Friday, 26 June 2009
Michael Jackson, pop music legend, dead at 50
(CNN) -- Michael Jackson, the show-stopping singer whose best-selling albums -- including "Off the Wall," "Thriller" and "Bad" -- and electrifying stage presence made him one of the most popular artists of all time, died Thursday, CNN has confirmed.
Michael Jackson, shown in 2008, was one of the biggest pop stars in history.
He was 50.
He collapsed at his residence in the Holmby Hills section of Los Angeles, California, about noon Pacific time, suffering cardiac arrest, according to brother Randy Jackson. He died at UCLA Medical Center.
Lt. Fred Corral of the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office said an autopsy would probably be done on the singer Friday, with results expected that afternoon.
"Michael Jackson made culture accept a person of color," the Rev. Al Sharpton said. "To say an 'icon' would only give these young people in Harlem a fraction of what he was. He was a historic figure that people will measure music and the industry by."
Jackson's blazing rise to stardom -- and later fall from grace -- is among the most startling of show business tales. The son of a steelworker, he rose to fame as the lead singer of the Jackson 5, a band he formed with his brothers in the late 1960s. By the late '70s, as a solo artist, he was topping the charts with cuts from "Off the Wall," including "Rock With You" and "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough.
In 1982, he released "Thriller," an album that eventually produced seven hit singles. An appearance the next year on a Motown Records 25th-anniversary special cemented his status as the biggest star in the country.
For the rest of the 1980s, they came no bigger. "Thriller's" follow-up, 1987's "Bad," sold almost as many copies. A new Jackson album -- a new Jackson appearance -- was a pop culture event.
The pop music landscape was changing, however, opening up for rap, hip-hop and what came to be called "alternative" -- and Jackson was seen as out of step.
His next release, 1991's "Dangerous," debuted at No. 1 but "only" produced one top-ranking single -- "Black or White" -- and that song earned criticism for its inexplicably violent ending, in which Jackson was seen smashing car windows and clutching his crotch.
And then "Dangerous" was knocked out of its No. 1 spot on the album charts by Nirvana's "Nevermind," an occurrence noted for its symbolism by rock critics.
After that, more attention was paid to Jackson's private life than his music career, which faltered. A 1995 two-CD greatest hits, "HIStory," sold relatively poorly, given the huge expense of Jackson's recording contract: about 7 million copies, according to Recording Industry of America certifications.
A 2001 album of new material, "Invincible," did even worse.
In 2005, he went to trial on child-molestation charges. He was acquitted.
In July 2008, after three years away from the spotlight, Jackson announced a series of concerts at London's O2 Arena as his "curtain call." Some of the shows, initially scheduled to begin in July, were eventually postponed until 2010. Watch the reaction to Jackson's passing
Rise to stardom
Michael Jackson was born August 29, 1958, to Joe Jackson, a Gary, Indiana, steelworker, and his wife, Katherine. By the time he was 6, he had joined his brothers in a musical group organized by his father, and by the time he was 10, the group -- the Jackson 5 -- had been signed to Motown.
He made his first television appearance at age 11.
Jackson, a natural performer, soon became the group's front man. Music critic Langdon Winner, reviewing the group's first album, "Diana Ross Presents the Jackson 5," for Rolling Stone, praised Michael's versatile singing and added, "Who is this 'Diana Ross,' anyway?"
The group's first four singles -- "I Want You Back," "ABC," "The Love You Save" and "I'll Be There" -- went to No. 1 on the Billboard pop chart, the first time any group had pulled off that feat. There was even a Jackson 5 cartoon series on ABC.
In 1972, he hit No. 1 as a solo artist with the song "Ben."
The group's popularity waned as the '70s continued, and Michael eventually went solo full time. He played the Scarecrow in the 1978 movie version of "The Wiz," and released the album "Off the Wall" in 1979. Its success paved the way for "Thriller," which eventually became the best-selling album in history, with 50 million copies sold worldwide.
At that point, Michael Jackson became ubiquitous.
Seven of "Thriller's" nine cuts were released as singles; all made the Top Ten. The then-new cable channel MTV, criticized for its almost exclusively white playlist, finally started playing Jackson's videos. They aired incessantly, including a 14-minute minimovie of the title cut. ("Weird Al" Yankovic cemented his own stardom by lampooning Jackson's song "Beat It" with a letter-perfect parody video.)
On the Motown Records' 25th-anniversary special -- a May 1983 TV extravaganza with notable turns by the Temptations, the Four Tops and Smokey Robinson -- it was Michael Jackson who stopped the show.
Already he was the most popular musician in America, riding high with "Thriller." But something about his electrifying performance of "Billie Jean," complete with the patented backward dance moves, boosted his stardom to a new level.
People copied his Jheri-curled hair and single-gloved, zippered-jacket look. Showbiz veterans such as Fred Astaire praised his chops. He posed for photos with Ronald and Nancy Reagan at the White House. Paul McCartney teamed with him on three duets, two of which -- "The Girl Is Mine" and "Say Say Say" -- became top five hits. Jackson became a Pepsi spokesman, and when his hair caught fire while making a commercial, it was worldwide news.
It all happened very fast -- within a couple years of the Motown special. But even at the time of the "Motown 25" moonwalk, fame was old hat to Michael Jackson. He hadn't even turned 25 himself, but he'd been a star for more than half his life. He was given the nickname the "King of Pop" -- a spin on Elvis Presley's status as "the King of Rock 'n' Roll" -- and few questioned the moniker.
Relentless attention
But, as the showbiz saying has it, when you're on top of the world, there's nowhere to go but down. The relentless attention given Jackson started focusing as much on his eccentricities -- some real, some rumored -- as his music.
As the Web site Allmusic.com notes, he was rumored to sleep in a hyperbaric chamber and to have purchased the bones of John Merrick, the "Elephant Man." (Neither was true.) He did have a pet chimpanzee, Bubbles; underwent a series of increasingly drastic plastic surgeries; established an estate, Neverland, filled with zoo animals and amusement park rides; and managed to purchase the Beatles catalog from under Paul McCartney's nose, which displeased the ex-Beatle immensely.
In 1990s and 2000s, Jackson found himself pasted across the media for his short-lived marriages, the first to Elvis Presley's daughter, Lisa Marie; his 2002 claim that then Sony Records head Tommy Mottola was racist; his behavior and statements during a 2003 interview with British journalist Martin Bashir done for a documentary called "Living With Michael Jackson;" his changing physical appearance; and, above all, the accusations that he sexually molested young boys at Neverland.
The first such accusation, in 1993, resulted in a settlement to the 13-year-old accuser (rumored to be as high as $20 million), though no criminal charges were filed, Allmusic.com notes.
He also fell deeply in debt and was forced to sell some of his assets. Neverland was one of many holdings that went on the block. However, an auction of material from Neverland, scheduled for April, was called off and all items returned to Jackson.
Interest in Jackson never faded, however, even if some of it was prurient. In 2008, when he announced 10 comeback shows in London, beginning in July 2009, the story made worldwide news. The number of concerts was later increased to 50.
Seventy-five thousand tickets sold in four hours when they went on sale in March.
However, when the shows were postponed until 2010, rumors swept the Internet that Jackson was not physically prepared and possibly suffering from skin cancer.
At the time, the president and CEO of AEG Live, Randy Phillips, said, "He's as healthy as can be -- no health problems whatsover."
Jackson held open auditions for dancers in April in Los Angeles.
He is survived by his three children, Prince Michael I, Paris and Prince Michael II.DAP assemblyman sues Hee over pepper spray attack
By Shannon Teoh - The Malaysian Insider
IPOH, June 26 – DAP assemblyman Yew Tian Hoe has filed a suit against Perak assembly deputy speaker Hee Yit Foong for allegedly assaulting him with a pepper spray during the chaotic May 7 sitting state.
This adds to the mountain of legal battles over the Perak constitutional crisis which has already seen multiple suits being filed by mentri besars, speakers, assemblymen and even voters to gain legitimate control of the state government.
Arriving at the High Court here at about 11am this morning with Perak DAP secretary Nga Kor Ming and several other Pakatan Rakyat (PR) assemblymen, Yew claimed that he had video evidence of the incident.
“I already spotted her holding it before the sitting began which was why I was careful and later, avoided the full force of the spray,” he told reporters.
Nga added that the Aulong assemblyman had given Hee more than a month to apologise for the attack but since she has instead “twisted the facts and lied to the public,” Yew had no choice but to file a suit as part of his duty to defend the honour of the assembly.
“The suit sends a signal on the importance of the sanctity of the house,” he said, adding that for this act, Hee should resign as deputy speaker.
Hee has denied the allegations, claiming the pepper spray canister had been thrown at her and she had just picked it up from the floor and asked Yew whether the item belonged to him.
In the aftermath of the May 7 sitting where Barisan Nasional’s (BN) Datuk R. Ganesan had replaced V. Sivakumar as speaker, she had first claimed that she had pointed her hotel key-chain and not a pepper spray canister at Yee. Other reports quoted her as saying it was a pendrive.
But after pictures of her clearly holding up a pepper spray canister surfaced, she admitted that she held the spray but never used it, arguing that if she had, Yew would have been blinded for several days but instead ended the day unharmed.
She has become deeply unpopular especially with ethnic Chinese in Perak for what they see as an act of betrayal when she left DAP and declared her support for BN, a move which helped to trigger the Feb 5 takeover of the state government and subsequently, the current constitutional crisis.
Nizar to finally get written grounds from Court of Appeal today
By Debra Chong - The Malaysian Insider
KUALA LUMPUR, June 26 — The Court of Appeal in Putrajaya will finally be releasing their grounds of judgment in the highly disputed legal battle over who is the real mentri besar (MB) of Perak at 3pm today.
The release comes exactly a week after toppled Pakatan Rakyat (PR) mentri besar Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin filed an appeal to the Federal Court, the highest court in the country.
Nizar wants the top court to reverse the Court of Appeal's decision declaring his political rival from the Barisan Nasional (BN) camp Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir the lawful MB.
Lawyers for Nizar told The Malaysian Insider they are expecting to get three separate written judgments today – one from each of the three judges who sat on the panel to hear the Perak MB vs MB case.
