Jailed Afghan rape victim freed

Gulnaz, freed from jail, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for adultery after a relative raped her two years ago

Kabul, Afghanistan (CNN) -- An Afghan woman imprisoned for adultery after a relative raped her has been freed after President Hamid Karzai intervened on her behalf.

The woman, identified only as Gulnaz for her own protection, had been sentenced to prison for 12 years after she reported that her cousin's husband had raped her two years ago. Wednesday, she was free at a women's shelter in Kabul, with her daughter.

Her plight gained international attention when the European Union blocked the broadcast of a documentary about her ordeal, saying it would further jeopardize her safety.

Afghan Justice Minister Habibullah Ghaleb and a judiciary committee both proposed a pardon. Karzai then ordered authorities to decree Gulnaz's release.

After the attack two years ago, Gulnaz hid what happened as long as she could. She was afraid of reprisals. But soon she began vomiting in the mornings and showing signs of pregnancy. It was her attacker's child.

In Afghanistan, this brought her not sympathy but prosecution. She was found guilty by the courts of sex outside of marriage -- adultery -- and sentenced to 12 years in jail. She was only 19.

As shocking as it may seem, Gulnaz's case is far from isolated.

Last month, CNN asked a spokesman for the prosecutor to comment on the case. The reply was that there were hundreds of such cases, and the office would need time to look into it.

Reported cases of violence against women, from domestic abuse to rape to honor killings, are on the rise, according to the Afghan Women's Network.

One problem is that Afghan law fails to clearly distinguish between rape and adultery, which is a crime under Shariah, or Islamic law. The courts say Gulnaz was to blame for having sex with a married man.

Interview with Gulnaz

In conservative Afghan society, Gulnaz faces considerable pressure to marry her attacker, soothing the rift between the two families, restoring her honor and legitimizing her daughter.

She was willing to do so in order to end her incarceration, she told CNN last month from Kabul's Badam Bagh jail, though she does not want that option. She would like to marry an educated man, according to U.S. attorney Kimberly Motley in Kabul.

Gulnaz's choices now are stark. Women in her situation are often killed for the shame their ordeal has brought the community.

A United Nations human rights document on Afghan women said "women are perceived as receptacles of family honor, their opposition to family dictates about marriage often puts them at risk of brutal physical punishment. So-called 'honor' killings recognize a man's right to kill a woman with impunity because of the damage that her immoral actions have caused to family honor."

Gulnaz could still be at risk from her attacker's family.

From jail, Gulnaz's convicted rapist denied raping her. Her life would probably end if she ever made it out of jail, he said. But it would be her family, not his, that would kill her out of the shame she has wrought.

How Gulnaz will be able to re-assimilate into the life she once had remains a difficult question. She is free from jail but not from her ordeal.

Defendant Marries His Victim

Bandung. The defendant in an abduction and abuse case married his victim in a mosque located inside the Bandung district court on Tuesday.

“It amazed me. This was the first time I witnessed this kind of wedding,” said justice Nur Aslan, the judge who handled the case.

Rizki Ahmad Fauzi, the suspect, was reported for abusing and abducting Tessa Rizki.

He was charged with abduction and abuse which carries a maximum sentence of nine years.

“The parents of the victim have forgiven him,” Nur said. “But that doesn’t mean he’s free.”

Tessa fainted right after the religious wedding vow ceremony. But Nur said that she fainted because of happiness.

One of the judges at the Bandung district court gave Rizki a wedding suit, while Nur did Tessa’s make-up.

Antara

Manoharan: Detention under ISA was worth it

A lawyer who was arrested under the Internal Security Act for involvement in the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) has described his detention as ‘worthwhile’ because it has raised political awareness among Indian Malaysians.

Speaking about his arrest on Dec 13, 2007, along with four others, M Manoharan said Indians, particularly the youth, have realised that each individual has a role to play in highlighting the community’s plight.

“Many Indians took BN for granted. They now know they have been cheated. They woke up and became politically alert. I must thank them for supporting us through our arrest,” Manoharan said in a telephone interview.

“They now know their rights and are finally brave enough to voice (their demands).”

Manoharan was able to win the Kota Alam Shah state assembly seat while held for four months at the Kamunting Detention Camp in Perak.

His victory was due to the unprecedented number of volunteers and Hindraf supporters who campaigned for him.

The DAP had previously fielded him several times - unsuccessfully - in various seats.

Manoharan described his incarceration as a “very painful” experience but said he does not regret it.

“It was worth it. The only regret I have is right now, there is so much to do for the Indian community, and I am unable to do enough,” he said.

‘Najib had a hand in our arrest’

Manoharan said it was incumbent upon him and others in the Hindraf movement to continue their struggle to help the Indian community because of the support they received during their detention.

“They were with us all the way. They walked with us, carried us, went on fasts for us and prayed for us. Now it is my turn to give back as a state assemblyperson,” he said.

He believes that, over the past four years, there have been fewer police shootings and deaths in police custody, the two factors that sparked the Hindraf movement.

Manoharan urged Indians to remember that Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak was deputy premier at the time of the crackdown against Hindraf.

“He had a role in our arrest and in the persecution of Hindraf supporters,” he claimed.

He also warned the community that the federal government had yet to address long-standing issues that affect Indian Malaysians, such as laws on religious conversion and the preventive detention cases under the Emergency Ordinance.

‘G-Team did not turn off the taps’

G-Team Resources maintains that it is not responsible for the water cuts because it did not sign the initial agreement.

PETALING JAYA: G-Team Resources Sdn Bhd owner G Gnanalingam who was painted as a white knight-turned-villain following water cuts in Tumbuk Estate near Banting has denied that his company is responsible.

“The workers have been enjoying free water and electricity. G-Team categorically is not responsible for the water meter as explained by Syabas representative in the meeting last month.

“The water was cut off because the residents are not paying the bills. The total bill is RM16,000,” Gnanalingam said in a press statement to FMT.

He said this in response to FMT’s report on Monday on the plight of Tumbuk Estate residents who claimed that G-Team did not pay their water bill in a bid to evict the workers.

PSM secretary-general and Oppressed People’s Network (Jerit) spokesman S Arutchelvan also told FMT that G-Team is duty-bound to supply water in accordance with the Estate Housing and Amenities Act 1990.

On the issue of the agreement in 2006, Gnanalingam acknowledged that only 22 workers were interested in the workers’ housing scheme.

(The residents are former estate workers whose services were terminated in March 2006. Subsequently, Maika signed an agreement with the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW) to allow the former workers to continue living in their quarters rent-free until houses were built for them. Under the agreement, Maika would commence construction of the housing scheme in April 2008, but this has not happened.)

Land offer turned down

“Only 22 workers showed interest in participating in the housing scheme and deposited their ex-gratia payments totalling RM201,000 with Maika Holdings Bhd (MHB) to facilitate the downpayment for the houses to be built,” said Gnanalingam.

He also said that Maika had offered land to the people there but they had turned it down.

“In 2008, land was given next to the Tamil school but the workers rejected it because it is next to a pig farm. Another 3.88 acres of land were allotted to them but they also rejected it because of subdivision criteria.”

He also claimed that the families were more interested in obtaining cash than in owning houses.

“A total of 16 out of 22 families already owned their own houses outside (the estate) and had shown no interest in the land.

“The rest stayed on because they could not pay for the house as some were unemployed,” said Gnanalingam.

Gnanalingam, who is also Westports chairman in Port Klang, said that G-Team had offered RM25,000 with an ex-gratia payment of RM201,000 with an interest of four percent to the workers shortly after G-Team had taken over the estate, which was accepted by 14 of the 22 family members.

“All the workers signed the document which had their name and the value.

“Following this, 14 out of 22 workers accepted the cash ranging from RM35,000 to RM42,000 each. The money given was not in MHB’s book,” he said, adding that eight workers refused to accept the compensation.

Outstanding bill settled

Gnanalingam said that at a meeting of the Selangor executive council, councillor Xavier Jayakumar’s office decided to accept the decision of the majority who took up the offer.

Gnanalingam also blamed Jerit for the failure in the negotiations that took place on Thursday.

