [contestants] were only wearing bikinis. Even their height and breast size are measured. It is banned in Islam, while it is highly adored in the process as if they have a high degree of value,” said Rafani Akhyar, general secretary of the council.

“This is the difference between Islamic and secular states,” he said, conveniently forgetting that Indonesia is not an Islamic state despite its Muslim-majority population.

Masruchah, the deputy chairwoman of the National Commission on Violence Against Women, said the MUI had more substantial issues it could address.

“This is just man’s way to politicize the issue using the name of religion,” she said. “Even with women wearing fully covered outfits and veils, if the man has a nasty mind, it won’t make a difference. Fix the mind, not the women.”

(With reporting from the Jakarta Globe)

Najib goes after voters with fistfuls of cash in populist elections Budget

Najib goes after voters with fistfuls of cash in populist elections BudgetUPDATE 6 As expected, Prime Minister Najib Razak unveiled a Budget 2012 stashed with cash goodies aimed to lure voters back to the BN fold, but it was immediately shot down not just by opposition but also by financial experts who gawked at his overly rosy economic projections.
In Budget 2012, Najib forecast GDP growth of 5 to 6% while the deficit was to drop to 4.7% from a projected 5.4% in 2011.
“That’s a pretty bullish outlook relative to the street and relative to ourselves as well. We’re looking at 4 per cent this year and 4.2 per cent next year. Second-half growth has to turn up to 5.5 per cent to average even 5 per cent. So that looks a bit optimistic from my view,” Hak Bin Chua from Merrill Lynch Bank of America told Reuters.
Faking it with overblown growth projections, no details on where money to come from

But Najib, who is also Finance minister, may have no choice. If he did not 'fake' his projections, there may not be enough to finance the plans he unveiled. There were no details as to where the money would come from other than the plucked-from-the-air increase in GDP growth that was noted and panned by banking and financial experts.
"Perhaps the most worrying is that Malaysians are like the proverbial frog in the hot soup, where the frog does not realise the soup is slowly but surely reaching the boiling point," Tony Pua, the DAP MP for Petaling Jaya Utara, said in an immediate reaction.
"We may not yet be facing the crisis of Greek proportions, but Budget 2012 is doing very little to avert such eventuality, leaving the Malaysian economy nakedly exposed to the inevitability."
Buttering up Felda settlers and the civil service
On Friday, the scandal-tained 58-year-old Najib presented a RM232 billion budget, with RM181.6bil for management and RM51.2bil for development. He also announced the much-anticipated listing of Felda Global Ventures, promising a 'windfall' for all settlers - who now number some 2 million in total, including their children and grandchildren. Obviously, the Felda folk will form  a crucial and core voting bloc for his Umno party.
There were no individual or corporate tax cuts as speculated, despite plans to launch an unpopular and hefty Goods and Services Tax or GST after the 13th General Election.
Najib also increased employers’ contribution for the Employees Provident Fund from 12% to 13% for those earning RM5,000 and below.This obviously is good for the employee but puts more money into the EPF, which has come under fire for questionable loans to government-linked firms and agencies, such as the recent and unannounced RM6billion loan to Felda.
He also announced an additional half-month salary bonus, with a minimum of RM500 for government pensioners, to be paid together with the December 2011 salary. So, for the whole of 2011, including previously declared bonuses, a total RM1,000 minimum has been announced for civil servants and government pensioners. This will benefit some 1.3 million civil servants, 618,000 pensioners and will cost the government RM4 billion.
“Najib has promised everything on earth but he doesn’t talk about increasing revenues or transparency. It is unrealistic. It is clearly an election ploy. In the last 10 years, growth, deficit and foreign investment figures have always been proven to be wrong,” Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim said in an immediate response to reporters.
Wooing back lower income group hit by subsidy cuts
For the lower-income groups, who have been upset at his slashing of subsidies for consumer essentials including petrol, cooking gas and sugar, rather than touch the RM19 billion gas subsidies given to crony-Independent Power Producers, Najib unabashedly courted them fistfuls of cash.
He announced a one-off RM500 cash assistance for households earning 3,000 per month and below, which will set the government back RM1.8 billion to benefit 3.4 milliion households, a one-off RM100 schooling assistance for primary and secondary school students from age 6 to 16, up to Form 5, which will cost taxpayers RM530 million, and a one-off RM200 book vouchers for students of private and public tertiary institution for Form 6 students, costing RM260 million.
EPF would also be allowed to ring fence RM1,300 from Account 2 of contributors for the purpose of pilgrimage to Mecca. The money will stay with the contributors, while they register for the Haj, which can a very long waiting list.
"It is very simple to tell whether or not it is an election ploy - just look at the number of one-off cash assistance. Najib is looking to buy GE-13 but my feeling is Malaysians are smarter. They should take the money, which actually comes from the tax that they or their parents pay, and then make sure the BN is booted out once and for all before they bankrupt Malaysia," PKR vice president Tian Chua told Malaysia Chronicle.
Main projects in 2012
Total revenue for 2012 was forecast to increase 1.9% to RM186.9bil and the deficit to decrease to 4.7% of GDP from 5.4% in 2011. Najib also set aside RM29.8bil for investment in infrastructure, industrial and rural development and RM13.6bil for the social sector, including education and training, welfare, housing and community development.
The PM, who had to put on hold his New Economic Model after heated protest from hardliners in his Umno party, also announced plans to "focus on accelerating investment and further liberalise 17 services sub-sectors, in places enabling 100% foreign equity." However, given that he did not immediately detail the sectors, these are expected to be non-critical and little-demanded sectors.
Among main projects to be implemented in 2012 are the East Coast from Jabor to Terengganu and road upgrades from Kota Marudu to Ranau. RM18bil of the RM20bil PPP Facilitation Fund will be used for high impact projects, with RM2 billion for bumiputera entrepreneurs. The government will also allocate RM978mil to accelerate the development in five regional corridors namely, Coastal Highway JB-Nusa Jaya,Taiping Heritage tourism project, Besut agropolitan project, Lahad Datu palm oil cluster project and water supply in Samalaju.
The Treasury Management Centre will be established and offer incentives to develop M'sia as a competitive financial centre. The Kuala Lumpur International Financial District will also kick off, with incentives including income tax exemptions for firms.
Property tax up, school fees abiolished
Real property gains tax was also raised from 5% to 10% if sold within 2 years; if sold between 2-5 years, it would stay at 5%; if sold after 5 years, it would be zero. RPGT was set at a 5% flat rate for properties disposed of within five years of purchase since April 1, 2007.
All primary and secondary school fees were to be abolished beginning with 2012 school term. This will cost the government RM150 million. Education would be allocated RM50.2 billion, of which RM1.9 billion for all schools, including mission and vernacular schools, RM1 billion for upgrade of schools premises (RM500 million for SRK, RM100 million for SRJK (Chinese), RM100 mil SRJK (Tamil), RM10 million for mission schools, RM100 million for Sekolah Agama Bantuan, RM100 million to MRSM - Mara secondary schools).
For the rural sector, Felda again walked away with the biggest goodies. Najib promised a RM400 million upgrade of water supply system in Pahang, Kedah, Kelantan and Terengganu.
He also set aside RM150 million for rural public transportation via SME bank for bus companies in low interest loans of 4% interest, and RM90 million for the Orang Asli for basic needs, including treated water and income generation, RM20 million for the community affected by Cameron Highlands landslide.
The civil service were not left out, with teachers receining the lion's share. Teachers will now get 'time-based pay rise schemes', so teachers can go up the ladder faster. Effectively, it was an annual pay rise from RM80 to RM320 according to grade, or up 7-13%.
Senior citizens won't have to pay outpatient fees at all government hospitals and clinics. 50% discount on LRT and monorail.