The Court of Appeal on May 22 overturned a High Court ruling on May 11 declaring Nizar to be the rightful mentri besar of Perak.
The three-man panel of judges , made up of Justices Datuk Md Raus Sharif, Datuk Zainun Ali and Datuk Ahmad Maarop, had promised to provide the grounds for dismissing his appeal within a week of their oral verdict – but failed to do so.
The much-talked about written judgments, while not a must for Nizar’s case to be forwarded to the Federal Court, will provide the key reasons for dismissing Nizar's appeal against Zambry.
JJ: Umno not fighting for Malays alone
By Lee Wei Lian - The Malaysian Insider
KUALA LUMPUR, June 26 – While all this talk about unity government seems to point to Umno focusing on winning back Malay support at the expense of alienating the non-Malays, the deputy chief of the committee tasked with renewing and rejuvenating the party says “we are not fighting for the cause of the Malays alone.”
Datuk Seri Jamaluddin Jarjis says, “We want to win Malaysian support. We are not fighting for the cause of the Malays alone. We are fighting for the Malaysian cause. All communities must feel taken care of.
“Even in 1957, we felt that we could not be independent without bringing along our Chinese and Indian brothers. So we gave citizenship. Umno has sacrificed before.
“1 Malaysia is an affirmation that we are fighting for all. If there is a perception that Umno is fighting only for the Malays, we have to remove that.”
The supreme council member adds that Umno will need a different approach in order to maintain its “market leadership” in the next 50 years as the conditions in the country have changed since independence.
“The demographics have changed, education levels have gone up, the people are more urbanised and there is more technology which created the new media. We have to change otherwise we won’t be able to keep our leadership position.
“Umno was pivotal in gaining independence, we have to keep the good recipe of working with other races. But we need new strategies to deal with the terrain which has changed.”
Jamaluddin, however, declined to discuss strategies in detail.
One senior Umno leader says that Umno is exploring the possibility for a needs-based rather than ethnic-based economic policies as it will widen the scope for assistance to all races without causing poor Malays to lose out.
“Umno is looking into having universal values for economic redressal for poverty and low income,” he said.
Non-Malays who have often felt sidelined by Umno will welcome such proposals but similar sentiments have been expressed in the past and eventually came to nothing.
The question for Umno now is, will the wake-up call it received in the last election be enough for it to finally change with the times?
Najib should present ministerial statement in Parliament on Monday on various current Petronas issues
By Lim Kit Siang,
The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak should present a ministerial statement in Parliament on Monday on various current Petronas issues – a new CEO, his insistence to appoint defaulter Omar Mustapha as Petronas director, declining Petronas profits and most important of all, a new regime of Petronas accountability to Parliament.
The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak should present a ministerial statement in Parliament on Monday on various current Petronas issues – a new CEO, his insistence to appoint defaulter Omar Mustapha as Petronas director, declining Petronas profits and most important of all, a new regime of Petronas accountability to Parliament.
Recently, what is making waves in Petronas and well-informed local circles and reported internationally, though completely swept under the carpet by the local mainstream media, is the repeated attempts by the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak to force the appointment of his aide, Omar Mustapha as director of Petronas.
The Singapore Straits Times has reported that the Petronas Board of Directors has rebuffed Najib’s attempt to foist the appointment of Omar for the second time this Wednesday, as the Board was directed by Najib to reconsider its decision last month rejecting Omar’s appointment.
The reason for the Petronas Board’s rejection of Omar as director is that Omar had defaulted on his scholarship loan agreement with Petronas two decades earlier. Omar did not complete the required number of years of service with the national oil corporation or a related government agency as stipulated in his scholarship agreement. Petronas also initiated legal proceedings against Omar in 2001.
Najib should explain to Parliament why he is insisting on appointing a Petronas loan defaulter as a director of Petronas, as the widespread objections to Omar’s appointment to the Petronas, now taking up by the Board, is fully justified and valid.
Furthermore, why as a former Petronas officer, Najib is so reckless about the adverse effect on the morale of serving and dedicated Petronas officers that would result from the appointment of a Petronas defaulter to the Petronas Board!
Parliament should also be informed whether the Prime Minister is looking for a new Petronas CEO to replace Tan Sri Hassan Merican.
Earlier, the name of former Home Minister, Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar had been bruited as the likely new Petronas CEO. In the last few days, another name has emerged: Datuk Mohd Bakke Salleh, the Felda Holdings group managing director, and that he is to understudy Hassan until the present Petronas CEO’s retirement next February.
Although the final decision of the new Petronas CEO rests with the Prime Minister, MPs from both sides of the divide should be given the opportunity to give their views on the possible candidates.
Parliamentarians, whether Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat, must also be given regular updates of Malaysia’s only company on Fortune 500, especially as Petronas has just reported a net profit decline by 13.9 per cent due to low oil prices and high production costs.
The group reported RM52.5 billion in net profit compared with RM61 billion the previous year although its revenue increased by 18.4 per cent to RM264.2 billion compared with RM223.1 billion the previous year.
Petronas plays a critical and strategic role in the public finances of the country, as Petronas paid out to the government RM74 billion in the financial year ending March 31, 2009 compared with RM61.6 billion the previous year, an increase of 20.1 per cent.
The payment represented 71.4 per cent of the group’s profit before tax, royalty and export duty of RM103.7 billion. Of the payment, RM30 billion was in the form of dividends and the rest in taxes, royalty and export duty.
Petronas contributions amounted to RM72.5 billion or 45 per cent of federal government revenue in the 2008 calendar year.
This is a very high figure reflecting the government’s heavy dependence on oil revenue, a situation which may not be sustainable or ideal for a country trying to develop an economy based on knowledge and innovation.
Petronas represents the biggest chink in the government’s armour in its claim of accountability, transparency and good governance as the national oil corporation as presently constituted is totally not accountable to Parliament!
There is no annual Petronas report to Parliament. The Public Accounts Committee has not even dared to call up the Petronas CEO and President to give a proper accounting of his stewardship of Petronas.
If Najib is sincere in his motto of “1Malaysia, People First. Performance Now”, he should present to Parliament on Monday his proposal for a new regime of Petronas accountability to Parliament.so that there is meaningful monitoring and accounting of the petro-ringgit in Parliament.
Yusri to resign as Abim president
LANGKAWI, 26 June 2009: Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement (Abim) president Yusri Mohamad said today he would relinquish the post at the movement's 38th assembly in Shah Alam on 1 Aug.
Yusri, who has held the post for two terms, said although he is not yet 40, he wanted to give the new line-up a chance to lead Abim.
Speaking after closing a haj course at Masjid Al Hana' Kuah Langkawi here, he said this year's assembly would raise the motion on ways to tackle the sociopolitical upheaval among Malaysian Muslims.
He also said that Abim, which now has 50,000 members, was stepping up its membership drive.Woman goes to Parliament over hubby’s lock-up death
The Star
She was speaking to the press after handing over a memorandum to Deputy Home Minister Jelaing Mersat, accompanied by Bukit Lanjan assemblyman Elizabeth Wong and Subang MP R. Sivarasa.
Manimalai, 40, claimed that when she last visited her husband at the Damansara Damai police station, his right eye was bruised.
“He told me the police had beaten him up. He said he had complained to the magistrate about the beating but no action was taken,” she said.
A post-mortem by Universiti Malaya Medical Centre pathologist Dr Prashant Samberkar found that Gnanaprasagam died of “toxaemia secondary to spontaneous peritonitis” – poison in the blood from bacterial infection in the intestines.
Sivarasa said that although Manimalai would not dispute the findings of the post-mortem, she wanted to know why her husband had not been given care while in detention.
He said that under the Criminal Procedure Code, an inquest should be held immediately after a detainee’s death.
“However, in Malaysia, the inquest is usually held months or even years after the death. We want an inquest to be held immediately,” he said, adding that the probe into Gnanaprasagam’s death should be carried out by an independent body and not by the police.
KUALA LUMPUR: A mother of seven, M. Manimalai, wants an inquest into the death of her husband A. Gnanapragasam, who was found dead in a police lock-up earlier this month.
She said Gnanaprasagam, 53, a wireman, who was arrested on June 10 for allegedly breaking into a house in Sg Buloh, had never complained of illness to her or felt ill when he was alive.
“A few days after he was detained by the police, he was dead. Who is going to take care of us now?” she asked at the Parliament lobby here yesterday.
She said Gnanaprasagam, 53, a wireman, who was arrested on June 10 for allegedly breaking into a house in Sg Buloh, had never complained of illness to her or felt ill when he was alive.
“A few days after he was detained by the police, he was dead. Who is going to take care of us now?” she asked at the Parliament lobby here yesterday.
She was speaking to the press after handing over a memorandum to Deputy Home Minister Jelaing Mersat, accompanied by Bukit Lanjan assemblyman Elizabeth Wong and Subang MP R. Sivarasa.
Manimalai, 40, claimed that when she last visited her husband at the Damansara Damai police station, his right eye was bruised.
“He told me the police had beaten him up. He said he had complained to the magistrate about the beating but no action was taken,” she said.
A post-mortem by Universiti Malaya Medical Centre pathologist Dr Prashant Samberkar found that Gnanaprasagam died of “toxaemia secondary to spontaneous peritonitis” – poison in the blood from bacterial infection in the intestines.
Sivarasa said that although Manimalai would not dispute the findings of the post-mortem, she wanted to know why her husband had not been given care while in detention.
He said that under the Criminal Procedure Code, an inquest should be held immediately after a detainee’s death.
“However, in Malaysia, the inquest is usually held months or even years after the death. We want an inquest to be held immediately,” he said, adding that the probe into Gnanaprasagam’s death should be carried out by an independent body and not by the police.
THE JOHORE CAUSEWAY / TAMBAK JOHOR
1. I put the document on the financing of the construction of the Johor Causeway because a Minister in Tun Abdullah's Government claimed that it is jointly owned by us and Singapore. Therefore Singapore must agree before anything (demolition) is done to the causeway.
2. There has never been any agreement or treaty to say that the causeway is jointly owned. If at all 2/3rd of the causeway belong to Johore. And the 2/3rd must be the part which ends in Johore Bahru because the border on the Tebrau Straits is the deep water line which runs midway between Singapore and Johore. This must also be the border on the causeway. The northern half of the causeway therefore belong to Malaysia, a sovereign independent nation.