“Last month, G-Team was called by Selangor Labour Office to discuss the current issue. The matter was explained in the meeting together with the NUPW officer.

“NUPW had asked five days to come back with a proposal to resolve the issue, but it did not return.

“The next meeting was called on Thursday but again, it failed to resolve anything because the workers were not represented by NUPW as they chose to follow the advice of some NGOs.”

Meanwhile in a related development, Jerit coordinator E Nalini informed FMT that the outstanding bill was settled by representative from G-Team.

“The Tumbuk Estate residents were told that RM4,000 was paid to settle their water bills,” said Nalini.

Call to include Tamil announcements at KLIA

An ex-deputy minister says such a move will be a sign of respect for visitors from India.

UPDATED

KUALA LUMPUR: A former deputy minister has called on the government to reconsider its decision not to introduce announcements in Tamil at the KL International Airport in Sepang for the benefit of passengers from India.

T Murugiah, former deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, said there is a need to include Tamil in the airport announcements for the benefit of the large number of Tamil-speaking tourists who visit the country.

Having announcements in Tamil will also be considered as a sign of respect for the visitors from India who are mostly business entrepreneurs and industrialists as well as tourists, he told Bernama today.

Murugiah was responding to the statement by the Transport Ministry yesterday that the government has no plans to make announcements in Tamil at the KLIA as passengers from India speak diverse dialects.

Currently, the announcements are made in Malay, English and Mandarin while announcements in Arabic and Japanese are made seasonally.

Murugiah said the Transport Ministry decision does not reflect the 1Malaysia spirit that is being promoted by the government.

“I also call for the inclusion of the Tamil language on the KLIA signboards in recognition of the 1.8 million Malaysian Indians, the third largest community, in the country,” he added.

Ministry must review its stand

In a related development, MIC secretary-general S Murugessan said the ministry’s decision was disappointing.

“The stated reason that passengers from India speak various other dialects cannot be accepted. First of all, Tamil is not a dialect. It is a well developed and one the finest languages in the world.

“Secondly, a vast majority of passengers from India are from Tamil Nadu, who speak Tamil.

“A simple perusal at the passenger load from Tamil Nadu at KLIA will reveal that a big majority of passengers from India are from Tamil Nadu,” he said in a statement today.

He added that the passenger breakdown will also reveal that the number of passengers from Tamil Nadu far exceed those passengers from Arabic countries or Japan.

“The Transport Ministry must review its stand and make announcement in Tamil at KLIA,” he added.

Mano still fighting the good fight

On the fourth anniversary of his incarceration under the ISA, the Kota Alam Shah assemblyman reminisces about the price he had to pay to fight injustice

GEORGE TOWN: Heads of government departments and agencies should be picked from among ethnic Indians, Chinese and other minority communities, said DAP’s Kota Alam Shah assemblyman M Manoharan.

He said the positions to be considered included the chief secretary to the government, heads of public service departments, police and armed forces, attorney general, auditor general and even chief justice.

“Only when this happens we can claim the country as true 1Malaysia,” he said.

These were among his wishes on the fouth anniversary of detention without trial under the draconian Internal Security Act (ISA). He was arrested in 2007 and released on May 9, 2009.

He said both federal and state governments, including Pakatan Rakyat administrations, should provide more jobs and career opportunities for non Malays in the civil service.

He called on the authorities to abort current piece-meal recruitments and liberalise the civil service employment system.

He also said the government should ensure a minimum 8% interests on EPF savings to give private sector employees worthy retirement benefits.

Manoharan, 51, was among four Hindraf lawyers – P Uthayakumar, R Kenghadharan, V Ganabatirau, and another person, K Vasanthakumar, detained on Dec 13, 2007 pertaining to Hindraf activities.

Manoharan called on the government to immediately release all persons detained without trial under various draconian legislations.

“It was an extremely painful experience being kept in solitary confinement for 514 days in Kamunting Detention Centre away from family, relatives and friends.

“I must thank all those who have fought my release,” he told FMT here today.

Najib’s hand in Hindraf detentions

A lawyer by profession, Manoharan reserved special praises for his mentor, DAP national chairman Karpal Singh and Hindraf activists for relentlessly campaigning for his release.

“Karpal and Hindraf were always there for me from day one when I was detained and until even after my release in May 9, 2009,” said Manoharan.

He is disappointed that Umno-BN federal government had still not abolished ISA and other draconian laws like the Emergency Ordinance (EO) despite promising to do so.

He said many, especially minors and Indian youths, have been detained without trial in detention centres in Johor’s Simpang Renggam, Perak’s Batu Gajah and Kelantan’s Machang.

He accused the police of having wielded the EO at will to detain many Indian youths for even minor scuffles on unproven grounds of gangsterism.

He argued that the police’s unabated malicious EO detentions was part of Umno’s racist policy to brand ethnic Indian youths as gangsters and hooligans.

“As a result, the people have lost confidence in the legal and justice systems,” said Manoharan, who hopes all draconian laws repealed by the 5th anniversary of his detention.

He called on Hindraf supporters and ethnic Indian community not to forget that current Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak also had a hand in the detention of Hindraf lawyers four years ago.

He said being the Deputy Prime Minister and Umno deputy president then, Najib was part of the decision making process to send Hindraf lawyers to Kamunting.

He said despite four years after the Hindraf rally, the government had not taken any affirmative action to address all core issues raised by the civil rights movement.

He said the government had not implemented any religious policy in accordance with the essence of Article 121 (1a) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion.

Until today, he said the Syariah Court was usurping the constitutional powers of federal civil courts pertaining to religious cases such as conversion, marriage and child custody.

“Everyone, especially the government of the day, must address and tackle all issues that contravened Article 121,” said Manoharan, formerly the Selangor DAP chairman.

Remove Interlok

He also called on the government to convert all education loans into scholarships to avoid students turning into permanent debtors.

He said the government should provide proper and free education to all regardless of their racial and religious backgrounds.

He chided the government for deploying illegal means and arm twisting tactics to force defaulters to repay their education loans.

He said for instance the government tactic to stop defaulters from leaving abroad at airports ran foul with the law.

He said the law only provided authorities to disallow a person declared bankrupt, charged with tax evasion or had his passport impounded by court from leaving the country.

Manoharan called on the government to also be transparent on the public university intakes and courses offered to students.

He said it was time to get rid of the double standard policy of capital-aided and fully aided vernacular schools due to land ownership.

He said both federal and state governments, including Pakatan Rakyat administrations, should have resolved the problem by now by allotting free land for these schools.

Lastly, he called on the DPM and Education Minister Muhyiddin Yasin to remove the controversial Interlok novel from school shelves for the next school term.

“The novel insulted non-Malays Muslims … it’s unsuitable for students,” he said.

ABU: Movement of the Rakyat for the Rakyat

“We (ABU) are not linked to any political party. We are independent and this is a movement, not an organization. This is the rakyat’s movement,” he said. Meanwhile, Haris of MCLM who had just been deported from Sabah on Dec 7 said ABU was set to reach to the rakyat with information that will show how Umno have been “manipulating” the country for the past six decades.

by Django Setemolya, Malaysian Digest    

Something big may be brewing in this time of uncertainty surrounding our political landscape. And this time it has nothing to do with Anwar Ibrahim, Pakatan Rakyat, Perkasa or extremist, racist, religious groups or terrorist groups of sort. Instead, this one comes in the form of a sincere initiative by the people, for the people; and the main objective of this movement which fittingly call itself ABU or Asalkan Bukan Umno (Anyone But Umno) is to call out to the rakyat to come out from their silence to reject Umno.

“We are calling out to all workers, farmers, fishermen, associations, organizations, government bodies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties – excluding Umno, opposition parties or Independent parties, professionals, academicians and intellectuals, artists and all those who are marginalized including Mat Rempits, the homeless, unemployed and others to establish clearly (through media statements or demonstrations) our loss of confidence towards Umno which has lost its purpose, corrupt, conceited, oppressive, ruthless and more lately IGNORANT and ARROGANT!” Badrul Hisham told a press conference held at the KL Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall on Dec 9.

