The Star
by SHAILA KOSHY
by SHAILA KOSHY
KUALA
LUMPUR: Both the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and Chief
Justice Tun Arifin Zakaria must quickly investigate any allegation of
corruption against sitting judges, said a former Attorney-General.
“An
allegation of corruption against a sitting judge, if serious,
undermines the institution of the judiciary,” said Tan Sri Abu Talib
Othman.
“They
must act quickly – clear the sitting judge or take action against him
or her. There’s no point if the Bar Council lodges a complaint about two
High Court judges to the MACC and nothing happens.
“The
Chief Justice must be proactive,” said Abu Talib, adding that Article
125 of the Federal Constitution empowered the CJ to take action.
He
was commenting on the council’s recent complaints to the MACC of graft
in the legal system and Arifin’s strongly worded speeches during the
opening of the Legal Year on Jan 12 against corruption in the judiciary.
“The
alleged breach may be a criminal offence or a misconduct and the CJ may
ask the MACC to investigate or he may institute disciplinary
proceedings himself,” added Abu Talib.
He
said that besides providing for the removal of a judge via a tribunal,
Article 125 also allowed for the CJ to bring the judge before a Judicial
Ethics Commitee under the Judges’ Code of Ethics and impose sanctions
for a lesser breach.
The
CJ, added Abu Talib, must keep tabs on the MACC investigation so he
would know whether the breach was a corrupt act or a misconduct.
“He
must act expeditiously because he cannot allow a person who is corrupt
or guilty of misconduct to sit in judgment over others.”
On
Sept 9, 2009, The Star reported then Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi as
saying he had asked two senior judges to leave because they were
“grossly inefficient”.
Zaki
said he had taken this action because setting up a tribunal to remove
judges would be costly and time consuming and that the two judges had
agreed to leave.
No comments:
Post a Comment