Al-Qaeda and its regional offshoots often use jihadist Internet forums to post statements
Thursday, 7 June 2012
English medium schools and national unity
By Kantha Kumar Ramasamy, I believe readers are aware of the recent news that the government has just announced the lifting of quotas for local Malaysians in international schools with immediate effect.
Assuming that this is official, with this new development I see no reason why we should not have national-type English medium stream schools from primary right up to pre-university.
To level the playing field and provide equal access for all Malaysians, now the need for an English medium stream along with the national and vernacular streams becomes virtually mandatory.
Otherwise we would be allowing for double standards - favouring children from families that can afford, to follow a non-national curriculum in a medium other than the national language, while those who cannot afford the fees of international schools will have to enrol in either national or national-type primary schools and then enter national secondary schools with Bahasa Melayu as the medium of instruction.
I am sure many would welcome a move by the government to introduce the English medium stream, as it would further democratise education in our country.
And as pointed out by some, there can be a substantial number of children in our country whose mother tongue or first language is English.
However, doubts may be raised as to whether such a move would undermine national unity.
Well, it is a matter of perception.
I personally would prefer a single stream primary school system that would bring children of all races together under one roof as they begin their school life.
However the claim by supporters of vernacular and English streams that a common language is no guarantee for integration and unity seems to be valid.
We have in the last four decades or so used a national curriculum with Bahasa Melayu in national primary and secondary schools as the medium of instruction.
Our expectation was, with a common language students from different ethnic and religious backgrounds would integrate and become more united in their outlook and develop a sense of togetherness.
If we are to be sincere and open in our assessment of the outcome, we have to admit that we have fallen far short of our expectations.
Racial polarisation among our students and even among teachers have become the norm and this is reflected in many aspects of school life and the extension of this polarisation becomes even more pronounced in our tertiary institutions of learning.
Gone are the days when in school hostels and university residential colleges students of different races and religions were roomed together.
Today it has become official policy of certain universities and schools to place their hostel students according to race and religion.
It is of no use for us to be in a denial mode.
This is the reality of Malaysian life today, albeit with a few rare exceptions.
So, it is obvious that having a common medium of instruction is no real guarantee that integration and togetherness would be fostered.
There are many other forces that act on students from within and without the school.
For one, attitudes of school leadership and teachers towards students of different races and religions will certainly affect the school culture.
Are all students from different social class, race or religion made to feel accepted?
Are school policies implemented to favour all regardless of class, ethnicity and religion? Do clubs and societies and other co-curriculum activities emphasise and reinforce racial integration and values of cooperation, respect and sense of togetherness?
Of course I am not saying that marginalisation and favouritism along race and religious lines are being done blatantly.
Rather it could occur in very subtle but yet powerful ways in both national and national-type schools.
And of course, schools are not immune to influences from the outside.
Therefore, regardless of the language medium in schools, there are other more important factors which can undermine national unity and national integration in schools.
And indeed it would be interesting to see how the demography and culture of our schools change if an additional English medium stream is introduced.
There are those who have the unfounded fear that introducing the English medium stream would threaten the status and mastery of the national language and the other vernacular languages.
However a policy that upholds the status of Bahasa Melayu as the national language by making it a compulsory credit in all major exams, and at the same time adopting a vigorous policy of encouraging students to become trilingual ( by ensuring that all schools have sufficient number of well-trained teachers of Mandarin, Tamil and another indigenous language) by the time they finish their schooling years, would be a boon to the educational system and the nation's cohesion and solidarity.
Vehicle of national unity and integration
If we really want our school system to become a vehicle for national unity and national integration, it is essential that:
- Our schools and school culture reflect more and more our national characteristics centred around the principles of the Rukun Negara rather than that of any particular race, culture or religion.
- Principals and teachers are inducted into the school system with an elevated consciousness of their role in promoting unity in diversity and in instilling in the hearts of their charges the principle of the oneness of mankind.
- The teacher institutes and school leadership training institutions in the country re-examine their curriculum and emphasis given to the national philosophy of education and the Rukun Negara as well as assumptions pertaining to human nature and its implications for the teaching profession.
- Both pre-service and in-service teacher training curriculum be revised to give added emphasis in integrating values across the school curriculum and using more effective pedagogy (rather than the present approach to the teaching and assessment of moral education) that will assist students to internalise and practice values such as love for humanity, safe guarding the dignity of fellow human beings, celebrating diversity, valuing justice and unity.
- School culture does not reward academic excellence alone but also reward students who have shown personal integrity, perseverance, incremental progress in their academic performance, caring dispositions, ability to work in diverse groups and involvement in cooperative endeavours.
- School policies promote and encourage clubs and societies which are multiracial and multi-religious.
- Schools allocate more time and give more emphasis to the use the fine arts such as drama, theatre and music as well as cooperative sports to nurture cross-cultural understanding, promote the spirit of oneness and develop personal self-esteem.
- Our schools while instilling a rational patriotism and love for the country, at the same time make our students become aware of their role as a global citizen of the 21st century, appreciating the interdependence of the world and the understanding that the advantage of any of its parts can best be secured through the advantage of the whole.
- We incorporate a well-planned service-learning component into the curriculum from the very beginning of secondary school so that students get to develop their latent virtues and talents through their contribution and service to their immediate community.
- We do not overload syllabus content and instead take on the ‘less is more' approach and adopt a thematic and integrated approach to curriculum design.
- We do not glorify and exaggerate the merits of ‘straight As' in examinations at the expense of the self-esteem of others who have done reasonably well.
- Let not ‘sterling exam results' be the sole measure of effective school leadership or teacher performance.
Al-Qaeda advertising for suicide bombers on internet
The advertisements ask for volunteers to get in touch via e-mail with details about their own experience and proposed targets, and were posted on a variety of jihadist forums, including Al-Fidaa, Shmoukh al-Islam and Honein.
Al-Qaeda and its regional offshoots often use jihadist Internet forums to post statements claiming responsibility for attacks, and to communicate with followers.
"The aim of this training is to continue with our brothers who are seeking to carry out operations that make for great killing and slaughtering of the enemies of Islam," said the advertisement attributed to Yemen-based Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
"It is clear now that the individual jihad, or what is called the lone wolf, has become more widespread and its features have started showing -- in summary, it is a complete jihadist operation to be carried out by a single bomber."
It said the targets of the attacks were "those who are fighting the Muslims and Islam" and specifically pointed to "economic, military and media interests of the enemy."
"Their identity must be, according to priority, American, Israeli, French and British."
Malaysia’s prime minister must be Malay Muslim, says historian
KUALA LUMPUR, June 6 — The prime minister of Malaysia must be a Malay Muslim even though there is no article in the Federal Constitution which prevents non-Malays from holding the post, because the majority of the country’s citizens are Malays, said an eminent historian today.
Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Khoo Kay Kim (picture) said everyone must accept the reality that Malays were the natives of Tanah Melayu, Malaysia’s name before independence, and that the Malays formed the majority in the country.
“Even the British recognised Malaysia as the ‘Malay States’ before it achieved independence. “From a historical perspective, the highest rulers of the land before independence were the Malay kings who were Muslims,” he said.
He was speaking to reporters after a guest appearance on the “In The Special Radar” (Dalam Radar Khas) programme titled “Democracy in Malaysia: Non-Malay Prime Minister” by Bernama Radio24 in collaboration with news portal AntaraPos.com today.
The other guests were Higher Education deputy minister Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah and Keadilan youth movement chief Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin.
The issue of a non-Malay prime minister was raised by DAP chairman Karpal Singh recently who stressed that for as long as he lives he would continue fighting to ensure a non-Malay holds the post of prime minister.
Saifuddin said the issue should never have been raised by Karpal as the opposition leader was also Malay Muslim.
“When the opposition itself chose a Malay as its leader, why bring up the issue of a non-Malay prime minister,” he said.
Shamsul Iskandar noted that Malaysia adopted a Constitutional Monarchy and parliamentary democracy with Malays having special privileges compared to the other races in the country.
He concluded that the Malays should not be worried about the veteran member of parliament’s passing remarks. — Bernama
A dare to Hisham: Don’t edit Bersih video
DAP says the Home Minister should release all 73 hours of video available to him if he truly wants the people to judge for themselves what actually happened on April 28.
KUALA LUMPUR: DAP today challenged Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein to release, unedited, all 73 hours of video footage of the April 28 Bersih rally that the police have in their possession.
Party strongman Lim Kit Siang issued the challenge in reaction to reports that the Home Ministry would release an edited clip on its website. Initial reports said the clip would be posted today, but ministry sources subsequently said the upload has been postponed to a date to be announced this afternoon.
The ministry is most likely to get its footage from the police. The panel appointed by the government to investigate violence at the rally disclosed on Monday that police were in possession of 43 video clips with a total running time of 73 hours.
“If Hishammuddin is prepared to let the public draw their own conclusions on what happened at the Bersih rally,” Lim told a press conference here, “is he prepared to upload all the 73 hours of the video clips?”
He accused the Home Minister of engaging in a “video war to support the government’s conspiracy theory” and to vilify the rally, which he described as a “great historic event”.
He said Hishammuddin’s “priority duty” as Home Minister “is not to be accuser, judge, jury and executioner all in one” but to give his full support to independent efforts to determine the truth of what happened on April 28, such as the inquiry by Suhakam.
“He should rise above it all, unless he is not interested in the truth. Looks like he has made up his mind.”
Referring to the government-appointed investigative panel, which is headed by former IGP Hanif Omar, Lim said it should be dissolved now that two of its proposed members have withdrawn. The two are former chief justice of Borneo Steve Shim Lip Kiong and Petronas corporate affairs senior general manager Medan Abdullah.
He expressed a suspicion that the Hanif panel’s “real objective” was to “produce a finding to match the government’s script”.
Lim, who is the MP for Ipoh Timur, called upon Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to provide a progress report in Parliament on Monday on Bersih’s eight demands, on the progress over the 22 recommendations made by the parliamentary select committee for electoral reform and the additional four recommendation made in the subsequent minority report.
DAP’s own video
DAP today released its own video of the April 28 events. The edited video, which lasts for about 15 minutes, starts with scenes of protesters in a festive mood, holding up banners, chanting “Bersih!” and clearing rubbish from the streets. There is also a scene of Bersih leader S Ambiga asking the crowd to disperse.
“Just as Ambiga asked the crowd to disperse, the ruling government started acting violent,” says the
voiceover above clips of police firing tear gas and water cannon into the crowd.
The video also juxtaposes statements by Najib and Hishammuddin against happenings on the ground that appear to contradict them. For example, a scene of Hishammuddin speaking in praise of police professionalism is followed by scenes of policemen beating up protestors and journalists.
The DAP video did not show images of protesters breaching the barricade around Dataran Merdeka.
Asked why this was so, DAP publicity chief Tony Pua said the that incident was subject to debate.
“We don’t know what happened,” he said. Referring to clips available on pro-BN websites, he said: “You have clips of Anwar Ibrahim and Azmin Ali instructing the crowd to breach the barrier, but anyone looking at the video can only see both using sign language. Even so, it does not justify the police using any form of violence against protesters who didn’t breach the barrier.”
KUALA LUMPUR: DAP today challenged Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein to release, unedited, all 73 hours of video footage of the April 28 Bersih rally that the police have in their possession.Party strongman Lim Kit Siang issued the challenge in reaction to reports that the Home Ministry would release an edited clip on its website. Initial reports said the clip would be posted today, but ministry sources subsequently said the upload has been postponed to a date to be announced this afternoon.
The ministry is most likely to get its footage from the police. The panel appointed by the government to investigate violence at the rally disclosed on Monday that police were in possession of 43 video clips with a total running time of 73 hours.
“If Hishammuddin is prepared to let the public draw their own conclusions on what happened at the Bersih rally,” Lim told a press conference here, “is he prepared to upload all the 73 hours of the video clips?”
He accused the Home Minister of engaging in a “video war to support the government’s conspiracy theory” and to vilify the rally, which he described as a “great historic event”.
He said Hishammuddin’s “priority duty” as Home Minister “is not to be accuser, judge, jury and executioner all in one” but to give his full support to independent efforts to determine the truth of what happened on April 28, such as the inquiry by Suhakam.
“He should rise above it all, unless he is not interested in the truth. Looks like he has made up his mind.”
Referring to the government-appointed investigative panel, which is headed by former IGP Hanif Omar, Lim said it should be dissolved now that two of its proposed members have withdrawn. The two are former chief justice of Borneo Steve Shim Lip Kiong and Petronas corporate affairs senior general manager Medan Abdullah.
He expressed a suspicion that the Hanif panel’s “real objective” was to “produce a finding to match the government’s script”.
Lim, who is the MP for Ipoh Timur, called upon Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to provide a progress report in Parliament on Monday on Bersih’s eight demands, on the progress over the 22 recommendations made by the parliamentary select committee for electoral reform and the additional four recommendation made in the subsequent minority report.
DAP’s own video
DAP today released its own video of the April 28 events. The edited video, which lasts for about 15 minutes, starts with scenes of protesters in a festive mood, holding up banners, chanting “Bersih!” and clearing rubbish from the streets. There is also a scene of Bersih leader S Ambiga asking the crowd to disperse.
“Just as Ambiga asked the crowd to disperse, the ruling government started acting violent,” says the
voiceover above clips of police firing tear gas and water cannon into the crowd.
The video also juxtaposes statements by Najib and Hishammuddin against happenings on the ground that appear to contradict them. For example, a scene of Hishammuddin speaking in praise of police professionalism is followed by scenes of policemen beating up protestors and journalists.
The DAP video did not show images of protesters breaching the barricade around Dataran Merdeka.
Asked why this was so, DAP publicity chief Tony Pua said the that incident was subject to debate.
“We don’t know what happened,” he said. Referring to clips available on pro-BN websites, he said: “You have clips of Anwar Ibrahim and Azmin Ali instructing the crowd to breach the barrier, but anyone looking at the video can only see both using sign language. Even so, it does not justify the police using any form of violence against protesters who didn’t breach the barrier.”
Indraf brothers’ assailants are PKR members
In view of this, MIC Youth is demanding an apology from deputy chief minister P Ramasamy for blaming BN.
KUALA LUMPUR: The attack on two Indian Rights Action Force (Indraf) leaders in Klang was carried out by PKR members.
MIC Youth information chief S Subramaniam confirmed that the three assailants who attacked Malaysian Indian Voice (MIV) president V Ganabathi Rao and his brother Pappa Raidu were members of the opposition party.
