Share |

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

HINDRAF at OBAMA’s inauguration on January 20, 2009.

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/01iu4gs2LW0Un/610x.jpg
HINDRAF will be at the inauguration of President Barrack H. Obama on the steps of the west front of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C led by its representative R.Shan from New York.

In conjunction with the inauguration theme “A New Birth of Freedom”, a letter from Uthayakumar who is currently in indefinite detention and the report “Malaysian Indian Minority & Human Right Violations 2008” will be handed over to the office of the incoming 44th President of the United States of America.

Thank you.

P. Waytha Moorthy
HINDRAF – Chairman

Obama plans ambitious first week, aides say

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President-elect Barack Obama will convene a meeting of his top economic advisers on Wednesday, his first full day in office, as the incoming president immediately tries to put the financial crisis at the center of his agenda, senior aides said.

Barack Obama, here Sunday at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, plans high-profile moves on Wednesday.

Barack Obama, here Sunday at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, plans high-profile moves on Wednesday.Three aides said Obama is planning an ambitious first week that will include several other high-profile moves: a Wednesday meeting with military brass to map out a change to the mission in Iraq, appointment of at least one envoy to deal quickly with the Mideast crisis and issuance of executive orders on issues ranging from the environment to the detainment of terror suspects.

Obama plans ambitious first week - aides

As soon as Obama is sworn in Tuesday, vans will take senior staff from the Capitol to the White House to begin working, two Obama transition officials said.

Twenty senior staff have had their paperwork cleared to enter the White House on Tuesday. Some senior staff will stay behind to attend the traditional lunch with the new president, but then they'll get to work, even as the inaugural parade snakes around the city, the officials said.

The bulk of the executive orders are not likely to be issued Tuesday because the incoming administration, in the words of one top aide, "does not want to cloud the first day" by overshadowing the historic swearing-in of Obama as the first African-American president.

Aides instead are pointing to Wednesday as a key marker. Obama is planning to bring together his top economic advisers to map out how to step up his personal lobbying efforts to get Congress to pass his stimulus plan, which has a price tag of $825 billion.

"We have got to get an economic recovery and reinvestment plan in place quickly to turn the economy around," said one senior aide, citing the financial crisis as the top priority.

And on Wednesday, Obama also will meet with top military commanders to discuss the war in Iraq and move to begin implementing his campaign promise of removing all combat troops within 16 months, according to aides. The move is part of an effort to reassure Obama's liberal supporters that despite his heavy focus on the financial crisis, he will stay focused on changing the mission in Iraq, the stance that first propelled his presidential campaign at the grass-roots level.

The Obama aides also revealed the Mideast crisis has shot to the top of the immediate agenda. The aides said Obama has been pushing behind the scenes for quick, decisive action, overriding the advice of some aides who believe getting active instantly may raise unrealistic expectations for Mideast peace.

The aides said one option under serious consideration is naming at least one high-profile envoy this week to help dig into the long-term problems in the region beyond the crisis in Gaza, a move that Obama hinted at last week in an interview with USA Today.

On CNN's "State of the Union With John King" on Sunday, incoming senior White House adviser David Axelrod said the president-elect "has said repeatedly that he intends to engage early and aggressively with diplomacy all over the world and using the men and women, the professionals who are in place, who are great, and -- where appropriate -- special envoys."

Pressed on whether this meant moving to deal with the Mideast crisis as soon as Tuesday, Axelrod said, "I think that the events around the world demand that he act quickly, and I think you'll see him act quickly."

Aides said the incoming president also is mulling several high-profile executive orders that can change U.S. policy with the simple stroke of a pen, particularly major changes to the approach in the war on terror. In addition to an executive order closing the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, aides said the incoming president is considering another executive order that would specifically ban the use of torture on terror suspects.

CNN has learned that another option under consideration is an executive order raising fuel efficiency on automobiles, a move that would please environmentalists but put more pressure on the struggling U.S. auto industry.

For now, however, aides are being tight-lipped about which executive orders will be issued.

Incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told reporters Saturday that "there are a number of things we're looking at" based on campaign promises the president-elect made on domestic and foreign policy.

Meanwhile, aides said Obama is strongly considering an economic speech to a joint session of Congress just weeks after taking office to communicate directly with the American people that the financial crisis is likely to continue for a long time -- even if his economic recovery plan is passed into law during the first 100 days.

Aides are expecting the speech to be delivered the week of February 23, after Congress returns from the Presidents Day recess. Democratic leaders are aiming to get the economic recovery plan to Obama's desk for his signature before that recess.

Obama has been trying to downplay expectations for quick results from his stimulus plan in recent speeches, which could give him some political breathing space to try and let the plan work.

"We're going to have a tough year, 2009," Obama told CNN in an interview Friday.

"I don't think that any economist disputes that we're in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression," he said. "The good news is that we're getting a consensus around what needs to be done. We've got to have a bold, aggressive reinvestment in a recovery package. It's working its way through Congress. That's going to help create 3 to 4 million new jobs."

Aides said the speech to a joint session of Congress is part of a broader strategy by the incoming president to "engage with the public" about the financial crisis to try and build trust with the American people.

Defeat 'spells trouble for Najib'

Anwar: PAS menang jika...

Sorry, just another wake-up call

JAN 19 – Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak described the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition’s loss in the Kuala Terengganu by-election last Saturday as a “setback” but said that it would do nothing to change the political landscape of the country.

Najib: KT loss is a setback but does not change the political landscape


He also said that the opposition’s victory did not mean that its strength was growing nor did it portend a disastrous outing for the Barisan in the next general election.

Najib, 55, will be prime minister in March after the current incumbent Abdullah Ahmad Badawi steps down and, for his sake, we hope he is right.

On Saturday, Abdul Wahid Endut from the opposition Parti Islam SeMalaysia (Pas) beat off Wan Farid Salleh from the United Malays National Organisation (Umno) by a majority of 2,631 votes. Wahid won a seat previously won by Umno by just 620 votes in a constituency that is almost 90 per cent ethnic Malay.

There are those, in Umno, who would argue that the contest was lost simply because Umno picked the wrong candidate – a person too closely identified with Abdullah and his son-in-law Khairy Jamaluddin, two people who aren’t very popular right now. They will point at former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who also attacked Wan Farid for the same reasons. And, Dr Mahathir still wields considerable influence.

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, a former finance minister and an elder statesman of Umno, puts it starkly: “This was more than a referendum on the leadership,” he said in an immediate reaction to the results: “It was a test of the relevance of Umno in its present form. If Umno is no longer relevant to the Malays, the BN (Barisan Nasional or the National Front) formula is dead. The Chinese will have no reason to support MCA and so on. The power-sharing consensual bargain on which our political system has been based since Independence is broken.”

“We are in uncharted waters with no one at the wheel,” the prince concluded.

Hyperbole? Alarmist? Actually, Tengku Razaleigh has always been reasonably consistent. Immediately after the March 8 general election last year, he warned that if Umno did not fundamentally change its ways, its culture of political patronage, all the baggage of having been in power since 1957, it would be repudiated by young voters who were sickened by the excess, the hubris.

Najib should know this better than most. He previously stressed the importance of the contest and the importance of blunting the opposition’s momentum ahead of state elections in Sarawak which could be called this year.

Then, there is Umno’s own elections in March, where all posts from deputy president downwards will be contested. If the party elects new leaders who aren’t perceived to be clean, who are stridently chauvinistic, then the party that has governed this country for the longest time could be in trouble.