Badrul, or better known as CheGubard, who is the president of Solidariti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM) is believed to be one of the main men behind ABU. Among those alongside him at the media conference on Dec 9 were Haris Ibrahim of Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) President Haris Ibrahim as well as representatives from Parti Rakyat Malaysia (PRM), Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) and members of various non-governmental organizations.

Calling All Malaysians

The nationwide movement which had held media conferences in every state in the Peninsula on Dec 9 (the same announcement will be made in Sabah and Sarawak at a later date). ABU can be seen as the voice of Malaysians who are saying ‘enough is enough’. The way they see it, Umno has taken their selfish and excessive desire for material gains too far and it is time to put a stop to this as it has become clear that Umno is beyond repair (NFC and PKFZ are just two of the many scandals that has been exposed of recent, imagine the others that have not been detected). 

“Now is not the time to remain silent anymore and disregard, unless you are willing to bequeath Malaysia which has been impoverished to our future generations. Do we still fail to see or intentionally allow the little that’s left of our democratic rights which have mostly been denied while our demands continue to be ignored?” Badrul added.

Not Linked to Pakatan

Even though Badrul is one of the most influential figure in Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK) among the Opposition youth supporters, he is not playing his role in ABU in his capacity as a political party member, neither are the rest of the key people in the movement. He insisted that ABU is a non-structured movement and people from all segments of life are invited to join the movement.

“We (ABU) are not linked to any political party. We are independent and this is a movement, not an organization. This is the rakyat’s movement,” he said.

During the media conference which declared ABU’s intention, he also announced that ABU will be holding a big forum at Taman Melewar, Gombak on Dec 15 which will be attended by the rakyat from all over the country. He added that the movement will also be making another big announcement which will change the “unhealthy political situation” in the country.

Meanwhile, Haris of MCLM who had just been deported from Sabah on Dec 7 said ABU was set to reach to the rakyat with information that will show how Umno have been “manipulating” the country for the past six decades.

“Even before the Independence, Umno has been largely responsible in manipulating towards the rakyat.

“It is now that ABU will expose all (of Umno’s wrongdoings) and spread it to the rakyat to prove that the sentiments that Umno helps and protects Malaysians are wrong,” said Haris.

NFC Scandal: A Sign That Things Are Getting Out of Control

Things are getting from bad to worse for the country under Umno/BN’s rule. Looking at the latest development on the NFC issue, now even Umno senior leaders like its former president Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Umno supreme council member Bung Mokhtar Radin have come out to ask its main culprit Shahrizat Abdul Jalil to leave the party. Others like Batu Pahat MP Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi and Cheras Umno Division chief Syed Ali Alhabshee have asked NFC’s executive chairman who happens to be Shahrizat’s husband Dr Mohamad Salleh Ismail to come clean on the controversy involving the family-owned company as it has tarnished Umno's image.

Those Umno men are not the only ones who had expressed concern about the party’s bad rep. Other members especially the veterans have also shown that they are getting sick and tired of what has been happening to their once venerable party. The others just choose to remain silent as it has become a culture or rather a sickness in the party for them to be ‘yes men’ and remain silent on any decisions they personally disagree on or are blatantly wrong. Just read the blogposts by these Umno vets and you can sense that all the wrongdoings that has cost damage to people’s wellbeing and even lives (eg Teoh Beng Hock, Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed and Baharuddin Ahmad) has finally taken its toll on the ruling government.

Sure, not everything Umno/BN has done have been bad. They had done good too in the past. But the way things have been going lately the bad heavily outweighs the good, contrary to the level scales which is the symbol being used by BN. Because of this ABU feels that it is absolutely necessary to boldly take the country back on track. It is calling for the people to see through all unbridled rhetoric from Umno/BN and it is saying that the time has come for Malaysians to take the power away from party’s 52-year rule and give it back to the people. This is People Power and this is what this country needs.

Malaysia's Mahathir Defends Sarawak Chieftain

The Doc says it's a go for Taib

Charges of looting Sarawak could just be electioneering, he says
Malaysia’s former Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, has defended Sarawak’s embattled chief minister, Abdul Taib Mahmud, questioning calls by international NGOs for investigations of Taib’s vast fortune.

"When an election is near, you get funny things like this coming out," Mahathir told reporters at a press conference Tuesday. "If it is just a political game to try and undermine somebody's political image then I think it is not right."

If the allegations are true, the 86-year-old Mahathir said, the authorities could be expected to take action. In May, Swiss authorities announced they were investigating accounts held in Swiss banks by the Taib family for evidence of corruption. Shortly after that, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission announced it would also investigate Taib’s holdings, although observers in Kuala Lumpur said it was unlikely that the MACC would follow through, Indeed, one source told Asia Sentinel recently that the investigation had “gone cold.” A Taib spokesman said the funds had been legitimately deposited and that there was no evidence of criminality.

Many political observers expect Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to call national elections in the early part of 2012, possibly in March. Sarawak, the country’s largest state, is key to efforts by the Barisan Nasional, the country’s ruling national coalition, to maintain a healthy majority in parliament. Both Najib and Mahathir earlier this year reportedly tried to dissuade the scandal-ridden chief minister to quit before state elections.

When Taib refused to step down, both had to criss-cross the state, campaigning for Taib’s coalition. However, the coalition produced a two-thirds majority in the state assembly. Although he had publicly offered to step down, the magnitude of the victory impelled him to stay in power.

Mahathir’s defense of Taib was generated by the fact that on Tuesday, NGOs from six different countries issued a joint letter demanding that Malaysia’s sultan appoint a royal commission of inquiry and that authorities arrest and prosecute Taib and 13 members of his family for massive fraud, theft, corruption, illegal appropriation of land and abuse of public office. They allege that the looting of Sarawak’s rich timber and other natural resources has earned Taib’s family billions of US dollars through investment in as many as 400 companies in 25 countries.

They also demanded that a multi-agency task force be appointed to attempt to repatriate the vast sums from other countries to the people of Sarawak.

Research released earlier this month by the Switzerland-based Bruno Manser Fund said official documents show the Taib family stake in 14 Malaysian companies alone is worth US$1.46 billion. The fund has uploaded all of the documents onto the Internet. They can be found here. Billions more are believed to be held in other countries.

The fund said its research only covers publicly available information from Malaysia’s Registry of Companies and other official documents and the total of all of the Taib family’s holdings could run well in excess of that amount.

“Not counting their more hidden wealth, this puts the Taib family firmly into the category of one of the richest families in the world and makes them far richer than the Queen of England (whose assets are a mere half billion pounds),” the fund said.

In all, according to the fund, named for a Swiss environmentalist who disappeared in Sarawak in 2000 while trying to aid the Penan tribe, the family also has stakes in companies in Australia (22 companies), Bermuda (1), the British Virgin Islands (7), Brunei (1), Cambodia (1), Canada (9), the Cayman Islands (1), Fiji (3), Hong Kong (7), India (2), Indonesia (3), Jersey (1), the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (1), Labuan (1), New Zealand (5), the People’s Republic of China (2), the Philippines (1), Singapore (2), Sri Lanka (1), Thailand (2), the United Arab Emirates (1), the United Kingdom (4), the United States of America (6) and Vietnam (1).

Allegations are that as chief minister, Taib granted timber access permits to a plethora of companies, most of them owned by ethnic Chinese, that denuded much of the state of its tropical rainforest. The two NGOs previously reported that Taib's children are the shareholders and directors of numerous companies controlling residential and commercial buildings in Canada, Australia, Britain and the United States together worth hundreds of millions of US dollars. Many of the assets came into their possession when they were in their early 20s and were still college students with no visible access to legitimate resources to invest.

Taib has been chief minister, finance minister and planning and resources management minister of since 1981 and he hardly conceals his vast wealth, riding around the capital of Kuching in a cream-colored Rolls-Royce sedan.

Taib, his four children, eight siblings and his first cousin Hamed bin Sepawi have stakes in 332 companies worth several billion US dollars in Malaysia, the report says. “The Taib family’s share in 14 large companies’ net assets alone has been calculated at US$1.46 billion (RM4.6 billion). The three largest Taib family-linked companies are the 84 percent Taib-owned Cahya Mata Sarawak (net assets RM2.4 billion), the 25 percent Taib-owned Custodev Sdn Bhd (net assets RM1.6 billion) and the at least 35 percent Taib-owned Ta Ann Holdings Bhd (net assets: RM1.4 billion).