Budget 2012 fails to live up to the Prime Minister’s reform pledges in NEM, GTP and ETP

Media Statement by Tony Pua, DAP National Publicity Secretary and Member of Parliament for Petaling Jaya Utara in Kuala Lumpur

The expectations were high for a pre-election budget where Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak will stamp his “reformist” credentials. It is for the Prime Minister to put into action the various reform pledges made in his cornerstone policy blueprints – the New Economic Model (NEM), Government Transformation Programme (GTP) and the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP).

However, the announcement of the budget left much to be desired as little has changed beyond tweaking the budget of the previous financial year. Instead what is perhaps the most worrying is that Malaysians are like the proverbial frog in the hot soup – where the frog does not realise the soup is slowly but surely reaching the boiling point.

We may not yet be facing the crisis of Greek proportions, but Budget 2012 is doing very little to avert such eventuality, leaving the Malaysian economy nakedly exposed to the inevitability.

Federal Government Debt

Our Federal Government debt has increased rapidly from RM242 billion in 2004 to RM363 billion in 2009 and RM456 billion in 2011. That represents a marked 88.4% increase in debt over the past 7 years. It is also an increase of 25.6% or nearly RM100 billion over 2 years.

The increase in debt has increased the pressure on reigning in our budget deficit as our annual debt service commitments have increased to RM20.5 billion next year from only half the amount 5 years ago in 2007.

While our federal government debt to GDP ratio is still at a moderate 53.8%, a far cry from Greece’s 117%, we are not far from Spain’s 64% or Ireland’s 67%, both of whom are facing economic turbulence of their own.

Our debt levels will only worsen in the next few years as we embark on record levels of infrastructure spending such as the RM53 billion Klang Valley MRT project which is expected to be funded entirely on debt.

Wages and Pensions

At the same time, our public sector expenditure is increasingly mirroring that of the European countries with ballooning civil service obligations. The budgeted expenditure for wages and pensions for 2012 is a whopping RM64.1 billion, an increase of RM6.2 billion or 10.8% budgeted for 2011. The increase is even more worrying when contrasted against the budgeted RM36.9 billion 2007, a 73.7% increase in just 5 years.

The GTP had promised a more efficient and cost effective government and civil service. What we are seeing from the Budget is only on which is indebting our children, entrenching our structural problems and very weak expenditure controls.

Economic Growth

Despite the Governments efforts in the ETP, our manufacturing and export statistics paint a starkly different picture.

Our export sector grew a miserly 2.7% in 2011 against 13.2% in 2010. However, we should be further alarmed by the fact that the growth was a result of increased contributions from exports of rubber, paper, textiles, clothes and shoes which grew in excess of 15%, and the petroleum products by 9.3%. Our electrical and electronics sector, which constitutes 26.4% of our total exports industry shrunk by 4.9% in 2011.

From the above indicators, there appears to be a shift away from higher value-added export sectors to the primary products industry such as rubber, wood, textiles and crude oil. This is the exact reverse of what we are trying to achieve via the ETP.

Budget deficit

Based on the Economic Report, we are expected to meet our deficit target of 5.4% for this year only because our revenues had grown beyond the expected in the 2010 budget due to very strong commodity prices. The Government has managed to collect RM21.1 billion of extra revenue on top of the originally budget RM165.8 billion. If not for the unexpected increase in government revenue, our budget deficit would have been a shocking 7.9%.

The Government is planning a 4.7% deficit for 2012, a figure which doesn’t give hope that the 2.5% deficit target promised by Najib can be met by 2015. Even then, based on poor expenditure controls and the habitual ad hoc expenditure patterns of past BN governments, even meeting the 4.7% target will be a challenge, especially if commodity prices were to fall below expectations next year.

Optimistic projections

Finally, despite having achieved on 4.2% growth in the first half of 2011, and a slowing global economy in the face of another potential economic crisis, the Government has retained its unrealistic growth assumptions of 5.0 to 5.5%. To meet the target, Malaysia’s economy will have to grow by at least 5.7% in the 2nd half of the year, which is highly optimistic to say the least.

The Federal Government’s unrealistic expectations coupled with a budget which failed to demonstrate substantive reforms and political will for change makes the 2012 budget a highly disappointing and puts in serious doubt our ability to become a high income nation as aspired in Najib’s New Economic Model.

Wide-Ranging Perks To Strengthen Domestic Economy In 2012 Budget

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak when tabling 2012 Budget in Parliament today.Pic: fotoBernamaKUALA LUMPUR, Oct 7 (Bernama) -- Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak today unveiled the 2012 Budget, providing a gamut of incentives to further strengthen the domestic economy, a RM6 billion special stimulus package, perks to attract investments and boost the Islamic sukuk market, banking, finance and hospitality industries, as well as much-awaited support for small-and medium- scale enterprises.

