Share |

Thursday, 29 July 2010

Sikh militants set up base in M'sia, says Punjab police

The ruthless Khalistan Liberation Force (KLF), a Sikh separatist group, is suspected to have set up base outside Kuala Lumpur, with at least four of its militants in hiding in Malaysia.
The KLF has set up a base in Malaysia to enable the four militants to canvass for support, claim the Punjab police.
The police said they obtained the "vital clue" on the KLF base in Malaysia following the arrest of a suspected miltant at a guest-house in Patiala district (Punjab) last Monday.
NONEThey said the 22-year-old man was linked to a series of bombings in the state, early this year, adding that he was suspected of planting bombs outside a LPG bottling plant in Nabha and the Halwara Air Force station in Punjab.
Intelligence reports reveal he fled to Malaysia, where he sought shelter from another wanted KLF militant who had been residing in Seremban for some time.
"The suspect was staying in Seremban for about a year. We are very much sure the KLF has set up a base in Malaysia because these boys (militants) are going there to get support.
"The suspect had travelled to Thailand by road and later flew to Pakistan to get arms training. Definitely, they are using Malaysia to carry out their activities," Patiala senior superintendent of police Ranbir Singh Khatra told Bernama when contacted by telephone today.
Last Monday's arrest, coupled with the discovery of 15kg RDX from another Sikh militant, of the Khalistan Zindabad Force on July 23, has left the police in a tizzy.
Intelligence agencies now suspect Sikh terrorists based outside Punjab were preparing to create mayhem in Delhi before the Commonwealth Games later this October.
Armed struggle
A recent Punjab police intelligence advisory further justified their anxiety: "Certain militants sitting abroad are desperate to push four Sikh extremists into India to carry out nefarious activities."
The KLF movement was started by Sikh hardliners who staged an armed struggle against the Indian government in the 1980s-1990s, seeking a separate Sikh homeland - to be called 'Khalistan'.
Although the group was crushed by Punjab police and later disintegrated, remnants of KLF members now operate from outside India, supported by foreign elements, to strike terror on Indian soil.
"We suspect, at least four more militants are still hiding in Malaysia. We will get the help of the Indian federal government, Interpol and the Indian Embassy in Kuala Lumpur to arrest them," said Khatra.
At the peak of its reign, the violent separatist movement hijacked the Srinagar-Delhi bound Indian Airlines flight to Lahore, Pakistan, with 255 passengers on board in 1984.
- Bernama

Six Indian victims still in jail after beaten by Malay mob & then by Malay-sian police & their 3 cars smashed up. Letter of appeal to High Court Judge for their release.

images
KUMAR HASHIMAH & CO No 6(A), Jalan Abdullah,
PEGUAMBELA & PEGUAMCARA Jalan Bangsar,
ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS 59000 Kuala Lumpur.
Tel : 03-2282 5622
Fax : 03-2282 5245
P. UTHAYAKUMAR. LL.B, CLP.
____________________________
9.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
Sat. & Sunday – Closed
Your Reference :
In Reply Please Quote : MSIC/JULY/2010
Date : 28/07/2010

Setiausaha kepada,
Yang Arif Dato Wira Mokhtaruddin bin Baki,
Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya di Shah Alam,
(Bahagian Jenayah)
Tingkat 3, Bangunan Mahkamah,
Sultan Salahuddin Abdul
Aziz Shah, Persiaran Pegawai, BY Fax 03-55190630
Seksyen 5, 40000 Shah Alam. BY E-Mail: mohtarudin@kehakiman.gov.my
Yang Arif,

Per: 1. Permohonan Rayuan Semakan terhadap Perintah Reman lima hari terhadap enam lapan orang oleh Makhamah Majistret Sepang
2. Anakguam dipukul dan dicederakan oleh sekumpulan 100 orang samseng Melayu dihadapan mata kepala pihak polis dan kemudian dipukl dan dicederakan oleh anggota polis di balai polis Sepang
3. Seorangpun kumpulan 100 orang tersebut tidak ditangkap polis walaupun tiga kereta anakguam juga dipecahkan dihadapan mata kepala pihak polis. DSC03281
Kami merujuk kepada perkara yang tersebut di atas dimana kami bertindak bagi pihak: –
1) Selvakumar (801006-05-5433)
2) Sivasoorian Thangavaloo (780111-05-5267)
3) Rashidi bin Abdul Ghani (870904-05-5709)
4) Vasanthan Marimuthu (840530-05-5351)
5) Devendran Pannirselvam (870315-05-5583)
6) Murugan Rengasamy (780614-05-5111)
Pada 26/07/2010 anakguam kami ini telah diperintahkan untuk telah ditahan reman selama lima (5) hari oleh Mahkamah Majistret Sepang.
Kami dengan ini dengan rendah diri membuat Rayuan Semakan ini menurut Seksyen 323 Kanun Acara Jenayah.
DSC03286 Fakta kes anakguam kami adalah menurut surat Human Rights Party bertarikh 26/07/2010 kepada YAB Perdana Menteri Malaysia, YAB Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Y.B Menteri Dalam Negeri yang bertarikh 26/07/2010 bertajuk “ Malay-sian police abets 100 violent malay mob against Indians in Sepang. Why no UMNO, KDN,IGP, AG and Home Minister’s action? No police protection for the Indians. Sesalinan surat ini dilampirkan bersama disini untuk rujukan senang pihak Mahkamah.
Kami dengan ini memohon untuk satu tarikh perbicaraan untuk Rayuan Semakan ini pada kadar segera dan jika dibenarkan pada sebelah petang hari ini juga bersamaan 28hb Julai 2010 terutamanya tetapi tidak terhadap kepada dengan terdapatnya laporan Polis No BBST No 2843/10 yang anakguam kami telah dipukul dengan teruk, tidak tahan sakit dan dicederakan oleh anggota-anggota polis dibalai polis Sepang.
Kami memohon maaf terhadap segala kesulitan yang timbul.
Budi-bicara kerjasama dan tindakan segera pihak Mahkamah dalam perkara ini disanjung tinggi. Uk 1
Sekian
Terima Kasih
Yang Benar,
s.k
1. Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail
Attorney General of Malaysia.
Aras 1-8, Block C3, Parcel C Fax: 88889369
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan Email: ag@agc.gov.my
62512 Putrajaya
2. Encik Mohd Azari bin Harun,
Ketua Unit Pendakwaan,
Pejabat Timbalan Pendakwaraya,
Negeri Selangor.
Tingkat 4, Podium Selatan,
Bangunan Sultan Salahuddin,
Abdul Aziz Shah,
40512 Shah Alam Fax: 03 – 5544 7971
3. Supt Zahedi bin Ayob
Ketua Polis Daerah Sepang
Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Sepang
Bandar Baru Salak Fax: 03 – 8706 8592
43900, Sepang Selangor Email: benayobzahedi@yahoo.com

Critics Blame French Gov't. for Aid Worker's Execution

pp
Multisource political news, world news, and entertainment news analysis by Newsy.com

PAS leader: Umno will pay 'cowhead' fines

By G Vinod and Teoh El Sen - Free Malaysia Today,

PETALING JAYA: PAS leader Khalid Samad is certain that Umno would be forking out the cash to settle the fines imposed on the “cowhead” protesters.

The Shah Alam MP was commenting on the Sessions Court's decision yesterday to let the majority of the protesters walk free with a slap on the wrist, which  many have criticised.

“I am sure the fines will be paid by their 'sponsor' which is Umno. These people are linked to Umno and they cannot run away from that.

“The fact is (Minister of Agriculture and Agro-based Industries) Noh Omar and (Home Minister) Hishammuddin Hussein were giving them support,” he told FMT.

"I think their (the protesters') action was extreme and the decision made by the court gives the  impression that it was not a serious offence,” he said.

Khalid also noted that the protesters did not show any remorse for their action after they were sentenced.