Cahya Mata Sarawak is a construction conglomerate listed on the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange (KLSE 2852) that allegedly has benefited enormously from a cement monopoly and from untendered public contracts awarded by the Taib-led Sarawak state government. Ta Ann Holdings Bhd (KLSE 5012), which is chaired by Hamed Sepawi, is an internationally active logging company. Since its foundation in the 1980s, Ta Ann has been granted more than 675,000 hectares of logging and plantation concessions by the Taib government. Privately-held Custodev Sdn Bhd is a Sarawak-based property development company. Achi Jaya Holdings (net assets RM550 million), which is wholly owned by the Taib family, holds a monopoly over log exports from the timber-rich state.

“We consider these corporate interests of the Taib family to be illicit assets”, said Bruno Manser Fund director Lukas Straumann in the prepared release. “There are many clear indications that Taib has abused his public office to build a corruption and fraud-based billion-dollar empire.”

“We are shocked to see that the Taib family has so shamelessly enriched itself while the people of Sarawak have to struggle with widespread poverty and an appalling lack of infrastructure and government services.”

The Bruno Manser Fund called on anti-corruption and anti-money-laundering authorities worldwide to investigate the Taib family’s business activities and freeze Taib family assets in their countries.

Najib risks Malaysia's reputation in his treatment of Anwar Ibrahim

 

If the opposition leader is convicted of sodomy he will become yet another victim of an egregious, politically suspect injustice

Malaysia's opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim is on trial for sodomy. Photograph: Azhar Rahim/EPA

The portents do not look good for Malaysia's opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim, whose trial on highly dubious sodomy charges draws to a close this week. If Anwar is found guilty – and the trial judge seems to have made up his mind already – he will not be the only or even the most important victim of an egregious, politically suspect injustice. Malaysia's democratic reputation will have been critically wounded, and for that outrage, Malaysians will have their prime minister, Najib Razak, to thank.
The plodding Najib's overriding objective is winning the general election expected next year, possibly within a few months. The son of Malaysia's second prime minister, the nephew of its third, president of the dominant United Malays National Organisation (Umno), and a former defence minister, Najib was born to power and is accustomed to wielding it. As the charismatic leader of the opposition coalition, Anwar represents the biggest challenge to his continuing ascendancy.
It hardly seems coincidental that the sodomy charges were levelled at Anwar shortly after the opposition inflicted unprecedented defeats on Umno and its allies in the 2008 elections. Anwar's main campaign plank – combating the official, institutionalised discrimination that favours ethnic Malays over the country's large ethnic Chinese and Indian minorities – threatened the post-colonial order that has kept Umno and its National Front coalition on top since 1957.
In a court appearance earlier this year, Anwar, 64, a married father of six, denied accusations he had had sexual relations with a former male aide. Homosexuality is punishable by law in Malaysia by caning and up to 20 years in jail. The allegations were "a vile and desperate attempt at character assassination" and a "blatant and vicious lie" spread by his political enemies, he said. "This entire process is nothing but a conspiracy by Najib Razak to send me into political oblivion by attempting once again to put me behind bars."
Najib flatly rejects the idea of a political vendetta. But the recycling of sodomy accusations – Anwar was jailed on a similar charge in 1998 and detained until the conviction was quashed in 2004 – suggests a lack of originality characteristic of the prime minister. The case turns on the testimony of the alleged victim and DNA evidence produced by the prosecution. Defence lawyers suggested this week that Anwar's accuser was a "compulsive and consummate liar" who may have been put up to it. Yet the trial judge has already declared the prosecution's evidence "reliable" and credible", leading Anwar to claim he is being denied a fair trial.
Najib gives every appearance of preparing for snap polls on the assumption that Anwar will be out of the way and the opposition decapitated. He told Umno's annual congress to prepare for battle because "the time is near" and urged delegates to work harder, for example by using social media, to attract a "new generation of Malaysians who are more critical and have rising expectations of the government". The party must adapt or face "tragedy", he warned.
To Najib's evident alarm, that tragedy almost occurred in July when tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets of Kuala Lumpur. The highly unusual public display of discontent was spurred by a range of factors: spending cuts, official corruption and cronyism, a defective electoral system, curbs on public assembly and debate, and state-imposed censorship considered draconian even by regional standards. The example of recent political upheavals in neighbouring Thailand and Singapore also played a part. In response, thousands were beaten and detained by police.
Now Najib is taking no chances as his lieutenants warn that Anwar is fomenting an Arab spring-style uprising – a so-called "hibiscus revolution". Having more or less reneged on shaky, post-July promises of civil rights reform, Najib is now pushing through remodelled restrictions in the form of the Peaceful Assembly act.
The act effectively makes peaceful assembly impossible by restricting it to undefined "designated places". No gatherings are permitted within 50 meters of prohibited places including hospitals, schools or places of worship. The police can dictate the date, time and place. Najib's idea of engaging the "new generation" of young Malaysians is to ban anyone under the age of 21 from organising a protest.
Opposition parties, lawyers and activist groups have condemned the new law, as has Amnesty International. But Khairy Jamaluddin, Umno's youth-wing leader, articulated Najib's paranoia last month when he accused Anwar's coalition of "trying hard to manufacture panic and disorder" by promoting street rallies instead of elections. "The opposition often quotes social movements in the Middle East to instigate people to take part in street revolutions and in the process manufacture a Malaysian version of the Arab spring," Khairy said.
Najib's authoritarian tendencies, blatant political scaremongering, and the judicial travesty that is Anwar's trial all suggest Malaysia's western allies, including Britain and the US, should take a closer look at their friend. Malaysia is valued as a trading partner, counterproliferation collaborator, and noncombatant member of the Afghanistan coalition. But the government's human rights record and democratic practices merit closer scrutiny.
In a visit last year, US secretary of state Hillary Clinton extracted a promise that Anwar would receive a fair trial. "The US believes it is important for all aspects of the case to be conducted fairly and transparently and in a way that increases confidence in the rule of law in Malaysia," she said. In a recent speech, Clinton urged all states to end discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation.
As Anwar's ordeal approaches an ugly climax, it seems increasingly unlikely that these benchmarks will be met. The next question is: what will Malaysians and their friends do about it?
• This article was amended on 14 December 2011. It originally referred to Umno's youth-wing leader as Najib Khairy Jamaluddin. This has now been corrected

Rules for royal succession

 The Star
REFLECTING ON THE LAW By SHAD SALEEM FARUQI

For the first time in royal history, a reigning Sultan ascended the Federal throne the second time. The Sultan of Kedah had previously reigned as Yang di-Pertuan Agong from 1970 to 1975.

YESTERDAY, the distinguished reign of the Sultan of Terengganu as the 13th Yang di-Pertuan Agong came to an end and the Sultan of Kedah ascended to the Federal throne.

This draws our attention to the unique rules relating to the election of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and Timbalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong as found in Articles 32, 33, 38(2) and the Third Schedule of the Federal Constitution.

The rules are exceedingly complex and constitutional conventions have added to their richness. The salient features are as follows:

> Only the Rulers of the nine Malay states are eligible to contest or vote. The Governors of Penang, Malacca, Sabah and Sarawak are excluded.

> Voting is by secret ballot and a simple majority of five out of nine Sultans is needed to disqualify or elect a Ruler.

> Seniority (by reference to date of accession to the state throne) carries some weight but is not an overriding factor.

> Election is on a rotational basis to ensure that every Ruler (who is willing and suitable) has had an opportunity to become the Yang di-Pertuan Agong before any state occupies the Federal throne twice.

> A Yang di-Pertuan Agong cannot be re-elected to continue beyond his five-year term.

Exceptions to rotation rule: Under the Third Schedule, a Ruler is qualified to be elected Yang di-Pertuan Agong except in three circumstances.

First, if he is a minor. Second, if he has notified the Keeper of the Rulers’ Seal that he does not desire to be elected.

In 1957 the Sultan of Johor, in 1970 the Sultan of Pahang and in 1975 the Sultan of Johor stood down in favour of the next eligible Ruler. In such a case, the state’s name goes to the end of the “Election List” and the next Ruler in line is offered the post.