Najib, who is also Finance Minister, also announced that Felda Global Ventures Holdings will be listed by mid-next year to raise funds for the land development agency to emerge as a global conglomerate as well as income tax exemptions to accelerate development of the Kuala Lumpur International Financial District (KLIFD).

"The listing will create another blue chip plantation company besides attracting international investors to Bursa Malaysia," he said when tabling 2012 Budget in Parliament today.

In clearly keeping the wheels well-oiled in Malaysia's economic transformation process, Najib said 17 services sub-sectors will be liberalised besides an allocation of RM2.5 billion under the public-private partnership (PPP) facilitation fund with RM300 million for Bumiputera entrepreneurs.

To accelerate development of the five regional corridors, the government will allocate RM978 million including an agropolitan scheme in Besut, Terengganu, and a palm oil industrial cluster project in Lahad Datu, Sabah, and Samalaju water supply project in Sarawak.

In efforts to woo multinational corporations and establish treasury management services, the government has proposed an income tax exemption of 70 per cent for five years, witholding tax exemption on interest payments on borrowings and stamp duty exemption on loans and service agreements.

Najib said the 2012 Budget will cost RM232.8 billion, of which RM181.6 billion is for operating expenditure and RM51.2 billion for development.

Of the development expenditure, RM29.8 billion is provided for the economic sector to support infrastructure needs, industry, agriculture and rural development.

As for the KLIFD, Najib proposed a 100 per cent income tax exemtpion for 10 years and stamp duty exemption on loans and service agreements for KLIFD-status companies, an industrial building allowance and accelerated capital allowance for KLIFD marquee-status companies and income tax exemption of 70 per cent for five years for property developers in the district.

Turning to sukuk (Islamic bond) market, which has emerged as a feather in the cap for Malaysia's Islamic finance, the Prime Minister said a tax deduction on expenses incurred for "sukuk wakala" will be given for a three-year period from 2012 to encourage more sukuk issuances.

"The income tax exemption given for non-ringgit sukuk issuance and transaction is extended for another three years until the year of assessment 2014," he said.

He also said the I-VCAP, a subsidiary of Valuecap Sdn Bhd, will provide RM200 million as seed money for shariah-compliant exchange traded funds (ETF) which will see the fund provide a matching loan subject to a maximum of RM20 million.

The prime minister also said the full exemption of import and excise duties on hybrid and electric cars given to franchise holders will be extended to end-2013.

Realising the importance of small and medium enterprises to the country's economy, Najib said a RM2 billion shariah-compliant SME Financing Fund will be established next year, which will be managed by selected Islamic banks.

The government will finance two per cent of the profit rate.

To prevent entrepreneurs succumb to failure due to economic recession and higher costs, he said the government will provide RM100 million for the SME Revitalisation Fund.

In addition, he said, the goverment will also establish a RM10 million SME Emergency Fund to help them affected by natural disasters so that they can recover and restart their businesses quickly.

Najib said the franchise fees borne by local franchisees will be allowed tax deduction in efforts to develop the local franchise industry and Malaysian brands.

He said Pulau Langkawi will be redeveloped with the Langkawi Five Year Tourism Development Master Plan to be launched with an allocation of RM420 million to be used to restructure the Langkawi Development Authority, set up a park rangers unit, upgrade museums, beaches and small businesses as well as provide a more efficient transportation system.

Hotel operators in Peninsular Malaysia investing in new four and five-star hotels will be given pioneer status with 70 per cent income tax exemption or 60 per cent investment tax allowance for five years.

In efforts not to jeopardise the ability of low-and middle-income groups to buy houses, Najib said the real property gains tax (RPGT) will be reviewed, whereby for properties held and disposed within two years, the RPGT rate is 10 per cent and five per cent for properties held for more than two years and up to five years.

"I am confident the revised RPGT rates are low and will not affect genuine property owners and will curb speculative activities," he said.

He also announced a RM100 million allocation for creativity and innovation of which RM30 million will be used to establish the Market Validation Fund to be managed by the Malaysian Technology Development Corporation together with the Malaysia Innovation Agency.

The Prime Minister said a Gross National Income of more than RM30 billion will be generated by 2020 from commercialisation of some 300 intellectual properties in the form of new products and technology from universities by the private sector.

To enable SMEs to commercialise research products, the government will establish a shariah-compliant Commercialisation Innovation Fund totalling RM500 million with an attractive profit margin.

"Effective 2012, this fund will be available at selected Islamic banks with the government financing two per cent of the profit rate", he said.

Bank Simpanan Nasional (BSN) will provide RM100 million for soft loans with four per cent interest including stamp duty exemption to encourage professionals such as lawyers, doctors and accountants to set up firms in small towns as part of the government's Rural Transformation Programme, he said.

Besides this, he said, the Rubber Industry Smallholders' Development Authority (Risda) will implement new planting and rubber replanting programmes with an allocation of RM140 million which will benefit 20,000 smallholders.

Najib also said the government will continue to implement rural infrastructure projects with an allocation of RM500 million, which will give opportunities for 29,000 Class "F" contractors.

To ease inflation and enhance the people's well-being, the Prime Minister said RM1.1 billion will be set aside next year for the development of agriculture in Terengganu, Sabah and Sarawak.

A RM300 million allocation will be provided to expand the scope of the Commercial Agriculture Fund to include innovative agriculture projects, a move which will increase the number and income of agropreneurs.

Other measures to ease rising costs and prices and lighten the people's burden include increasing the number of Kedai Rakyat 1Malaysia (KR1M) nationwide next year, offering 250 types of 1Malaysia products which are up to 40 per cent cheaper than other goods in the market.

The government plans to open 85 KR1M units next year with an allocation of RM40 million.

He said 1Malaysia People's Housing (PR1MA), the sole agency to develop and maintain affordable and quality houses, will develop several plots of government-owned land around Sungai Besi and Sungai Buloh, while identifying areas in the vicinity of mass rapid transit (MRT) and light rail transit (LRT) areas.

He said next year, 7,700 houses will be built in Cyberjaya, Putra Heights, Seremban, Damansara and Bukit Raja besides 1,880 houses built in Putrajaya and Bandar Tun Razak this year.

"The government will also provide 100 per cent stamp duty exemption on loan instruments to buy houses," he said.

He said the government will continue its noble efforts of rehabilitating abandoned housing schemes with an allocation of RM63 million to revive 1,270 abandoned houses besides RM40 million apportioned for restoration and maintenance of public and private low-cost housing.

