Share |

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Denying witness adds spice to ex-Umno leader’s corruption trial

TEMERLOH, Feb 1 — The corruption trial of former Federal Territory Umno Youth head Datuk Mohamad Norza Zakaria and his agent, Halimi Kamaruzzaman, took a new twist today when a prosecution witness claimed that the statement given to a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officer earlier was inaccurate.

Datuk Khadri Musa, 47, who is the ninth prosecution witness, claimed during cross-examination that his statement on Jan 20 last year was made in a ‘cut and paste’ manner based on the statement made by another individual, Yusof Jamaludin.

Khadri, who is also the Maran Umno division committee member, said the MACC officer concerned only changed his personal particulars in the statement.

When questioned by counsel Datuk Seri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, who represented Mohamad Norza, whether he had signed the statement, Khadri confirmed that he had signed the statement.

However, he said, he did so because he wanted to return home early as he had business matters to attend to in Putrajaya the following day.

Khadri: But it was not the signature that I normally used.

Muhammad Shafee: Explain why Datuk did not use your normal signature.

Khadri: I was afraid that the information was not true, so my signature was also not the right one.

When questioned by Muhammad Shafee why he did not read the statement before signing it, Khadri said he could not do so because he did not have his spectacles at that time.

Asked on the treatment given to him by the MACC officers, Khadri said the officer who recorded his conversation at the Temerloh MACC office, here was courteous, but two other MACC officers were very rude to the extent of shouting at him.

Earlier, when questioned by Deputy Public Prosecutor Saiful Edris, Khadri told the court that he had been invited to attend a gathering at the house of Mohammad Anuar Yunus in Temerloh on Jan 20, last year where Mohamad Norza was also present.

Asked on the highlights of Mohamad Norza’s speech at the gathering, Khadri said the accused talked about the direction of the Malays, the role of Umno Youth before continuing with the question and answer session.

However, after being shown the statement he had made to the MACC earlier, Khadri later said that Mohamad Norza had asked for the support of delegates who were present for a seat in the Umno Supreme Council at the election to be held later.

Shafee, however, applied to the court to take into consideration the statement made in court instead of the one made earlier.

Meanwhile, Khadri also told the court that he had been called by his cousin Halimi, who is also the second accused, who had given him five white envelopes to be distributed to four other members of the Maran Umno at the gathering.

Saiful: After getting them (envelopes), did you look at the content?

Khadri: Yes, RM300 in cash.

Saiful: What’s the purpose of giving the RM300?

Khadri: Petrol money.

Mohamad Norza, 43, who was also a former Umno Supreme Council member, is accused of giving a bribe of RM1,500 to Khadri through Halimi to be distributed to the delegates as an inducement to vote for him in the contest for a seat in the Umno Supreme Council at the last Umno General Assembly.

He also faces another charge of giving a bribe of RM1,900 to Mohammad Anuar Yunus through Halimi for the same purpose.

Both charges are alleged to have been committed at 6.30 pm on Jan 20, 2009 at No. 38, Pinggiran Tasik, Taman Bandar Temerloh, here.

Halimi, 47, from Bandar Indera Mahkota, Kuantan is being charged on two counts of giving bribes to Khadri and Mohammad Anuar on behalf of Mohamad Norza at the same time, date and place.

The hearing before Sessions Court Judge Azuar Che Yusof continues tomorrow. — Bernama

3 Selangor Pakatan reps hauled up over discrepancies

The Selcat committee, with Teng in the middle have been quizzing assemblymen all day over their allocation expenditures. – Picture by Jack Ooi

By Neville Spykerman - The Malaysian Insider

SHAH ALAM, Feb 1 — Three Selangor Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers faced a state watchdog committee this morning to explain spending discrepancies in constituency allocations.

The Special Select Committee for Accountability, Competency and Transparency (Selcat) called assemblymen Ronnie Liu (Pandamaran), Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad (Sri Setia) and Shuhaimi Shafiei (Sri Muda) to detail their expenses for their respective constituencies.

Liu of DAP, who is state executive councillor for local government and research, was the first to testify this morning.

Nik Nazmi, who is the political secretary to the Selangor Mentri Besar, and Shuhaimi, both from PKR, testified later.

During the public inquiry, which was telecast “live” over the state government website, Liu struggled to explain how he had spent 99 per cent of his RM600,000 annual allocation for small projects in the first half of last year.

Selangor Speaker Teng Chang Khim, who heads Selcat, ticked him off several time for arguing with the committee and for not following decorum by taking sips from his water bottle, until he (Teng) had to order that it be taken away from him.

Teng also called for a short recess midway into his testimony to allow Liu to have a drink and to cool down as he was getting increasingly agitated.

Teng also had to remind his fellow DAP lawmaker several times that he was testifying under oath.

As an executive councillor, Liu said he received an additional RM100,000 as compared to other PR lawmakers who received half a million ringgit. But he admitted that none of his funds were used for small projects, because of overwhelming demands for donations.

Among the donations he was grilled about were three durian festivals he funded, including one which cost RM10,000, and RM30,000 which he gave St.John’s Ambulance which he said was to help buy vehicles.

Facing the committee... Nazmi (left) and Liu.

Liu justified the durian festivals were “highly successful” community programmes.

However, he ran into problems explaining three cheques of RM10,000 donated to St.John’s Ambulance because letters seeking the donations indicated the money was for a recycling programme and a blood donation drive.

“To my mind, the money was to help buy vehicles.” he said adding that the arrangement was made by his former personal assistant (PA), even though he had signed the approval for the donations.

Liu also testified that his funds ran out because there were 300 associations, and 21 schools besides religious organisations in Klang who needed funds .

However, Teng, whose Sungai Pinang constituency is among nine in the Klang District, pointed out that Liu was the only lawmaker who had finished his state allocations in just six months.

Teng also pointed out that Liu’s explaination he was hard pressed to keep up with the demands from associations and religious organisations was not completely accurate because only 30 associations and 10 religious organisations received funds from him.

This was disputed by Liu and Teng ordered him to list out loud each of the organisations which had received funds from him last year.

As it turned out, 43 out of 168 of Liu’s contributions were made to associations and religious bodies but he pointed out that this amounted to 25 per cent of his allocation.

Liu also blamed his previous PA for not informing him that 99 per cent of his annual allocation had been used by the middle of last year.

“My assistant only told me that we were running out of funds.”

However, Selcat committee member Saari Sungib pointed out that prior to the general elections in March 2008, most Barisan National (BN) lawmakers had also spent their annual allocation in just two months and that Liu should have known better.

Liu said he himself had spoken out on the issue but his concerns were whether the funds reached those it was intended for and not the timeframe of when the money was spent.

But this annoyed Teng who reminded Liu again that he was testifying under oath.

Liu revealed that in order to cater to “demands” for donations, after his allocations had run out, he either made pledges to pay organisations from next year’s allocation or even borrow money which he would return after getting funds from the District Office.

He said he had pledged RM120,000 last year, which he needed to pay from funds from this year’s allocations and pointed out that those receiving the funds did not mind waiting.

“I feel freedom should be given to lawmakers to decide how the funds are spent.”

Shuhaimi listening attentively. – Picture by Jack Ooi

Meanwhile, both Nik Nazmi and Shuhaimi managed to give Selcat convincing explanations as to why they had overspent their allocations, by breaching the 70 per cent trashold allowed, in the first half of last year.

Shuhaimi told the committee that there had been three floods in his constituency in December 2008 and January 2009 and he had used allocations for small infrastructure projects as well as donations for the victims.

Nik Nazmi also testifed that his constituency had floods and that he had used his funds to repair a religious school and surau.

The Selcat inquiry into improving the management and use of state funds by lawmakers ended today with their testimonies.

Teng said a total of 12 main witnesses were called during the entire inquiry, including nine district officers and a report, with recommendations, will be tabled at the State Assembly.

“The committee will review the testimony of all the witnesses and we hope to table our report at the next sitting of the House in April.”

Coroner rejects MACC contempt, Teoh inquest resumes Feb 19

By Debra Chong- The Malaysian Insider

The late Teoh Beng Hock.

SHAH ALAM, Feb 1 — The highly-anticipated second autopsy report on Teoh Beng Hock will be presented in court after Chinese New Year when the long-postponed inquest resumes after being disrupted by a bid to cite an anti-graft officer for contempt.

The magistrate’s court here today rejected the bid by the deceased’s family who wanted action taken against Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officer Raub Ghani for lodging a police report against a key witness in the ongoing inquest.

Magistrate Azmil Muntapha Abbas said that in a contempt charge, the intention behind the act did not matter.

But he also pointed out that Raub’s action had neither prompted the police nor the Attorney General (AG) to investigate, arrest or charge Dr Pornthip for allegedly leaking as yet classified information.

“But from the facts of this case, there was no case of investigating by the police and AG and no charge filed against Dr Pornthip,” said Azmil.

“At this stage, the application for leave is rejected,” he concluded, after days of hearing submissions from both Teoh’s family and the MACC.