Third, if at least five members of the Conference of Rulers have by secret ballot resolved that a Ruler is unsuitable by reason of infirmity of mind or body or for any other cause to exercise the functions of the King.

There is no verifiable record of any such resolution though it is rumoured that there was at least one such precedent.

First election: For the first election of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in 1957, an “Election List” was drawn up to indicate the seniority or precedence that Their Highnesses recognised among themselves. In his book, the late Lord President Tun Suffian Hashim informs us that the list had this precedence: Johor, Pahang, Negri Sembilan, Selangor, Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan, Terengganu and Perak.

Though Johor and Pahang were high up on the List, the Federal throne was offered by the Conference of Rulers to Negri Sembilan. Johor had declined and perhaps this was also the case with Pahang.

Second to ninth elections: The Election List drawn up for the first election is not permanent and is subject to constant revision in accordance with Section 4 of the Third Schedule which provides that the state that contributed the previous Yang di-Pertuan Agong should be transferred to the bottom of the list.

The state whose Ruler is elected as the current Yang di-Pertuan Agong should be omitted.

Whenever a Ruler dies or abdicates and there is a change in the Ruler of a State, then, due to the juniority of the new Ruler, his State’s name should be transferred to the end of the list.

For example, in 1958 the Sultan of Kedah and in 1959 the Sultan of Johor breathed their last. Their states were placed on the last rung of the Federal succession ladder.

If a Ruler declines or is disqualified, his State is moved to the bottom of the list. This is what happened to Johor and Pahang in 1957.

The above rules governed all elections till April 25, 1994, when the ninth Yang di-Pertuan Agong completed his term of office and the first rotation among the Sultans was completed.

Under section 4(3) of the Third Schedule new rules and a new election list took over.

Tenth and subsequent elections: When all states have taken their turn to grace the office of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the election list is then reconstituted in accordance with section 4(3) of the Third Schedule.

States are placed in the order in which their Rulers have occupied the office of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

The Malaysian Kings thus far:

1. Yang DiPertuan Besar of Negri Sembilan: Aug. 3, 1957 to April 1, 1960 (died in office).

2. Sultan of Selangor: April 14, 1960 to Sept 1, 1960 (died in office).

3. Raja of Perlis: Sept 21, 1960 to Sept 20, 1965.

4. Sultan of Terengganu: Sept 21, 1965 to Sept 20, 1970.

5. Sultan of Kedah: Sept 21, 1970 to Sept 20, 1975.

6. Sultan of Kelantan: Sept 21, 1975 to March 30, 1979 (died in office).

7. Sultan of Pahang: April 26, 1979 to April 25, 1984.

8. Sultan of Johor: April 26, 1984 to April 25, 1989.

9. Sultan of Perak: April 26, 1989 to April 25, 1994.

10. Yang DiPertuan Besar of Negri Sembilan: April 26, 1994 to April 25, 1999.

11. Sultan of Selangor: April 26, 1999 to Nov 21, 2001 (died in office).

12. Raja of Perlis: Dec 13, 2001 to Dec 12, 2006.

13. Sultan of Terengganu: Dec 13, 2006 to Dec 12, 2011.

14. Sultan of Kedah: Dec 13, 2011.

Unique features: In an age of egalitarianism and democracy, one would have expected monarchies to wither away. But they remain robust and popular and are symbols of stability, continuity and national unity in many lands including Belgium, Brunei, Denmark, Japan, Cambodia, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

The Malaysian monarchy is rather unique because of multiplicity of sovereigns at the state level and the elective and short-term nature of the royal position at the Federal level.

Another remarkable feature is that a time lapse is allowed between the end of one reign and the commencement of another.

In England, the rule is that “the monarch never dies”. On the death, removal or abdication of one monarch, the successor assumes office retrospectively to the date on which the vacancy arose.

This is not so in Malaysia where twice in 1960, once in 1979 and again in 2001, on the death of the Federal sovereign, the new sovereign’s reign commenced a few weeks after the vacancy arose.

Perhaps this is because the Constitution provides for a Timbalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong to fill the breach temporarily till a new election is held.

On the creation of a vacancy, the Deputy King does not automatically ascend to the throne. His term is tied up with the tenure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Under Article 33(3), if the post of the King falls vacant, the Timbalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong acts on his behalf till the office of the King is filled, at which time the Deputy King’s term expires as well.

Yesterday was a unique moment in our royal history. A reigning Sultan, the Sultan of Kedah, ascended the Federal throne a second time, the first being from 1970 to 1975. May all blessings be with our new King and his consort.

Shad Saleem Faruqi is Emeritus Professor of Law at UiTM and Visiting Professor at USM.

SBPA Formulated After Considering Various Quarters - Public Service Director-General

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 15 (Bernama) -- A lot of thought went into the formulation of the New Remuneration Scheme for Civil Servants (SBPA), which includes taking into consideration the views of various quarters including the civil servants.

Public Service Director-General Tan Sri Abu Bakar Abdullah said among the platforms for consulation were public service association representatives, Departmental Joint Councils (MBJ) and National Joint Councils (MBK).

"We also took into account the experience and problems of civil servants at the agency level, which includes maximum salary, promotions and grade...we studied all these.

"The Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak) announced this when tabling the 2012 Budget in October. It is now December, so the new option papers will be distributed after careful assessment," he said during the dialogue programme broadcast on RTM1 Wednesday night.

Abu Bakar, who was a guest on the live show, said this when asked to respond to a question posed on Facebook from Ibrahim Busu who felt that the scheme was introduced hastily without having adequate consultation.

He said the SBPA was introduced as the first move under the Main Retirement Plan aimed at improving the public sector.

On worries over poor appraisal under the SBPA, Abu Bakar said the government had assured civil servants that no one would be victimised and those whose performance fell below 69 per cent would be re-evaluated by a panel.

"The panel will examine whether the below 69 per cent score in 2012 is consistent with previous years' achievement.

"If the performance is consistent, the public servant is without doubt an under performer. But if that is the first time he is under-evaluated, the panel will make a specific study and make recommendations.

"Among others, if lower marks were received the following year due to personal problems, we will provide counselling first. If the civil servant concerned is not suited to his job, we can transfer him to another position," he said.

He said if the panel found that the assessment made by the employee's superior was unfair, a new appraiser would be appointed to rate his performance again.

The performance evaluation of civil servants will only start next year after civil servants opt for the SBPA, he added.

On the notion that the SBPA will retard promotion, Abu Bakar said the lateral entry policy or direct appointment and cross-linking with government-linked companies was aimed at enticing experts to join the civil service without affecting civil servants' promotion opportunities.

"This policy is being introduced to keep pace with the government policy on returning experts as the government found that many Malaysian citizens working abroad have specific expertise.

"Their participation in the civil service is not to grab management opportunities. If an expert is needed, there is no problem for us to create a position for him without denying opportunities of those in the service," he said.

Abu Bakr also stressed that the inclusion of experts from outside the service was the last resort if no experts could be found in the civil service itself.

He did not rule out the possibility of abolishing 29,000 positions due to the restructuring of the civil service but this would not cause any civil servants to be expelled or forced to take an early retirement.

However, he said the move would not result in the dismissal or retirement of any civil servant.

"What happens is that after posts are restructured following the SBPA, we find that there are many which are obselete such as machine operator, file seeker and they haven't been filled for quite some time. It's time to do away with these posts," he said.

The new scheme will be effective on Jan 1, 2012 and civil servants will be given the option to take the scheme or otherwise.

Forms for the new scheme will be distributed starting Thursday.

Living under siege part III: Ahmadiyah, a Renaissance view

Organisers remove death threats against 'anti-Islam' activists

• 

• A screen grab shows the death threats published on the '23December.com' underlined in red. Organisers have removed the slogans, which called for the "killing" of "those who challenge and oppose Islam", from the website.

Organisers of the mass protest scheduled for December 23 have removed slogans calling for the "killing" of "those who challenge and oppose Islam" on its promotional website lunched last evening.

The slogans on the website include "the ruling of those who break the laws and challenge Islam is killing them by the public", "today's law is to kill anti-Islam activists… and those who support them" and "ready to kill anyone who challenge the religion of Islam without regarding his party".