“This proves that Pakatan Rakyat leaders practiced ‘dirty’ politics to garner support from the Indian community in the upcoming general election,” he told FMT.
According to Subramaniam, the three men were among 200 Indians who joined PKR during the Hulu Selangor by-election in 2010.
“I was told that the fracas was because of political differences between them and had no connection with Barisan Nasional,” he said.
However, Subramaniam could not confirm from which PKR division the trio were from. “As far I know, they should be members from the Kapar or Hulu Selangor divisions,” he said.
“This is a simple example of how Pakatan leaders make baseless accusations against BN to gain votes,” he added.
Last Thursday, the brothers were attacked by the three men as they were heading towards their car after attending a funeral in Taman Mutiara, Klang.
Ganabatirao suffered injuries to his nose. He was discharged on June 1 while his brother who required surgery for a broken hand was discharged on Sunday from a private hospital in Klang.
Ramasamy must apologise
Meanwhile, Subramaniam also called on Penang Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy to apologise for blaming BN for the attack.
“Ramasamy should have checked his facts before issuing such a statement. MIC Youth will give him one week to apologise, otherwise we will call him ‘Mr Liar’,” he added.
Ramasamy, who is also DAP deputy secretary-general, had linked the assault to the Indraf 2.0 rally in Brickfields, claiming that certain quarters viewed it as a threat.
Contacted later, Ramasamy said he had mentioned that the incident was “inspired” by BN and never claimed that the attackers were from BN.
“I will not apologise. BN should apologise for failing to curb a spate of political violence,” he added.
Similarly, Ganabatirao also believed that the attackers were “instructed” by the BN leadership to carry out the attack.
He claimed that one of the three men had previously persuaded him to leave DAP and join BN.
Subramaniam also took a swipe at PKR vice-president N Surendran for claiming that MIC Youth were gangsters.
“He (Surendran) accused MIC Youth as gangsters but it seems PKR members are murderers,” he added in reference to Ganabatirao’s previous statement that two of the three men who assaulted him were arrested in connection with a murder case in Klang.
KUALA LUMPUR: The attack on two Indian Rights Action Force (Indraf) leaders in Klang was carried out by PKR members.MIC Youth information chief S Subramaniam confirmed that the three assailants who attacked Malaysian Indian Voice (MIV) president V Ganabathi Rao and his brother Pappa Raidu were members of the opposition party.
“This proves that Pakatan Rakyat leaders practiced ‘dirty’ politics to garner support from the Indian community in the upcoming general election,” he told FMT.
According to Subramaniam, the three men were among 200 Indians who joined PKR during the Hulu Selangor by-election in 2010.
“I was told that the fracas was because of political differences between them and had no connection with Barisan Nasional,” he said.
However, Subramaniam could not confirm from which PKR division the trio were from. “As far I know, they should be members from the Kapar or Hulu Selangor divisions,” he said.
“This is a simple example of how Pakatan leaders make baseless accusations against BN to gain votes,” he added.
Last Thursday, the brothers were attacked by the three men as they were heading towards their car after attending a funeral in Taman Mutiara, Klang.
Ganabatirao suffered injuries to his nose. He was discharged on June 1 while his brother who required surgery for a broken hand was discharged on Sunday from a private hospital in Klang.
Ramasamy must apologise
Meanwhile, Subramaniam also called on Penang Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy to apologise for blaming BN for the attack.
“Ramasamy should have checked his facts before issuing such a statement. MIC Youth will give him one week to apologise, otherwise we will call him ‘Mr Liar’,” he added.
Ramasamy, who is also DAP deputy secretary-general, had linked the assault to the Indraf 2.0 rally in Brickfields, claiming that certain quarters viewed it as a threat.
Contacted later, Ramasamy said he had mentioned that the incident was “inspired” by BN and never claimed that the attackers were from BN.
“I will not apologise. BN should apologise for failing to curb a spate of political violence,” he added.
Similarly, Ganabatirao also believed that the attackers were “instructed” by the BN leadership to carry out the attack.
He claimed that one of the three men had previously persuaded him to leave DAP and join BN.
Subramaniam also took a swipe at PKR vice-president N Surendran for claiming that MIC Youth were gangsters.
“He (Surendran) accused MIC Youth as gangsters but it seems PKR members are murderers,” he added in reference to Ganabatirao’s previous statement that two of the three men who assaulted him were arrested in connection with a murder case in Klang.
KDN’s Bersih video release postponed, reasons unknown
Home Ministry's release of Bersih 3.0 rally footage today is postponed but reasons for the change of plans remain unknown.
UPDATED
PETALING JAYA: The Home Ministry, originally scheduled to release today a video compilation of ‘the original footage’ of the Bersih 3.0 rally chaos, has postponed its plans.
Ministry sources said that instruction was given by the minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, earlier this morning to hold back the posting of the video on the ministry’s website.
However, no apparent reason has been given for the sudden decision.
“The minister gave an instruction this morning to postpone it, we don’t know the reasons as yet,” a source in the ministry told FMT.
On Sunday, Hishammuddin said that the video, which would show “the good, the bad, and the ugly”, would be uploaded onto the ministry’s website on Tuesday and could be viewed the next day.
“We are still compiling the visuals. The point of showing the video was to provide the people a wider perspective of what went down during the rally,” Hishammuddin reportedly said.
“The video is to show what really happened in the rally so the rakyat can make their own judgments after viewing it and not be influenced by the narrow opinions of others,” he had said.
Hishammuddin also said the ministry was ready to face the possibility of legal actions by any group after viewing the video.
Panel to view footage
However, a statement issued later today explained that the ministry was waiting for the Independent Advisory Panel headed by former inspector-general of police Hanif Omar to look through the videos first.
The statement explained that the ministry wanted panel to watch through all of the footage first.
Home Ministry secretary-general Abdul Rahim Mohd Radzi said that the panel was handed all the video recordings previously.
“The panel should be given the appropriate space and time to assessment on each of the recordings,” said Abdul Rahim.
He added that the ministry will take all the views and advise of the panel, which will hold a meeting next Monday on June 11.
UPDATED
PETALING JAYA: The Home Ministry, originally scheduled to release today a video compilation of ‘the original footage’ of the Bersih 3.0 rally chaos, has postponed its plans.Ministry sources said that instruction was given by the minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, earlier this morning to hold back the posting of the video on the ministry’s website.
However, no apparent reason has been given for the sudden decision.
“The minister gave an instruction this morning to postpone it, we don’t know the reasons as yet,” a source in the ministry told FMT.
On Sunday, Hishammuddin said that the video, which would show “the good, the bad, and the ugly”, would be uploaded onto the ministry’s website on Tuesday and could be viewed the next day.
“We are still compiling the visuals. The point of showing the video was to provide the people a wider perspective of what went down during the rally,” Hishammuddin reportedly said.
“The video is to show what really happened in the rally so the rakyat can make their own judgments after viewing it and not be influenced by the narrow opinions of others,” he had said.
Hishammuddin also said the ministry was ready to face the possibility of legal actions by any group after viewing the video.
Panel to view footage
However, a statement issued later today explained that the ministry was waiting for the Independent Advisory Panel headed by former inspector-general of police Hanif Omar to look through the videos first.
The statement explained that the ministry wanted panel to watch through all of the footage first.
Home Ministry secretary-general Abdul Rahim Mohd Radzi said that the panel was handed all the video recordings previously.
“The panel should be given the appropriate space and time to assessment on each of the recordings,” said Abdul Rahim.
He added that the ministry will take all the views and advise of the panel, which will hold a meeting next Monday on June 11.
‘Baca buku ini sebelum ia diharamkan’
ULASAN BUKU: Sebuah memoir yang membuktikan bahawa perjuangan dan demonstrasi adalah “harus” dalam keadaan tertentu.
FEATURE
Buku berbentuk memoir ini sudah saya miliki sejak 23 Februari 2012 tetapi kembali menarik perhatian apabila ada pihak tertentu tampil mengeluarkan kenyataan bahawa demonstrasi (tunjuk perasaan) dan perhimpunan dilarang dalam agama Hindu.
Memoir Bahasa Tamil bertajuk “Thalamaithuvam Or Uyirpporaatham” (2007) boleh diterjemahkan ke Bahasa Malaysia sebagai “Kepimpinan: Suatu Perjuangan Antara Hidup dan Mati” dan menyajikan pengalaman SV Lingam, seorang tokoh kaum India yang disegani tetapi kurang diberi perhatian dalam sejarah tanah air.
Buku kulit tebal dengan lebih 150 halaman ini saya sifatkan sebagai suatu bahan dokumentasi sejarah yang wajar diberi perhatian oleh semua pihak; khususnya masyarakat India-Hindu yang buat masa ini agak keliru berikutan kenyataan presiden Malaysia Hindu Dharma, Dr NS Rajendran dan presiden Hindu Sangam, RS Mohan seperti dilaporkan Bernama pada 18 Mei 2012.
Lingam pula menceritakan secara terperinci dan mendalam – berserta fakta dan dokumen rasmi sebagai sokongan – mengenai penglibatan beliau dalam pelbagai tunjuk perasaan, perhimpunan dan mogok lapar sejak tahun 1960-an.
Beliau yang menjadi ahli MIC sejak 1958, iaitu semasa berusia 16 tahun, menganjurkan mogok lapar selama empat hari pada tahun 1964 dan selama sebelas hari pada 1966. Kedua-dua mogok lapar itu adalah umpama perjuangan “ahimsa” Mahatma Gandhi serta selaras dengan hukum “dharma” yang dituntut dalam ajaran agama Hindu; iaitu demi keadilan, hak dan maruah rakyat.
Pada tahun 1969, Lingam berpindah dari Durian Tunggal, Melaka dan kembali ke tempat kelahirannya iaitu Shah Alam, Selangor. Walaupun berubah tempat tinggal, beliau tidak pernah berundur daripada memimpin sekelompok masyarakat – khasnya kaum India yang tertindas – untuk terus memperjuangkan apa yang menjadi hak mereka mengikut undang-undang.
Buku ini disertakan juga dengan foto-foto lama dan keratan akhbar yang menjelaskan tujuan dan kesan perjuangan Lingam secara bersendirian dan berkumpulan.
Walaupun catatan berupa memoir dilakukan dari sudut pandangan pengarang, beliau tidak lupa memasukkan juga sumbangan dan pandangan pelbagai pihak lain dalam perkara-perkara tertentu.
Buku ini pasti membantu rakan-rakan dan kenalan Lingam untuk mengimbau kenangan silam di mana mereka sama-sama terlibat secara langsung atau tidak langsung dalam memperjuangkan maruah dan hak pekerja ladang dan bakal guru sekolah Tamil.
Memoir “Thalamaithuvam Or Uyirpporaatham” turut memuatkan kata-kata aluan daripada Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu, Datuk G Palanivel, Tan Sri KR Somasundram, Datuk G Sankaran dan anehnya kata-kata semangat daripada presiden Hindu Sangam waktu itu, Datuk A Vaithilingam dan Rajendran sendiri yang sudah pun menjadi presiden Malaysia Hindu Dharma pada waktu itu.
Semasa meneliti halaman demi halaman buku ini, saya semakin yakin bahawa memoir ini merupakan suatu dokumen sejarah yang “terlepas” daripada pandangan umum. Namun, buku ini yang terbit pada 2007 belum terlewat untuk dipomosi dan diperkenalkan kepada kepada orang ramai.
Sekiranya buku “The Malaysian Indian Dilemma” (2009) karya Janakey Raman Manickam mendokumentasikan bahan-bahan sejarah berbentuk arkib yang sukar diperoleh, buku “Thalamaithuvam Or Uyirpporaatham” pula mengumpulkan pengalaman peribadi seorang individu yang sentiasa berjuang sejak usia remaja demi menegakkan hak, keadilan dan kebenaran.
Saya menyarankan supaya orang ramai (India-Hindu) membaca memoir ini sebelum, misalnya, Hindu Sangam dan Malaysian Hindu Dharma menggunakan kuasa yang ada untuk mengeluarkan “fatwa” mengharamkan buku ini.
Uthaya Sankar SB boleh dihubungi menerusi e-mel uthayasb@yahoo.com.my untuk maklumat lanjut mengenai buku-buku yang diulasnya.
FEATURE
Memoir Bahasa Tamil bertajuk “Thalamaithuvam Or Uyirpporaatham” (2007) boleh diterjemahkan ke Bahasa Malaysia sebagai “Kepimpinan: Suatu Perjuangan Antara Hidup dan Mati” dan menyajikan pengalaman SV Lingam, seorang tokoh kaum India yang disegani tetapi kurang diberi perhatian dalam sejarah tanah air.
Buku kulit tebal dengan lebih 150 halaman ini saya sifatkan sebagai suatu bahan dokumentasi sejarah yang wajar diberi perhatian oleh semua pihak; khususnya masyarakat India-Hindu yang buat masa ini agak keliru berikutan kenyataan presiden Malaysia Hindu Dharma, Dr NS Rajendran dan presiden Hindu Sangam, RS Mohan seperti dilaporkan Bernama pada 18 Mei 2012.
Lingam pula menceritakan secara terperinci dan mendalam – berserta fakta dan dokumen rasmi sebagai sokongan – mengenai penglibatan beliau dalam pelbagai tunjuk perasaan, perhimpunan dan mogok lapar sejak tahun 1960-an.
Beliau yang menjadi ahli MIC sejak 1958, iaitu semasa berusia 16 tahun, menganjurkan mogok lapar selama empat hari pada tahun 1964 dan selama sebelas hari pada 1966. Kedua-dua mogok lapar itu adalah umpama perjuangan “ahimsa” Mahatma Gandhi serta selaras dengan hukum “dharma” yang dituntut dalam ajaran agama Hindu; iaitu demi keadilan, hak dan maruah rakyat.
Pada tahun 1969, Lingam berpindah dari Durian Tunggal, Melaka dan kembali ke tempat kelahirannya iaitu Shah Alam, Selangor. Walaupun berubah tempat tinggal, beliau tidak pernah berundur daripada memimpin sekelompok masyarakat – khasnya kaum India yang tertindas – untuk terus memperjuangkan apa yang menjadi hak mereka mengikut undang-undang.
Buku ini disertakan juga dengan foto-foto lama dan keratan akhbar yang menjelaskan tujuan dan kesan perjuangan Lingam secara bersendirian dan berkumpulan.
Walaupun catatan berupa memoir dilakukan dari sudut pandangan pengarang, beliau tidak lupa memasukkan juga sumbangan dan pandangan pelbagai pihak lain dalam perkara-perkara tertentu.