Azmil, who is also acting as the coroner in the inquest, then fixed 9.30am on Feb 19 to hear the findings of the second post-mortem by Sungai Buloh Hospital’s Dr Shahidan Md Noor.

Lawyers for the Teohs, Karpal Singh and his son, Gobind Singh Deo, told reporters they would not be appealing against the magistrate’s decision.

The Teohs filed the application after Raub had made a police report against independent Thai pathologist Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand for allegedly leaking the results of the second autopsy.

The family’s lawyers believe the police report, citing an article published in a PKR-owned newspaper, Suara Keadilan, was an attempt to “interfere with the judicial process” as well as to “intimidate” Dr Pornthip who was brought in for a second opinion on how the 30-year-old political aide really died.

Teoh, a former aide to a Selangor DAP executive councillor, was found dead under mysterious circumstances last July while in the care of anti-graft officers who were investigating his boss.

Zambry confident Umno can win 34 seats in next polls

By Leslie Lau and Clara Chooi - The Malaysian Insider

IPOH, Feb 1 – Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir (pic) is confident Umno can take 34 seats in the next elections but said he won’t dissolve the state legislature until the next general election.

The Perak Mentri Besar declared he won’t play into Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) game to call for snap polls and instead challenged them to quit their 28 state seats to prove their popularity.

“Yes, I am confident... but mind you, I am also working independently with other groups to seek people’s opinion,” Zambry told The Malaysian Insider when asked about Behrang assemblyman Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi’s prediction for the next general election.

The Pangkor assemblyman will know on Feb 9 if he remains mentri besar when the Federal Court decides the legality of his appointment after his Barisan Nasional coalition (BN) toppled the PR government on Feb 5 last year.

PR Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Nizar Mohd Jamaluddin’s government collapsed when Jamaluddin and another PKR colleague joined a DAP lawmaker turn independent to support the BN to control 31 seats in the 59-seat state assembly.

“It is simple. If you think that BN is scared because we do not have the people’s support, alright we won’t dissolve but I want to see that since you say that you have the people’s support, you go and resign your 28 seats,” Zambry said.

When pointed that, under election laws, the 28 cannot recontest their seats if they resign, the mentri besar said the elections were to test their parties’ popularity, not their own.

However, he stressed that there is no question of dissolving the legislature until BN chief and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak makes the decision.

Jamaluddin told The Malaysian Insider last week PAS and PKR will find it difficult to retain some of its 13 Perak state seats in the next general election as long as Umno's resurgence is sustained.

He said if Umno just “works hard”, he expects the two PR parties to be able to retain just half the seats they won in Election 2008.

He pointed out, however, that he expects DAP, PKR and PAS's partner in PR, to win back all of its 18 seats.

Umno won 27 of the 34 seats it contested in Election 2008 while its BN partner MCA took one seat, resulting in the coalition winning just 28, three short of what was needed for a simple majority in the Perak legislature. The rest of the BN parties were badly beaten.

A full interview with Zambry will appear in The Malaysian Insider on Feb 6, a year after the Perak palace named him the state’s 12th mentri besar.

Zambry confident Umno can win 34 seats in next polls

By Leslie Lau and Clara Chooi - The Malaysian Insider

IPOH, Feb 1 – Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir (pic) is confident Umno can take 34 seats in the next elections but said he won’t dissolve the state legislature until the next general election.

The Perak Mentri Besar declared he won’t play into Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) game to call for snap polls and instead challenged them to quit their 28 state seats to prove their popularity.

“Yes, I am confident... but mind you, I am also working independently with other groups to seek people’s opinion,” Zambry told The Malaysian Insider when asked about Behrang assemblyman Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi’s prediction for the next general election.

The Pangkor assemblyman will know on Feb 9 if he remains mentri besar when the Federal Court decides the legality of his appointment after his Barisan Nasional coalition (BN) toppled the PR government on Feb 5 last year.

PR Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Nizar Mohd Jamaluddin’s government collapsed when Jamaluddin and another PKR colleague joined a DAP lawmaker turn independent to support the BN to control 31 seats in the 59-seat state assembly.

“It is simple. If you think that BN is scared because we do not have the people’s support, alright we won’t dissolve but I want to see that since you say that you have the people’s support, you go and resign your 28 seats,” Zambry said.

When pointed that, under election laws, the 28 cannot recontest their seats if they resign, the mentri besar said the elections were to test their parties’ popularity, not their own.

However, he stressed that there is no question of dissolving the legislature until BN chief and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak makes the decision.

Jamaluddin told The Malaysian Insider last week PAS and PKR will find it difficult to retain some of its 13 Perak state seats in the next general election as long as Umno's resurgence is sustained.

He said if Umno just “works hard”, he expects the two PR parties to be able to retain just half the seats they won in Election 2008.

He pointed out, however, that he expects DAP, PKR and PAS's partner in PR, to win back all of its 18 seats.

Umno won 27 of the 34 seats it contested in Election 2008 while its BN partner MCA took one seat, resulting in the coalition winning just 28, three short of what was needed for a simple majority in the Perak legislature. The rest of the BN parties were badly beaten.

A full interview with Zambry will appear in The Malaysian Insider on Feb 6, a year after the Perak palace named him the state’s 12th mentri besar.

Malaysian police and judiciary on trial

But then the Malaysian government has been known to always put its foot in its mouth like when they sentenced a young woman to caning for drinking beer and then went down on their hands and knees and begged the woman to appeal the sentence so that the caning punishment can be aborted.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Dr Mohd Puad, who is the Deputy Education Minister, said Raja Petra’s return to Malaysia was also important to assist police in investigating the “Allah” issue. – The Star, 1 February 2010

*********************************************

The police investigation into the Allah issue has been completed and Muhammad bin Abdullah was today indicted for being the man behind the controversy.

Earlier, the Deputy Education Minister called upon the police to complete their investigation against Raja Petra Kamarudin as soon as possible.

According to the Deputy Education Minister, Raja Petra, also known as RPK, Peter Pete, Pet, Putera, The Pink Panther, The Avenger.Malaysia (his e-mail address), and so on, is suspected of being one of those behind the Allah issue.

This was confirmed by Dr Mohd Puad, the Deputy Education Minister, in a Star news report on 1 February 2010, although he did not clarify in what way RPK is involved and what role he played in the issue.

The Royal Malaysian Police, who have come under severe criticism for its lack of action and its inability to bring back RPK to face trial, announced that although it was not able to detain RPK, it has, however, managed to arrest the man suspected of being the person who first started this whole controversy.

When asked how he pleads, Muhammad bin Abdullah pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

Muhammad bin Abdullah’s lawyer, Moses Abraham Jesus, said that they will be contesting the charge and claimed that the arrest is a political stunt aimed at giving the impression that the police successfully completed their investigations.

The police are at a loss and are not able to solve the controversy, claimed Moses Abraham Jesus. So they are looking for a scapegoat, a fall guy, and my client, Muhammad bin Abdullah is it.

The police claim that they have strong and tangible evidence that Muhammad bin Abdullah is their man, said Moses Abraham Jesus. And they are going to present verses of the Quran, extracts of the Sirah, and quotes from the Hadith to buttress their case.

But they are going on the assumption that the Muhammad bin Abdullah mentioned in all those documents is the same Muhammad bin Abdullah who is my client, argued Moses Abraham Jesus.

Just because these two people share the same name does not mean they are the same person, explained Moses Abraham Jesus. You also have to check their identity card (IC) numbers.

So far, the police have not been able to produce the IC number of the Muhammad bin Abdullah mentioned in all those documents. So how can they say this is the same Muhammad bin Abdullah as my client?

The police have no case against my client and are merely clutching at straws, added Moses Abraham Jesus. We will prove that the Muhammad bin Abdullah that the police are talking about is another man who died some time ago. That Muhammad bin Abdullah is not the Muhammad bin Abdullah my client.

We will not dispute the allegation by the police that it was Muhammad bin Abdullah who started this Allah business and which is the source of all this controversy today, explained Moses Abraham Jesus. We are confident the police would know what they are talking about so we shall avoid going into that issue. We shall only focus on the argument that that was another Muhammad bin Abdullah and not my client who is now facing charges of starting this entire Allah problem.

Is this a case of mistaken identity or the case of a fall guy being set up to take the rap and make it appear like the Malaysian police have efficiently solved ‘the Crime of the Millennium’?

Whatever it may be, the trial is going to attract a lot of interest and will raise the question as to who should take the blame for starting this whole problem and whether the Muhammad bin Abdullah now facing trial is the culprit or, as his lawyer claims, another Muhammad bin Abdullah who has since died.

The Malaysian judiciary and the Malaysian police may eventually end up as the ones on trial if they do not handle this case properly. If the court agrees with the line of defense that Muhammad bin Abdullah is guilty of starting the controversy but that it was another Muhammad bin Abdullah who has since died and not the one on trial, this may trigger another controversy if the supporters of Muhammad bin Abdullah who regard him as a Prophet come out in protest.