“This is contrary to the so-called spirit of 1Malaysia and the public should think whether the government is serious about improving national unity. I think that the seriousness of the attorney- general in taking the case was just not there,” he said.
'Put this episode behind us'
While most quarters were disappointed that the 12, who paraded with a severed cow's head  to protest against the contsruction of a Hindu temple in Shah Alam last year, were let off the hook,  one religious leader, however, said Malaysians should put the episode behind them.

“I believe the judiciary sent a message to all and we should put the matter to rest,” said Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) president Dr Thomas Phillips.

He added that although many were unhappy with the sentence, Malaysians should, however, accept it in good faith and move forward.

“We should no longer hold any grudges against them. These sort of provocations will not affect our overall understanding of one another as Malaysians are more matured now,” he said.

The 12 protesters were fined RM1,000 each for illegal assembly while two of them were fined an additional RM3,000. Another was jailed for a week.

In an immediate reaction, former Malaysian Hindu Sangam president A Vaithilingam had expressed disappointment over the light sentence.

Below are the comments from the rest:

Ramon Navaratnam, Centre for Public Policy Studies chairman:
I am disappointed at the weak sentence meted out by the court. Considering the gravity of the offence, which could have ignited serious ethnic disturbances, I consider this sentence inadequate.

I would say this warrants the maximum sentence, if not, much higher than that. We should have a more stringent and deterrent sentence so that it would send a message to all religious groups that such actions would not be tolerated.

Frankly, the public would be asking would the sentence commensurate with the crime if it was other ethnic groups involved.

P Uthayakumar, Human Rights party secretary-general:
Justice must not only be done but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.

In addition, the decision by the A-G's Chambers in not prosecuting the other four perpetrators for the act is not helping as well. I urged the attorney-general to appeal against the Sessions Court's sentence and further prosecute them under Section 298(A) as I believe this clause would have been used if it were the Muslims who were offended instead.

N Gobalakrishnan, PKR's Padang Serai MP:
The mild sentence is just another way of encouraging troublemakers to stir up more trouble in the country.The sentence is a blow to the nation's image and Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's 1Malaysia call.

Mutiny in Umno Youth, rebels bay for captain's blood

By Syed Jaymal Zahiid - Free Malaysia Today

KUALA LUMPUR: There is a movement growing in Umno Youth to put a halt to their chief Khairy Jamaluddin's influence. The guns are trained on the state Umno Youth chiefs aligned to the Oxford graduate and son-in-law of former premier Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

It is learnt that the movement, although nationwide, is strongest in three states – Selangor, Perak and Johor – where Umno Youth division leaders are piling the pressure on some of the states' top Youth leaders to quit.

In Selangor, some 14 Youth division chiefs have mounted an uprising against their state boss Mohd Suhaimi Ghazali, a Khairy ally.

The group is planning to submit a protest memorandum to Suhaimi demanding for his immediate resignation.

"He has not done anything to move the machinery here. The memorandum is a sign of protest against what is seen as Suhaimi's failure to act as an effective Youth leader in Selangor," a source told FMT.

Suhaimi's position has been the subject of much speculation. It is said that he tendered his resignation on July 1 after a fallout with Selangor Umno's de facto leader Noh Omar.

Several pro-Umno blogs recently reported that Suhaimi quit his post after Noh, in what appears to be a move to place his man for the job, accused the incumbent of being incompetent.

Noh was apparently upset that Suhaimi failed to effectively exploit the illegal sand mining issue against the Pakatan Rakyat-led state government.

Khairy's men unpopular

Party sources said Suhaimi's resignation came after he was informed of the memorandum calling for his resignation, which confirmed his and Khairy's unpopularity among grassroots leaders in the state.

"The problem with Khairy is that he placed his men for such posts when they do not enjoy support or are unpopular among the grassroots. He knows that he himself is not popular in Umno," said one source.

It is understood that Khairy has asked Suhaimi to reconsider his decision to quit. The latter has also been vague about his position.

Meanwhile, a similar scene is unravelling in Perak and Johor, with complaints mounting over the so-called “under-performance” of the respective state chiefs and committee members aligend to Khairy.

Party sources said the discontent and rumours of an uprising against Khairy's men are not new but these have intensified recently and Umno president and Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is well aware of it.

"Especially in Selangor. He (Najib) knows but what can he do?" said a Selangor Youth leader.

'Leave, or get kicked out'

Khairy clinched the Youth chief post in a tight contest, beating Mukhriz Mahathir, the son of powerful former premier Dr Mahathir Mohammad, and former Selangor mentri besar Dr Mohd Khir Toyo, a staunch supporter of Mahathir.

The 34-year-old politician had become an unpopular figure during the reign of his father-in-law and was largely blamed for Barisan Nasional's electoral debacle in 2008.

Breaking from tradition, Najib had twice excluded Khairy from his cabinet line up, breaking a long held tradition of giving the Umno Youth chief a ministerial portfolio.

The Umno president did this to contain the resentment towards Khairy and his father-in-law from overflowing and causing fissures in the party.

Sources said while Umno appears calm and united on the surface, internally, the bad blood towards Khairy and the Abdullah Ahmad Badawi camp flows strong.

“He will be forcefully ousted or Khairy will just have to accept the fact that he is not wanted,” said an Umno Youth leader, who declined to be named.

Despite several attempts, Khairy could not be reached for comments.

Allegations against DPP are serious ethical concerns


"It is definitely is an ethical matter, as prosecutions are done in the interest of justice. You are there to put your case before the court in the interest of justice. As there is no client here, there should be no relationship between prosecutor and complainant," he said.

PETALING JAYA (July 28, 2010): The allegations against Deputy Public Prosecutor Farah Azlina Latif are serious enough to warrant disciplinary action and should be investigated.

Speaking to theSun in a phone interview today, Malaysian Bar Council president Ragunath Kesavan said actions such as being romantically linked to a key witness in a prosecution are "ethical matters".

"It is definitely is an ethical matter, as prosecutions are done in the interest of justice. You are there to put your case before the court in the interest of justice. As there is no client here, there should be no relationship between prosecutor and complainant," he said.

Farah, who has been dropped from the prosecution team in the sodomy trial of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was allegedly romantically involved with the complainant in the trial, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

"Even in a private solicitor-client relationship, it is unethical as the issue of objectivity would be questioned. Will the solicitor be fair to the client. It is even more onerous in the case of a prosecutor," added Ragunath.

He said he supported her removal from the team and an investigation to determine whether the prosecution has been compromised and whether she had access to any information that would compromise the prosecution of the accused.

He added that a lawyer could be disbarred for such a relationship, but cautioned that certain factors have to be considered.

"Many factors have to be considered such as the extent of the relationship and the time it occurred- was it before, during or after the time the lawyer was handling the case.

The test when it comes to punishment is whether it affected his or her objectivity in handling the case," said Ragunath.

Anwar's counsel Sankara Nair accused Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail of skirting the issue when he announced that Farah had been dropped from the prosecution team and the division.

"He didn't confirm...I think the AG is skirting the issue as he has yet to reply to me formally. By taking this action, he is only fueling suspicions with regards to this matter," he said.

He had sent a letter to Solicitor-General II Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden on Monday to seek a confirmation of the information which first appeared on the Malaysia Today blog.

When asked if Anwar's defence team would move for a mistrial, Sankara declined to comment, but said it was an option.

"Under the law, Saiful cannot be given any advantage, and he should be treated like any other witness, because it is the public prosecutor who is prosecuting Anwar. He cannot access any information he is not allowed to have," he said.

Is the AG saying she did without saying she did?