Buku ini pasti membantu rakan-rakan dan kenalan Lingam untuk mengimbau kenangan silam di mana mereka sama-sama terlibat secara langsung atau tidak langsung dalam memperjuangkan maruah dan hak pekerja ladang dan bakal guru sekolah Tamil.
Memoir “Thalamaithuvam Or Uyirpporaatham” turut memuatkan kata-kata aluan daripada Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu, Datuk G Palanivel, Tan Sri KR Somasundram, Datuk G Sankaran dan anehnya kata-kata semangat daripada presiden Hindu Sangam waktu itu, Datuk A Vaithilingam dan Rajendran sendiri yang sudah pun menjadi presiden Malaysia Hindu Dharma pada waktu itu.
Semasa meneliti halaman demi halaman buku ini, saya semakin yakin bahawa memoir ini merupakan suatu dokumen sejarah yang “terlepas” daripada pandangan umum. Namun, buku ini yang terbit pada 2007 belum terlewat untuk dipomosi dan diperkenalkan kepada kepada orang ramai.
Sekiranya buku “The Malaysian Indian Dilemma” (2009) karya Janakey Raman Manickam mendokumentasikan bahan-bahan sejarah berbentuk arkib yang sukar diperoleh, buku “Thalamaithuvam Or Uyirpporaatham” pula mengumpulkan pengalaman peribadi seorang individu yang sentiasa berjuang sejak usia remaja demi menegakkan hak, keadilan dan kebenaran.
Saya menyarankan supaya orang ramai (India-Hindu) membaca memoir ini sebelum, misalnya, Hindu Sangam dan Malaysian Hindu Dharma menggunakan kuasa yang ada untuk mengeluarkan “fatwa” mengharamkan buku ini.
Uthaya Sankar SB boleh dihubungi menerusi e-mel uthayasb@yahoo.com.my untuk maklumat lanjut mengenai buku-buku yang diulasnya.
Guilty, unless proven otherwise
The
newly-inserted Section 114A of the Evidence Act is another example of a
law that was rushed through Parliament without much debate and
discussion, to the detriment of us all.The Government is hoping that this new law will curb postings by anonymous bloggers and commentators who are critical of the Government. Which may sound well-intentioned; I am also a target of many of these. But, at the same time, this law is more far-reaching because it makes owners of blogs, Facebook pages and Twitter accounts responsible for anything that appears on them.
Marina Mahathir, The Star
AS often happens, e-mails pop up in my inbox with interesting headlines. While I usually save them to read later, I had to open this particular e-mail immediately because it had my name in it.
To my horror, I found an article purportedly written by me being circulated to much salutary praise.
Normally, I would either ignore it or leave it to readers to judge whether I really wrote such an article.
It would be obvious, I thought, to those who have followed my columns all these years that the style in that article, the photo byline notwithstanding, was definitely very different from mine.
Indeed, the reason I was passed the article was because some people who are very familiar with my writing style had their suspicions.
But I cannot rely solely on the goodwill of my readers anymore. With the new amendment to the Evidence Act 1950 which just came into being – it won’t matter if my so-called “article” was full of grammar and spelling mistakes which I wouldn’t normally make – I would be deemed as having written it until I can prove otherwise.
The newly inserted Section 114A of the Evidence Act provides for the following:
> Owners, hosts, administrators, editors or sub-editors of websites or social media accounts are deemed responsible for any content that has been published or re-published on their site whether by themselves, persons impersonating them or any other persons;
> Subscribers of a network service which was used to publish or re-publish any content are deemed responsible for the publication; and
> Owners or individuals in custody of an electronic device that was used to publish or re-publish any content are deemed responsible for the publication.
Basically, this means that until you can prove you are innocent of these charges, you are considered by the law as guilty.
This is a complete reversal of the usual “innocent until proven guilty” axiom in most courts of law.
You can imagine the chill that went through my spine when I read this law. Over the years, not only have I been impersonated in articles and comments but also in real life.
Now all of these people will be encouraged to do more because of this law. They will know that I will have to spend so much time, energy and expense to fight to prove my innocence in the courts that they will get away pretty much scot-free.
Furthermore, while I’m trying to prove that I didn’t write these articles, they can continue to keep writing them with impunity.
Who, therefore, is this law meant to protect? And how could such a law have been passed?
Once again, this is another example of a law that was rushed through Parliament without much debate and discussion, to the detriment of us all.
More importantly, it is a huge threat to the freedom of speech that is enshrined in our Federal Constitution, a freedom already threatened by so many other laws.
The Government is hoping that this new law will curb postings by anonymous bloggers and commentators who are critical of the Government. Which may sound well-intentioned; I am also a target of many of these.
But, at the same time, this law is more far-reaching because it makes owners of blogs, Facebook pages and Twitter accounts responsible for anything that appears on them.
If someone posts an anonymous comment on my blog or Facebook page that somebody else does not like, then I’m instantly responsible for it even if I don’t know who the poster is in real life.
It can also work the other way round. Anyone can pretend to be a government official or politician and make a critical or defamatory posting on a government or political website.
Actually, there can be lots of such postings on any website and the owner, including presumably the Government, will be held responsible for them.
I’m not even sure what can be done by anyone to seek redress for that. Talk about an incentive to spam people with all sorts of nasty comments!
It makes you wonder how laws are made in this country. Already one law, the Election Offences Act, had to be retracted after it had been passed because it was found to be detrimental to all sides in an election.
Surely this was a result of not giving the law enough scrutiny and debate in Parliament. If more time had been given, then surely such faulty laws would not have been passed in such a form.
Doesn’t this also make you worry about the other laws passed in such a hurry as well? What traps lurk within them that we don’t know about, and which we could unknowingly get caught in?
Malaysia Sub Scandal Spreads to Malta
Najib: Malta? I don't remember being in Malta
Malaysia’s long-running submarine scandal appears to have widened all the way to the Mediterranean island of Malta, with an opposition Member of Parliament alleging that a French-owned, Malta-based financial consultancy is being investigated for its role in the controversial US$1 purchase of the boats by the Malaysian government.
According to the Malta-based news portal Malta Today, MP Evarist Bartolo told the Maltese parliament that the French-owned financial consultancy Gifen is being investigated by French officials over allegations that part of a €114 million commission paid to Perimekar Sdn Bhd, then wholly owned by Abdul Razak Baginda, a close associate of Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, may have been laundered through Malta. The Perimekar commission has been criticized as a subterfuge to steer kickbacks to political figures.
Other news reports from Malta alleged that Gifen was established by Jean-Marie Bouvin, who has been also heavily involved in other sales by the French state-owned company DCN of submarines to Pakistan and frigates to Taiwan. Both of those transactions have been dogged by a flock of spectacular murders.
French prosecutors were said to have discovered Gifen after they scrutinized a vast trove of documents and internal confidential reports of DCN and the French Ministry of Defense as well as interviewing DCNS officials and related companies such as Thales as well as officials in the French ministry of defense.
Other companies allegedly used for similar purposes, Bartolo said, were Eurolux, based in Luxembourg, and Technomar, based in Belgium. Bartolo further alleged that Gifen, which was founded in 2001 by Bouvin, was well-connected with the French secret services, and had close ties both with former French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Prime Minister Dominic de Villepin. After France signed the UN Convention Against Corruption, Bouvin allegedly began to operate though different channels - setting up companies in Ireland, Switzerland, Mauritius, the Isle of Man and Malta, Malta Today reported.
Sarkozy has been mentioned in connection with massive bribes promised to Pakistani generals for the purchase of SSK Scorpene submarines from Armaris, now a unit of the French defense giant DCNS. Eleven French technicians were blown up with a car bomb that was first blamed on Al Qaeda. However, subsequent stories in France, called “L’Affaire Karachi,” alleged that Pakistani generals blew up the van in retaliation for the cancellation of kickbacks by then President Jacques Chirac. Sarkozy has angrily denied any involvement in the kickback scheme. However, now that he has lost the French presidency to Francois Hollande, investigators may be taking another look at his activities.
Bartolo, the former Education Minister, said French inquiring magistrates have now ordered the police to initiate an international investigation into the companies based in France, Luxembourg and Hong Kong - including Gifen in Malta - as part of a global anti-corruption sting.
The Malaysian Ministry of Defense purchased the two SSK Scorpene submarines in 2002 from Armaris. At that point, Najib Tun Razak was defense minister and engineered the purchase.
French lawyers William Bourdon and Joseph Breham of the public service law firm Avocats a la Cour were successful in opening the DCNS books on behalf of the Malaysian human rights NGO Suaram earlier this year. In an email, Breham said he was aware of Gifen as a company but wasn’t sure if it is part of the probe he has been following.
In any case, a stream of revelations of bribes and kickbacks has flowed across the world. So far, however, they have done little damage to Najib’s popularity as he maneuvers his national ruling coalition into position for what are expected to be national elections sometime this fall. Among those allegations, according to Breham, is that Terasasi Sdn Bhd., which is owned by Razak Baginda, was paid €39 million euros for confidential documents on the ministry of defense’s specification for the submarine purchase. As Asia Sentinel has reported, the money appears to have been steered through Terasasi Hong Kong Ltd., which was established later.
According to Malta Today, Bartolo revealed that several companies worldwide currently investigated by French authorities in connection with this case and that Gifen's most active years were between 2001 and 2004, with an income of almost €1.5 million, while its registered expenses took the form of 'consultancy services' and 'travelling expenses.”
Bartolo was also quoted as adding that French investigators are currently looking into whether Gifen was used "to facilitate the movement of money involved in this contract," as well as to pay for travelling expenses for the Malaysians. According to the Opposition MP, Bouvin would pay commissions through a company called Heine in order to secure successful bids for public contracts.
Bartolo added that responsibility to regulate such operations in Malta fell to the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit and the Malta Financial Services Authority, and that the reputation of Malta as a center for financial services was at stake. He reminded the House of a report by the Council of Europe's Committee on Money Laundering, which had observed that Malta's legislation is good, but enforcement is lacking.
‘Comfortable majority’ for Pakatan in GE13, Anwar predicts
Anwar hinted at a “surprise” soon in Sabah, which he said would completely alter the political landscape. — File pic
KUALA LUMPUR, June 6 — Even as Datuk Seri Najib Razak dithers on a date for the 13th general election following reports that his Chinese and Indian support has slipped, arch-rival Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has expressed confidence of leading Pakatan Rakyat (PR) into a “comfortable” majority win in the coming polls.
The opposition leader predicted last night a minimum 10-seat margin in Parliament between the federal opposition and the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN), owing to significant inroads made in Umno’s Johor bastion as well as BN’s east Malaysian fortresses of Sabah and Sarawak.
Anwar even hinted of a coming “surprise” to be announced soon in Sabah, which he claimed would change the entire political landscape of the state, where BN presently holds 59 of 60 state seats.
“I’m absolutely certain, Insya’Allah, that we will perform much better... enough to secure a simple, comfortable majority in Putrajaya,” an optimistic Anwar told the Foreign Correspondents Club of Malaysia (FCCM) dinner talk last night.
Anwar revealed that PR’s strategy was for PKR and PAS to focus on breaking Umno’s chokehold over Malay votes, claiming that Umno has “given up” on the Chinese and Indian voters.
“Umno’s strategy is to consolidate support among the Malays... which is positive for us that they’ve given up on the ethnic Chinese, ethnic Indians, over the Malays.
“Our strategy for PKR and PAS is to focus on the Malay seats. That is why you see the prime minister’s announcements on Felda... the battle ground is still the Malay seats,” he said.
Independent pollster Merdeka Center recently found that Najib’s approval rating had seen a marked decline among Indian and Chinese voters just weeks after a tumultuous Bersih 3.0 rally.
The poll, carried out between May 10 and 18, found that 72 per cent out of Indian voters were satisfied with Najib as prime minister — an eight point drop from February this year.
It also found that Chinese support for the PM had dropped 19 points from a 56 per cent in February. Only 37 per cent from this segment polled now supported Najib.
Malay voter support for Najib, however, experienced a five-point increase, from 74 per cent in February to 79 per cent in May this year.
A total of 1,019 registered voters — 59 per cent Malay, 32 per cent Chinese and 9 per cent Indian —were polled three weeks after the April 28 Bersih rally that took place here.
Both the BN and PR have gone through great pains to shore up non-Malay voter support ahead of an expected election, which must be called before the middle of next year.
The survey findings, however, suggest that BN’s support, especially among the Indian community — traditionally pro-BN — is slipping way.
Despite Najib’s soaring Malay support, however, Anwar insisted that not all among the electorate were happy with the ruling coalition.
He claimed that even within Najib’s home ground of Pekan, there were Felda settlers unhappy with plans to list Felda Global Ventures Holdings (FGVH) on the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange, despite the promised “windfall” of RM15,000 for each family.
“Today (yesterday), R. Sivarasa (Subang MP) and another lawyer filed for 670 settlers in Pekan a suit against the decision [to list] Felda. This may not change the landscape but it shows the intense battle because these families come from those who are former Umno members and supporters themselves,” he said.
He added that many among the Malays were also angry with the racially-charged abuses against Bersih 2.0 chairman Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan, whom the opposition openly support, and DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng, who has been repeatedly labelled as anti-Malay.
This, he said, contributes to his optimism that PR could wrest Putrajaya from BN in the coming polls with a minimum 10 to 15-seat margin in the 222-seat Parliament.
In Election 2008, Anwar led the opposition to deny BN its customary two-thirds parliamentary majority by securing 82 of the 222 seats and winning in five states.
He noted that the opposition’s success in the 2008 general election was largely due to the political tsunami in the peninsula while east Malaysians had largely remained supportive of BN.
“[But] I am quite optimistic. The issue now is Sabah and Sarawak. We had popular support (in 2008) in terms of votes here in the peninsula but we lost miserably in Sabah and Sarawak.
“But for the last four years, we have tried so hard and we have capable leaders now. And now in Sarawak, if you go to any longhouse, the Ibans.... they speak of (anti-BN station) Radio Free Sarawak.
“You are also in for some surprises in Sabah... I think very soon you will hear... and this would change the political landscape. We are certainly making inroads and we are able to win more seats... enough to have a simple majority,” he said.
Anwar later described Najib’s leadership as “weak”, accusing the prime minister of being too “scared” of former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, whose statements have been hitting media headlines of late.
Among others, Dr Mahathir had recently said that BN was still weak, owing to the former premiership of Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, even adding that the pact should delay the polls to recapture some of its lost support from the Chinese and Indian communities.
Anwar said Dr Mahathir only wields a “small influence”, but due to Najib’s “weak leadership”, “outfits” linked to the former prime minister like Malay right wing group Perkasa have been allowed to spread their influence among the Malay electorate.