The Malaysian government may be stepping into very dangerous territory by pursuing this case. The government would be best advised not to pursue with this indictment as it may open a ‘Pandora’s Box’, which may never be closed again. But then the Malaysian government has been known to always put its foot in its mouth like when they sentenced a young woman to caning for drinking beer and then went down on their hands and knees and begged the woman to appeal the sentence so that the caning punishment can be aborted.

Until today the woman is yet to be caned even though she has refused to appeal the sentence and has demanded that the sentence be carried out.

Umno boleh buat apa mereka mahu – Ku Li

(Harakah Daily) - Apa yang ingin dilakukan oleh Umno terhadap Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah adalah tidak relevan kerana isu sebenar ialah ketetapan undang-undang bahawa Kelantan dan Terengganu berhak mendapat royalti.

"Siapa saya berbanding isu sebenarnya, iaitu undang-undang dan hak rakyat. Umno boleh buat apa yang mereka mahu. Tetapi selepas itu mereka tetap terpaksa berhadapan dengan undang-undang negara dan berhadapan dengan rakyat," Malaysiakini memetik bekas Menteri Kewangan itu berkata ketika mengulas kemungkinan tindakan Umno terhadapnya.

Ini ekoran tindakan Razaleigh yang juga Ahli Parlimen Gua Musang menyampaikan ucapan mengenai hak Kelantan untuk mendapatkan royalti minyak di Majlis Solat Hajat dan Ceramah Perdana Royalti Petroleum di Stadium Sultan Mohamed Ke-IV, Kota Bharu pada 28 Januari lalu.

Beliau mengulangi penegasan bahawa Akta Kemajuan Petroleum memberikan hak di sisi undang-undang kepada Kelantan dan Terengganu untuk mendapat bayaran tunai royalti sebanyak lima peratus hasil keuntungan minyak di luar pesisir.

"Sebagai Pengerusi Petronas pada waktu itu, saya yang merangkakan undang-undang tersebut dan menandatangani perjanjian atas arahan bekas Perdana Menteri, Allahyarham Tun Abdul Razak Hussein.

"Beliau mahu memastikan negeri-negeri yang miskin di Semenanjung mendapat faedah dari minyak yang diperolehi di luar pesisir," kata bekas Naib Presiden Umno itu.

Razaleigh berkata, beliau tahu negeri-negeri tersebut tidak mempunyai minyak di pesisirnya.

Perdana Menteri yang juga Presiden Umno, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak menyatakan pihaknya memerlukan masa untuk meneliti kenyataan yang dibuat oleh Razaleigh yang juga Ketua Umno Bahagian Gua Musang itu sebelum menentukan adakah ia melanggar disiplin parti.

Katanya, Umno juga akan meneliti terlebih dahulu kenyataan yang dibuat oleh Razaleigh mengenai persetujuannya untuk mengetuai kaukus royalti minyak Kelantan sebelum memutuskan tindakan selanjutnya.

Menurut Tengku Razaleigh pula, fungsi kaukus tersebut seharusnya diperluaskan dengan mengkaji semula kedudukan dan hak negeri-negeri sebagai anggota kepada Persekutuan Malaysia.

Malaysia's Anwar faces career-breaking sodomy trial

Human rights group Amnesty International has sharply criticised the charges against Anwar, who in his first trial was brought to court with a black eye after a vicious beating from the police chief.

By Sarah Stewart, AFP

Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim faces trial Tuesday on sodomy charges that threaten to neutralise the former deputy premier who was sacked and jailed on similar allegations a decade ago.

Anwar spent six years in prison before rallying the opposition to stunning gains in 2008 elections, in the most potent challenge ever faced by the multi-ethnic coalition that has ruled Malaysia for half a century.

He has condemned the new allegations levelled by a 24-year-old former aide, which could see him jailed for up to 20 years, as a conspiracy to end his political career and raised doubts he will get a fair hearing.

"I'm shocked with the (government's) impunity to go on with such a case despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary," he said last week.

The trial was originally due to start last July but has been repeatedly delayed as the defence team pursued legal manoeuvres including bids to obtain access to prosecution evidence like medical reports and CCTV footage.

Anwar's lawyer Sankara Nair said he would file another delay application at the start of Tuesday's hearing in the High Court but said there seemed to be a campaign to push ahead with the trial.

"The fact that they're not giving us certain crucial documents which they ought to give us has certainly had an emasculating effect in our preparation of the defence," he told AFP Monday.

Human rights group Amnesty International has sharply criticised the charges against Anwar, who in his first trial was brought to court with a black eye after a vicious beating from the police chief.

"The Malaysian authorities have resorted to the same old dirty tricks in an attempt to remove the opposition leader from politics," Amnesty Asia-Pacific director Sam Zarifi said in a statement.

"Anwar's case has rightly raised doubts among the international community and investors about Malaysia's commitment to justice and the rule of law."

The trial looms after a torrid few months in Malaysian politics, with the opposition beset by infighting and the government struggling to handle a religious row that has seen places of worship firebombed and vandalised.

Bridget Welsh, a Southeast Asia analyst from Singapore Management University, said the trial was a "high-risk strategy" for Prime Minister Najib Razak, who came to power last year on a reform platform.

"The fact that the trial's moving forward is already damaging. They can't get away from the fact that they seem to be victimising the leader of the opposition," she said.

"It's also going to be seen as a test for Najib and his government over the type of tactics they use and how they carry out and implement power."

Welsh said the trial, which defence lawyers say could drag on for up to eight months in a high-profile test for Malaysia's much-criticised justice system, could prove to be a "long, painful process for both sides".

"The trial is going to continue to test the coherence of the opposition as a whole, it will raise doubts over Anwar among some in the opposition," she said of the 62-year-old who is struggling to maintain party discipline.

Anwar, a married father of six, was a star finance minister before being sacked in 1998 amid a policy row with then-premier Mahathir Mohamad during the Asian economic crisis.

He was convicted of sodomy and corruption but the sex charge was overturned and he was freed in 2004.

Mass protests broke out when he was jailed a decade ago and he has said he "cannot preclude" a repeat of those turbulent days if he is convicted once again.

Pakatan Rakyat ‘bleeding’ can be serious

(The Star) - The “internal bleeding” of Pakatan Rakyat is just the beginning of a more serious problem for the pact, MCA vice-president Datuk Seri Kong Cho Ha said.

He said: “Normally, in medical terms, if there’s haemorrhaging in the brain, it will lead to a stroke.”

Kong was commenting about an article in The Star yesterday quoting DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang who reportedly said in his blog Pakatan was “bleeding internal”.

“The internal squabble bet ween Pakatan Rakyat leaders is not unexpected because of the three parties’ different political ideologies,” Kong said at the swearing-in of the Chinese Chin Woo Ath letic Association’s new committee members here yesterday.

He pointed out that Pakatan was just a union of convenience based on a loose understanding when the opportunity presented itself in the country’s political scene. Meanwhile, Kong also said there would be no fresh MCA election for the time being, although it could still be held if two-thirds of its central committee members resigned.

“Under the MCA constitution, there is no time limit for a fresh election,” he said.

Kong, who is also the Perak MCA chairman, said all central committee members were matured party leaders and they should know what they were doing.

“They cannot force people to resign or prevent anybody from resigning,” he added.

Zambry scared to call for polls because of Allah row

Wong Choon Mei, Harakah Daily

Umno Mentri Besar Zambry Kadir is afraid to call for snap polls in Perak because of Prime Minister Najib Razak’s blunder over the Allah issue, said PAS leader Nizar Jamaluddin.

“They miscalculated badly and it has backfired. They thought it would get the Malays all riled up against the non-Muslims but it was a major blunder,” Nizar told Harakahdaily.

“Now not only the non-Muslims are angry with Umno but the Malays are also upset at the way the Allah issue has been twisted by unscrupulous politicians who are so corrupt, they dare to openly go against the teachings of the Quran.”

Mammoth Youth gathering at Larut

Perak, the second largest state in Malaysia, has a population more than 2 million, of which 54 percent or 1.1 million are Malay, 32 percent are Chinese, 12 percent Indian and the rest other races.

Pressure is mounting on Umno and Zambry to dissolve the state legislative assembly ahead of a February 9 deadline, when the Federal Court is due to deliver its verdict on who should be the rightful chief minister of Perak.

Zambry, who is also Pangkor assemblyman, has already hinted that there will not be any snap elections. Yet he has been busily organizing talks and seminars both in Perak and overseas to drum up support for his party.

As for Nizar, his PAS party is already working full throttle on getting its election machinery into top gear. On Sunday, more than 10 thousand PAS Youth members gathered in Kubu Gajah, Larut to hear Nizar and vice presidents Mahfuz Omar and Salahuddin Ayub speak.

They also took a solemn pledge to defend the democratic rights of the Perak people, to work to ensure that PAS and the Pakatan Rakyat wins the state elections and that Nizar is restored as the rightful Mentri Besar and Pakatan the rightful state government.

