As the search and rescue mission for MH370
entered its seventh day, investigators are still looking into "all
possibilities" amid mounting frustration and threats of lawsuits from
the relatives of the passengers on board the China-bound flight.
However, Day 7 saw two fresh possibilities emerge.
The first from China, where experts suggested that the plane may have triggered a seismic event when it impacted the sea some 150km off the southern tip of Vietnam.
As for the second possibility, it lent further credence to the speculation of sabotage or hijacking.
Sources close to the investigation had told Reuters that military radar-tracking evidence suggested that the Boeing 777-200ER carrying 239 people was deliberately flown across the Malaysian peninsula towards the Andaman Islands.
US team checking satellite data
Meanwhile, Azharuddin also dismissed suggestions that other countries should lead the search operations.
He added that it is based on the protocols set by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO).
"We still categorise the incident as missing aircraft. It says in Annex 13 (of the protocol) that if the location of the missing aircraft cannot be determined, the state of registration will have to carry out the investigation to find the whereabouts of the aircraft.
"In this case, the state of registration (of the missing aircraft) is Malaysia, and we are following strictly to the protocols of ICAO," he added when asked if other nations should be allowed to take the lead.
However, Day 7 saw two fresh possibilities emerge.
The first from China, where experts suggested that the plane may have triggered a seismic event when it impacted the sea some 150km off the southern tip of Vietnam.
As for the second possibility, it lent further credence to the speculation of sabotage or hijacking.
Sources close to the investigation had told Reuters that military radar-tracking evidence suggested that the Boeing 777-200ER carrying 239 people was deliberately flown across the Malaysian peninsula towards the Andaman Islands.
US team checking satellite data
When asked on the second possibility however, acting Transport Minister
Hishammuddin Hussein said he has no information on the seismic event
and could not confirm it.
On the first possibility, Hishammuddin maintained that radar
information is still being analysed and will not be released until an
unidentified aircraft tracked on military radar is confirmed to be
MH370.
At
the press conference, questions were also raised regarding reports that
the aircraft had sent "pings" to communications satellites for hours
after it was last seen, possibly indicating that its on-board
troubleshooting systems are functional and ready to communicate.
"What the US team are doing is that they are trying their best to get
whatever sources from their satellite system to come up with
possibilities of where the aircraft should be," Department of Civil
Aviation (DCA) director-general Azharuddin Abdul Rahman replied.
The US team is comprised of experts from the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) and National Transport Safety Board (NTSB).
This could suggest that the US team were the sources of the Reuters report on the satellite "ping".
Natural progression
Azharuddin added that a team of experts from the UK Aircraft Accident Investigation Board and aircraft engine manufacturer Rolls-Royce have also arrived this evening to study the possibility of MH370 having made satellite communication.
Azharuddin added that a team of experts from the UK Aircraft Accident Investigation Board and aircraft engine manufacturer Rolls-Royce have also arrived this evening to study the possibility of MH370 having made satellite communication.
"We are now sharing information that we don’t normally share due to
national security (interests) with agencies that could assist us.
"The information we have in our hands is being shared with to these
experts and are now being digested. I hope within a couple of days that
they can come to some conclusive position on what you asked earlier,"
Hishammuddin explained.
However,
he also described the expansion of the search area into the Andaman Sea
as a "natural progression" since searching the existing search areas
did not yield any results, and the South China Sea search area have been
expanded too.
Previously, authorities and Rolls-Royce have dismissed similar claims published in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ)
that the missing jet had been flying for hours after it had gone
missing based on continued transmissions from Aircraft Communications
Addressing and Reporting System (Acars).
The report claimed that the last Acars transmission was when the aircraft had contact with air traffic controllers, but WSJ
has since amended their article to state that the transmission came
from its "satellite-communication link designed to automatically
transmit the status of on-board systems".
M'sia: We're still in charge
M'sia: We're still in charge
Meanwhile, Azharuddin also dismissed suggestions that other countries should lead the search operations.
He added that it is based on the protocols set by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO).
"We still categorise the incident as missing aircraft. It says in Annex 13 (of the protocol) that if the location of the missing aircraft cannot be determined, the state of registration will have to carry out the investigation to find the whereabouts of the aircraft.
"In this case, the state of registration (of the missing aircraft) is Malaysia, and we are following strictly to the protocols of ICAO," he added when asked if other nations should be allowed to take the lead.
The search now involves 57 ships and 48
aircraft from 13 countries, covering a vast expanse of ocean in the
Andaman Sea northwest of Peninsular Malaysia, and South China Sea to the
northeast of the peninsula.
No comments:
Post a Comment