FreeMalaysiaToday reports that the AG confirmed that ‘deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Farah Azlina Latif has been dropped from the prosecution team in the sodomy trial of former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim’ following upon RPK’s  allegation that Farah was inappropriately involved with star witness, Saiful.
Not only that, the AG also confirmed that for the same reason, Farah has been dropped altogether from the Prosecution Division of the Attorney-General’s Chambers.
He, however, insisted that she had been dropped not because she was guilty of the matter alleged, but to avert any negative public perception on the prosecution team.
However, in so explaining, the AG may have inadvertantly given away more than  he had intended or he might have wrongly cast aspersions on a young woman’s reputation.
Which is it?
“The Attorney-General’s Chambers cannot compromise on any issue that can tarnish the image or credibility of the department and we are looking at such matters very seriously. This can be very difficult for us but any personal matter, if it can have any implication in whatever form on the department, will be handled very seriously”, he is reported as saying.
Now, the action taken has all but ended any career prospects Farah may have had in the AG’s Chambers. We should not be at all surprised if, in the near future, we hear that she has resigned from the service.
Seen that way, if there was no truth to the allegation, one would have expected the AG to stand by his officer and not abandon her in what must surely be a difficult time for her.
One would have expected him to condemn the allegation as outright lies.
Which he has not done.
The AG’s chambers has instead taken very serious and drastic action, as they rightly should and, as the AG has said would be taken, where a personal matter of an officer implicates the department.
Does not this serious action, then, in itself, confirm that there was a personal matter involving the officer concerned, a matter of sufficient gravity to warrant the drastic action that has been taken?
In the absence of a fuller explanation from the AG as to what that ‘personal matter’ might be, would the public not be entitled to reason that there must have been truth in RPK’s allegation, even if not whole, at least in part?
If there is in fact no truth to the allegation, the DPP’s reputation should not be sullied by the natural inference to be drawn from the action that has been taken against her, without any further explanation.
On the other hand, if the personal matter does somehow involve the witness, has not the entire proceedings been irretrievably compromised?
After all, as the AG himself conceded, is it not public perception that is paramount?

THE FREE MARKET


1. A long time ago when I was Prime Minister I met President Bush the father, at Boston University where he was conferring degrees for graduates. I met him in a side room and I told him of the unfair anti-palm oil campaign by America, blaming it for heart diseases.

2. We later submitted palm oil samples for three American chemical laboratories to examine the cholesterol contents. Their findings proved that although palm oil had more cholesterol than rival soya bean oil, the main edible oil in America, cooking reduced palm oil cholesterol but increased the cholesterol in soya bean oil.

3. The campaign against palm oil stopped but Americans still refused to use palm oil for cooking to this day. It was a case of non-tariff barrier. But that is the way America deals with competitions.

4. When the Vietnamese exported catfish to America, American catfish producers got their Government to declare that Vietnamese catfish is not catfish. The catfish farmers in Vietnam lost their business.

5. Malaysia-made rubber gloves were banned in the United States because out of the hundreds of millions used, one person had allergic reaction.

6. Foreign aircraft manufacturers wishing to export to the United States have to use American components and do part of the finishing in America. It is the same with the automobile. The Japanese and the Koreans have to put up plants in the United States and employ American workers in order to remain in the United States market.

7. Despite all these conditions Toyota's share of the world auto market grew. Then news came that Toyota was on the verge of becoming the No 1 automotive manufacturer in the world, displacing General Motors of the United States.

8. American's pride was hurt. Soon something was found to fail in the hybrid Toyota "Prius". Apparently one American user from tens of thousands was hurt because the brakes failed.

9. The news about the Prius failure hit the headlines in the American controlled world media. Toyota was forced to recall tens of thousands of the Prius model. The losses were enormous.

10. In order to put Toyota in its proper place the head of Toyota Corporation was summoned to Washington to face a congressional enquiry.

11. Toyota's position as a possible biggest automobile manufacturer in the world has been eroded. But while American auto manufacturers have to be put under Chapter II, i.e. as bankrupts, Toyota is still showing profits. In time Toyota will become the biggest automobile company in the world, the faults with the Prius notwithstanding.

12. There really is no free market. If tariff and other barriers fail to stop imports, the application of sanctions against countries, whatever may be the reason is also another form of non-tariff barrier. Free trade simply does not exist.

13. Truly hypocrisy prevails in the markets and in international trade. The greatest hypocrites are the very people who conceive and promote the idea of tariff free world trade.

Malaysian Lawyer Dropped From Anwar Trial Over Affair Claim

From AFP

In a sensational twist in Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy trial, a prosecutor has been dropped after being accused of having an affair with the star witness.

Defence lawyers said the surprise move bolstered its claim that Anwar, a former deputy premier who was sacked and jailed on separate sex and corruption counts a decade ago, is the victim of a political conspiracy.

The prosecution said it was dropping Farah Azlina Latif from its team in the ongoing trial, following claims she was romantically involved with Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan, 25, who has accused Anwar of sodomising him.

“This can be very difficult for us but any personal matter, if it can have any implication in whatever form… will be handled very seriously,” attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail told state media late Tuesday.

“This move is also to ensure that the smooth running of the case is not affected,” the government’s top lawyer said, without specifying whether or not the claims were true.

An official at the attorney-general’s office confirmed his comments to AFP, and said that Farah Azlina would also be transferred to another department.

The defence said it had sought an official explanation from the prosecution after a leading Malaysian political blogger said on his website that the lawyer was in a sexual relationship with Saiful, who has a fiancee.

“The implications are serious,” Anwar’s lawyer Sankara Nair told AFP Wednesday.

“There is a perception that Saiful could have been given access to confidential information of the trial and that would compromise the integrity of the prosecution,” he said.

Sankara said the development strengthened claims that there was a conspiracy against Anwar, after Saiful testified that he met with high-profile individuals including Prime Minister Najib Razak before lodging his complaint.

The attorney-general however said that Farah Azlina, one of eight prosecutors in the Anwar case, had no access to confidential information.

The sodomy trial, which began in February and has been punctuated by lengthy delays, is set to resume on August 2 for a one-month session.

Saiful, who was an aide in Anwar’s office, has accused the 62-year-old of sodomising him in 2008. If convicted, Anwar could face up to 20 years imprisonment.

Sodomy, even among consenting adults, is illegal in Muslim-majority Malaysia.

Anwar has said he is the victim of a plot to prevent him from taking power, after the opposition made huge strides in 2008 elections, stunning the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition which has been in power for half a century.

India Cosies Up to Burma

Image(Asia Sentinel) Red carpet treatment in Delhi for Than Shwe

Some analysts say India's high profile welcome earlier this week of Burma's junta leader, Snr-Gen Than Shwe, may be an unspoken endorsement of his military regime's plans to hold national elections, but New Delhi is also fishing for benefits from the regime.

The Indian government, feting Than Shwe with top-level political and commerce meetings this week, faces a number of concerns that put Burma firmly on its agenda: the search for nearby energy sources, concerns about Chinese hegemony, transport links eastward and, perhaps most of importantly according to observers, rising rebel activity in India's northeast states.

Despite attempts by Western governments to promote isolation of the Burmese junta, New Delhi has been increasing its contacts. This follows a period of Indian petulance after New Delhi's disappointment at being usurped by China for the chance to purchase the 200 billion cubic meters of gas in Burma's still-to-be-developed Shwe offshore field in the Bay of Bengal.

Two Indian government-owned companies are part of the Shwe development consortium, led by South Korea's Daewoo International, and they had hoped to acquire much of the gas for export to India.

"Bilateral trade with Burma in general is small fry stuff for a burgeoning economy the size of India's, but it's more significant for the junta and it might benefit India's efforts to stop China from running away with more Burmese gas," said Collin Reynolds, an independent energy industries consultant in Bangkok.

"Only two blocks of the Shwe field are being developed so far, and it's highly likely that much more gas will be found in that field," Reynolds said.

In addition, Reynolds said that recent reports that India is rapidly becoming one of the biggest investors in Burma overlook the fact that most of India's investment was committed a long time ago to the two-block Shwe development project, whether or not it acquired the gas China is now buying.

Through its state-owned energy firm Oil and Natural Gas Corporation and sister firm GAIL, the Indian government has committed about US$1.3 billion to the Shwe development project, and also to the pipeline which will carry gas from the coast to China's Yunnan province. Thus far, there are no guarantees that India will be able to buy gas from any future discoveries, and despite Chinese inroads Thailand remains the biggest buyer of Burma's gas.