PAS ulamaks to set the facts right

Indeed, a dispute over whether the word Allah can be used by non-Muslims to describe God has become the latest hot topic in Malaysia.

PM Najib’s Umno has taken the stand that Allah is for Muslims only. It has been widely accused of instigating a spate of violence and desecration against places of worship in the country.

According to the core committee of ulamaks who govern the Islamic-based PAS, the word Allah can be used by non-Muslims provided that guidelines are put in place to prevent its misuse and abuse.

“Umno thinks it can get Malay support by politicizing the Allah issue. But their stand is against our religious teachings,” Nizar said.

“Our ulamak (religious experts) together with our Pakatan Rakyat friends will go down the line, into each and every small village in rural Perak to explain the matter and to set the facts correctly. Justice and the truth will win the day. And this is what Najib and Zambry are afraid of.”

PAS to open up fully to non-Muslims in 5 years

Wong Choon Mei, Harakah Daily

PAS has set itself a five-year target to fully open its doors to members of all races and religions so long as they are Malaysians and are determined to champion the party’s Islamic cause.

“Definitely, PAS will stay an Islamic party,” Mujahid Ysof Rawa, chairman of the PAS National Unity Committee, told Harakahdaily.

“But we recognize we are also a multiracial country. So we hope within five years’ time, we will be able to iron out all the kinks and invite all the races and religions to be PAS members so long as they understand and fully support our cause.”

Last year, PAS endorsed separate constitution allowing its Supporters Club - its longstanding non-Muslim wing - to become a Supporters Congress. The upgrade is significant because it gives greater rights to the non-Muslims, including additional platforms for them to play a more active role in party activities.

According to Mujahid, the Congress’s steering committee held its first meeting last week. The party plans an official launch in April. Vice-president Salahuddin Ayub has already been named its adviser.

“Mind you, the Congress is already officially a wing in the party. The constitution has been accepted by the PAS central committee and it is all systems go,” said Mujahid.

“What is going to happen in April is just a launch to make it known that our Club has been upgraded to a full-fledged Congress and if all goes well, in five years’ time, the non-Muslim wing can be fully assimilated into the party proper.”

PAS for All

Members of the Supporters Congress will be able to participate at the party’s muktamar or annual meetings as special representatives. Congress leaders will be elected at the federal, state and district levels but these will be ineligible to either stand for or elect the supreme leadership in PAS.

The Congress will also be formed at the national, state, and district levels but will not extend to individual branches. It will be headed by a leader, who will in turn be aided by a deputy; five vice-leaders; a secretary; an assistant secretary; a treasurer; and a committee of 18. It will also incorporate its own Youth and Women’s wings.

PAS fielded non-Muslim candidates at the 2008 general election. Its Supporters Club was formed in 2004 and has over 20,000 members comprising various races including Indians, Chinese, Siamese, and Iban.

“The politics of communalism and racism are not only outdated but they are wrong in principle and against the teachings of Islam,” said Mujahid.

“We have to evolve a new model whether all stakeholders in the country can participate in PAS but without PAS losing its Islamic backbone and focus. Can it be done? Certainly, we believe so. Look at our Supporters Club. That is already a reality and has been very successful, so much so we have upgraded it to a Congress. Now we want the Congress to get going while we prepare for the final step. I am sure we can do it, PAS can be for all.”

KJ: It's all cyber lies

Honeymah Dylyani, Malaysian Mirror

Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin has refuted reports in cyberspace and opposition papers that his members want him out.

He said there was no resolution from the Youth executive council meeting last week for him to step down, adding: "That's a spin from my detractors in cyberspace."

He further tweetered: "At least my excos do not call me a dictator without class in public."

This is an apparent jibe against Penang Chief Minister and DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng, who was ridiculed in the media by MPs Zahrain Hashim (Bayan Baru) and Tan Tee Beng (Nibong Tebal).

Zahrain had called the CM a 'dictator, a chauvinist and a communist' while Tan had labelled Lim 'a leader without class who practises vengeful politics.'

Not in tune with Najib?

An article that appeared in some blogs as well as on Harakahdaily, the PAS-owned news portal, stated that some Umno Youth members attending the wing's executive committee meeting during the weekend had asked Khairy to step down.

The article said several members pointed out that Khairy was not toeing the line of the 1Malaysia administration of Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.

It further speculated that two-thirds of the members would resign to pave the way for fresh polls in the wing.

The following are excerpts of Khairy's comments in his twitter-conversation with the Malaysian Mirror, which asked about the issue.

Najib, in his maiden address as party presiednt at the Umno general assembly...is Khairy out of tune with the PM's wishes?

"There was no resolution for me to step down. That's a spin from my detractors in cyberspace.

"We had a frank, open discussion about the direction we're taking and the programmes for the year. Isn't that what meetings are for?

"At least my excos do not call me a dictator with no class in public...yet."

Limit authority, that's all

In the midst of the conversation, the following comments were received from a fellow twitter:

"All these accusations of abuse of power, dictatorship are missing the point.

"Just introduce legislations to limit authority.

"(In Malay) I feel your fight in Umno, if it has not yet ended, will be resolved for you.

"You need the VPs to help you, at least.

"(In Malay) Before this, Hisham (former Umno Youth head Hishammuddin Hussein) said Umno Youth wants Khairy.

"Now, we do not hear a word from him. You look dead in the water."

Deputy chief clarifies

Meanwhile, Umno Youth deputy chief Razali Ibrahim posted in Facebook his comments on the leadership issue, denying that two-thirds of the wing's executive committee wants Khairy to step down and make way for a new leader.

"What happened was, they wanted to be involved in doing more for the party.

"Maybe, they were misunderstood and used by certain people against Umno Youth for their (the opponents') own gain,”

"What was said is this: if we are not capable of carrying out our duties, we should step down.

"It is not just about the leaders but als all the exco members.

Hisham's stand on the issue

"That was a challenge. It's not like what is said in the blogs, which tried to show that all the excos wanted to resign."

Razali also explained the matter to a student group from the Korea Umno Club at the Umno head office here on Sunday.

In Johor Baru, Hishammuddin said calls by some bloggers for Khairy to quit his post were not accurate.

"I understand that the bloggers involved do not know head or tail about what was discussed at the recent Umno Youth executive committee meeting," the Home Minister and Umno-vice-pressident told reporters Sunday.

He did not dismiss the possibility that the reports were made due to some people's personal interest. -

Karpal on the DAP

thenutgraph.com

DAP chairperson Karpal Singh is not one to shy from criticising his own political comrades and allies. For him, principles come first. And because of this, the fiery veteran has had no qualms about putting his colleagues in their places, often giving fodder to media speculation that the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) is on the verge of collapse.

There was the time when Karpal told Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to quit the PR for promoting a culture of party-hopping. He's also lambasted fellow party leaders, secretary-general Lim Guan Eng and adviser Lim Kit Siang, for not supporting his anti-hopping stand.

He has consistently resisted the idea of an Islamic state, calling on both PAS and Anwar to come clean on exactly what one would look like. And he called PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang an "embarrassment" over proposed unity talks with Umno.


Karpal, sitting between PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat (left) and
party president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang at the PR's first convention on 19 Dec 2009

In the second and final part of an interview with The Nut Graph conducted in Kuala Lumpur on 20 Jan 2010, Karpal talks about the DAP's way forward with PAS and PKR.

TNG: About the DAP. In a Chinese-based party, what is your influence as a non-Chinese [Malaysian] party leader? Are you what gives the party its fighting streak?

Karpal Singh: I don't think so. I get my strong character from the party. I joined this party after the 13 May 1969 riots. I was practising law in Alor Star at the time. I thought something had to be done about what was going on. 13 May was a terrible tragedy. What was needed was a united multiracial society, which I thought could only be brought about by a multiracial party, and not the race-based parties of the time.

No doubt the DAP gets the most support from the Chinese [Malaysians], but that doesn't make it a Chinese party. We don't have as many Malay [Malaysians] as we want, which is a handicap to us. Somehow or other, the Malay [Malaysian] mind has been poisoned against the DAP. But I think Malay [Malaysians] now are changing.

In any event, that is being complemented by Malay [Malaysians] in Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and PAS. It does not matter whether they join us or PKR as long as they are in Pakatan (Rakyat). We have always admitted that it is difficult for us to make much of a headway. In 1999, we lost some seats in the general election over the Islamic state issue. (DAP parliamentary leader Lim) Kit Siang and I held very strong seats but we lost. But it is different now, with the three parties coming together.

What do you think Pakatan's weaknesses are?

We have to be cohesive. We must be very united on major issues, and that is now true to a great extent. In 1999, our association with PAS was considered the kiss of death. It's no more now.

We also have to be very careful with who we take in. Pakatan is popular and we don't want opportunists to come into the party. There are a lot of people frustrated with the BN. Even if they are principled, we should wait for at least two years before entrusting them with leadership.

