Dr Lim Teck Ghee
With the general election imminent, one key question remains yet unanswered: Will the Barisan Nasional respect the outcome of the polls and ensure a peaceful transition of power?
This is the sixty four thousand dollar sensitive question –
unasked in our repressed mass media, largely unexplored by political
analysts, never-to-be-publicly wondered but lurking in the mind of many
concerned Malaysians.
One exception to the
unwritten rule of never posing such a politically incorrect question
took place in a private lunch talk organized by the Royal Selangor Club
(RSC) for its members early this year. The January 12 event featuring
Prime Minister Najib Razak as speaker had attracted an audience of more
than 200.
An RSC member (who identified
himself as the son of a former long-serving staff of Najib’s father,
the late Tun Abdul Razak Hussein) asked the following towards the end
of the talk:
“Mr Prime Minister, would you
make the transition of the government for Pakatan a smooth one if the
opposition wins the next general election?”
According
to some of those present, after some hesitation the prime minister
responded: “I do not have to answer that question” or words to that
effect; following which he abruptly left, ostensibly for another
function.
Why did the Prime Minister not respond?
The PM may have felt that he was not able to answer the question for several reasons.
One, he may have lost his wits after being completely taken off guard.
Two,
he may not be able to guarantee a peaceful transition of power despite
being personally willing to concede should the electoral outcome
favour the opposition.
Three, he himself may not be inclined to permit a peaceful transition of power.
Historical record on power transition
Most
people are aware that the BN, and earlier, the Alliance parties, have a
long, unblemished and unsurpassed record of manipulating the election
results through constitutional and other means. This is why they have
remained in power for over 50 years.
Aficionados
of the prowess of the ruling coalition in cooking the election results
are often rapturous recalling the systematic manipulation of the
electoral rolls, malapportionment and gerrymandering of constituency
boundaries, control of the media, and a long list of other unfair and
exploitative practices, including tampering with the constitution.
Even
Dr Mahathir Mohamed in 1970 before he became prime minister was moved
to write in The Malay Dilemma: “The manner, the frequency and the
trivial reasons for altering the constitution reduced this supreme law
of the nation to a useless scrap of paper”.
During
several periods of our history of state and federal elections, we have
also seen how the Alliance and BN parties have resorted to their trump
card of using dubious ‘constitutional’ means to remain in power.
PM’s public assurance needed
Several
months after that disconcerting encounter at the RSC, Najib and his
senior Barisan colleagues again have the opportunity to answer that
question and put to rest any doubts about a peaceful transition of power
and regime change.
We have seen that the
latest electoral reform initiative for fair and clean elections has
been hijacked for the purpose of scoring political points for the
incumbents ahead of the coming elections so that true electoral reform
still remains a mirage.
Although the odds are
in favour of a BN victory, it is important that the ruling coalition
provides the assurance – before Malaysians go to the polls – that if
the unthinkable happens and they are defeated, Najib and his Umno men
will respect the outcome and ensure a peaceful transition of power.
In
1971 following his assumption of power through emergency rule, Tun
Razak noted that “So long as the form [of democracy] is preserved, the
substance can be changed to suit conditions of a particular country…”
Whether
Najib could possibly tread in his father’s footsteps and we might see
history repeat itself in the imposition of some form of emergency rule
following (or even preceding) the 13th general election is one which
needs to be clarified publicly and unequivocally.
Respecting the Constitution
It
needs to be stressed that our Federal Constitution is clear on the
right of Malaysians to elect a government of their choice in a free and
fair election. Upon the dissolution of Parliament, it becomes the
fundamental, legal and constitutional duty of the caretaker prime
minister, Najib Razak, to respect and obey the supreme law of the land.
Not
providing an answer to assure the public that the supreme law of the
land will be respected may be construed as a serious constitutional
offence.
Should the reassurance not be
provided before the election takes place, Malaysians have the right to
question the moral and constitutional fitness of the serving PM and his
party.
Finally, it would be doubly
reassuring if the head of the military and the police can reinforce the
prime minister’s statement on the peaceful transition of power and
pledge that they will serve the country regardless of which political
party is at the helm.
No comments:
Post a Comment