All it takes is perception. In short, Umno must not only change – it must

be seen to have changed. – Business Times Singapore

Dr M cause of Umno's destruction, says Hindraf

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 19 - Attempting to give him a taste of his own medicine, the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) has claimed former president Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed to be the cause of Umno's current crisis.

The former prime minister has spent much of the past few years criticising his self-appointed successor Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi, culminating in acid attacks for causing the Umno-dominated Barisan Nasional's (BN) setback in last year's general election.

Today, Hindraf chairman P Waytha Moorthy said that it was in fact Dr Mahathir who was the "architect" of "corruption, nepotism, prejudice and cronyism" to Umno.

Welcoming Pakatan Rakyat (PR)'s by-election victory in Kuala Terengganu as a sign that the public is disgusted with Umno, he said that the public has lost any faith in finding honest politicians within BN.

"With Mahathirism's tutelage, the whole Barisan National clan is out of touch with the reality and the needs of the public for governance that is based on equality and fairness for all Malaysians," Waytha said in a statement to the press.

He added that Dr Mahathir's leadership of Umno and BN saw it fail to serve competently and the governing coalition now lives on "past glories" in "blatant arrogance and ignorance" of the will of the people.

"The absence of these elements has prompted the will of change from the public to restore integrity in our basic institutions," he continued.

Waytha said that unless BN faces the reality and listens to the people on issues like abolition of the Internal Security Act and equality in socio-development, "it will be digging its own grave."

"Listening to Mahathir will only speed up the process."

Umno’s choice

By Leslie Lau
Consultant Editor( Themalaysianinsider)

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 19 – When the 2,000-plus Umno delegates meet here in March for the party’s annual assembly and elections, they will be confronted with two choices.

They can vote in as their new leaders the few younger, progressive candidates or at least those who are not tainted by corruption and scandal.

Or they can plump for the same chauvinistic and corrupt leaders who eschew reforms and feel that the party just needs to be united and the Malays, in particular, will automatically back it.

Those who are planning to vote in the latter group would do well to consider what happened over the weekend in Kuala Terengganu when Pas and Pakatan Rakyat (PR) overcame their own problems to score a convincing win over Umno and Barisan Nasional (BN).

This was a more cohesive and united Umno campaign, especially when compared to the Permatang Pauh by-election, but despite having a party united behind the impending leadership of Datuk Seri Najib Razak, it lost.

“The trouble is Umno is perceived as an arrogant and corrupt party. There are very few Umno leaders who are not seen as tainted by scandal,” one Umno lawmaker told The Malaysian Insider. “That is something very difficult for us to accept or to shake off.”

While the choice for the next party president has already been made, Umno delegates still have a large field of candidates to choose from to fill the various party posts, from the deputy presidency downwards.

But signs so far suggest the delegates are still planning to cast their votes to the highest bidder.

Party insiders say large sums of money have been and are still being spent to attract votes, despite the best efforts of Umno’s top leadership in trying to curb vote-buying.

The Malaysian Insider understands a significant portion of funds meant for the Permatang Pauh and the Kuala Terengganu by-election were not utilised as some leaders holding the pursestrings had hoped to salt away the money for the party elections instead.

But if delegates vote for the kind of leadership perceived by the public to be corrupt and tainted by scandal, they will be perpetrating an image which has befallen the party and caused it to slowly but surely lose the support of ordinary Malaysians, as has been proven by its two electoral losses since its worst results ever in last March’s general election.

“They will be voting for the future of the party. So the question is, do they want the same old, or do they want some reforms,” said another senior Umno leader.

After the loss in Kuala Terengganu, the question of how Umno delegates vote will have an even more important bearing on whether voters, especially younger Malaysians, will support the party and BN.

A vote for reform could mean the party may have a fighting chance.

A vote for chauvinism and corruption may doom Umno, especially when confronted with the fact that, by the time the next general election is called, there could be between two and four million new voters deciding the political fate of the country.

Why as a Chinese I will always vote PAS

Letters
by Jonathan Tan

It has now been 51 years since independence, and although it was predominantly a Malay Archipelago, immigrants who had to work the land during the British colonial era; by default became citizens after Malaya attained independence in 1957.

Much was promised. Equal rights to jobs, educational and business opportunities. But all this came to naught in 1969 when Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia’ founding father, was unceremoniously sent into early retirement and hawks like Razak and Harun took over and used Malay special rights as their vehicle to build a corrupted society that saw the division between the have and have nots widen.

The process took a turn for the worse during the Mahathir era when he hand picked cronies to award contracts and kept privatized entities such as the Governments’ GLC’s in the government’s stables, obviating the very reason to privatize these entities.

Till this day, these organizations show neither discernible accountability nor transparency. The country bleeds like a wounded kancil.

The situation has become even more tenuous with the serious deterioration of educational standards, where instead of English, Malay was used as the medium of instruction in a multiracial ex-British colony of 300 years, further condemning the country’s young to an educational exposure far less then the previous generation had received all in the name of Malay nationalism and supremacy.

UMNO and Mahathir labeled Malaysia even Islamic with non-Malays forced to take Islamic studies at Universities. The 1957 dream was dead. For Malaysians were not equal neither in the eyes of the government nor the law. You can be a Muslim but you can never unMuslim yourself, so body snatching becomes a norm at funerals by overzealous religious authorities.

In 1957, the MIC and MCA were the designated community guardians to ensure minority rights were protected. But they did not only not protect their communities; they joined UMNO in pursuit of wealth many times for their own personal being at the expense of the rights of their communities.

As a Chinese or Indian Malaysian, you are now a second class citizen in this country born 51 years ago, left betrayed, unprotected and to fend for themselves on their own. Muslim Indonesians and Filipinos are made to feel welcome. Many get citizenships ostensibly to increase the Muslim majority.

But our guardians, MCA and MIC, still looked on squeezing it’s minorities virtually to leave this country. So that promise of 1957 was made to be broken. Or was it sabotaged along the way with the help of the MCA, MIC and later Gerakan.

Governance of the former Federated states had changed hands from our British colonial masters to UMNO. And no one was going to do anything about it.

Enter the Pakatan Rakyat. An inexperienced alternative composite of disparate parties who have significantly changed the political landscape. In the states of Penang, Perak and Selangor, they are beginning to show that even inexperienced administrators, given time may be able to deliver.

PAS on the hand appears fixated on relatively petty matters such as Islamic law when economy, education and health should be right on top of the agenda. But mathematically it is not possible for PAS to ever pass these laws.

Even, if they tried, the reassuring pronouncements of Karpal Singh has brought immense confidence to people like me , that in the event that PAS trys to pull a fast one, the DAP will pull out of the coalition causing the fragmentation and fall of the Federal government if they happen to form one.

This confidence far outstrips the current and ongoing blatant sell out of their communities by the MIC and MCA to UMNO, not that race based politics matter anymore.

Yes as a Chinese, I will vote in PAS anytime, anywhere in this country, because with the Pakatan Rakyat I can rest assured that the law as spelled out in our constitution will reign supreme, and pretenders like PAS will be stopped right in their tracks by the DAP unlike the shenanigans at the MIC and MCA who have now brought minorities to their knees by deceiving them of their rights by colluding with UMNO.

It was the British spy; Harold Philby who once said that “To betray you must first belong.” By belonging, the MCA, MIC and Gerakan have never hesitated for a minute to make full use of their belonging to betray and condemn their communities to a bleak and uncertain future.