What are the priority areas in Pakatan's common policy framework that can be implemented now?

Pakatan has been consistent on most things in the framework except for local council elections, which is a thorn. In our election manifesto we said that the first thing we would do would be to restore local government elections. This is not in the common policy framework in the manner which it ought to be.

Though we did not have a unanimous agreement, there is progress on the matter, and I think we can come to an agreement before the next general election. But an agreement is one thing. Whether you can lawfully hold local government elections is another. Can we hold it in view of the legislation against it? To overcome this, we must have federal power to make the necessary amendments.

On the DAP's "middle Malaysia" approach to voters, is this a rebranding exercise?

Fundamentally, we have always been about a Malaysian Malaysia. To woo the middle ground, you have to have that concept. "Middle Malaysia" is about identifying the silent majority and reaching out to them, especially the young, whose thinking is entirely different, even among Malay [Malaysian] youth. By identifying them, we're zeroing in on them and giving them the message that we are with them. This group will make the difference in the end.

Malaysia’s Courts In The Dock Over Anwar Trial

From Reuters
By Razak Ahmad – Analysis

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) – Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim heads for trial on Tuesday on a charge of sodomy, placing the country’s courts under scrutiny again after his doubtful conviction for the same offence almost a decade ago.

Anwar was tried first on corruption charges and then for sodomy after his sacking as Deputy Prime Minister in 1998 amid a political feud with then premier Mahathir Mohamad.

His case drew a chorus of international criticism with then-U.S. Vice President Al Gore saying at the time that the trial “mocked international standards of justice.”

Although Malaysia’s top court ultimately overturned the conviction, doubts remain as to whether the 62-year-old Anwar, who represents the biggest political threat to the government that has run Malaysia for 52 years, will get a fair trial.

This time, he is charged with sodomising a male aide in a trial that has been dubbed “Sodomy 2″ by the Malaysian media.

“For political cases, the public has grave concerns about the independence of the judiciary,” said Lim Chee Wee, vice president of the Bar Council of Malaysia. “There is also the upcoming Anwar ‘Sodomy 2′ trial where the presently available evidence suggests selective prosecution.”

Malaysia’s government has a long history of curbing the power of the judiciary, starting in 1988 when Mahathir sacked the country’s top judge amid a political row that could have seen the man who became the country’s longest serving premier removed.

The Anwar trials further undermined trust in the courts and public confidence in the judiciary ebbed further after a judicial appointments fixing scandal in 2007, prompting the government to initiate a judicial reform effort.

Court rulings against the government in recent months have provided a glimmer of hope the judiciary has not been completely emasculated. One on December 31 supported the rights of Christians to use the word “Allah” for God.

But with the National Front government battling to reassert its control over this Southeast Asian country, Anwar’s trial may be too politically sensitive for a fair hearing, said Zaid Ibrahim, a former law minister who was tasked with judicial reform but who quit the government in 2008.

“Well, I don’t think much has changed (since Anwar’s last trial),” said Zaid, now a member of the opposition. “When we talk about judicial independence we are talking about politically sensitive cases involving ministers and the government.”

The government has denied any interference and has promised that Anwar would receive a fair trial.

NO LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE

Mahathir’s attack on the judiciary in the 1980s came after he narrowly survived a challenge to his leadership. While there is no leadership challenge to current Prime Minister Najib Razak, he is struggling to rebuild confidence in his own political party.

Najib’s United Malays National Organization, and the 13-party National Front coalition that it leads conceded control of five states and lost its two-thirds parliamentary majority in national and state elections in 2008, their worst ever showing.

Voters, upset over rising corruption, failed reform pledges and increasing complaints of minority marginalization, have since handed the opposition victories in seven out of nine by-elections held since the national polls.

Promises by Najib to end corruption and to rebuild the multi- ethnic nature of the ruling coalition that relied in the past on support from ethnic Chinese and Indian voters have been damaged by a multi-billion dollar graft scandal at a port and by attacks on churches over the “Allah” row.

Data from the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report show Malaysia’s judicial independence global rankings fell to 53rd place in 2009 from 47th place in 2008.

Its scores are well below regional leaders Hong Kong and Singapore which ranked 14th and 19th respectively, undermining Najib’s bid to woo new foreign investment to help diversify the country’s export-dependent economy.

Foreign bondholders in the scandal-plagued Port Klang Free Zone have sought a government guarantee for the bonds, fearing a Malaysian court could invalidate their claims due to the issue of fake guarantees for the bonds.

Malaysia has made some progress in cleaning up its commercial courts, dogged by complaints of delays and inefficiency, said the Bar Council’s Lim, who noted that trial disposal rates had shot up to 597 in 2009 from 87 in 2008.

Efforts to reduce trial times drew praise from Malaysian International Chamber of Commerce and Industry Executive President Stewart Forbes whose body represents 1,000 members with over 110 billion ringgit ($32.23 billion) of investments here.

“Certainly, it’s fair to say that over the last 18 to 24 months, there has been a marked improvement in that aspect of the judiciary,” he said.

However, businesses remain concerned by poor perceptions of the overall quality of the judiciary.

“It may not simply be because one or other particular case, but unfortunately at the moment and over the last few years in Malaysia, the judiciary has been pulled into a large number of elements of debate vis-a-vis a whole range of court cases and issues,” Forbes noted.

ALLAH CASE HAILED

As well as the improved trial times for commercial cases, some lower courts have recently exercised their independence and ruled against the government in politically sensitive cases.

The recent ruling on the “Allah” case that allowed a Catholic newspaper to use the word in its Malay language editions has been hailed by critics, including Anwar, as a sign of judicial independence.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court recently reversed a ban on a book of essays on Islam and women’s rights which the government contended contradicted official teachings on Islam and in May last year, it ruled a government takeover of the opposition-ruled north eastern state of Perak was illegal.

Critics say such rulings are rare and at times get overturned by the higher courts, as was the case in the Perak verdict which is now before the country’s highest court, the Federal Court.

“At the lower level courts, there are independent minded judges but at the higher level courts, we’ll have to wait and see because there are lots of issues still not resolved,” said Zaid, the former law minister.

(Reporting by Razak Ahmad; Editing by David Chance and Bill Tarrant)

Girls Just Want to Have Fun: Polyandry in Malaysia

Asia Sentinel,

ImageSauce for the goose: two daddies for Habiba?

If it hadn't been for my research into polygamy for Asia Sentinel recently, (see: Polygamy in Malaysia), I would never have stumbled across one of Kuala Lumpur's best kept secrets -- polyandry, one woman married to several men.
While conducting interviews, I met 27-year-old Sakina (not her real name). We discussed her previous polygamous marriage to a datuk, the lowest rung of Malaysia's profusion of royal titles, and I could sense deep-seated unease. But before long, on an absolute promise of anonymity, she divulged her shocking story. She revealed that she had long wanted to share her secret.

Earlier, her warm greeting, liquid brown eyes and ready smile revealed little. Her pretty face, framed by her tudung, displayed no anxiety. It was the clenching and unclenching of her small hands, nearly hidden in the folds of the baju kurung of this small and elegantly dressed woman, that betrayed her initial unease.

And yet the modern but religious Muslim woman experienced a cathartic release as she unburdened herself. She admitted that what she did was unlawful. If Malaysians are unsettled by socially tolerated polygamy, then polyandry would doubtless cause an unprecedented firestorm.

What started out for Sakina as a whirlwind romantic fairytale wedding to the datuk ended abruptly. They met at the duty-free outlet where she worked, as she helped choose perfumes for his first wife. After a brief period of wooing, convinced that his love for her was genuine, they flew into Thailand for the wedding-and-honeymoon. Her first trip overseas. But before many months later, his conjugal visits became less frequent, calls went unanswered and rumors abounded that a younger, fresher-faced version was the datuk's newest plaything. She resolved never to be duped or dumped again.

With the rent unpaid and her savings gone, she was fortunate to return to her previous job. Her marriage had not been registered in Malaysia, which left her no avenue for legal recourse. She vowed never to let her head rule her heart again.

For months, she underwent an enforced period of celibacy as an abandoned wife. But waiting for another man (and sex) is like waiting for a bus. You stand for ages, then several come along together. First, she met a man who worked on offshore rigs. Again, they met at the duty-free counter. Then she attracted another; a pilot. Neither was married. One had gone through a long and acrimonious divorce. The younger, more sensitive man had been jilted for an older wealthy man. Both craved love, companionship and stability.

Sakina's dates, each aware of the other's presence, both proposed. Undecided, she took her time choosing. In the end, she decided to share them. For Sakina, this was serendipitous. Significantly, she was convinced of the gender equality inherent in Islam as it says in the Qur'an: "I shall not lose sight of the labor of any of you who labors in My way, be it man or woman; each of you is equal to the other (3:195)". Men and women had the same religious and moral duties and responsibilities. If men were entitled to four wives, she should have four husbands, she said.