3. The suggestion that we may not touch the causeway without Singapore's permission is not part of any agreement with Singapore. What we do to the part of the causeway which is ours is our sovereign right. Not to exercise our sovereign right is akin to not being independent.
4. Why should we build a bridge to replace the causeway? That part of Johore Bahru where the traffic to and from the causeway meets the traffic going east and west in JB is often jammed. In future as more vehicles go on the roads the jam would certainly get worse.
5. The bridge will join the elevated road to and from the CIQ (Customs, Immigration and Quarantine complex) leaving the traffic east and west to flow freely.
6. Besides the traffic problem, the water in the straits is stagnant. If the causeway is opened up there would be constant flow of water in both direction, thus flushing out the water in the strait.
7. Without the causeway boats and yachts can sail in either direction. Transport of goods and people between Pasir Gudang Port to Tanjung Pelepas Port would be facilitated. This would be good for the growth of both ports - something which perhaps Singapore would not like to see.
8. The free movements of boats along the strait would itself create business. The bridge which would be wider than the causeway would speed up the flow of traffic. The CIQ was designed to handle this increasingly heavier traffic.
9. As to why it was not built during my 22 years, the answer is that the need for a bridge became clear towards the end of my term. In any case I had approved it before I stepped down. The work was started during my time. Had Abdullah not stopped it, the bridge would have been almost complete by now.
10. Since Singapore would only agree to a straight bridge if one billion cubic metre of sand is sold to it; since the people of Johore are against selling sand and allowing Singapore fighter planes to practice over Johore, the option for the Malaysian Government is to revert to building the scenic bridge in our territorial waters. This is the sovereign right of an independent nation.
11. Instead Tun Abdullah decided not only not to build the bridge but to stop negotiating over all the other issues including the refusal of Singapore to release CPF (Central Provident Fund) contribution of Peninsular Malaysians, the railway land, the 3 sen per 1,000 gallons which Singapore pays for raw water (Malacca pays 30 sen per 1,000 gallons).
12. All these issues are in Singapore's favour and not negotiating better terms because Johore people refuse to sell sand is like cutting one's nose to spite one's face. We are the losers. I think it is a very stupid way of punishing Singapore. Or is it the intention to punish Johore people for not agreeing to sell sand (somebody is bound to make a huge amount of money) and rejecting the honour of having Singapore warplanes practicing aerial combat and bombing over Johore.
5. The bridge will join the elevated road to and from the CIQ (Customs, Immigration and Quarantine complex) leaving the traffic east and west to flow freely.
6. Besides the traffic problem, the water in the straits is stagnant. If the causeway is opened up there would be constant flow of water in both direction, thus flushing out the water in the strait.
7. Without the causeway boats and yachts can sail in either direction. Transport of goods and people between Pasir Gudang Port to Tanjung Pelepas Port would be facilitated. This would be good for the growth of both ports - something which perhaps Singapore would not like to see.
8. The free movements of boats along the strait would itself create business. The bridge which would be wider than the causeway would speed up the flow of traffic. The CIQ was designed to handle this increasingly heavier traffic.
9. As to why it was not built during my 22 years, the answer is that the need for a bridge became clear towards the end of my term. In any case I had approved it before I stepped down. The work was started during my time. Had Abdullah not stopped it, the bridge would have been almost complete by now.
10. Since Singapore would only agree to a straight bridge if one billion cubic metre of sand is sold to it; since the people of Johore are against selling sand and allowing Singapore fighter planes to practice over Johore, the option for the Malaysian Government is to revert to building the scenic bridge in our territorial waters. This is the sovereign right of an independent nation.
11. Instead Tun Abdullah decided not only not to build the bridge but to stop negotiating over all the other issues including the refusal of Singapore to release CPF (Central Provident Fund) contribution of Peninsular Malaysians, the railway land, the 3 sen per 1,000 gallons which Singapore pays for raw water (Malacca pays 30 sen per 1,000 gallons).
12. All these issues are in Singapore's favour and not negotiating better terms because Johore people refuse to sell sand is like cutting one's nose to spite one's face. We are the losers. I think it is a very stupid way of punishing Singapore. Or is it the intention to punish Johore people for not agreeing to sell sand (somebody is bound to make a huge amount of money) and rejecting the honour of having Singapore warplanes practicing aerial combat and bombing over Johore.
Kg Buah Pala: Hopes ride high on Guan Eng & Pakatan Government - Got Peduli Rakyat?
by Nathaniel Tan
I unfortunately haven’t followed the Kampung Buah Pala case as closely as I would have liked, but from the little I’ve read, I am inclined to join in the hopes of those that YAB Lim Guan Eng will exercise compassion and save the villagers from eviction and demolition.
It’s really an opportunity for Pakatan to show that they are people oriented, and not money oriented. What’s worse, this land deal seems to be Umno linked!
On Wednesday, a three-man bench Federal Court delivered a devastating blow to the villagers when it dismissed their appeal to save their village from demolition.
Now they have pinned all hopes on the wisdom and caring policy of their Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng.
Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) leader P Uthayakumar said recently that the villagers’ plight can end with a mere stroke of Lim’s pen.
The villagers are praying for that to happen to safeguard their village that the current residents and ancestors have lived for nearly two centuries.
They want Lim to exercise his chief ministerial power under Section 76 of the National Land Code to save their village from scavenging developers.
The state land office registrar is empowered to caveat the land on legal grounds.
The state government has already begun investigation on the Kampung Buah Pala land deal under the land scam.
“This will prevent the developer from demolishing the houses and flattening the village. Lim then could acquire the land on grounds of public interests.
“The residents then can buy the land from the state government. We hope Lim’s government can do it for us,” said the Kampung Buah Pala Residents Association assistant secretary C Tharmaraj.
The country’s highest apex court upheld the appellate court’s ruling that the villagers have no legal standing to question the transfer of the land from a housing trust to the state government.
The land was subsequently sold for RM3.21 million to the Koperasi Pegawai Kanan Kerajaan Pulau Pinang and this led to a lucrative development project undertaken by Umno-linked Nusmetro Ventures (P) Sdn Bhd.
According to the villagers, the sale price - estimated at RM11.33 per sq ft - was far below market value.
The developers have argued that these residents, despite living in the village for centuries, have no grounds to sue, and therefore they were deemed squatters.
Justices Augustine Paul, Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusoff and Hashim Yusoff however ruled in favour of the developers.
Armed with this, the developers could come in any time to demolish the village.
The villagers are already on a round-the-clock high alert guard to stop any demolition work.
Kampung Buah Pala is known among locals as ‘Tamil High Chaparral’ because of its population of cowherds, cattles, goats and Tamil traditional cultural features.
ps- why am I not surprised Augustine Paul ruled in this manner :P
Nik Aziz Should Not Confuse The People, Says Ku Li
KUALA KRAI, June 26 (Bernama) -- PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat should not make statements that can confuse the people especially when he likened the Umno cause to the teachings of Ayah Pin, communistic and describing the party as propagating the socialist ideology that rejects religion and belief in God.
Gua Musang Member of Parliament Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah said the statement by Nik Aziz at a ceramah in Laloh, Manek Urai, on June 21, which was alleged to be seditious, was inappropriate as the Kelantan Menteri Besar had previously contested in the general election in Kelantan on a Barisan Nasional (BN) ticket.
"PAS is also a political party like Umno. We (Umno) are also fighting for Islam. Everything that we do is for the sake of Islam. It should not be questioned. Such talks are illogical.
"He was previously with the BN too. In 1967, he contested in a by-election in Kelantan together with the BN. In 1974 when Kelantan was under the BN government, he contested in Bachok on a BN ticket. Why raise an issue that can confuse the people's thinking," he said.
Tengku Razaleigh said this to reporters after a meeting with the people of Manik Urai at Sekolah Kebangsaan Manik Urai, here, today. Also present were Kelantan BN secretary Datuk Alwi Che Ahmad and Kuala Krai Umno division head Datuk Ramzi Abdul Rahman.
On the by-election for the Manik Urai state seat on July 14, the Gua Musang Member of Parliament said the BN had a good chance of victory as PAS had lost the seat before.
Gua Musang Member of Parliament Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah said the statement by Nik Aziz at a ceramah in Laloh, Manek Urai, on June 21, which was alleged to be seditious, was inappropriate as the Kelantan Menteri Besar had previously contested in the general election in Kelantan on a Barisan Nasional (BN) ticket.
"PAS is also a political party like Umno. We (Umno) are also fighting for Islam. Everything that we do is for the sake of Islam. It should not be questioned. Such talks are illogical.
"He was previously with the BN too. In 1967, he contested in a by-election in Kelantan together with the BN. In 1974 when Kelantan was under the BN government, he contested in Bachok on a BN ticket. Why raise an issue that can confuse the people's thinking," he said.
Tengku Razaleigh said this to reporters after a meeting with the people of Manik Urai at Sekolah Kebangsaan Manik Urai, here, today. Also present were Kelantan BN secretary Datuk Alwi Che Ahmad and Kuala Krai Umno division head Datuk Ramzi Abdul Rahman.
On the by-election for the Manik Urai state seat on July 14, the Gua Musang Member of Parliament said the BN had a good chance of victory as PAS had lost the seat before.
RM100 juta ditambah untuk dana politik Umno ?
Semasa perbahasan usul Menteri Kewangan bagi pengemaskinian dan pemindahan dana kerajaan lanjutan daripada penyerapan agensi-agensi Kerajaan yang dahulunya di bawah Kementerian Pembangunan Usahawan dan Koperasi,ramai ahli parlimen khususnya ahli - ahli Parlimen Umno telah bangun dengan meminta dana Tabung Ekonomi Kumpulan Usaha Niaga (TEKUN) supaya ditambah.
Akhirnya semalam Timbalan Menteri Kewangan, YB Senator Dato' Dr Awang Adek Hussein, dalam ucapan penggulungannya telah mengumumkan bahawa kerajaan akan menaikkan dana Tekun sebanyak RM100 juta pada tahun ini.
Secara kasarnya ia satu keputusan yang baik penambahan dana bantuan untuk membantu usahawan.