“But do not underestimate...,” Anwar warned BN. “I do not believe the Malays support such abuses against Ambiga and Guan Eng. I don’t think so.”
Anwar also dismissed calls on PR to reveal its shadow Cabinet before the next polls, saying this was not an oft-practised system in Malaysia.
He pointed out that within PR, there exists three-member “shadow committees” tasked to take on a variety of specialised issues.
“It is difficult for us to name (the shadow Cabinet) because we do not know which party gets what and how many seats.
“The representation in Cabinet will be reflective of our performance in the election,” he explained.
Anwar also revealed that PR would prepare a paper next week on the pact’s economic policies focusing on how to dismantle the Mahathir administration’s New Economic Policy (NEP), which he claimed would focus on needs-based affirmative action.
Home ministry withholds its Bersih 3.0 clip
The home ministry has confirmed that it is withholding its video clip
on the Bersih 3.0 rally violence, a move which have initially drew
scorn from civil society.
In a press release today, the ministry said the video will not be released until after the ministry appointed panel investigate all the footages which they have been furnished with.
"The independent panel should be given adequate space and time to assess each video," read the statement.
In addition, the ministry said it would acknowledge all views and advice from the panel, which will meet on Monday.
Previously, there were concerns that the ministry's video would be a conflict of interest because the ministry had commissioned a panel - led by former police chief Hanif Omar - to probe alleged police violence during the rally.
Earlier, Chinese dailies reported that Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein had instructed his officers to withhold the video clip, which was slated for release on the ministry's website today.
Video based on 'facts'
Last Sunday, Hishammuddin said the purpose of making the video public was to enable people to get a proper perspective on events that occurred during the rally.
“With the video recording, the people can make their own judgment based on facts and not other considerations,” he said.
He also said the ministry is ready to face civil suits from those dissatisfied with the source of the video recording.
“This is part of our responsibility to give justice to the participants, police personnel and media people who were assaulted during the rally.”
He added that there is no reason for the ministry to hide the truth as shown by the video recording to be uploaded.
To counter the ministry’s video, the DAP today uploaded a 15-minute video on the rally that focuses on police brutality.
DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang has slammed Hishammuddin’s insistence on publishing the ministry’s video which he said is nothing more than a continuation of the vilification and demonisation campaign launched by the BN government against Bersih 3.0 and Pakatan Rakyat.
In a press release today, the ministry said the video will not be released until after the ministry appointed panel investigate all the footages which they have been furnished with.
"The independent panel should be given adequate space and time to assess each video," read the statement.
In addition, the ministry said it would acknowledge all views and advice from the panel, which will meet on Monday. Previously, there were concerns that the ministry's video would be a conflict of interest because the ministry had commissioned a panel - led by former police chief Hanif Omar - to probe alleged police violence during the rally.
Earlier, Chinese dailies reported that Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein had instructed his officers to withhold the video clip, which was slated for release on the ministry's website today.
Video based on 'facts'
Last Sunday, Hishammuddin said the purpose of making the video public was to enable people to get a proper perspective on events that occurred during the rally.
“With the video recording, the people can make their own judgment based on facts and not other considerations,” he said.
He also said the ministry is ready to face civil suits from those dissatisfied with the source of the video recording. “This is part of our responsibility to give justice to the participants, police personnel and media people who were assaulted during the rally.”
He added that there is no reason for the ministry to hide the truth as shown by the video recording to be uploaded.
To counter the ministry’s video, the DAP today uploaded a 15-minute video on the rally that focuses on police brutality.
DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang has slammed Hishammuddin’s insistence on publishing the ministry’s video which he said is nothing more than a continuation of the vilification and demonisation campaign launched by the BN government against Bersih 3.0 and Pakatan Rakyat.
Bar to file defence by June 14 over lawyer’s suit on EGM
The Star
KUALA
LUMPUR: The Malaysian Bar has been directed to file its defence by June
14 in a suit over the legality of its notice issued for the
extraordinary general meeting on May 4.
Lawyer
Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz in his suit wants the notice dated May 4 to
call for the EGM declared null and void as it was not in accordance with
the Legal Profession Act 1976.
High Court Judge Justice John Louis O’Hara fixed June 13 for the next case management.
Justice
O’Hara made the order in chambers yesterday after meeting counsel Tan
Sri Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman and Shaharudin Ali who acted for Khairul and
Idza Hajar Ahmad Idzam for the four defendants.
Shaharudin said they needed to respond to the defence by June 21.
He
also said the three defendants – Bar Council, Bar Council president Lim
Chee Wee and Bar Council secretary Tony Woon Yeow Thong – were planning
to strike out the suit.
In his suit filed on May 17, Khairul had named the Bar Council, Malaysian Bar, Lim and Woon as defendants.
Khairul
claimed that at about 1.05pm on May 4, Woon had uploaded a circular on
the Malaysian Bar website stating that an EGM would be held at a hotel
here at 3pm on May 11.
He
said Woon uploaded the circular titled “Motion in relation to the
events of and surrounding the Bersih 3.0 public assembly on April 28 and
matters in connection therewith”, proposed by Lim, on behalf of the Bar
Council this year at about 11.29pm on May 4.
He
said the defendants failed, refused or neglected the statutory rights
of the Bar’s 14,189 members by not mailing the notice and motion to
them.
He
also alleged that the notice calling for the EGM was issued less than
seven days before May 11, adding that members were also not properly
notified.
Political Parties Will Be Allowed To Promote Manifestos On RTM - Rais
KUALA LUMPUR, June 6 (Bernama) -- Political parties will now be allowed
to promote their election manifestos through Radio Televisyen Malaysia
(RTM), said Information, Communications and Culture Minister Datuk Seri
Dr Rais Yatim.
He said the decision on this was taken after a Cabinet paper relating to requests by political parties for equal airtime to promote their respective manifestos, received the nod of ministers.
"As the arguments were based on Article 10 of the Federal Constitution pertaining to rights and freedom of speech, the cabinet paper was accepted.
"...Pursuant to this, when the Dewan Rakyat is dissolved and the Election Commission announces the campaigning period, political parties will be allowed to promote their manifestos through RTM or other broadcasters during the campaign period," he said when opening Wisma Berita RTM and launching RTM's news portal and digital archives at Angkasapuri here Wednesday.
He, however, did not state how much air time would be given or the conditions to be met in order for the political parties to be given the facility. Rais said what was decided for now was that the parties would be given limited time to explain their manifestos on a selected RTM channel.
He said in providing the facility, RTM would make it incumbent that they adhere to set conditions which could follow what was practised in Commonwealth and advanced countries or tailored to RTM's needs.
"For example in England, BBC gives 10 to 15 minutes for parties to promote their election manifestos subject to certain internal conditions. It is the same with Singapore and Thailand and the latest, Myanmar, with conditions acceptable to all the parties.
"Obviously, with this decision, various questions will arise and views will be forwarded. Nevertheless, the government will keep an open mind but the bottomline is that the facility has to be structured and based on the concept of broadcasting for the nation," he said.
Rais, however, stressed that as a government broadcaster, RTM had to give priority to broadcasts related to the government and matters of importance to the people.
He said the decision on this was taken after a Cabinet paper relating to requests by political parties for equal airtime to promote their respective manifestos, received the nod of ministers.
"As the arguments were based on Article 10 of the Federal Constitution pertaining to rights and freedom of speech, the cabinet paper was accepted.
"...Pursuant to this, when the Dewan Rakyat is dissolved and the Election Commission announces the campaigning period, political parties will be allowed to promote their manifestos through RTM or other broadcasters during the campaign period," he said when opening Wisma Berita RTM and launching RTM's news portal and digital archives at Angkasapuri here Wednesday.
He, however, did not state how much air time would be given or the conditions to be met in order for the political parties to be given the facility. Rais said what was decided for now was that the parties would be given limited time to explain their manifestos on a selected RTM channel.
He said in providing the facility, RTM would make it incumbent that they adhere to set conditions which could follow what was practised in Commonwealth and advanced countries or tailored to RTM's needs.
"For example in England, BBC gives 10 to 15 minutes for parties to promote their election manifestos subject to certain internal conditions. It is the same with Singapore and Thailand and the latest, Myanmar, with conditions acceptable to all the parties.
"Obviously, with this decision, various questions will arise and views will be forwarded. Nevertheless, the government will keep an open mind but the bottomline is that the facility has to be structured and based on the concept of broadcasting for the nation," he said.
Rais, however, stressed that as a government broadcaster, RTM had to give priority to broadcasts related to the government and matters of importance to the people.
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
'Navy secrets sale': Lodge report, Suaram told
If human rights group Suaram has proof that Malaysian navy secrets have
been sold to a foreign company, then it should lodge a police report to
enable investigations.
Ibrahim Ali (centre in photo), who heads Malay rights pressure group Perkasa, said Suaram should also produce a copy of the document involved.
Suaram had on May 31 revealed that a French inquiry into Paris-based shipbuilder DCNS found that it had paid Euro 36 million (RM142 million) to Terasasi (Hong Kong) Sdn Bhd as part of the purchase of two Scorpene-class submarines by Malaysia.
Part of the payment, the NGO has claimed, was for the sale of a classified document of the Malaysian navy's evaluation of the purchase order.
Ibrahim said that, while the government cannot compromise if there are indeed elements of corruption, the public should be wary of allegations made by foreigners.
"This information coming out of France and the west, we need to be cautious, sometimes they like to spin things," he told a press conference in Kuala Lumpur today.
On June 2, PKR had lodged a report against premier Najib Abdul Razak, challenging the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to investigate the claim.
'Political gimmick'
On a separate matter, Ibrahim, who is Pasir Mas MP, urged the people of Kelantan not to heed the call by Menteri Besar Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat for donations to build the Kota Bharu-Kuala Krai highway.
"The highway will cost RM1.8 billion. You can keep donating and even in 50 years the highway will not be completed,” said Ibrahim.
"It is under the jurisdiction of the federal government but they would face delays problems in acquiring land for the highway, especially if the state government is creating trouble.”
He also said the donation-funded highway
dubbed the 'People's Highway' is in fact an election gimmick by the
PAS-led state government to sow discontent against the federal
government.
"After 23 years of rule, several issues are cropping up such as slow economic growth, unemployment, locals leaving the state, inability to provide clean water supply ...
“PAS is trying to cover up (all these weaknesses) by trying to create sympathy among the people, hoping that the locals will vote (for) them in the next general election.”
It would be best if the money is donated to mosques or orphanages, he added.
Ibrahim Ali (centre in photo), who heads Malay rights pressure group Perkasa, said Suaram should also produce a copy of the document involved.Suaram had on May 31 revealed that a French inquiry into Paris-based shipbuilder DCNS found that it had paid Euro 36 million (RM142 million) to Terasasi (Hong Kong) Sdn Bhd as part of the purchase of two Scorpene-class submarines by Malaysia.
Part of the payment, the NGO has claimed, was for the sale of a classified document of the Malaysian navy's evaluation of the purchase order.
Ibrahim said that, while the government cannot compromise if there are indeed elements of corruption, the public should be wary of allegations made by foreigners.
"This information coming out of France and the west, we need to be cautious, sometimes they like to spin things," he told a press conference in Kuala Lumpur today.
On June 2, PKR had lodged a report against premier Najib Abdul Razak, challenging the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to investigate the claim.
'Political gimmick'
On a separate matter, Ibrahim, who is Pasir Mas MP, urged the people of Kelantan not to heed the call by Menteri Besar Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat for donations to build the Kota Bharu-Kuala Krai highway.
"The highway will cost RM1.8 billion. You can keep donating and even in 50 years the highway will not be completed,” said Ibrahim.
"It is under the jurisdiction of the federal government but they would face delays problems in acquiring land for the highway, especially if the state government is creating trouble.”
He also said the donation-funded highway
dubbed the 'People's Highway' is in fact an election gimmick by the
PAS-led state government to sow discontent against the federal
government."After 23 years of rule, several issues are cropping up such as slow economic growth, unemployment, locals leaving the state, inability to provide clean water supply ...
“PAS is trying to cover up (all these weaknesses) by trying to create sympathy among the people, hoping that the locals will vote (for) them in the next general election.”
It would be best if the money is donated to mosques or orphanages, he added.
Sizeable Indian presence at Pakatan ceramah in Johor
Despite the fact that the size of the attendance at their ceramah has become an object of derision by their BN adversaries, Pakatan Rakyat are enthused by the reception they received on Sunday from a crowd in Ulu Tiram in Johor.
The ceramah was organised by Johor PKR and featured speakers from coalition partners DAP and PAS.
An
overflow crowd of about 2,000 people, overwhelmingly Indian Malaysians,
turned up to hear Pakatan heavies, Salahuddin Ayub of PAS and M
Kulasegaran (right) of DAP.They sat in a tented area located near a row of shophouses in a residential suburb of Ulu Tiram, a township in the parliamentary constituency of Tebrau, northeast of Johor Bahru.
The local complement of Pakatan was represented by Johor DAP chief Dr Boo Cheng Hau and Dr Mahfodz Mohamed, the PAS state chief.
PKR vice-president N Surendran was the highest ranking official of his party to speak at the ceramah, which dwelt in no small measure on the theme of stateless Indians in the country.
The biggest cheers from the crowd were reserved for Mahfodz when he expressed astonishment that some residents born in Malaysia cannot seem to get citizenship documents whereas workers born in foreign soil have obtained such documents and registered as voters.
The
crowd also expressed their solidarity for the predicament of Bersih
co-chair Ambiga Sreenevasan, the target of attacks by Perkasa and other
right-wing groups resentful of her role in the organisation of the polls
advocacy pressure group’s mass protest of April 28.Every mention of her name by the evening’s speakers drew a round of sympathetic applause from the crowd, some of whom were seen carrying banners emblazoned with her picture.
BN’s wooing of the Indians
Indians have been a mainstay of support for the BN until the 2008 general election when they deserted the ruling coalition in droves over a host of grievances ranging from the endemic poverty of uprooted plantation workers forced by estate fragmentation to seek their living in towns to the demolition of Hindu temples.
Prime Minister Najib Razak has attempted to win back lost Indian support with direct cash aid to the poor and other inducements like an additional ministry for the MIC in the federal cabinet.
These measures are trumpeted by the MIC as having had the effect of enticing Indians back to the BN fold but the turnout of Indians at opposition events such as that in Ulu Tiram tends to gainsay those projections.