The slogans have now been removed.

Abdulla Mohamed, from the organisers, said the slogans were published by mistake.

"The slogans were sent to us by the participants of the protest and we uploaded them to the website without properly reading," he said.

"We corrected the mistake just after we found it."

Police spokesperson, Sub-inspector Ahmed Shiyam said the police received reports about the slogans but did not confirm whether they are investigating the case.

Press Secretary at the President's Office Mohamed Zuhair expressed concerns over the slogans.

"Citizens calling for the killing of fellow citizens is a matter of concern," he said.

"It will be a huge atrocity and a dishonour to the Maldivian scholars."

Zuhair dismissed the claims made by the organisers that the slogans were published by mistake.

"I don't think it was a mistake," he said.

"We believe it's an objective of the protest. Calling for such an action is unacceptable under Maldivian law or any other international practice."

The religious conservative Adhaalath Party President Imran Mohamed launched the website last evening.

Four years after ISA arrest, Uthaya says 'no regrets'

The Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) co-founder P Uthayakumar said he has no regrets over actions taken, leading to his arrest under the Internal Security Act (ISA) on Dec 13, 2007.

“We have no regrets over Hindraf’s 18-point-demands struggle focused on the Indian poor.

“We have no regrets fighting against the might and tyranny of the Umno state-sponsored racism that segregates and excludes the Indian poor from the national mainstream development of 1Malay-sia [sic].

“And also against racism in the 60 percent towkay (Chinese capitalist)-controlled corporate, banking, industrial and private sectors,” said Uthayakumar (left) in a statement today.

He singled out Umno as the main foe of Hindraf, for it had allegedly wanted to punish the movement and its leaders at “all and any costs” over the its rally on Nov 25, 2007.

“(The rally had succeeded) in ‘naming and shaming’ and exposing Malaysia’s Umno-racism [sic] for the first time at international fora,” he said.

Hindraf was founded by Uthayakumar and his brother Waytha Moorthy, who as lawyers, took up legal cases concerning religious conversions involving Hindus and cases involving demolition of Hindu temples.

Indian poor 'far more critical'

Waytha Moorthy went into exile before the rally as it was increasingly clear that Hindraf leaders would be nabbed, while Uthayakumar and four others were detained for more than a year under the ISA.

The four are lawyers M Manoharan, R Kenghadharan (right), V Ganabatirau and businessman T Vasanthakumar.
Uthayakumar was detained the longest at 514 days.

He said Hindraf does not regret its mono-ethnic cause because the situation with the ethnic Indian poor is far more critical compared to other ethnic groups.

“Our critics tell us that there are also the Malay and Chinese poor. Our answer is we also have the poor Jews.

“But here we are talking about the magnitude of the critical Indian poor problems, to the point of being driven to contemplate or to commit suicide."

Uthayakumar argued that the unlike the bumiputera poor, some of who have traditional villages and ancestral land as their social safety net, Indian Malaysians do not.

He said there is an advantageous situation among Chinese Malaysians who have 617 ‘new villages’ as a safety net.

Struggle for Indians to stay afloat

He argued that the bumiputera and Chinese poor with land could live off the land.

“But for the Indian poor the only way out of their daily misery arising from poverty and inequality is to contemplate if not to commit suicide.

“Note that the Indian poor suicide rate arising out of poverty has been recorded to be 600 percent above that in the Malay community."

Uthayakumar claimed that both BN and Pakatan Rakyat do not care about the Indian poor because it was not politically rewarding to do so, and thus Hindraf’s struggle must continue.

“Unlike the other communities, we in the Human Rights Party and Hindraf have never demanded any special privileges or supremacy. We are merely fighting to stay ... above the waters and fighting not to be pushed below the waters.

“In the interim we await the day biracial 1 Malay-sia [sic] would truly turn out to be 1Malaysia in the true sense of the word like in the Western civil societies.

“Where the poor Indians, Malays, Orang Asli, Kadazan, Iban, Bajau, Penan, Orang Ulu are all treated alike equally, granted equal opportunities, treated with respect, dignity and with humanity and all live in harmony like one big family."

As Sodomy II draws to close, Anwar predicts polls soon after

Anwar also said today he was using his trial to address the country’s flawed legal system. — Reuters pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 13 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today predicted that the general election would be held soon after his sodomy trial ends, saying that it was part of an elaborate plan to end his political career.
The Opposition leader told reporters that he was “prepared for the best, but expected the worst” when asked what he thought the judge’s verdict would be on his case.
“This is not coincidental, that the end of the case is going to coincide with (general) elections,” he said.
Responding to the prosecution’s closing submissions attacking his decision to testify via a statement from the dock, Anwar said he was using his trial to address the country’s flawed legal system.
“The system is flawed. It is why I issued a statement from the dock.
“It is not true that I have not adduced evidence to argue my case. I took a position through competent witnesses ... their only attempt is to demolish internationally-renowned doctors,” said Anwar, referring to foreign experts brought in by defence lawyers as witnesses for the case.
Complainant and star prosecution witness Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan has accused Anwar of sodomising him at the upmarket Desa Damansara Condominium in Damansara Heights here on June 26, 2008.
But the PKR de facto leader has repeatedly denied this, and opened his defence case by calling the sodomy charge a trumped-up allegation masterminded by Najib.
The former deputy prime minister said Najib wanted to end his political career and scupper Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) bid to take over federal government.
The trial resumes on December 15 with the defence replying to the prosecution’s submissions.
Trial judge Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah will then decide a date to deliver his decision on the case.

Has Rama become too big for his britches?

To stir controversy and not know how to douse it is only going to create problems for the DCM II and DAP.

COMMENT

The on-going altercation between DAP national chairman Karpal Singh and Penang Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy serves as a costly lesson for both the party and the latter.
Ramasamy has been in the spotlight the past week for making a premature announcement in Tamil daily Makkal Osai on Nov 28 on party’s Indian candidates for the 13th general election.
This prompted the 71-year-old Karpal to chastise Ramasamy, who is also DAP’s national deputy secretary-general, for behaving like a warlord by promising seats for candidates of his choice.
Ramasamy, also the Penang DAP deputy chief, responded by calling the party to get rid of godfathers, in an obvious reference to Karpal.
Many party leaders and members felt Ramasamy’s godfather remark had undermined party elders such as Dr Chen Man Hin, Lim Kit Siang and Karpal.
While Karpal and Ramasamy are embroiled in a war of words, DAP’s arch enemy, Umno, is grabbing the opportunity to impress upon the rakyat, Penangites in particular, that the current internal crisis facing DAP is proof that unity is an asset this party cannot claim to have.
With Umno loyalists wasting no time scurrying about painting a bad picture of DAP, the rift between Karpal and Ramasamy needs urgent repair.
Karpal, once dubbed the “Tiger of Jelutong”, has been with DAP through thick and thin.
A former detainee under the now-defunct Internal Security Act (ISA), his affection for DAP is understandable and so is his anger towards Ramasamy for branding DAP veterans “godfathers” or “warlords”.
Ramasamy, an academician-turned politician, has miles to walk in politics. Perhaps it was his arrogance as DCM II that resulted in him making those remarks, which have backfired on him.
The no-nonsense Karpal give Ramasamy an ultimatum – either apologise or face the music for misbehaving. On Dec 11, at the Penang DAP convention, Karpal cautioned Ramasamy not to let power get to the former lecturer’s head.
The ferocious lawyer also demanded Ramasamy immediately retract and apologise for his godfather remark against the party’s veteran leaders, especially him.
Reminding Ramasamy that the position of DCM II was an honour to ethnic Indian community, Karpal said it was thanks to DAP that Ramasamy won in the 2008 general election.
Ramasamy has lots to learn as a politician
The incident brings with it hard lessons for Ramasamy who quit his lecturing job in Singapore to venture into politics. To stir controversy and not know how to douse it is only going to create problems for both him and the party.
Having labelled Karpal and the other veterans of DAP as “godfathers”, Ramasamy has given the impression that the party operates along the lines of “mafia-ism”, something which Karpal said was unthinkable as DAP is a party for all races.
If at all DAP works ala “mafia”, when really did Ramasamy realise this? Where did he gain the conviction that the very party which gave him his political break is all about mafia?
What about the sacrifices of veterans like Karpal and Lim Kit Siang? Do they amount to nothing?
Or has this DCM II become “too big for his shoes”, ambitiously confident about his future in politics?
Perhaps it has… for Ramasamy said he was willing to quit DAP if necessary and return to his hometown in Sitiawan.
Karpal is furious, too, that Ramasamy, with his announcement on party candidatures, had trespassed all party decorum, as it was seen as usurping the power of the central executive committee.
Ramasamy was also taken to task for promoting an unknown individual, lawyer K Mangaleswari, as a candidate for the Jawi state constituency.
Umno’s gain?
As it stands, Umno supporters in Penang have accused state Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng of performing poorly as a leader, so much so that they had the cheek to send him birthday cakes resembling human excreta.
Now, with the on-going spat between Karpal and Ramasamy, all these Umno opportunists need is to brainwash the people into believing that DAP is crumbling.
To MIC central committee member KP Samy, who also leads a group of former Hindraf leaders, the feud reflects the weaknesses of the Indian leaders in Pakatan Rakyat, the opposition coalition representing PKR, DAP and PAS.
Samy claimed that Pakatan won the support of the Indian voters thanks to the efforts of Hindraf but post-2008, nothing had been done to help the Indian community.
“Can they quantify as to what they had done for the community? They should put forth a detailed manifesto of their guarantees to the community in the next general election,” said Samy.
More tongues have started wagging over DAP’s ability to serve the rakyat. Something has to be done soon to get the message across that the party in no way tolerates saboteurs while Ramasamy must not forget that “biting the hand that feeds it” will bring severe repercussions.
One such example was how Karpal refused Guan Eng’s effort in getting both Karpal and Ramasamy to shake hands as a show of easing the feud.
“I can forgive but I can’t forget… because of his insult of party veterans with his godfather remark,” Karpal said later.
Jeswan Kaur is a freelance writer and a FMT columnist.