Persoalanya benarkan dana tambahan RM100 juta ini benar tersalur kepada usahawan yang sewajarnya ?
TEKUN ialah satu projek penyaluran dana kerajaan membantu usahawan kecil dalam bentuk mikro kredit. Antara pencetus idea ini ialah Dr. Mansor Othman (kini Timbalan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang). Diwujudkan dengan niat begitu murni. Namun malangnya pelaksanaanya menghancurkan niat murni penubuhannya.
Kebanyakan Pejabat TEKUN ditempatkan pasti berhampiran pejabat Umno, mungkin ini memudahkan unsur Umno mengawal agihan dana tersebut. Malah bukan menjadi satu rahsia untuk membolehkan mendapat pinjaman TEKUN pemimpin perlu menyertakan bukti menjadi ahli Umno.
Khairy Jamaluddin (menantu bekas Perdana Menteri) baru - baru ini kononya mengeluh mengenai betapa TEKUN kekurangan dana dan antara penyebabnya ialah peminjam yang tidak membayar semula.
Ketika merasmikan Pusat Aduan Komuniti Pergerakan Pemuda UMNO menantu Abdullah Badawi ini berkata akan mencadangkan agar nama peminjam TEKUN yang tidak bertanggungjawab ini perlu didedahkan.
Jawapanya mudah sahaja wahai menantu Abdullah, dedahkanlah nescaya kamu akan menjumpai senarai ahli Umno yang tidak tahu berniaga yang 'dianugerahkan' dengan pinjaman wang atas nama TEKUN.
Pengumuman tambahan RM100 juta semalam dilihat umpama seperti membuang air dari tempayan ke tanah. RM100 juta akan digunakan untuk tujuan survival politik Umno...entah berapa titik sahaja akan dapat kepada mereka yang benar memerlukan.
Terbaru juga dapat aduan dari seorang kontraktor di Rembau menyatakan cara agihan projek pembangunan dibawah peruntukan parlimen. Tiap anggota parlimen diperuntukan RM1 juta untuk projek pembagunan parlimen. Di Rembau dikhabarkan kontraktor Umno secara bebas boleh mencadangkan projek dan menghantar cadangan kepada ahli Parlimen Rembau. Tidak ada tender. Jika cadangan projek tersebut lulus yang pasti dari jumlah pembayaran projek tersebut perlu diagihkan dengan memulangkan sebahagianya dari nilai tuntutan untuk Umno semula.
Akhirnya semalam Timbalan Menteri Kewangan, YB Senator Dato' Dr Awang Adek Hussein, dalam ucapan penggulungannya telah mengumumkan bahawa kerajaan akan menaikkan dana Tekun sebanyak RM100 juta pada tahun ini.
Secara kasarnya ia satu keputusan yang baik penambahan dana bantuan untuk membantu usahawan.
Persoalanya benarkan dana tambahan RM100 juta ini benar tersalur kepada usahawan yang sewajarnya ?
TEKUN ialah satu projek penyaluran dana kerajaan membantu usahawan kecil dalam bentuk mikro kredit. Antara pencetus idea ini ialah Dr. Mansor Othman (kini Timbalan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang). Diwujudkan dengan niat begitu murni. Namun malangnya pelaksanaanya menghancurkan niat murni penubuhannya.
Kebanyakan Pejabat TEKUN ditempatkan pasti berhampiran pejabat Umno, mungkin ini memudahkan unsur Umno mengawal agihan dana tersebut. Malah bukan menjadi satu rahsia untuk membolehkan mendapat pinjaman TEKUN pemimpin perlu menyertakan bukti menjadi ahli Umno.
Khairy Jamaluddin (menantu bekas Perdana Menteri) baru - baru ini kononya mengeluh mengenai betapa TEKUN kekurangan dana dan antara penyebabnya ialah peminjam yang tidak membayar semula.
Ketika merasmikan Pusat Aduan Komuniti Pergerakan Pemuda UMNO menantu Abdullah Badawi ini berkata akan mencadangkan agar nama peminjam TEKUN yang tidak bertanggungjawab ini perlu didedahkan.
Jawapanya mudah sahaja wahai menantu Abdullah, dedahkanlah nescaya kamu akan menjumpai senarai ahli Umno yang tidak tahu berniaga yang 'dianugerahkan' dengan pinjaman wang atas nama TEKUN.
Pengumuman tambahan RM100 juta semalam dilihat umpama seperti membuang air dari tempayan ke tanah. RM100 juta akan digunakan untuk tujuan survival politik Umno...entah berapa titik sahaja akan dapat kepada mereka yang benar memerlukan.
Terbaru juga dapat aduan dari seorang kontraktor di Rembau menyatakan cara agihan projek pembangunan dibawah peruntukan parlimen. Tiap anggota parlimen diperuntukan RM1 juta untuk projek pembagunan parlimen. Di Rembau dikhabarkan kontraktor Umno secara bebas boleh mencadangkan projek dan menghantar cadangan kepada ahli Parlimen Rembau. Tidak ada tender. Jika cadangan projek tersebut lulus yang pasti dari jumlah pembayaran projek tersebut perlu diagihkan dengan memulangkan sebahagianya dari nilai tuntutan untuk Umno semula.
How race and religion are part of the Malaysian political scene
How can we talk about politics without touching on the matter of race and religion when everything about Malaysian politics involves race and religion? In fact, not only when it comes to politics, almost everything in Malaysia is about race and religion.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Police report against Nik Aziz for 'inciting hatred'
The Star, 25 June 2009
The Kelantan Umno Youth has lodged a police report against Kelantan Mentri Besar Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat for allegedly inciting hatred, anger and possibly causing chaos among the people of Kelantan.
State Youth chief Anuar Safian, who lodged the police report at the Kota Baru police station at 10.30am Thursday added that the police report was lodged to enable the authorities to investigate Nik Abdul Aziz’s speech made on June 21 at Kampung Laloh, Manek Urai at a gathering.
He said Nik Abdul Aziz, who is also PAS spiritual leader, should be investigated under the Sedition Act 1948 and the Internal Security Act 1960 for allegedly inciting chaos and eliciting racial disputes and understanding.
He added that his speech was beyond the scope of a regular ceramah when he attacked Umno by likening the party similar to that of Ayah Pin and the Sky Kingdom and branded Umno as a communist and a socialist party that was anti-Islam.
In his report, he said the spiritual leader’s speech was reported in an English daily and Kelantan TV and many other publications that commented on Nik Abdul Aziz’s speech.
“I want to ask Nik Abdul Aziz how many people had Umno deviated since its involvement in politics for the past 64 years and if we were communists and did not believe in God, just look at what Umno had done for Islam and the Malays all these years.
“His attacks is beyond comprehension and it should be investigated as people might believe his words and in the end people would hate Umno that would lead to untoward incidents,” he told reporters infront of the Kota Baru police station after lodging the police report.
*************************************************
Peguam perempuan Melayu kena main dengan Keling2 di Bar Council
Lima peguam Melayu yang terdiri dari perempuan Melayu telah ditahan oleh polis kerena konon mahu mempertahankan perkumpulan yang untuk menentang kerajaan Melayu UMNO.
Semanngat kekelingan yang ditunjukan oleh peguam perempuan Melayu ini dalam memperjuang kumpulan haram yang anti Sultan Perak sangat menghairankan.
Mereka memperjuangkan Wong Chin Huat yang menghina Sulan Perak kerana menjalan tugasnya melantik UMNO sebagai kerajaan majoriti di Perak.
Kelima perempuan Melayu ini telah diperalat oleh Keling Bar council untuk menjadi heroin terhadap polis Malaysia dan Kerajaan UMNO. Yang masuk jail mereka bukan Ragunath. Kenapa jadi baruah Ragunath dan Wong Chin Huat?
Keling2 di Bar Council ini menyorok dibelakang perempuan Melayu ini dan ramai peguam Melayu yang tak sedar diri mereka dipermainkan oleh Keling2 di Bar Council.
Keadilan adalah budaya Melayu amnya dan tidak perlu Keling2 di Bar Council mengajar polis atau IGP dan Kerajaan Melayu.
Jika adapun tindakan polis di raja Malaysia adalah untuk mempertahankan kedaulatan raja2 Melayu. Kenapa mesti perempuan peguam Melayu ini menentang raja2 Melayu dan menjadi heroin kepada mereka yang mahu mencerca Sultan Perak?
Kenapakah peguam keling satu dan Cina langsung tak ada tidak terlibat dalam 5 peguam ini?
The lawyers , Fadiah Nadwa Fikri, Ravinder Singh Dhalliwal, Syuhaini Safwan, Murni Hidayah and Puspawati Rosman mengikut NST mahu memperjuangkan mereka yang menentang Sultan Perak. Walaupun mereka tidak kenal siapa yang mahu mereka perjuangkan mereka sanggup jadi pak turut Keling Bar Council dan mengaku peguam mereka.
Ramai peguam perempuan Melayu dan peguam lelaki di STAR yang mempromosikan agenda keling di Bar Council dan menidakkan hak orang Melayu sebagai tuanpunya Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Mereka benci kepada hipokrasi PAS tapi lupa kemajuan Melayu adalah kerana dasar liberal UMNO dan kesultanan Melayu bukan PAS.
wallahuallam bisawab
Penulis adalah ahli pejuang hak dan kerajaan Melayu sedunia
*************************************************
The first item above is The Star news report about a police report made against the Kelantan Menteri Besar, Nik Aziz. The second is an e-mail a Malay lawyer friend sent to me. Understandably, my friend was most upset about the matter and he requested me to address the issue.
Now, read this against the backdrop of the statement by the Prime Minister, Najib Tun Razak, that it is un-Islamic for PAS to reject the Umno call to sit down to discuss ‘Malay unity’ and what do you see?
I know. Many can’t see things in its proper perspective unless it is laid out like a story in a kindergarten book. Even then, after I write a long-winded cheong hei article, readers still miss the point and make comments totally unrelated to the issue.
Some readers have asked me to stop writing about Islam. Others condemn the racist tendencies of many Malaysians. Yet others feel that religion should be kept out of politics and that political parties should not be race-based. Some even call for the banning of race-based political parties.