To increase home ownership, Employees Provident Fund (EPF) withdrawals for house purchases will be extended to expatriate working in Malaysia, he said.

Permodalan Nasional Bhd together with selected financial institutions will implement Skim Amanah Rakyat 1Malaysia or SARA 1Malaysia for households with income below RM3,000 a month to increase their disposable income and encourage savings.

This is expected to benefit 100,000 households, the prime minister said.

To develop the Bumiputera community, he said, the government will allocate RM200 million for the development of Bumiputera entrepreneurs and contractors to the Rural and Regional Development Ministry.

Najib said the government will set aside RM10 million for training programmes to encourage female professionals to return to work.

He also said RM2.1 billion will be made available for micro financing to entrepreneurs, particularly women, and of this, RM100 million each will be provided for Malaysian Indian and Chinese entrepreneurs through a special unit under Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM).

The government has also established MyCreative Venture Capital with an initial RM200 million fund to encourage creative ideas among Malaysians.

"We need to ask, with the stringent financial structure, will the ideas of people like Bill Gates, the late Steve Jobs, Michael Dell, the Wright brothers, Thomas Edison, be successful.

"Ideas worth billions of ringgit may have been wasted," he said in announcing the fund which will remove constraints to financing creative ideas.

The federal government's total revenue next year is expected to increase by 1.9 per cent to RM186.9 billion from RM183.4 billion this year, while the government's deficit in 2012 is set to improve to 4.7 per cent of the gross domestic product from 5.4 per cent this year.

Friday, 7 October 2011

The great Malaysian run-around

By avoiding giving evidence for Sodomy II, Najib has only added to the speculation that he is guilty of involvement in the Saiful-Anwar probe.
COMMENT

Malaysians heaved a collective groan when the Kuala Lumpur High Court threw out the subpoenas served on Prime Ninister Najib Tun Razak and the self-styled “First Lady”, Rosmah Mansor, to testify at Anwar Ibrahim’s Sodomy II trial.

In scenes reminiscent of Sodomy I, Najib will be the second prime minister who has avoided taking the witness stand. The first was Dr Mahathir Mohamad who avoided giving testimony in Anwar’s 1998 trial.

The difference between the two trials is that in Sodomy II, both Najib and Rosmah had been placed on the prosecution witness list, unlike Mahathir in Sodomy I.

The degree of confusion that Malaysians have been subjected to by the trial judge, and the level of mistrust and loss of faith that Malaysians have for its public institutions is unparalleled.

One’s “periuk nasi” is a powerful and motivating factor. For some, integrity, self-respect, belief in the rule of law and equality for all, mean nothing. It is worse when those who have been placed in positions of trust are amoral, such as our judges.

Questions abound. Why were subpoenas issued in the first instance? Why does the judge now claim that the testimonies of this couple are irrelevant because they are not “material witnesses” in the trial?

These questions seem inconsequential when compared with the question of why this sham trial was allowed to proceed and why incompetent chemists were allowed to give evidence.

Anwar’s lawyer, Karpal Singh, said, “The trial judge did not even give reasons for his ruling, especially since he reserved his judgment for days.”

Perhaps when Najib said that he wanted to create “the best democracy in the world”, he meant it, but only for himself and his inner circle.

He and his cronies will be above the law. They need not testify or be made to account for their actions. Uppermost in their minds is the need to suppress evidence which may help others.

Any judgment will invariably be in their favour. Any judgment which goes against them, will ultimately be over-turned. We also learn that judges in the Malaysian judiciary are allowed to get away with plagiarism.

So whilst ordinary Malaysians are ruled by law, and are not at liberty to ignore a subpoena or a summons to appear in court, the Umnoputras are free to roam around like “binatang2 liar”.

The Apco link

That is what it means to live in the fast lane of the Umnoputra elite. Even those who give them patronage also benefit. Responsibility and accountability mean nothing. The rakyat are too meek to act. The paralytic state of our minds and actions are what Umno-BN thrives on.

In December 2010, Najib went all out to prevent Anwar presenting his evidence which would have exposed his close ties with Apco, a US-based firm with strong links to Israel.

Anwar said, “We have all the files, the documents and were ready to face any of their questions. But instead of giving me the chance to defend myself, the BN parliamentarians said they had enough ‘evidence’ to decide whether or not to suspend me.”

In a move which took Anwar and his lawyers by surprise, the Najib administration sprung a surprise in Parliament and authorised the Rights and Privileges Committee, to cancel Anwar’s defence.

They then solely relied on a letter from Apco and barred other witnesses from testifying that “1Malaysia” had been cooked up by Apco.

In the ensuing fracas, Anwar and three of his fellow parliamentarians who came to his defence, were slapped with six-month suspensions from Parliament.

Najib might believe he has escaped censure but the court of public opinion thinks differently. By avoiding giving evidence for Sodomy II, Najib can only have added to the speculation that he is guilty of involvement in the Saiful-Anwar probe.

Najib should note that former British premier Tony Blair was asked to appear at an inquest into the Iraq war while ex-president Bill Clinton had to deal with the Starr investigation, the Paula Jones lawsuit and then the ignominious Clinton-Lewinsky affair.

Both these heads of state came out untarnished. In fact, some claim that their popularities, which had been on the wane, improved after their performances during the court hearings.

Najib may think he has the last word in Malaysian affairs and Malaysia’s lop-sided justice. But will he fare just as well when the Scorpene trials take place in France? France can at least claim to be a country governed by the rule of law.

There are several routes Najib may take if he is served with a subpoena in a French court. He may choose to ignore it and he may be tried in absentia. He might even be found guilty and be issued with an international arrest warrant.

Quest for justice

Perhaps, Najib will take comfort in that President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe is still running free in the world and although he is not welcome in Europe, he is a regular visitor to Malaysia and is alleged to be Mahathir’s good friend.

Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir is another who has managed to evade capture, despite an international arrest warrant on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

Thus, the allegations of Rosmah’s intricate dealings in the Middle East might suddenly find credence. After the Jasmine revolution, Leila, the opulent wife of Tunisia’s ex-president Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, is known to be living a life of luxury, in exile in Saudi Arabia and Dubai.

Now is the time when Malaysians have to stand united and demand that our fight against injustice continues.