Samy's challenger set to be expelled or suspended

By Baradan Kuppusamy, themalaysianinsider.com, Jan 19 2009

JAN 19 - MIC presidential challenger Datuk M. Muthupalaniappan is to face the party's Disciplinary Committee on Tuesday for allegedly tarnishing the "good image" of the party and faces either suspension or expulsion, opening the way for incumbent Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu to be returned unopposed for a 10th term as president.

"It would be a sham victory and we will not accept it," a senior MIC leader said on condition of anonymity, expressing the feelings among the party grassroots.

Muthupalaniappan denies the charges and will not appear before the committee, which is headed by Samy Vellu henchman Tan Sri G. Vadivello, because his terms to have not been met.

Because he will not turn up to answer the charges, he could be summarily suspended or expelled.

Either way, Muthupalaniappan's spirited challenge to defeat Samy Vellu, who has been president since 1979, will be over.

"I had hoped for a clean, free and fair fight but this is not the case," Muthupalaniappan told the Malaysian Insider in an interview. "If it is a fair fight I would have won hands down as the grassroots mood is really hostile. Everybody is crying out for change."

"These are really difficult times for the MIC and the community and a free and fair election that gives MIC delegates an open chance to choose would have been really very good for the party and the Indian community," he said.

Muthupalaniappan, a former MIC vice-president, is charged with tarnishing the party's image in several press statements last month.

Muthupalaniappan had declared last month he would challenge Samy Vellu and had since been crisscrossing the country, canvassing for support and was receiving enthusiastic response, but the charges have completely derailed his campaign.

He needs 50 nominations from MIC's 4,000 branches to qualify and was confident he could garner three times that number.

Party insiders said the decision to punish Muthupalaniappan under the catch-all "tarnishing the image of the party" is really designed to stop him from continuing with his challenge.

Muthupalaniappan is charged with tarnishing the good name of the party by questioning election losses suffered by the MIC on March 8 last year, the sacking of party leaders and the opening of branches and closing of branches in an election year.

The charges were made in a letter dated Dec 23 and signed by Vadivello.

Muthupalaniappan replied, denying the charges, and had asked for full details of the complaint and identity of the complainant.

He had also requested the party's Central Working Committee or CWC set up an independent inquiry committee if at all the inquiry was to go ahead because Vadivello was not impartial and besides had taken part in the decision to charge him.

However Muthupalaniappan did not receive any replies but was instead ordered to appear on Tuesday to answer the charges and since he has decided not be appear because his terms were not met, he could be summarily suspended or sacked.

If he is suspended even for a short period, Muthupalaniappan cannot contest as chairman of his branch in Negri Sembilan when nationwide branch elections start from Feb 7.

"Consequently being not a branch chairman he is automatically disqualified from contest for the president's post in the MIC election," party insiders said.

"This is an indirect way to knock him off even before the election for president starts," they said. "This is a clear abuse of powers to stop a legitimate challenge."

"Samy Vellu should not do this. He should fight fair and defeat any challenger. This shows he is afraid he could be defeated," they said.

Despite the massive polls losses Samy Vellu, who has been president since 1979, is seeking re-election for a 10th term and hopes to win and continue as president for another three-year term.

However the mood among the party rank and file is hostile and party insiders said Muthupalaniappan would have easily qualified to challenge if he was not charged.

"Charging Muthupalaniappan sends the wrong signals to the party grassroots that Samy Vellu is still in control and critics who side with him would be severely punished," the insiders said.

Although it was earlier announced the presidential election would be held in March this year and a presidential election committee chaired by Penang MIC leader Datuk K. Vijayanathan was formed but up to now no date has been fixed for the election of a new president.

No other challenger besides Muthupalaniappan is likely as the two potential contestants - deputy-president Datuk G. Palanivel and former deputy president Datuk S.Subramaniam - don't want to upset the apple cart but want to wait for Samy Vellu to hand over to either one of them when the "time comes."

Samy Vellu is also cleverly playing them against each other dangling the big prize before them and ensuring that they don't, together with others, gang up against him.

With Muthupalaniappan out of the way the path is wide open for Samy Vellu to retain his post without any problem but that victory could be rejected by party members and the community as a "sham."

It would alienate MIC members and worsen the contempt for the party in the Indian community and any chance of a successful re-branding and return to respectability remains futile.

Authorities tighten screws on ISA vigil participants

Fr Paulino Miranda, the parish priest of the Catholic Church of the Divine Mercy in Shah Alam, is among those who have been asked to appear in court on Thursday to be charged in connection with their participation in an Abolish ISA vigil/Bersih anniversary commemoration.

Paulino was among 23 arrested during the vigil on 9 November 2008 and later released on police bail the same night. Their bail was not extended when they reported at the police station on 24 November. But since last Friday, several of them including Miranda have received phone calls from the police informing them that they will be charged at the PJ Magistrates Court at 2.00pm on 22 January. Among those who received phone calls were a few vigil participants who were campaigning in the Kuala Terengganu by-election.

The authorities appear to be tightening the screws on those participating in the Abolish ISA vigils.

In Kuala Terengganu, I ran into Bukit Mertajam MP Chong Eng, who told me she had received a phone call from the police informing her that they want to record her statement in connection with her participation at one of the Penang Abolish ISA vigils.

The emcee for one of the Penang Abolish ISA vigils, Paula Khoo, is due to report to the police on the third day of Chinese New Year to find out what action, if any, police want to take. When she last reported to the police, they extended her police bail.

The weekly Abolish ISA Masses have resumed at the Church of the Immaculate Conception in Penang. The first Mass of 2009 was held last Wednesday. Another Mass is expected to be held this Wednesday.

Nasib baik orang Melayu masih ada Raja…

(Agenda Daily)


Pada minggu lalu Raja Muda Perak, Raja Datuk Dr. Nazrin Shah menyatakan bahawa Raja-raja Melayu telah menzahirkan teguran terhadap rancangan penempatan semula kampung baru pada tahun 1950 yang dianggap telah mencuri hak tanah kepunyaan Melayu.Titah Raja Narin, penempatan semula di bawah Rancangan Briggs itu yang memberi nikmat kepada 400,000 penduduk setinggan Cina telah menimbulkan rasa kurang senang di kalangan Raja-raja Melayu kerana orang Melayu sendiri masih banyak yang tidak bertanah.Pendedahan Raja Nazrin itu telah mengundang pelbagai rasa kurang senang di kalangan pelbagai pihak organisasi dan individu Melayu masa kini kerana sejarah yang lebih hitam kini kembali berlaku gara-gara kerajaan negeri Perak di bawah 'pimpinan' Datuk Seri Ir. Mohamad Nizar Jamaluddin memberikan hak milik pajakan 999 tahun kepada masyarakat Cina di negeri itu.Para pemimpin organisasi bukan kerajaan untuk membela nasib dan masa depan orang Melayu mahukan Mohamad Nizar bewrtanggungjawab terhadap pendedahan dan teguran Raja Nazrin itu.

Malah ada juga suara yang mahukan Nizar segera meletakkan jawatan dan insaf akan tindakannya yang amat menyayat perasaan orang Melayu Perak khususnya dan Melayu lain amnya.

Walaupun sering dikatakan bahawa sejarah ibarat pusingan roda yang membawa maksud sesuatu peristiwa itu akan berulang, para pemimpin Cina negara kita nampaknya mahu menidakkan perkara itu. Lantaran itulah, MCA dan Gerakan meminta semua pihak berhenti mengungkit soal sejarah kerana ia boleh mengakibatkan ketegangan kaum.