Dr M: Just say sorry, Ramasamy

All Karpal is asking for is an apology, the former Umno boss said.

SERI KEMBANGAN: In a strange twist of events, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad advised DAP leader P Ramasamy to apologise to his chief, Karpal Singh.

Referring to Karpal as “the godfather of DAP”, the former Umno president wondered if the spat between the two DAP men was nothing more than political drama.

“I don’t know if it is not sandiwara (drama), but we all know that the godfather of the DAP is Karpal Singh.”

“Everybody knows that Karpal is the godfather, and you have to be nice to him. If you insult him, you must apologise,” he told reporters at a press conference.

He said this after officiating at the Sailing the Sand of Sahara event at the Palace of the Golden Horses.

Mahathir was referring to the ongoing spat between DAP deputy secretary-general Ramasamy and DAP chairman Karpal.

Ramasamy was first thrust into the spotlight for reportedly making a premature announcement on Nov 28 about the party’s Indian candidates in the coming general election.

Karpal then accused Ramasamy of acting like a party warlord by promising seats to DAP candidates of his choice.

Annoyed, Ramasamy said that the party needed to get rid of its godfathers, apparently referring to Karpal.

Since then, DAP leaders have called on Ramasamy to apologise, with the latter claiming that he was ready to quit the party.

Though not mentioning Ramasamy by name, Mahathir said that all Karpal had been asking for, was for the former to apologise.

“He’s (Karpal) not asking for anything. He’s just asking for an apology. Just say I’m sorry,” he said.

Rayer and gang the real traitors, says Indian NGO

“They declined to take an Indian exco seat when Guan Eng offered it in 2008.”

KUALA LUMPUR: A NGO representing Indian students has joined the DAP fracas over godfathers and warlords, branding a couple of Penang state assemblymen as traitors to the cause of Malaysian Indians.

The Malaysian Tamil Students’ Progressive Association (Matsap) said today that assemblymen RS Nethaji Rayer (Seri Delima) and A Tanasekharan (Bagan Dalam) were not fit to criticise Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy since they had refused to sit on the Penang executive council when Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng offered them the position in 2008.

“They are Indian traitors,” said Matsap’s secretary general, A Kalaimughilan.

He also did not spare DAP chairman Karpal Singh’s son Jagdeep Singh Deo, who is the state assemblyman for Dato Keramat.

“Most of the senior DAP leaders know that Lim initially offered two exco posts to Indian representatives in the state,” he said. “One was taken up by Ramasamy. The next slot was offered to Jagdeep.

“But I learnt that he refused, giving the excuse that he needed to take care of his family’s legal firm.

“Then the ball was passed to Rayer. He too gave the same excuse. Then, finally, the ball went into Thanasekharan’s court, the only other Indian rep from DAP. But he kicked the ball back to Lim, asking him to decide on the matter.”

Kalaimughilan said this was “clear evidence” that the three placed their personal interests above the Indian community’s interest.

Kalaimughilan said it was out of respect for the three as “fellow Indians” that he had kept silent over the matter for more than three years.

“But the moment they start attacking a respectable academician like Prof Ramasamy in public, I have a duty to tell the public that these men are not fit to criticise him.

“It was because of them that the Indian community was deprived of another exco post. In politics, you must grab every opportunity to fight for the community’s interest.

“I’m not a racist, but when a Chinese leader offers you an exco post even when you didn’t demand it and you refuse it, you’re clearly insulting not only the Indians but Lim as well.”

Kalaimughilan urged Penang DAP to choose Indian leaders who are fully committed to politics as candidates in the coming general election and not those who give a higher priority to their personal careers.

He also called on the DAP leadership to allow Ramasamy to continue with his job. “His service is still needed by the Penang Indians,” he said.

Brothers arrested under EO despite being acquitted

Even though the EO will cease to exist in six months' time, police are still using it to detain two brothers.

KUALA LUMPUR: The Emergency Ordinance (EO) will be repealed in six months but police are still bent on using it as they have detained two brothers without trial.

The Alternative Action Team (AAT) submitted a memorandum to Suhakam, on behalf of a family from Ipoh claiming that the police had abused their powers by wrongfully detaining two of their family members under the EO.

AAT president B Kalaivanar said the brothers – S Murugan, 31, and S Ramakrishnan, 28 – were detained at their home in Batu Gajah in January over a murder case.

When taken to court, the siblings, who do odd jobs for a living, were acquitted of the charges.
“However, the police rearrested the duo on the spot for another murder case,” said Kalaivanar.

Subsequently, the duo were detained under the EO for 60 days at the Bagan Serai police station before being transferred to the Machang detention centre in March.

Criticising the police, Kalaivanar alleged that the police threw various accusations at the brothers just to justify their abuse of power in detaining them.

“They were accused of committing a murder in Batu Gajah and being involved in a jewellery shop heist. They were even accused of stealing a cow,” he said.

Main breadwinners

Kalaivanar urged the police to charge the duo in court so that Ramakrishnan and Murugan can get a trial to prove their innocence.

“While we have Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak revoking archaic laws such as the EO, the police seem to be bent on using it,” said Kalaivanar.

On the jewellery store robbery claims, Kalaivanar said that it was not necessary for the police to use the EO to arrest the duo as CCTV recording at the shop could lead them to the real culprit.

Suhakam commissioner Muhammad Shaani Abdullah promised to look into the matter, but reminded the family that the EO would only cease to exist in six months’ time.

“However, Suhakam is always against detention without trial. Everyone deserves a fair trial and we will check with the Home Ministry on this case,” he said.

Meanwhile, the detainees’ brother, S Prakash, 29, believed that his brothers are innocent and hoped the authorities would release them soon.

“It’s very hard for us now as they were our main breadwinners. Our father is also too old to go through all this,” said Prakash.

Press Release: Malaysian Bar Urges the Malaysian Government to Accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court without Delay

The 10th Assembly of State Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court opened at the United Nations in New York City on 12 December 2011.  Both the Malaysian Government and Malaysian civil society (represented by the Malaysian Bar), will attend these meetings.

Malaysia participated in the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court in Rome in 1998.  It was also a signatory to the Final Act of the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court.  However, it has yet to become a State Party to the Rome Statute.