In truth, Sakina said, she found that polyandry empowered her and had great economic and social benefits. Wise from her previous bad experience, she drew up a marriage contract and purchased a house in her name, funded by both men. Marrying abroad meant that her husband, whichever one she chose, need only pay the penalty and fine for late registration if challenged for marital proof. Being previously linked with the datuk afforded a degree of protection as few dared confront her, thinking it might offend him.

The allowance from two husbands provided a luxurious lifestyle. Everyone was happy. The husbands spent less, had more available spare cash, felt less burdened with chores and spent more time on recreational activities, like golf to keep out of her hair. Even the maids kept silent for they were handsomely rewarded. The affordable large house meant ample rooms for each man to personalize. The gated estate full of expatriates helped. She even enrolled at college. As each husband's work took him away for long stretches, they arranged a rota so that at least one of them was at home. On the rare occasions when both were around, they practiced restraint, forebearance and discipline. It was a healthy husband-life balance. Living in metropolitan Kuala Lumpur, a city of lonely people, anonymity was easy. Other people were too absorbed in their own lives.

Significantly, it is the woman in polyandry who decides on family size. With birth control, Sakina said, she felt she could space her pregnancies within her natural child-bearing cycle, or even choose which husband to father the child. Doubts about polyandry only surfaced when asked about starting a family. Her guarded response, “I'll cross that bridge when I come to it,” was quickly brushed aside when she said that paternity tests for determining clear lines of succession would be used, should her husbands insist on actual parentage.
Women may be terrible with maps and navigation, but are more emotionally intelligent and brilliant at multitasking. Sakina says her proclivity to mothering and trust in her womanly instincts makes her husbands more attentive and appreciative of her.

In her opinion, the two sexes respond differently to competition. Men try harder to outperform the other, women become jealous or clingy, which was great for her sex life. Was she speaking from past experience? Having husbands who were not underfoot 24/7 helped. When at home, they seemed more focused. Others could misconstrue this as men cowering from the alpha female, perhaps?

Polyandry, rare in European and Asian civilizations, thrived in inhospitable places like Tibet and Siberia. The Navars from Malabar, in India, once practiced a version of it. Polyandry developed because of economics and convenience for the man. He couldn't afford a wife, there was insufficient labor and he wanted to keep land within the family. Isolated Tibetan communities still practice it. Brothers from one family would marry one woman and take turns to herd sheep and trade. Smaller families meant property remained undivided.
The closest that Malaysia has to polyandry is the Adat Pepatih in Negri Sembilan. Adat Pepatih or matrilineal succession meant that inheritance, principally land ownership, was passed to the subject's female relatives to the total exclusion of males. But the conflict between religion and tradition resulted in Malays abandoning the practice.

However, the way modern society has evolved may make polyandry more suitable than previously thought. It boils down to society's acceptance. In today's world, more highly educated and skilled working women are comfortable with their single status. In fact, according to a recent article in The Economist, women will very soon become a majority in the American workforce and breaking through the glass ceiling. Other countries can't be far behind. Financial independence means a scarcity of women in the marriage pool. In China and India, where amniocentesis has meant that girl babies are aborted, boys vastly outnumber girls. Men may be forced to turn to polyandry as an alternative to celibacy, prostitution or homosexuality.

If men claim that women are difficult to arouse and satisfy, polyandry makes good sexual sense. As sex researchers claim women achieve multiple orgasms in a short space of time, polyandry is ideal. Men view sex as a physical activity, women associate it with emotion. The American comic Billy Crystal once observed that women need a reason to make love, men just need a place. But men should never doubt a woman's sexuality, her sexual needs, or even her ability to serve several men. Wives with many lovers do it. Prostitutes make a profession from it. Neither should men doubt middle-aged women's sexual needs. Notice how toy-boys brag in the Malaysian papers about requests to accompany middle-aged ladies on overseas trips. Women can be ruthless in and out of bed. They are motivated and accept challenges, both in the boardroom and the bedroom.

If marriage in Islam is based on mutual peace, love and compassion, then the polyandrous marriage has all of these and more. Women are more astute in their choice of partners, Sakina said, despite her first disaster with the datuk. She feels she got it right the second time, or, if you prefer, the second and third simultaneously. Women are better judges of character -- they place more emphasis on long-term needs like companionship and stability. Equality in Islam should mean just that – equal treatment for both men and women. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Will conservative Muslims feel that way or will the men be furious at their bruised male egos when their women demand more than one husband?

Granted that men and women are created differently, the nurturing tendencies in women make them more predisposed to rearing happy, strong and stable families. There is little evidence that polyandry destroys the family structure or brings chaos and disintegration. The argument that a polyandrous woman is full of lust and is surrendering to her whims, thus leading to communal chaos, is incorrect.

So, having come across Sakina, one wonders if there are more like her. From Sakina's experience, it appears there ought to be. It would certainly make women happy.

Mariam Mokhtar is a real person. Sakina is not. But we thought we might give the datuks something to think about.

Government Gives Attention To All Schools - Muhyiddin

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 2 (Bernama) -- The government will continue to give attention to all schools in the country, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said.

Muhyiddin who is also Education Minister said the 20 schools chosen as High Performance Schools (SBT) recently did not mean that the schools would get attention while the others were neglected.

"As the Education Minister, I want to see progress in all schools," he said in the "Soal Jawab Bersama Timbalan Perdana Menteri" programe by TV3 Monday night.

He said schools in rural areas faced shortage in trained teaching staff and infrastructure and that SBT was created to recognise and make them models to other schools.

Of the 20 schools, some were not expected to make but they showed it could be achieved with leadership, efficency and hard work.

The 20 High Performance Schools announced were 14 secondary and six primary schools from all over the country.

Muhyiddin said the government decision to change the teaching of science and mathematic from English did not mean that the universal language was being neglected.

He said several new initiatives were being planned to upgrade the teaching and command of English in schools.

It include the recruitment of 15 English trainers from overseas and 360 "master teachers" from Britain and Australia. There were also plans to increase English hours in class.

On the view that he was more a Deputy Prime Minister than Education Minister, Muhyiddin said it was only perception from the people who saw the Deputy Prime Minister's post as more influential.

"I don't think that I am not focusing on my duty as Education Minister. This is inaccurate."

Muhyiddin said the children's future would be bleak if certain groups continued to politicise educational issues.

YGR: What would you do if you were PM?

by Nathaniel Tan

I recently wrote about Your Grandfather’s Road (which had a really fun launch last Wednesday night btw), which may be the world’ first crowd sourced movie :) They recently put up my little post, in answer to a simple question: What would you do if you were PM?

This is a website and movie built around your comments, so here’s your chance to let loose all the crazy ideas you might’ve had, and tell the world how you would better Malaysia :)

Monday, 1 February 2010

Thaipusam hunger strike fails to excite

Nirshavin (6 months) hole in heart appeals for help of from poor Indians for an operation estimated to cost RM 458,000.00.

Nirshavin (6 months) hole in heart appeals for help of from poor Indians for an operation estimated to cost RM 458,000.00. (Makkal Osai 27/12/09 on page 3). The UMNO government has allocated RM 48 Million for Welfare help but this does not reach the poor and sickly Indians.

P. Uthayakumar

nirshavin

Kuala Ketil Hindu cemetery destroyed, 500 angry families (MN 13/12/09 at front page)

kuala-ketil

Indian poor 8 month old Kuberan suffering from blood clots. He needs RM 40,000.00 for surgery

Indian poor 8 month old Kuberan suffering from blood clots. He needs RM 40,000.00 for surgery (Makkal Osai 27/12/09 at page 4). But yet again Kuberan’s mother has to go a begging from the pre existing Indian poor as the UMNO led government would not help even from the RM 48 Million allocation for Welfare help in the 2010 National Budget.

P. Uthayakumar

indian-poor2

PAS: Ku Li has always been consistent on oil royalty

By Adib Zalkapli - The Malaysian Insider


KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 1 — PAS secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali today dismissed claims by Umno leaders that Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah (picture) had contradicted himself by supporting Kelantan’s oil royalty claim.

Mustafa added that when the Terengganu government brought the Federal government to court in 2001 for withdrawing oil royalty payments, Razaleigh was willing to testify for the state.

The Gua Musang Umno division chief — at a public rally in Kota Bahru last week — backed Kelantan’s demand for oil royalty.

Umno leaders have slammed Razaleigh for supporting Kelantan’s claim, saying that the Kelantanese prince was being inconsistent as he had supported the Federal government for withdrawing Terengganu’s oil royalty in 2000.

“Ku Li showed greater commitment then by expressing his willingness to go to court,” said Mustafa who was a Terengganu executive councillor when PAS ruled the state from 1999 to 2004.

Mustafa said Razaleigh also attended a forum in 2008 on Terengganu’s demand for oil royalty to be reinstated.

The Federal government, led by Tun Mahathir Mohamad, decided to revoke the oil royal just months after PAS took over the state in November 1999. The state has been receiving compassionate payment since then.

The case is still ongoing and early last year the state received some RM400 million in oil royalty from the Federal government and is still demanding payment of another RM2.79 billion.