Surendran (far left)
said: “The facts on the ground are more ambiguous than the claims made
by opinion surveys and the BN generally that Indians have returned to
backing the federal coalition.”He added that the attacks of Perkasa and other Malay right-wing groups on Ambiga have drawn the sympathy of Indians to her, which could translate into a choice to stay with the opposition rather than reconcile with the BN.
Ruins of Hindu Temples in Sri Lanka. Stop this Hindu-Bouddha Clash and State sponsored Terrorism in Sri Lanka.
Hindu Temple destroyed in Sri Lanka in 1983 and onwards.
Input by Kumarathasan Rasingam.
During the state sponsored ethnic cleansing /riots against the Hindu Tamils in Sri Lanka, hundreds of Hindu Temples were attacked/destroyed/damaged. A short list of Hindu Temples attacked or destroyed in 1983 by state sponsored terrorism incited by Sinhala Government.
It is hard to believe that cabinet ministers in Sri Lanka do not know what goes on in the country they govern. They get information from briefings, internal memos and all sorts of other inside sources. In addition they also have access to the numerous, public and private, reports by outsiders. For example, at the March 1998 UNCHR hearing in Geneva, Joaquin Mbomio of North-South XXI, while condemning the attack on the Dalada Maligawa, stated, “some 1,800 Hindu temples have been destroyed by Sri Lanka’s military.”
The ministers might not know the exact number of temples destroyed by their army, but surely must be aware that the number runs in the hundreds…. (Ref : Taliban and the Sinhala Buddhists).
1. Viswanatha Sivan Temple in Trincomalee
2. Krishnan Temple in Trincomalee
3. Saneeswaran Temple in Trincomalee
4. Natesar Temple in Sivayogapuram, Trincomalee
5. Sri Tillaiambala Pillaiyar Temple in Anbuvalipuram, Trincomalee
6. Chithivinayakar Temple in Sinnatoduvai, Trincomalee
7. Vilankulam Pillaiyar Temple on Kandy Road, Trincomalee
8. Vyrutru Pillaiyar Temple on Kandy Road, Trincomalee
9. Pillaiyar Temple in China Bay, Trincomalee
10. Upparu Pillaiyar Temple in Trincomalee
11. Kitulootra Pallaiyar Temple in Kanniyai, Trincomalee
12. Kitulootra Murugan Temple in Trincomalee
13. Barathipuram Pillaiyar Temple in Pankulam, Trincomalee
14. Pillaiyar Temple in Pankulam, Trincomalee
15. Mudalikulam Pillaiyar Temple in Pankulam, Trincomalee
16. Ellai Kali Kovil in Pankulam, Trincomalee
17. Pillaiyar Temple in Panmadawachchi, Trincomalee
18. Papanasa Teertapillaiyar Temple in Trincomalee
19. Sri Pathini Amman Temple in Neelapalai, Kilivetti
20. Sri Kamakshi Ambal Temple in Jaffna
21. Saiva Maha Sabha in Kurunegala
22. Udupi Sri Muthuvinayakar Temple in Matale
23. Sri Muthumari Amman Temple in Matale
24. Muthuvinayakar Temple in Matale
25. Sri Chithivinayakar Temple in Matale
26. Sri Kadiresan Temple in Matale
27. Sri Poobalakrishnar Ashram in Matale
28. Sri Ganga Vinayakar Temple in Madulkelle
29. Kurinji Kumaran Temple, Peradeniya
30. Sri Muthumariamman Temple in Nawalapitya
31. Atmajothy Nilayam in Nawalapitiya
32. Athivinayakar Temple in Haldumulla, Haputale
33. Sri Sivasubramanya Temple in Bandarawela
34. Sri Kadiresan Temple in Badulla
35. Hindu Temple in Malangama, Badulla
36. Hindu Temple in Narangala, Badulla
37. Kali Temple in Rockhill, Badulla
38. Sri Poobalavinayakar Temple in Peliyagoda
39. Sri Balaselvavinayakar Temple in Maradana, Colombo
40. Sri Devi Karumari Amman Temple in Maligawatte, Colombo
42. Srimath Arunachaleswara Devasthanam in Colombo
43. Ramakrishna Mission, Colombo
44. Kandasamy Temple in Panadura
45. Sri Subramanya Temple in Matara
46. Hindu Pilgrims’ Rest in Matara
**List of Damage caused to Hindu Kovils (Temples) in the North-East of the Island of Sri Lanka
Source: Face Book Posting.
Input by Kumarathasan Rasingam.
During the state sponsored ethnic cleansing /riots against the Hindu Tamils in Sri Lanka, hundreds of Hindu Temples were attacked/destroyed/damaged. A short list of Hindu Temples attacked or destroyed in 1983 by state sponsored terrorism incited by Sinhala Government.
It is hard to believe that cabinet ministers in Sri Lanka do not know what goes on in the country they govern. They get information from briefings, internal memos and all sorts of other inside sources. In addition they also have access to the numerous, public and private, reports by outsiders. For example, at the March 1998 UNCHR hearing in Geneva, Joaquin Mbomio of North-South XXI, while condemning the attack on the Dalada Maligawa, stated, “some 1,800 Hindu temples have been destroyed by Sri Lanka’s military.”
The ministers might not know the exact number of temples destroyed by their army, but surely must be aware that the number runs in the hundreds…. (Ref : Taliban and the Sinhala Buddhists).
Destroyed by Sinhala Govt. Military Force
2. Krishnan Temple in Trincomalee
3. Saneeswaran Temple in Trincomalee
4. Natesar Temple in Sivayogapuram, Trincomalee
5. Sri Tillaiambala Pillaiyar Temple in Anbuvalipuram, Trincomalee
6. Chithivinayakar Temple in Sinnatoduvai, Trincomalee
7. Vilankulam Pillaiyar Temple on Kandy Road, Trincomalee
8. Vyrutru Pillaiyar Temple on Kandy Road, Trincomalee
9. Pillaiyar Temple in China Bay, Trincomalee
10. Upparu Pillaiyar Temple in Trincomalee
11. Kitulootra Pallaiyar Temple in Kanniyai, Trincomalee
12. Kitulootra Murugan Temple in Trincomalee
13. Barathipuram Pillaiyar Temple in Pankulam, Trincomalee
14. Pillaiyar Temple in Pankulam, Trincomalee
15. Mudalikulam Pillaiyar Temple in Pankulam, Trincomalee
16. Ellai Kali Kovil in Pankulam, Trincomalee
17. Pillaiyar Temple in Panmadawachchi, Trincomalee
18. Papanasa Teertapillaiyar Temple in Trincomalee
19. Sri Pathini Amman Temple in Neelapalai, Kilivetti
20. Sri Kamakshi Ambal Temple in Jaffna
21. Saiva Maha Sabha in Kurunegala
22. Udupi Sri Muthuvinayakar Temple in Matale
23. Sri Muthumari Amman Temple in Matale
24. Muthuvinayakar Temple in Matale
25. Sri Chithivinayakar Temple in Matale
26. Sri Kadiresan Temple in Matale
27. Sri Poobalakrishnar Ashram in Matale
28. Sri Ganga Vinayakar Temple in Madulkelle
29. Kurinji Kumaran Temple, Peradeniya
30. Sri Muthumariamman Temple in Nawalapitya
31. Atmajothy Nilayam in Nawalapitiya
32. Athivinayakar Temple in Haldumulla, Haputale
33. Sri Sivasubramanya Temple in Bandarawela
34. Sri Kadiresan Temple in Badulla
35. Hindu Temple in Malangama, Badulla
36. Hindu Temple in Narangala, Badulla
37. Kali Temple in Rockhill, Badulla
38. Sri Poobalavinayakar Temple in Peliyagoda
39. Sri Balaselvavinayakar Temple in Maradana, Colombo
40. Sri Devi Karumari Amman Temple in Maligawatte, Colombo
42. Srimath Arunachaleswara Devasthanam in Colombo
43. Ramakrishna Mission, Colombo
44. Kandasamy Temple in Panadura
45. Sri Subramanya Temple in Matara
46. Hindu Pilgrims’ Rest in Matara
**List of Damage caused to Hindu Kovils (Temples) in the North-East of the Island of Sri Lanka
Source: Face Book Posting.
Imams' indoctrinating French Muslims w/ culture of racism
France: Three Jews Beaten With Hammers, Iron Bars by Islamic Youths
JUNE 3, 2012 6:03 PM
Author: Algemeiner Staff
Three yarmulke wearing Jewish youths were brutally assaulted on Saturday night by a mob of over a dozen who beat them with hammers and Iron bars. The incident took place in Villeurbanne, near Lyon in southeast France. French blogs reported that the crime was carried out by Islamic youths.
The victims were hospitalized suffering various wounds and were subsequently released according to French newspaper L’Express. Police forces have begun a manhunt in search of the suspects.
On Sunday the Interior Ministry said that they believe the assault to be motivated by antisemitism.
Minister Manuel Valls, denounced the attack in a statement calling the act “extremely serious” and “a deliberate attack against our republican model that should enable everyone, without distinction, to live freely and safely expressing his religious affiliation “.
The assault comes just months following the brutal massacre of four by an Islamic terrorist at a Jewish school in Toulouse.
In reaction to the incident, French Jewish artist Ron Agam told the Algemeiner that, “It is about time now for the French authorities to radically search for these Imams and put a stop to the brainwashing on tens of thousands of Muslim kids in France.”
“It is unacceptable that this culture of racism and antisemitism is being tolerated by a significant number of the Muslim community, this culture must stop,” he concluded.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/06/03/france-three-jews-beaten-with-hammers-iron-bars-by-islamic-youths/
JUNE 3, 2012 6:03 PM
Author: Algemeiner Staff
Three yarmulke wearing Jewish youths were brutally assaulted on Saturday night by a mob of over a dozen who beat them with hammers and Iron bars. The incident took place in Villeurbanne, near Lyon in southeast France. French blogs reported that the crime was carried out by Islamic youths.
The victims were hospitalized suffering various wounds and were subsequently released according to French newspaper L’Express. Police forces have begun a manhunt in search of the suspects.
On Sunday the Interior Ministry said that they believe the assault to be motivated by antisemitism.
Minister Manuel Valls, denounced the attack in a statement calling the act “extremely serious” and “a deliberate attack against our republican model that should enable everyone, without distinction, to live freely and safely expressing his religious affiliation “.
The assault comes just months following the brutal massacre of four by an Islamic terrorist at a Jewish school in Toulouse.
In reaction to the incident, French Jewish artist Ron Agam told the Algemeiner that, “It is about time now for the French authorities to radically search for these Imams and put a stop to the brainwashing on tens of thousands of Muslim kids in France.”
“It is unacceptable that this culture of racism and antisemitism is being tolerated by a significant number of the Muslim community, this culture must stop,” he concluded.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/06/03/france-three-jews-beaten-with-hammers-iron-bars-by-islamic-youths/
Breivik judge caught playing solitaire in court
One of the five judges in the case of Anders Behring Breivik, the mass killer on trial in Norway, has been caught on camera playing solitaire in court.In a picture published in Norwegian media, one of the three lay judges, Ernst Henning Eielsen, can be seen playing the card game on his computer.
Also on Monday, Breivik has told the court he was slighted by Muslims on several occasions during his childhood.
He carried out two deadly attacks in Norway last summer, killing 77 people.
Mr Eielsen has not denied playing a game of cards, a court spokeswoman told the AFP news agency.
“The judges are attentively following what is being said and what is being presented to the court,” Irene Ramm told AFP.
“There are different ways of staying focused,” she added.
On Monday, Breivik also recalled that when he was seven, his friend’s Turkish father wrecked his bicycle, and at the age of 15 he was slapped by a Pakistani underground driver for riding on the outside of a underground car, the Associated Press news agency reports.
Breivik admits the attacks in Oslo and on the island of Utoeya, in which 77 people died and 242 were wounded.
The trial is seeking to establish whether the 33-year-old is sane, in which case he will be sent to prison.
If not, he will be held in a psychiatric institution.
Breivik denies criminal responsibility, arguing his attacks were necessary to combat multiculturalism and prevent a “Muslim invasion” of Norway and Europe.
(BBC News)
Ambiga: No way Bersih will meet Hanif
Both Bersih and Bar Council will not even make suggestions to replace the two members who have left the government's advisory panel.
PETALING JAYA: Bersih is adamant that it will not meet with the government’s independent advisory panel until its head, former Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Hanif Omar, steps down from the panel.
The coalition for free and fair elections was responding to Hanif’s call yesterday where he said that he would like to meet the organisers to get their point of view of what transpired during the rally.
Bersih co-chairperson, S Ambiga, said that it will not meet with Hanif as they were opposed to the panel based on principle.
“We are against the panel based on principle. There is nothing personal against Hanif but he has made remarks to reflect his bias.
“Therefore to us, the panel is a non-starter,” she told FMT today.
She said that Bersih was so strongly against the panel that it will not even make suggestions to replace the two members who have stepped down.
Hanif announced yesterday that two members have quit the panel. The two were former chief justice of Borneo Steve Shim Lip Kiong who pulled out for health reasons and Petronas corporate affairs senior general manager Medan Abdullah due to work commitments.
He added that it was up to the panel’s secretariat to announce their replacements soon.
Ambiga said today that one of the basic principles of law was that justice need to be seen to be implemented.
The panel, however, falls short of the principle following Hanif’s statements against Bersih during the rally’s aftermath, she added.
Flawed panel
Hanif was appointed by the Home Ministry to lead the panel on May 9. Before his appointment, Hanif was quoted in a Bernama report linking communist elements to the gathering which demanded free and fair elections.
He reportedly said: “The tactics of using provocateurs to cause the demonstrators to clash with police and to bring children along in the hope they would get injured were tactics learnt from past pro-communist demonstrations.”
He added that based on images and photographs taken during the rally, he recognised pro-communist individuals who were involved in the 1970s demonstrations.
These comments drew brickbats from both rally organisers, Bersih and the Bar.
Ambiga, however, said that Bersih was ready to give its full cooperation to the Suhakam inquiry.
“Let them not think that Bersih is unprepared. We are prepared to speak to anyone who are not biased. Therefore we will fully participate in the Suhakam inquiry,” she added.
Suhakam, the national human rights commission, set up its own panel on May 21 to investigate abuses of human rights during the rally which turned ugly after a few protesters breached the barricade which cordoned off Dataran Merdeka.
Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee, however, reiterated that they were willing to meet with Hanif to explain its final report to him.
He, however, said the they, too, like Bersih will not be making any recommendations to replace the two panel members as they too found the panel to be flawed.