Apabila Raja Muda Perak menyebut kembali pendirian Raja-raja Melayu menzahirkan teguran berkenaan dalam Mesyuarat Raja-raja Melayu pada 24 Mei 1950, tentulah Baginda tidak bermaksud untuk mencetuskan ketegangan kaum di negara ini.

Persoalannya, jika mengungkit-ungkit sejarah boleh menjadi punca ketegangan kaum, tidakkah pula mengambil tanah Melayu lebih awal mengundang ketegangan?

Apabila mereka mengingatkan semua pihak agar tidak mengungkit kembali fakta sejarah, adakah mereka juga bermaksud untuk meminta Raja Nazrin atau mana-mana Raja Melayu agar 'tutup mulut'?

Timbalan Ketua Wanita Gerakan, Ng Siew Lai yang meminta tindakan mengungkit itu amat penting dihentikan pada saat-saat negara menghadapi krisis ekonomi dan semua pihak hendaklah berfikiran terbuka serta berganding bahu mengukuhkan hubungfan muhibah.

Setiausaha Agung MCA, Senator Wong Foon Meng pula memberitahu setiap anggota masyarakat di negara ini telah memainkan peranan masing=masing membangun dan memajukan negara.

Oleh itu, katanya, sumbangan mereka tidak harus dipertikaikan, sebaliknya harus diiktiraf.

Benar sangatlah kata kedua-dua tokoh politik berkenaan. Cuma, kita tertanya-tanya adakah mereka benar-benar mmemahmi erti pengiktirafan yang diperkatakan itu.

Jika usaha mereka membangun dan memajukan tanah Melayu harus diberi iktiraf, pernahkah pula agaknya mereka memikirkan apakah iktiraf yang harus diberikan kepada orang Melayu yang bukan sahaja menjadi penduduk asal negara ini yang dipanggil sebagai Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, juga mempertahan dan memertabatkan negara ini.

Dengan usaha dan titik peluh dan adakalanya titisan air mata serta darah inilah menjadikan Malaya dan kemudiannya Malaysia sebqgqi tarikan untuk orang asing khususnya dari China dan India mencari rezeki di sini.

Sudahlah rezeki iaitu bidang ekonomi mereka 'pulun', tanah orang Melayu juga hendak disapu bersih.

Secara pentadbirannya, mereka tidak kelihatan menyapu bersih tanah milik Melayu kerana kelulusan pajakan dari 99 tahun yang menjadi tradisi di seluruh negara dipanjangkan kepada kira-kira 12 generasi iaitu 999 tahun diputuskan oleh Ahli-ahli Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri.

Benarlah seperti yang ditegaskan oleh Pemuda Pas negeri Perak bahawa keputusan itu bukan dibuat oleh Ir. Mohamad Nizar, tetapi oleh EXCO, jadi Menteri Besar harus dipertahankan dan tidak perlu meletak jawatan walaupun desakan datang secara bertalu-talu kerana gagal memertahankan hak orang Melayu, sebaliknya memberi keistimewaan kepada pemastautin di kampung-kampung baru.

Barangkali, Pemuda Pas Perak serta sesiapa sahaja yang mempertahankan Nizar Jamaluddin tidak faham apa yang didesak. Nizar selaku ketua kepada kerajaann negeri Perak didesak kerana harus bertanggungjawab terhadap keputusan Exco itu,

Orang ramai juga setuju bahawa langkah memberi pajakan 999 tahun itu bukanlah keputusan Nizar, tetapi apa yang amat mendukacitakan ialah kegagalan beliau 'mengawal' atau memimpin para ahli EXCOnya hingga mengakibatkan ada orang yang berputih mata sedang yang lain pula bertepuk tangan.

Gejala yang berlaku di negeri pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat ini bukanlah sesuatu yang asing. Walaupun Menteri Besarnya orang Melayu (kerana perlembagaan negeri menyatakan sedemikian), EXCOnya bercampur-campur dan mempunyai 'kuasa untuk tawar-menawar'. Jika tawar-menawar tidak menjadi kenyataan, kaedah lain boleh digunakan.

Salah satu daripadanya untuk menarik diri dan keluar dari pakatan berkenaan. Taktik inilah yang agak digeruni dan mereka, iaitu para Menteri besar tiada mempunyai pilihan kecuali akur kepada desakan atau kata dua.

Nampaknya, kini orang bukan Melayu bukan sahaja telah 'menguasai; orang Melayu, tetapi mereka sudah semakin berani dengan mengeluarkan kenyataan yang turut melibatkan raja-raja Melayu dengan memberi ingatan jangan mengungkit sejarah lama .-


Siakap Senohong Gelama Ikan Duri. Bercakap Bohong Lama-lama Mencuri

Saya sehari di Permatang Pauh; memenuhi jemputan kenduri di Permatang Rawa, mengacau bubur di Sungai Semambu dan singgah di mesjid Kubang Semang. Mesjid tersebut tersohor kerana giat dalam program penghayatan.

Tetapi kini kian terkenal manakala terpapar dimuka depan Suara Keadilan kisah janji kosong Dato’ Najib menjelang pilihanraya Permatang Pauh Ogos lalu. Kata penduduk, “100 ribu? Habuk pun tak dak!”
Jawab Najib sehari sebelum pilihanraya Kuala Terengganu “minggu depan”. Saya menambah:”inshaallah”.

Sumbangan Para Bloggers Amat Dihargai

Ketambatu menulis:

Tahniah kepada Calun Parlimen K. Terengganu, Mohd Abdul Wahid Endut, yang menang bergaya mengalahkan Calun UMNO, Wan Farid yang juga merupakan calun favourite Pak Lah di Terengganu.

Memang dari awal, sudah di jangka bahawa PAS akan memenangi pilihanraya ini. Namun sesungguhnya yang membimbangkan adalah penyelewengan yang mampu di buat oleh agen agen UMNO, polis dan SPR.

Saya percaya bahawa memang terdapat penipuan, cuma biar lah mereka pendam. Yang penting, kita dah menang dan pemantauan akan terus di buat untuk masa masa yang akan datang.

Apa yang saya tekankan disini adalah, betapa parti PAS sesungguhnya pandai mengambil hati para pengundi, rakyat dan blogger.

Terdahulu, TG Haji Hadi membuat kenyataan bahawa beliau akan merujuk kepada bloggers sebelum membuat keputusan siapa yang akan menjadi calun. Dan selepas menang, Husam Musa mengucapkan terima kaseh kepada blogger menerusi Sya Reformis, ahli Bloggernetwork.

Jika di imbau kembali rentetan kemenangan yang berlaku sejak pilihanraya umum ke 12 tahun lepas, saya masih tidak mendengar sebarang ucapan terima kasih dari Pemimpin PKR. Dari Syed Ali, YB YB mahupun Anwar dan juga Wan Azizah sendiri.

Selepas kemenangan PAS pada PRU12 lepas, ramai blogger yang datang ke KL untuk hadiri majlis makan malam dan kesyukuran. Ketika itu Menteri Besar Perak, DS Ir Nizar pun hadir.

Mungkin aku terlepas pandang, tapi rasanya tidak silap.

Adakah PKR rasa mereka menang kerana mereka itu hebat, atau mereka menang kerana faktor Anwar?

Saya rasa kemenangan yang tercapai adalah kerana orang terlalu benci pada UMNO. Dan kerana itu lah maka ramai YB YB di kalangan PKR yang kita tidak kenal tapi masih mampu menang. Akhirnya bila menjalankan tugas, sesungguhnya mereka tidak berkalibar. Lebih cakap dari buat dan ada yang sedang mengumpul projek untuk kaya dalam semusim pemerintahan.