“In the last state assembly, the state government had declared its commitment not to withdraw the case until negotiations is over,” said Mustafa on the status of the case.

“It is my responsibility to present the facts, as I do not want Ku Li to be victimised,” he said.

On whether the Kelantan government should take the matter to court, Mustafa said it is better for the state not to do so as it will stop public debate on the subject.

“From our experience in Terengganu, after 10 years the case is still unresolved,” said Mustafa.

3 Selangor Pakatan reps hauled up over discrepancies

By Neville Spykerman - The Malaysian Insider

SHAH ALAM, Feb 1 – Three Selangor Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers will face a state watchdog committee this morning to explain spending discrepancies in constituency allocations.

The Special Select Committee for Accountability, Competency and Transparency (Selcat) have called assemblymen Ronnie Liu (Pandamaran), Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad (Sri Setia) and Shuhaimi Shafiei (Sri Muda) to detail their expenses for their respective constituencies.

Liu of DAP, who is state executive councillor for local government and research, is scheduled to be the first to testify this morning.

Nik Nazmi, who is the political secretary to the Selangor Mentri Besar, and Shuhaimi, both from PKR, will testify later.

Malaysia’s courts in the dock over Anwar trial

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 1 — Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim heads for trial on tomorrow on a charge of sodomy, placing the country’s courts under scrutiny again after his doubtful conviction for the same offence almost a decade ago.

Anwar was tried first on corruption charges and then for sodomy after his sacking as Deputy Prime Minister in 1998 amid a political feud with then premier Mahathir Mohamad.

His case drew a chorus of international criticism with then-US Vice President Al Gore saying at the time that the trial “mocked international standards of justice”.

Although Malaysia’s top court ultimately overturned the conviction, doubts remain as to whether the 62-year-old Anwar, who represents the biggest political threat to the government that has run Malaysia for 52 years, will get a fair trial.

This time, he is charged with sodomising a male aide in a trial that has been dubbed “Sodomy 2” by the Malaysian media.

“For political cases, the public has grave concerns about the independence of the judiciary,” said Lim Chee Wee, vice president of the Bar Council of Malaysia. “There is also the upcoming Anwar ‘Sodomy 2’ trial where the presently available evidence suggests selective prosecution.”

Malaysia’s government has a long history of curbing the power of the judiciary, starting in 1988 when Tun Dr Mahathir sacked the country’s top judge amid a political row that could have seen the man who became the country’s longest serving premier removed.

The Anwar trials further undermined trust in the courts and public confidence in the judiciary ebbed further after a judicial appointments fixing scandal in 2007, prompting the government to initiate a judicial reform effort.

Court rulings against the government in recent months have provided a glimmer of hope the judiciary has not been completely emasculated. One on Dec 31 supported the rights of Christians to use the word “Allah” for God.

But with the National Front government battling to reassert its control over this Southeast Asian country, Datuk Seri Anwar’s trial may be too politically sensitive for a fair hearing, said Zaid Ibrahim, a former law minister who was tasked with judicial reform but who quit the government in 2008.

“Well, I don’t think much has changed (since Anwar’s last trial),” said Zaid, now a member of the opposition. “When we talk about judicial independence we are talking about politically sensitive cases involving ministers and the government.”

The government has denied any interference and has promised that Anwar would receive a fair trial.

Tun Dr Mahathir’s attack on the judiciary in the 1980s came after he narrowly survived a challenge to his leadership. While there is no leadership challenge to current Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, he is struggling to rebuild confidence in his own political party.

Najib’s United Malays National Organisation, and the 13-party National Front coalition that it leads conceded control of five states and lost its two-thirds parliamentary majority in national and state elections in 2008, their worst ever showing.

Voters, upset over rising corruption, failed reform pledges and increasing complaints of minority marginalisation, have since handed the opposition victories in seven out of nine by-elections held since the national polls.

Promises by Najib to end corruption and to rebuild the multi- ethnic nature of the ruling coalition that relied in the past on support from ethnic Chinese and Indian voters have been damaged by a multi-billion dollar graft scandal at a port and by attacks on churches over the “Allah” row.

Data from the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report show Malaysia’s judicial independence global rankings fell to 53rd place in 2009 from 47th place in 2008.

Its scores are well below regional leaders Hong Kong and Singapore which ranked 14th and 19th respectively, undermining Datuk Seri Najib’s bid to woo new foreign investment to help diversify the country’s export-dependent economy.

Foreign bondholders in the scandal-plagued Port Klang Free Zone have sought a government guarantee for the bonds, fearing a Malaysian court could invalidate their claims due to the issue of fake guarantees for the bonds.

Malaysia has made some progress in cleaning up its commercial courts, dogged by complaints of delays and inefficiency, said the Bar Council’s Lim, who noted that trial disposal rates had shot up to 597 in 2009 from 87 in 2008.

Efforts to reduce trial times drew praise from Malaysian International Chamber of Commerce and Industry Executive President Stewart Forbes whose body represents 1,000 members with over RM110 billion ringgit of investments here.

“Certainly, it’s fair to say that over the last 18 to 24 months, there has been a marked improvement in that aspect of the judiciary,” he said.

However, businesses remain concerned by poor perceptions of the overall quality of the judiciary.

“It may not simply be because one or other particular case, but unfortunately at the moment and over the last few years in Malaysia, the judiciary has been pulled into a large number of elements of debate vis-a-vis a whole range of court cases and issues,” Forbes noted.

As well as the improved trial times for commercial cases, some lower courts have recently exercised their independence and ruled against the government in politically sensitive cases.

The recent ruling on the “Allah” case that allowed a Catholic newspaper to use the word in its Malay language editions has been hailed by critics, including Anwar, as a sign of judicial independence.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court recently reversed a ban on a book of essays on Islam and women’s rights which the government contended contradicted official teachings on Islam and in May last year, it ruled a government takeover of the opposition-ruled north eastern state of Perak was illegal.

Critics say such rulings are rare and at times get overturned by the higher courts, as was the case in the Perak verdict which is now before the country’s highest court, the Federal Court.

“At the lower level courts, there are independent minded judges but at the higher level courts, we’ll have to wait and see because there are lots of issues still not resolved,” said Zaid, the former law minister. — Reuters

PAS to remain in Pakatan despite crisis

By Adib Zalkapli- The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 1 — PAS secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali (picture) said today the Islamist party will not leave Pakatan Rakyat (PR) despite the crisis between leaders from both PKR and DAP.

“The matter does not arise. We talked about this yesterday and we were briefed... the matter has been referred to PKR’S disciplinary committee,” Mustafa told reporters at a press conference.

He was responding to a question about whether the bickering between DAP and PKR in Penang would make PAS review its position in the three-party coalition.

The latest crisis started when PKR’s Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Hashim called Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng a “dictator” and “communist-minded.”

The decision to refer Zahrain to the disciplinary committee was made by PKR’s supreme council and was also discussed at PR leadership meeting yesterday.

Zahrain is also said to be leading a group of would-be defectors from PKR to help Barisan Nasional (BN) regain its two-thirds majority in Parliament.

Apart from Zahrain, Datuk Zaid Ibrahim who had criticised the party for not taking action against Zulkifli Noordin for lodging a police report against PAS MP Khalid Samad over the ‘Allah’ row, will also face the disciplinary committee with the Kulim-Bandar Baru MP.

On the PR disciplinary committee, Mustafa said it will only play an advisory role at this stage.

“The term of reference is yet to be drawn but there is a general guideline to advise the parties on the cases,” said Mustafa.

When asked about the allegation by PAS Youth executive committee member Abdullah Karim that the party has been slow in handling other disciplinary cases, Mustafa said he is still studying the report lodged by Abdullah.

“I will call him in a day or two,” said Mustafa.

Disciplinary cases are first referred to the secretary-general before they are forwarded to the disciplinary committee.

Differentiating Pus from Blood

I vaguely remember reading an article on noble and sportsmanlike behaviour and its relation to culture some time ago. In it the writer described the laments of a mother in ancient China. She moaned that her sons will now all be killed because a warlord – some Marquis or other, was willing to suck the pus from the wounds of his soldiers. She thought that her sons would be so moved by such a noble act that they would willingly give their lives for their lord and master.

By batsman

These days, unfortunately, modern Malaysian politicians are unable to differentiate pus from blood.

Let me help.

Malaysian politicians need to differentiate good from bad and loyal from disloyal supporters. This ability is critical not just for success but necessary for survival.

If a person is basically decent and loyal, he is worth keeping as a good friend even if he has ideas and manners of thinking that contradict yours. That he is willing to contradict you means that he has some integrity. Such differences of thought, values and ideas may be discussed and mutually understood and accepted if good decent brotherly feelings exist in both.

Unfortunately some relatively decent people may suffer from weakness of arrogance. They are willing to make police reports or public accusations against their own friends. This shows that they may start to lack brotherly feelings and have no respect for their friends, or they may just be making a mistake owning to over-weaning arrogance. Such people are even more difficult to deal with. They are on the brink of breaking up the friendship.