We need courage and determination as well as patience to overcome all the obstacles in our way.

A crooked judiciary is something that we can dispense with after the next general election. Will those who triumph guarantee us that?

The quest for justice is not just for Anwar but also for the others who are not among the great and good.

These are the ordinary people, including the marginalised, who have died at the hands of the police, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) or just disappeared under unexplained circumstances.

Mariam Mokhtar is a local political commentator and a FMT columnist.

Appeals Court to decide today on housewife's RM4.1m award

The Sun
by Tan Yi Liang


PUTRAJAYA (Oct 6, 2011): The Court of Appeal will decide tomorrow on an appeal by the A-G’s Chambers against a High Court decision awarding a housewife RM 4.1 million for her husband’s death 11 years ago.

Justice Datuk Seri Abu Samah Nordin, who sat with Justices Datuk Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus and Datuk Aziah Ali , fixed the date after hearing submissions on the appeal filed against the award given to Suzana Md Aris for her husband’s death in police custody on Aug 19, 1999.

A post mortem found that her husband Mohd Anuar Sharip, 31, in all probability, died of bronchopneumonia.

Suzana filed a suit in 2000 against Gombak police chief DSP Ishak Hussain, district CID chief ACP Massari Hashim, then Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Norian Mai and the government.

In October 2009, then-High Court Justice Datuk Kang Hwee Gee ruled that the police were negligent and failed to take reasonable care of Mohd Anuar while he was in their custody.

Girl, eight, sold to Afghan police officer as his bride

Child bride
Innocence: A three-year-old Afghan girl at her engagement to a cousin aged seven. The law should prohibit child marriages 

Girls are still sold as child brides in Afghanistan, despite laws banning the practice.

Ten years after British forces entered the war-ravaged country, the Standard has uncovered shocking evidence of an eight-year-old girl who was married off to a policeman for cash. She was sold to the officer, in his twenties, in clear breach of laws introduced two years ago to protect women.

She was then the subject of a remarkable battle that symbolises the plight of girls in Afghanistan. Her story vividly highlights the failure to bring about social reforms in the stricken nation, despite the long presence of British forces.

It is revealed ahead of tomorrow's 10th anniversary of the first air strikes on Afghanistan and is a grim reminder of how once-high hopes for democracy, modern justice and social progress there have been dashed.

It also comes a day after David Cameron renewed his promise to withdraw combat troops by the end of 2014. The Standard has been told disturbing details of the case by British advisers who are concerned that the girl is still in danger. They are angry that they are powerless to act.

The child was sold to a member of the Afghan border police, a state employee, within the past year by her father in the southern Helmand district of Garmsir. A price was agreed with the father and the marriage was duly solemnised in a ceremony with a mullah.

This was against Afghan state law on marriage but the ceremony gave legitimacy and status in the eyes of the communities and the families.

It was agreed in the deal that the groom would not have sex with the bride until she had passed puberty. Under current law, the legal lower age for marriage is 16.

After a few months, the father returned to the bridegroom's family to complain. In breach of the contract, the husband had attempted sex with the child bride.


This was referred, with the help of international advisers and counsellors, to the legal authorities.
The public prosecutor and the Haquq, the local arbitrator and a key figure in community justice in Afghanistan, were requested to consider a prosecution against the abusive husband.

"The child was taken into custody," said my source, a governance adviser from the international community.

"She was examined by a US Marine doctor and was found to have been interfered with." At this point, the authorities decided this was a matter not for the law of Afghanistan but community and tribal custom.

The village elders decided that the husband had breached the agreement and so should pay the bigger bride price demanded by the father. They also ruled the child should return to her husband, whatever the risk to her health, happiness and even life.

In Afghanistan, despite the law against child brides, more than half of all girls are married before they turn 15, usually to settle disputes. On my recent visit of just under a month across Afghanistan - the third this year alone - I found that the trading of young girls as brides is far from rare.

"Bride prices" are up to $20,000 and the big payers are those rich in opium, gangsters, middlemen and warlords.

After the case of a three-year-old girl who was being prepared for marriage in October 2007, Afghan officials promised to crack down on the practice.

Tiny Sunam was pictured in a bridal veil as she was promised to her seven-year-old cousin Nieem. But the Standard has learned that such promises have not been honoured.

A Unicef study from 2000 to 2008 found that more than 43 per cent of women in Afghanistan were married under age, some before puberty.

In 2009 Human Rights Watch and Unifem, a UN agency, classified 57 per cent of all brides as under age, which is below 16. Despite the changes in the state law, not much seems to have changed since then because old tribal customs nearly always seem to trump the laws of the land - despite strenuous efforts by government and international agencies to educate tribal elders and local judicial figures, like the judge and the Haquq.

In 2009 an Elimination Of Violence Against Women law was passed. But this has only been implemented in 10 of the 34 provinces.

Now, in addition to concerns about Kabul turning a blind eye, Oxfam has issued a stark warning that if the Taliban comes back to power as part of a peace deal in Afghanistan, this could mean a catastrophic setback for the rights and fair treatment of women. Among them will be child brides.

Tomorrow is the anniversary of allied intervention to oust the Taliban regime and its al Qaeda sponsors from Kabul. But any fragile gains made by women since 2001 may now be endangered if the Taliban were to insist on their harsh interpretation of Sharia law as the condition for ceasing hostilities and entering a coalition government.

More than 380 UK soldiers have died fighting the Taliban in a bid to stop Afghanistan being a safe haven for terrorists. Al Qaeda has largely been forced out of the country and over the border into Pakistan.

British forces took part in the Allied air strikes against the Taliban on October 7. Royal Marines from 40 Commando were sent in to secure Bagram airfield, near the capital Kabul, the following month.

The first British casualty was Private Darren George, 23, of the Royal Anglian Regiment, killed in April 2002.

Anwar incapable of ‘vigorous activities’, court told

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 6 — An orthopaedic surgeon said it was impossible for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to engage in “vigorous activities” since he suffers from severe arthritis and nerve damage.

Dr Thomas Hoogland, who performed surgery on Anwar’s back in 2004 in Munich, Germany said Anwar suffered from three problems — “neck stenosis, facet joint arthritis, and nerve route damage.”

He was testifying today at the opposition leader’s Sodomy II trial.