Kerana itu, saya berharap agar, pemimpin PKR kena nilaikan diri anda, cermin dulu wajah dan berterima kaseh lah pada pengundi dan para blogger yang terus berusaha tanpa di bayar gaji.

Saya mungkin terkebelakang di dalam hal ini, tapi blogger yang senior nampaknya, ada yang hidup ala kadar dan kekadang miss soru. Siapa yang membela mereka? Tambah tambah lagi di dalam negeri yang bermenteri Besarkan pemimpin dari PKR.

Kalau lupa, ucap sekarang. Kalau tidak, tak mustahil diorang akan belasah mereka mereka ini di masa akan datang. Pesan saya, biar sombong tapi jangan bodoh. Biar bodoh tapi jangan sombong.

——

Arakian, sekonyong-konyong ada yang kononnya menulis mewakili bloggers mengemis perhatian malah mengugut! Malangnya fakta meleset sekali.

Biasa saja kita dengan leteran, atau membebel. Tetapi sekadar maklumat agar tidak ada yang turut tersasul nanti. Dalam ucapan dan kenyataan saya salepas pilihanraya, ucapan Azizah selaku Presiden di Kongres yang lalu, kenyataan berkait penahanan Raja Petra dan sebagainya, dinyatakan sumbangan positif para blogger.

Alahai…

ANWAR IBRAHIM

Monday, 19 January 2009

Pakatan forms council to counter federal discrimination

UPDATED

By Neville Spykerman(Themalaysianinsider)

ALOR SETAR, Jan 18- A formal Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Chief Ministers Council and Secretariat was established today to counter what they claimed is discrimination by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Speaking to the press this evening after meeting his fellow PR mentris besar, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said they were fed up of being left out by Abdullah, who only met with Barisan Nasional menteris besar.

“When MBs of all states meets during the Council of Rulers, we are excluded by the Prime Minister, who meets only BN MBs separately at the end.”

Lim said they were left with two options, to either go back to their states or wander the streets of the city they were in.

“We have been patient for nearly a year and as leaders who are democratically elected by the people we felt we had no choice but to form the council.”

The establishment of the new council was formally called the Mentaloon Declaration by Kedah MB Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak who hosted the meeting in Dewan Sri Mentaloon, which is at his official residence, here.

He said the council will be used to co-ordinate the activities of the five states and was necessary to reduce miscommunication between leaders.

“Many feel that we (PR Chief Ministers) are contradicting each other and through the council we hope to sit together and iron out our differences.”

Perak MB Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin said the council will meet at least twice a year and will be chaired by the menteri besar hosting the event.

Selangor MB Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim said the Council was an opportunity for them to exchange ideas and learn from each other.

“It will also enable us to manage our states more effectively.”

Kelantan MB Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat was at the meeting earlier but did not attend the press conference.

DATUK SERI ABDULLAH AHMAD BADAWI SHOULD CALL FOR A SNAP GENERAL ELECTIONS BEFORE RESIGNING

With various accusation and criticism raised against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his administration, it would be most appropriate for him (Datuk Seri Abdullah) to call for a SNAP GENERAL ELECTIONS to gauge who will administer the country after his intended departure in March 2009.

The recent by-elections in Permatang Pauh and Kuala Terengganu have indicated that the rakyat is really unhappy with the Barisan Nasional administration, although various 'goodies' and smear campaign employed had backfired.

Just try to hand over the premiership to his deputy would be most inappropriate since he had failed to convince the voters that the BN administration is what Malaysians need and look forward to.

The position of Prime Minister is given to the member of parliament who has the confidence of the Dewan Rakyat and just trying to hand over the baton is now considered outdated since these leaders have created a scenario that the failure were attributed to the weakness of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah.

In actual fact, the whole Barisan Nasional leadership need to be overhauled, with new and younger faces to restore the confidence the rakyat will have towards the Barisan Nasional.

In order for such a CHANGE a snap general elections would be the answer and since it is the absolute prerogative to dissolve and call for the fresh general elections, it would be best of him to use this to rebuild his integrity and reputation with the rakyat.

Then, the issue of incompetency and so forth would never arise again and parties who have been calling for his (PM Datuk Seri Abdullah) immediate exit would stop making these calls in fear of their own misdeeds and abuse of position.

Let the rakyat elect the suitable candidates who will administer the country, Pah Lah.

DR M CLAIMS BN ESPECIALLY UMNO IS INFECTED WITH CORRUPTION AND GREED FOR POWER

At last, the Barisan Nasional leaders especially from UMNO who dominate the ruling coalition have come to their senses that the rakyat do not want them anymore since they are uncaring, ineffective, inefficient, arrogant and corrupted and their 50 odd years was a greatest disaster for Malaysians on the whole.

The mentor of this creation, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has finally spill the beans -''Barisan Nasional which has ruled for half a century will be dumped at the next elections if it continues to embrace corrupt leaders''.

It seems the time has come for Malaysians to evaluate all projects and decisions made for the rakyat by the Barisan Nasional government and punish everyone involved in this menace, misuse of power and waste of public funds.

What that surprise sensible Malaysians is the continued attack on Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. It seems that there is something that is still untold and his continued claim that Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak should not be blamed for the surprising defeat in Kuala Terengganu is absolutely unacceptable. Datuk Seri Najib was totally responsible for the BN machinery and looking at the amount of public funds wasted at Kuala Terengganu, it would be sensible that Datuk Seri Najib should resign and take complete responsibility. But as usual, its not UMNO or BN style and now they have found a scapegoat to blame for their disastrous defeat. Datuk Seri Najib should realise that every action of his has been doubted, land title issue, unfair treatment of UMNOputras and other Malaysians, mystery involving the murder trial of Altantuya Shariibuu, royalty issue, Monsoon Cup and many more.

It would be wiseful for Tun Dr Mahathir to stop commenting on Malaysian politics since he was the one who had corrupted the system while Datuk Seri Najib should resign immediately and take full responsibility of his failure.

KT by-election – “308” political tsunami on course and a dire warning to UMNO and in particular Najib

The Kuala Terengganu by-election has lived up to its historic significance.

It has delivered two important messages.

Firstly, that the “308” political tsunami of the March general election last year is very much on course, confirming that the paradigm shift in Malaysian politics some ten months ago was no fluke shot but represented deep-seated and wide-ranging political aspirations of Malaysians.

Secondly, a dire warning to Umno and in particular Datuk Seri Najib Razak who is to be Prime Minister in ten weeks’ time of the far-reaching consequences if they refuse to heed the people’s call for change.

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah in his comment on the Kuala Terenggany by-election result has likened UMNO and BN to “a sinking ship” if their leaders remain in denial.

How many UMNO and BN leaders would dare to agree with Razaleigh when he warned:

“Money, machinery and incumbency could not trump the call for change. BN will lose, and will in the end lose everything, until we respond fully and sincerely…

“Actually this was more than a referendum on the leadership. It was a test of the relevance of UMNO in its present form. If UMNO is no longer relevant to the Malays, the BN formula is dead.”

The results of the Kuala Terengganu by-election will have to be studied in detail, in particular the impact of the hudud issue in the by-election.

Public forum: "Persons with Disabilities Act 2008 - What next?"

ImageOPENING SPEECH BY DATO’ AMBIGA SREENEVASAN

PRESIDENT OF THE MALAYSIAN BAR

Yang Berbahagia Dato' Meme Zainal Rashid, Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat, distinguished guests, speakers and moderators of today’s Forum, representatives of civil society, members of the Malaysian Bar, ladies and gentlemen.