India's other big project in Burma, a trade route to the coast via a river flowing from the northeast Indian state of Mizoram, has been stalled for two years. Efforts by India to develop hydroelectric dam systems in western Burma to feed electricity to the northeast Indian states have also largely stalled.

In addition, India's Ministry of External Affairs acknowledged in May that cash shortages and bureaucracy on both sides of the border had delayed an agreement for Indian companies to dredge the River Kaladan to make it navigable for bigger commercial vessels, and also to renovate the port of Sittwe. The delay has pushed up costs by 40 percent to US$134 million.

India is Burma's biggest export market after Thailand, accounting for 17 percent of Burmese exports in the 2008-2009 financial year, but most of those exports are agricultural produce such as beans and pulses, said Australian economist Sean Turnell, who produces the Burma Economic Watch at Macquarie University in Sydney, in a study of Burma's economy.

Conversely, Burma's imports from India are insignificant, whereas China is the biggest single source of Burma's imports at more than 30 percent of the annual total.

"While commercial interests are doubtless playing an important part in India's closer ties with the junta, I would say that growing border security concerns are at least as important at present," said an official with a European Union embassy in Bangkok, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"India and Burma are close to signing an agreement to cooperate in trying to cut off the sources of money that funds separatist rebels operating in India's northeast states," the official told The Irrawaddy this week. "Those sources include drugs and weapons and extortion."

India's porous border with Burma is over 1,500 kilometers long and allows rebels to cross in and out of the Indian states of Manipur, Nagaland and Mizoram.

Another South Asia analyst, Marie Lall of Chatham House, a London-based think tank, concurs that the strengthening insurgency movement in India's northeast region, which has become more violent in the last 18 months, is at the heart of New Delhi's growing engagement with the Burmese junta.

The price of winning the junta's active support in combating rebels may not be very expensive economically—Than Shwe is reportedly keen on Indian know-how in developing Burma's nascent information technology town of Yadanabon, near the new capital Naypyidaw. But it could prove costly in political terms.

Reprinted with permission from Irawaddy Daily, awith which Asia Sentinel has a content-sharing agreement

Government Does Not Want Other Graduate Officers To Be Involved In Politics - Najib

PUTRAJAYA, July 28 (Bernama) -- The government has no plans yet to allow other graduate officers, except for those in the teaching profession, to be involved in politics to avoid a conflict of interests, said Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

The Prime Minister said the teachers' duty was only to teach without any executive power, thus there would not be any conflict of interests if they were to hold positions in any political party.

"We don't want those with (executive) power to hold positions (in any political party). If we have a certain position...executive power, there is a possibility a conflict of interest may arise.

"We begin with the teachers group first, then we will look whether it is appropriate to widen it to the other (graduate officers) groups or not," he said.

He said this to reporters after launching the "Tun Abdul Razak Bapa Pembangunan - Suatu Pengkisahan" at the Putrajaya International Convention Centre, here Wednesday.

Najib was commenting on the approval given to education service graduate officers on Grades DG41 to DG48 to be involved in politics beginning Aug 1.

Newspapers on Wednesday quoted the Chief Secretary to the Government, Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan, as saying that the approval was based on the fact that in the past, teachers had played a significant role in leading the community in the national political scenario.

The announcement enables about 190,000 graduate teachers throughout the country to be involved in politics.

Commenting further, Najib said that by allowing the teachers to be involved in politics, political leadership in the country could be further strengthened because this group could contribute in terms of intellectual leadership.

"There will be a vacuum in intellectual leadership at the grassroots level if teachers were not allowed to hold (political) positions," he said.

The Prime Minister said teachers were respected by society because they had better qualification and knowledge compared to others in a particular locality.

He said leadership that was intellectual in nature and not based on material wealth could also contribute towards the formation of a better political morality among leaders at the grassroots level.

"So, if the teachers become leaders, they will provide leadership that is more acceptable because the value of the leadership is based on knowledge and their position which can be said to command respect from the community in general, although there are exceptions," he said.

Meanwhile, he hoped that the teachers would not neglect their basic responsibility as educators and they must also respect the leadership structure in their respective schools and departments, after being allowed to be involved in politics.

"We cannot say that when we have political positions, we can ignore instructions from the department and so on," he said.

Asked on the possibility of a split among teachers in a particular school following the government's move, the Prime Minister believed that this would not occur.

"I don't think they will adopt an extremist attitude although they have political positions. They are adults in terms of their thinking and even in the past, we have allowed it (teachers to be involved in politics), there were no splits in the schools then," he said.

In another development, Najib said for the moment, the federal government had no intention of abolishing the policy of giving discounts to the bumiputera for the purchase of commercial real estates and housing units for rent.

He was commenting on the proposal by the DAP Member of Parliament for Petaling Jaya Utara, Tony Pua, that the Selangor government abolished the Bumiputera discount for the purchase of commercial real estates and housing units for rent in the state.

"This (matter) is actually under the jurisdiction of the state (government), the determination is stated in the approval for (State) Development Order. We have no proposal to abolish the discounts for Bumiputera (on the matter) at the moment.

"I concede that it may not remain forever but at the moment, it (abolition of the discount) is not appropriate yet," he said.

In this context, he reminded the DAP leaders against continuing to place pressure on the Malays and Bumiputeras on this matter because it could cause anger and dissatisfaction among them.

UK Parliament’s website silent about Taib’s visit

Taib Mahmud reportedly gave an address at the House of Lords in London on Friday, 23 July.
From the Bernama report here, it is not clear who exactly he was addressing, though the report mentioned:
Also present were Deputy Foreign Minister Datuk Richard Riot Anak Jaem, High Commissioner of Malaysia to the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland Datuk Zakaria Sulong, Special Advisor in the Chief Minister’s Office Tan Sri Adenan Satem, Conservative Women’s Organisation president Lady Fiona Hodgson, and the Muslim Council of Britain secretary-general Farooq Murad.
I wondered what the House of Lords itself had to say about the visit.
So I looked up the UK Parliament website under its ‘Lords news’ section here, and what did I find? Nothing. Do you see anything?
Now that doesn’t mean he didn’t speak there, but whatever he said, it wasn’t deemed newsworthy.
The following day, Saturday, the Chief Minister hosted a luncheon in London for students from Sarawak. About 30 turned up, according to the Chief Minister’s website.

Another RMAF Sgt suffers due to injustice of higher ups

Are the upper echelons of our armed forces busy protecting our country, or stealing from it?
Today features the 3rd installment of Malaysiakini’s expose on the armed forces.
They also carried a more human story, of yet another RMAF Sgt (after Tharmendran) who has suffered at the hands of his superiors.
Do read this tale of one brave man refusing to be part of an electricity theft scam, and being continually harassed and bullied by his superiors (although I think the term is clearly a misnomer) for refusing to play ball.
All of his family have been harassed and transfered from one end of the nation to the other, and even though he has retired, the RMAF continues to make life difficult for him, his wife, and his six children.
What makes these people think they have the right to beat up on ‘lower ranking’ Malaysians? What makes them think an institution as important as our armed forces is merely another ‘bowl’ to plunder money that belongs to the rakyat?
Sigh. I suppose they take leadership by (BN) example a little too seriously.
More on the Malaysiakini expose sometime in the future I hope.

Wednesday, 28 July 2010

Dr M: Code of ethics will make bloggers more respected

KUALA LUMPUR: Dr Mahathir Mohamad today called on bloggers to adhere to a certain code of ethics and ensure their blog articles are backed by truth in order for blogs to become a respected medium for the betterment of society. The former prime minister said the blogging ethics should be voluntary because these were for the bloggers' own good and from which they would build their reputation in the eyes of the people.

Mahathir, himself a blogger, said society had access to blogs, a medium which he said was "almost beyond the control of any authority", and that if bloggers were ethical and write the truth, more people would make blogs their source of information.

If bloggers adhered to these ethics, he said, "I think eventually people will come to respect blogs."

"If we are not saying the truth, people will desert blogs like (how they desert) the ordinary media today," he said in his keynote address at the Asian Bloggers and Social Media Conference 2010, here today.