“We take the view that this panel is flawed with the membership of Hanif whose two statements disqualify him from sitting, and the lack of legal framework represents a great handicap, in comparison to the Suhakam inquiry,” he said.
PETALING JAYA: Bersih is adamant that it will not meet with the government’s independent advisory panel until its head, former Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Hanif Omar, steps down from the panel.The coalition for free and fair elections was responding to Hanif’s call yesterday where he said that he would like to meet the organisers to get their point of view of what transpired during the rally.
Bersih co-chairperson, S Ambiga, said that it will not meet with Hanif as they were opposed to the panel based on principle.
“We are against the panel based on principle. There is nothing personal against Hanif but he has made remarks to reflect his bias.
“Therefore to us, the panel is a non-starter,” she told FMT today.
She said that Bersih was so strongly against the panel that it will not even make suggestions to replace the two members who have stepped down.
Hanif announced yesterday that two members have quit the panel. The two were former chief justice of Borneo Steve Shim Lip Kiong who pulled out for health reasons and Petronas corporate affairs senior general manager Medan Abdullah due to work commitments.
He added that it was up to the panel’s secretariat to announce their replacements soon.
Ambiga said today that one of the basic principles of law was that justice need to be seen to be implemented.
The panel, however, falls short of the principle following Hanif’s statements against Bersih during the rally’s aftermath, she added.
Flawed panel
Hanif was appointed by the Home Ministry to lead the panel on May 9. Before his appointment, Hanif was quoted in a Bernama report linking communist elements to the gathering which demanded free and fair elections.
He reportedly said: “The tactics of using provocateurs to cause the demonstrators to clash with police and to bring children along in the hope they would get injured were tactics learnt from past pro-communist demonstrations.”
He added that based on images and photographs taken during the rally, he recognised pro-communist individuals who were involved in the 1970s demonstrations.
These comments drew brickbats from both rally organisers, Bersih and the Bar.
Ambiga, however, said that Bersih was ready to give its full cooperation to the Suhakam inquiry.
“Let them not think that Bersih is unprepared. We are prepared to speak to anyone who are not biased. Therefore we will fully participate in the Suhakam inquiry,” she added.
Suhakam, the national human rights commission, set up its own panel on May 21 to investigate abuses of human rights during the rally which turned ugly after a few protesters breached the barricade which cordoned off Dataran Merdeka.
Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee, however, reiterated that they were willing to meet with Hanif to explain its final report to him.
He, however, said the they, too, like Bersih will not be making any recommendations to replace the two panel members as they too found the panel to be flawed.
“We take the view that this panel is flawed with the membership of Hanif whose two statements disqualify him from sitting, and the lack of legal framework represents a great handicap, in comparison to the Suhakam inquiry,” he said.
Doubts loom over political leaders
Over the decades, the quality and ability of leaders in the Malaysian political arena have come under a cloud.
COMMENT
The greatness of a nation hinges entirely on the quality and ability of its leaders. A nation is only as good as its leaders.
While the Atlantic powers, the United States and Western Europe have long produced leaders and statesmen of world stature to move their nations forward, Malaysia too has a great leader in Tunku Abdul Rahman who spearheaded the movement to obtain independence from the ruling British colonialists.
But somehow, after wresting independence from the British, and with the premature exit of the Tunku, subsequent Malaysian prime ministers have produced mixed fortunes for the country.
The leadership qualities which the Tunku possessed could possibly be attributed to him having been greatly influenced by British traits. It is no secret that many of the Tunku’s values, convictions and principles were strong depictions of the values of the British.
But after the Tunku stepped down as prime minister, the subsequent changes and styles of leadership have brought about haphazard changes to Malaysia.
If Malaysians are now in a quandary over their future, it is a situation not without basis. In the coming 13th general election, the nation is set to witness a fierce “battle royale” between Barisan Nasional (BN) and Pakatan Rakyat.
The stage has been set for this decisive encounter but many diehard political pundits are unsure as to what the final outcome will be like.
However, what is of greater concern to Malaysians is the nature, behaviour, quality and capability of political aspirants to lead the rakyat.
Motivated by self-interest
Of late, Malaysians, no matter which side of the political divide they support, have noticed that quite a number of Malaysian politicians lack integrity and ability.
Many Malaysians now tend to agree that there is a lack of capable leaders to steer the country forward. Those politicians who are eager to lead are invariably motivated by self-interest and self-seeking ambition.
This is precisely why there are non-political figures who have emerged on the scene to help “put things right”. In past general elections, Malaysians have always endorsed politicians, but now they are beginning to lend support to the voices of leaders outside the political arena.
The Malaysian Bar, Bersih, Suaram and other NGOs and organisations are beginning to overshadow elected representatives. This is because more and more Malaysians have come to believe that corruption has destroyed the trust people placed in those holding political office.
If they do not openly state it, it is understandable. But Malaysians, irrespective of race or religion, education or social status, are now becoming more convinced that the political candidates on offer do not meet the expectations and hopes of the rakyat.
Perhaps what Malaysians want, after having been under BN rule for so many decades, are capable leaders who will do what is expected of them to move the nation forward.
The nation today finds itself in a dire predicament because it has to put up with leaders who want to do things their way. They want to place self-interests above those of the people.
Without fear or favour
Malaysians are not the only ones who have cast doubts over the political direction of the country; the international community too has openly voiced concern over the policies implemented in the country.
While Malaysian leaders might like to contend that the country is a sovereign state and will not tolerate any meddling in its domestic affairs, it pays to listen carefully to what these “meddlers” are saying.
By doing so, the leaders can put to rest any allegations levelled against them.
It is imperative that changes be made in the selection of candidates for the coming general election; otherwise, the country will become a failed state.
Malaysians should choose their leaders without fear or favour and support those who can deliver the goods. Candidates with tainted background should be removed. Only those willing to sacrifice and serve the people should command the respect and recognition of Malaysians to safeguard and strengthen the future of the nation.
Christopher Fernandez has been teaching and writing throughout Asia since 1984.
COMMENT
The greatness of a nation hinges entirely on the quality and ability of its leaders. A nation is only as good as its leaders.While the Atlantic powers, the United States and Western Europe have long produced leaders and statesmen of world stature to move their nations forward, Malaysia too has a great leader in Tunku Abdul Rahman who spearheaded the movement to obtain independence from the ruling British colonialists.
But somehow, after wresting independence from the British, and with the premature exit of the Tunku, subsequent Malaysian prime ministers have produced mixed fortunes for the country.
The leadership qualities which the Tunku possessed could possibly be attributed to him having been greatly influenced by British traits. It is no secret that many of the Tunku’s values, convictions and principles were strong depictions of the values of the British.
But after the Tunku stepped down as prime minister, the subsequent changes and styles of leadership have brought about haphazard changes to Malaysia.
If Malaysians are now in a quandary over their future, it is a situation not without basis. In the coming 13th general election, the nation is set to witness a fierce “battle royale” between Barisan Nasional (BN) and Pakatan Rakyat.
The stage has been set for this decisive encounter but many diehard political pundits are unsure as to what the final outcome will be like.
However, what is of greater concern to Malaysians is the nature, behaviour, quality and capability of political aspirants to lead the rakyat.
Motivated by self-interest
Of late, Malaysians, no matter which side of the political divide they support, have noticed that quite a number of Malaysian politicians lack integrity and ability.
Many Malaysians now tend to agree that there is a lack of capable leaders to steer the country forward. Those politicians who are eager to lead are invariably motivated by self-interest and self-seeking ambition.
This is precisely why there are non-political figures who have emerged on the scene to help “put things right”. In past general elections, Malaysians have always endorsed politicians, but now they are beginning to lend support to the voices of leaders outside the political arena.
The Malaysian Bar, Bersih, Suaram and other NGOs and organisations are beginning to overshadow elected representatives. This is because more and more Malaysians have come to believe that corruption has destroyed the trust people placed in those holding political office.
If they do not openly state it, it is understandable. But Malaysians, irrespective of race or religion, education or social status, are now becoming more convinced that the political candidates on offer do not meet the expectations and hopes of the rakyat.
Perhaps what Malaysians want, after having been under BN rule for so many decades, are capable leaders who will do what is expected of them to move the nation forward.
The nation today finds itself in a dire predicament because it has to put up with leaders who want to do things their way. They want to place self-interests above those of the people.
Without fear or favour
Malaysians are not the only ones who have cast doubts over the political direction of the country; the international community too has openly voiced concern over the policies implemented in the country.
While Malaysian leaders might like to contend that the country is a sovereign state and will not tolerate any meddling in its domestic affairs, it pays to listen carefully to what these “meddlers” are saying.
By doing so, the leaders can put to rest any allegations levelled against them.
It is imperative that changes be made in the selection of candidates for the coming general election; otherwise, the country will become a failed state.
Malaysians should choose their leaders without fear or favour and support those who can deliver the goods. Candidates with tainted background should be removed. Only those willing to sacrifice and serve the people should command the respect and recognition of Malaysians to safeguard and strengthen the future of the nation.
Christopher Fernandez has been teaching and writing throughout Asia since 1984.
Bersih 3.0: Pemimpin PKR didakwa merusuh
Timbalan Ketua PKR Cabang Rasah R Tangam mengaku tidak bersalah terhadap dakwaan tambahan iaitu merusuh.
KUALA LUMPUR: Timbalan Ketua Parti Keadilan Rakyat Cabang Rasah R. Tangam, yang didakwa sebelum ini berhubung perhimpunan Bersih 3.0, hari ini mengaku tidak bersalah di Mahkamah Sesyen terhadap pertuduhan tambahan iaitu merusuh pada perhimpunan itu, di Jalan Raja, 28 April lepas.
Peguam kanan Rajesh Kumar Gejinder Nath, 45, dan Exco Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK) Farhan Ibrahim@Alias, 29, yang juga telah didakwa sebelum ini, turut mengaku tidak bersalah atas pertuduhan sama.
Mereka didakwa bersama penyokong ‘Gabungan Pilihan Raya Bersih dan Adil (Bersih 3.0)’ yang melebihi lima orang yang masih bebas menentang perintah Majistret Zaki Asyraf Zubir dengan menggunakan kekerasan dan keganasan, semasa perhimpunan itu.
Pada 26 April lalu, Zaki Asyraf mengeluarkan perintah melarang orang awam mengadakan perhimpunan di kawasan Dataran Merdeka pada 28 April hingga 1 Mei lepas.
Tangam, 50, Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan didakwa melakukan kesalahan itu di Jalan Raja, 3 petang, 28 April lalu dan didakwa mengikut Seksyen 147 Kanun Keseksaan yang membawa hukuman penjara sehingga dua tahun atau denda atau kedua-duanya sekali jika disabitkan kesalahan.
Bulan lepas, ketiga-tiga mereka didakwa di mahkamah yang sama terhadap pertuduhan melanggar perintah Mahkamah Majistret itu.
Sementara itu, seorang lelaki hari ini turut didakwa terhadap pertuduhan tambahan iaitu menyebabkan kecederaan terhadap wartawan stesen TV Al-Hijrah, Mohd Azri Mohd Salleh, 28, di Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, pada 3.50 petang, 28 April lalu.
Tertuduh, Mohd Safuan Mamat@Nordin, 25, didakwa mengikut Seksyen 323 Kanun Keseksaan yang membawa hukuman penjara sehingga setahun atau denda sebanyak RM2,000 atau kedua-duanya jika sabit kesalahan.
Dia yang diwakili peguam Mohd Tajuddin Abd Razak sebelum ini didakwa terhadap dua pertuduhan iaitu merosakkan kenderaan milik Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) dengan menggunakan sebuah kon dan mendatangkan kecederaan kepada Konstabel Mohamad Kamil Paiman.
Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Mohamad Hanafiah Zakaria memohon kepada mahkamah agar kes Tangam, Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan dibicarakan bersama.
Hakim Mahmud Abdullah menetapkan 2 Julai ini untuk sebutan semula kes Tangam, Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan dan menetapkan 4 hingga 7 Sept tarikh bicara bagi kes Mohd Safuan.
Barisan pembelaan diwakili peguam Afiq M. Noor mewakili Tangam manakala Rajpal Singh mewakili Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan diwakili Shamsul Iskandar.
– Bernama
KUALA LUMPUR: Timbalan Ketua Parti Keadilan Rakyat Cabang Rasah R. Tangam, yang didakwa sebelum ini berhubung perhimpunan Bersih 3.0, hari ini mengaku tidak bersalah di Mahkamah Sesyen terhadap pertuduhan tambahan iaitu merusuh pada perhimpunan itu, di Jalan Raja, 28 April lepas.Peguam kanan Rajesh Kumar Gejinder Nath, 45, dan Exco Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK) Farhan Ibrahim@Alias, 29, yang juga telah didakwa sebelum ini, turut mengaku tidak bersalah atas pertuduhan sama.
Mereka didakwa bersama penyokong ‘Gabungan Pilihan Raya Bersih dan Adil (Bersih 3.0)’ yang melebihi lima orang yang masih bebas menentang perintah Majistret Zaki Asyraf Zubir dengan menggunakan kekerasan dan keganasan, semasa perhimpunan itu.
Pada 26 April lalu, Zaki Asyraf mengeluarkan perintah melarang orang awam mengadakan perhimpunan di kawasan Dataran Merdeka pada 28 April hingga 1 Mei lepas.
Tangam, 50, Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan didakwa melakukan kesalahan itu di Jalan Raja, 3 petang, 28 April lalu dan didakwa mengikut Seksyen 147 Kanun Keseksaan yang membawa hukuman penjara sehingga dua tahun atau denda atau kedua-duanya sekali jika disabitkan kesalahan.
Bulan lepas, ketiga-tiga mereka didakwa di mahkamah yang sama terhadap pertuduhan melanggar perintah Mahkamah Majistret itu.
Sementara itu, seorang lelaki hari ini turut didakwa terhadap pertuduhan tambahan iaitu menyebabkan kecederaan terhadap wartawan stesen TV Al-Hijrah, Mohd Azri Mohd Salleh, 28, di Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, pada 3.50 petang, 28 April lalu.
Tertuduh, Mohd Safuan Mamat@Nordin, 25, didakwa mengikut Seksyen 323 Kanun Keseksaan yang membawa hukuman penjara sehingga setahun atau denda sebanyak RM2,000 atau kedua-duanya jika sabit kesalahan.
Dia yang diwakili peguam Mohd Tajuddin Abd Razak sebelum ini didakwa terhadap dua pertuduhan iaitu merosakkan kenderaan milik Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) dengan menggunakan sebuah kon dan mendatangkan kecederaan kepada Konstabel Mohamad Kamil Paiman.
Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Mohamad Hanafiah Zakaria memohon kepada mahkamah agar kes Tangam, Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan dibicarakan bersama.
Hakim Mahmud Abdullah menetapkan 2 Julai ini untuk sebutan semula kes Tangam, Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan dan menetapkan 4 hingga 7 Sept tarikh bicara bagi kes Mohd Safuan.
Barisan pembelaan diwakili peguam Afiq M. Noor mewakili Tangam manakala Rajpal Singh mewakili Rajesh Kumar dan Farhan diwakili Shamsul Iskandar.
– Bernama
Anwar covered up Bank Negara losses, says RPK
The influential blogger said the former deputy prime minister had absolved Bank Negara of any wrong-doing in 1994, which prompted Lim Kit Siang to accuse Anwar Ibrahim of lying.
PETALING JAYA: Former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim was involved in covering up the multi-billion ringgit losses by Bank Negara some 20 years ago, blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin claimed.
In his blog posting yesterday, the blogger said that even DAP veteran Lim Kit Siang had called Anwar a liar in 1994 when the latter was alleged to have denied it.
“Lim raised the matter in Parliament back in the mid-1990 and Anwar denied it. Lim was so upset that he accused Anwar of lying to the august House,” alleged Raja Petra.
Raja Petra was responding to former Bank Negara deputy governor Rosli Yaakop’s allegation two days ago, when the latter reportedly told a forum that there were four people involved in the losses amounting to RM30 billion suffered by Bank Negara in mid-90s.
Rosli named former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, former Finance Minister Daim Zainuddin, former Bank Negara governor, the late Jaafar Hussein, and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nor Mohamed Yakcop of being involved in the scandal.
He accused them of gambling recklessly on the foreign exchange (forex) speculation activities at the expense of Bank Negara’s assets.
It was said that Jaafar and Nor were trying to beat billionaire financial speculator George Soros in the forex speculation market.
When the matter was raised in Parliament in April 1994 by Lim, Anwar had denied it, saying he was “fully satisfied with the reasons” given by Jaffar for the Bank Negara’s forex losses.
Raja Petra said that Anwar’s attempt to cover up the losses itself is tantamount to him being involved in the scandal.
The blogger also queried Rosli, who is also a PAS member, on why he did not expose the matter in 1999, when he resigned from Bank Negara.
“Why after more than 10 years did he decide to speak up even though he has not offered any evidence to support his allegation?” asked Raja Petra.
PETALING JAYA: Former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim was involved in covering up the multi-billion ringgit losses by Bank Negara some 20 years ago, blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin claimed.In his blog posting yesterday, the blogger said that even DAP veteran Lim Kit Siang had called Anwar a liar in 1994 when the latter was alleged to have denied it.
“Lim raised the matter in Parliament back in the mid-1990 and Anwar denied it. Lim was so upset that he accused Anwar of lying to the august House,” alleged Raja Petra.
Raja Petra was responding to former Bank Negara deputy governor Rosli Yaakop’s allegation two days ago, when the latter reportedly told a forum that there were four people involved in the losses amounting to RM30 billion suffered by Bank Negara in mid-90s.
Rosli named former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, former Finance Minister Daim Zainuddin, former Bank Negara governor, the late Jaafar Hussein, and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nor Mohamed Yakcop of being involved in the scandal.
He accused them of gambling recklessly on the foreign exchange (forex) speculation activities at the expense of Bank Negara’s assets.
It was said that Jaafar and Nor were trying to beat billionaire financial speculator George Soros in the forex speculation market.
When the matter was raised in Parliament in April 1994 by Lim, Anwar had denied it, saying he was “fully satisfied with the reasons” given by Jaffar for the Bank Negara’s forex losses.
Raja Petra said that Anwar’s attempt to cover up the losses itself is tantamount to him being involved in the scandal.
The blogger also queried Rosli, who is also a PAS member, on why he did not expose the matter in 1999, when he resigned from Bank Negara.
“Why after more than 10 years did he decide to speak up even though he has not offered any evidence to support his allegation?” asked Raja Petra.
Why still no action over MyKad brawl?
Aastivaram Foundation vice president R Sri Sanjeevan says the police must act on the matter as the brawl happened right outside the Prime Minister's Office.
PETALING JAYA: A non-governmental organisation queried on why the police have not charged anyone over the brawl between MIC and PKR members outside the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) last month.
Aastivaram Foundation vice president R Sri Sanjeevan said the brawl happened in early May but the police were hesitating to act as there were photographic evidence of the fight.
“And the pictures clearly showed that MIC members started the fight. Are Barisan Nasional (BN) members immune from the law?” asked Sanjeevan.
On May 2, a PKR delegation to the PMO, led by party vice president N Surendran, got embroiled in a fist-fight with several MIC youth members after a heated exchange.
The brawl resulted in Puchong PKR division chief S Murali suffering severe eye injury and was rushed to a nearby hospital.
Targetting Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein, Sanjeevan reminded the minister of his promises that he would act without fear and favour on any criminal activity.
“If Hishammuddin fears losing Indian support by acting on the matter, the minister’s inaction will erode support for the BN at an even greater scale,” he said.
PETALING JAYA: A non-governmental organisation queried on why the police have not charged anyone over the brawl between MIC and PKR members outside the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) last month.Aastivaram Foundation vice president R Sri Sanjeevan said the brawl happened in early May but the police were hesitating to act as there were photographic evidence of the fight.
“And the pictures clearly showed that MIC members started the fight. Are Barisan Nasional (BN) members immune from the law?” asked Sanjeevan.
On May 2, a PKR delegation to the PMO, led by party vice president N Surendran, got embroiled in a fist-fight with several MIC youth members after a heated exchange.
The brawl resulted in Puchong PKR division chief S Murali suffering severe eye injury and was rushed to a nearby hospital.
Targetting Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein, Sanjeevan reminded the minister of his promises that he would act without fear and favour on any criminal activity.
“If Hishammuddin fears losing Indian support by acting on the matter, the minister’s inaction will erode support for the BN at an even greater scale,” he said.
Skandal Wang Asing BNM 1992-93: Ziarah Semula
Pada hari Rabu, 30 Mei 2012, awal pagi, saya menerima satu pesanan ringkas yang berbunyi: “Salam Dr. Rosli. Kaifahal? Saya Syed Mikael dari Penang Institute. Berhajat besar utk menjemput tuan hadir memberi pdgn dlm satu forum khas bertajuk “Bank Negara Forex Scandal: When Government Becomes Speculator.” Forum ini bakal diadakan pada 2.30 ptg, Sabtu ini 2 Jun 2012 di Dewan Sri Pinang, Padang Kota Lama, Pulau Pinang. Selain tuan, CM Lim Guan Eng dan DS Anwar Ibrahim turut jd panelis. Ini adalah permintaan pribadi DSAI kpd tuan. Harap dapat hadir.”Apabila membaca mesej itu saya menjadi kelam kabut (tetapi saya tahu ayat terakhir itu adalah tambahan dengan maksud tidak sopan kalau saya menolak). Pertama, saya memang sudah ada program tetap di hujung minggu. Setiap minggu, kecuali ada hal yang lebih utama, mulai petang hari Khamis sehinggalah ke petang hari Ahad, saya mesti berada di Rembau – turun padang. Kedua, pada hari Jumaat, 1 Jun, saya mesti hadir bersama-sama rombongan dari Rembau ke program “Himpunan Hijau ke Putra Jaya” di Alor Star, Kedah. Ketiga, pada hari Ahad, 3 Jun, saya mesti kembali ke Rembau kerana majlis perkahwinan anak buah (anak adik) saya. Saya tahu ibu saya akan sedih jika saya tidak bersama di majlis itu.
Keempat, masa yang ada memang suntuk dan amat sukar bagi saya untuk membuat persediaan, tambahan lagi, ini bukan subjek yang mudah.
Kelima, maudhu’ yang akan dibicarakan sudah lama saya tinggalkan. Kali terakhir saya berbicara mengenainya ialah pada April 2006 bila pemberita akhbar Malaysiakini menemubual saya mengenainya. Betul, saya ada menulis mengenainya tetapi saya kena mentelaah kembali tulisan-tulisan itu kerana banyak perinciannya yang saya telah lupa.
Keputusan saya: saya kena tolak undangan. Namun, hati saya terus berbolakbalik di antara hendak kata ia atau tidak.
Saya akhirnya menalipon Syed Mikael menyatakan, dengan hati yang berat dan rasa terbeban, “setuju.” Perkiraan saya ialah saya memang akan ke utara dan program mingguan di Rembau pun telah dibatalkan kerana ramai ahli yang akan ke Kedah menyertai perhimpuan hijau dan setelah berjanji kepada ibu, saya akan berada di Rembau pada pagi Ahad itu, Insya Allah.
Saya dan isteri ke Pulau Pinang pada hari Khamis 31 Mei bertolak dari Subang Jaya pada pukul 5 pagi dan sampai di Pulau Pinang pada pukul 8.30 pagi. Kami menginap di Hotel Equitorial. Berbekalkan sedikit maklumat yang saya telah kumpulkan sebelum bertolak, saya memerapkan diri di bilik hotel, mentelalah bahan yang saya bawa dan melayari internet untuk bahan tambahan dalam menyediakan satu power point presentation untuk dibentangkan di dalam forum.
Isteri saya merungut kerana saya tidak membawa beliau bersiar-siar di Pulau Pinang. Hendak menziarahi saudara mara pun terpaksa dilupakan. Dia reda sedikit bila pada sebelah senjanya, kami keluar makan malam di restoran Pak Su di Sungai Dua dan makan durian dari dusun Pak Su sendiri yang turut dijaja di situ. Kembali ke hotel saya terus menyambung kerja hingga lewat malam.
Sesudah subuh, hari Jumaat, 1 Jun, dalam hujan yang lebat, kami memandu kereta ke Alor Setar. Program di Alor Setar memang menyemarakkan semangat perjuang tetapi meletihkan. Bila kembali dari Alor Setar pada dinihari, Sabtu 2 Jun, saya menginap di Hotel Penaga, di Hutton Lane. Se awal selepas sembahyang subuh, saya menyambung kerja menyiapkan ppp. Ianya siap pada pukul 12.30 petang dan terus saya emelkan kepada Syed Mikael kerana saya telah berjanji akan emel kepada beliau pada sebelah pagi. Saya terlewat.
Saya tiba di Dewan Sri Pinang pada pukul 2.00 petang. Forum bermula pada kira-kira pukul 3.30 petang kerana DSAI yang berkereta dari Kuala Lumpur terperangkap di dalam kesesakan lalu lintas di Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan. Perjalanan mengambil masa lima setengah jam berbanding 3-4 jam jika tiada kesesakan.
Kepada kira-kira 400 hadirin dan hadirat di majlis forum itu saya memberitahu ada sekurang-kurang lapan isu utama yang mengundang jawapan berkaitan dengan tajuk forum itu (forum diadakan dalam Bahasa Inggeris). Saya kongsi isu-isu dan jawapan yang saya kemukakan di forum itu dengan pembaca Harakah.
Pertama, wajarkah Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) berspekulasi di pasaran pertukaran wang asing?
Tidak. BNM tidak boleh sama sekali terlibat di dalam kegiatan spekulasi di dalam pasaran wang kerana risiko kerugian daripada kegiatan ini amat tinggi. Fungsi sebenar BNM adalah sebaliknya, iaitu, memerangi kegiatan spekulasi. Di dalam pasaran pertukaran wang asing khususnya, fungsi teras BNM ialah menjaga dan melindungi nilai Ringgit Malaysia (MYR) berbanding nilai matawang asing khususnya matawang rakan dagang utama negara seperti Dolar Amerika (USD), Ringgit Singapura, Paun British (GBP), Deutch Mark (DM), Yen, Swiss Franc, French Franc dan sebagainya. BNM mesti melindungi MYR dari serangan spekulatif dan menjaga nilai pertukaran MRY supaya sentiasa stabil dan pasaran wang setiasa cukup kecairan.
Kedua, bilakah BNM mula terlibat di dalam kegiatan spekulasi di dalam pasaran pertukaran wang asing?
BNM mula melibatkan diri di dalam kegiatan spekulasi di pasaran pertukaran wang apabila Tan Sri Jaffar Hussien (arwah) dilantik Gabenor pada tahun 1985. Gabenor-Gabenor sebelum beliau – Tun Ismail Ali (arwah) dan Tan Sri Aziz Taha (meletak jawatan) – semuanya menentang kegiatan spekulasi matawang. Malah, mereka sentiasa mempertahankan BNM sebagai badan yang harus bebas dari campur tangan pemerintahan. Kerana tidak rela dijadikan “budak suruhan” kepada Menteri Kewangan yang mengarahkan Tan Sri Aziz berbuat sesuatu yang bertentangan dengan prinsip dan etika bank pusat, beliau memilih meletakkan jawatan. Mungkin, antaranya, beliau enggan berspekulasi di pasaran wang asing.
Isyarat bahawa BNM akan bersepekulasi di pasaran pertukaran wang asing disebut di dalam satu syarahan yang disampaikan oleh TSJH di Delhi dalam tahun 1989. Beliau menyebut bahawa beliau telah menambahkan dimensi ketiga dan keempat kepada pengurusan rizab BNM, iaitu, mengoptimamkan keuntungan dan membangunkan kemahiran berurusniaga di dalam pasaran wang asing. Sebelum ini, teras utama pengurusan rizab adalah menjaga dan melindunigi nilai MYR dan mengekalkan kecairan di dalam pasaran. Sejak dari itu bermulalah penglibatan BNM dalam kegiatan spekulasi di pasaran wang asing dalam skala besar dengan tujuan menjana keuntangan maksimam sehingga mengkesampingkan teras utama pengurusan rizab.
BNM bukan lagi berspekulasi di dalam pasaran untuk menjaga nilai ringgit tetapi berjudi dengan harapan mendapat untung besar dan segera. Bila ada pihak yang bertanya kenapa BNM berspekulasi secara besar-besaran sedangkan tidak ada mana-mana bank pusat yang berbuat demikian, maka TSJH sering memberi alasan “untuk mempertahankan nilai ringgit dan mengawal inflasi.” Ini terbukti falsu kemudiannya apabila kerugian besar akibat berjudi terdedah dan nilai pertukaran asing MYR merudum dalam tahun 1997-98 diserang spekulator.
Ketiga, Berapa besar dana digunakan BNM untuk berjudi di dalam pasaran pertukaran asing?