Just to digress a bit, whenever I am asked about my solution on how to end racism in Malaysia, I respond by saying that we should ban and make illegal same-race marriages. Malays should not be allowed to marry Malays, Chinese marry Chinese, and so on. You are only allowed mixed-race or inter-race marriages.
This can never happen of course and I am only joking. Probably 99% of Malaysians would marry someone from their own race. Does this mean 99% of Malaysians are racists? I would not go so far as to put it that way but maybe we could safely classify them as ‘soft’ racists -- as opposed to ‘hard’ racists like the Ketuanan Melayu gang.
How can we talk about politics without touching on the matter of race and religion when everything about Malaysian politics involves race and religion? In fact, not only when it comes to politics, almost everything in Malaysia is about race and religion.
Yes, we seek social and economic reforms. But none of this will happen until there is a political will to introduce these reforms. So we also need political reforms. But when politics is centred on race and religion then we need reforms in these areas as well. So there is no way you can avoid talking about race and religion before we can see political reforms, which in turn will bring about the social and economic reforms that we clamour for.
Can you now see the vicious cycle? And can you also now see why I hammer the race and religion issues like there is no tomorrow? Race, religion, politics and economics come as a package. One can’t change without the other also changing. To attack one you have to attack all. Only then will we be able to see total reforms in Malaysia.
Indonesian stops sending maids to Malaysia
KUALA LUMPUR, June 25 – Indonesia has ordered its employment agencies to stop sending maids to work in Malaysia because of a flood of complaints that they are being abused by employers here.
Indonesian Manpower Minister Erman Suparno said in Jakarata today that the ban would take effect tomorrow and would remain in place until adequate safeguards are introduced by Malaysian authorities.
The ban is the latest spat in a spate of tiffs between the two countries in recent weeks.
Earlier this month, Indonesian lawmakers accused the Malaysian navy of encroaching on its waters near the Ambalat oil and gas block in the Celebes Sea, an area over which sovereignty is being disputed by both countries.
Suparno said delegations from the two countries are scheduled to hold talks on July 15 to discuss various problems facing Indonesian migrant workers in Malaysia.
At the meeting, the Indonesian delegation will propose reviewing several clauses in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on cooperation in the manpower field both sides signed early this year.
The clauses are among others related to protection of Indonesian migrant workers and their rights as well as improvement of their salaries.
More than 300,000 Indonesian women work as maids in Malaysia, with up to 3,000 new maids heading here every month from the republic.
But there have been an increasing number of complaints that maids are being abused.
Indonesian authorities say maids file up to 150 complaints every month over a variety of abuses from ill treatment to being overworked and also for unpaid salaries.
In some cases, Indonesian maids have alleged physical abuse.
In the most recent case highlighted by local media, an Indonesian maid claimed she had been scalded and beaten by her employer.
“'We want to protect our workers from violations of contracts and physical abuse,” Suparno told reporters in Jakarta today.
The decision to ban Indonesian maids comes even as Malaysia announced new legislation that would allow maids a mandatory day off every week.
But Malaysian officials have also said that the country may have to face the reality of being forced to source maids from other countries. - The Malaysian Insider
BN component parties split over meaning of ‘unity government’
By Syed Jaymal Zahiid and Debra Chong - The Malaysian Insider
KUALA LUMPUR, June 25 – Their boss may be selling the 1 Malaysia concept but other Barisan leaders have many different ideas about his take on unity.
In response to the prime minister’s call to PAS to reconsider unity talks for the sake of Malay-Muslim unity, MCA leaders said any talk about unity should be based on national and not racial interests.
But some MIC leaders believe that there is nothing wrong with Najib’s and Umno’s intentions, arguing that unity among the majority race is integral in ensuring the country’s growth.
Datuk Seri Najib Razak yesterday seemed to resuscitate the whole unity government idea when he called on the Islamist party to forget their political differences and co-operate with Umno in the name of Malay-Muslim unity.
Umno has, however, rejected any notion of a multi-racial Pakatan Rakyat(PR)-Barisan Nasional (BN) unity government, saying that it was interested in engaging only with PAS, sparking concerns among its non-Malay allies.
MCA leaders like Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai, the party’s vice president, did not want to comment on Najib’s statement but said that any form of unity talks should be based on pluralism.
Liow, who is also the Health Minister, said the unity government concept itself, first proposed by a faction in PAS, is vague, and unclear as to whether the unity government idea involved only PAS and Umno, or the entire PR-BN lot.
Backing him is Deputy Education Minister Wee Ka Siong, the MCA Youth chief, who said that his party had never thought of engaging rivals, the DAP, about Chinese unity.
“What for? I believe MCA’s stand about this is clear from the beginning. Any engagement with any quarters should be of national and not racial interest,” he told The Malaysian Insider in Parliament today.
But as far as MIC is concerned, the racial undertone in the unity government idea is not something to be worried about.
Its information chief, Datuk M. Saravanan, said the country is not prepared for national unity given its young age, arguing that unity among the majority race superceded other issues.
“I totally agree with Najib. It is important for the majority to be united and the minority divided as the majority is at the forefront of the country’s development,” he said.
For Saravanan, a deputy Federal Territories minister, the country is not ready for a Bangsa Malaysia (Malaysian race).
Meanwhile, Datuk Joseph Salang Gandum, the Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) MP for Julau, is fully supportive of Najib’s calls for Malay and Muslim unity to pave the way for 1 Malaysia.
“My view is that there is nothing wrong with any group wanting to be united,” Salang told The Malaysian Insider today.
“What we are against is if they unite to suppress others,” he added.
He disagrees with Lim Kit Siang’s view that Malay-Muslim unity talks between Umno and PAS, if it takes place, will stunt Najib’s goal of closing the growing gap among the different races and religious groups.
The PRS information chief said that for national unity to happen, the people within the same religious and ethnic groups must first be united.
Inquest called for death in police custody
By Zedeck Siew
thenutgraph.com
KUALA LUMPUR, 25 June 2009: The spouse of A Gnanapragasam wants the Home Ministry to hold an immediate inquest into his death while in police custody.
"I am very unsatisfied with all that has happened to my husband," said M Manamegala, Gnanapragasam's spouse, in a memorandum submitted to deputy minister Jelaing Mersat in Parliament today.
Gnanapragasam, a 53-year-old burglary suspect, was arrested in Damansara Damai on 10 June 2009. He was found dead in the Bandar Sri Damansara police station lock-up four days later. The police initially claimed that his death was related to drug addiction.
A post-mortem would later find that Gnanapragasam died because of a massive stomach infection.
"I question the actions of the police, who did not provide medical treatment for my husband, or send him to hospital," Manamegala said.
Manamegala with Tian Chua (left) and Elizabeth Wong
In her memorandum, Manamegala said she met with her husband on 12 June.
"When I saw my husband, I was very shocked because his right eye was swollen. He told me that he had been beaten by police after his arrest," Manamegala said. "That was the last time I met my husband."
Manamegala received a phone call on 14 June from the police, informing her of her husband's death. When viewing Gnanapragasam's body, Manamegala said she discovered bruises.
"This is hard evidence of my husband's claims that he was beaten by the police while in custody," Manamegala said.
She called on Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein to hold an inquest immediately into her husband's death, as well as into other deaths in police custody.
"I am very disturbed to find that there are many deaths in the lock-up into which no inquests have been held," Manamegala said.
In Parliament today, Manamegala was accompanied by Pakatan Rakyat (PR) elected representatives such as parliamentarians R Sivarasa (Subang-PKR) and Tian Chua (Batu-PKR), and Bukit Lanjan state assemblyperson Elizabeth Wong.
"I urge the federal government to form an independent commission to investigation deaths in police lock-up," Wong said in a press statement delivered in Parliament.
"The total number of such deaths is increasing, and are shameful," she added.
Wong and other PR elected representatives again petitioned the government to form a Coroner's Court and an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) to tackle the issue.PKR’s Thiruvenggadam replies to show-cause letter
By Deborah Loh
thenutgraph.com
PETALING JAYA, 25 June 2009: Petaling Jaya city councillor A Thiruvenggadam said his expose on contracts between the Pakatan Rakyat state government and waste management company Alam Flora is a state government matter for which his party, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), should not punish him.
Thiruvenggadam today replied to a show-cause letter from PKR asking him to show proof of his allegation that the PR state government divided Alam Flora contracts among the PR's three parties in this way: 40% to PKR, 30% to PAS and 30% to DAP. He said the contracts were given to supporters of these political parties.
"My answer is that this is a state matter, not a party matter. Also, the Selangor Menteri Besar has promised to set up an audit committee to investigate my claims," Thiruvenggadam, who is also the vice-president of the Petaling Jaya Selatan PKR division, said.
The show-cause letter was issued by his division's acting chairperson Shariffudin Budin on 18 June 2009. The letter gave Thiruvenggadam seven days, which expires today, to reply.
Thiruvenggadam
Thiruvenggadam said to his knowledge, the audit committee promised by Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim in response to his allegations has not been established.
"The committee can come to me first and I will give them leads as to who and where to investigate," he told The Nut Graph at his office today.
He is also "not bothered" with the possibility that his expose would see the end of his career as a councillor.
The state government is to announce new appointments or term-extensions of Selangor local councillors next month. Thiruvenggadam is said to be on the list of those who will be dropped.
"If I'm dropped for speaking the truth, I'm not bothered, it is the state government's right to appoint me. I will just leave it to the public to judge," he said.
Whistle-blower
Thiruvenggadam considered himself a whistle-blower even if it means exposing his own party or PR.
Sivarasa He disagreed with PKR vice-president R Sivarasa, who said that there was "no harm" for politicians to recommend contractors to Alam Flora, since the waste management company still made the final decision.
"Contracts should be given out through open balloting. Otherwise, we are not changing from the old policies and practices of Barisan Nasional," Thiruvenggadam said.
He said he raised alarm bells on the Alam Flora contracts about two months ago after he learnt of it from a councillors' meeting with Petaling Jaya Mayor Mohamad Roslan Sakiman, who mentioned the 40-30-30 breakdown.
Asked if he had any physical proof of the figures, he said the directive to divide the contracts that way was "likely an understanding and not in black and white".