The two-day conference, themed "Reflections of the Social Media Revolution", is organised by My Events International and is attended by about 400 people across Asia.

Mahathir said although bloggers were free to blog what they want, they should do so in a responsible manner and not abuse the medium.

"(Bloggers) should not say nasty things or curse people; don't do that because people will get annoyed and they can take action against you," he said, adding that "even if we don't like a person, we should not say things which are not true (about that person)".

Ordinary press

Mahathir, who runs a popular blog at http://chedet.co.cc/chedetblog/, said it was imperative for bloggers to be able to back what they say.

He said that although bloggers had the advantage in terms of freedom, they must make use of the freedom to shape the opinion towards building a better world community and for the betterment of the people.

"No one can stop or correct you because you are in charge; you are the writer, the editor and the publisher... when you have the weapons, don't use it indiscriminately. Bloggers must always exercise restraint and avoid anything that is not true and things that hurt people," he said.

Mahathir said while some blogs were very good, there were others which were "worthless" and that certain skills were needed to sort out blogs which reported the truth from those that contained mere propaganda.

"Problems arise because there are so much news coming in; you get confused and when you get confused you make the wrong decision. So you have to sort out the news," he said.

Mahathir also said that the ordinary press would not be able to write everything because of space constraint.

He said that because of such constraint he turned to blog to provide him with the space to express his views.

Mahathir also said that his blog was being read by people from many countries, including from Israel.

If bloggers write with responsibility, they and their blogs would become popular, he added.

- Bernama

Lawyer: Did DPP have sex with Saiful? Yes or no

By Syed Jaymal Zahiid - Free Malaysia Today

KUALA LUMPUR: Anwar Ibrahim's lawyers want a definite answer from the prosecution team of the sodomy II trial -- a yes or no if deputy public prosecutor Farah Azlina Latif has an affair with the hearing's key witness and alleged sodomy victim, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

In a letter submitted to lead prosecutor, Solicitor-General II Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden, lawyer Sankara Nair listed down three reasons for the demand.

First is that the allegation, which was reported by an online news portal on July 22, "has been published pervasively for national and worldwide viewing".

Second, said Sankara, is that there is serious implication in the integrity of the prosecution team.

"This is because the DPP involved is part of the prosecution team and has access to sensitive and confidential information that cannot be disclosed to Saiful," read the letter dated July 26.

Third is the reply given by Mohd Yusof, which was published in the same July 22 article, that had invited much speculation "particularly because the reply was vague and not firm".

"Therefore, your confirmation or denial will be much appreciated," concluded the letter.

Trial may be marred

The allegation was the latest scandal to rock the controversial sodomy trial, Anwar's second in 10 years, and is likely to further erode public confidence in the integrity of the trial.

The move by Attorney-General Abdul Ghani Pattail to drop Farah Azlina yesterday only strengthen this perception.

"The Attorney-General’s Chambers cannot compromise on any issue that can tarnish the image or credibility of the department and we are looking at such matters very seriously.

“This can be very difficult for us but any personal matter, if it can have any implication in whatever form on the department, will be handled very seriously,” he told a press conference at his office in Putrajaya yesterday.

He added that Farah Azlina had to be dropped not because she was found guilty, but to avoid any negative public perception on the prosecution team. He neither confirmed nor denied the alleged affair between the DPP and Saiful.

Anwar, who is the PKR de facto leader, is charged with sodomising Saiful at Unit 11-5-1 of the Desa Damansara Condominium in Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara, here between 3.01pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.

The 62-year-old has denounced the charge as “evil, frivolous lies by those in power” and had openly accused Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and his wife, Rosmah Mansor, of being the architects behind the sodomy II trial.

The former deputy prime minister is charged under section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years in jail and whipping upon conviction. The case resumes on Aug 3.

Perak's Pakatan reps to attend assembly sitting

By FMT Staff

KUALA LUMPUR: Perak Pakatan Rakyat assemblymen have agreed to attend the Aug 3 sitting after receiving a notice from “their legitimate speaker” V Sivakumar.

“We received the letter from legitimate speaker (from Pakatan) Sivakumar to attend the assembly sitting on Aug 3 at 10am," said Pakatan's MP and Pasir Panjang assemblyman Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin.

“We will now attend because the notice came from Sivakumar,” he added.

He said Barisan Nasional speaker R Ganesan had also sent them a notice informing them of the Aug 3 Perak assembly sitting.

“But our decision today is based on Sivakumar’s letter and not a notice from the illegal speaker (Ganesan),” said Nizar, referring to the incident on May 7 last year when Sivakumar was forcibly removed from the assembly hall on Ganesan's orders.

Sivakumar had subsequently filed a civil suit against Ganesan, seeking damages and an injunction to restrain Ganesan or his agents from prohibiting him from exercising his duties as speaker.

But on Sept 8 last year, the Ipoh High Court dismissed his suit on the grounds that the court could not interfere or question the validity of any proceedings in any state legislative assembly by virtue of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution.

Waiting for the agenda

Meanwhile, Nizar, who is also Bukit Gantang MP, expressed hope that the sitting this time round will be conducted according to regulations.

“We have informed them that we want the assembly to be conducted smoothly and in accordance with the set rules. We have also submitted an agenda and meeting order.

“Todate, however, we have not received any agenda from the illegal speaker. So we don’t really know what will happen and what will be debated during the sitting.

“He (Ganesan) did not say anything about the agenda in his letter. There was also no mention of questions-and-answers, written or verbal, so we don’t know what will happen on Aug 3,” said Nizar.

The last Perak sitting was held on March 30 and 31 and went down in history as the shortest ever state assembly sitting.

Nizar was replaced as the menteri besar by Umno's Zambry Abd Kadir when BN took over the state last year.

Hindu mum allowed review of kids’ Islam conversion

Indira is seeking to nullify her children’s conversion to Islam by her estranged husband. — file pic

IPOH, July 28 — Kindergarten teacher M. Indira Gandhi was granted leave today by the High Court here for a judicial review to quash her children’s conversion to Islam.
Lawyer M. Kulasegaran told The Malaysian Insider shortly after the matter was heard in chambers — where High Court Judge Zainal Adzam Abdul Ghani concurred that the matter was of public interest and should be disposed off quickly.
“He (Zainal) asked us if we wanted to wait for the decision on S. Shamala’s case in the Federal Court but we appealed to proceed with the matter. We should not delay on this any longer for it would affect the lives of the children involved,” Kulasegaran said.
He said Indira’s lawyers have 14 days to prepare a formal application to seek a hearing date from the court.
When contacted, Indira told The Malaysian Insider she was merely “cautiously happy” that she had been given an opportunity for her matter to be heard.
“I hope everything goes smoothly for it involves the livelihood of my children. I wish I did not have to fight this but what choice do I have? I do not want my kids to be Muslims and they do not want it either. I had to do something,” she said.
In Indira’s original application for leave last year, she had named six defendants: conversion authority Perak Muallaf registrar, the Perak Islamic Religious Department (JAIP), the Perak government, the education minister, the Malaysian government, and her estranged husband, K. Pathmanathan (now known as Mohd Ridzuan Abdullah).
Indira, who was granted custody of her three children — Prasana Diksa, two; Tevi Darsiny, 13; and Karan Dinish, 12 — by the court on March 11, is seeking to nullify her children’s conversion to Islam by their father without her consent on April 3 last year.
Mohd Ridzuan was previously granted a similar custody order but from the Syariah High Court and has since chosen to ignore the civil High Court’s decision, claiming that as a Muslim-convert, he was now bound by Syariah law.
When Indira’s application for leave was brought before the court on April 2, it was delayed to April 30 for the matter involved complex points of law and would likely be a landmark decision.
On April 30, however, it was delayed again to May 7, pending the decision from the Federal Court on Shamala’s case, which is similar to Indira’s.
However, Shamala’s case was also delayed after her Muslim convert husband, Dr Muhammad Ridzwan Mogarajah, challenged the practicality of proceedings in the absence of the mother, who had apparently fled the country for Australia.
In Indira’s case, the defendants have been arguing that the civil High Court had no jurisdiction to hear the matter as it involved three Muslim children.
But the plaintiff’s lawyers have continued to maintain that, as a non-Muslim, Indira had no other avenue for legal redress other than in the civil courts.
Indira is also arguing that during the time of the conversion last year only her Muslim-convert husband had been present.
He had named his eldest Tevi Darsiny as Umu Salamah; his son Karan Dinish, Abu Bakar; and toddler Prasana Diksa as Umu Habibah.
It is believed that Mohd Ridzuan presently resides in Kelantan with Prasana, whose whereabouts he has refused to reveal.

