
He recounted Razak as allegedly saying this just prior to his arrest in 2006.
Balasubramaniam, employed by Razak then, was giving a blow-by-blow account of the circumstances surrounding Altantuya's death during his first public appearance last night after fleeing the country nearly five years ago.
H
e said he was leaving the office of a lawyer identified as Puravelan, with Razak, in a lift at that time. Newspapers were already speculating then about Razak (left) being arrested soon, and the lawyer was busy preparing his client for such an eventuality.
Upon hearing this, the private investigator supposedly told Razak, "Boss, look here. What was my advice to you? Police report. You should have done the police report."
Went against advice
Balasubramaniam explained that Razak had engaged him to keep Altantuya at bay, but the private eye advised him to lodge a police report instead.
However, Razak purportedly declined to do so because "a VVIP was involved," who was later revealed to be then defence minister and now Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.
Altantuya was said to be demanding US$500,000 (RM1,550,750) and three air tickets to Mongolia from Razak at the time, supposedly as "fees" for her role in mediating the Scorpene submarine deal.
Balasubramaniam said Razak did end up being arrested on Nov 7, the day the conversation took place, just 30 minutes upon reaching his office at Bangunan Getah Asli, Kuala Lumpur after the meeting.
He was eventually charged and acquitted of allegedly abetting in Altantuya's murder, while two police Special Action Unit (UTK) officers were sentenced to death for allegedly shooting Altantuya and blasting her remains with military-grade explosives.Some 1,000 people crammed Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall's main hall last night to hear first-hand what Balasubramaniam had to say on the Mongolian's killing.
New revelations were few and far in between while Balasubramaniam often stumbled to find the right words and had to rely on a Powerpoint slide he had prepared since his return to recall some of the events.
Exposures entrance crowd
Nevertheless, the audience remained glued to their seats - or the floor if they couldn't find one - for nearly two hours until around 11.30pm as Balasubramaniam painstakingly went through the events.
This included what had transpired between him and Razak from their introduction until the arrest, the circumstances surrounding his first statutory declaration implicating Najib in the murder and a second statutory declaration made under duress to retract it, and further attempts to bribe him to slander opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.
The
audience appeared to be engaged by Balasubramaniam's version of the
events, clapping and cheering at key points of his talk or whenever a
prominent personality's name, like Najib, cropped up.They also booed at a video of Najib denying any involvement in the incident that was screened as part of the prelude to the talk.
Other speakers included Suaram secretariat member Cynthia Gabriel and cartoonist Zulkiflee SM Anwar Ulhaque, better known as Zunar.
During the talk, Balasubramaniam mentioned that he was alone with the commissioner of oaths during the second statutory declaration.
When event moderator Badrul Hisham Shaharin asked him about a lawyer supposedly involved in preparing the document, Balasubramaniam said he only knew of this through ‘hearsay' via businessperson Deepak Jaikishan, who had persuaded him to make the declaration.
"If you ask me, I don't know. I only heard the hearsay info because Deepak had already mentioned that it was Cecil Abraham (left)," he said, drawing cheers from the crowd.He said his lawyer Americk Sidhu and human rights activist Haris Ibrahim had pressured the Bar Council to look into the allegation and its president Lim Chee Wee had asked him to give a statement.
"If everything goes right, Cecil Abraham's cover will be blown," he said.
When approached by Malaysiakini last month, Cecil had refused to comment on the allegations. Malaysiakini is currently seeking Razak Baginda’s comments on the matter.

"There
are zero provisions in the manifesto to undo these 56 years of ongoing
Umno racism-cum-injustices victimising the most vulnerable community in
Malaysia, like the Indian poor.


















PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim had previously rebutted similar complaints about the manifesto by saying that its promises
Beating
drums, speaking in Mandarin on radio and wearing a red traditional
Chinese costume to convey Chinese New Year greetings, as well as
wearning the traditional Indian jippa and exhorting Indian Malaysian voters to have nambikei (trust) in him are most recent examples.
Despite
the claims by MIC, IPF and the PPP that the Indian vote is showing
strong signs of returning to the BN fold, it is increasingly clear that
the community is weary and feels let down by these parties.
Those
who I meet regularly say that they can see the dramatic change that has
been wrought by the Pakatan Rakyat-led governments in Penang and
Selangor. 
“I
met leaders of the Indian community last night in Hulu Selangor and
generally, they are very receptive as education is a major problem,
issues of marginalisation of the community and crime had been raised.
However, these issues are addressed in our national thrust in the
Pakatan Rakyat policy which is not addressed to the subgroups,” he said.
“The
premise of legitimacy of any government is to protect the security of
the country. I can understand there have been negotiations but the
authorities have been exceedingly soft on the militant activity. 