The doctor said Anwar’s operation in 2004 left him with arthritis and that his condition had worsened between that time till 2008.

“The most increase in the problem could have been from 2004 to 2008. We are dealing with three problems — nerve damage, stenosis causing a lot of limitation in the movement of his back and the damage to the joint, causing the on-going problem, arthritis,” he told the court today.

Anwar, who has had a history of back problems, is accused of sodomising 26-year old Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

The last part of the defence’s examination session was conducted in-camera, where the public was ordered to leave the court.

Anwar’s lawyer Sankara remained tight-lipped when asked later whether the defence was trying to argue that the PKR defacto leader was physically incapable of the alleged act due to his medical condition.

“I cannot comment on that, as it is in-camera. But what we are trying to get at is that Anwar is unable to act vigorously,” Sankara said.

Dr Hoogland told the court he had even advised Anwar about how to conduct his daily prayers.

“He needs to move slowly to prevent pain. As stated earlier, he has problems bend (beyond) 10 to 15 degrees,” said the surgeon.

Anwar’s last checkup with Dr Hoogland was on September 8 this year.

The trial resumes tomorrow morning with the prosecution cross-examining the Dutch surgeon.

Still a long road ahead for Palanivel

The job of rebuilding MIC is far from over, says a veteran observer.

PETALING JAYA: MIC president G Palanivel still has much work to do to establish himself as a credible leader for Malaysian Indians, according to a veteran observer of MIC politics, Denison Jayasooria.

He said Palanivel was not a tested politician and that pundits still linked his political life to that of his former boss, S Samy Vellu.

Denison is a former director of the Social Strategic Foundation, a think-tank that MIC established in 1997 to address the social problems of Malaysian Indians.

In an interview with FMT, he said Palanivel still had a long way to go to rebuild MIC after the losses it suffered in the 2008 general election.

“Palanivel was not elected to his presidency and he doesn’t hold a parliamentary seat. This definitely has an impact on his effort to rebuild the party. However, only time will tell whether he can get a better deal for the Indian community.”

However, he added, Palanivel was fortunate that Najib Tun Razak, unlike previous prime ministers, offered an inclusive political agenda and was equally determined to win the hearts of the Indian community.

“Najib’s decision to offer a second minister’s post to the Indian community is a way to reach out to the community. While some may find this insignificant, it shows Umno’s new approach towards the Indian community.”

He described Najib’s approach to the community as “direct and persistent” and said it seemed to be paying off.

But Denison does not expect Indians to give Barisan Nasional the same level of support they gave before 2008.

“BN could probably get 65% of the Indian support at the most. The majority of the Indian middle class and professionals still distrust BN.”

Lacking vision

Commenting on the increase in the number of Indian-based political parties, Denison said this was due to the inability of “certain dominant political parties” to be inclusive in their approach.

Most of the new parties are either pro-BN or pro-Pakatan Rakyat. The exception is the Human Rights Party, which wants to serve as a third force.

“Indians are very passionate people, with each one believing he could become a leader to champion a certain cause,” Denison said.

“But what is lacking is a vision to keep the community together, as each leader with a following is trying to push his views to the national leadership,” he said.

He said that there should be strong cooperation among the different parties to address issues affecting the Indian community.

He heaped praises on Sungai Siput MP Dr Michael D Jeyakumar of Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) for going beyond racial and religious bounds in his political approach.

“He is a politician who takes a class-based approach in his struggle rather than the usual race and religion rhetoric we hear,” he said.

“In a forum recently, Jeyakumar presented his case on how political work could be done without money and power, but by mass mobilisation of people.”

Work with NGOs

Denison advised MIC to try to win the hearts of the middle class and the professionals in order to ensure its continuity.

For starters, he said, MIC should explain to Indians how the government’s Economic Transformation Plan (ETP) and its New Economic Model (NEM) would benefit the community.

“And MIC should also work with the NGOs on this.”

He commended Palanivel and his deputy, Dr S Subramaniam, for breaking BN ranks last June when they called for the release of PSM activists detained under the Emergency Ordinance.

“While Najib’s image may be battered by the detention, it was commendable for Palanivel and his deputy to have called for their release.”

He also praised MIC’s handling of the Interlok issue, saying it enhanced the party’s image as a “consistent political voice” for Malaysian Indians.

PSM, Jerit picket in 8 towns

The protest is against amendments to the Employment Act, said to be unfair to workers.

PETALING JAYA: Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) and the NGO Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas (Jerit) today held joint pickets in eight towns to protest against amendments to the Employment Act that they see as an outrage against the interest of workers.

The pickets were held in Kajang, Shah Alam, Penang, Tampoi (Johor), Senawang (Negri Sembilan) and the Perak towns of Sungai Siput, Tasek and Tanjung Malim.

The amendments free employers from having to compensate workers they retrench. They also allow a month’s delay in paying overtime.

PSM treasurer A Sivarajan, who led the picket in Shah Alam, said about 50 workers took part in the demonstration there and that they were supported by several members of PAS, DAP and PKR.

He said about 10 policemen in three patrol cars observed the picket.

In Kajang, according to Jerit coordinator S Parameswary, motorists blared their horns to show support for the picket.

He said Jerit would gather a larger group to meet Human Resources Minister Dr S Subramaniam if the government ignored opposition to the amendments and went ahead to table it in Parliament.

On Monday, the Malaysian Trade Unions Congress staged a protest against the proposed amendment outside Parliament House for about 45 minutes.

Ku Li not concerned by move to ban Undilah video

Razaleigh said he personally felt that the video was conveying a good message to the people.

KUALA LUMPUR: Gua Musang MP Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah is not concerned over the decision to remove the “Undilah”video clip from public broadcast.

“Those who want to ban the video and have the power to do so, will of course ban it,” he told reporters when met at the Parliament lobby, here.

Razaleigh is among 40 personalities featured in the public service announcement video including politicians from Barisan Nasional and opposition as well as local artistes and sports personalities.

The four minutes, 38 seconds video, produced by musician Pete Teo, was launched on Malaysia Day urging the people to register as voters.

Razaleigh said he personally felt that the video was conveying a good message to the people.
“I was asked to make a statement urging the people to register, so I came forward,” he said.

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) said the clip had not yet been approved by the Film Censorship Board, hence the decision to pull it from public broadcast.
-Bernama

Land dispute: MIC man says dissolve party if...