Storm clouds over Bayan Baru PKR dinner plan

By Athi Shankar

GEORGE TOWN: The acting chairman of PKR Bayan Baru may have got himself into hot water over a dinner function featuring Anwar Ibrahim and other big names.
Tan Seng Keat, who took over the division’s leadership following the defection of Zahrain Mohd Hashim, planned the dinner without consulting the divisional committee.

With the divisional election just around the corner, some suspect Tan has a personal agenda: he is trying to ingratiate himself with Anwar and other party leaders.

Tan has apologised for not consulting the committee, but some members of the division, including committee members, are still seething with dissatisfaction, if not outright anger.

Tan and a few colleagues planned the dinner for Aug 8 to accommodate Anwar. Apart from the PKR adviser, the other guests are Zaid Ibrahim and Chua Jui Meng.

Tan informed the committee of the plan at a meeting last July 17. His critics said this notice was too short and accused him of taking the committee for granted.

Sources said the 25-member committee had not discussed the dinner project in any of its meetings and was not aware of it until Tan’s announcement.

They claimed Tan and his “secret team” of a few committee members and several outsiders had already finalised the plan before securing the committee’s endorsement.

“We were treated like rubber stamps,” said a committee member.
Fierce argument

During the July 17 meeting, said a source, a “fierce argument broke out over the matter”, ending only after Tan had apologised.

Speaking to FMT, Tan admitted that the dinner plan was hatched by a small group of people a few days before the meeting.

“We quickly worked out the plan and fixed the dinner date based on the availability of Anwar,” he said.

However, he denied that he had shown disrespect to the committee members, saying the division had planned the dinner for June and then aborted it.

He said he “quickly grabbed the chance” when he heard that Anwar was available on Aug 8.

“It happened so fast, just three days before the committee meeting,” he said.

“So some of us got together to work it out in detail and tabled it at the meeting for approval.”

However, sources denied that the division had ever planned a dinner in June, saying Tan may have been referring to a public rally where Chua was to speak.

“The dinner was never on the agenda,” said a source.

Asked whether there was enough time to organise the dinner, Tan said the division members had vast experience in organising big events on short notice.

Councillor denies media report, mulls legal action

By Teoh El Sen - Free Malaysia Today,

UPDATED 12.11PM PETALING JAYA: Klang municipal councillor Tee Boon Hock today denied allegations of corruption as reported in The Star yesterday which claimed that he had obtained contracts worth RM1 million for his cronies.
"My family and I have not applied for or received a single contract from the municipal council and we will not bid for any such contracts as it would mean a direct conflict of interest," he told a press conference this morning.

Tee also said he was considering taking legal action against the English daily as the article has "seriously damaged the reputation of my family and myself".

"Based on the description of the councillor provided in The Star report, I am the only one who fit the profile: I am in my 50s and have previously stood twice for a state seat in past general elections and was in the municipal council tender board from October 2009 to June 2010," said Tee.

Tee was reported to have misused exco member Ronnie Liu's letterhead and seal to obtain contracts worth RM1 million for 20 companies, including one belonging to a family member.

This morning Tee said that he had been Pandamaran state assemblyman Liu's special assistant from March 2008 to November 2009.

“During this period I had received numerous requests for assistance from the public and the constituents of Pandamaran.

“As part of the service from the state rep's office, I had issued and signed letters of support for those requesting for assistance, including letters of support to the welfare department, on behalf of the handicap, single mothers and others in need as well as those seeking assistance from the local councils,” he said.
Liu: I was misquoted
He added that these letters were written “without obligating any government officials to act in any improper manner”.

“Where contractors are involved, all letters were specifically qualified with the statement “syarat-syarat Majlis Perbandaran dan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor dipenuhi sepenuhnya” and “undang-undang yang melibatkan kontraktor pembekalan dan perkhidmatan perlulah dipatuhi dan diikuti sejujurnya”,” he added.

He also said that he had not issued such letters after he had stopped being Liu's special assistant.

Meanwhile, Liu, who was also present at the press conference, claimed that he was wrongly quoted by the daily.

"I did not 'confirm' to The Star reporter that my 'letterhead had been misused and that the local councillor was now being investigated by the party'," said Liu, who added that from what Tee has explained, he had no problems with the letters.

The state exco member also said that he was wrongly attributed as the state's deputy chief for DAP.
Under state investigation
Selangor DAP chief Ean Yong Hian Wah, who was also at the press conference, said DAP would not protect any members and leaders involved in corruption and misuse of power.

"I would like to stress that the party would not hesitate to take action against those who work against the interest of the public. The party will continue to review this matter and the allegation."

Yong, who is also a state exco member, said the difference between Pakatan Rakyat and Barisan Nasional is that “we will investigate and take action on the accused if found guilty. But BN will do all it can to sweep the issue under the carpet”.
Selangor Mentri Besar Khalid Ibrahim had said yesterday that Tee faced a state level investigation which was started two weeks ago.
He was quoted in The Star as saying that the investigation started after Liu told him that the councillor had misused his letterheads to make recommendations to his cronies.

Selangor BN clutching at straws

By Stanley Koh - Free Malaysia Today

COMMENT The Chinese celebrate Zhongyuan, the ghost festival, on the 15th day of the seventh moon in their calendar. That coincides with Aug 15, but some politicians, not necessarily of Chinese descent, have started invoking ghosts earlier than scheduled.
The unexpected bereavement of Selangor’s BN government in 2008 bewildered many ambitious members of the coalition. The shock threw them off balance. It dazed and confused them as they tried to figure out what the future held in store for BN and, especially, for their individual selves.

Not anymore. Or so it seems. They appear to have finished licking their wounds and are now vigorously going after the ruling Pakatan Rakyat coalition.

Selangor BN’s recent actions and rhetoric can be likened to those of a private demolition company desperately trying to find fault with a spanking new building so that it can tear it down just to keep itself relevant and to spite the contractor chosen to build the new structure.

BN’s self-appointed champions have been whipping up trivial issues in the hope that the noise they make will drown out the voices of those recalling the sins of the previous administration.

But it is not so easy to chase away hungry ghosts. Words can mislead, but they cannot obliterate the record of years of extravagant and wasteful public spending, graft, power abuse and poor governance.

Onlookers of average intelligence can tell that BN has conceived its ghost stories poorly and they are not rushing for tickets to watch the theatre versions.

The much-promoted road show about shifting sands and muddy waters is a flop. It has not generated any meaningful interest. Instead of injecting fear into Pakatan, as promised in the pre-publicity, it has shown up the organisers and actors as poor amateurs and losers.

It is hard to tell whether the BN script is supposed to be serious or comical. Perhaps it is a fantasy. In contrast, Pakatan has gone for realism.

To understand the water issue, for instance, one only has to read the explicit and detailed account given by Kuala Selangor MP Dzulkefly Ahmad in his article, “Battle over Selangor’s water continues unabated”. Dzulkefly, a PAS leader, sits on the Selangor Water Panel.

The would-be BN heroes are even pretending to show deep concern for the health of the natural environment, something they used to rape with abandon. In fact, the previous Selangor state government, like many other BN governments, have a dismal record when it comes to protecting the environment.

The sad truths

BN has left a record of poor management of land and water resources, which we can blame for major floods, water shortage, pollution and loss of biodiversity in Selangor and elsewhere.
A biologist with a local university reported in 2005 that eight lakes and 11 rivers in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur had alarmingly high levels of pollutants caused by effluents from livestock farms and pharmaceutical industries.