It gives me great pleasure on behalf of the Malaysian Bar to bid you a good morning and to warmly welcome you to our Auditorium for this Forum. I am sure we are all looking forward to it, and to hearing and learning from the speakers and participants.
The disability rights movement began in the U.S. in the 1970s following on from the civil rights and women’s rights movements in the 1960s. We have come a long way from when John Tyler, himself disabled with severe polio, parked his wheelchair in front of Metro buses in Seattle in the late 1970s as he campaigned for better wheelchair lifts on buses. The aim of such movements was to improve the quality of life of people with disabilities. Simple everyday routines for others proved difficult for disabled persons because of the lack of accessibility and safety in public areas like streets, buildings and transportation. It was more than 30 years later that we were to see the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities come to light.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability (“Convention”) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 13 December 2006, and became opened for signature on 30 March 2007.

The Convention aims to change the perception of disability from one that looks upon it with sympathy to one that deals with it with respect, i.e. it moves from a charity-based model to a rights-based one.

The Convention provided that it would come into force 30 days after the 20th ratification, and 30 days after the 10th ratification in respect of the Optional Protocol. The Convention came into force on 3 May 2008. To-date, 138 countries around the world have signed the Convention.

The Convention itself was negotiated over more than 5 years with a large representation of non-governmental organizations involved.

The Convention underlines eight general principles, namely:-

1. respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one’s own choices, and independence of persons;
2. non-discrimination;
3. full and effective participation and inclusion in society;
4. respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part of human diversity and humanity;
5. equality of opportunity;
6. accessibility;
7. equality between men and women; and
8. respect for the evolving capacities of children with disabilities and respect for the right of children with disabilities to preserve their identities.

Malaysia signed the Convention on 8 April 2008. However Malaysia has yet to ratify the Convention. Out of the 138 countries that have signed the Convention, only 46 have so far gone on to ratify or accede to the Convention.

All of the rights under the Convention are actually contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Nevertheless a specific convention for those with disabilities allows for their issues to be brought into sharp focus for resolution.

There is no doubt a cost element is involved in redesigning public areas and buildings and undertaking obligations. The Convention therefore calls for “progressive realisation” of most of its provisions. That cost, however, will be offset by the greater contributions that can be made by persons with disabilities to society.

The Convention therefore allows countries to set goals towards the full inclusion and equality of opportunity for people with disabilities.

There is also an Optional Protocol to the Convention. This also came into force on 3 May 2008. The Optional Protocol creates additional functions for the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities which is to be established as part of the Convention. This Committee would be empowered to consider what are known as “individual communications” and “inquiries”. The Committee would then be able to consider communications from individuals or group of individuals claiming to be victims of a violation of the provisions of the Convention by a State Party to the Optional Protocol. The Committee would then also be able to conduct an inquiry on a State Party, following information received indicating grave or systemic violations of the Convention by the State Party. To-date 81 countries have signed the Optional Protocol, and 27 have gone on to ratify or accede to the Optional Protocol. Malaysia has not signed or acceded to the Optional Protocol.

The Malaysian Bar strongly urges the Government to ratify the Convention as quickly as possible, and to also accede to the Optional Protocol.

Pursuant to signing the Convention, the Government has introduced new legislation by way of the Persons With Disabilities Act 2008 (“Act”). This came into force on 7 July 2008. Although not expressly stated, the intention of the Act appears to be to bring into domestic law the principles of the Convention. This can be seen in the fact that the Act borrows heavily from the Convention.

From a human rights perspective, the Act may be seen as a small but significant step forward. However it is my opinion that we need to have much more courage in our beliefs and convictions and adopt the full spirit and intent of the Convention in a more all-embracing and comprehensive manner.

Let me give you an extended example of what I mean. One of the paragraphs (paragraph 3) of the preamble to the Act reads as follows:-


“RECOGNIZING the importance of accessibility to the physical, social, economic and cultural environment, to health and education and to information and communication, in enabling persons with disabilities to fully and effectively participate in society.”

This is taken directly from paragraph (v) of the preamble to the Convention which reads as follows:-


Recognizing the importance of accessibility to the physical, social, economic and cultural environment, to health and education and to information and communication, in enabling persons with disabilities to fully enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms.“

The two paragraphs are identical word for word except at the end, when the much stronger and more noble “enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms” is removed and replaced with the words “and effectively participate in society”.

Let me quote you the definition of the term "reasonable accommodation", which is a concept introduced in the Convention and adopted in the Act, to cater to the needs of persons with disabilities. In the Convention, this term “reasonable accommodation” means:-


“necessary and appropriate modification and adjustments not imposing a disproportionate or undue burden, where needed in a particular case, to ensure to persons with disabilities the enjoyment or exercise on an equal basis with others of all human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

In the Act, this term “reasonable accommodation” is defined as:-


“necessary and appropriate modifications and adjustments not imposing a disproportionate or undue burden, where needed in a particular case, to ensure to persons with disabilities the enjoyment or exercise of the quality of life and wellbeing on an equal basis with persons without disabilities;

Again, the drafters of the Act have shied away from the fuller language of the Convention, in affirming equality for persons with disabilities with others “of all human rights and fundamental freedoms” and instead only promising “quality of life and wellbeing on an equal basis with persons without disabilities”.

We have to ask why the drafters of the Act changed the last few words of the paragraph in the preamble and in the definition of “reasonable accommodation” to remove the reference to persons with disabilities being able to “enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms”?

Perhaps it is an indication that our ambitions with respect to persons with disabilities is still very small, which is such a pity. In terms of this concept of “reasonable accommodation”, the Act provides that this should be implemented only in the area of education. Whereas in the Convention, this concept of “reasonable accommodation” covers not just education but all aspects of life, from access to justice, liberty and security of the person, and employment. The provisions of the Convention are far more comprehensive and inclusive.

As I indicated earlier, it is only in the Optional Protocol that there are measures to challenge one’s own Government as to whether it has lived up to its obligations under the Convention. In the Act, there is no provision for any penalty for any party who does not live up to the obligations under the Act. In fact, the Federal Government is expressly excluded from any wrong-doing for any failure to address the needs of persons with disabilities under the Act.

The Act instead takes on a more advisory and enabling environment. The Act provides for the formation of the National Council for Persons with Disabilities where Government representatives and representatives of persons with disabilities will work to restore and uphold the rights of disabled people in Malaysia.

The Act is far-reaching in that it accepts that persons with disabilities have a right to enjoy the benefits of amongst others public transport, housing, education, employment, health-care, etc. but provides little or no remedies if they face discrimination in this regard.

As a contribution to society and the community of the disabled in Malaysia, the Bar Council’s Law Reform and Special Areas Committee has organised this forum to educate the disabled, their families, caregivers and interested members of the public on the legal rights of the disabled as enshrined in the Act and to promote better understanding and effective implementation of the provisions in the Act.

Ladies and gentlemen, in the area of persons with disabilities we are only limited in what can be achieved by our vision. I am reminded of the words of the writer Hellen Keller, who was blind. She was once asked whether it was a tragedy that she had been born blind. Hellen Keller replied that the greater tragedy was to be born with sight but be unable to see.

I wish to take this opportunity to thank the Organising Committee for its efforts. I wish everyone a fruitful discussion.

Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan
President, Malaysian Bar
17th January 2009

Hadi to Abdullah: Stay on as PM

(Rocky´s bru)



"Saya meminta Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi terus kekal sebagai Perdana
Menteri dan meneruskan reformasi yang diperlukan seperti dalam bidang pilihan raya dan beberapa bidang lain." - Abdul Hadi Awang, PAS president



Is it a joke? Some people would think so. I believe that while he is not really sincere in wanting Abdullah to stay on as PM, Abdul Hadi is dead serious!