But he said he felt vindicated when Khalid announced that the state government would begin conducting open balloting for the contracts. Khalid had said that a new mechanism to "allow all eligible companies equal opportunities to be appointed" would be in place in about a month's time.
Thiruvenggadam said he only wanted the PR state government to adopt changes and undo past BN policies in the procurement and awarding of contracts.
"I want PR to stay on in power. But if they don't change, the democratic process will play its part and they will eventually be voted out," he said.
Following his expose on the Alam Flora contracts, DAP's information chief Tony Pua called on the Selangor government to hold competitive tenders for the contracts.
In his blog, Pua also disagreed with Sivarasa's stance on allowing politicians to recommend contractors, saying, "Political parties have no position, business or role in putting forward names of preferred contractors for the purposes of municipal council contracts".
Thiruvenggadam is said to be the most vocal of Petaling Jaya City Council or MBPJ councillors. He writes a weekly column in Tamil daily Malaysia Nanban in which he exposes lopsided contracts and other issues affecting the Indian Malaysian community.ISA review includes revising detention period
By Zedeck Siew
thenutgraph.com
KUALA LUMPUR, 25 June 2009: The Home Ministry may table amendments to the Internal Security Act (ISA) in the next parliamentary sitting that will include a re-examination of the length of detention and the appointment of independent investigators.
Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said that among others, the ministry would re-examine the ISA's 60-day detention period.
"In the UK, to address issues of terrorism, they have put in place a detention period of 28 days. We can look into the propriety of this [for Malaysia]," he told a press conference in Parliament after answering questions in the Dewan Rakyat about the ISA.
Hishammuddin also revealed that the ministry would limit the number of extension orders, which allow detainees to be held indefinitely for two-year terms at the minister's discretion.
He added that apart from the appointment of independent investigation officers, the ministry would also review the ISA's definition of "threats to national security and public peace".
"Maybe when the ISA was first enacted in the 1960s, it was the communists. But today, it is militant networks and extremist movements," Hishammuddin said.
Hishammuddin"That is why the [list of definitions] must be included in our review process," he added, citing the case of Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) leader Mas Selamat Kastari, who was captured in Johor in April.
"I hope to table [the ISA amendment] in the next session," Hishammuddin added, referring to the 19 Oct to 15 Dec 2009 Parliamentary sitting.
Reviewing the ISA was one of the moves promised by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in his inaugural speech on 3 April.
Overhaul
Hishammuddin said the Home Ministry's efforts to amend the ISA was part of a concerted effort to update all 33 laws that empower the minister.
"We want to look at all these laws, as a whole," Hishammuddin said, adding that they required an overhaul to address contemporary challenges to national security.
Hishammuddin stressed that this process would involve all stakeholders.
"I've already formed committees of all the relevant agencies in the ministry. We will engage all the non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that are interested," Hishammuddin said, adding that many of the ideas about reforming the ISA "came from the public".
However, when asked what steps the ministry was taking to engage the public in the review process, Hishammuddin answered that he had to "sort out" the ministry first.
"In the last two and a half months, I have gathered all the legal minds in the Home Ministry to [study this reform effort]," Hishammuddin said.
"We have to set our house in order, before we meet the public," he added.
Hishammuddin denied that he had a "government knows best" mindset when it came to issues such as reform of the ISA, as alleged by the opposition.
Khalid Samad During his presentation about ISA reform in Parliament, Hishammuddin was heckled by several opposition Members of Parliament (MPs), including former ISA detainee Khalid Samad (Shah Alam-PAS).
Another MP, Dr Lo' Lo' Mohd Ghazali (Titiwangsa-PAS) pointed out that, if there was sufficient evidence to prove wrongdoing, there was no reason why ISA detainees could not be charged in court.
Rebutting, Hishammuddin said that detainees could not be charged in court to "protect the safety of witnesses in these cases".
"Lives are at stake," he stressed.Roundtable Conference: Developing A Comprehensive Policy Framework For Refugees & Asylum-Seekers
Contributed by Vilashini Vijayan
The Bar Council organised a Roundtable Conference entitled “Developing A Comprehensive Policy Framework For Refugees & Asylum-Seekers” on 23 June 2009. 41 participants attended the Roundtable including representatives from SUHAKAM, UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC, MMA and other members of civil society concerned about the treatment meted out to refugees.
The objective of the Roundtable was to consider current practices and to develop a comprehensive policy framework to enhance the social protection of refugees and asylum seekers. The main areas that were discussed include Fair Protection Process, Detention, Basic Needs and Livelihood, Trafficking and Regional Perspectives.
The paper presenters discussed the current situation of refugees and asylum seekers in the country and suggested both short term and long term recommendations to improve the situation.
The Roundtable generated a healthy discussion and highlighted the issues and problems faced by refugees and asylum seekers.
The Committee is in the process of finalising the recommendations.
Religious duty to have unity talks? More like religious duty to dismantle anti-Islamic race-based politics
by Nathaniel Tan
Bodohla, si Najib ni. First:
Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak today said the Barisan Nasional government has the capacity to continue administering the country even without the formation of the proposed unity government.
According to Bernama, the prime minister said the BN government was strong and had the capability to implement its development programmes.
As such, the question of the BN government being weak so much so that there was a need for a unity government did not arise.
He said the government had merely responded positively to a proposal by PAS for a unity government.
Then, religious duty kononnya:
Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak said many people, especially those from the Malay NGOs, are disappointed that unity talks between Umno and PAS have failed to materialise.
“It looks like many Muslims are of the same opinion because unity and efforts to fight for Islam are an obligation,” he told reporters today.
“When we follow the obligation, we get blessings for whatever we do. If Islam promotes that, then we should follow its way. Don’t let politics (political differences) become the obstacle (against) achieving this.”
So? Which is it? You want or you dowan?
With all due respect, I do not quite concur with YB Lim’s response:
DAP’s parliamentary opposition leader Lim Kit Siang today said he did not understand how a Malay unity talk proposed between Umno and PAS was not against the concept of 1Malaysia.
Commenting on Najib’s remarks, Lim said he was caught by surprise with the prime minister’s stand that a unity government between Umno and PAS would not go against the 1Malaysia concept.
He asked if the prime minister would then approve other races from opposing political divides to hold their own unity talks.
“Is Najib saying it is alright with Chinese unity talks or Indian unity talks…Iban unity talks?” he asked at a press conference in Parliament today.
You see, these ‘unity talks’ haven’t the slightest thing to do with cross party Malayness or Islam.
It has everything to do with the political survival of Umno.
It’s very simple: non-Malay support for BN is almost as good as dead. Pakatan probably hasn’t done the best job imaginable of consolidating their gains, but if they were to *really* close ranks (and up their game a little in the governance of their 4 states), they would deal the death blow which unsustainably (especially with Pas on the other side) mono-ethnic Umno is fearing so much.
It is this worry of extinction that is making Najib dance circles around himself, at first being all sombong, and then doing a 180 to turn and say: actually yes, I still want to try and court Pas and break up Pakatan.
The right response is exactly what was said by the Pakatan leadership recently: BN, you can go fly kite.
If you ask me, consolidating and remaining consistent with that stand is the best way to dismantle racial politics - the single largest obstacle to *true* unity.
“O Mankind, We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know each other. Verily the most honored of you in the sight of God is he who is the most righteous of you” (Quran 49:13).
Understand 1Malaysia Concept To Avoid Being Misled By Opposition: DPM
IPOH, June 25 (Bernama) -- The '1Malaysia' concept should be understood by all Malaysians so as not to be misled by the opposition who are only out to twist it around for their own political interests, said Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
He said the concept espoused by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak put the people's interests first so that the nation continued to remain united.
"Through the concept, Malaysians of all races and religions can continue to live in peace and harmony under the Barisan Nasional (BN) umbrella. It will also allow us to seek greater progress for all," he told a people's gathering at the official residence of the Perak Menteri Besar here Thursday night.
He said the Opposition's twisting things regarding the concept was a feeble attempt to sow confusion among the people.
"No one can deny that BN's approach in all these years had put the people's interest foremost," he said.
Muhyiddin also said the 10th Malaysia Plan (2011 to 2105) would place emphasis on issues and problems of the people that had not been resolved yet.
"The interests of the Malays, Chinese, Indians and the various ethnic groups in Sabah and Sarawak will all be given due emphasis. The BN will deliver the goods," he said, adding that bureacratic hurdles standing in the way of achieving the goal would also be tackled resolutely.
Muhyiddin then held a closed-door meeting with the Perak Umno liaison committee before leaving for Kuala Lumpur from the Sultan Azlan Shah Airport here.
Memorandum of the BLACK day of Perak submitted to SUHAKAM
On the 26thMay09 the Pakatan Rakyat organized a 3day “hunger strike” a protest to the seizing of power of the legitimate government of Perak by the Barisan Government.
The Hunger strike commenced at about 9am at the Ipoh DAP HQ. Thereafter at 11am many of the participants had to proceed to attend the filing of a court case at the High Court of Ipoh. As we were leaving the building many ordinary people were on the road side and the presence of the police was over whelming.
Suddenly the police announced us to disperse while we were walking on the road or the five foot way near the HQ DAP Perak. Many of us were heading to the High Court, Ipoh. DSP Glen then announced on his microphone 1,2,3 and ordered his men to arrest us.
As a result of the above incident to all the 9 elected representatives who were arrested prepared a memorandum on the event and submitted to the Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) to day. On the 26thMay09 a total of 21 individuals were arrested. The memorandum was accepted by the Commissioners Tan Sri Simon and Dato Siva Subramaniaam on behalf of SUHAKAM.
Tan Sri Simon mentioned that although SUHAKAM has been forwarding its recommending and findings to Parliament to date no action has been taken on them. Infact the yearly report to Parliament has not even found it listed for debate.
I said the call for SUHAKAM to hold a public inquiry on the incident of 26thMay09 should be considered seriously. The arrest of so elected reps in Perak is a black day. The Human Right’s body is like a toothless tiger and the government of the day should arm the body with laws for it to act independently. I also lamented that the Police should be a political and should not take side in the present political crisis in Perak. The overwhelming presence of the police all over near the Perak DAP HQ is just a waste of public funds. In fact the police should concentrate on police work like fighting crime rather then be involved in political matters.