Mangrove forests in Pulau Ketam, Pulau Tengah and Pulau Klang were over-logged and fast depleting.

The multimillion Paya Indah Wetlands sanctuary was a failure. It had to close down, even though the public had paid RM33.4 million for it.

There are more sad truths. The BN government promised that privatising water services would enhance the quality and availability of household water.

The fact is that millions of homes have been forced to install water distillers and cleansing equipment because of the poor quality of water flowing through the pipes. Water rationing has become an off-and-on affair, partly because of illegal logging under the BN administration.

Indeed, because logging is such a good source of income for BN cronies, many eco-systems in the country have been seriously compromised.

Under BN rule, our rivers die. In 1990, there were 48 clean rivers. By 2000, there were only 34 clean rivers left. It is anybody’s guess how many rivers are still clean now.

In short, BN has left a record of poor management of land and water resources, which we can blame for major floods, water shortage, pollution and loss of biodiversity in Selangor and elsewhere.

But incompetence, greed and corruption defile more than just water and air. They pollute morals as well. The Selangor exco village, the Cairo trip of the state public accounts committee and many other unsettled issues from the ghostly past still haunt Selangor residents and taxpayers.

Comic sketches
In 2006, a Selangor resident calling himself Subra wrote in a newspaper’s letters column:

“I have very little faith that things will ever change for the better as long as this country (under BN) rewards incompetency and throws merit down the drain.

“Corruption and incompetency are rife. My dealings with MPPJ on my father’s behalf were a joke. For instance, it took me three years and countless visits to the engineering department to get the 30-year-old crumbling roadside drain outside my house fixed.”

With all these in mind, one wonders where the current onslaught by Umno and MCA is heading. Political point scoring is one thing, but to exorcise the sins of the past is something else.

Hopefully, Selangor voters are cultured enough to distinguish between comic sketches put up by incompetent schoolboys and realistic plays presented by professional thespians.

The irrepressible Ibrahim Ali

By Stephanie Sta Maria - Free Malaysia Today

FMT EXCLUSIVE KUALA LUMPUR: Perkasa chief Ibrahim Ali isn't short on opinions. Neither is he hesitant about airing them, a trait that has seen him courting controversy and fending off brickbats.
But Ibrahim doesn't allow himself the luxury of being perturbed by the roar of approval or outrage that his views elicit.

The straight-talking independent Pasir Mas MP is more concerned with speaking up on issues that he deems are poorly represented or simply overlooked.

In this third and final part of his exclusive interview, he shared his stand on 1Malaysia education, the failure of Umno and PAS and Perkasa's road ahead.

FMT: What will your stand be in the next general election?

Ibrahim Ali: I've been too busy with Perkasa to think about the future of my political career and it's also too early for that now. At the moment, I'm very happy with my current position and if I have the means I will stand as an independent again. But I am also open to negotiations with other parties to enable me to contest in a straight fight instead of a three-cornered one.

Will Perkasa be a political party in the future?

I am against it because we have enough political parties in this country. Perkasa should remain an NGO but still play a role in shaping the political landscape by forming public opinion.

How is Perkasa funded?

We don't receive any donation from anyone. We only survive on membership funds. During our big events, we collect donations from members. But we don't receive any money from Umno or Dr Mahathir (Mohamad).

How many members does Perkasa have?

We have 50,000 official members right now and more than 200,000 unprocessed membership forms.

Do you think that Mahathir's support helped draw in the members?

I must admit that Mahathir's positive remarks of Perkasa have won us a lot of support. He even defended me as Perksasa chief. I really appreciate this. I don't think it's because he likes me but because he believes in standing for what is right. This is what sets him apart from other leaders.

Describe a model leader who truly looks out for Malay interests.

He should be in the government, practises straight talk and speaks up against any groups whose demands contradict the Federal Constitution. The problem arises when a leader manipulates political statements and tries to please everyone without referring to the constitution.

The biggest problem today is the misinterpretation of 1Malaysia by the opposition and certain NGOs. Perkasa understands the 1Malaysia concept as people first, performance now. The prime minister has already established that this concept is within the constitutional framework.

But there are certain people, like (DAP supremo) Lim Kit Siang, who have blatantly misinterpreted it as 'Malaysian Malaysia'. These people are the biggest hypocrites. If we are talking about 'bangsa Malaysia', then let's just have national schools and abolish all vernacular ones. It's ridiculous and hypocritical to talk about 'bangsa Malaysia' while still protecting your mother tongue.

DAP's demands are actually against 'bangsa Malaysia' and Perkasa takes these views very seriously. But DAP will survive as long as it continues using the racist and chauvinist political line.

Is PAS doing enough to safeguard Malay interests?

Its role as a defender of Malay rights was forfeited the moment it collaborated with DAP. Now it has no clear direction. I believe this is why the Malays and Muslims have turned to Perkasa. They see that PAS has deviated from its original struggle and is less vocal on Malay issues.

When issues involving Malays or Islam are raised in Parliament, PAS keeps silent because it wants to avoid the issue being blown up by DAP. But DAP has no problems lashing out on issues that it deems important whether it affects PAS or not.

Even Umno is very calculative and careful when touching on Malay issues following the last general election. Umno Youth should be taking up a lot of issues but its leader is keeping quiet.

This is how Perkasa gets support. We don't campaign to sell it like a marketing agency. The Malays are frustrated because Umno isn't doing enough to protect their interests and PAS is busy selling Islam to DAP.

How different is Umno Youth today from it was before?

I was an Umno Youth exco member and a divisional Youth leader, and I daresay that the Umno Youth today is completely different from what it was back then.

I had to be a divisional head for one term before qualifying as an exco member. From there, it takes years to reach the position of Youth leader. But Khairy Jamaluddin appeared out of nowhere and shot to the top.

He was found guilty of money politics but no action was taken against him. He wasn't a student leader or an activist and had no prior experience in such a position. He was just the son-in-law of the former premier. So what can you expect when he took over as Youth leader?

Khairy's favourite issue is attacking Anwar (Ibrahim). Good lah, because I'm also attacking Anwar. But what about other national issues? Umno Youth should talk about corruption, abuse of power, good governance and transparency like we did before.

We were able to do that because we were clean, not involved in big government projects and not the premier's son-in-law. So we could talk freely on any important national issues. Today they only pick up on one or two merely for their political survival.

Who do you think should be the next Umno Youth leader?

It's too early to predict but there are many candidates. The deputy chief Razali Ibrahim is one of them. If you want someone from the old group who is still fiery, then consider Tajuddin Rahman (Pasir Salak MP). If I were as still in Umno, I would consider the position myself.

How would you rate the prime minister and the deputy prime minister's leadership?

Najib (Tun Razak) is working very hard but the main question is, what has changed since he took over and how do the people feel about the change?

When Najib and Muhyiddin (Yassin) took over, the country was in very bad shape both politically and economically. It wasn't easy for them to achieve success in a short period of time but there are already some improvements taking place. To me, Najib's survival depends on the country's economy. If the 10th Malaysia Plan and the upcoming budget truly benefit the country and the people, then everything will be fine.

Malaysians also place high importance on national security and they have experienced BN long enough to know that this is guaranteed under the party. Right now, they are unhappy with the current situation but if the economy improves, BN will win back the majority and take back all the states.

On national security.

When it comes to sensitive issues, we have to decide whether we want national security or continue pushing an issue because of pride or on the basis of human rights. There are times you have to give and take for the sake of security and unity.

On education.

The meritocracy system in education doesn't work because it deprives the have-nots in the country. Scholarships are meant for the poor Malay, Chinese and Indian students in rural areas, not the urban ones whose families can take care of their education.

I want to see opportunities given to poor students with 5As instead of rich students with 9As. It has been proven that students can achieve excellent results in university even if they enter with minimum qualifications. The government spends RM1.4 billion on scholarships for just 1,500 students. How many of them are poor?