It's politically expedient. The weak leadership of Abdullah has strengthened Pakatan Rakyat. PAS, DAP and PKR never had it so good. When Abdul Hadi said that "the Pakatan Rakyat will give Abdullah the necessary support to stay on as PM and carry out his reforms", he clearly spoke on behalf of the other Pakatan leaders, including Anwar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang, Tok Guru, and Karpal Singh.

How far is Pakatan Rakyat willing to go to ensure that Abdullah remains as Prime Minister after March this year?

Read the m-Star article here.

Dr Mahathir, meanwhile, says the BN's defeat is a vote of no-confidence against Abdullah. And a warning for Najib Razak. Read here.

Selected commentaries on BN's fall in KT:
The Scribe's Pengundi Masih Marah Kepada BN
Pasquale's BN would have had better chances if the candidate was not Wan Farid
Aziz Hassan's Worse in Every Sense
Nobisha's Rakyat nak Monsoon drain, BN beri Monsoon Cup!
Nuraina's One more vote for Hudud!

Pentarama!? Jailani Harun is pissed off. He thinks a Pentarama (a night fiesta of songs and dance) held on the eve of the election, attended by the BN leaders and 3000 guests, contributed to the BN's defeat. Read They wanted you to lose, Farid!

Don't Blame Najib For BN Defeat, Says Mahathir

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 18 (Bernama) -- Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak should not be blamed for the Barisan Nasional (BN) defeat in the Kuala Terengganu by-election.

"Some voters did not support BN because they do not like the candidate," he said when asked to comment on polls where Mohd Abdul Wahid Endut from Pas beat BN's Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh by 2,631 votes yesterday.

Speaking to reporters after launching the Save Palestinians Campaign organised by the Coalition of Malaysian NGOs at the Bangsar Sports Complex here today, Dr Mahathir said the voters had to choose between the BN candidate and Pas' and they finally picked the Pas candidate.

"They also do not like Pas but they were forced to choose," he said.

Najib who is BN deputy chairman led the coalition's election machinery.

-- BERNAMA

KT By-Election Reflects Need For Reforms - Gerakan

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 18 (Bernama) -- The result of the Kuala Terengganu by-election reflects the urgency for Barisan Nasional (BN) to carry out further reforms.

Gerakan president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon said the result amplified the need for BN to become a more cohesive and effective multiracial coalition to continue representing, serving and uniting the people.

He said that despite the disappointment, BN leaders should remain positive and move forward by re-doubling their efforts to realise the various reforms as promised.

"We must focus on re-building unity among the races, reducing the people's economic burden and re-assuring them of our deep commitment to ensuring fairness and justice for all," he said in a statement today.

-- BERNAMA

Sunday, 18 January 2009

PAS wins KT by 2,631 votes

PAS WINS KUALA TERENGGANU BY 2,769 VOTES

Unofficial sources have revealed that PAS has won the Kuala Terengganu Parliamentary by-election with a majority of 2,769 votes.

The time has come for Barisan Nasional component parties to evaluate their position before another March 8 tsunami hits them totally due to the uncaring, selfish, arrogant and corrupted UMNO.

Syabas to Kuala Terengganu voters for their VOTE FOR CHANGE.

news courtesy of anilnetto.com & Malaysiakini, while picture courtesy of Malaysiakini

A father, his son and the actress who swallowed weed killer

By Baradan Kuppusamy, themalaysianinsider.com, Jan 16 2009
sujatha

The upcoming inquest into the death of K. Sujatha, actress and former personal secretary to Vel Paari, the son of embattled MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu, will be explosive and is likely to be politically damaging to both father and son.

The son is just emerging, politically, out of his father's shadow and is ambitious to carve out a political career for himself as his father departs from the political stage is imminent.

But the inquest, in which Vel Paari is expected to be a star witness, could possibly damage his political career.

A key question the Feb 13 inquest will determine is whether Sujatha was murdered, as alleged by some opposition politicians, or had committed suicide by consuming weed killer.

Either way questions would be raised during the inquest over how and why she died, why she was rushed from her apartment in Kuala Lumpur to the Klang hospital some 30km away and why her body was hurriedly cremated.

"This inquest is long overdue and I hope all these questions are answered," said Kapar MP S. Manikavasagam, the PKR leader who put the issue in the public arena and made a name for himself as a opposition firebrand and is a fierce critic of Samy Vellu, Vel Paari and former Sentul OCP ACP K.Kumaran over the handling of Sujatha's death.

Kumaran has since filed a multi- million dollar defamation suit against Manivasagam for alleging he covered up the case. Vel Paari has repeatedly denied any improper involvement in her death.

It has been widely speculated that Val Paari had a relationship with the actress when Sujatha worked as his private secretary at Maika Holdings where Paari, Samy Vellu's only son, is CEO.

The inquest at the Magistrates Court 2 in Jalan Duta will be before Coroner Mohd Faizi bin Abu.

Police extensively probed the case and questioned Paari at length but never made public their findings, which are likely to be revealed at the inquest.

The unresolved controversy surrounding her death was a key issue exploited by the opposition to discredit Samy Vellu, the MIC and consequently caused the BN the Indian votes in the general election.

Political analysts say it is significant that the inquest is being held now, nearly two years after her death, and at a time when Samy Vellu is mired in numerous controversies including his still unknown plans to hand over power of the party to a yet unnamed successor.

The inquest, MIC insiders said, will pile the pressure on Samy to hand over power sooner rather than later.

Sujatha, 29, died on June 25, 2007 at the Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital in Klang after she swallowed weed killer.

She is said to have confessed on her death bed to what had actually taken place at her apartment but that confession has also never been revealed.

Manikavasagam, who accused Kumaran of covering up the case, had claimed that he had proof of foul play linking Vel Paari to the case and lodged several police reports alleging the same.

But Paari denied any involvement. He was questioned at length by a special Bukit Aman team that took over the investigation from the Sentul police.

Manikavasagam has also asked the Bar Council to hold a watching brief at the inquest.

Kemenangan Rakyat Bergema Di Kuala Terengganu

Alhamdulillah syukur ke hadrat Ilahi, Pakatan Rakyat berjaya menambah satu lagi kerusi di Dewan Rakyat, menjadikan jumlah keseluruhan sebanyak 83 kerusi.

Saya mengambil kesempatan ini untuk merakamkan setingi-tinggi penghargaan kepada para pengundi Kuala Terengganu kerana memilih calon PAS, YB Mohd Abdul Wahid Endut sebagai Ahli Parlimen Kuala Terengganu yang baru.

Tahniah dan syabas saya ucapkan buat Abdul Wahid serta seluruh jentera Pakatan Rakyat di Kuala Terengganu.

Saya percaya Abdul Wahid Endut akan melaksanakan tanggungjawabnya dengan sebaik mungkin, bukan sahaja kepada warga Kuala Terangganu, bahkan kepada rakyat Malaysia keseluruhannya.

Kemenangan beliau menjadi bukti bahawa rakyat sememangnya dahagakan perubahan.

Makanya hari ini kita menyaksikan di Kuala Terangganu, rakyat menuntut perubahan. Warga Kuala Terengganu melalui pilihanraya kecil ini telah memilih seorang calon yang mereka yakini akan dapat bersama rakan-rakan Pakatan Rakyat lainnya di Parlimen untuk merealisasikan agenda perubahan tersebut.