A branch leader says MIC should be dissolved if it does not return a plot of land claim to have been allocated for a Tamil schoool.

KLANG: MIC should be dissolved if it fails to return a plot of land purportedly allocated for a Tamil school in Damansara.

And the ultimatum came from a MIC grassroots leader himself, Taman Mujur branch chairman V Thiagarajan.

Speaking to FMT, the vexed local leader said MIC would become irrelevant to the Indian community if it continued to overlook the issue.

The Effingham Tamil school is located in Bandar Utama. The accusation about the land grab first surfaced in 2009, with former students and residents of the area claiming that the developer of Bandar Utama had set aside six acres for the school in 1999.

They claimed that the late K Sivalingam, a MIC leader and an executive councillor in the then Barisan Nasional-led Selangor state government, decided that only three acres should be given to the school and the rest to the party.

However, MIC claimed that there was an error in the description of the proprietor in the land title and that the party is the rightful owner of the three acres.

‘I have evidence’

Thiagarajan said that he has evidence that the Bandar Utama developer allocated the land to the school and not MIC.

According to a plan drafted in 1996, the district land office registered the land under the name of the primary school.

“The total size of the land is 12 acres. And the housing developer awarded six acres for both the Tamil school and a religious school respectively,” said Thiagarajan.

“However, in a new plan drafted in 2005, the plot was divided into two separate plots where three acres was for the school and another three acres for MIC,” he added.

He also asked if there was indeed an error, why did MIC take almost 10 years to rectify it?

Refusing to accept the explanation, Thiagarajan claimed that there was something fishy concerning the deal and urged MIC president G Palanivel to return the land.

“Do not turn the Effingham Tamil school issue into another Padang Jawa temple issue like in 2007, where the demolition of the temple was one of the reasons behind MIC’s heavy losses in the 2008 general election,” he warned.

FMT could not reach MIC secretary-general S Murugesan for comments.

Dr M: Maintain current system to achieve Vision 2020

The present system had proven to be the best solution for a multi-racial country like Malaysia, says the former prime minister.

SIBU: The current system of wealth and power sharing should be maintained for the country to achieve its Vision 2020 objective of becoming a developed nation, former Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad said.

The system, especially power sharing implemented by the country’s first prime minister Tunku Abdul Rahman, had proven to be the best solution for a multi-racial country like Malaysia, he said.

“We have this concept of working together of different political parties representing different races under a coalition.

“It has obviously worked very well, first under Perikatan, then the Alliance, and now the Barisan Nasional.

“They had and have won elections after elections and formed the governments at either the federal or state levels,” he said when addressing about 1,000 Sibu residents here last night.

Mahathir was here on a one-day visit at the invitation of the Bumiputera Graduate Association.

He said despite being a multi-racial and multi-religious country, Malaysia was now a country of great unity, stability and progress because of the system.

“Of course there is this bit of unhappiness as no one, not any race, not any group can hope or expect to get 100 percent of what they think is theirs by right.

“But this is the characteristic of a society that is fair and just to everyone. We are doing the right thing when almost everyone feels a little bit unhappy,” he said.

He said people should continue to realise the need for them to make some sacrifices in order to gain from something more worthwhile.

“People should not believe in making demands which cannot be met or in confrontations as this will generate tensions and fightings and this will mean the end to the great progress we have made,” he said.

On wealth sharing, he said it had been the policy for all states to share the country’s wealth.

He said the country’s wealth were in its oil and gas resources and in its oil palm, rubber and pepper industries.

“But our wealth also come from the many big businesses centred in places like Kuala Lumpur where there are very many rich people in the country. Our system is such that the richer you are, the more you are taxed,” he said.

Mahathir said proceeds from such wealth and taxes were re-distributed nationwide by the government so that small states like Perlis could finance its development and progress instead of being left out.

He said that if one were to say that one’s wealth was for his state alone, then the wealth of Kuala Lumpur should be spent only within the city.

“But this is not fair as Kuala Lumpur is the place where everyone wants to congregate because of the superior facilities in communications, travel and in doing all kinds of businesses,” he said.

Mahathir reiterated that it was because of the fairness in the re-distribution that “development is coming up everywhere in the country”.

-Bernama

Cincin RM72 juta sudah pulang?


Tidak cukup duit gaji Najib dikumpul sejak mula jadi menteri hingga sekarang untuk membelinya. Maka Najib mesti menghilangkan keraguan orang tentang cincin itu supaya tiada wang negara disalahgunakan dan tiada urusan yang tidak betul melayakkan cincin itu boleh menjadi milik isterinya.

Subky Latif, Harakah Daily

ADAPUN cincin ajaib yang diposkan kepada isteri Perdana Menteri, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor telah dipulangkan kepada yang mengirim.

Berita yang dibongkar oleh Cikgu Bard, seorang pemimpin ternama PKR betapa adanya cincin yang semahal sekitar RM72 juta dihantar kepada Rosmah secara pos dan terpaksa melalui pemeriksaan kastam itu adalah benar apabila Menteri Nazri Aziz mengesahkannya dalam Parlimen.

Menteri Nazri dalam jawapannya kepada soalan mengenainya di Parlimen memberitahu bahawa cincin itu telah dikembalikan kepada syarikat pemunyanya.

Apabila ia telah dikembalikan kepada sipengirim, bererti pernah dibawa masuk ke negara ini dan dihantar kepada Rosmah di alamatnya.

Bagaimana ia dibawah masuk telah didedahkan oleh Cikgu Bard. Bagaimana ia dipulangkan tidak pula diketahui.

Berita rasmi mengenai cincin ini hanya yang disahkan oleh menteri Nazri di Parlimen. Penjelasan menteri di Parlimen diterima sah. Anggota Parlimen tidak boleh membuat kenyataan palsu di Parlimen. Jika dibuktikan anggota Parlimen membuat kenyataan palsu di Parlimen, maka hilang kelayakannya sebagai anggota Parlimen.

Berita ia sudah dikembalikan itu boleh diterima. Tetapi penapian Rosmah betapa cincin itu dihantar kepadanya sebagai fitnah tidak dipercayai. Orang percaya cincin itu telah dihantar kepadanya dan telah diterimanya.