Kerana ketiadaan penyiasatan, jumlah dana terlibat sukar diperinci. Tetapi, pakar-pakar pasaran memang mengetahui bahawa pada satu ketika BNM (sebelum skandal terdedah) adalah pemain terbesar di dalam pasaran pertukaran wang asing di dunia. Lawannya hanyalah George Soros, “penyangak matawang.” Akhbar Reuter pernah melaporkan bahawa BNM adalah “sebuah kuasa yang dominan di dalam pasaran pertukaran wang sejak beberapa tahun kebelakangan ini. Bahawa, BNM telah menjana keuntungan yang agak lumayan dari kegiatan itu sejak sebelum tahun 1992-93, telah mendorong BNM untuk bermain di dalam pasaran pertukran asing dalam skala yang semakin besar.”
Pedagang-pedagang matawang asing biasanya berjual beli dalam lot USD1 juta, USD5 juta dan paling tinggi USD 10 juta. Tetapi BNM berniaga dalam lot USD 50 juta dan kadang-kadang dalam lot USD1 bilion (dalam istilah pasaran, ini dipanggil satu ela) dalam sehari. Amat jarang sekali peniaga matawang asing berjual beli dalam lot yang besar. Penanding yang paling hampir kepada BNM dalam kegiatan jual beli di dalam pasaran pertukaran asing ini ialah pengurus-pengurus dana Jepun. Itu pun mereka berani bermain paling tinggi dalam lot USD50 juta dan setakat sekali atau dua kali setahun. BNM bermain dalam lot-lot besar ini setiap hari. Ertinya, BNM memang berjudi di dalam pasaran, satu aktiviti yang tidak ada kena-mengena langsung dengan fungsi “mempertahankan nilai ringgit dan mengawal inflasi.”
Strategi BNM ialah membeli dahulu sesuatu matang wang dalam jumlah beberapa bilion USD dan setelah urusan pertama ini selesai (selang beberapa minit sahaja), ia akan membeli beberapa billion USD lagi. Ini menjana kejutan di dalam pasaran dan pedgang-pedagang lain menjadi panik dan akan tergesa-gesa membeli matawang berkenanan. Akibatnya, harga akan naik dan ketika itulah BNM menjual pegangannya dan menjana keuntungan lumayan. Akhirnya, pedagang-pedagang lain akan tahu helah ini dan bila mereka tahu, mereka akan bertindak balas. Maka bertemulah buku dengan ruas.
Dalam tahun 1992, BNM berjudi di dalam Paun British (GBP). Ia membeli dengan jangkaan GPB akan naik nilai. Pada masa yang sama, George Soros membuat “short selling” ke atas GBP (jual dulu dan beli kemudian) kerana dia menjangka nilai GBP akan jatuh di masa hadapan. Jangkaan soros tepat. Nilai GBP jatuh. BNM rugi USD5.5 bilion dan Soros untung USD1.7 bilion. TSJH berbohong dengan mengumumkan bahawa BNM hanya rugi di atas kertas sebanyak RM9.3 bilion. Hanya kemudian (dalam tahun 1993) beliau mengakui BNM rugi RM10.1 bilion.
Pakar-pakar membuat anggaran bahawa kerugian sebesar itu hanya boleh terjadi kalau BNM berspekulasi dalam pasaran sebanyak US27-33 bilion. Jumlah ini 5 kali ganda jumlah rizab BNM pada masa itu dan lebih besar dari nilai asset BNM, iaitu, USD20.7 bilion ketika itu, bermakna BNM sudah bankrap. Ini bukan hendak menjaga nilai ringgit dan mengawal inflasi, ini berjudi sakan.
Perjudian BNM di dalam pasaran pertukaran wang asing ini telah dikesan oleh bank pusat Amerika (Federal Reserve Bank) dan Gabenornya pada masa itu, Alan Greenspan telah menggesa BNM menghentikan segera perbuatan itu. Tetapi, BNM buat pekak badak. Ia terus bermain judi dan akhirnya rugi besar lagi dalam tahun 1993.
Akhbar “Malaysia Business” melaporkan bahawa pada kemuncaknya, BNM pernah berspekulasi di dalam pasaran pertukaran wang asing sehingga RM270 bilion (USD90-100 bilion). Pedagang-pedagang matawang asing BNM amat agresif dan digelar “pembuli pasaran” (market bully). Mereka seolah-oleh diberi oleh bos mereka cek kosong, berbelanja ikut suka. Yang sebenarnya, yang berjudi itu seorang sahaja, iaitu Nor Mohamed Yakcop. Khabarnya (berita yang hangat di kalangan kakitangan BNM), apa yang beliau buat ialah beliau berjual beli menggunakan komputer orang lain - pegawai-pegawai di bawah beliau. Beliau akan bergerak dari satu komputer ke satu komputer sehingga pasaran melihat BNM mempunyai ramai pedagang matawang asing yang agresif walhal yang agresif hanya seoarng sahaja. Beliau selalu datang mesyuarat lambat dan ketika mesyuarat sedang berjalan, keluar pergi ke kamar dagangan (dealing room). Beliau membuat laporan palsu kepada Gabenor tetapi kerana dia licik, maka Gebenor percaya semua laporan sehinggalah “nasi telah menjadi bubur” barulah Gabenor sedar orang yang dipercayainya selama ini telah bermain kayu tiga dengan beliau, buat cerita dongeng.
Keempat, berapa besarkah kerugian yang ditanggung BNM akibat dari perjudian itu?
Memang sukar diketahui dengan tepat tanpa penyiasatan. YB Lim Kit Siang pernah menyebut di parlimen bahawa jumlah kesemua kerugian ialah RM30 bilion, satu jumlah yang amat menggerunkan. Inilah jumlah kerugian yang paling kerap disebut di kalangan pemain pasaran.
BNM mengakui kerugian sebanyak RM10.1 bilion dalam tahun 1992 dan RM5.7 bilion dalam tahun 1993. Jumlahnya RM15.8 bilion, kira-kira setengah dari anggaran pakar. Jumlah yang diakui oleh BNM itu memang secara muslihat direndahkan. Sebahagian kerugian itu disorokkan melalui menilai semula pegangan emas BNM pada harga pasaran yang telah menjadi lebih tinggi berbanding harga mula-mula ia dibeli dan menilai pelaburan BNM dalam saham tersenarai dan beberapa lagi harta yang lain. BNM juga menggunakan “creative accounting” bagi menyorok kerugian. Kerugian telah ditukarkan menjadi “harta” dengan mencipta istilah baru perakaunan, iaitu, “deferred expenditure” atau “perbelanjaan tertunda” – wang telah dibelanjakan dahulu tetapi akan dibayar secara ansuran kemudian. Ini adalah penipuan. TSJH, seorang akauntan bertauliah, telah menderhakai profesyen beliau sendiri.
Kelima, siapakah yang bertangungjawab di atas kerugian?
BNM berjudi sakan di pasaran pertukaran matawang asing semasa Tun Daim Zainuddin (TDZ) menjadi Menteri Kewangan. Semua orang maklum, TDZ ini seorang spekulator besar dalam pasaran saham. Beliau menjana kekayaan melalui spekulasi di pasaran saham. Dengan nada angkuh beliau pernah dilaporkan berkata: “Apa yang saya jana di pasaran saham itu hanyalah duit poket saya.”
Diyakini bahawa arahan “pergi buat duit di pasaran pertukaran asing” kepada BNM datangnya dari TDZ dan tentunya direstui oleh Perdana Menteri Tun Mahathir Mohamad (TMM). Umum mengetahui kedua-dua mereka rapat, bagaikan isu dengan kuku. Arahan itu dilaksanakan kerana BNM memiliki seorang Gabenor yang berwatak “Yes Man” bukan macam Tun Ismail Ali dan Tan Sri Aziz Taha. Harus diingat TDZ – kerana gagal menundukkan Tan Sri Aziz Taha dengan arahan tidak munasabah - telah berjaya menekan Tan Sri Aziz sehingga beliau meletak jawatan. Gabenor TSJH pula mempunyai “Yes Man” lapisan kedua, iaitu, Nor Mohamed Yakcop.
Pada peringkat BNM, kerugian gergasi ini adalah tanggungjawab TSJH dan Nor Mohamed Yakcop sepenuhnya. Mereka, walaubagaimana pun mengambil arahan daripada dan membuat laporan terus kepada TDZ dan TMM mengenai permainan mereka di pasaran matawang ini. Pegawai tinggi BNM yang lain tidak tahu apa-apa. Timbalan Gabenor pada masa itu, Tan Sri Dr. Lin See Yan diketepikan. Sesungguhnya, mereka berdua telah terpesong jauh dari batasan (went overboard) dalam memperjudikan harta BNM di pasaran pertukaran asing. Mereka bukan berspekulasi tetapi berjudi secara cuai dan tidak bertanggung jawab dengan tidak mengendahkan langsung tentang keselamatan harta BNM dan harta negara. Mungkin mereka bernafsu besar untuk mengalahkan Goerge Soros yang dikenali sebagai “raja perompak” (robber baron) itu bertujuan memenangi hati bos mereka bahawa mereka mempunyai kepakaran tanpa tolok banding di dalam urusniaga matawang asing.
Jadi, empat orang adalah orang yang harus dipertanggungjawabkan sepenuhnya di atas kerugian gergasi yang ditanggung BNM akibat perjudian di pasaran pertukaran asing – Perdana Menteri, Tun Mahathir Mohamad, Menteri Kewangan, Tun Dain Zainuddin, Gabenor, Tan Sri Jaffar Hussein dan Nor Mohamed Yakcop.
Bila Dato Sri Anwar Ibrahim mengambil alih sebagai Menteri Kewangan dalam tahiun 1991, BNM memang sudah terperangkap di dalam perjudian di pasaran. Beliau dinafikan maklumat mengenai keterdedahan BNM dalam pasaran pertukaran asing – berapa besar pelaburan, untung atau rugi, semuanya disembunyikan dari beliau. Beliau mendapat maklumat serpihan dari pihak ketiga.
Beliau, seperti yang diakui. pernah meminta maklumat terperinci dari Gabenor TSJH tetapi beliau disuruh pergi memintanya daripada Perdana Menteri. Bila DSAI dilantik Menteri Kewangan, kerugian telah menggunung - “nasi telah menjadi bubur.” Apa yang boleh beliau buat hanyalah memberhentikan pendarahan dan itu beliau telah berjaya buat.
Beliau “membuang” Gabenor dan Nor Mohamed Yakcop dari BNM pada pertengahan tahun 1994 selepas pembentangan laporan Tahunan BNM 1993 yang mendedahkan kerugian dari spekulasi wang asing itu. Beliau juga melarang sama sekali BNM dari bersepekulasi di pasaran matawang asing. Larangan ini berkuatkusa hingga kini.
Penganalisis merasakan beliau akhirnya membayar kos yang tinggi atas tindakan beliau itu – difitnah, dibuang kerja dan dipenjara 6 tahun.
Orang yang memberi arahan supaya BNM berspekulasi di pasaran wang asing adalah TMM dan TDZ dan “kerja kotor” diserahkan kepada TSJH dan NMY untuk melaksanakannya. Jadi, TSJH dan NMY mempunyai pelindung. Sebab itu mereka bebas, tidak didakwa langsung.
Keenam, Kenapakah orang yang bertanggungjawab dibiarkan lepas-bebas?
Nor Mohamed Yakcop dipaksa meletak jawatan pada Julai 1994, satu hukuman yang amat ringan berbanding jenayah yang telah beliau lakukan terhadap negara. Malah, beliau kemudiannya diberi habuan lebih besar – kembali ke BNM dan menjadi menteri kabinet.
TSJH juga dipersilakan meletakkan jawatan tetapi dengan segera beliau dilantik menjadi Timbalan Pengerusi PNB sebagai habuan. Sejak dari itu, beliau hidup murung – jarang mendapat liputan media - dan dua tahun kemudian beliau menginggal dunia akibat penyakit barah.
Perdana Menteri dan TDZ pula tida siapa yang berani sentuh. Buat penyiasatan mereka tidak mahu. Mereka tidak lut undang-undang.
Ketujuh, kenapakah skandal kerugian pertukaran asing BNM tidak disiasat?
Ini adalah kerana, pertama, pemimpin tertinggi negara nampaknya terlibat dan bersekongkol dalam perjudian ini. Kedua, penyiasataan mungkin mendedahkan banyak kepincangan dan perkara buruk yang boleh membawa kacau bilau politik kepada golongan berkuasa. Ketiga, perincian-perincian skandal ini mungkin terlalu mengerikan (too gruesome) kepada umum dan boleh menyebabkan malu besar kepada golongan berkuasa, sekiranya didedahkan. Keempat, wujud unsur-unsur jenayah di dalam skandal berkenaan yang boleh menyebabkan orang bertanggungjawab masuk penjara bukan masuk kabinet seperti yang berlaku sekarang.
YB Lim Kit Siang telah mencadangan di Parlimen supaya Suruhanjaya PenyiasatanDiraja ditubuhkan untuk menyiasat skandal kerugian pertukaran asing ini tetapi cadangan tidak langsung diendahkan.
Kelapan, patutkah PR (jika memerintah) menyiasat kembali skandal ini?
Di Mongolia, dua orang bekas Gabenor dan tiga orang kakitangan bank pusat negara itu telah didakwa dimahkamah atas tuduhan kecuaian dan melebihi kuasa sehingga menyebabkan kerugian USD90 juta di pasaran pertukaran asing. TSJH dan NMY telah melakukan kesalahan yang lebih besar dan menyebabkan kerugian gergasi, maka sudah sewajarnya mereka di bawa ke muka pengadilan. Mereka mestilah disiasat. Jenayah yang terlibat termasuklah kecuaian, menyalahgunakan kuasa, memalsukan akaun, memesongkan maklumat, pecah amanah, konspirasi dan rasuah.
Aktiviti spekulasi yang dibuat sebenarnya berlawan dengan prinsip-prinsip utama bank pusat. Bank pusat sepatutnya membanteras spekulasi. Manakan boleh BNM melibatkan diri di dalam kegiatan spekulasi di pasaran matawang asing secara besar-besaran?
Kerugian wang rakyat terlalu besar untuk dilupakan begitu sahaja. Maka wajiblah kerajaan PR menubuhkan Suruhanjaya Diraja untuk menyiasat skandal ini walaupun ia telah terlewat 20 tahun.
Penulis mengucapkan terima kasih kepada Penang Institute kerana memberi ruang kepada penulis untuk berkongsi maklumat dengan orang ramai.
-Dr. Rosli Yaakop
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)