In March 2011, the Malaysian Government announced its intention to accede to the Rome Statute.

The events leading up to this announcement were encouraging.  On 27-28 May 2010, the Malaysian Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Dato’ Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz, made a promise at the Kampala meeting of the Parliamentarians for Global Action to submit the accession papers to the Rome Statute to the Malaysian Cabinet upon his return from that meeting.

Then on 7 June 2010, all members of the Dewan Rakyat, the lower house of the Malaysian Parliament, unanimously supported a series of 15 motions in the aftermath of Israel’s attack on the fleet of ships carrying humanitarian aid bound for Gaza.  Two of the motions are of particular relevance:

Motion 5: calling on like-minded countries to bring a resolution to the United Nations Security Council to refer Israel’s attack (on the aid ship) to the International Criminal Court.

Motion 7: proposing that Turkey consider action under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Then in February 2011, the Malaysian Parliament played host to a two-day Asia-Pacific Regional Consultation on the Universality of the International Criminal Court.  This was organised by the Parliamentarians for Global Action.  The Consultation brought together parliamentarians from Bangladesh, Indonesia, the Maldives, New Zealand, the Philippines, Vanuatu and Malaysia.  It was also attended by the Speaker of the Parliament of Kiribati, the Attorney-General of the Maldives, and additional participants from Ireland, Italy, South Korea, the Netherlands and Malaysia.  The keynote address of the Consultation was given by the guest of honour, H.E. Judge Sang-Hyun Song, the President of the International Criminal Court.

The Malaysian Bar was pleased to have participated in this Consultation.  The Malaysian Bar, together with the Malaysian Coalition for the International Criminal Court, has been involved in the campaign to persuade the Malaysian Government to accede to the Rome Statute since 2006.  This would be consistent with Malaysia’s membership in the United Nations Human Rights Council, which is responsible for upholding the highest possible standards in the promotion and protection of human rights.  The Malaysian Government should honour its promises and pledges to meet those standards when it sought and obtained re-election to the Human Rights Council in 2010.

What is interesting is that three of the countries that participated in that Consultation have since gone on to become State Parties to the Rome Statute.  On 23 August 2011, the Senate of the Republic of the Philippines passed SRN546, concurring in the ratification of the Rome Statute.  On 30 August 2011 it deposited its instrument of accession.  On 14 June 2011, the Parliament of the Maldives voted to accede to the Rome Statute.  On 21 September 2011, it deposited its instrument of accession.  On 2 December 2011, Vanuatu deposited its instrument of accession.

The speed in which these countries have commenced and completed the process of accession to the Rome Statute, especially that of the Maldives, is exemplary and is to be applauded.  This is to be compared and contrasted with that of Malaysia.

Although it hosted the Consultation in February 2011, and announced in March 2011 its intention to accede to the Rome Statute, the Malaysian Government has still not deposited its instrument of accession.  The oft-given and oft-repeated reason for this is that the Malaysian Government wishes to ensure that implementing legislation is in place and that its other domestic legislation is in accord with the requirements of the Rome Statute before it will actually accede to the Rome Statute.

Some of the issues it has raised pertain to compatibility with Syariah law, the position of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the constitutional Supreme Head of State of Malaysia, and the existence of the death penalty in Malaysia.  No time-frame for any implementing legislation has been announced.  Indeed, the particular division of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs tasked with drafting the implementing legislation has been disbanded and its responsibilities transferred to other divisions.  

One has only to look at countries like Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Chad, Jordan, Maldives, and Tunisia to see that countries with a predominantly Muslim environment have been able to accede to the Rome Statute.  Further, one has only to look at Australia, Belgium, Cambodia, Canada, Denmark, Japan, Jordan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom to see that countries with a constitutional monarchical system of government have also been able to accede to the Rome Statute.  The Malaysian Government need only consult with the governments of these nations to understand how concerns about the Syariah and the constitutional monarchy have been addressed.  

The Malaysian Bar is of the view that it is not a pre-requisite and neither is there a necessity for domestic implementing legislation to be in place prior to a country acceding to the Rome Statute.  In order to identify immediately with the goal to end impunity for crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes, it is more important for countries to accede to the Rome Statute as quickly as possible.  Thereafter, work can progressively be undertaken to bring domestic legislation into compliance with the requirements of the Rome Statute, and for the introduction of implementing legislation.

The Malaysian Bar wholeheartedly concurs with Malaysian Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Dato’ Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz, that joining the International Criminal Court would not threaten or compromise Malaysia’s sovereignty.  The fact that the International Criminal Court operates on a principle of complementarity means that the international jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court is carefully balanced with the jurisdiction of the Malaysian courts.  

In order for the international community to comprehensively address the issues of crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes and crimes of aggression, the support of all countries is important.  Malaysia, as a leading nation of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Commonwealth and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and as a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council, should pursue a course of action commensurate with the role that it seeks to play in these organisations and bodies.

As it stands, in the context of Southeast Asia, only Cambodia, the Philippines and Timor-Leste are members of the International Criminal Court.  Thailand signed (on 2 October 2000) the treaty that brought about the Rome Statute but has yet to accede.  As such, only these three countries will enjoy the right to nominate candidates to all the organs of the International Criminal Court, including the offices of judges, the Prosecutor and the Registrar.  We note that the Philippines, which has only recently become a State Party (on 1 November 2011), nominated a candidate to become a judge of the International Criminal Court from the Asia-Pacific region.  Their candidate was successfully elected yesterday, 12 December 2011.

The Malaysian Bar, and also on behalf of the Malaysian Coalition for the International Criminal Court, calls upon the government of the member states of the Rome Statute to continue their engagement with and encouragement to the Malaysian Government to expedite the depositing of the instrument of accession to the Rome Statute.  We also call on them to offer the relevant expertise to the Malaysian Government in its drafting and implementation of the necessary domestic legislative changes.

The Malaysian Bar, and also on behalf of the Malaysian Coalition for the International Criminal Court, calls upon the Malaysian Government not to delay any further and to deposit its instrument of accession to the Rome Statute immediately.

Lim Chee Wee

President

Malaysian Bar

New Reality Voters Will Determine 13 General Election Outcome - Saifuddin

SHAH ALAM, Dec 13 (Bernama) -- Umno supreme council member Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah has opined that the kingmakers in the 13th general election would be the group of "new reality voters".

Saifuddin, who is also Deputy Higher Education Minister, claimed neither the Barisan Nasional (BN) or Pakatan Rakyat comprising the DAP, PAS dan Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) had enough support to form the next government and were equally dependent on the group to give them the score.

In special a discourse entitled "PRU 13 Undi Siapa Jadi Penentu" (13GE - Whose votes will determine the outcome?) here today, he said the "new reality voters" comprised groups that used the new media not only to communicate, share and operate online but adopted it as a lifestyle.

"They form a loose network among themselves, yet are close-knitted, producing ideas or reasoning, and acting without concerns for bureaucracy," he said as a panellist at the discourse organised by the Sinar Harian newspaper.

Saifuddin said the "new reality voters" were also aware that politics and democracy go beyond elections or becoming a people's representative for the BN or Pakatan Rakyat and they wanted the involvement of the youth, workforce including professionals, media and university students in the process they perceived as democratic.

The lone BN panelist, and facing an audience of mostly opposition party supporters in the auditorium, Saifuddin maintained that BN still stood a good chance of winning the next general election.

He said from feedback, those who voted in protest against the BN in 2008 had "returned to the fold".

"I feel a majority of them have accepted that the BN is committed and serious in wanting to make changes, via government, economic and political transformation as initiated by the Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Razak)," he said.

The other panellists were DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng, PKR vice president Nurul Izzah Anwar, KITA party chief Datuk Zaid Ibrahim and senior lecturer at Universiti Malaya's Media and Social Science Studies Faculty, Associate Prof Dr Abu Hassan Hasbullah.

International Islamic University, Malaysia's Humanities and Revelation-based Knowledge Kulliyah Lecturer Dr Maszlee Malik acted as the moderator.

Lim said for Pakatan Rakyat, winning depended on their control of parliamentary seats in Sabah (25 constituencies) and Sarawak (31 constituencies).