Jika diadakan penyiasatan telus di Jabatan Kastam, nescaya orang dapat tahu bagaimana cincin itu sampai ke Jabatan Kastam dan cara mana kastam mengendalikannya? Kastam juga tentu dapat menceritakan ke mana cincin itu dihantar selepas diperiksa kastam?

Yang menjadi misteri sekarang ialah bagaimana cincin itu boleh dihantar ke Malaysia dan kepada orang yang dikirim di alamatnya?

Adakah syarikat yang mengirimnya sekadar untuk menunjuknya saja kepada Rosmah?

Adalah tidak munasabah cincin yang semahal itu boleh dihantar begitu saja kalau tiada persetujuan atau permintaan dari orang yang dihantar?

Kalau atas tujuan untuk dipertontonkan kepada orang Malaysia dan kemudian dipulangkan balik, mengapa tidak dihantar kepada Raja Permaisuri Agong yang kedudukan baginda adalah lebih tinggi dari isteri Perdana Menteri?

Rosmah memang terkenal sebagai seorang yang lincah dan diketahui pula suka bermewah serta gemar kepada benda-benda yang mewah.

Jika cincin itu untuk tujuan pameran, tiada berita tentang pameran barang mewah termasuk cincin itu. Adalah mustahil pameran diadakan sekadar untuk menunjukkan sebentuk cincin itu saja.

Kalau untuk dipamer, tentulah tuan punya cincin itu sendiri datang kerana dia akan dapat menjawab semua pertanyaan para peminat tentang cincin itu. Adalah mustahil cincin itu dipamerkan tanpa kehadiran tuan punya bagi menjamin keselamatan cincin itu.

Agak ajaib jika cincin itu sekadar dipinjamkan kerana ia bukan benda yang murah. Apa jaminan jika cincin itu hilang?

Tiada jawapan yang dapat diterima bagi tuan punya melepaskannya kepada orang lain selain dari dijual.

Orang seperti Rosmah dipercayai tidak akan melepaskannya apabila ia sudah di tangannya. Sedaya upayanya dia akan menjadikannya hak miliknya. Setinggi mana pun harganya tidaklah penting sangat tetapi dia ada cara untuk menyelesaikannya dan dia ada cara bagaimana Perdana Menteri Najib dapat membantu mendapatkannya.

Kita tidak menyanggah penjelasan Menteri Nazri ia telah dikembalikan kerana kita menghormati kata-kata di Parlimen adalah benar dan tiada yang tidak benar.

Tetapi siapa saksi cincin itu telah beredar dari tangan Rosmah? Apa bukti ia sudah diterima semula oleh tuan punya?

Apa pun perkiraan antara kedua tuan punya dan orang yang menerima cincin adalah urusan dan transaksi kedua mereka.

Negara, kerajaan dan rakyat ada hak untuk mengetahui urusan cincin itu. Kita yakin Rosmah mahu memilikinya. Tuan punya tentu sudah diyakinkan urusan niaganya dan penyerahan cincin itu tidak mendatangkan risiko.

Tidak cukup duit gaji Najib dikumpul sejak mula jadi menteri hingga sekarang untuk membelinya. Maka Najib mesti menghilangkan keraguan orang tentang cincin itu supaya tiada wang negara disalahgunakan dan tiada urusan yang tidak betul melayakkan cincin itu boleh menjadi milik isterinya.

Sukar orang untuk mempercayai adanya urusan tentang cincin itu boleh dibawa ke sini.

Silap Rosmah ialah mengapa cincin itu tidak dipakai dan dibawa pulang sendiri? Tiada siapa tahu jika ia tidak dipos.

Jawatankuasa khas rangka akta ganti ISA

Utusan Malaysia
Oleh AZIAN AZIZ


SHAH ALAM 5 Okt. - Satu jawatankuasa khas telah ditubuhkan untuk merangka dan meneliti dua akta baru yang bakal menggantikan Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA).

Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail berkata, jawatankuasa itu dianggotai oleh beliau serta profesional undang-undang antaranya tiga bekas ketua hakim bergelar Tun dan dua peguam bela.

Beliau berkata, jawatankuasa itu akan turut merujuk kepada beberapa pakar perundangan dari luar negara yang mempunyai pengetahuan dan pengalaman mengendalikan kes-kes melibatkan keganasan antaranya Amerika Syarikat, United Kingdom dan Jepun.

Menurut beliau, mereka akan mengadakan perbincangan berterusan dengan Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia (Suhakam), agensi kerajaan terlibat dan akhirnya mendapat pandangan masyarakat sebelum akta itu dibentangkan di Parlimen.

"Saya ingin memberi jaminan bahawa dua akta baru ini yang melibatkan undang-undang jenayah dan keganasan serta subversif akan mengambil kira perimbangan di antara hak asasi dan keselamatan awam.

"Cuma, saya minta semua pihak agar memberi kami peluang untuk melakukannya (merangka akta), pelajari betul-betul dan seterusnya mengemukakan draf yang terbaik," katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian selepas menyampaikan syarahan perdana Peguam Negara bertajuk Isu Semasa Berkaitan Undang-Undang Pencegahan di Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) di sini hari ini.

Mengenai kajian semula beberapa akta antaranya Seksyen 27 Akta Polis 1967 yang membabitkan demonstrasi, katanya, pihaknya akan memastikan pindaan yang bakal diperkenalkan dalam akta itu akan difahami oleh semua pihak.

"Kita akan memastikan tiga faktor diambil kira iaitu peserta demonstrasi, pihak berkuasa dan orang yang akan mendapat kesan daripada demonstrasi yang diadakan seperti peniaga dan lain-lain," jelas beliau.

Ditanya sama ada tindakan terhadap Bekas Setiausaha Agung Parti Komunis Malaya (PKM), Chin Peng akan terhapus dengan pemansuhan Akta Buang Negeri 1959 (Akta 79), Gani menjawab:

"Bagi mereka yang dikenakan tindakan di bawah Akta Buang Negeri 1959, mereka akan dilepaskan secara serentak atau berperingkat selepas kes mereka diteliti, tetapi Chin Peng tidak pernah dikenakan tindakan di bawah akta itu. Jadi dia tidak ada kena mengena."

Gani turut menjelaskan, keputusan kerajaan memansuhkan ISA dan Akta Buang Negeri tepat pada masanya kerana ia tidak lagi relevan dengan situasi sekarang sebagaimana Ordinan Darurat 1969.