About 100 residents of Sg Ara staged a protest this morning
over an RM800m high-end hill-slope development project in their area.
They are peeved that the MPPP approved planning permission for a
hill-slope development project in their area on 2011. The planning
permission permission was given subject to technical conditions in a
geotech report and an EIA report.
Sunway City (Penang) Sdn Bhd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sunway
City Berhad (controlled by Jeffrey Cheah), acquired an 81 acres of
freehold land for RM39m in 2010. According to the residents, the
developer plans to build 600 homes (including 92 three-plus-one storey
bungalows and 14 condominium blocks ranging from nine to 18 storeys)
over the 81 acres, or 7.4 homes/acre.
The history of this area dates back to 1996, under the previous
administration, when the the area was categorised as low density perumahan am
in the MPPP’s Development Control and Planning Master Plan (Plan Dasar
Perancangan dan Kawalan Kemajuan). This plan, essentially a zoning plan,
was approved on 13 September 1996.
In 2007, the Penang Structure Plan was approved and gazetted. This
plan forbids development in areas exceeding 250 feet above sea level and
on hill-slopes with a gradient of more than 25 degrees. But according
to the state government, there is an exceptional projects (projek istimewa)
category for those projects classified as low density general housing
before the Structure Plan was tabled and these may be exempted from the
prohibitions subject to meeting technical conditions. Such projects are
also believed to require the approval of the State Planning Committee.
The land in question could be subject to the provisions of the Land
Conservation Act 1960, as according to the residents, much of the land
is zoned as forest land in the Penang Structure Plan.
Planning approval for the project was submitted on 21 December 2011
and approved on 26 March 2012, after the MPPP went through the motions
of seeking public objections last June. The approval was based on the
green light given to the geotech report by a committee on high-risk
development and the EIA by an environmental committee.
The neighbouring residents who had objected were told they could
appeal to the Appeals Board, and they have now since submitted their
appeals.
The question remains: why did the MPPP approve this project when
there are new guidelines on hill-slopes in place? Based on its old
zoning plan in 1996? Surely times have changed and that zoning plan
should be superseded in view of the state government’s policy of not
approving any more new hill-slope developments. After all, the present
state government claims that it has not approved a single hill-slope
project since taking over in 2008.
Who decided that this is a projek istimewa and on what legal grounds?
And doesn’t the MPPP now have a right to reject planning permission
for projects that are not in the public interest – e.g. congestion,
environmental destruction, and hill-slope risk? Does it really have no
choice but to approve?
A Penang state exco member has denied allegations that the state
government had tried to influence the MPPP to approve the hill-side
projects in Sungai Ara.
Sunway City has now submitted its building plan application for Phase 1 (on 30 April 2012).
A lot has changed in our awareness of hill-slope development since
1996. Why should we allow a 1996 MPPP zoning plan to trump the
over-riding restrictions on hill-slope development that should be
strictly enforced?
And what has happened to the Penang Island Local Plan?
These are all valid public interest questions.
Under subsection 25(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976, “If
it appears to the local planning authority to be in the public interest
that a planning permission granted under section 22 (3) or an approval
of a building plan given under any of the previous local government laws
should be revoked or modified, the local planning authority may order
the permission or approval to be revoked or modified to such extent as
appears to it to be necessary.”
The Penang public will watch closely the proceedings of the Appeals
Board, fixed for 18 July 2012. The residents are objecting based on,
among other considerations, the height of the project, the grounds for
approving it as projek istimewa and the density of the project.
Your CM said his administration did not approve the project, it was KTK wwho approved it in March 2012.
ReplyDelete