On details of the memorandum and pictures kindly visit http://idhamlim.blogspot.com
The Hunger strike commenced at about 9am at the Ipoh DAP HQ. Thereafter at 11am many of the participants had to proceed to attend the filing of a court case at the High Court of Ipoh. As we were leaving the building many ordinary people were on the road side and the presence of the police was over whelming.
Suddenly the police announced us to disperse while we were walking on the road or the five foot way near the HQ DAP Perak. Many of us were heading to the High Court, Ipoh. DSP Glen then announced on his microphone 1,2,3 and ordered his men to arrest us.
As a result of the above incident to all the 9 elected representatives who were arrested prepared a memorandum on the event and submitted to the Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) to day. On the 26thMay09 a total of 21 individuals were arrested. The memorandum was accepted by the Commissioners Tan Sri Simon and Dato Siva Subramaniaam on behalf of SUHAKAM.
Tan Sri Simon mentioned that although SUHAKAM has been forwarding its recommending and findings to Parliament to date no action has been taken on them. Infact the yearly report to Parliament has not even found it listed for debate.
I said the call for SUHAKAM to hold a public inquiry on the incident of 26thMay09 should be considered seriously. The arrest of so elected reps in Perak is a black day. The Human Right’s body is like a toothless tiger and the government of the day should arm the body with laws for it to act independently. I also lamented that the Police should be a political and should not take side in the present political crisis in Perak. The overwhelming presence of the police all over near the Perak DAP HQ is just a waste of public funds. In fact the police should concentrate on police work like fighting crime rather then be involved in political matters.
On details of the memorandum and pictures kindly visit http://idhamlim.blogspot.com
Thursday, 25 June 2009
Arrest Warrant Revoked and SubPoena served inside Court
Kuala Lumpur Majistrate Court has revoked arrest warrant issued against myself two days ago.
Magistrate Mohd Faizi Che Abu, who also Coroner of ongoing K Sujatha’s inquest made the decision after hearing explanation from myside and my lawyer Mr. N Surendran.
The court was told that :
a) Subpoena was not served due to lack of initiative by police and DPP office. We are foresee lack of proper planning by those involved here.
b) As a Member of Parliament , I had attended the on going Parliament proceedings. Further local news papers covered my activities proving I not hiding or avoiding sub poena.
Why should I avoid sub peona, when myself had pushed for the inquest rather then anyone else in Malaysia.
Probably for the first time in Malaysian History a Subpoena was served inside a court room today.
The Veil: Sarkozy is right
| Written by Kazi Mahmood | |
 He is right in when he made a speech in the French Parliament on Monday 22 June 2009 in which he reiterates that the "Islamic burka (abaya) is not welcomed in France." Note that this is not the first time a French top gun make such a statement and it is now with very little surprise that many Muslims within and outside France take such statements. He is right because he was talking about France in the auguste French Parliament and in front of French law makers and other freedom right 'fighers' of European origin. Yes they are right fighters too. And many Muslims are wrong in condemning Sarkozy. Not totally, absolutely wrong but they are wrong in criticizing him and accusing him of 'anti-semitism' against Islam. No one expects Sarkozy, a man from a Jewish mother, to be fair to Islam and Muslims. If someone expected this guy to be fair to Muslims on Islamic issues and to state that the abaya is to be allowed in France and on France streets, then that person would have been naive. I admire though the Muslims who take position against people like Sarkozy when he addresses Islamic issues. For the issue of the scarf is an Islamic issue not a Muslim one alone. There is a clear distinction that is to be made between the things that are 'Islamic' and the things that are 'Muslim'. That we will explain in another posting. My dear friend and brother YB Zulkifli Nordin from the Party Keadilaan Rakyat (PKR) said he is not surprised at the statement by Sarkozy. He added that such a statement coming from 'a person the like of Sarkozy, a person who felt so proud and honored that his wife's nude photo were sold to the highest bidder; a person who was so impressed to have as a wife a women who spread her leg totally naked and splashed centrepage of nude magazine Penthouse.'
 Carla Bruni Sarkozy the Tramp woman in nude...thats a Sarkozy affiar! Though I understand and admire my brother Zulkifli on this, I think we should not go into mud-slinging and into personal attacks. Sarkozy is a french liberal - an extremist liberal - and is allowed to believe that naked wives are prizes that should not be taken away from him. He also believe that 'in France' where he President for that matter, no women should be allowed to walk in dresses that make them 'subservient' and 'deprives them of their identity'. The President said in France, 'We cannot accept to have in our country women who are prisoners behind netting, cut off from all social life, deprived of identity.' and that is fine with me. He is talking about France. France is not a Muslim state and will not be a Muslim state as long as there are people like Sarkozy as President. The French people, once docile and anti-American in their thinking has shifted their views and became pro-George - What the Fuck - Bush and voted in as President of France Nichola - Pervert - Sarkozy. What do you expect? Sarkozy to wear the Abaya? For the Muslims, and here my brother Zulkifli Nordin is right and is examplary, the ladies must cover themselves in dignity. Even the ruling Malay party in Malaysia, deemed a socialist entity by the Islamic party spirirual leader Nik Aziz Nik Mat, abides by the rule that women must be covered in dignity and in respect to Allah. This is in Malaysia not in France where Sarkozy the pervert is in power and accepts all kind of nude women, strolling in shopping centres and carrying their men and babies behind them with Sarkozy dutifully following his new wife too in that culture. It is the French culture that speaks and it is not a Muslim President who spoke in the French Parliament. For once let Sarkozy has his way in his own country but let us also promise ourselves that if Sarkozy were to attack Muslims outside France and were to promote such nudist cultures that his wife follows and he follows alongside Italian Premier Berlusconi, then it will be war. "And may I warn you Mr. Sarkozy, if you were ever to touch any of the Muslim women in your damn country, oppressing and harassing them and forcing them to live the nomadic and barbaric life that you so adore; then we Muslim will consider that as an act of war on Muslim and shall be responded accordingly," said Zulkifli Bin Noordin on Wednesday 24 June. To me, the war starts (cultural war) against the French nudists and the European and white masters anti-Islamic cultural standing if they start to point out that Malaysia or Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations should let their women walk naked with Sarkozy in the streets of Kuala Lumpur or Jeddah. That is going to be war waged by all Muslims not only by Kazi Mahmood or Zulkifli Nordin. But as long as they are within their borders in their nations, let them be. Live and let others live! |
Remember what we wrote on 7 November 2007?
Two years ago, Malaysia Today revealed something very interesting that probably did not mean much to most readers. Well, recently, there have been some very interesting developments regarding this issue -- so maybe it is time we revisited what we wrote then. In Part 1, today, read what we wrote then. More will be revealed in the next episode of this series with some damaging evidence as well.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
We must take note of one thing here. The police officer, the Director of the Commercial Crimes Investigation Department (CCID), was not being investigated for accumulating the alleged RM27 million in assets. They are not concerned with how he accumulated those assets over 37 years of service. They are just concerned with the fact that he did not declare them. His ‘crime’, therefore, was not in how he acquired those assets but in not declaring them. There is no crime involved here as far as the accumulation of assets is concerned. The ‘crime’ is that he did not declare them.
The Director of the CCID engaged Rosli as his solicitor. It was Rosli’s job as the solicitor to reply to the ACA query. And Rosli did. And for doing exactly what the Federal Constitution of Malaysia says every Malaysian citizen has a right to do -- to engage a lawyer and defend himself/herself against a criminal allegation -- Rosli himself came under the ACA investigation.
The ACA then asked Rosli to also declare his assets. Rosli wrote back asking for further clarification but the ACA ignored his query. Instead, they came to his office and in full view of the office staff arrested him, handcuffed him while roughly manhandling him resulting in injury, and threw him into the lockup for the night. The following day, Rosli was charged for failing to comply to an ACA directive.
Soon after that, the Director of the CCID too was arrested and charged for failure to declare his assets. He was slapped with four charges but the figure did not come to the RM27 million that was initially leaked to the media. How this RM27 million figure came about and who leaked it to the media will remain a mystery. Nevertheless, the charge stated a figure slightly over RM1 million and nowhere near the RM27 million that everyone thought was involved here.
But Rosli was not the only victim. The CCID Director’s two sisters too were taken in by the ACA. And it was reported that as soon as the Director left to perform his Umrah (small Haj), they brought his sisters in again to extract a ‘confession’ from them.
Ealier, similar tactics were used against another police officer. In this case, the wife and children of this particular police officer were detained by the ACA and he was asked to report to the ACA office if he would like to see his family released. They then took his statement, which was used to charge him later. But that is not the icing on the cake here. What would be the icing on the cake is that in the seven charges filed against him and his subordinate, the names of the informers or whistle-blowers were mentioned. This is as good as signing the death warrants of the whistle-blowers. Now, the organised crime syndicate knows who spilled the beans. How long do you think they have to live?
You want to be a Good Samaritan and help people in distress? You want to ‘assist’ the police and ACA in reducing the crime rate in Malaysia by becoming a whistle-blower? You want to do the job you are paid to do: that is, arresting criminals who are a danger to society? Please say ‘no’ to all three questions. And why is that? I will allow the following newspaper reports and documents speak for themselves. See whether you can figure out which are the police officers, which are the criminals, and which are the whistle-blowers. A word of caution though, it is not that easy to tell one from the other. And the whistle-blowers’ names have been documented on the charge sheet below. So this means their death warrants have already been signed by the ACA.
Oh, and one more thing, the ACA is actually feared and not respected, but only by those who go against the powers-that-be and refuse to obey those who walk in the corridors of power.
Three more cops held for falsifying witnesses’ statements
By LOURDES CHARLES
The Star, 24 October 2007
Three police officers – a deputy superintendent, assistant superintendent and sergeant – were arrested by the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) for falsifying witnesses’ statements leading to the arrest of a businessman in Johor. The trio – from the Commercial Crimes Department (CCID) in Bukit Aman – were arrested at their office in Bukit Perdana by ACA officers yesterday. They are expected to be charged at the Jalan Duta Sessions Court today.