Kemenangan ini juga seharusnya menjadi pemangkin serta pencetus keazaman di kalangan pendokong Pakatan Rakyat untuk terus bekerja dengan lebih kuat, bukan untuk kita, akan tetapi untuk seluruh rakyat Malaysia. Moga Ketuanan Rakyat akhirnya menjadi kenyataan.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

Labu Airport


1. Air Asia has done well to explain the justification for the so-called KLIA-East in Labu.

2. Not having the facilities and personnel I can only give my very unprofessional view on the justification:

a) Passenger Capacity

I must congratulate Air Asia on its very remarkable success. By 2014 it will handle 26 million passengers. Present terminal at KLIA is handling about 25 million passengers.

KLIA is planned to handle 125 million passengers. It has 25,000 acres of land to build another terminal and four satellites. It can even duplicate these terminals and satellites. But Air Asia wants low-cost terminals with no aero-bridge, no luxury interiors. This is not a problem for KLIA.

There is enough space in the 25,000 acres of reserved land to build the low-cost terminal to accommodate the 60 million Air Asia passengers in the distant future. MAHB (Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad) can do this. (Incidentally Putrajaya has only 10,000 acres of land). However, by 2014 the total number of Air Asia passengers would only be 27 million. Accommodating this number should be no big deal for MAHB.

b) Runway capacity

By 2014 Air Asia will have 77 aircrafts. LCCT capacity will still be for 33 aircrafts. Does Air Asia expect all its aircrafts to be on the ground in LCCT all the time?

Usually some would be in the air and many would be at other airports. Expanding the parking area would not be too difficult. There would still be enough land at KLIA.

As for the runways Times Online reports that Heathrow will now build its third runway to be completed in 2020. Presently Heathrow has only two runways and it still handles almost 70 million passengers.

As stated above, KLIA can build another three runways to handle 125 million passengers. If passengers and aircrafts increase to more than presently handled by Heathrow, a third runway can quickly be built.

If KLIA LCCT is not connected by rail and bus, the thing to do is to provide all these. Extension to the Express Rail Link line can be built. Terrain is no problem. We have sliced through higher hills to build roads.

If the waiting time for taxis has increased due to the huge airport layout (I don't understand this), whatever solution for this problem is proposed for Labu, the same solution can also be applied to KLIA LCCT.

c) Number of Gates

Since Air Asia will not be using the main terminal why should the small number of gates there be of concern to Air Asia?

If Air Asia will be putting more than 55 Gates at Labu to cater for its large number of aircrafts and movements, why cannot LCCT at KLIA be expanded to have maybe 100 Gates to avoid any shortages? Will Labu be provided with 100 Gates? If so, when? Again, why be bothered about KLIA Terminal being equipped with aero-bridges etc when Air Asia does not want to use it?

3. The comparison with Dubai and Jackson Atlanta International Airport is misleading.

4. The picture shows four runways (no indication which airport). Multiple runways is common but they are operated by one airport with one control tower. The picture and the layout does not suggest separate towers for different runways. You cannot have multiple runways close to each other but controlled by different towers.

5. Perhaps Air Asia can show documents that separations between different airport runways of 2km are permissible. Is there any example of two major airports operating separately but located 2km from each other? I don't know. Please enlighten me.

6. The problem prompting the idea of a new airport is the allegedly high charges by MAHB for the use of LCCT by Air Asia. MAHB is owned by Khazanah and it is believed Khazanah has a stake in Air Asia. Both are therefore GLCs. The Government can tell them to negotiate fair charges. Or is it the Government that wants this airport at Labu for reasons other than need?

7. Or is it that Sime Darby now wants to go into airport business?

Saturday, 17 January 2009

Pas takes KT in convincing win

By Adib Zalkapli(themalaysianinsider)

KUALA TERENGGANU, Jan 17 — In a major boost for the Pakatan Rakyat, Pas won the Kuala Terengganu by-election tonight in convincing fashion, with its candidate Abdul Wahid Endut taking the parliamentary seat by a 2,631-vote majority over his closest rival, Barisan Nasional's Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Salleh.

With this win, the PR alliance increased its representation in Parliament to 82 seats, and while it does not significantly affect the balance of power, it provides the fledgling partnership of Pas, DAP and PKR a huge psychological advantage as it continues to try to destabilise and topple the BN government.

It is also the clearest sign yet that the PR alliance has not lost the support it obtained in the last general election, when it denied BN its traditional two-thirds majority in Parliament.

BN's defeat in Kuala Terengganu is also a significant setback for Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who led the ruling coalition's campaign and who is set to take power as prime minister in March when Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi retires.

With this defeat, BN still has 137 seats in Parliament, with one independent and two from SAPP. PR parties make up the remaining 82 lawmakers.

Wakaf Mempelam assemblyman Abdul Wahid defeated Wan Ahmad by 32,883 to 30,252 votes. Independent Azharudin Adam lost his deposit after obtaining only 193 votes. In last year's general election, BN won the seat by a wafer-thin 628 votes.

The turnaround for Pas shows the party not only managed to win over the crucial Chinese votes, which went BN's way last year, but also managed to claw back significant numbers of Malay votes which it had conceded to the ruling coalition previously.

The loss will cause BN to do some soul searching as it is the second by-election it has lost since March 8.

A victory in Kuala Terengganu would have represented a recovery from March 8, and provided a fillip for Najib as he prepares to take power.

But instead, Pas's win is likely to solidify PR's alliance and provide what Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim says will be renewed momentum to topple BN.

Thursday, 15 January 2009

HINDRAF- Media statement

Press Statement
HINDRAF – UMNO led cabinet and its bigotry.

In reference to the recent reporting in the mainstream media, criticism seems to mount against the report submitted by HINDRAF on the Malaysian Indian Minority Report and Human Rights Violations 2008 as the UMNO led cabinet seems more concerned in shutting out the truth.

HINDRAF stands by its report based on facts and figures reported in the said report and not the usual rhetoric by the popularized characters in the UMNO led mass media. The position taken by the cabinet and its coolies only begs a question on who does it really serves, themselves or the people.

There more than 30 violations and atrocities backed by researched news report and publication in this report which are purely factual but the cabinet is more concerned in its bigotry and self denial making rhetoric claims rather than addressing and tackling the issues put forward in the report.

Statement such as " we are deeply concerned with Waytha Moorthy's action as it would have harmful effects on what we have worked for and achieved during the past several months," by Dr Subra seems to be a veiled threat towards the Malaysian Indian community that they should keep quite and accept the lip service that had persevered for the last 52 years.

Rather than playing the mandore role in silence and submission, Samy & Subra should stand up for the Malaysian Indians and voice their concern for the systematic discrimination and marginalization of the Malaysian Indians and be a true representative of the society.

If UMNO disputes the report then I challenge them to have an open debate in these issues on a neutral ground ie in the UK or the USA.

The UMNO led government's relentless obstinate and zealous effort to shut out the grievances is nothing new but only to salvage its own dented ego although there are clear and present human right violations of the Malaysian Indian, yet salvaging one's own ego seems paramount against the cause of humanity.

The Malaysian Indians along with those who suffer in poverty and sidelined including the majority Muslims who had suffered enough under UMNO tyranny, definitely deserves a fairer government that listens to its society and tackle their issues without fear and favor.

HINDRAF calls for a United Malaysia that can rise and heed the voice for humanity irrespective of race, religion, color or creed to act upon those truth and reality that exist between us to forge us as a truly multicultural nation.


Waytha Moorthy

HINDRAF – Chairman
From Chennai