I want to see rural schools enjoying the same facilities as urban schools. I want to see graduate teachers in these schools. Why doesn't anyone talk about the equality of all schools under 1Malaysia?

I also want all boarding schools to be abolished because not everyone can get in due to the limited places. And those who can afford boarding schools are those who are also awarded scholarships.

Between liwat and zina: Did DPP dump fiance for Saiful?

Wong Choon Mei, Malaysia Chronicle

As Malaysians digest the latest sexual scandal in town, a debate has swept in over which is worse – liwat or zina (sodomy or adultery).

"If Saiful's sexual affair with the girl is his personal business, then why not the sodomy trial," wrote one commentator.

"It is the same (in that both are considered sins in some cultures) isn't it - zina and liwat. You can say under civil law there is specific provision to (nail) anwar but under Syariah law there is also punishment for zina."

Unfair advantage

Late on Tuesday, news broke that Farah Azlina Latiff, a deputy public prosecutor, was dropped from the sodomy trial against Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim because of an alleged sexual affair with the complainant in the case – Saiful Bukhair Azlan.

The Attorney-General would only say Farah was being dropped to prevent negative public perception of the prosecution, but Anwar’s lawyers are calling a mistrial.

Citing fundamental conflict of interest, they fear Saiful’s closeness to the DPP has armed him with unfair knowledge and advantage over Anwar.

Indeed the latest speculation making the rounds is that Farah even broke off her engagement to her fiancé just to be with Saiful.

“If true, all this indicates that the relationship was very serious. The fundamental issue is that of a serious conflict of interest and this cannot be resolved by removing her,” Sivarasa said.

“We can understand that this must be a terrible time for her and Saiful but imagine how Anwar and his family must have felt each time the government trumps up these charges against him.”

Muslims shocked

Meanwhile, Muslims leaders – shocked at how the scandal has been unfolding – are starting to call for a thorough probe. Under Syariah law, sex outside marriage is a punishable offence.

“With the current liberal outlook, it is hard to be the bad guy to push for punishment because we also have compassion in our hearts,” PAS vice president Mahfuz Omar told Malaysia Chronicle.

“But there is a convention we have subscribed to and we cannot avoid, especially now, when the incident has become so public. We would be failing in our duty to all concerned – including Anwar – if we do not urge the religious authorities to investigate and they would not be doing their duty by the ummat if they did not do so.”

Other pundits also slammed the entire episode which has shamed the country, pinning the blame on Prime Minister Najib Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor. Anwar had accused the first couple of plotting the charges to derail his political comeback.

"The only one I feel sorry for is the girl for falling for Saiful," wrote the commentator. "It is enough. Najib should stop the farce once and for all and start repairing the country."

Let’s talk about sex, please

By Gan Pei Ling | The Nut Graph
(Chalkboard image by ilco / sxc.hu)
(Chalkboard image by ilco / sxc.hu)
TO its credit, the government is trying to introduce sex education in schools. From mid-2009 till end of 2011, the Women, Family and Community Development Ministry and the Education Ministry are implementing a pilot project targeting 16- and 17-year-olds in five schools.
“The ministry hopes to use the outcome from the project to advocate for the inclusion of social and reproductive health education in primary and secondary schools,” Women, Family and Community Development Minister Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil tells The Nut Graph. Indeed, with increased reports of baby dumping and teenage pregnancies, having sex education is clearly an imperative.
The pilot project is called I’m In Control, and Shahrizat explains that the module educates teenagers on how to identify and avoid high-risk situations, including assertive techniques to avoid premarital sex.
If the government is eventually successful in implementing sex education in schools, how should a comprehensive sex education look like? Additionally, what obstacles stand in the way of sex education?
Sexual beings
P.S. The Children‘s training and education director Nooreen Preusser says that everyone, regardless of their age, is a sexual being. “Even babies are curious about their bodies and play with their genitals; it’s a healthy curiosity,” she says in a phone interview with The Nut Graph.
Hence, she argues, sex and sexuality education should begin from pre-school, in an age-appropriate way.
Preusser (Courtesy of Nooreen Preusser)
Preusser (Courtesy of Nooreen Preusser)
“We could start by teaching children the correct names of their private body parts as we teach them the names of their other body parts,” she says, adding that that this signals there is no shame or mystery associated with private body parts.
Preusser says that in Germany, eight- and nine-year-olds are taught the basic facts about heterosexual sex and conception.
“The children are not shocked as it is done in an appropriate and matter-of-fact way,” she says, stressing that children also need to be taught to differentiate between a safe and unsafe touch.
Preusser adds that in countries like Finland and Netherlands, where sex education starts at pre-school, the rates of unplanned teenage pregnancies and teenagers infected with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are much lower.
Access to information
Malaysian youths are also not helped by their alarmingly low awareness about contraception, according to a survey released in 2009. Additionally, contraception is not offered by the public health sector to unmarried people, Low Wah Yun from Universiti Malaya‘s Faculty of Medicine points out in a 2009 research paper.
Youths only have access to contraceptive services by private and non-governmental organisations. However, low awareness on the availability of such services and social stigma prevent most youth from accessing these services.
Condoms
(Pic by zts / Dreamstime)
“Teenagers have the right to accurate sexual and reproductive health information so that they can make responsible and informed sexual choices,” says Wong Li Leng from the Federation of Reproductive Health Associations Malaysia (FRHAM).
She says her association promotes abstinence, but “we have to accept the reality that some teenagers are engaging in premarital sex, and they need to have information to protect themselves and their partners from HIV/AIDS, STIs, unplanned pregnancies, etc.”
Teaching equality
Activist and writer Marina Mahathir says gender is a key component that should be included in sex education.
“We have to educate teenagers about negative gender stereotypes; for example, how boys are expected to be macho all the time and girls are expected to be submissive in relationships under social norms,” the 3R executive producer says. The TV programme 3R tackles issues on sexuality and women’s rights.
Wong agrees with Marina: “[W]ithout knowing the assumptions made to boys and girls, and recognising how gender stereotyping affects their choices and relationships in their lives, teenagers will not be able to apply the skills [in negotiating sexual relationships] in their daily lives.”
Wong adds that in FRHAM’s module, they also educate adolescents on their rights and values, and what to do when their rights are violated. “[F]or example, if they are sexually harassed or abused, we educate them on why it happens, what to do, and where to go.”
Wong (Courtesy of Cheah Shu Yi)
Wong (Pic courtesy of Cheah Shu Yi)
“We [also] explore issues on peer pressure, and the techniques of saying ‘no’,” Wong tells The Nut Graph.
Marina adds that topics such as dating, commitment in a relationship, as well as the existence of different sexualities should also be discussed in sex education.
In Singapore, sex education starts from upper primary till pre-university level. However, homosexuality is only covered in one lesson in lower secondary school, and students are taught that homosexual acts are illegal. People with other sexualities such as transgender, asexual and intersex are not mentioned in the curriculum at all.
“We can’t pretend that people with different sexualities don’t exist. It only serves to elevate discrimination against them. We need to create more safe spaces for people to talk about these issues,” says Marina.
Wong says FRHAM does provide information on other sexualities in their module.
Political will
If Malaysian youth are to be empowered to make informed and responsible choices on their sexual and reproductive health behaviour, then having comprehensive sex education would help. However, the government’s attempt to introduce sex education, also known as social and reproductive health education or sexuality education, in schools is not new.
In 2005, the Education Ministry announced it planned to introduce sex education to curb sexual crimes, internet pornography, and premarital sex. The government also considered including sex education in the National Service programme in 2008. There have not been any updates on either initiative.
Shahrizat (File pic)
Shahrizat (File pic)
Shahrizat says many parents worry because they misconceive sex education as teaching young people how to have sex, while teachers say they are not prepared to take on the subject.
“[P]arents worry [this] will lead to early sexual experimentation and promiscuity.
“However, findings of studies carried out by countries that have implemented sex education such as Sweden, Norway and Netherlands have shown that sex education for young people leads to a delay in sexual initiation, promotes abstinence, and prevents STIs and unwanted pregnancies,” Shahrizat says.