Kugan: conflicting testimonies suggests cover-up?

Just a quick note about the nonsense exposed at the Kugan trial. Can’t write long right now, but observe:

We have top cops saying the safety of detainees is not their responsibility, we have cops saying they witnessed beatings but did little to stop it & claiming Kugan had ‘no complaints’, and we have cops giving conflicting and confusing testimony.

All to find out whether just one cop was guilty or not.

I think these are all symptoms of a cover-up. If the case really was uncovering the truth, then I doubt we would see such confusion and inconsistencies.

If we do not get justice for Kugan in the courts, I hope we will at least transform the institutions that are empowered to reform those courts.