ACA Director-general Datuk Ahmad Said Hamdan confirmed the arrests but declined to elaborate. It is learnt that the three allegedly falsified the witnesses’ statements to frame charges against a man, alleging that he was involved in illegal activities. The businessman was arrested under the Emergency Ordinance and placed under Restricted Residence in an east coast state.
The arrest of the three is the second such arrest by the ACA involving police officers and personnel falsifying witnesses’ statements. The ACA had on Oct 2 arrested two police officers who allegedly tried to frame Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan by forging and tampering with witnesses’ statements, claiming that Musa had freed three people detained under the Emergency Ordinance after receiving RM2mil.
The two – a chief Inspector and a lance corporal – were arrested in Kuantan and Kluang.
Two policemen held for falsifying statements
By LOURDES CHARLES
The Star, 3 Oct 2007
Two police officers who allegedly tried to frame Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan by falsifying and tampering with witness statements have been arrested. The two, a chief inspector and a lance corporal, were arrested in Kuantan and Kluang yesterday. They are both in their 40s.
ACA director-general Datuk Ahmad Said Hamdan said they allegedly falsified the statements of seven witnesses as a basis to arrest three people under the Emergency Ordinance 1969 by claiming that they were members of a gaming syndicate. “As a result, the three were arrested by police officers from the Kluang district police headquarters on March 30,” he said.
The three men were freed after investigations into their cases and allegations arose of Musa ordering the three people to be freed after receiving RM2mil.
Ahmad Said said investigations showed that when the three were detained, Musa had received information that they had been framed. He said Musa ordered CID officers from the intelligence and operations division to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter. ACA investigations later revealed that the IGP did not order or issue any instruction to release the three, he added.
“However, the IGP said if there was any abuse of power or fabrication of evidence, then they must be released,” he said. Ahmad Said added that CID investigations also revealed that the seven who were detained denied ever giving statements to the Kluang police about the involvement of the three people in a gaming syndicate.
As a result, the three were freed in April.
The chief inspector was arrested in Kuantan at about 3pm yesterday when he was called in for questioning while the lance corporal was arrested in Kluang at about 11pm. The officer who was arrested in Kuantan was previously in Kluang where he was attached to the anti-vice and gaming division.
Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail said both were expected to be charged today with forgery and with using as genuine a forged document.
If convicted they could be jailed up to two years or a fine or both for each of the offence.
Home Ministry hopes to amend ISA in October, 32 other Acts to follow
By Shannon Teoh - The Malaysian InsiderKUALA LUMPUR, June 25 — The government hopes to amend up to 33 laws which involve discretionary powers to the home minister, beginning with the controversial Internal Security Act (ISA), in the next Parliament session.
Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein (picture) said that this was because most of them were enacted during an era when the country was under greater threat in its formative years, especially from communist insurgents.
He said that laws such as the Restricted Residence Act which allows confinement of a person to a restricted area and the Crime Prevention Act which governs a policeman's powers of arrest were drafted "before I was born" and were now outdated.
"I hope to table it in the next session," he said of the ISA, referring to the Oct 19 to Dec 15 sitting of Parliament.
Since a review of the ISA was promised by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in his maiden speech as premier back in April, the government has been mulling several changes to the law.
This includes reducing the 60-day detention period without a remand order from a court. Hishammuddin cited the 28-day period implemented in Britain as a comparison.
He also said that his ministry was looking at limiting the number of extension orders which allow detainees to be held for two years at the minister's discretion, the appointment of independent investigating officers and a review of the list of items that are considered to be threats to peace and security.
The Sembrong MP also refuted claims from the opposition that he was maintaining a "government knows best" attitude towards the ISA by stating that the proposals being considered had come from the public and non-governmental organisations.
He claimed that Pakatan Rakyat was only upset because by introducing these public-proposed amendments, "they are losing bullets to shoot during ceramahs to say that the government is not listening to the public."
The home minister also said that the opposition was welcome to submit proposals but that the government would not engage them in discussions as "their behaviour in Parliament shows that they will say anything we do is wrong and not be rational and mature."
He was referring to the constant heckling he received as he tried to reply to a question on the ISA during the question and answer session in the morning.
He had stated that since 2004, 100 individuals had been detained under the Act but only 12 are still being held, half of whom are foreigners.
RM12.5 billiion PKFZ scandal – Parliament entitled to know the reasons why the Cabinet chopped and changed week-by-week its decision in October/Novemb
By Lim Kit Siang,
Today’s Star under the report “PKFZ probe under wraps for now” reads:
Malaysian Anti-Corruption (MACC) is not obliged to disclose the progress of investigations into the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).
PAC member William Leong (PKR-Selayang) said MACC Commissioner had informed the PAC that the PKFZ issue was still under probe and Section 29 of the MACC Act 2008 does not allow the commission to disclose any information about the investigation to the PAC.
Unfortunately we were unable to get any information as to the situation of the investigation, when the investigation will end and whether any action would be taken against anyone,” he said.
Leong said he was disappointed with MACC’s reply, adding that several reports over the PKFZ were lodged with MACC, or ACA, since w2004.
Chief Commissioner Datuk Seri Ahmad Hamdan had spent an hour at the PAC meeting yesterday but did not reveal the investigation into the alleged irregularities in PKFZ.”
What the MACC Chief Commissioner had committed is no less than parliamentary contempt in refusing to co-operate with the PAC in its investigations into the PKFZ scandal.
Why is Ahmad suddenly so shy about reporting the progress of MACC investigations into the PKFZ scandal when he had no hesitation to go to the public about MACC investigations into the allegations of abuses of power and corrupt practices against the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor Mentri Besar, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim over cars and cows?
The MACC should rightly stand for “Malaysian Agency for Cars and Cows”!
The MACC has proved its utter lack of independence when it could be dragooned into serving the Barisan Nasional political agenda in its illegal power grab in Perak to harass the legitimate Pakatan Rakyat Perak Speaker V. Sivakumar.
The Star today has another report, headlined: “Lim Know the facts, say Ong“, which reads:
PETALING JAYA: DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang deliberately misled the Dewan Rakyat on the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) issue despite knowing the facts of the project, Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat said.
Ong said Lim knew about the RM25 per square foot land purchase as he was engaged in the debate in Parliament, in 2007.
“He rudely interrupted my ministerial statement by accusing me of not referring to the Cabinet decision on Oct 23, 2002, that the land should be acquired at a lower price of RM10.16 per square foot.
“What Kit Siang conveniently omitted to mention was that the decision on Oct 23, was subsequently superseded by the Cabinet in its meeting on Nov 6, 2002,” he said in his blog (www.teekeat.net) yesterday.
Ong challenged Lim to admit that he had deliberately misled and confused the public by failing to disclose the full and proper account of Cabinet decisions on the PKFZ project.
“The DAP leader may not be a Cabinet member but the Parliamentary Hansard, dated Sept 4, 2007, clearly recorded that the decision of the Cabinet on Oct 2, 2002 to purchase the land at RM25 per square foot continued to stand for the reasons mentioned in my parliamentary statement,” he said.
Ong said Lim knew this and he was in fact engaged in a debate on this matter on Sept 4, 2007.
“He even posted excerpts of the Hansard in his blog the very next day.
“And yet he chose to suppress this important fact from the public for the sake of a political gimmick bent on rescuing his fading political career,” Ong said.
I find this accusation by Ong, more appropriately referred to as the Minister for Air Shows, most astounding.
It must be the first case not only in Malaysia but in Commonwealth parliamentary history where a Cabinet Minister accuses an Opposition MP for not telling the whole truth about Cabinet decisions on a project, in this case the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal!
Ong claims to be incensed that I had not mentioned the Nov. 6, 2002 Cabinet meeting when he was presenting his Ministerial statement in Parliament on Monday.
How could I do so when even to mention the Oct. 23, 2002 Cabinet decision, there were so many protests and objections from the Barisan Nasional Ministers and MPs, led by Ong himself.
Did Ong allow me to talk and reveal more? Didn’t he take the position that with regard to his ministerial statement, no question or interruptions were allowed?
Yes, I knew about the November 4, 2002 Cabinet meeting, but it was Ong who misled Parliament with a selective account in his Ministerial statement while refusing to allow me to say anything to correct him.
This is why I had challenged Ong to give a full account of all the Cabinet meetings and decisions in connection with the PKFZ project all the way back to 1999, especially the Cabinet decisions of October/November 2002 and July 2007.
PKFZ concerns not only the Transport Ministry but also the Finance Ministry. I hereby ask the Deputy Finance Minister, Datuk Dr. Awang Adek, who was also the Deputy Finance Minister in 2007, to give a full account in his reply of all the Cabinet meetings and decisions on PKFZ right from the very beginning.
In particular, Awang should state whether he could confirm the following Cabinet meetings and decisions:
- On 2nd October 2002, Cabinet agreed to the purchase of the land for the PKFZ project based on Transport Minister’s information that the project was viable and did not require any government financial assistance and that legal issues surrounding the land concerned had been resolved.
- On 9th October Cabinet agreed to defer implementation of the Oct. 2 decision, pending reports by Finance Ministry and Attorney-General’s Chambers.
- On 16th Oct. 2002, Cabinet informed of Attorney-General’s position that the land had too many encumbrances and “willing buyer, willing seller” transaction not proper. Finance Ministry asked to submit report.
- On 23rd October 2002, Cabinet agreed that land be acquired by Transport Ministry under section 3(1)(a) of Land Acquisition Act 1960 at RM10.16 psf. Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB) to be given the opportunity to level and build basic infrastructure at a price to be negotiated and to be finalized by the Finance Ministry if it is above RM100 million. Among the reasons why the Cabinet reversed the Oct. 2, 2002 decision were:
- The land has too many encumbrances with at least eight charges and five caveats and that Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSD) had made misrepresentation which may be fraudulent misrepresentation;
- That the issue of “willing buyer and willing seller” does not arise as KDSB was unable to transfer title free from encumbrance to the government;
- That from corporate information, KDSB was a company with bank liabilities.
- On 6th November, 2002 Cabinet reversed its decision of Oct. 23, 2002 and upheld its Oct. 2, 2002 decision.
Parliament is entitled to know what were the reasons which caused the Cabinet to chop and change week-by-week its decision on the PKFZ land question, which has landed the country with a RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)