To keep the discussion simple, I am not even touching on the problems of chemistry yet.

On the other side, there are people who are dishonest and self-serving even if they pretend to be a good friend. They may appear to support your proposals 100% and offer unending praise all the time. These people need to be watched very carefully. That is why there is the saying that one must keep one’s friends close and enemies even closer.

They reveal their character by small actions, the way they grab goodies and the way they treat others on a daily basis. By carefully watching their behaviour, one gets a reasonable idea as to their character – whether they are self-serving or basically decent.

All these mean that politics is not just a matter of debating public statements and matters that are public knowledge. There are a myriad of knowledge that is based on personal observation and assessment. Granted this is not very democratic, but it is a natural fact of life. That is why if one wants to make a difference, it is best to get deeply involved by joining a political party. If not, the next best way is to make contributions in other ways, not just shouting curses and obscenities.

I suppose if people within a political party are basically decent and loyal, it is a source of strength. The blood that flows within is clean and free of disease.

Unfortunately political parties do get infected with self-serving people now and again. They will form pus filled boils, sores and pimples inside the body of the party. For the party to be healthy, such pus must be removed. Again it is a fact of life that during the removal process, some blood may be lost.

Political leaders now need to make sure that the least amount of blood is lost. If too much is lost at a dangerous time, it may weaken the party to the extent it succumbs to well-timed external attacks by the enemy. The leaders must decide whether it is worthwhile to remove a small amount of pus at the cost of a lot of blood-letting at a dangerously critical time or to wait until the pimple becomes ripe and there is less chance of external attack or less blood lost because of the ripeness of the situation. The price to pay is that in delaying the excision of the pimple there is the need to stand the pain of the pimple still existing or maybe even growing within the body of the party.

Again all this means that there is a need for consultation and exchange of wisdom, judgement and opinions. Making unilateral public statements just confuses the situation more because it gets uninformed people into the argument and may cause even more blood to be lost in a “forced or badly timed” excision of an unripe pimple.

I guess being a good leader, one has to be a mother, a father, a brother, a friend, a consultant, a doctor, a motivator - sometimes even a good surgeon.

Anwar And Najib – Up Close and Very Revealing

In contrast to the mainstream media, the on-line portals Malaysiakini and Malaysia-Today chose a diametrically opposite tack. Malaysia-Today published both commentaries in full without any editorial comment. Its editors are confident of their readers’ intelligence to draw their own conclusions. If those mainstream editors wonder why their readership dwindles while those of Malaysiakini and Malaysia-Today soar, the answer is right there.

M. Bakri Musa

The side-by-side commentaries by Anwar Ibrahim and Najib Razak in the recent Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal illuminated a couple of salient points, in particular, the state of Malaysian journalism and the quality of our leadership.

Consider first Malaysian editors, specifically of the mainstream media. They missed the essential point that the best way to intelligently inform their readers is to present them with contrasting and opposing viewpoints, as illustrated by what The Journal did. Respect your readers’ intelligence and treat them like adults.

Bernama mentioned the Journal’s articles as a news item but referred only to Najib’s piece. Obviously the Bernama editors’ instinct was to please Najib and protect his image. They see themselves less as professional journalists and more as propagandists for the state. Their reaction was predictable.

That the cue from Bernama was quickly picked up by the other mainstream editors too did not surprise me. They are after all from the same mold. What grabbed my attention however, was what the Sun Daily did. I remember that paper as one that had the courage right from the beginning to be a tad independent, and its journalists less willing to genuflect to the powerful; hence its success despite its recent entry into the business.

The Sun merely reprinted Bernama’s piece, again with no mention of Anwar’s contrasting viewpoint. The Sun’s editors had access to both commentaries (they are available on-line) but chose to follow Bernama’s lead instead of their own editorial judgment. That reflects the challenges in maintaining journalistic integrity in an oppressive environment.

Then there is MCA-owned The Star. It did what cowards typically do: avoid the issue entirely. I am uncertain whether that is better than blatantly kowtow-ing to the emperor, as Bernama did.

As for The New Straits Times, an Umno newsletter masquerading as a daily, its behavior too was predictable. It did not directly report on the two commentaries, presumably deeming both not sufficiently newsworthy. That however, did not stop its editor Syed Nadzri from penning an editorial effusively praising Najib’s literary contribution.

“In approach, tenor and presumably intention,” Nadzri writes, “their articles went in practically opposite directions from the start — the prime minister taking a conciliatory, disarming style, as against the opposition leader’s fault-finding digressions.” What Nadzri calls ‘fault-finding digression’ is Anwar’s trying to elucidate, understand and then educate us on the many daunting problems confronting the nation.

Towards the end even Nadzri’s residuum of journalistic ethics pricked his conscience a bit, for he admitted that Najib’s commentary was indeed a “rah rah piece,” adding, “What else could anyone expect?” Such low expectations!

It would never occur to Nadzri and the others to consider republishing both commentaries; they are of interest to all Malaysians. Or better yet, do what the Journal did, invite contributors with varying viewpoints. While the Journal is an avowedly conservative paper (its editorials leave little doubt about that), its Op-Ed pages routinely carry views from the left and right; likewise, its news coverage. The unabashedly liberal, The New York Times counts among its regular commentators such conservatives as David Brooks. Unfortunately, the likes of Syed Nadzri are intellectually and professionally incapable of such a monumental shift in thinking.

In contrast to the mainstream media, the on-line portals Malaysiakini and Malaysia-Today chose a diametrically opposite tack. Malaysia-Today published both commentaries in full without any editorial comment. Its editors are confident of their readers’ intelligence to draw their own conclusions. If those mainstream editors wonder why their readership dwindles while those of Malaysiakini and Malaysia-Today soar, the answer is right there.

Top Billing For Anwar

The Journal gave Anwar’s commentary greater prominence; it appeared on top of the page. I agree with the Journal’s editorial judgment. By whatever criterion – persuasiveness, substance, clarity of thought, or most importantly, readability – Anwar’s piece clearly trumps Najib’s. No wonder those mainstream editors dared not carry both side by side; it would embarrass their patron!

Anwar exhorts us to rise above our parochial interests by recalling the great moments in our Islamic history where tolerance and acceptance of divergent viewpoints were venerated. Najib excuses our prejudices and intolerances on the grounds that those have always been part of human nature, thereby condoning if not encouraging those extremists with their “passionate” views.

Najib claims to be “appalled by the irresponsible and dangerous finger-pointing of a few politicians who put personal political interests … [and] try to score political points by hammering on sensitive issues.” He forgot that it was his Home Minister who started the mess with his needless bureaucratic intervention of a long-established practice. Talk about blatant pandering to the political base! Do not expect Najib to have second thoughts on that. Reflection, or for that matter taking responsibility, is not his strong suit.

Najib writes, “…[T]he values we hold dear – religious freedom, tolerance, peace and fairness—remain the bedrock of our nation.” Too bad he does not take that to heart. While Anwar excoriates Utusan Melayu, an UMNO-owned Malay language daily, for inflaming religious sentiments among Malays, Najib remains eerily silent. Many rightly perceive that as tacit endorsement and outright encouragement. One wonders just who is pandering to the ugly Malay mob.

Anwar invokes our Quran and traditions to push us towards our better selves; Najib was only too ready to dismiss and excuse those “extremists.”To Najib, the extremists, like the poor, will always be with us. There is not much that he could or would do.

The clarity of Anwar’s message was elegantly encapsulated in his very first sentence, “Malaysia has once again resurfaced in international headlines for the wrong reasons.” No one, not even Najib, could dispute that assertion. Anwar’s thesis sentence was crisp, clear and stated simply. It may be embarrassing to have that ugly reality exposed, but it would be a serious abrogation of responsibility for a leader not to address it, as Najib awkwardly tried to do.

It was difficult to ascertain Najib’s message; his essay was all over the place – mushy! This fits his leadership style: heavy on homilies, short on substance, and most of all, mushy. He would prefer that our ugly problems be swept under the carpet, to save the nation’s ‘honor,’ or at least his concept of it.

Through the Journal’s initiative we get to view our two leaders. In Anwar we have a leader in command of the situation, someone serious and fully cognizant of the dangers of fanning religious passions. He appeals to our better side to meet the challenges. In Najib we have an individual full of fluff, blissfully unaware of the fury he has unleashed, and totally incapable of handling the ensuing wreckage. He is, to borrow Nadzri’s less-than-elegant phrase, a “rah rah” leader, reveling in his (Najib’s) own Pollyannaish fantasy.

The Journal rendered a great public service to Malaysians in having these two commentaries freely available on-line. Its initiative also reveals the sad state of Malaysian journalism. I keep hoping that one day our media would learn something from the Journal and treat Malaysians as intelligent adults. I also keep hoping that one day we would have as prime minister someone who would treat us with respect and trust us with the truth. We deserve better than what we are being served now.